Serveur d'exploration sur le phanerochaete

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) bark composition and degradation by fungi: potential substrate for bioremediation.

Identifieur interne : 000587 ( Main/Curation ); précédent : 000586; suivant : 000588

Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) bark composition and degradation by fungi: potential substrate for bioremediation.

Auteurs : Lara Valentín [Finlande] ; Beata Kluczek-Turpeinen ; Stefan Willför ; Jarl Hemming ; Annele Hatakka ; Kari Steffen ; Marja Tuomela

Source :

RBID : pubmed:20005699

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

The composition of Scots pine bark, its degradation, and the production of hydrolytic and ligninolytic enzymes were evaluated during 90 days of incubation with Phanerochaete velutina and Stropharia rugosoannulata. The aim was to evaluate if pine bark can be a suitable fungal substrate for bioremediation applications. The original pine bark contained 45% lignin, 25% cellulose, and 15% hemicellulose. Resin acids were the most predominant lipophilic extractives, followed by sitosterol and unsaturated fatty acids, such as linoleic and oleic acids. Both fungi degraded all main components of bark, specially cellulose (79% loss by P. velutina). During cultivation on pine bark, fungi also degraded sitosterol, produced malic acid, and oxidated unsaturated fatty acids. The most predominant enzymes produced by both fungi were cellulase and manganese peroxidase. The results indicate that Scots pine bark supports enzyme production and provides nutrients to fungi, thus pine bark may be suitable fungal substrate for bioremediation.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.11.052
PubMed: 20005699

