Cellulose extraction from orange peel using sulfite digestion reagents.
Identifieur interne : 000686 ( PubMed/Curation ); précédent : 000685; suivant : 000687Cellulose extraction from orange peel using sulfite digestion reagents.
Auteurs : Ioan Bicu [Roumanie] ; Fanica MustataSource :
- Bioresource technology [ 1873-2976 ] ; 2011.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- chemical , analysis : Waste Products.
- chemical , chemistry : Indicators and Reagents, Sulfites.
- chemical , isolation & purification : Cellulose.
- chemistry : Citrus sinensis.
- methods : Biotechnology.
- Models, Chemical, Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared.
Abstract
Orange peel (OP) was used as raw material for cellulose extraction. Two different pulping reagents were used, sodium sulfite and sodium metabisulfite. The effect of the main process parameters, sulfite agent dosage and reaction duration, on cellulose yield was investigated. A central composite rotatable design involving two variables at five levels and response surface methodology were used for the optimization of cellulose recovery. Other two invariable parameters were reaction temperature and hydromodulus. The optimum yields, referred to the weight of double extracted OP, were 40.4% and 45.2% for sodium sulfite and sodium metabisulfite digestions, respectively. The crude celluloses were bleached with hypochlorite and oxygen. The physicochemical characterization data of these cellulose materials indicate good levels of purity, low crystallinities, good whitenesses, good water retention and moderate molecular weights. According to these specific properties the recovered celluloses could be used as fillers, water absorbents, or as raw materials for cellulose derivatives.
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.08.041
PubMed: 21893413
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream PubMed, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000686
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:21893413Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Cellulose extraction from orange peel using sulfite digestion reagents.</title><author><name sortKey="Bicu, Ioan" sort="Bicu, Ioan" uniqKey="Bicu I" first="Ioan" last="Bicu">Ioan Bicu</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Petru Poni Institute of Macromolecular Chemistry, Aleea Gr. Ghica Voda Nr. 41A, Iasi 700487, Romania. ibicu@icmpp.ro</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Roumanie</country><wicri:regionArea>Petru Poni Institute of Macromolecular Chemistry, Aleea Gr. Ghica Voda Nr. 41A, Iasi 700487</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Mustata, Fanica" sort="Mustata, Fanica" uniqKey="Mustata F" first="Fanica" last="Mustata">Fanica Mustata</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2011">2011</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:21893413</idno><idno type="pmid">21893413</idno><idno type="doi">10.1016/j.biortech.2011.08.041</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000686</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">000686</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Cellulose extraction from orange peel using sulfite digestion reagents.</title><author><name sortKey="Bicu, Ioan" sort="Bicu, Ioan" uniqKey="Bicu I" first="Ioan" last="Bicu">Ioan Bicu</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Petru Poni Institute of Macromolecular Chemistry, Aleea Gr. Ghica Voda Nr. 41A, Iasi 700487, Romania. ibicu@icmpp.ro</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Roumanie</country><wicri:regionArea>Petru Poni Institute of Macromolecular Chemistry, Aleea Gr. Ghica Voda Nr. 41A, Iasi 700487</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Mustata, Fanica" sort="Mustata, Fanica" uniqKey="Mustata F" first="Fanica" last="Mustata">Fanica Mustata</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Bioresource technology</title><idno type="eISSN">1873-2976</idno><imprint><date when="2011" type="published">2011</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Biotechnology (methods)</term><term>Cellulose (isolation & purification)</term><term>Citrus sinensis (chemistry)</term><term>Indicators and Reagents (chemistry)</term><term>Models, Chemical</term><term>Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared</term><term>Sulfites (chemistry)</term><term>Waste Products (analysis)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="analysis" xml:lang="en"><term>Waste Products</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="chemistry" xml:lang="en"><term>Indicators and Reagents</term><term>Sulfites</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="isolation & purification" xml:lang="en"><term>Cellulose</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="chemistry" xml:lang="en"><term>Citrus sinensis</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Biotechnology</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Models, Chemical</term><term>Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Orange peel (OP) was used as raw material for cellulose extraction. Two different pulping reagents were used, sodium sulfite and sodium metabisulfite. The effect of the main process parameters, sulfite agent dosage and reaction duration, on cellulose yield was investigated. A central composite rotatable design involving two variables at five levels and response surface methodology were used for the optimization of cellulose recovery. Other two invariable parameters were reaction temperature and hydromodulus. The optimum yields, referred to the weight of double extracted OP, were 40.4% and 45.2% for sodium sulfite and sodium metabisulfite digestions, respectively. The crude celluloses were bleached with hypochlorite and oxygen. The physicochemical characterization data of these cellulose materials indicate good levels of purity, low crystallinities, good whitenesses, good water retention and moderate molecular weights. According to these specific properties the recovered celluloses could be used as fillers, water absorbents, or as raw materials for cellulose derivatives.