Comparison of bacteriostatic and bactericidal activity of 13 essential oils against strains with varying sensitivity to antibiotics
Identifieur interne : 000370 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000369; suivant : 000371Comparison of bacteriostatic and bactericidal activity of 13 essential oils against strains with varying sensitivity to antibiotics
Auteurs : L. Mayaud ; A. Carricajo ; A. Zhiri ; G. AubertSource :
- Letters in applied microbiology [ 0266-8254 ] ; 2008.
Descripteurs français
- Pascal (Inist)
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
Aims: To compare the bacteriostatic and bactericidal activity of 13 chemotyped essential oils (EO) on 65 bacteria with varying sensitivity to antibiotics. Methods and Results: Fifty-five bacterial strains were tested with two methods used for evaluation of antimicrobial activity (CLSI recommendations): the agar dilution method and the time-killing curve method. EO containing aldehydes (Cinnamomum verum bark and Cymbopogon citratus), phenols (Origanum compactum, Trachyspermum ammi, Thymus satureioides, Eugenia caryophyllus and Cinnamomum verum leaf) showed the highest antimicrobial activity with minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) <2% (v/v) against all strains except Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Alcohol-based EO (Melaleuca alternifolia, Cymbopogon martinii and Lavandula angustifolia) exhibited varying degrees of activity depending on Gram status. EO containing 1.8-cineole and hydrocarbons (Eucalyptus globulus, Melaleuca cajeputii and Citrus sinensis) had MIC90% ≥ 10% (v/v). Against P. aeruginosa, only C. verum bark and 0. compactum presented MIC ≤2% (v/v). Cinnamomum verum bark, 0. compactum, T. satureioides, C. verum leaf and M. alternifolia were bactericidal against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli at concentrations ranging from to 0.31% to 10% (v/v) after 1 h of contact. Cinnamomum verum bark and 0. compactum were bactericidal against P. aeruginosa within 5 min at concentrations <2% (v/v). Conclusions: Cinnamomum verum bark had the highest antimicrobial activity, particularly against resistant strains. Significance and Impact of the Study: Bacteriostatic and bactericidal activity of EO on nosocomial antibiotic-resistant strains.
Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)
Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.
| pA |
|
|---|
Format Inist (serveur)
| NO : | PASCAL 08-0444580 INIST |
|---|---|
| ET : | Comparison of bacteriostatic and bactericidal activity of 13 essential oils against strains with varying sensitivity to antibiotics |
| AU : | MAYAUD (L.); CARRICAJO (A.); ZHIRI (A.); AUBERT (G.) |
| AF : | Antibiology Laboratory, CHU Hospital Nord/Saint-Etienne/France (1 aut., 4 aut.); Bacteriology Laboratory, CHU Hospital Nord/Saint-Etienne/France (2 aut.); Pranarôm International S.A/Ghislenghien/Belgique (3 aut.) |
| DT : | Publication en série; Niveau analytique |
| SO : | Letters in applied microbiology; ISSN 0266-8254; Coden LAMIE7; Royaume-Uni; Da. 2008; Vol. 47; No. 3; Pp. 167-173; Bibl. 3/4 p. |
| LA : | Anglais |
| EA : | Aims: To compare the bacteriostatic and bactericidal activity of 13 chemotyped essential oils (EO) on 65 bacteria with varying sensitivity to antibiotics. Methods and Results: Fifty-five bacterial strains were tested with two methods used for evaluation of antimicrobial activity (CLSI recommendations): the agar dilution method and the time-killing curve method. EO containing aldehydes (Cinnamomum verum bark and Cymbopogon citratus), phenols (Origanum compactum, Trachyspermum ammi, Thymus satureioides, Eugenia caryophyllus and Cinnamomum verum leaf) showed the highest antimicrobial activity with minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) <2% (v/v) against all strains except Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Alcohol-based EO (Melaleuca alternifolia, Cymbopogon martinii and Lavandula angustifolia) exhibited varying degrees of activity depending on Gram status. EO containing 1.8-cineole and hydrocarbons (Eucalyptus globulus, Melaleuca cajeputii and Citrus sinensis) had MIC90% ≥ 10% (v/v). Against P. aeruginosa, only C. verum bark and 0. compactum presented MIC ≤2% (v/v). Cinnamomum verum bark, 0. compactum, T. satureioides, C. verum leaf and M. alternifolia were bactericidal against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli at concentrations ranging from to 0.31% to 10% (v/v) after 1 h of contact. Cinnamomum verum bark and 0. compactum were bactericidal against P. aeruginosa within 5 min at concentrations <2% (v/v). Conclusions: Cinnamomum verum bark had the highest antimicrobial activity, particularly against resistant strains. Significance and Impact of the Study: Bacteriostatic and bactericidal activity of EO on nosocomial antibiotic-resistant strains. |