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Links to Exploration step

pubmed:20005699

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) bark composition and degradation by fungi: potential substrate for bioremediation.</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Valentin, Lara" sort="Valentin, Lara" uniqKey="Valentin L" first="Lara" last="Valentín">Lara Valentín</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>Department of Applied Chemistry and Microbiology, University of Helsinki, Finland. lara.valentincarrera@helsinki.fi</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Finlande</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Applied Chemistry and Microbiology, University of Helsinki</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Kluczek Turpeinen, Beata" sort="Kluczek Turpeinen, Beata" uniqKey="Kluczek Turpeinen B" first="Beata" last="Kluczek-Turpeinen">Beata Kluczek-Turpeinen</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Willfor, Stefan" sort="Willfor, Stefan" uniqKey="Willfor S" first="Stefan" last="Willför">Stefan Willför</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Hemming, Jarl" sort="Hemming, Jarl" uniqKey="Hemming J" first="Jarl" last="Hemming">Jarl Hemming</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Hatakka, Annele" sort="Hatakka, Annele" uniqKey="Hatakka A" first="Annele" last="Hatakka">Annele Hatakka</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Steffen, Kari" sort="Steffen, Kari" uniqKey="Steffen K" first="Kari" last="Steffen">Kari Steffen</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Tuomela, Marja" sort="Tuomela, Marja" uniqKey="Tuomela M" first="Marja" last="Tuomela">Marja Tuomela</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2010">2010</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:20005699</idno>
<idno type="pmid">20005699</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.1016/j.biortech.2009.11.052</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">000587</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000587</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000587</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Curation">000587</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en">Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) bark composition and degradation by fungi: potential substrate for bioremediation.</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Valentin, Lara" sort="Valentin, Lara" uniqKey="Valentin L" first="Lara" last="Valentín">Lara Valentín</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>Department of Applied Chemistry and Microbiology, University of Helsinki, Finland. lara.valentincarrera@helsinki.fi</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Finlande</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Applied Chemistry and Microbiology, University of Helsinki</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Kluczek Turpeinen, Beata" sort="Kluczek Turpeinen, Beata" uniqKey="Kluczek Turpeinen B" first="Beata" last="Kluczek-Turpeinen">Beata Kluczek-Turpeinen</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Willfor, Stefan" sort="Willfor, Stefan" uniqKey="Willfor S" first="Stefan" last="Willför">Stefan Willför</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Hemming, Jarl" sort="Hemming, Jarl" uniqKey="Hemming J" first="Jarl" last="Hemming">Jarl Hemming</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Hatakka, Annele" sort="Hatakka, Annele" uniqKey="Hatakka A" first="Annele" last="Hatakka">Annele Hatakka</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Steffen, Kari" sort="Steffen, Kari" uniqKey="Steffen K" first="Kari" last="Steffen">Kari Steffen</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Tuomela, Marja" sort="Tuomela, Marja" uniqKey="Tuomela M" first="Marja" last="Tuomela">Marja Tuomela</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j">Bioresource technology</title>
<idno type="eISSN">1873-2976</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2010" type="published">2010</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Biodegradation, Environmental (MeSH)</term>
<term>Cell Respiration (MeSH)</term>
<term>Fungi (metabolism)</term>
<term>Hydrolysis (MeSH)</term>
<term>Lignin (metabolism)</term>
<term>Molecular Weight (MeSH)</term>
<term>Pinus sylvestris (cytology)</term>
<term>Pinus sylvestris (enzymology)</term>
<term>Pinus sylvestris (metabolism)</term>
<term>Plant Bark (chemistry)</term>
<term>Plant Bark (cytology)</term>
<term>Plant Bark (enzymology)</term>
<term>Plant Bark (metabolism)</term>
<term>Plant Extracts (metabolism)</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Champignons (métabolisme)</term>
<term>Dépollution biologique de l'environnement (MeSH)</term>
<term>Extraits de plantes (métabolisme)</term>
<term>Hydrolyse (MeSH)</term>
<term>Lignine (métabolisme)</term>
<term>Masse moléculaire (MeSH)</term>
<term>Pinus sylvestris (cytologie)</term>
<term>Pinus sylvestris (enzymologie)</term>
<term>Pinus sylvestris (métabolisme)</term>
<term>Respiration cellulaire (MeSH)</term>
<term>Écorce (composition chimique)</term>
<term>Écorce (cytologie)</term>
<term>Écorce (enzymologie)</term>
<term>Écorce (métabolisme)</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="metabolism" xml:lang="en">
<term>Lignin</term>
<term>Plant Extracts</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="chemistry" xml:lang="en">
<term>Plant Bark</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="composition chimique" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Écorce</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="cytologie" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Pinus sylvestris</term>
<term>Écorce</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="cytology" xml:lang="en">
<term>Pinus sylvestris</term>
<term>Plant Bark</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="enzymologie" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Pinus sylvestris</term>
<term>Écorce</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="enzymology" xml:lang="en">
<term>Pinus sylvestris</term>
<term>Plant Bark</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="metabolism" xml:lang="en">
<term>Fungi</term>
<term>Pinus sylvestris</term>
<term>Plant Bark</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="métabolisme" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Champignons</term>
<term>Extraits de plantes</term>
<term>Lignine</term>
<term>Pinus sylvestris</term>
<term>Écorce</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en">
<term>Biodegradation, Environmental</term>
<term>Cell Respiration</term>
<term>Hydrolysis</term>
<term>Molecular Weight</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Dépollution biologique de l'environnement</term>
<term>Hydrolyse</term>
<term>Masse moléculaire</term>
<term>Respiration cellulaire</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The composition of Scots pine bark, its degradation, and the production of hydrolytic and ligninolytic enzymes were evaluated during 90 days of incubation with Phanerochaete velutina and Stropharia rugosoannulata. The aim was to evaluate if pine bark can be a suitable fungal substrate for bioremediation applications. The original pine bark contained 45% lignin, 25% cellulose, and 15% hemicellulose. Resin acids were the most predominant lipophilic extractives, followed by sitosterol and unsaturated fatty acids, such as linoleic and oleic acids. Both fungi degraded all main components of bark, specially cellulose (79% loss by P. velutina). During cultivation on pine bark, fungi also degraded sitosterol, produced malic acid, and oxidated unsaturated fatty acids. The most predominant enzymes produced by both fungi were cellulase and manganese peroxidase. The results indicate that Scots pine bark supports enzyme production and provides nutrients to fungi, thus pine bark may be suitable fungal substrate for bioremediation.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed>
<MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM">
<PMID Version="1">20005699</PMID>
<DateCompleted>
<Year>2010</Year>
<Month>04</Month>
<Day>23</Day>
</DateCompleted>
<DateRevised>
<Year>2010</Year>
<Month>02</Month>
<Day>03</Day>
</DateRevised>
<Article PubModel="Print-Electronic">
<Journal>
<ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1873-2976</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet">
<Volume>101</Volume>
<Issue>7</Issue>
<PubDate>
<Year>2010</Year>
<Month>Apr</Month>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>Bioresource technology</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>Bioresour Technol</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) bark composition and degradation by fungi: potential substrate for bioremediation.</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination>
<MedlinePgn>2203-9</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1016/j.biortech.2009.11.052</ELocationID>
<Abstract>
<AbstractText>The composition of Scots pine bark, its degradation, and the production of hydrolytic and ligninolytic enzymes were evaluated during 90 days of incubation with Phanerochaete velutina and Stropharia rugosoannulata. The aim was to evaluate if pine bark can be a suitable fungal substrate for bioremediation applications. The original pine bark contained 45% lignin, 25% cellulose, and 15% hemicellulose. Resin acids were the most predominant lipophilic extractives, followed by sitosterol and unsaturated fatty acids, such as linoleic and oleic acids. Both fungi degraded all main components of bark, specially cellulose (79% loss by P. velutina). During cultivation on pine bark, fungi also degraded sitosterol, produced malic acid, and oxidated unsaturated fatty acids. The most predominant enzymes produced by both fungi were cellulase and manganese peroxidase. The results indicate that Scots pine bark supports enzyme production and provides nutrients to fungi, thus pine bark may be suitable fungal substrate for bioremediation.</AbstractText>
<CopyrightInformation>Copyright 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</CopyrightInformation>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y">
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Valentín</LastName>
<ForeName>Lara</ForeName>
<Initials>L</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo>
<Affiliation>Department of Applied Chemistry and Microbiology, University of Helsinki, Finland. lara.valentincarrera@helsinki.fi</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Kluczek-Turpeinen</LastName>
<ForeName>Beata</ForeName>
<Initials>B</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Willför</LastName>
<ForeName>Stefan</ForeName>
<Initials>S</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Hemming</LastName>
<ForeName>Jarl</ForeName>
<Initials>J</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Hatakka</LastName>
<ForeName>Annele</ForeName>
<Initials>A</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Steffen</LastName>
<ForeName>Kari</ForeName>
<Initials>K</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Tuomela</LastName>
<ForeName>Marja</ForeName>
<Initials>M</Initials>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>eng</Language>
<PublicationTypeList>
<PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
<ArticleDate DateType="Electronic">
<Year>2009</Year>
<Month>12</Month>
<Day>14</Day>
</ArticleDate>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo>
<Country>England</Country>
<MedlineTA>Bioresour Technol</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>9889523</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>0960-8524</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
<ChemicalList>
<Chemical>
<RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber>
<NameOfSubstance UI="D010936">Plant Extracts</NameOfSubstance>
</Chemical>
<Chemical>
<RegistryNumber>9005-53-2</RegistryNumber>
<NameOfSubstance UI="D008031">Lignin</NameOfSubstance>
</Chemical>
</ChemicalList>
<CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset>
<MeshHeadingList>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D001673" MajorTopicYN="N">Biodegradation, Environmental</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D019069" MajorTopicYN="N">Cell Respiration</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D005658" MajorTopicYN="N">Fungi</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000378" MajorTopicYN="Y">metabolism</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D006868" MajorTopicYN="N">Hydrolysis</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D008031" MajorTopicYN="N">Lignin</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000378" MajorTopicYN="N">metabolism</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D008970" MajorTopicYN="N">Molecular Weight</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D041605" MajorTopicYN="N">Pinus sylvestris</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000166" MajorTopicYN="N">cytology</QualifierName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000201" MajorTopicYN="N">enzymology</QualifierName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000378" MajorTopicYN="Y">metabolism</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D024301" MajorTopicYN="N">Plant Bark</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000737" MajorTopicYN="N">chemistry</QualifierName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000166" MajorTopicYN="N">cytology</QualifierName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000201" MajorTopicYN="N">enzymology</QualifierName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000378" MajorTopicYN="Y">metabolism</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D010936" MajorTopicYN="N">Plant Extracts</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000378" MajorTopicYN="N">metabolism</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
</MeshHeadingList>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData>
<History>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received">
<Year>2009</Year>
<Month>09</Month>
<Day>09</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="revised">
<Year>2009</Year>
<Month>11</Month>
<Day>10</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted">
<Year>2009</Year>
<Month>11</Month>
<Day>11</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez">
<Year>2009</Year>
<Month>12</Month>
<Day>17</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed">
<Year>2009</Year>
<Month>12</Month>
<Day>17</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline">
<Year>2010</Year>
<Month>4</Month>
<Day>24</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20005699</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pii">S0960-8524(09)01556-9</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1016/j.biortech.2009.11.052</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Bois/explor/PhanerochaeteV1/Data/Main/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000587 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 000587 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Bois
   |area=    PhanerochaeteV1
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Curation
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     pubmed:20005699
   |texte=   Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) bark composition and degradation by fungi: potential substrate for bioremediation.
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Curation/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:20005699" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Curation/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a PhanerochaeteV1 

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.37.
Data generation: Fri Nov 13 18:33:39 2020. Site generation: Fri Nov 13 18:35:20 2020