Natural field spread of decline and nondecline inducing isolates of citrus tristeza virus in florida after the introduction of the brown citrus aphid
Identifieur interne : 000622 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000621; suivant : 000623Natural field spread of decline and nondecline inducing isolates of citrus tristeza virus in florida after the introduction of the brown citrus aphid
Auteurs : C. A. Powell ; R. R. Pelosi ; M. S. Burton ; P. A. Rundell ; M. A. Ritenour ; R. C. BullockSource :
- HortScience [ 0018-5345 ] ; 2005.
Descripteurs français
- Pascal (Inist)
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
The effectiveness of seven different aphid control regimes in delaying movement of decline (DI) and nondecline (NDI) inducing isolates of citrus tristeza virus (CTV) into a CTV-free sweet orange scion on sour orange rootstock block was monitored annually for 5 years beginning in 1999, 2 years after the introduction of the brown citrus aphid (BrCA) into the region. After 5 years, the mean percentages of infection with DI CTV were 19, 19, 17, 29, 23, 19, or 14 for trees treated annually with imidocloprid, every 6 months with imidocloprid, every 3 months with imidocloprid, every 2 months with imidocloprid, annually with Temik, annually with Meta Systox-R, or untreated, respectively. The mean percentages of infection (after 5 years) with only NDI isolates of CTV for the seven treatments were 40, 31, 33, 38, 38, 38, or 33. There was no significant difference (after 5 years) among either the DI or NDI CTV treatment means. The overall 5-year infection percentage for DI CTV (20%) was somewhat lower than that reported before the introduction of the BrCA (27%) (11). Aphid densities (Toxoptera citricidus and Aphis spiraecola) varied considerably from year to year. Good aphid control was achieved with all four imidocloprid treatments, but not with Temik or Meta Systox-R. The level of aphid control did not influence overall CTV infection percentages.
Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)
Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.
pA |
|
---|
Format Inist (serveur)
NO : | PASCAL 05-0249359 INIST |
---|---|
ET : | Natural field spread of decline and nondecline inducing isolates of citrus tristeza virus in florida after the introduction of the brown citrus aphid |
AU : | POWELL (C. A.); PELOSI (R. R.); BURTON (M. S.); RUNDELL (P. A.); RITENOUR (M. A.); BULLOCK (R. C.) |
AF : | University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Indian River Research and Education Center, 2199 South Rock Road/Fort Pierce, FL 34945-3138/Etats-Unis (1 aut., 2 aut., 3 aut., 4 aut., 5 aut., 6 aut.) |
DT : | Publication en série; Niveau analytique |
SO : | HortScience; ISSN 0018-5345; Coden HJHSAR; Etats-Unis; Da. 2005; Vol. 40; No. 3; Pp. 691-693; Bibl. 17 ref. |
LA : | Anglais |
EA : | The effectiveness of seven different aphid control regimes in delaying movement of decline (DI) and nondecline (NDI) inducing isolates of citrus tristeza virus (CTV) into a CTV-free sweet orange scion on sour orange rootstock block was monitored annually for 5 years beginning in 1999, 2 years after the introduction of the brown citrus aphid (BrCA) into the region. After 5 years, the mean percentages of infection with DI CTV were 19, 19, 17, 29, 23, 19, or 14 for trees treated annually with imidocloprid, every 6 months with imidocloprid, every 3 months with imidocloprid, every 2 months with imidocloprid, annually with Temik, annually with Meta Systox-R, or untreated, respectively. The mean percentages of infection (after 5 years) with only NDI isolates of CTV for the seven treatments were 40, 31, 33, 38, 38, 38, or 33. There was no significant difference (after 5 years) among either the DI or NDI CTV treatment means. The overall 5-year infection percentage for DI CTV (20%) was somewhat lower than that reported before the introduction of the BrCA (27%) (11). Aphid densities (Toxoptera citricidus and Aphis spiraecola) varied considerably from year to year. Good aphid control was achieved with all four imidocloprid treatments, but not with Temik or Meta Systox-R. The level of aphid control did not influence overall CTV infection percentages. |
CC : | 002A32 |
FD : | Isolat; Horticulture; Virus tristeza agrume; Citrus sinensis; Aphididae; Floride |
FG : | Closterovirus; Closteroviridae; Virus; Rutaceae; Dicotyledones; Angiospermae; Spermatophyta; Aphidoidea; Homoptera; Insecta; Arthropoda; Invertebrata; Etats Unis; Amérique du Nord; Amérique; Phytopathogène; Virus à ARN; Agrume; ETATS DU SUD EST (EU); ETATS DU SUD (EU) |
ED : | Isolate; Horticulture; Citrus tristeza virus; Citrus sinensis; Aphididae; Florida |
EG : | Closterovirus; Closteroviridae; Virus; Rutaceae; Dicotyledones; Angiospermae; Spermatophyta; Aphidoidea; Homoptera; Insecta; Arthropoda; Invertebrata; United States; North America; America; Plant pathogen; RNA virus; Citrus fruit |
SD : | Aislado; Horticultura; Citrus tristeza virus; Citrus sinensis; Aphididae; Florida |
LO : | INIST-13300.354000129843250410 |
ID : | 05-0249359 |
Links to Exploration step
Pascal:05-0249359Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Natural field spread of decline and nondecline inducing isolates of citrus tristeza virus in florida after the introduction of the brown citrus aphid</title>
<author><name sortKey="Powell, C A" sort="Powell, C A" uniqKey="Powell C" first="C. A." last="Powell">C. A. Powell</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Indian River Research and Education Center, 2199 South Rock Road</s1>
<s2>Fort Pierce, FL 34945-3138</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Pelosi, R R" sort="Pelosi, R R" uniqKey="Pelosi R" first="R. R." last="Pelosi">R. R. Pelosi</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Indian River Research and Education Center, 2199 South Rock Road</s1>
<s2>Fort Pierce, FL 34945-3138</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Burton, M S" sort="Burton, M S" uniqKey="Burton M" first="M. S." last="Burton">M. S. Burton</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Indian River Research and Education Center, 2199 South Rock Road</s1>
<s2>Fort Pierce, FL 34945-3138</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Rundell, P A" sort="Rundell, P A" uniqKey="Rundell P" first="P. A." last="Rundell">P. A. Rundell</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Indian River Research and Education Center, 2199 South Rock Road</s1>
