Assessing farmers' interest in agroforestry in two contrasting agro-ecological zones of Rwanda
Identifieur interne : 000938 ( PascalFrancis/Curation ); précédent : 000937; suivant : 000939Assessing farmers' interest in agroforestry in two contrasting agro-ecological zones of Rwanda
Auteurs : C. Bucagu [Rwanda] ; B. Vanlauwe [Kenya] ; M. T. Van Wijk [Pays-Bas, Kenya] ; K. E. Giller [Pays-Bas]Source :
- Agroforestry systems [ 0167-4366 ] ; 2013.
Descripteurs français
- Pascal (Inist)
- Wicri :
- geographic : Rwanda.
- topic : Agroforesterie, Arbre.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
Uptake and management of agroforestry technologies differs among farms in Rwanda and needs to be documented as a basis for shaping future research and development programs. The objective of this study was to investigate current agroforestry practices, farmers' preferences, tree management and perspectives for agroforestry technologies. The study consisted of a combination of a formal survey, a participatory tree testing, farmer evaluation and focus group discussions in the Central Plateau (moderate altitude) and the Buberuka (high altitude) agroecological zones. A survey and a tree testing exercise with a range of species: (timber species-Eucalyptus urophyla, Grevillea robusta; legume shrubs - Calliandra calothyrsus, Tephrosia vogelii; and fruit species-Persea americana and Citrus sinensis) were carried out in Simbi (Central Plateau) and Kageyo (Buberuka) with farmers from different wealth status who received tree seedlings for planting, managing, and evaluating. Simbi had more tree species farm-1 (4.5) than Kageyo (2.9). Fruit trees occurred most frequently in Simbi. Grevillea robusta, Calliandra calothyrsus and Tephrosia vogelii were mostly established along contours, fruit trees in homefields and Eucalyptus urophyla trees in woodlots. Survival was better on contours for Grevillea robusta (58-100 %) and Calliandra calothyrsus (50-72 %). Tree growth was strongly correlated with the total tree lop biomass in Eucalyptus urophyla (R2 = 0.69). Grevillea robusta was most preferred in Simbi and Eucalyptus urophyla and Calliandra calothyrsus in Kageyo. The study provided information useful for revising the national agroforestry research and extension agenda and has important implications for other countries in the highlands of Africa.
| pA |
|
|---|
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream PascalFrancis, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000062
Links to Exploration step
Pascal:13-0094203Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Assessing farmers' interest in agroforestry in two contrasting agro-ecological zones of Rwanda</title><author><name sortKey="Bucagu, C" sort="Bucagu, C" uniqKey="Bucagu C" first="C." last="Bucagu">C. Bucagu</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Crop Science, National University of Rwanda, P.O. Box 117</s1><s2>Butare</s2><s3>RWA</s3><sZ>1 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14><country>Rwanda</country></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Vanlauwe, B" sort="Vanlauwe, B" uniqKey="Vanlauwe B" first="B." last="Vanlauwe">B. Vanlauwe</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="03"><s1>International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA)</s1><s2>Nairobi</s2><s3>KEN</s3><sZ>2 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14><country>Kenya</country></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Van Wijk, M T" sort="Van Wijk, M T" uniqKey="Van Wijk M" first="M. T." last="Van Wijk">M. T. Van Wijk</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Plant Production Systems, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 430</s1><s2>6700 AK Wageningen</s2><s3>NLD</s3><sZ>3 aut.</sZ><sZ>4 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14><country>Pays-Bas</country></affiliation><affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="04"><s1>International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI)</s1><s2>Nairobi</s2><s3>KEN</s3><sZ>3 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14><country>Kenya</country></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Giller, K E" sort="Giller, K E" uniqKey="Giller K" first="K. E." last="Giller">K. E. Giller</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Plant Production Systems, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 430</s1><s2>6700 AK Wageningen</s2><s3>NLD</s3><sZ>3 aut.</sZ><sZ>4 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14><country>Pays-Bas</country></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno><idno type="inist">13-0094203</idno><date when="2013">2013</date><idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 13-0094203 INIST</idno><idno type="RBID">Pascal:13-0094203</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000062</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Curation">000938</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Assessing farmers' interest in agroforestry in two contrasting agro-ecological zones of Rwanda</title><author><name sortKey="Bucagu, C" sort="Bucagu, C" uniqKey="Bucagu C" first="C." last="Bucagu">C. Bucagu</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Crop Science, National University of Rwanda, P.O. Box 117</s1><s2>Butare</s2><s3>RWA</s3><sZ>1 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14><country>Rwanda</country></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Vanlauwe, B" sort="Vanlauwe, B" uniqKey="Vanlauwe B" first="B." last="Vanlauwe">B. Vanlauwe</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="03"><s1>International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA)</s1><s2>Nairobi</s2><s3>KEN</s3><sZ>2 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14><country>Kenya</country></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Van Wijk, M T" sort="Van Wijk, M T" uniqKey="Van Wijk M" first="M. T." last="Van Wijk">M. T. Van Wijk</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Plant Production Systems, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 430</s1><s2>6700 AK Wageningen</s2><s3>NLD</s3><sZ>3 aut.