Comparative transcriptome analysis of unripe and mid-ripe fruit of Mangifera indica (var. “Dashehari”) unravels ripening associated genes
Identifieur interne : 000477 ( Pmc/Corpus ); précédent : 000476; suivant : 000478Comparative transcriptome analysis of unripe and mid-ripe fruit of Mangifera indica (var. “Dashehari”) unravels ripening associated genes
Auteurs : Smriti Srivastava ; Rajesh K. Singh ; Garima Pathak ; Ridhi Goel ; Mehar Hasan Asif ; Aniruddha P. Sane ; Vidhu A. SaneSource :
- Scientific Reports [ 2045-2322 ] ; 2016.
Abstract
Ripening in mango is under a complex control of ethylene. In an effort to understand the complex spatio-temporal control of ripening we have made use of a popular N. Indian variety “Dashehari” This variety ripens from the stone inside towards the peel outside and forms jelly in the pulp in ripe fruits. Through a combination of 454 and Illumina sequencing, a transcriptomic analysis of gene expression from unripe and midripe stages have been performed in triplicates. Overall 74,312 unique transcripts with ≥1 FPKM were obtained. The transcripts related to 127 pathways were identified in “Dashehari” mango transcriptome by the KEGG analysis. These pathways ranged from detoxification, ethylene biosynthesis, carbon metabolism and aromatic amino acid degradation. The transcriptome study reveals differences not only in expression of softening associated genes but also those that govern ethylene biosynthesis and other nutritional characteristics. This study could help to develop ripening related markers for selective breeding to reduce the problems of excess jelly formation during softening in the “Dashehari” variety.
Url:
DOI: 10.1038/srep32557
PubMed: 27586495
PubMed Central: 5009307
Links to Exploration step
PMC:5009307Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Comparative transcriptome analysis of unripe and mid-ripe fruit of <italic>Mangifera indica (var</italic>. “Dashehari”) unravels ripening associated genes</title><author><name sortKey="Srivastava, Smriti" sort="Srivastava, Smriti" uniqKey="Srivastava S" first="Smriti" last="Srivastava">Smriti Srivastava</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="a1"><institution>CSIR- National Botanical Research Institute</institution>, Lucknow, 226001,<country>India</country></nlm:aff></affiliation><affiliation><nlm:aff id="a2"><institution>Academy of Scientific</institution><institution> and Innovative Research (AcSIR)</institution>, Anusandhan Bhawan, 2 Rafi Marg, New Delhi, 110001,<country>India</country></nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Singh, Rajesh K" sort="Singh, Rajesh K" uniqKey="Singh R" first="Rajesh K." last="Singh">Rajesh K. Singh</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="a3"><institution>Umeå Plant Science Centre</institution>, Umea,<country>Sweden</country></nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Pathak, Garima" sort="Pathak, Garima" uniqKey="Pathak G" first="Garima" last="Pathak">Garima Pathak</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="a1"><institution>CSIR- National Botanical Research Institute</institution>, Lucknow, 226001,<country>India</country></nlm:aff></affiliation><affiliation><nlm:aff id="a2"><institution>Academy of Scientific</institution><institution> and Innovative Research (AcSIR)</institution>, Anusandhan Bhawan, 2 Rafi Marg, New Delhi, 110001,<country>India</country></nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Goel, Ridhi" sort="Goel, Ridhi" uniqKey="Goel R" first="Ridhi" last="Goel">Ridhi Goel</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="a1"><institution>CSIR- National Botanical Research Institute</institution>, Lucknow, 226001,<country>India</country></nlm:aff></affiliation><affiliation><nlm:aff id="a2"><institution>Academy of Scientific</institution><institution> and Innovative Research (AcSIR)</institution>, Anusandhan Bhawan, 2 Rafi Marg, New Delhi, 110001,<country>India</country></nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Asif, Mehar Hasan" sort="Asif, Mehar Hasan" uniqKey="Asif M" first="Mehar Hasan" last="Asif">Mehar Hasan Asif</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="a1"><institution>CSIR- National Botanical Research Institute</institution>, Lucknow, 226001,<country>India</country></nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Sane, Aniruddha P" sort="Sane, Aniruddha P" uniqKey="Sane A" first="Aniruddha P." last="Sane">Aniruddha P. Sane</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="a1"><institution>CSIR- National Botanical Research Institute</institution>, Lucknow, 226001,<country>India</country></nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Sane, Vidhu A" sort="Sane, Vidhu A" uniqKey="Sane V" first="Vidhu A." last="Sane">Vidhu A. Sane</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="a1"><institution>CSIR- National Botanical Research Institute</institution>, Lucknow, 226001,<country>India</country></nlm:aff></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno><idno type="pmid">27586495</idno><idno type="pmc">5009307</idno><idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5009307</idno><idno type="RBID">PMC:5009307</idno><idno type="doi">10.1038/srep32557</idno><date when="2016">2016</date><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">000477</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a" type="main">Comparative transcriptome analysis of unripe and mid-ripe fruit of <italic>Mangifera indica (var</italic>. “Dashehari”) unravels ripening associated genes</title><author><name sortKey="Srivastava, Smriti" sort="Srivastava, Smriti" uniqKey="Srivastava S" first="Smriti" last="Srivastava">Smriti Srivastava</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="a1"><institution>CSIR- National Botanical Research Institute</institution>, Lucknow, 226001,<country>India</country></nlm:aff></affiliation><affiliation><nlm:aff id="a2"><institution>Academy of Scientific</institution><institution> and Innovative Research (AcSIR)</institution>, Anusandhan Bhawan, 2 Rafi Marg, New Delhi, 110001,<country>India</country></nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Singh, Rajesh K" sort="Singh, Rajesh K" uniqKey="Singh R" first="Rajesh K." last="Singh">Rajesh K. Singh</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="a3"><institution>Umeå Plant Science Centre</institution>, Umea,<country>Sweden</country></nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Pathak, Garima" sort="Pathak, Garima" uniqKey="Pathak G" first="Garima" last="Pathak">Garima Pathak</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="a1"><institution>CSIR- National Botanical Research Institute</institution>, Lucknow, 226001,<country>India</country></nlm:aff></affiliation><affiliation><nlm:aff id="a2"><institution>Academy of Scientific</institution><institution> and Innovative Research (AcSIR)</institution>, Anusandhan Bhawan, 2 Rafi Marg, New Delhi, 110001,<country>India</country></nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Goel, Ridhi" sort="Goel, Ridhi" uniqKey="Goel R" first="Ridhi" last="Goel">Ridhi Goel</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="a1"><institution>CSIR- National Botanical Research Institute</institution>, Lucknow, 226001,<country>India</country></nlm:aff></affiliation><affiliation><nlm:aff id="a2"><institution>Academy of Scientific</institution><institution> and Innovative Research (AcSIR)</institution>, Anusandhan Bhawan, 2 Rafi Marg, New Delhi, 110001,<country>India</country></nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Asif, Mehar Hasan" sort="Asif, Mehar Hasan" uniqKey="Asif M" first="Mehar Hasan" last="Asif">Mehar Hasan Asif</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="a1"><institution>CSIR- National Botanical Research Institute</institution>, Lucknow, 226001,<country>India</country></nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Sane, Aniruddha P" sort="Sane, Aniruddha P" uniqKey="Sane A" first="Aniruddha P." last="Sane">Aniruddha P. Sane</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="a1"><institution>CSIR- National Botanical Research Institute</institution>, Lucknow, 226001,<country>India</country></nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Sane, Vidhu A" sort="Sane, Vidhu A" uniqKey="Sane V" first="Vidhu A." last="Sane">Vidhu A. Sane</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="a1"><institution>CSIR- National Botanical Research Institute</institution>, Lucknow, 226001,<country>India</country></nlm:aff></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Scientific Reports</title><idno type="eISSN">2045-2322</idno><imprint><date when="2016">2016</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p>Ripening in mango is under a complex control of ethylene. In an effort to understand the complex spatio-temporal control of ripening we have made use of a popular N. Indian variety “Dashehari” This variety ripens from the stone inside towards the peel outside and forms jelly in the pulp in ripe fruits. Through a combination of 454 and Illumina sequencing, a transcriptomic analysis of gene expression from unripe and midripe stages have been performed in triplicates. Overall 74,312 unique transcripts with ≥1 FPKM were obtained. The transcripts related to 127 pathways were identified in “Dashehari” mango transcriptome by the KEGG analysis. These pathways ranged from detoxification, ethylene biosynthesis, carbon metabolism and aromatic amino acid degradation. The transcriptome study reveals differences not only in expression of softening associated genes but also those that govern ethylene biosynthesis and other nutritional characteristics. This study could help to develop ripening related markers for selective breeding to reduce the problems of excess jelly formation during softening in the “Dashehari” variety.</p></div></front><back><div1 type="bibliography"><listBibl><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Singh, Z" uniqKey="Singh Z">Z. Singh</name></author><author><name sortKey="Singh, R K" uniqKey="Singh R">R. K. Singh</name></author><author><name sortKey="Sane, V A" uniqKey="Sane V">V. A. Sane</name></author><author><name sortKey="Nath, P" uniqKey="Nath P">P. Nath</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Reddy, Y T N" uniqKey="Reddy Y">Y. T. N. Reddy</name></author><author><name sortKey="Srivastava, G C" uniqKey="Srivastava G">G. C. Srivastava</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Viruel, M A" uniqKey="Viruel M">M. A. Viruel</name></author><author><name sortKey="Escribano, P" uniqKey="Escribano P">P. Escribano</name></author><author><name sortKey="Barbieri, M" uniqKey="Barbieri M">M. Barbieri</name></author><author><name sortKey="Ferri, M" uniqKey="Ferri M">M. Ferri</name></author><author><name sortKey="Hormaza, J I" uniqKey="Hormaza J">J. I. Hormaza</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Wu, H X" uniqKey="Wu H">H. X. Wu</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Dautt Castro, M" uniqKey="Dautt Castro M">M. Dautt-Castro</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Azim, M K" uniqKey="Azim M">M. K. Azim</name></author><author><name sortKey="Khan, I A" uniqKey="Khan I">I. A. Khan</name></author><author><name sortKey="Zhang, Y" uniqKey="Zhang Y">Y. Zhang</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Sane, V A" uniqKey="Sane V">V. A. Sane</name></author><author><name sortKey="Chourasia, A" uniqKey="Chourasia A">A. Chourasia</name></author><author><name sortKey="Nath, P" uniqKey="Nath P">P. Nath</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Chourasia, A" uniqKey="Chourasia A">A. Chourasia</name></author><author><name sortKey="Sane, V A" uniqKey="Sane V">V. A. Sane</name></author><author><name sortKey="Nath, P" uniqKey="Nath P">P. Nath</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Chourasia, A" uniqKey="Chourasia A">A. Chourasia</name></author><author><name sortKey="Sane, V A" uniqKey="Sane V">V. A. Sane</name></author><author><name sortKey="Singh, R K" uniqKey="Singh R">R. K. Singh</name></author><author><name sortKey="Nath, P" uniqKey="Nath P">P. Nath</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Singh, R K" uniqKey="Singh R">R. K. Singh</name></author><author><name sortKey="Sane, V A" uniqKey="Sane V">V. A. Sane</name></author><author><name sortKey="Misra, A" uniqKey="Misra A">A. Misra</name></author><author><name sortKey="Ali, S A" uniqKey="Ali S">S. A. Ali</name></author><author><name sortKey="Nath, P" uniqKey="Nath P">P. Nath</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Singh, R K" uniqKey="Singh R">R. K. Singh</name></author><author><name sortKey="Ali, S A" uniqKey="Ali S">S. A. Ali</name></author><author><name sortKey="Nath, P" uniqKey="Nath P">P. Nath</name></author><author><name sortKey="Sane, V A" uniqKey="Sane V">V. A. Sane</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Ravanel, S P" uniqKey="Ravanel S">S. P. Ravanel</name></author><author><name sortKey="Gakiere, B" uniqKey="Gakiere B">B. Gakière</name></author><author><name sortKey="Job, D" uniqKey="Job D">D. Job</name></author><author><name sortKey="Douce, R" uniqKey="Douce R">R. Douce</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Yang, S F" uniqKey="Yang S">S. F. Yang</name></author><author><name sortKey="Hoffman, N E" uniqKey="Hoffman N">N. E. Hoffman</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Kende, H" uniqKey="Kende H">H. Kende</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Lin, Z" uniqKey="Lin Z">Z. Lin</name></author><author><name sortKey="Zhong, S" uniqKey="Zhong S">S. Zhong</name></author><author><name sortKey="Grierson, D" uniqKey="Grierson D">D. Grierson</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Nakatsuka, A" uniqKey="Nakatsuka A">A. Nakatsuka</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Barry, C S" uniqKey="Barry C">C. S. Barry</name></author><author><name sortKey="Llop Tous, M I" uniqKey="Llop Tous M">M. I. Llop-Tous</name></author><author><name sortKey="Grierson, D" uniqKey="Grierson D">D. Grierson</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Li, T" uniqKey="Li T">T. Li</name></author><author><name sortKey="Tan, D" uniqKey="Tan D">D. Tan</name></author><author><name sortKey="Yang, X" uniqKey="Yang X">X. Yang</name></author><author><name sortKey="Wang, A" uniqKey="Wang A">A. Wang</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Nakano, T" uniqKey="Nakano T">T. Nakano</name></author><author><name sortKey="Suzuki, K" uniqKey="Suzuki