<s2>Fort Pierce, FL 34945-3138</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Ritenour, M A" sort="Ritenour, M A" uniqKey="Ritenour M" first="M. A." last="Ritenour">M. A. Ritenour</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Indian River Research and Education Center, 2199 South Rock Road</s1>
<s2>Fort Pierce, FL 34945-3138</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Bullock, R C" sort="Bullock, R C" uniqKey="Bullock R" first="R. C." last="Bullock">R. C. Bullock</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Indian River Research and Education Center, 2199 South Rock Road</s1>
<s2>Fort Pierce, FL 34945-3138</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">05-0249359</idno>
<date when="2005">2005</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 05-0249359 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:05-0249359</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000622</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Natural field spread of decline and nondecline inducing isolates of citrus tristeza virus in florida after the introduction of the brown citrus aphid</title>
<author><name sortKey="Powell, C A" sort="Powell, C A" uniqKey="Powell C" first="C. A." last="Powell">C. A. Powell</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Indian River Research and Education Center, 2199 South Rock Road</s1>
<s2>Fort Pierce, FL 34945-3138</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Pelosi, R R" sort="Pelosi, R R" uniqKey="Pelosi R" first="R. R." last="Pelosi">R. R. Pelosi</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Indian River Research and Education Center, 2199 South Rock Road</s1>
<s2>Fort Pierce, FL 34945-3138</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Burton, M S" sort="Burton, M S" uniqKey="Burton M" first="M. S." last="Burton">M. S. Burton</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Indian River Research and Education Center, 2199 South Rock Road</s1>
<s2>Fort Pierce, FL 34945-3138</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Rundell, P A" sort="Rundell, P A" uniqKey="Rundell P" first="P. A." last="Rundell">P. A. Rundell</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Indian River Research and Education Center, 2199 South Rock Road</s1>
<s2>Fort Pierce, FL 34945-3138</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Ritenour, M A" sort="Ritenour, M A" uniqKey="Ritenour M" first="M. A." last="Ritenour">M. A. Ritenour</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Indian River Research and Education Center, 2199 South Rock Road</s1>
<s2>Fort Pierce, FL 34945-3138</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Bullock, R C" sort="Bullock, R C" uniqKey="Bullock R" first="R. C." last="Bullock">R. C. Bullock</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Indian River Research and Education Center, 2199 South Rock Road</s1>
<s2>Fort Pierce, FL 34945-3138</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">HortScience</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">HortScience</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0018-5345</idno>
<imprint><date when="2005">2005</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">HortScience</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">HortScience</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0018-5345</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Aphididae</term>
<term>Citrus sinensis</term>
<term>Citrus tristeza virus</term>
<term>Florida</term>
<term>Horticulture</term>
<term>Isolate</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Isolat</term>
<term>Horticulture</term>
<term>Virus tristeza agrume</term>
<term>Citrus sinensis</term>
<term>Aphididae</term>
<term>Floride</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The effectiveness of seven different aphid control regimes in delaying movement of decline (DI) and nondecline (NDI) inducing isolates of citrus tristeza virus (CTV) into a CTV-free sweet orange scion on sour orange rootstock block was monitored annually for 5 years beginning in 1999, 2 years after the introduction of the brown citrus aphid (BrCA) into the region. After 5 years, the mean percentages of infection with DI CTV were 19, 19, 17, 29, 23, 19, or 14 for trees treated annually with imidocloprid, every 6 months with imidocloprid, every 3 months with imidocloprid, every 2 months with imidocloprid, annually with Temik, annually with Meta Systox-R, or untreated, respectively. The mean percentages of infection (after 5 years) with only NDI isolates of CTV for the seven treatments were 40, 31, 33, 38, 38, 38, or 33. There was no significant difference (after 5 years) among either the DI or NDI CTV treatment means. The overall 5-year infection percentage for DI CTV (20%) was somewhat lower than that reported before the introduction of the BrCA (27%) (11). Aphid densities (Toxoptera citricidus and Aphis spiraecola) varied considerably from year to year. Good aphid control was achieved with all four imidocloprid treatments, but not with Temik or Meta Systox-R. The level of aphid control did not influence overall CTV infection percentages.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0018-5345</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01"><s0>HJHSAR</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>HortScience</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>40</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>3</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Natural field spread of decline and nondecline inducing isolates of citrus tristeza virus in florida after the introduction of the brown citrus aphid</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>POWELL (C. A.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>PELOSI (R. R.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1"><s1>BURTON (M. S.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="04" i2="1"><s1>RUNDELL (P. A.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="05" i2="1"><s1>RITENOUR (M. A.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="06" i2="1"><s1>BULLOCK (R. C.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Indian River Research and Education Center, 2199 South Rock Road</s1>