| CC : | 002A05 |
| FD : | Etude comparative; Bactéricidie; Huile essentielle; Sensibilité; Antibiotique; Cinnamomum; Infection nosocomiale; Microbiologie appliquée |
| FG : | Lauraceae; Dicotyledones; Angiospermae; Spermatophyta |
| ED : | Comparative study; Bactericidal effect; Essential oil; Sensitivity; Antibiotic; Cinnamomum; Nosocomial infection; Applied microbiology |
| EG : | Lauraceae; Dicotyledones; Angiospermae; Spermatophyta |
| SD : | Estudio comparativo; Bactericidia; Aceite esencial; Sensibilidad; Antibiótico; Cinnamomum; Infección nosocomial; Microbiología aplicada |
| LO : | INIST-7415L.354000185197290050 |
| ID : | 08-0444580 |
Links to Exploration step
Pascal:08-0444580Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Comparison of bacteriostatic and bactericidal activity of 13 essential oils against strains with varying sensitivity to antibiotics</title><author><name sortKey="Mayaud, L" sort="Mayaud, L" uniqKey="Mayaud L" first="L." last="Mayaud">L. Mayaud</name><affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Antibiology Laboratory, CHU Hospital Nord</s1><s2>Saint-Etienne</s2><s3>FRA</s3><sZ>1 aut.</sZ><sZ>4 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Carricajo, A" sort="Carricajo, A" uniqKey="Carricajo A" first="A." last="Carricajo">A. Carricajo</name><affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Bacteriology Laboratory, CHU Hospital Nord</s1><s2>Saint-Etienne</s2><s3>FRA</s3><sZ>2 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Zhiri, A" sort="Zhiri, A" uniqKey="Zhiri A" first="A." last="Zhiri">A. Zhiri</name><affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="03"><s1>Pranarôm International S.A</s1><s2>Ghislenghien</s2><s3>BEL</s3><sZ>3 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Aubert, G" sort="Aubert, G" uniqKey="Aubert G" first="G." last="Aubert">G. Aubert</name><affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Antibiology Laboratory, CHU Hospital Nord</s1><s2>Saint-Etienne</s2><s3>FRA</s3><sZ>1 aut.</sZ><sZ>4 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno><idno type="inist">08-0444580</idno><date when="2008">2008</date><idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 08-0444580 INIST</idno><idno type="RBID">Pascal:08-0444580</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000370</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Comparison of bacteriostatic and bactericidal activity of 13 essential oils against strains with varying sensitivity to antibiotics</title><author><name sortKey="Mayaud, L" sort="Mayaud, L" uniqKey="Mayaud L" first="L." last="Mayaud">L. Mayaud</name><affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Antibiology Laboratory, CHU Hospital Nord</s1><s2>Saint-Etienne</s2><s3>FRA</s3><sZ>1 aut.</sZ><sZ>4 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Carricajo, A" sort="Carricajo, A" uniqKey="Carricajo A" first="A." last="Carricajo">A. Carricajo</name><affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Bacteriology Laboratory, CHU Hospital Nord</s1><s2>Saint-Etienne</s2><s3>FRA</s3><sZ>2 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Zhiri, A" sort="Zhiri, A" uniqKey="Zhiri A" first="A." last="Zhiri">A. Zhiri</name><affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="03"><s1>Pranarôm International S.A</s1><s2>Ghislenghien</s2><s3>BEL</s3><sZ>3 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Aubert, G" sort="Aubert, G" uniqKey="Aubert G" first="G." last="Aubert">G. Aubert</name><affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Antibiology Laboratory, CHU Hospital Nord</s1><s2>Saint-Etienne</s2><s3>FRA</s3><sZ>1 aut.</sZ><sZ>4 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j" type="main">Letters in applied microbiology</title><title level="j" type="abbreviated">Lett. appl. microbiol.