K">K. Suzuki</name></author><author><name sortKey="Fujimura, T" uniqKey="Fujimura T">T. Fujimura</name></author><author><name sortKey="Shinshi, H" uniqKey="Shinshi H">H. Shinshi</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Zhong, S" uniqKey="Zhong S">S. Zhong</name></author><author><name sortKey="Lin, Z" uniqKey="Lin Z">Z. Lin</name></author><author><name sortKey="Grierson, D" uniqKey="Grierson D">D. Grierson</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Binnie, J E" uniqKey="Binnie J">J. E. Binnie</name></author><author><name sortKey="Mcmanus, M T" uniqKey="Mcmanus M">M. T. McManus</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Inaba, A" uniqKey="Inaba A">A. Inaba</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Trivellini, A" uniqKey="Trivellini A">A. Trivellini</name></author><author><name sortKey="Ferrante, A" uniqKey="Ferrante A">A. Ferrante</name></author><author><name sortKey="Vernieri, P" uniqKey="Vernieri P">P. Vernieri</name></author><author><name sortKey="Serra, G" uniqKey="Serra G">G. Serra</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Winterhagen, P" uniqKey="Winterhagen P">P. Winterhagen</name></author><author><name sortKey="Hagemann, M H" uniqKey="Hagemann M">M. H. Hagemann</name></author><author><name sortKey="Wunsche, J N" uniqKey="Wunsche J">J. N. Wünsche</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Roberts, M R" uniqKey="Roberts M">M. R. Roberts</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Yao, Y" uniqKey="Yao Y">Y. Yao</name></author><author><name sortKey="Du, Y" uniqKey="Du Y">Y. Du</name></author><author><name sortKey="Jiang, L" uniqKey="Jiang L">L. Jiang</name></author><author><name sortKey="Liu, J Y" uniqKey="Liu J">J. Y. Liu</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Chang, I F" uniqKey="Chang I">I. F. Chang</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Li, M Y" uniqKey="Li M">M. Y. Li</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Brummell, D A" uniqKey="Brummell D">D. A. Brummell</name></author><author><name sortKey="Harpster, M H" uniqKey="Harpster M">M. H. Harpster</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Asha, Sane V A" uniqKey="Asha S">Sane, V. A. Asha</name></author><author><name sortKey="Sane, A P" uniqKey="Sane A">A. P. Sane</name></author><author><name sortKey="Nath, P" uniqKey="Nath P">P. Nath</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Chaurasia, A" uniqKey="Chaurasia A">A. Chaurasia</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Singh, R K" uniqKey="Singh R">R. K. Singh</name></author><author><name sortKey="Srivastava, S" uniqKey="Srivastava S">S. Srivastava</name></author><author><name sortKey="Sane, V A" uniqKey="Sane V">V. A. Sane</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Prescott, A G" uniqKey="Prescott A">A. G. Prescott</name></author><author><name sortKey="John, P" uniqKey="John P">P. John</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Norris, S R" uniqKey="Norris S">S. R. Norris</name></author><author><name sortKey="Shen, X" uniqKey="Shen X">X. Shen</name></author><author><name sortKey="Della Penna, D" uniqKey="Della Penna D">D. Della Penna</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Pandit, S S" uniqKey="Pandit S">S. S. Pandit</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Echeverria, G" uniqKey="Echeverria G">G. Echeverria</name></author><author><name sortKey="Graell, J" uniqKey="Graell J">J. Graell</name></author><author><name sortKey="Lopez, M L" uniqKey="Lopez M">M. L. Lopez</name></author><author><name sortKey="Lara, I" uniqKey="Lara I">I. Lara</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Asif, M H" uniqKey="Asif M">M. H. Asif</name></author><author><name sortKey="Dhawan, P" uniqKey="Dhawan P">P. Dhawan</name></author><author><name sortKey="Nath, P" uniqKey="Nath P">P. Nath</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Benjamini, Y" uniqKey="Benjamini Y">Y. Benjamini</name></author><author><name sortKey="Hochberg, Y" uniqKey="Hochberg Y">Y. Hochberg</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Moriya, Y" uniqKey="Moriya Y">Y. Moriya</name></author><author><name sortKey="Itoh, M" uniqKey="Itoh M">M. Itoh</name></author><author><name sortKey="Okuda, S" uniqKey="Okuda S">S. Okuda</name></author><author><name sortKey="Yoshizawa, A C" uniqKey="Yoshizawa A">A. C. Yoshizawa</name></author><author><name sortKey="Kanehisa, M" uniqKey="Kanehisa M">M. Kanehisa</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Zhou, Du" uniqKey="Zhou D">Du Zhou</name></author><author><name sortKey="Xin, Zhou" uniqKey="Xin Z">Zhou Xin</name></author><author><name sortKey="Yi, Ling" uniqKey="Yi L">Ling Yi</name></author><author><name sortKey="Zhenhai, Zhang" uniqKey="Zhenhai Z">Zhang Zhenhai</name></author><author><name sortKey="Zhen, Su" uniqKey="Zhen S">Su Zhen</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Livak, K J" uniqKey="Livak K">K. J. Livak</name></author><author><name sortKey="Schmittgen, T D" uniqKey="Schmittgen T">T. D. Schmittgen</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Jozefczuk, J" uniqKey="Jozefczuk J">J. Jozefczuk</name></author><author><name sortKey="Adjaye, J" uniqKey="Adjaye J">J. Adjaye</name></author></analytic></biblStruct></listBibl></div1></back></TEI><pmc article-type="research-article"><pmc-dir>properties open_access</pmc-dir>
<front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">Sci Rep</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="iso-abbrev">Sci Rep</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Scientific Reports</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2045-2322</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Nature Publishing Group</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="pmid">27586495</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="pmc">5009307</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="pii">srep32557</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/srep32557</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Comparative transcriptome analysis of unripe and mid-ripe fruit of <italic>Mangifera indica (var</italic>. “Dashehari”) unravels ripening associated genes</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Srivastava</surname><given-names>Smriti</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="a1">1</xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="a2">2</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Singh</surname><given-names>Rajesh K.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="a3">3</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Pathak</surname><given-names>Garima</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="a1">1</xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="a2">2</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Goel</surname><given-names>Ridhi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="a1">1</xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="a2">2</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Asif</surname><given-names>Mehar Hasan</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="a1">1</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Sane</surname><given-names>Aniruddha P.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="a1">1</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Sane</surname><given-names>Vidhu A.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c1">a</xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="a1">1</xref></contrib><aff id="a1"><label>1</label><institution>CSIR- National Botanical Research Institute</institution>, Lucknow, 226001,<country>India</country></aff><aff id="a2"><label>2</label><institution>Academy of Scientific</institution><institution> and Innovative Research (AcSIR)</institution>, Anusandhan Bhawan, 2 Rafi Marg, New Delhi, 110001,<country>India</country></aff><aff id="a3"><label>3</label><institution>Umeå Plant Science Centre</institution>, Umea,<country>Sweden</country></aff></contrib-group><author-notes><corresp id="c1"><label>a</label><email>sanevidhu@rediffmail.com</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>02</day><month>09</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>6</volume><elocation-id>32557</elocation-id><history><date date-type="received"><day>07</day><month>04</month><year>2016</year></date><date date-type="accepted"><day>09</day><month>08</month><year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright © 2016, The Author(s)</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2016</copyright-year><copyright-holder>The Author(s)</copyright-holder><license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><pmc-comment>author-paid</pmc-comment>
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>Ripening in mango is under a complex control of ethylene. In an effort to understand the complex spatio-temporal control of ripening we have made use of a popular N. Indian variety “Dashehari” This variety ripens from the stone inside towards the peel outside and forms jelly in the pulp in ripe fruits. Through a combination of 454 and Illumina sequencing, a transcriptomic analysis of gene expression from unripe and midripe stages have been performed in triplicates. Overall 74,312 unique transcripts with ≥1 FPKM were obtained. The transcripts related to 127 pathways were identified in “Dashehari” mango transcriptome by the KEGG analysis. These pathways ranged from detoxification, ethylene biosynthesis, carbon metabolism and aromatic amino acid degradation. The transcriptome study reveals differences not only in expression of softening associated genes but also those that govern ethylene biosynthesis and other nutritional characteristics. This study could help to develop ripening related markers for selective breeding to reduce the problems of excess jelly formation during softening in the “Dashehari” variety.</p></abstract></article-meta></front><body><p>Mango (<italic>Mangifera indica</italic> L.) is one of the major fruit crops of the tropics and subtropics of Asia. It belongs to the family <italic>Anacardiaceae</italic> of order Sapindale and is known to evolve from tropical rainforests of south and south-east Asia<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b1">1</xref>. The fruit is a favourite of masses due to its delicious taste, aroma and high nutritive value. Mango fruit is consumed in both raw and ripe forms<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b2">2</xref>. India is the top Mango growing country and accounts for 42.06% of world’s production. Despite being the largest producer of fruit, India exported only 41,000 tonnes of Mango in 2013–14 as fresh fruit accounting for about 0.4% of production. In other words, its dominance as the largest producer is poorly translated into international trade. Due to faulty post-harvest practices during harvesting, packaging and storage approximately 20–25% of fruit are wasted. Major challenges affecting mango trade are short shelf life, high susceptibility to chilling injury, postharvest diseases and consumer demand for improved fruit quality. This wastage can be reduced to some an extent through proper understanding of fruit ripening using scientific methods.</p><p>Mango is an allotetraploid (2n = 40) with a predicted genome size of approximately 450 MB<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b3">3</xref>. The mango genome sequence is not available yet. However, with the advent of next generation sequencing techniques like Illumina HiSeq2000 and Roche 454, some reports have started pouring in to enrich our knowledge about the mango transcriptome. Wu <italic>et al.</italic>, in 2014 have used Chinese variety “Zill” and performed transcriptomic and proteomic analysis utilizing 4 different developmental stages of fruit<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b4">4</xref>. Although, this study deals with fruit ripening it does not provide any concrete information regarding gene families involved in fruit ripening. Dautt-Castro <italic>et al.</italic> have also reported a transcriptomic study using mango fruit mesocarp from “Kent” variety<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b5">5</xref>. They found a differential expression pattern of several ripening related genes between unripe and ripe mangoes. Azim <italic>et al.</italic>, have sequenced the mango chloroplast genome<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b6">6</xref>. The group used “<italic>Langra”</italic> variety of mango and obtained a circular map of the chloroplast genome with 151,173 basepairs but they failed to obtain a complete chloroplast DNA sequence.</p><p>India is a land of mangoes with nearly 1,000 different varieties grown in different parts of the country; however, 20 varieties are grown commercially. Commercial varieties that are grown in India include Alphonso, Dashehari, Langra, Chausa, Banganapalli, Kesar etc. “Alphonso” is the main variety which is exported. “Dashehari” is very popular in northern India as it is fibreless, delicious in taste with mild aroma and has a very high pulp to stone ratio. However, the consumption of this variety is limited majorly to India because of the rapid and uneven ripening. “Dashehari” ripens from the stone towards the periphery. There is jelly formation in the pulp near the stone at late ripe stage although it looks firm and good from outside. Our group has been working on “Dashehari” ripening for the last few years to understand ripening process<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b7">7</xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b8">8</xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b9">9</xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b10">10</xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b11">11</xref>. In the present study we report a detailed comparative transcriptomic analysis between two different stages (unripe and mid ripe) of ripening. Since jelly is formed in inner parts of the fruit we have chosen inner zones of unripe and ripe “Dashehari” fruit for transcriptomic analysis. For the real time validation of our data we have taken three stages unripe, midripe and ripe mangoes of “Dashehari”. From the present study several differentially expressed genes were identified that govern the process of ripening in “Dashehari” mangoes.