</sZ><sZ>4 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14><country>Pays-Bas</country></affiliation><affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="04"><s1>International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI)</s1><s2>Nairobi</s2><s3>KEN</s3><sZ>3 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14><country>Kenya</country></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Giller, K E" sort="Giller, K E" uniqKey="Giller K" first="K. E." last="Giller">K. E. Giller</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Plant Production Systems, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 430</s1><s2>6700 AK Wageningen</s2><s3>NLD</s3><sZ>3 aut.</sZ><sZ>4 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14><country>Pays-Bas</country></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j" type="main">Agroforestry systems</title><title level="j" type="abbreviated">Agrofor. syst.</title><idno type="ISSN">0167-4366</idno><imprint><date when="2013">2013</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Agroforestry systems</title><title level="j" type="abbreviated">Agrofor. syst.</title><idno type="ISSN">0167-4366</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Agroecology</term><term>Agroforestry</term><term>Biophysics</term><term>Farmer</term><term>Rwanda</term><term>Social group</term><term>Tree</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Agriculteur</term><term>Agroforesterie</term><term>Agroécologie</term><term>Biophysique</term><term>Groupe social</term><term>Arbre</term><term>Rwanda</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Wicri" type="geographic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Rwanda</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Agroforesterie</term><term>Arbre</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Uptake and management of agroforestry technologies differs among farms in Rwanda and needs to be documented as a basis for shaping future research and development programs. The objective of this study was to investigate current agroforestry practices, farmers' preferences, tree management and perspectives for agroforestry technologies. The study consisted of a combination of a formal survey, a participatory tree testing, farmer evaluation and focus group discussions in the Central Plateau (moderate altitude) and the Buberuka (high altitude) agroecological zones. A survey and a tree testing exercise with a range of species: (timber species-Eucalyptus urophyla, Grevillea robusta; legume shrubs - Calliandra calothyrsus, Tephrosia vogelii; and fruit species-Persea americana and Citrus sinensis) were carried out in Simbi (Central Plateau) and Kageyo (Buberuka) with farmers from different wealth status who received tree seedlings for planting, managing, and evaluating. Simbi had more tree species farm<sup>-1</sup> (4.5) than Kageyo (2.9). Fruit trees occurred most frequently in Simbi. Grevillea robusta, Calliandra calothyrsus and Tephrosia vogelii were mostly established along contours, fruit trees in homefields and Eucalyptus urophyla trees in woodlots. Survival was better on contours for Grevillea robusta (58-100 %) and Calliandra calothyrsus (50-72 %). Tree growth was strongly correlated with the total tree lop biomass in Eucalyptus urophyla (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.69). Grevillea robusta was most preferred in Simbi and Eucalyptus urophyla and Calliandra calothyrsus in Kageyo. The study provided information useful for revising the national agroforestry research and extension agenda and has important implications for other countries in the highlands of Africa.</div></front></TEI><inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0167-4366</s0></fA01><fA02 i1="01"><s0>AGSYE6</s0></fA02><fA03 i2="1"><s0>Agrofor. syst.</s0></fA03><fA05><s2>87</s2></fA05><fA06><s2>1</s2></fA06><fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Assessing farmers' interest in agroforestry in two contrasting agro-ecological zones of Rwanda</s1></fA08><fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>BUCAGU (C.)</s1></fA11><fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>VANLAUWE (B.)</s1></fA11><fA11 i1="03" i2="1"><s1>VAN WIJK (M. T.)</s1></fA11><fA11 i1="04" i2="1"><s1>GILLER (K. E.)</s1></fA11><fA14 i1="01"><s1>Plant Production Systems, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 430</s1><s2>6700 AK Wageningen</s2><s3>NLD</s3><sZ>3 aut.</sZ><sZ>4 aut.</sZ></fA14><fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Crop Science, National University of Rwanda, P.O. Box 117</s1><s2>Butare</s2><s3>RWA</s3><sZ>1 aut.</sZ></fA14><fA14 i1="03"><s1>International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA)</s1><s2>Nairobi</s2><s3>KEN</s3><sZ>2 aut.</sZ></fA14><fA14 i1="04"><s1>International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI)</s1><s2>Nairobi</s2><s3>KEN</s3><sZ>3 aut.