Freezing tolerance of citrus, spinach, and petunia leaf tissue : osmotic adjustment and sensitivity to freeze induced cellular dehydration.
Identifieur interne : 000F64 ( PubMed/Curation ); précédent : 000F63; suivant : 000F65Freezing tolerance of citrus, spinach, and petunia leaf tissue : osmotic adjustment and sensitivity to freeze induced cellular dehydration.
Auteurs : G. Yelenosky [États-Unis] ; C L GuySource :
- Plant physiology [ 0032-0889 ] ; 1989.
Abstract
Seasonal variations in freezing tolerance, water content, water and osmotic potential, and levels of soluble sugars of leaves of field-grown Valencia orange (Citrus sinensis) trees were studied to determine the ability of citrus trees to cold acclimate under natural conditions. Controlled environmental studies of young potted citrus trees, spinach (Spinacia pleracea), and petunia (Petunia hybrids) were carried out to study the water relations during cold acclimation under less variable conditions. During the coolest weeks of the winter, leaf water content and osmotic potential of field-grown trees decreased about 20 to 25%, while soluble sugars increased by 100%. At the same time, freezing tolerance increased from lethal temperature for 50% (LT(50)) of -2.8 to -3.8 degrees C. In contrast, citrus leaves cold acclimated at a constant 10 degrees C in growth chambers were freezing tolerant to about -6 degrees C. The calculated freezing induced cellular dehydration at the LT(50) remained relatively constant for field-grown leaves throughout the year, but increased for leaves of plants cold acclimated at 10 degrees C in a controlled environment. Spinach leaves cold acclimated at 5 degrees C tolerated increased cellular dehydration compared to nonacclimated leaves. Cold acclimated petunia leaves increased in freezing tolerance by decreasing osmotic potential, but had no capacity to change cellular dehydration sensitivity. The result suggest that two cold acclimation mechanisms are involved in both citrus and spinach leaves and only one in petunia leaves. The common mechanism in all three species tested was a minor increase in tolerance (about -1 degrees C) resulting from low temperature induced osmotic adjustment, and the second in citrus and spinach was a noncolligative mechanism that increased the cellular resistance to freeze hydration.
PubMed: 16666563
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream PubMed, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000F64
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:16666563Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Freezing tolerance of citrus, spinach, and petunia leaf tissue : osmotic adjustment and sensitivity to freeze induced cellular dehydration.</title><author><name sortKey="Yelenosky, G" sort="Yelenosky, G" uniqKey="Yelenosky G" first="G" last="Yelenosky">G. Yelenosky</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Orlando, Florida 32803.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><placeName><region type="state">Floride</region></placeName><wicri:cityArea>United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Orlando</wicri:cityArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Guy, C L" sort="Guy, C L" uniqKey="Guy C" first="C L" last="Guy">C L Guy</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="1989">1989</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:16666563</idno><idno type="pmid">16666563</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000F64</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">000F64</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Freezing tolerance of citrus, spinach, and petunia leaf tissue : osmotic adjustment and sensitivity to freeze induced cellular dehydration.</title><author><name sortKey="Yelenosky, G" sort="Yelenosky, G" uniqKey="Yelenosky G" first="G" last="Yelenosky">G. Yelenosky</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Orlando, Florida 32803.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><placeName><region type="state">Floride</region></placeName><wicri:cityArea>United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Orlando</wicri:cityArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Guy, C L" sort="Guy, C L" uniqKey="Guy C" first="C L" last="Guy">C L Guy</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Plant physiology</title><idno type="ISSN">0032-0889</idno><imprint><date when="1989" type="published">1989</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Seasonal variations in freezing tolerance, water content, water and osmotic potential, and levels of soluble sugars of leaves of field-grown Valencia orange (Citrus sinensis) trees were studied to determine the ability of citrus trees to cold acclimate under natural conditions. Controlled environmental studies of young potted citrus trees, spinach (Spinacia pleracea), and petunia (Petunia hybrids) were carried out to study the water relations during cold acclimation under less variable conditions. During the coolest weeks of the winter, leaf water content and osmotic potential of field-grown trees decreased about 20 to 25%, while soluble sugars increased by 100%. At the same time, freezing tolerance increased from lethal temperature for 50% (LT(50)) of -2.8 to -3.8 degrees C. In contrast, citrus leaves cold acclimated at a constant 10 degrees C in growth chambers were freezing tolerant to about -6 degrees C. The calculated freezing induced cellular dehydration at the LT(50) remained relatively constant for field-grown leaves throughout the year, but increased for leaves of plants cold acclimated at 10 degrees C in a controlled environment. Spinach leaves cold acclimated at 5 degrees C tolerated increased cellular dehydration compared to nonacclimated leaves. Cold acclimated petunia leaves increased in freezing tolerance by decreasing osmotic potential, but had no capacity to change cellular dehydration sensitivity. The result suggest that two cold acclimation mechanisms are involved in both citrus and spinach leaves and only one in petunia leaves. The common mechanism in all three species tested was a minor increase in tolerance (about -1 degrees C) resulting from low temperature induced osmotic adjustment, and the second in citrus and spinach was a noncolligative mechanism that increased the cellular resistance to freeze hydration.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="PubMed-not-MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">16666563</PMID><DateCreated><Year>2010</Year><Month>6</Month><Day>29</Day></DateCreated><DateCompleted><Year>2010</Year><Month>06</Month><Day>29</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2010</Year><Month>9</Month><Day>15</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0032-0889</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>89</Volume><Issue>2</Issue><PubDate><Year>1989</Year><Month>Feb</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Plant physiology</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Plant Physiol.