<s2>Fort Pierce, FL 34945-3138</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>691-693</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>2005</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>13300</s2>
<s5>354000129843250410</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2005 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>17 ref.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>05-0249359</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>HortScience</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>USA</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>The effectiveness of seven different aphid control regimes in delaying movement of decline (DI) and nondecline (NDI) inducing isolates of citrus tristeza virus (CTV) into a CTV-free sweet orange scion on sour orange rootstock block was monitored annually for 5 years beginning in 1999, 2 years after the introduction of the brown citrus aphid (BrCA) into the region. After 5 years, the mean percentages of infection with DI CTV were 19, 19, 17, 29, 23, 19, or 14 for trees treated annually with imidocloprid, every 6 months with imidocloprid, every 3 months with imidocloprid, every 2 months with imidocloprid, annually with Temik, annually with Meta Systox-R, or untreated, respectively. The mean percentages of infection (after 5 years) with only NDI isolates of CTV for the seven treatments were 40, 31, 33, 38, 38, 38, or 33. There was no significant difference (after 5 years) among either the DI or NDI CTV treatment means. The overall 5-year infection percentage for DI CTV (20%) was somewhat lower than that reported before the introduction of the BrCA (27%) (11). Aphid densities (Toxoptera citricidus and Aphis spiraecola) varied considerably from year to year. Good aphid control was achieved with all four imidocloprid treatments, but not with Temik or Meta Systox-R. The level of aphid control did not influence overall CTV infection percentages.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002A32</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Isolat</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Isolate</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Aislado</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Horticulture</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Horticulture</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Horticultura</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Virus tristeza agrume</s0>
<s2>NW</s2>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Citrus tristeza virus</s0>
<s2>NW</s2>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Citrus tristeza virus</s0>
<s2>NW</s2>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Citrus sinensis</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Citrus sinensis</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Citrus sinensis</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Aphididae</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Aphididae</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Aphididae</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Floride</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Florida</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Florida</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Closterovirus</s0>
<s2>NW</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Closterovirus</s0>
<s2>NW</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Closterovirus</s0>
<s2>NW</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Closteroviridae</s0>
<s2>NW</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Closteroviridae</s0>
<s2>NW</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Closteroviridae</s0>
<s2>NW</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Virus</s0>
<s2>NW</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Virus</s0>
<s2>NW</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Virus</s0>
<s2>NW</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Rutaceae</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Rutaceae</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Rutaceae</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Dicotyledones</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Dicotyledones</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Dicotyledones</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Angiospermae</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Angiospermae</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Angiospermae</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Spermatophyta</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Spermatophyta</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Spermatophyta</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Aphidoidea</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Aphidoidea</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Aphidoidea</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Homoptera</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Homoptera</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Homoptera</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="10" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Insecta</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="10" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Insecta</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="10" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Insecta</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="11" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Arthropoda</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="11" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Arthropoda</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="11" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Arthropoda</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="12" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Invertebrata</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="12" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Invertebrata</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="12" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Invertebrata</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="13" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Etats