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">21893413</PMID><DateCreated><Year>2011</Year><Month>9</Month><Day>29</Day></DateCreated><DateCompleted><Year>2012</Year><Month>01</Month><Day>18</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2015</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>23</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1873-2976</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>102</Volume><Issue>21</Issue><PubDate><Year>2011</Year><Month>Nov</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Bioresource technology</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Bioresour. Technol.</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Cellulose extraction from orange peel using sulfite digestion reagents.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>10013-9</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1016/j.biortech.2011.08.041</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>Orange peel (OP) was used as raw material for cellulose extraction. Two different pulping reagents were used, sodium sulfite and sodium metabisulfite. The effect of the main process parameters, sulfite agent dosage and reaction duration, on cellulose yield was investigated. A central composite rotatable design involving two variables at five levels and response surface methodology were used for the optimization of cellulose recovery. Other two invariable parameters were reaction temperature and hydromodulus. The optimum yields, referred to the weight of double extracted OP, were 40.4% and 45.2% for sodium sulfite and sodium metabisulfite digestions, respectively. The crude celluloses were bleached with hypochlorite and oxygen. The physicochemical characterization data of these cellulose materials indicate good levels of purity, low crystallinities, good whitenesses, good water retention and moderate molecular weights. According to these specific properties the recovered celluloses could be used as fillers, water absorbents, or as raw materials for cellulose derivatives.</AbstractText><CopyrightInformation>Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</CopyrightInformation></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Bicu</LastName><ForeName>Ioan</ForeName><Initials>I</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Petru Poni Institute of Macromolecular Chemistry, Aleea Gr. Ghica Voda Nr. 41A, Iasi 700487, Romania. ibicu@icmpp.ro</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Mustata</LastName><ForeName>Fanica</ForeName><Initials>F</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>ENG</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2011</Year><Month>Aug</Month><Day>17</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>England</Country><MedlineTA>Bioresour Technol</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>9889523</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0960-8524</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D007202">Indicators and Reagents</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D013447">Sulfites</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D014866">Waste Products</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>4VON5FNS3C</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="C005200">sodium metabisulfite</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>9004-34-6</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D002482">Cellulose</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>VTK01UQK3G</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="C025026">sodium sulfite</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D001709" MajorTopicYN="N">Biotechnology</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D002482" MajorTopicYN="N">Cellulose</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000302" MajorTopicYN="Y">isolation & purification</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D032084" MajorTopicYN="N">Citrus sinensis</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000737" MajorTopicYN="Y">chemistry</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007202" MajorTopicYN="N">Indicators and Reagents</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000737" MajorTopicYN="N">chemistry</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008956" MajorTopicYN="N">Models, Chemical</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017550" MajorTopicYN="N">Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013447" MajorTopicYN="N">Sulfites</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000737" MajorTopicYN="Y">chemistry</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014866" MajorTopicYN="N">Waste Products</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000032" MajorTopicYN="Y">analysis</QualifierName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2011</Year><Month>6</Month><Day>8</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="revised"><Year>2011</Year><Month>8</Month><Day>8</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2011</Year><Month>8</Month><Day>10</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2011</Year><Month>9</Month><Day>7</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2011</Year><Month>9</Month><Day>7</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2012</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>19</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21893413</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">S0960-8524(11)01129-1</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1016/j.biortech.2011.08.041</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Bois/explor/OrangerV1/Data/PubMed/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000686 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 000686 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Bois
|area= OrangerV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Curation
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:21893413
|texte= Cellulose extraction from orange peel using sulfite digestion reagents.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:21893413" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a OrangerV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.25. |  |