</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Freezing tolerance of citrus, spinach, and petunia leaf tissue : osmotic adjustment and sensitivity to freeze induced cellular dehydration.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>444-51</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText>Seasonal variations in freezing tolerance, water content, water and osmotic potential, and levels of soluble sugars of leaves of field-grown Valencia orange (Citrus sinensis) trees were studied to determine the ability of citrus trees to cold acclimate under natural conditions. Controlled environmental studies of young potted citrus trees, spinach (Spinacia pleracea), and petunia (Petunia hybrids) were carried out to study the water relations during cold acclimation under less variable conditions. During the coolest weeks of the winter, leaf water content and osmotic potential of field-grown trees decreased about 20 to 25%, while soluble sugars increased by 100%. At the same time, freezing tolerance increased from lethal temperature for 50% (LT(50)) of -2.8 to -3.8 degrees C. In contrast, citrus leaves cold acclimated at a constant 10 degrees C in growth chambers were freezing tolerant to about -6 degrees C. The calculated freezing induced cellular dehydration at the LT(50) remained relatively constant for field-grown leaves throughout the year, but increased for leaves of plants cold acclimated at 10 degrees C in a controlled environment. Spinach leaves cold acclimated at 5 degrees C tolerated increased cellular dehydration compared to nonacclimated leaves. Cold acclimated petunia leaves increased in freezing tolerance by decreasing osmotic potential, but had no capacity to change cellular dehydration sensitivity. The result suggest that two cold acclimation mechanisms are involved in both citrus and spinach leaves and only one in petunia leaves. The common mechanism in all three species tested was a minor increase in tolerance (about -1 degrees C) resulting from low temperature induced osmotic adjustment, and the second in citrus and spinach was a noncolligative mechanism that increased the cellular resistance to freeze hydration.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Yelenosky</LastName><ForeName>G</ForeName><Initials>G</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Orlando, Florida 32803.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Guy</LastName><ForeName>C L</ForeName><Initials>CL</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>ENG</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>Plant Physiol</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>0401224</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0032-0889</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CommentsCorrectionsList><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Biochim Biophys Acta. 1987 Jan 20;923(1):109-15</RefSource><PMID Version="1">2948571</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Cryobiology. 1985 Aug;22(4):367-77</RefSource><PMID Version="1">4028782</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Cryobiology. 1983 Jun;20(3):346-56</RefSource><PMID Version="1">6309479</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Oct;81(20):6373-7</RefSource><PMID Version="1">6593707</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Cryobiology. 1983 Feb;20(1):83-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">6831913</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Cryobiology. 1983 Feb;20(1):90-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">6831914</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Plant Physiol. 1939 Jan;14(1):93-112</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16653550</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Plant Physiol. 1957 May;32(3):237-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16654984</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Plant Physiol. 1975 Nov;56(5):707-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16659377</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Plant Physiol. 1978 Dec;62(6):899-901</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16660634</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Plant Physiol. 1979 Sep;64(3):425-7</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16660980</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Plant Physiol. 1980 Apr;65(4):614-7</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16661249</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Plant Physiol. 1983 Aug;72(4):938-44</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16663142</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Plant Physiol. 1987 Jul;84(3):868-71</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16665535</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Plant Physiol. 1987 Jul;84(3):872-8</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16665536</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Science. 1984 Feb 17;223(4637):701-3</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17841031</PMID></CommentsCorrections></CommentsCorrectionsList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>1989</Year><Month>2</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>0</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>1989</Year><Month>2</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>0</Hour><Minute>1</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>1989</Year><Month>2</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>0</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16666563</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC1055861</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Bois/explor/OrangerV1/Data/PubMed/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000F64 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 000F64 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Bois
|area= OrangerV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Curation
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:16666563
|texte= Freezing tolerance of citrus, spinach, and petunia leaf tissue : osmotic adjustment and sensitivity to freeze induced cellular dehydration.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:16666563" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a OrangerV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.25. |  |