</title><idno type="ISSN">0266-8254</idno><imprint><date when="2008">2008</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Letters in applied microbiology</title><title level="j" type="abbreviated">Lett. appl. microbiol.</title><idno type="ISSN">0266-8254</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Antibiotic</term><term>Applied microbiology</term><term>Bactericidal effect</term><term>Cinnamomum</term><term>Comparative study</term><term>Essential oil</term><term>Nosocomial infection</term><term>Sensitivity</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Etude comparative</term><term>Bactéricidie</term><term>Huile essentielle</term><term>Sensibilité</term><term>Antibiotique</term><term>Cinnamomum</term><term>Infection nosocomiale</term><term>Microbiologie appliquée</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Aims: To compare the bacteriostatic and bactericidal activity of 13 chemotyped essential oils (EO) on 65 bacteria with varying sensitivity to antibiotics. Methods and Results: Fifty-five bacterial strains were tested with two methods used for evaluation of antimicrobial activity (CLSI recommendations): the agar dilution method and the time-killing curve method. EO containing aldehydes (Cinnamomum verum bark and Cymbopogon citratus), phenols (Origanum compactum, Trachyspermum ammi, Thymus satureioides, Eugenia caryophyllus and Cinnamomum verum leaf) showed the highest antimicrobial activity with minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) <2% (v/v) against all strains except Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Alcohol-based EO (Melaleuca alternifolia, Cymbopogon martinii and Lavandula angustifolia) exhibited varying degrees of activity depending on Gram status. EO containing 1.8-cineole and hydrocarbons (Eucalyptus globulus, Melaleuca cajeputii and Citrus sinensis) had MIC<sub>90%</sub> ≥ 10% (v/v). Against P. aeruginosa, only C. verum bark and 0. compactum presented MIC ≤2% (v/v). Cinnamomum verum bark, 0. compactum, T. satureioides, C. verum leaf and M. alternifolia were bactericidal against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli at concentrations ranging from to 0.31% to 10% (v/v) after 1 h of contact. Cinnamomum verum bark and 0. compactum were bactericidal against P. aeruginosa within 5 min at concentrations <2% (v/v). Conclusions: Cinnamomum verum bark had the highest antimicrobial activity, particularly against resistant strains. Significance and Impact of the Study: Bacteriostatic and bactericidal activity of EO on nosocomial antibiotic-resistant strains.</div></front></TEI><inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0266-8254</s0></fA01><fA02 i1="01"><s0>LAMIE7</s0></fA02><fA03 i2="1"><s0>Lett. appl. microbiol.</s0></fA03><fA05><s2>47</s2></fA05><fA06><s2>3</s2></fA06><fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Comparison of bacteriostatic and bactericidal activity of 13 essential oils against strains with varying sensitivity to antibiotics</s1></fA08><fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>MAYAUD (L.)</s1></fA11><fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>CARRICAJO (A.)</s1></fA11><fA11 i1="03" i2="1"><s1>ZHIRI (A.)</s1></fA11><fA11 i1="04" i2="1"><s1>AUBERT (G.)</s1></fA11><fA14 i1="01"><s1>Antibiology Laboratory, CHU Hospital Nord</s1><s2>Saint-Etienne</s2><s3>FRA</s3><sZ>1 aut.</sZ><sZ>4 aut.</sZ></fA14><fA14 i1="02"><s1>Bacteriology Laboratory, CHU Hospital Nord</s1><s2>Saint-Etienne</s2><s3>FRA</s3><sZ>2 aut.</sZ></fA14><fA14 i1="03"><s1>Pranarôm International S.A</s1><s2>Ghislenghien</s2><s3>BEL</s3><sZ>3 aut.</sZ></fA14><fA20><s1>167-173</s1></fA20><fA21><s1>2008</s1></fA21><fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0></fA23><fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1><s2>7415L</s2><s5>354000185197290050</s5></fA43><fA44><s0>0000</s0><s1>© 2008 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1></fA44><fA45><s0>3/4 p.