</p><sec disp-level="1"><title>Results and Discussion</title><p>Ripening process of “Dashehari” mango was monitored during post harvest at room temperature. The colour of the fruit pulp changed gradually from whitish to dark yellow with the progression of ripening (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">Fig. 1a</xref>); however, peel colour remained green. The colour change was also accompanied with a decrease in fruit firmness from 13.9 ± 2.19 N in unripe fruit to 1.6 ± 1.01 N in the ripened fruit (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">Fig. 1b</xref>).</p><sec disp-level="2"><title>Transcriptome sequencing and assembly</title><p>The transcriptome of the fruit pulp of inner zones of unripe and mid ripe stages of “Dashehari” mango was sequenced using Illumina Hi-Seq and 454 Titanium GS-FLX. The sequencing was carried out in triplicates. The raw reads were quality filtered and assembled using the Trinity programme. 24,339,498 raw reads obtained from Illumina sequencing were trimmed down to 23,154,701 reads using Trimmomatic tool. The alignment summary of reads on assembled transcriptome is given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table 1</xref>. Overall 74,312 unique transcripts with ≥1 FPKM were obtained. Hybrid assembly was carried out with the trimmed reads (from 454 pyrosequencing and from Illumnina Hi-Seq) using Trinity. A total of 71,733 contigs were assembled with an average length of 942 bp (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">Fig. 2a</xref>) and 44.6% GC content (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">Fig. 2b</xref>). The transcripts with p-value <0.01 (from DESeq program) are shown in red (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">Fig. 2</xref> c). On the whole 46,412 (~74.68%) of assembled transcripts had at least one significant hit in NCBI NR database. Around 59% of the transcripts found using Blastx had confidence level of at least 1e<sup>−10</sup>, which indicates high protein sequence similarity (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">Fig. 2d</xref>).</p></sec><sec disp-level="2"><title>Annotation and functional characterisation</title><p>The total transcripts were annotated against UniProt and NCBI NR database. According to the UniProt and NR databases 34,934 and 44,472 genes were annotated respectively. A total of 25,614 contigs showed no significant hits in any of the database and could be novel mango specific genes. The transcriptomes from other varieties of mango have been reported from pulp and pericarp of “Zill” mango, mesocarp of “Kent” variety and leaf of “Langra”<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b4">4</xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b5">5</xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b6">6</xref>. A similar number of genes were also reported in other transcriptomic studies carried out in pulp tissue of “Zill” and “Kent” varieties (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">Table 2</xref>). Smaller number of unigenes was reported in leaf transcriptome of “Langra” variety of mango<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b6">6</xref>. This suggests that a large number of genes are conserved and active in different varieties of mango. Going further with our results, blastx against NR database was performed at <italic>E</italic>-value 10<sup>−10</sup>. Most of the top hits were from <italic>Citrus</italic> sp with <italic>Citrus sinensis</italic> and <italic>Citrus clementina</italic> being the top two hits out of 15 organisms (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">Fig. 3</xref>). A total of 59.05% genes were annotated by Citrus sp. (approximately 26,000 out of total 44,472 contigs showed matches with Citrus sp). The order of the top 15 organisms varied from the data of “Kent” variety of Mango indicating differences in the sequences of different varieties<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b5">5</xref>. In this study we compared our “Dashehari” transcriptome data mainly with “Kent” data because both varieties have different natural habitat, “Kent” being an American one whereas “Dashehari” is a North Indian variety. The time period of ripening of both varieties is different, “Dashehari” ripens in summers and “Kent” is available during monsoons. The ripened “Dashehari” is green from the outside (peel is green) but in the case of “Kent” variety, the peel colour of ripened mango varies from being greenish red or yellow. We compared the assembled data of “Kent” variety with the total transcripts obtained from our study and found 58,934 contigs matched with “Kent” variety with sequence identity of 97% and 12,799 contigs were specific to the “Dashehari”. The “Dashehari” transcripts were also annotated using GO terms and 22,632 transcripts mapped to 45,262 significant GO terms. These were divided into the three categories i.e., biological processes, molecular function and cellular components. The maximum number of GO terms mapped to regulation of transcription followed by translation and carbohydrate metabolism (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">Fig. 4</xref>). According to the eggNOG database 1,109 genes showed functional annotation. The highly expressed protein families belonged to protein kinases, cytochrome P450s, mitochondrial carrier proteins, protein phosphatases among others, indicating active metabolism in mango fruit during ripening. A total of 47 plant transcription factor families were identified when queried against the plant transcription factor database. Of these the MYB, bHLH, WRKY, HSF, NAC, bZIP, ERF were some of the highly expressed transcription factors. Differential regulation of gene family members was observed in nearly all of the plant transcription factor families (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">Supplementary Table S1</xref>).</p><p>The KEGG analysis showed that the genes for most of the pathways could be mapped to the mango transcriptome and the transcripts related to 127 pathways were identified in the “Dashehari” mango transcriptome. The maximum number of matches was from the <italic>Citrus clementina</italic> pathway and genes for many of the pathways were mapped for over more than 90% coverage. The pathway enrichment analysis was done using the KOBAS v2.0 and 37 pathways were significantly enriched with a p-value of <0.1. These pathways ranged from detoxification, ethylene biosynthesis, carbon metabolism and aromatic amino acid degradation (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">Supplementary Table S2</xref>).</p></sec><sec disp-level="2"><title>Differential gene expression and functional characterisation</title><p>Fruit ripening is a complex process and requires the coordinated expression of a wide number of genes. At this stage the fruit is metabolically active and a large number of genes are differentially expressed. The ripening process involves drastic changes in expression of genes related to ethylene biosynthesis and signal transduction, cell wall loosening and expansion, flavour and pigment formation. The differential gene expression was studied in the unripe and midripe stages of “Dashehari” fruit. 1447 genes were up-regulated (>2 fold, p-value <0.05) and 2003 genes were down-regulated (≤2 fold, p-value <0.05) in midripe stage as compared to unripe stage. The top 100 differentially expressed genes are represented in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">Supplementary Fig. S1</xref>. The GO analysis of the differentially regulated genes revealed that genes for the metal ion binding, cell wall metabolism, oxidoreductase activity among others were up-regulated and genes for abiotic stress, transport, carbohydrate metabolism were down-regulated (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 3</xref>).</p></sec><sec disp-level="2"><title>Genes related to ethylene biosynthesis and signaling</title><p>S-adenosyl methionine (SAM) is the most important methyl contributor in plant system and many biochemical pathways<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b12">12</xref>. The first committed step of ethylene biosynthesis is the conversion of SAM to 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic-acid (ACC) by ACC synthase. Thus SAM acts as the precursor for ethylene biosynthesis<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b13">13</xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b14">14</xref>. Nearly 80% of the total cellular methionine gets converted to SAM by the action of SAM synthetase at the expense of ATP<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b12">12</xref>. Three SAM synthetases (c31067, c27773 and c47433) were identified from “Dashehari” transcriptome. All of them were 2–3 fold down-regulated in mid ripe stage as compared to unripe one (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">Fig. 5a</xref>).</p><p>ACC synthase (ACS) and ACC oxidase (ACO) are the key regulators of ethylene biosynthesis in plants and changes in the expression of these genes govern the ethylene production. In this study 6 genes for ACS were identified (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">Fig. 5b</xref>). Only one of these six (c18584_g2_i1) was full length and the rest (five) were partial homologs, out of which c50867 and c32921 showed 2–3 fold down-regulation (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">Supplementary Fig. S2a</xref>). In the “Kent” variety, two ACSs were identified with no change in expression profile between ripe and unripe stage<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b5">5</xref>. No significantly up-regulated ACS homolog was found in the transcriptome study. Similar to our findings, none of the ACS homolog was found differentially up-regulated in ripe mango in “Kent” transcriptome. It is possible that ACS homologs are differentially up-regulated in early ripening stages when ethylene is required to start ripening process. In our case we have used mid ripe stage (3<sup>rd</sup>, 4<sup>th</sup> day post harvest) and it is possible that ACS peak was attained on day one. Citrus, showing maximum similarity with mango transcriptome, also has 6 ACSs (information gathered from Citrus Genome Database). Nine ACS genes (<italic>LeACS1A</italic>, <italic>B</italic> and <italic>LeACS2</italic> to <italic>LeACS8</italic>) have been reported from tomato<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b15">15</xref>, where only <italic>LeACS1A</italic>, <italic>LeACS2</italic>, <italic>LeACS4</italic>, and <italic>LeACS6</italic> were expressed in mature and ripening fruit with differential transcript patterns<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b16">16</xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b17">17</xref>. By exploring the apple whole genome in 2013, Li <italic>et al.</italic> identified 19 <italic>ACS</italic> genes<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b18">18</xref>. Out of these, six genes were expressed only in fruit. They speculated that different ACSs specifically expressing in fruit might further be categorised to work in System 1 or system 2 of ethylene biosynthesis<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b18">18</xref>.</p><p>Seven contigs related to ACO were identified in the “Dashehari” transcriptome data. ACO is a terminal enzyme of ethylene biosynthetic pathway. Out of these 7contigs only c23735 and c22984 were significantly up-regulated (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">Fig. 5c</xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">Fig. S2b</xref>). Three ACC oxidase genes were reported to up-regulate in ripe “Kent” mango<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b5">5</xref>. Mango ACO genes, therefore, also belong to a small gene family like Arabidopsis, Citrus (5 ACOs each) and tomato (6 ACOs)<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b19">19</xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b20">20</xref>. ACOs from different fruits have been shown to have tissue and developmental specific expression. One of the three identified isoforms of ACO gene <italic>Md-ACO1</italic> in apple (<italic>Malus domestica</italic> cv. Royal Gala), has been shown to be restricted to fruit tissues, with optimal expression in ripening fruit<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b21">21</xref>. The studies on climacteric fruits (tomato and banana) have shown a differential feedback regulation of ACS and ACO between pre-climacteric and ripening fruits and also between different tissues<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b16">16</xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b22">22</xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b23">23</xref>.</p><p>The ethylene signal is perceived and transmitted by complex signal transduction pathway involving many genes. These include the ethylene receptors and ethylene responsive transcription factors that ultimately result in regulation of ethylene related genes. In Arabidopsis there are 5 ethylene receptors and one CTR<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b19">19</xref>, in tomato 8 ethylene receptors and 3 CTR<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b20">20</xref> and in Citrus 9 ethylene receptors have been reported (from citrus genome database). We could dig out 3 ethylene receptors (c26661, c29681 and c18873) from “Dashehari” transcriptome. Out of these 3 genes, contig c26661 was significantly up-regulated (~2 fold) in the mid ripe stage of fruit ripening (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">Fig. 5d</xref>). The two ERSs (c29681 and c18873) were also identified but change in expression was not significant in mid ripe stage as compared to unripe stage. Three ethylene receptors (two ETRs and one ERS) were also reported in the “Kent” variety of which two ETR homologs remained unchanged whereas one ERS showed down-regulation<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b5">5</xref>. In a recent report, different versions of the mango ethylene receptor <italic>MiERS1</italic> from Hôi’ cultivar were identified by Winterhagen <italic>et al.</italic><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b24">24</xref>. They suggested that in addition to <italic>MiERS1</italic>, two short versions of this receptor (<italic>MiERS1m</italic>, <italic>MiERS1s</italic>) are also present in mango. These short versions reveal deletions of crucial domains for protein function. Authors speculated that the short versions of <italic>ERS</italic>s might play a role either in the CTR1-dependent pathway by modifying the signal output in receptor complexes or via alternative signalling pathways.