</sZ></fA14><fA20><s1>141-158</s1></fA20><fA21><s1>2013</s1></fA21><fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0></fA23><fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1><s2>19350</s2><s5>354000506285780120</s5></fA43><fA44><s0>0000</s0><s1>© 2013 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1></fA44><fA45><s0>1 p.1/4</s0></fA45><fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>13-0094203</s0></fA47><fA60><s1>P</s1></fA60><fA61><s0>A</s0></fA61><fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Agroforestry systems</s0></fA64><fA66 i1="01"><s0>NLD</s0></fA66><fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>Uptake and management of agroforestry technologies differs among farms in Rwanda and needs to be documented as a basis for shaping future research and development programs. The objective of this study was to investigate current agroforestry practices, farmers' preferences, tree management and perspectives for agroforestry technologies. The study consisted of a combination of a formal survey, a participatory tree testing, farmer evaluation and focus group discussions in the Central Plateau (moderate altitude) and the Buberuka (high altitude) agroecological zones. A survey and a tree testing exercise with a range of species: (timber species-Eucalyptus urophyla, Grevillea robusta; legume shrubs - Calliandra calothyrsus, Tephrosia vogelii; and fruit species-Persea americana and Citrus sinensis) were carried out in Simbi (Central Plateau) and Kageyo (Buberuka) with farmers from different wealth status who received tree seedlings for planting, managing, and evaluating. Simbi had more tree species farm<sup>-1</sup> (4.5) than Kageyo (2.9). Fruit trees occurred most frequently in Simbi. Grevillea robusta, Calliandra calothyrsus and Tephrosia vogelii were mostly established along contours, fruit trees in homefields and Eucalyptus urophyla trees in woodlots. Survival was better on contours for Grevillea robusta (58-100 %) and Calliandra calothyrsus (50-72 %). Tree growth was strongly correlated with the total tree lop biomass in Eucalyptus urophyla (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.69). Grevillea robusta was most preferred in Simbi and Eucalyptus urophyla and Calliandra calothyrsus in Kageyo. The study provided information useful for revising the national agroforestry research and extension agenda and has important implications for other countries in the highlands of Africa.</s0></fC01><fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002A32</s0></fC02><fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Agriculteur</s0><s5>01</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Farmer</s0><s5>01</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Agricultor</s0><s5>01</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Agroforesterie</s0><s5>02</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Agroforestry</s0><s5>02</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Agroforestal</s0><s5>02</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Agroécologie</s0><s5>03</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Agroecology</s0><s5>03</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Agroecología</s0><s5>03</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Biophysique</s0><s5>04</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Biophysics</s0><s5>04</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Biofísica</s0><s5>04</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Groupe social</s0><s5>05</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Social group</s0><s5>05</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Grupo social</s0><s5>05</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Arbre</s0><s5>10</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Tree</s0><s5>10</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Arbol</s0><s5>10</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Rwanda</s0><s2>NG</s2><s5>20</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Rwanda</s0><s2>NG</s2><s5>20</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Ruanda</s0><s2>NG</s2><s5>20</s5></fC03><fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Ecologie</s0></fC07><fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Ecology</s0></fC07><fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Ecología</s0></fC07><fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Afrique</s0><s2>NG</s2></fC07><fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Africa</s0><s2>NG</s2></fC07><fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Africa</s0><s2>NG</s2></fC07><fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Zone tropicale</s0><s5>33</s5></fC07><fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Tropical zone</s0><s5>33</s5></fC07><fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Zona tropical</s0><s5>33</s5></fC07><fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Afrique subsaharienne</s0><s2>NG</s2><s5>34</s5></fC07><fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Sub-Saharan Africa</s0><s2>NG</s2><s5>34</s5></fC07><fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Africa subsahariana</s0><s2>NG</s2><s5>34</s5></fC07><fC07 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Afrique Centrale</s0><s2>NG</s2><s5>59</s5></fC07><fC07 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Central Africa</s0><s2>NG</s2><s5>59</s5></fC07><fC07 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Africa central</s0><s2>NG</s2><s5>59</s5></fC07><fC07 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Zone équatoriale</s0><s5>60</s5></fC07><fC07 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Equatorial zone</s0><s5>60</s5></fC07><fC07 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Zona ecuatorial</s0><s5>60</s5></fC07><fN21><s1>063</s1></fN21><fN44 i1="01"><s1>OTO</s1></fN44><fN82><s1>OTO</s1></fN82></pA></standard></inist></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Bois/explor/OrangerV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000938 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 000938 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Bois
|area= OrangerV1
|flux= PascalFrancis
|étape= Curation
|type= RBID
|clé= Pascal:13-0094203
|texte= Assessing farmers' interest in agroforestry in two contrasting agro-ecological zones of Rwanda
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.25. |  |