</s0></fA45><fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>08-0444580</s0></fA47><fA60><s1>P</s1></fA60><fA61><s0>A</s0></fA61><fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Letters in applied microbiology</s0></fA64><fA66 i1="01"><s0>GBR</s0></fA66><fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>Aims: To compare the bacteriostatic and bactericidal activity of 13 chemotyped essential oils (EO) on 65 bacteria with varying sensitivity to antibiotics. Methods and Results: Fifty-five bacterial strains were tested with two methods used for evaluation of antimicrobial activity (CLSI recommendations): the agar dilution method and the time-killing curve method. EO containing aldehydes (Cinnamomum verum bark and Cymbopogon citratus), phenols (Origanum compactum, Trachyspermum ammi, Thymus satureioides, Eugenia caryophyllus and Cinnamomum verum leaf) showed the highest antimicrobial activity with minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) <2% (v/v) against all strains except Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Alcohol-based EO (Melaleuca alternifolia, Cymbopogon martinii and Lavandula angustifolia) exhibited varying degrees of activity depending on Gram status. EO containing 1.8-cineole and hydrocarbons (Eucalyptus globulus, Melaleuca cajeputii and Citrus sinensis) had MIC<sub>90%</sub> ≥ 10% (v/v). Against P. aeruginosa, only C. verum bark and 0. compactum presented MIC ≤2% (v/v). Cinnamomum verum bark, 0. compactum, T. satureioides, C. verum leaf and M. alternifolia were bactericidal against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli at concentrations ranging from to 0.31% to 10% (v/v) after 1 h of contact. Cinnamomum verum bark and 0. compactum were bactericidal against P. aeruginosa within 5 min at concentrations <2% (v/v). Conclusions: Cinnamomum verum bark had the highest antimicrobial activity, particularly against resistant strains. Significance and Impact of the Study: Bacteriostatic and bactericidal activity of EO on nosocomial antibiotic-resistant strains.</s0></fC01><fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002A05</s0></fC02><fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Etude comparative</s0><s5>01</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Comparative study</s0><s5>01</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Estudio comparativo</s0><s5>01</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Bactéricidie</s0><s5>02</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Bactericidal effect</s0><s5>02</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Bactericidia</s0><s5>02</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Huile essentielle</s0><s5>10</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Essential oil</s0><s5>10</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Aceite esencial</s0><s5>10</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Sensibilité</s0><s5>11</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Sensitivity</s0><s5>11</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Sensibilidad</s0><s5>11</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Antibiotique</s0><s5>12</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Antibiotic</s0><s5>12</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Antibiótico</s0><s5>12</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Cinnamomum</s0><s2>NS</s2><s5>13</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Cinnamomum</s0><s2>NS</s2><s5>13</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Cinnamomum</s0><s2>NS</s2><s5>13</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Infection nosocomiale</s0><s2>NM</s2><s5>19</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Nosocomial infection</s0><s2>NM</s2><s5>19</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Infección nosocomial</s0><s2>NM</s2><s5>19</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Microbiologie appliquée</s0><s5>20</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Applied microbiology</s0><s5>20</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Microbiología