</p><p>Two contigs related to <italic>CTR1</italic> were identified in the transcriptome data though none of these showed any significant change in the expression during progression of ripening (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">Supplementary Fig. S3</xref>). In the variety “Kent”, only one <italic>CTR</italic> has been reported which shows down-regulation in ripe fruit with respect to unripe fruit. Arabidopsis has one <italic>CTR1</italic>. Interestingly, CTR1-like proteins (<italic>LeCTRs</italic>) in tomato are encoded by multigene families<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b20">20</xref>. All these <italic>LeCTRs</italic> could interact with ethylene receptors. Detailed studies are required to find out role of multiple <italic>CTRs</italic> and whether the different <italic>LeCTRs</italic> are functionally redundant or have unique roles in ethylene signalling<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b20">20</xref>.</p><p>We also found two isoforms of <italic>EIN3</italic>- a positive regulator of ethylene signalling pathway. Contig 23448_g2_i1 encoding EIN3 was up-regulated while the other was down regulated (23448_g1_i1) at P = 0.5 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">Fig. 5e</xref>). The presence and changes in the expression patterns of genes of ethylene signalling pathway between “Dashehari” and “Kent” indicate varietal differences and changes in ripening process between these two varieties. There were 44 ethylene responsive transcription factor genes that we observed in the total transcriptome, of these 39 belonged to the ERF family and 5 to the RAP family.</p><p>Plant 14-3-3s are conserved proteins that bind to a range of transcription factors and play role in many hormonal signal transduction pathways. In “Dashehari” transcriptome 10 contigs related to 14-3-3 were identified, however, only two genes showed significant differential expression in mid ripe stage (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">Supplementary Fig. S3</xref>). These proteins in recent years have been shown to affect ethylene signaling pathways<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b25">25</xref>. 14-3-3 proteins are shown to interact with (CTR1) in Arabidopsis. Rice and Arabidopsis 14-3-3 protein are associated with ACS<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b26">26</xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b27">27</xref>. Besides rice and Arabidopsis, four 14-3-3 proteins have been identified from banana and based on transcript analyses <italic>Ma-14-3-3a</italic> and <italic>Ma-14-3-3e</italic> genes were shown to be involved in regulating ethylene biosynthesis during ripening<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b28">28</xref>.</p></sec><sec disp-level="2"><title>Genes related to fruit softening</title><p>One of the most important changes occurring during ripening is loss of firmness. This softening is due to the loosening of the cell wall and degradation of the lamella mainly composed of pectins<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b29">29</xref>. The important cell wall loosening and degrading enzymes/proteins are Expansin (EXP), Polygalacturonase (PG), Pectate lyase (PL), Pectin methyl esterase (PME), Xyloglucan endoglucosyltassferase (XTH), endoglucanases and galactosidases etc. A total of 60 cell wall related genes were identified in the transcriptome of “Dashehari” mango and were differentially expressed. A large number of EXPs, XTHs and PLs showed differential transcript levels in unripe and midripe stages of mango.</p><p>Eleven expansin sequences were detected in the “Dashehari” transcriptome of which 3 expansin genes (contigs c25255, c17299, c16863) showed differential >2 fold up-regulation (7, 5, 5 fold respectively). Contig c25255 matched 100% with previously characterised ripening related expansin (<italic>MiExp1</italic>) from mango<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b7">7</xref>. c48577, c4539 encoding expansins on the other hand were down-regulated (5 and 2 fold respectively). The rest of the expansin genes did not show much change in expression during unripe and midripe stages of mango. Dautt-Castro <italic>et al.</italic> also reported five expansins which were up-regulated in ripe “Kent” fruit<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b5">5</xref>. In Zill mango, also expansin genes had increased expression during fruit ripening<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b4">4</xref>. It is possible that besides <italic>MiEXP1</italic> a minimum of two more expansins play a role in ripening associated softening. The down-regulated expansin genes might be involved in fruit development rather than ripening (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">Fig. 6a</xref>). Five expansins are reported in banana and only 2 (<italic>MiEXP1 and 2</italic>) play major role during ripening<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b30">30</xref>. Multiple genes related to fruit softening have also been identified from other dicot fruits such as apple, pear and strawberry. Simultaneous expression of multiple genes of the same family during softening suggests complexity of the softening process.</p><p>Pectins are major component of mango cell wall. Chaurasia <italic>et al.</italic> suggested that the pectate lyases could be the most important pectin degrading enzymes in mango and <italic>MiPel1</italic> expression levels increased during the course of fruit ripening<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b8">8</xref>. Transcriptome sequencing of mango suggested that there are at least 8 PLs and pectate lyase like genes of which 4 contigs (c7821, c20774, c15227, c27147) were up-regulated during ripening and the rest did not show any significant changes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">Fig. 6b</xref>). Dautt-Castro <italic>et al.</italic><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b5">5</xref> also reported 4 pectate lyases in the “Kent” variety<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b5">5</xref>. In the current study contig c27147 corresponding to <italic>MiPel1</italic> also showed increased expression in mid ripe stage as compared to unripe stage. The other pectin degrading enzyme polygalacturonse (PG) was also studied. In this study 5 PG genes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">Fig. 6c</xref>) were identified. Except for c19016, expression of other homologs remained unchanged in unripe and mid ripe stages of “Dashehari”. Interestingly, c19016 was significantly down-regulated at mid ripe stage. In an earlier study carried out in the lab “<italic>Dasheahri”</italic> had very little PG enzyme activity<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b31">31</xref>. This is in contrast to the observation made by Dautt-Castro <italic>et al.</italic>, for the “Kent” variety<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b5">5</xref>. The group reported 9 PG genes with significant up-regulation of six unigenes encoding PG during ripening. The changes in PG transcripts could possibly be due to the subtle changes in cell wall composition of the two varieties. We speculate that in “Dashehari”, PL might be the major pectin solubilising enzyme instead of PG and could be a reason of jelly formation at late ripe stage. Six genes encoding for PMEs were present in “Dashehari” transcriptome of which 3 (c32844, c30722, c43254) were 2–3 fold down-regulated (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">Fig. 6d</xref>). The activity of pectin methylesterase precedes the activity of PL and PG, hence it might be required during the early phase of transition to ripening and once the PL and PG become active the PME expression goes down. Endo-beta-glucanases are also considered important enzymes related to cell wall loosening. In the transcriptome of “Dashehari” fruit, 11 endo-beta-glucanases were identified, of these five were up-regulated during ripening (c27530, c48621, c27942, c45502 and c13537). Three genes were down-regulated (c32799, c33495, c7638) indicating their possible role more in fruit development rather than ripening (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">Fig. 6e</xref>). Contig id c27942 has identical sequence to that reported for previously characterised <italic>MiCel1</italic> from “Dashehari” and also shows the same expression profile<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b9">9</xref>.</p><p>Xyloglucan endotransglycosylase and transferases are important cell wall modifying enzymes which play important role in softening process of fruits like banana, tomato, apple etc. In the present study 17 genes were identified, of these two belonged to Xyloglucan transferase category and the rest were endotransglycosylases. Both xyloglucan transferases were down-regulated in the ripe stage. Out of 15 endotransglycosylases, three genes were up-regulated (c6594, c23621, c22673) and 3 were down-regulated (c4555, c49565, c38502), the rest did not show much change in their expression during ripening (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">Supplementary Fig. S5</xref>). The expression of XTHs was, however, not significantly changed in “Kent” variety<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b5">5</xref>.</p><p>A total of 26 galactosidase genes were identified in “Dashehari” fruit, of these 5 were alpha and the rest were beta galactosidases. Two beta-galactosidase genes were up-regulated (c28255, c23121), two were down-regulated (c30645, c21739) and the rest did not show any change in expression. Two alpha-glucosidase genes were significantly down-regulated (c9499, c21528), the expression of rest of the homologs remained unchanged (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">Supplementary Fig. S6</xref>). Unlike the “Kent” variety, galactosidase genes in “Dashehari” did not show significant differential change. No rhamnogalactouronan gene was identified in the “Dashehari”; however, in the “Kent” variety the RGL1 gene was highly expressed during ripening<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b5">5</xref>. The differential expression changes in various cell wall modifying enzymes in “Dashehari” and “Kent” varieties further suggest differences in cell wall composition of these two varieties and need to be studied in detail in order to develop varieties with better shelf life.</p></sec><sec disp-level="2"><title>Genes related to flavour and colour</title><p>Flavour (aroma and taste) is due to the blending of acidity and aroma volatiles, sweetness, saltiness and acidity present in the fruit. There are 578 volatile compounds reported from mango fruit in various cultivars<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b32">32</xref>. The presence of large number of varieties of mango that differ in aroma makes mango an interesting system for the study of aroma. About 54 contigs related to flavour showed significant differential regulation during ripening of “Dashehari” mango. The LOX pathway genes are also involved in the aroma development. Five contigs belonging to lipoxygenase pathway were indentified in the “Dashehari” transcriptome (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">Figs 4</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7">7a</xref> (c28867, c28033, c27996 and c15630) were down-regulated in mid ripe stage while transcript levels of c26529 increased in mid ripe stage. On the contrary 4 Lox genes in the “Kent” variety<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b5">5</xref> were significantly up-regulated in ripe fruit. Mango fruit vastly differ in aroma volatiles. The changes in the transcript profiles of genes of LOX pathway between Kent and “Dashehari” again indicates the involvement of different aroma pathways in different varieties. 14 contigs related to terpenoid pathway were also identified (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7">Fig. 7b</xref>). The farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase (FPPS) and geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate synthase (GGPS) were shown to be involved in the aroma volatiles of “Kent” variety; however, in the present study the FPPS and GGPS genes were not significantly up-regulated indicating lesser role of these genes in the flavour development of “Dashehari” mango. From the carotenoid pathway out of 11 contigs, 7 contigs were significantly up-regulated and 4 were down-regulated in mid ripe stage (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7">Fig. 7c</xref>). Contig related to phytoene synthase (PSY, c27119) was up-regulated in midripe fruit of “Dashehari”. In “Kent” contig related to PSY was highly expressed but did not change during ripening. Three contigs related to 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase were also present in “Dashehari” transcriptome. Contigs c53134 and c1330 were 2 to 3 fold down regulated whereas c27658 was four fold up-regulated (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">Supplementary Table S3</xref>). Chalcone synthase was not identified in “Dashehari”, however, it was present in “Zill” mango. We found 20 contigs fitting into the flavonoid pathway out of which 10 were upregulated and 10 were down-regulated (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7">Fig. 7d</xref>). Amongst the up-regulated ones c13317, c27457, c17148 and c18130 showed significant changes while c38441 and c20847 were significantly down-regulated in midripe stage.</p><p>Mango is an excellent source of β-carotene and α-tocopherols (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.ars.usda.gov/nutrientdata">www.ars.usda.gov/nutrientdata</ext-link>). The precursor substrate for both these phytonutrients is p-hydroxyphenylpyruvate (p-HPP). HPP is converted to homogentisate (HGA) by the enzyme p-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase (HPPD). HGA is then utilized through two different pathways to form tocopherols and carotenes<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b33">33</xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b34">34</xref>. In a previous study, Singh <italic>et al.