Unis</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="13" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>United States</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="13" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Estados Unidos</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="14" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Amérique du Nord</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="14" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>North America</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="14" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>America del norte</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="15" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Amérique</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="15" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>America</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="15" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>America</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="16" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Phytopathogène</s0>
<s5>31</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="16" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Plant pathogen</s0>
<s5>31</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="16" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Fitopatógeno</s0>
<s5>31</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="17" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Virus à ARN</s0>
<s5>32</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="17" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>RNA virus</s0>
<s5>32</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="17" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Virus con RNA</s0>
<s5>32</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="18" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Agrume</s0>
<s5>39</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="18" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Citrus fruit</s0>
<s5>39</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="18" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Agrios</s0>
<s5>39</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="19" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>ETATS DU SUD EST (EU)</s0>
<s4>INC</s4>
<s5>68</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="20" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>ETATS DU SUD (EU)</s0>
<s4>INC</s4>
<s5>69</s5>
</fC07>
<fN21><s1>171</s1>
</fN21>
<fN44 i1="01"><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN44>
<fN82><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN82>
</pA>
</standard>
<server><NO>PASCAL 05-0249359 INIST</NO>
<ET>Natural field spread of decline and nondecline inducing isolates of citrus tristeza virus in florida after the introduction of the brown citrus aphid</ET>
<AU>POWELL (C. A.); PELOSI (R. R.); BURTON (M. S.); RUNDELL (P. A.); RITENOUR (M. A.); BULLOCK (R. C.)</AU>
<AF>University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Indian River Research and Education Center, 2199 South Rock Road/Fort Pierce, FL 34945-3138/Etats-Unis (1 aut., 2 aut., 3 aut., 4 aut., 5 aut., 6 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>HortScience; ISSN 0018-5345; Coden HJHSAR; Etats-Unis; Da. 2005; Vol. 40; No. 3; Pp. 691-693; Bibl. 17 ref.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>The effectiveness of seven different aphid control regimes in delaying movement of decline (DI) and nondecline (NDI) inducing isolates of citrus tristeza virus (CTV) into a CTV-free sweet orange scion on sour orange rootstock block was monitored annually for 5 years beginning in 1999, 2 years after the introduction of the brown citrus aphid (BrCA) into the region. After 5 years, the mean percentages of infection with DI CTV were 19, 19, 17, 29, 23, 19, or 14 for trees treated annually with imidocloprid, every 6 months with imidocloprid, every 3 months with imidocloprid, every 2 months with imidocloprid, annually with Temik, annually with Meta Systox-R, or untreated, respectively. The mean percentages of infection (after 5 years) with only NDI isolates of CTV for the seven treatments were 40, 31, 33, 38, 38, 38, or 33. There was no significant difference (after 5 years) among either the DI or NDI CTV treatment means. The overall 5-year infection percentage for DI CTV (20%) was somewhat lower than that reported before the introduction of the BrCA (27%) (11). Aphid densities (Toxoptera citricidus and Aphis spiraecola) varied considerably from year to year. Good aphid control was achieved with all four imidocloprid treatments, but not with Temik or Meta Systox-R. The level of aphid control did not influence overall CTV infection percentages.</EA>
<CC>002A32</CC>
<FD>Isolat; Horticulture; Virus tristeza agrume; Citrus sinensis; Aphididae; Floride</FD>
<FG>Closterovirus; Closteroviridae; Virus; Rutaceae; Dicotyledones; Angiospermae; Spermatophyta; Aphidoidea; Homoptera; Insecta; Arthropoda; Invertebrata; Etats Unis; Amérique du Nord; Amérique; Phytopathogène; Virus à ARN; Agrume; ETATS DU SUD EST (EU); ETATS DU SUD (EU)</FG>
<ED>Isolate; Horticulture; Citrus tristeza virus; Citrus sinensis; Aphididae; Florida</ED>
<EG>Closterovirus; Closteroviridae; Virus; Rutaceae; Dicotyledones; Angiospermae; Spermatophyta; Aphidoidea; Homoptera; Insecta; Arthropoda; Invertebrata; United States; North America; America; Plant pathogen; RNA virus; Citrus fruit</EG>
<SD>Aislado; Horticultura; Citrus tristeza virus; Citrus sinensis; Aphididae; Florida</SD>
<LO>INIST-13300.354000129843250410</LO>
<ID>05-0249359</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Bois/explor/OrangerV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000622 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000622 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Bois |area= OrangerV1 |flux= PascalFrancis |étape= Corpus |type= RBID |clé= Pascal:05-0249359 |texte= Natural field spread of decline and nondecline inducing isolates of citrus tristeza virus in florida after the introduction of the brown citrus aphid }}
![]() | This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.25. | ![]() |