aplicada</s0><s5>20</s5></fC03><fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Lauraceae</s0><s2>NS</s2></fC07><fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Lauraceae</s0><s2>NS</s2></fC07><fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Lauraceae</s0><s2>NS</s2></fC07><fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Dicotyledones</s0><s2>NS</s2></fC07><fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Dicotyledones</s0><s2>NS</s2></fC07><fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Dicotyledones</s0><s2>NS</s2></fC07><fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Angiospermae</s0><s2>NS</s2></fC07><fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Angiospermae</s0><s2>NS</s2></fC07><fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Angiospermae</s0><s2>NS</s2></fC07><fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Spermatophyta</s0><s2>NS</s2></fC07><fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Spermatophyta</s0><s2>NS</s2></fC07><fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Spermatophyta</s0><s2>NS</s2></fC07><fN21><s1>287</s1></fN21><fN44 i1="01"><s1>OTO</s1></fN44><fN82><s1>OTO</s1></fN82></pA></standard><server><NO>PASCAL 08-0444580 INIST</NO><ET>Comparison of bacteriostatic and bactericidal activity of 13 essential oils against strains with varying sensitivity to antibiotics</ET><AU>MAYAUD (L.); CARRICAJO (A.); ZHIRI (A.); AUBERT (G.)</AU><AF>Antibiology Laboratory, CHU Hospital Nord/Saint-Etienne/France (1 aut., 4 aut.); Bacteriology Laboratory, CHU Hospital Nord/Saint-Etienne/France (2 aut.); Pranarôm International S.A/Ghislenghien/Belgique (3 aut.)</AF><DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT><SO>Letters in applied microbiology; ISSN 0266-8254; Coden LAMIE7; Royaume-Uni; Da. 2008; Vol. 47; No. 3; Pp. 167-173; Bibl. 3/4 p.</SO><LA>Anglais</LA><EA>Aims: To compare the bacteriostatic and bactericidal activity of 13 chemotyped essential oils (EO) on 65 bacteria with varying sensitivity to antibiotics. Methods and Results: Fifty-five bacterial strains were tested with two methods used for evaluation of antimicrobial activity (CLSI recommendations): the agar dilution method and the time-killing curve method. EO containing aldehydes (Cinnamomum verum bark and Cymbopogon citratus), phenols (Origanum compactum, Trachyspermum ammi, Thymus satureioides, Eugenia caryophyllus and Cinnamomum verum leaf) showed the highest antimicrobial activity with minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) <2% (v/v) against all strains except Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Alcohol-based EO (Melaleuca alternifolia, Cymbopogon martinii and Lavandula angustifolia) exhibited varying degrees of activity depending on Gram status. EO containing 1.8-cineole and hydrocarbons (Eucalyptus globulus, Melaleuca cajeputii and Citrus sinensis) had MIC<sub>90%</sub> ≥ 10% (v/v). Against P. aeruginosa, only C. verum bark and 0. compactum presented MIC ≤2% (v/v). Cinnamomum verum bark, 0. compactum, T. satureioides, C. verum leaf and M. alternifolia were bactericidal against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli at concentrations ranging from to 0.31% to 10% (v/v) after 1 h of contact. Cinnamomum verum bark and 0. compactum were bactericidal against P. aeruginosa within 5 min at concentrations <2% (v/v). Conclusions: Cinnamomum verum bark had the highest antimicrobial activity, particularly against resistant strains. Significance and Impact of the Study: Bacteriostatic and bactericidal activity of EO on nosocomial antibiotic-resistant strains.</EA><CC>002A05</CC><FD>Etude comparative; Bactéricidie; Huile essentielle; Sensibilité; Antibiotique; Cinnamomum; Infection nosocomiale; Microbiologie appliquée</FD><FG>Lauraceae; Dicotyledones; Angiospermae; Spermatophyta</FG><ED>Comparative study; Bactericidal effect; Essential oil; Sensitivity; Antibiotic; Cinnamomum; Nosocomial infection; Applied microbiology</ED><EG>Lauraceae; Dicotyledones; Angiospermae; Spermatophyta</EG><SD>Estudio comparativo; Bactericidia; Aceite esencial; Sensibilidad; Antibiótico; Cinnamomum; Infección nosocomial; Microbiología aplicada</SD><LO>INIST-7415L.354000185197290050</LO><ID>08-0444580</ID></server></inist></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Bois/explor/OrangerV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000370 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000370 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Bois
|area= OrangerV1
|flux= PascalFrancis
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= Pascal:08-0444580
|texte= Comparison of bacteriostatic and bactericidal activity of 13 essential oils against strains with varying sensitivity to antibiotics
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.25. |  |