</italic> reported characterization of HPPD gene from mango. <italic>MiHPPD</italic> expression was ripening-related and correlated with an increase in tocopherol and carotenoid content in mango fruit<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b11">11</xref>. The expression was triggered with the initiation of ripening. Therefore, contigs showing sequence similarity to <italic>MiHPPD</italic> were searched in the transcriptome data. Two contigs (c27898_g1_i2 and c27898_g1_i3) showed similarity with <italic>MiHPPD</italic> (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">Suppplementary Table S4</xref>). Contigs c27898_g1_i3 and c27898_g1_i2 had 95–98% identity with <italic>MiHPPD</italic> sequence. In transcriptome data these did not show significant change between unripe and mid-ripe stages. It is possible that the transcript level of <italic>MiHPPD</italic> level increased post mid-ripe stage and did not show much change during early ripening.</p><p>Mono- and/or sesquiterpene hydrocarbons are the predominant constituents of Indian mango cultivars. However, levels of other volatiles like alcohols, aldehydes, esters, furanones and lactones also play role in imparting specific aroma are also responsible for the distinct flavour and taste of different mango cultivars<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b35">35</xref>. Alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) genes are expressed in a developmentally regulated manner particularly during fruit ripening and have been shown to play a major role in flavour development in ripe tomato, melon<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b36">36</xref>. In Dashehari transcriptome data 8 contigs related to ADH were identified. Three showed similarities to the already identified <italic>MiADH</italic>s from mango<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b10">10</xref>. These <italic>MiADH</italic>s shared high homology at nucleotide and amino acid level in the coding region. These contigs were down-regulated in midripe stage (<2 fold change, not significant). Singh <italic>et al.</italic> also reported that all three <italic>MiADH</italic>s were highly up-regulated on day one post harvest and then the transcript abundance decreased further during progression of ripening<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b10">10</xref>. The promoter regions of these genes were divergent suggesting that the three ADH genes might be under regulation of different cues though present in ripening fruit<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b10">10</xref>. Besides these, additional four ADHs present in the transcriptome did not show significant changes in their expression level.</p></sec><sec disp-level="2"><title>Real time validation of differentially expressed genes</title><p>In order to validate transcriptomic data (although sequencing was carried out with three biological replicates) some representative genes from various pathways were selected for real time PCR validation. The expression pattern during the progression of fruit ripening was analysed in three stages of ripening (unripe, mid ripe and ripe). The genes analysed were picked from ethylene biosynthetic pathway [SAM synthase (c27773), ACC synthase (c18584), ACC oxidase (c22984)], ethylene signalling pathway [ethylene receptor; ETR (c29681), EIN3 isoforms, (c23448_g1_i1 and c23448_g2_i1) and cell wall modifying protiens [endo beta 1–4 glucanase (c27942), expansin (c25255), pectate lyase (c27147) and polygalacturonase (c26690). All the genes showed similar trends of transcript pattern in unripe and mid ripe stage as obtained from the transcriptome data. Interestingly all these genes were highly up-regulated in ripe stage (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f8">Fig. 8</xref>).</p></sec></sec><sec disp-level="1"><title>Conclusion</title><p>The comparative transcriptome of “Dashehari” pulp gives global landscape of differentially expressed genes in an Indian variety. The expression data obtained by RNA-seq was validated with the data obtained by qRT-PCR and also with studies carried out earlier on softening related genes. The number of genes and expression patterns of some of the genes was different from “Kent” variety and, therefore, suggests varietal differences in ripening and aroma. These transcriptome studies could be extended to other varieties to develop variety specific functional markers for each trait for ripening parameters, aroma/volatile biosynthesis enzymes and flowering time etc for use in marker assisted breeding programmes.</p></sec><sec disp-level="1"><title>Methods</title><sec disp-level="2"><title>Plant material</title><p>Mango fruit of “Dashehari” variety were harvested at the mature green stage from the orchard located near Malihabad region in Lucknow India. After harvesting, unripe and mid ripe stages of fruit were used for illumina sequencing while unripe, mid ripe and ripe stages were used for 454 pyro-sequencing. The stages were defined based on fruit firmness<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b7">7</xref>. Mangoes of different stages were photographed and cut samples were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −70 °C for further use. Fruit firmness was measured using a Penetrometer (Fruit Pressure Tester model FT 011).</p></sec><sec disp-level="2"><title>RNA preparation</title><p>Total RNA was extracted from mango pulp from inner zones (roughly 1 cm from the stone) of unripe, mid-ripe and ripe stages (D0I, D3I, D6I) according to the protocol of Asif <italic>et al.</italic><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b37">37</xref>. In order to remove the contaminating genomic DNA, the RNA preparation was treated with RNase free DNase I (RFD). Qualitative and quantitative estimation of the RNA was performed using Nano-Drop ND-1000 UV-Vis spectrophotometer and by 1.2% agarose gel electrophoresis.</p></sec><sec disp-level="2"><title>Transcriptome sequencing from ripe and unripe tissue</title><p>ds-cDNA was prepared using random primers with the help of SuperScript Double-Stranded cDNA Synthesis kit (Invitrogen), as per the protocol supplied with the kit. This ds cDNA was checked both quantitatively and qualitatively on Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer DNA chip (Agilent Technologies Inc., Santa Clara, CA). The fragments smaller than 300 bp were removed using AMPure purification kit (Beckman Coulter; Agencourt, USA). The purified samples were again checked on DNA chip (Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer, USA). RL Adapters were ligated to the fragments and these ligated products were purified as per the guidelines provided by Roche, USA. These adapter ligated fragments were then used for the clonal amplification by emulsion PCR for sequencing (following the instructions given by the manufacturers). The sequencing of libraries prepared using samples of unripe, midripe and ripe stages (postharvest) was carried out on 454-GS-FLX sequencing platform according to the instructions provided with GS FLX Titanium Kit. The 454 pyrosequenced reads of all the libraries were assembled with ROCHE GS-Assembler (version 2.5.3) with 40 base pair overlap and 96% identity for different libraries forming contigs and singletons. This data was in SFF file format.</p><p>RFD treated RNA from inner zones from unripe and mid ripe stages (D0I and D3I) of “Dashehari” was sent for the Illumina sequencing along with the SFF files obtained from 454 pyrosequencing platform. Paired-end <italic>De-novo</italic> transcriptome assembly was performed using Illumina HiSeq (Quality score >Q20, SciGenome, India). For this the total RNA integrity was checked using an Agilent Technologies 2100 Bioanalyzer (RIN values 8 or more were considered), followed by purification and fragmentation of mRNA using magnetic beads having poly T oligos. The next step was the synthesis of first strand and second strand cDNA synthesis respectively. Double stranded cDNA (ds cDNA) was separated and overhangs were converted into blunt ends using end repair mix (supplied with the kit). To these Adenylation was done (attachment of single A) followed by ligation of multiple indexing adapters in order to prepare them for hybridization on the flow cell. Quality control of the library was carried out using Real Time PCR and Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer followed by sequencing using Illumina HiSeq2000 (San Diago, CA, USA).</p></sec><sec disp-level="2"><title><italic>De-novo</italic> assembly of transcriptome and annotation</title><p>Using sff_extract tool SFF files (452845 reads) were extracted and then tag sequences were removed from 454 data using tag cleaner. Further quality trimming was done followed by hybrid assembly. Using Bowtie program the trimmed reads were aligned to get the assembled transcriptome. Up to 1-mismatch was allowed in the seed region (length = 31 bp). The assembled transcript was annotated using CANoPI (Contig Annotator Pipeline) for <italic>de novo</italic> transcriptome assembly. This pipeline performs annotation to the NCBI NR database, GO annotation and pathway annotation. Differential gene expression analysis was performed using DESeq program in R-Bioc. p value was adjusted with the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure [which controls false discovery rate (FDR)]<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b38">38</xref>. The transcripts with p-value < 0.05, FDR <0.05 and Fold change <underline><</underline>−2 or <underline>></underline>2 were selected. All the annotated TAIR10 ids were used to extract the KO ids from the KAAS database (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.genome.jp/tools/kaas/">http://www.genome.jp/tools/kaas/</ext-link>). These Ko ids were submitted in Kegg (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.genome.jp/kegg/">http://www.genome.jp/kegg/</ext-link>) to extract all the Metabolic pathways<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b39">39</xref>. Also, the Uniprot ids were input in KOBAS 2.0 to retrieve the significant pathways. Heat Map was generated using the FPKM values from MeV 4.2.1.</p></sec><sec disp-level="2"><title>Pathway and GO enrichment analysis</title><p>All the GO terms were extracted from the up and down regulated genes. The GO enrichment was performed by TopGO analysis in R package and the classic fisher test analysis was used for the statistics<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b40">40</xref>. The pathway enrichment was carried out using the Aracyc database. The statistical test was fisher exact test for p-value and Benjamini Hochberg for FDR correction.</p></sec><sec disp-level="2"><title>Comparison with NCBI database</title><p>The assembled transcripts were compared with NCBI non-redundant protein database using Blastx program. Transcripts showing matches with E-value ≤ 10<sup>−50</sup> and similarity score ≥40% were retained for further annotation. Close to 90% of the assembled transcripts found using Blastx have similarity of more than 60% at protein level with the existing proteins at NCBI database. The predicted proteins from Blastx were annotated against NCBI, UniProt.</p></sec><sec disp-level="2"><title>Comparison of “Dashehari” and “Kent data”</title><p>Total transcripts obtained in our study were compared with the assembled data of Kent variety of 1D and 10 D using blastn programme. The threshold e-value was set at e<sup>−10</sup> and 70% aligned length.</p></sec><sec disp-level="2"><title>Validation of differentially expressed genes by real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis</title><p>Expression of randomly selected differentially expressed cell-wall hydrolases, ethylene biosynthesis and signaling components were investigated using Real-Time PCR Detection System (ABI 7500, Applied Biosystems, USA) and fast SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (VeriQuest SYBR Green qPCR Master Mix, Affymetrix) to validate 454-Illumina hybrid assembly data. cDNA samples were prepared from RFD (RNase free DNase) treated RNA with the help of RevertAid H minus M-MuLV Reverse transcriptase. Each PCR reaction was set up in total 20 μl volume containing 2X Fast SYBR green master mix, cDNA and gene-specific primers (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">Supplementary Table S5</xref>). MiActin was used as the reference gene. The PCR cycling conditions were as follows: 50 °C for 20 sec, 95 °C for 10 min for holding and 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 sec and 60 <underline>°</underline>C for 1 min. The Real-time data was analysed using the ΔΔCT method<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b41">41</xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b42">42</xref>. All the experiments were carried out using three biological replicates along with technical replicates and the statistical analysis (standard deviation) was also performed for the data.</p></sec></sec><sec disp-level="1"><title>Additional Information</title><p><bold>How to cite this article</bold>: Srivastava, S. <italic>et al.</italic> Comparative transcriptome analysis of unripe and mid-ripe fruit of <italic>Mangifera indica (var</italic>. “Dashehari”) unravels ripening associated genes. <italic>Sci. Rep.</italic><bold>6</bold>, 32557; doi: 10.1038/srep32557 (2016).</p></sec><sec sec-type="supplementary-material" id="S1"><title>Supplementary Material</title><supplementary-material id="d33e27" content-type="local-data"><caption><title>Supplementary Information</title></caption><media xlink:href="srep32557-s1.pdf"></media></supplementary-material></sec></body><back><ack><p>We are thankful to CSIR, India for financial support to S.S. and G.P. This research was funded from net work project BSC107.</p></ack><ref-list><ref id="b1"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Singh</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Singh</surname><given-names>R. K.</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Sane</surname><given-names>V. A.</given-names></name> & <name><surname>Nath</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><article-title>Mango-Postharvest Biology and Biotechnology</article-title>. <source>Critical Review in Plant Sciences</source><volume>32</volume>, <fpage>217</fpage>–<lpage>236</lpage> (<year>2013</year>).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="b2"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Reddy</surname><given-names>Y. T. N.</given-names></name> & <name><surname>Srivastava</surname><given-names>G. C.</given-names></name><article-title>Ethylene biosynthesis and respiration in mango fruits during ripening</article-title>. <source>Indian Journal of Plant Physiology</source><volume>4</volume>, <fpage>32</fpage>–<lpage>35</lpage> (<year>1999</year>).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="b3"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Viruel</surname><given-names>M. A.</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Escribano</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Barbieri</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Ferri</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name> & <name><surname>Hormaza</surname><given-names>J. I.</given-names></name><article-title>Fingerprinting, embryo type and geographic differentiation in mango (Mangifera indica L., Anacardiaceae) with microsatellites</article-title>. <source>Molecular Breeding</source><volume>15</volume>, <fpage>383</fpage>–<lpage>393</lpage> (<year>2005</year>).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="b4"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>H. X.</given-names></name><italic>et al.</italic><article-title>Transcriptome and proteomic analysis of mango (Mangifera indica Linn) fruits</article-title>. <source>Journal of proteomics</source><volume>105</volume>, <fpage>19</fpage>–<lpage>30</lpage> (<year>2014</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24704857</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="b5"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Dautt-Castro</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><italic>et al.</italic><article-title>Mango (Mangifera indica L.) cv. Kent fruit mesocarp de novo transcriptome assembly identifies gene families important for ripening</article-title>. <source>Frontiers in plant science</source><volume>6</volume>, <fpage>62</fpage> (<year>2015</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25741352</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="b6"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Azim</surname><given-names>M. K.</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Khan</surname><given-names>I. A.</given-names></name> & <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><article-title>Characterization of mango (<italic>Mangifera indica</italic> L.) transcriptome and chloroplast genome</article-title>. <source>Plant molecular biology</source><volume>85</volume>, <fpage>193</fpage>–<lpage>208</lpage> (<year>2014</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24515595</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="b7"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Sane</surname><given-names>V. A.</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Chourasia</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name> & <name><surname>Nath</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><article-title>Softening in mango (<italic>Mangifera indica</italic> cv. Dashehari) is correlated with the expression of an early ethylene responsive, ripening related expansin gene, MiExpA1</article-title>. <source>Postharvest biology and technology</source><volume>38</volume>, <fpage>223</fpage>–<lpage>230</lpage> (<year>2005</year>).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="b8"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Chourasia</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Sane</surname><given-names>V. A.</given-names></name> & <name><surname>Nath</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><article-title>Differential expression of pectate lyase during ethylene-induced postharvest softening of mango (<italic>Mangifera indica</italic> var. Dashehari)</article-title>. <source>Physiologia Plantarum</source><volume>128</volume>, <fpage>546</fpage>–<lpage>555</lpage> (<year>2006</year>).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="b9"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Chourasia</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Sane</surname><given-names>V. A.</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Singh</surname><given-names>R. K.</given-names></name> & <name><surname>Nath</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><article-title>Isolation and characterization of the MiCel1 gene from mango: ripening related expression and enhanced endoglucanase activity during softening</article-title>. <source>Plant growth regulation</source><volume>56</volume>, <fpage>117</fpage>–<lpage>127</lpage> (<year>2008</year>).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="b10"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Singh</surname><given-names>R. K.</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Sane</surname><given-names>V. A.</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Misra</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Ali</surname><given-names>S. A.</given-names></name> & <name><surname>Nath</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><article-title>Differential expression of the mango alcohol dehydrogenase gene family during ripening</article-title>. <source>Phytochemistry</source><volume>71</volume>, <fpage>1485</fpage>–<lpage>1494</lpage> (<year>2010</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20598721</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="b11"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Singh</surname><given-names>R. K.</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Ali</surname><given-names>S. A.</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Nath</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name> & <name><surname>Sane</surname><given-names>V. A.</given-names></name><article-title>Activation of ethylene-responsive p-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase leads to increased tocopherol levels during ripening in mango</article-title>. <source>Journal of Experimental Botany</source><volume>62</volume>, <fpage>3375</fpage>–<lpage>3385</lpage> (<year>2011</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21430290</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="b12"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Ravanel</surname><given-names>S. P.</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Gakière</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Job</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name> & <name><surname>Douce</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><article-title>The specific features of methionine biosynthesis and metabolism in plants</article-title>. <source>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences</source><volume>95</volume>, <fpage>7805</fpage>–<lpage>7812</lpage> (<year>1998</year>).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="b13"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>S. F.</given-names></name> & <name><surname>Hoffman</surname><given-names>N. E.</given-names></name><article-title>Ethylene biosynthesis and its regulation in higher plants</article-title>. <source>Annual review of plant physiology</source><volume>35</volume>, <fpage>155</fpage>–<lpage>189</lpage> (<year>1984</year>).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="b14"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Kende</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><article-title>Ethylene biosynthesis</article-title>. <source>Annual review of plant biology</source><volume>44</volume>, <fpage>283</fpage>–<lpage>307</lpage> (<year>1993</year>).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="b15"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Lin</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Zhong</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name> & <name><surname>Grierson</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><article-title>Recent advances in ethylene research</article-title>. <source>Journal of Experimental Botany</source><volume>60</volume>(12), <fpage>3311</fpage>–<lpage>3336</lpage> (<year>2009</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19567479</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="b16"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Nakatsuka</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><italic>et al.</italic><article-title>Differential expression and internal feedback regulation of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate synthase, 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate oxidase, and ethylene receptor genes in tomato fruit during development and ripening</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiology</source><volume>118</volume>, <fpage>1295</fpage>–<lpage>1305</lpage> (<year>1998</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9847103</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="b17"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Barry</surname><given-names>C. S.</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Llop-Tous</surname><given-names>M. I.</given-names></name> & <name><surname>Grierson</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><article-title>The regulation of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid synthase gene expression during the transition from system-1 to system-2 ethylene synthesis in tomato</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiology</source><volume>123</volume>, <fpage>979</fpage>–<lpage>986</lpage> (<year>2000</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10889246</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="b18"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Tan</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name> & <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><article-title>Exploring the apple genome reveals six ACC synthase genes expressed during fruit ripening</article-title>. <source>Scientia Horticulturae</source><volume>157</volume>, <fpage>119</fpage>–<lpage>123</lpage> (<year>2013</year>).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="b19"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Nakano</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Suzuki</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Fujimura</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name> & <name><surname>Shinshi</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><article-title>Genome-wide analysis of the ERF gene family in Arabidopsis and rice</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiology</source><volume>140</volume>, <fpage>411</fpage>–<lpage>432</lpage> (<year>2006</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16407444</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="b20"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Zhong</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Lin</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name> & <name><surname>Grierson</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><article-title>Tomato ethylene receptor–CTR interactions: visualization of NEVER-RIPE interactions with multiple CTRs at the endoplasmic reticulum</article-title>. <source>Journal of Experimental Botany</source><volume>59</volume>(4), <fpage>965</fpage>–<lpage>972</lpage> (<year>2008</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18349053</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="b21"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Binnie</surname><given-names>J. E.</given-names></name> & <name><surname>McManus</surname><given-names>M. T.</given-names></name><article-title>Characterization of the 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) oxidase multigene family of <italic>Malus domestica</italic> Borkh</article-title>. <source>Phytochemistry</source><volume>70</volume>, <fpage>348</fpage>–<lpage>360</lpage> (<year>2009</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19223050</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="b22"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Inaba</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><italic>et al.</italic><article-title>Differential feedback regulation of ethylene biosynthesis in pulp and peel tissues of banana fruit</article-title>. <source>Journal of Experimental Botany</source><volume>58</volume>, <fpage>1047</fpage>–<lpage>1057</lpage> (<year>2007</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17185740</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="b23"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Trivellini</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Ferrante</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Vernieri</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name> & <name><surname>Serra</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><article-title>Effects of abscisic acid on ethylene biosynthesis and perception in Hibiscus rosa-sinensis L. flower development</article-title>. <source>Journal of Experimental Botany</source><volume>62</volume>, <fpage>5437</fpage>–<lpage>5452</lpage> (<year>2011</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21841180</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="b24"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Winterhagen</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Hagemann</surname><given-names>M. H.</given-names></name> & <name><surname>Wünsche</surname><given-names>J. N.</given-names></name><article-title>Expression and interaction of the mango ethylene receptor MiETR1 and different receptor versions of MiERS1</article-title>. <source>Plant Science</source><volume>246</volume>, <fpage>26</fpage>–<lpage>36</lpage> (<year>2016</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26993233</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="b25"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Roberts</surname><given-names>M. R.</given-names></name><article-title>Regulatory 14-3-3 protein–protein interactions in plant cells</article-title>. <source>Current opinion in plant biology</source><volume>3</volume>, <fpage>400</fpage>–<lpage>405</lpage> (<year>2000</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11019808</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="b26"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Yao</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Du</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Jiang</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name> & <name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>J. Y.</given-names></name><article-title>Interaction between ACC synthase 1 and 14-3-3 proteins in rice: a new insight</article-title>. <source>Biochemistry (Moscow)</source><volume>72</volume>, <fpage>1003</fpage>–<lpage>1007</lpage> (<year>2007</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17922660</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="b27"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Chang</surname><given-names>I. F.</given-names></name><italic>et al.</italic><article-title>Proteomic profiling of tandem affinity purified 14-3-3 protein complexes in <italic>Arabidopsis thaliana</italic></article-title>. <source>Proteomics</source><volume>9</volume>, <fpage>2967</fpage>–<lpage>2985</lpage> (<year>2009</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19452453</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="b28"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>M. Y.</given-names></name><italic>et al.</italic><article-title>Identification and expression analysis of four 14-3-3 genes during fruit ripening in banana (<italic>Musa acuminata</italic> L. AAA group, cv. Brazilian)</article-title>. <source>Plant cell reports</source><volume>31</volume>, <fpage>369</fpage>–<lpage>378</lpage> (<year>2012</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22009053</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="b29"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Brummell</surname><given-names>D. A.</given-names></name> & <name><surname>Harpster</surname><given-names>M. H.</given-names></name><article-title>Cell wall metabolism in fruit softening and quality and its manipulation in transgenic plants</article-title>. <source>Plant Mol. Biol.</source><volume>47</volume>, <fpage>311</fpage>–<lpage>340</lpage> (<year>2001</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11554479</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="b30"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Asha</surname><given-names>Sane, V. A.</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Sane</surname><given-names>A. P.</given-names></name> & <name><surname>Nath</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><article-title>Multiple forms of expansin genes are expressed during banana fruit ripening and development</article-title>. <source>Postharvest Biology and Technology</source>. <volume>45</volume>, <fpage>184</fpage>–<lpage>192</lpage> (<year>2007</year>).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="b31"><mixed-citation publication-type="other"><name><surname>Chaurasia</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name> Biochemical and molecular studies of softening related genes in mango (<italic>Mangifera indica</italic>) var. Dashehari. Ph.D thesis. Submitted to Department of Botany, University of Lucknow (2010).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="b32"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Singh</surname><given-names>R. K.</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Srivastava</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name> & <name><surname>Sane</surname><given-names>V. A.</given-names></name><article-title>Biology and biotechnology of fruit flavor and aroma volatiles</article-title>. <source>Stewart Postharvest Review</source><volume>9</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>–<lpage>13</lpage> (<year>2013</year>).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="b33"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Prescott</surname><given-names>A. G.</given-names></name> & <name><surname>John</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><article-title>Dioxygenases: molecular structure and role in plant metabolism</article-title>. <source>Annual review of plant biology</source><volume>47</volume>, <fpage>245</fpage>–<lpage>271</lpage> (<year>1996</year>).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="b34"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Norris</surname><given-names>S. R.</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Shen</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name> & <name><surname>Della Penna</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><article-title>Complementation of the Arabidopsis pds1 mutation with the gene encoding p-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiology</source><volume>117</volume>, <fpage>1317</fpage>–<lpage>1323</lpage> (<year>1998</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9701587</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="b35"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Pandit</surname><given-names>S. S.</given-names></name><italic>et al.</italic><article-title>Cultivar relationships in mango based on fruit volatile profiles</article-title>. <source>Food Chemistry</source><volume>114</volume>, <fpage>363</fpage>–<lpage>372</lpage> (<year>2009</year>).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="b36"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Echeverria</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Graell</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Lopez</surname><given-names>M. L.</given-names></name> & <name><surname>Lara</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name><article-title>Volatile production, quality, and aroma-related enzyme activities during maturation of “Fuji” apples</article-title>. <source>Postharvest Biology and Technology</source><volume>31</volume>, <fpage>217</fpage>–<lpage>227</lpage> (<year>2004</year>).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="b37"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Asif</surname><given-names>M. H.</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Dhawan</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name> & <name><surname>Nath</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><article-title>A simple procedure for the isolation of high quality RNA from ripening banana fruit</article-title>. <source>Plant Molecular Biology Reporter</source><volume>18</volume>, <fpage>109</fpage>–<lpage>115</lpage> (<year>2000</year>).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="b38"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Benjamini</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name> & <name><surname>Hochberg</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><article-title>Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing</article-title>. <source>Journal of the Royal Statistical Society</source><volume>57</volume>, <fpage>289</fpage>–<lpage>300</lpage> (<year>1995</year>).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="b39"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Moriya</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Itoh</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Okuda</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Yoshizawa</surname><given-names>A. C.</given-names></name> & <name><surname>Kanehisa</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><article-title>KAAS: an automatic genome annotation and pathway reconstruction server</article-title>. <source>Nucleic Acids Research</source><volume>35</volume>, <fpage>182</fpage>–<lpage>185</lpage> (<year>2007</year>).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="b40"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Zhou</surname><given-names>Du</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Xin</surname><given-names>Zhou</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Yi</surname><given-names>Ling</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Zhenhai</surname><given-names>Zhang</given-names></name> & <name><surname>Zhen</surname><given-names>Su</given-names></name><article-title>agriGO: a GO analysis toolkit for the agricultural community Nucleic Acids Research Advance Access</article-title>. <source>Nucleic Acids Research</source><volume>38</volume>, <fpage>W64</fpage>–<lpage>W70</lpage> (<year>2010</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20435677</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="b41"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Livak</surname><given-names>K. J.</given-names></name> & <name><surname>Schmittgen</surname><given-names>T. D.</given-names></name><article-title>Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2<sup>−∆∆CT</sup> method</article-title>. <source>Methods</source><volume>25</volume>, <fpage>402</fpage>–<lpage>408</lpage> (<year>2001</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11846609</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="b42"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Jozefczuk</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name> & <name><surname>Adjaye</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><article-title>Quantitative real-time PCR-based analysis of gene expression</article-title>. <source>Methods Enzymology</source>. <volume>500</volume>, <fpage>99</fpage>–<lpage>109</lpage> (<year>2011</year>).</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn><p><bold>Author Contributions</bold> V.A.S. and A.P.S. conceived and designed the experiments; S.S., R.K.S. and G.P. performed the experiments and data analysis; M.H.A., R.G., S.S. and V.A.S. carried out bioinformatic analysis; S.S. and V.A.S. wrote the manuscript.</p></fn></fn-group></back><floats-group><fig id="f1"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p>(<bold>a</bold>) Pictorial representation of ripening stages of “Dashehari” mango fruit where progression of ripening from stone to peel is shown. (<bold>b</bold>) Firmness of mango fruit (<italic>var</italic>. “Dashehari”) during different stages of fruit ripening, measured using penetrometer. All the measurements were done in triplicates and data is represented as mean + SE.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="srep32557-f1"></graphic></fig><fig id="f2"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><title>General features of “Dashehari” transcriptome.</title><p>(<bold>a</bold>) Length distribution of <italic>M. indica</italic> transcripts from the combined assembly. (<bold>b</bold>) GC content distribution. (<bold>c</bold>) Fold change and mean plot between unripe inner zone and midripe inner zone samples using DESeq program. The transcripts with p-value < 0.01 are shown in red. (<bold>d</bold>) Blastx similarity score distribution of “Dashehari” transcriptome with NR database.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="srep32557-f2"></graphic></fig><fig id="f3"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><title>Blastx top 15 hit with different organisms: Mango transcriptome exhibits maximum similarity with <italic>Citrus sinensis</italic> along with <italic>Citrus clementina</italic>.</title></caption><graphic xlink:href="srep32557-f3"></graphic></fig><fig id="f4"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><title>Top 25 terms in biological process category from GO annotation: the bars on x axis represent the number of transcripts for the biological processes mentioned on the y axis.</title></caption><graphic xlink:href="srep32557-f4"></graphic></fig><fig id="f5"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><title>Digital expression profiles of contigs belonging to ethylene signaling pathway from two different stages of “Dashehari” fruit ripening.</title><p>(<bold>a</bold>) SAM synthatases, (<bold>b</bold>) 1, aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate synthases (ACS), (<bold>c</bold>) 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate oxidases (ACO), (<bold>d</bold>) Ethylene receptors, (<bold>e</bold>) EIN3 isoforms. Illumina sequencing was performed in triplicates, data is represented as mean with +SE. P = 0.01 for all data sets except for EIN3 for which P = 0.5. *On bars shows significant difference at P = 0.01.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="srep32557-f5"></graphic></fig><fig id="f6"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><title>Digital expression profiles of contigs belonging to Cell wall modifying proteins from two different stages of “Dashehari” fruit ripening.</title><p>(<bold>a</bold>) Expansins, (<bold>b</bold>) Pectate Lyases (PL), (<bold>c</bold>) Polygalacturonases (PG), (<bold>d</bold>). Pectinmethyl esterases (PME), (<bold>e</bold>) Endo-beta-glucanases. Illumina sequencing was performed in triplicates, data is represented as mean with +SE. P = 0.01 for all data sets. *On bars shows significant difference at P = 0.01.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="srep32557-f6"></graphic></fig><fig id="f7"><label>Figure 7</label><caption><title>Digital expression profiles of contigs belonging to different aromatic pathways from two different stages of “Dashehari” fruit ripening.</title><p>(<bold>a</bold>) Lipoxygenases (<bold>b</bold>) Terpenes (<bold>c</bold>) Carotenoids, (<bold>d</bold>) Flavonoids. Illumina sequencing was performed in triplicates, data is represented as mean with +SE. P = 0.01 for all data sets. *On bars shows significant difference at P = 0.01.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="srep32557-f7"></graphic></fig><fig id="f8"><label>Figure 8</label><caption><title>Real time validation of genes selected from various pathways: Quantitative Real time PCR of representative contigs from different gene families was carried out using total RNA isolated from inner zones of unripe, mid ripe and ripe fruit pulp tissue of “Dashehari” mango.</title><p>Experiment was performed in triplicates and data is represented as +SE.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="srep32557-f8"></graphic></fig><table-wrap position="float" id="t1"><label>Table 1</label><caption><title>Summary of reads generated and mapping on the mango transcriptome.</title></caption><table frame="hsides" rules="groups" border="1"><colgroup><col align="left"></col><col align="center"></col><col align="center"></col><col align="center"></col><col align="center"></col><col align="center"></col><col align="center"></col></colgroup><thead valign="bottom"><tr><th align="left" valign="top" charoff="50"> </th><th align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">Raw reads 454 (GC%)</th><th align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">Trimmed reads 454 (GC%)</th><th align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">Raw reads illimina (GC%)</th><th align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">Trimmed reads illimina (GC%)</th><th align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">No of paired end reads aligned</th><th align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">No of transcripts with FPKM ≥1</th></tr></thead><tbody valign="top"><tr><td align="left" valign="top" charoff="50">Un ripe inner zone</td><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">114,754 (49)</td><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">114,591 (49)</td><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">10051330 (45.74)</td><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">10020735 (45)</td><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">3227103 (64.46%)</td><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">38010</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" charoff="50">Mid ripe inner zone</td><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">140,078 (51)</td><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">139,782 (52)</td><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">14288168 (45.18)</td><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">13133966 (44.33)</td><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">4281603 (63.90%)</td><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">36302</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap position="float" id="t2"><label>Table 2</label><caption><title>A comparative representation of different mango transcriptomes carried out so far along with “Dashehari” transcriptome.</title></caption><table frame="hsides" rules="groups" border="1"><colgroup><col align="left"></col><col align="center"></col><col align="center"></col><col align="center"></col><col align="center"></col></colgroup><thead valign="bottom"><tr><th align="left" valign="top" charoff="50">Mango variety taken</th><th align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">Tissue used for sequencing</th><th align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">Total transcripts obtained</th><th align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">Average size of transcripts</th><th align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">Number of unigenes obtained</th></tr></thead><tbody valign="top"><tr><td align="left" valign="top" charoff="50"><italic>Langra</italic></td><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">leaf</td><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">85651</td><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">536</td><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">30509</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" charoff="50"><italic>Zill</italic></td><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">Pericarp and peel</td><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">124002</td><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">838</td><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">54207</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" charoff="50"><italic>Kent</italic></td><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">mesocarp</td><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">80969</td><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">836</td><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">52948</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" charoff="50"><italic>Dashehari</italic></td><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">Inner zone of mesocarp</td><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">71733</td><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">942</td><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">44472</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap position="float" id="t3"><label>Table 3</label><caption><title>Functional annotation of <italic>M. indica var</italic>.</title></caption><table frame="hsides" rules="groups" border="1"><colgroup><col align="left"></col><col align="center"></col><col align="left"></col><col align="center"></col></colgroup><thead valign="bottom"><tr><th colspan="4" align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">Down- regulated<hr></hr></th></tr><tr><th align="left" valign="top" charoff="50"> </th><th align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">Term</th><th align="left" valign="top" charoff="50">Annotated</th><th align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">P-value</th></tr></thead><tbody valign="top"><tr><td rowspan="9" align="left" valign="middle" charoff="50">Biological Processes</td><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">GO:0010200</td><td align="left" valign="top" charoff="50">response to chitin</td><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">4.40E-10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">GO:0009753</td><td align="left" valign="top" charoff="50">Response to jasmonic acid</td><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">1.10E-09</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">GO:0009651</td><td align="left" valign="top" charoff="50">Response to salt stress</td><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">6.60E-08</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">GO:0009414</td><td align="left" valign="top" charoff="50">Response to water deprivation</td><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">1.10E-08</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">GO:009611</td><td align="left" valign="top" charoff="50">Response to wounding</td><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">2.70E-08</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">GO:0046686</td><td align="left" valign="top" charoff="50">Response to cadmium ion</td><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">4.30E-08</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">GO:0042742</td><td align="left" valign="top" charoff="50">Defense response to bacterium</td><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">2.00E-07</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">GO:0080167</td><td align="left" valign="top" charoff="50">Response to karrikin</td><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">8.30E-07</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">GO:0006857</td><td align="left" valign="top" charoff="50">Oligopetide transport</td><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">1.80E-06</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="10" align="left" valign="middle" charoff="50">Molecular functions</td><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">GO:0009409</td><td align="left" valign="top" charoff="50">Response to cold</td><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">4.10E-06</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">GO:0016168</td><td align="left" valign="top" charoff="50">Chlorophyll binding</td><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">8.70E-07</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">GO:0004590</td><td align="left" valign="top" charoff="50">Orotidine-5′-phosphate decarboxylate activity</td><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">1.40E-05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">GO:0043295</td><td align="left" valign="top" charoff="50">Glutathione binding</td><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">2.60E-05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">GO:0020037</td><td align="left" valign="top" charoff="50">Heme binding</td><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">5.80E-05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">GO:0005507</td><td align="left" valign="top" charoff="50">Copper ion binding</td><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">0.00013</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">GO:0004096</td><td align="left" valign="top" charoff="50">Catalase activity</td><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">0.00032</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">GO:0030599</td><td align="left" valign="top" charoff="50">Pectinesteraseactivity</td><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">0.00035</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">GO:0015035</td><td align="left" valign="top" charoff="50">Protein disulphide oxidoreductase activity</td><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">0.00052</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">GO:0008810</td><td align="left" valign="top" charoff="50">Cellulase activity</td><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">0.00068</td></tr><tr><td colspan="4" align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">Up-regulated</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="11" align="left" valign="middle" charoff="50">Biological Processes</td><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">Term</td><td align="left" valign="top" charoff="50">Annotated</td><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">P-value</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">GO:0045490</td><td align="left" valign="top" charoff="50">Pectin catabolic process</td><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">5.00E-09</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">GO:0006885</td><td align="left" valign="top" charoff="50">Regulation of pH</td><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">2.40E-06</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">GO:0009664</td><td align="left" valign="top" charoff="50">Plant type cell wall organization</td><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">2.70E-06</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">GO:0006754</td><td align="left" valign="top" charoff="50">ATP biosynthetic process</td><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">6.70E-06</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">GO:0055085</td><td align="left" valign="top" charoff="50">Transmembrane transport</td><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">7.90E-06</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">GO:0006562</td><td align="left" valign="top" charoff="50">Proline catabolic process</td><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">0.00031</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">GO:0006788</td><td align="left" valign="top" charoff="50">Heme oxidation</td><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">0.00031</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">GO:0009415</td><td align="left" valign="top" charoff="50">Response to water</td><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">0.00031</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">GO:0006557</td><td align="left" valign="top" charoff="50">S-adenosylmethioninamine biosynthesis</td><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">0.0006</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">GO:0006470</td><td align="left" valign="top" charoff="50">Protein dephosphorylation</td><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">0.00069</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="10" align="left" valign="middle" charoff="50">Molecular functions</td><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">GO:0030570</td><td align="left" valign="top" charoff="50">Pectate lyase activity</td><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">1.60E-11</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">GO:0022891</td><td align="left" valign="top" charoff="50">Substrate specific transmembrane transport activity</td><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">2.50E-06</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">GO:0015385</td><td align="left" valign="top" charoff="50">Sodium:proton antiporter activity</td><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">2.30E-05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">GO:0003700</td><td align="left" valign="top" charoff="50">Sequence specific DNA binding transcription factor</td><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">3.70E-05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">GO:0034450</td><td align="left" valign="top" charoff="50">Ubiquitin-ubiquitin ligase activity</td><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">4.80E-05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">GO:0004176</td><td align="left" valign="top" charoff="50">ATP-dependent peptidase activity</td><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">5.20E-05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">GO:0004722</td><td align="left" valign="top" charoff="50">Protein serine/threonine phosphatase activity</td><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">6.00E-05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">GO:0005215</td><td align="left" valign="top" charoff="50">Transporter activity</td><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">7.00E-05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">GO:0004315</td><td align="left" valign="top" charoff="50">3-oxoacyl-[acyl-carrier-protein] synthase activity</td><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">1.00E-04</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">GO:0004657</td><td align="left" valign="top" charoff="50">Proline dehydrogenase activity</td><td align="center" valign="top" charoff="50">1.00E-04</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><fn id="t3-fn1"><p>“Dashehari” <italic>transcripts: Up and down regulated GOSlim terms in M. indica</italic> transcripts under biological process (BP) and molecular function categories (MF).</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap></floats-group></pmc></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Bois/explor/OrangerV1/Data/Pmc/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000477 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000477 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Bois
|area= OrangerV1
|flux= Pmc
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= PMC:5009307
|texte= Comparative transcriptome analysis of unripe and mid-ripe fruit of Mangifera indica (var. “Dashehari”) unravels ripening associated genes
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:27586495" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a OrangerV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.25. |  |