Serveur d'exploration sur l'oranger

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Response of Young and Maturing Citrus Trees Grown on a Sandy Soil to Irrigation Scheduling, Nitrogen Fertilizer Rate, and Nitrogen Application Method

Identifieur interne : 000348 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000347; suivant : 000349

Response of Young and Maturing Citrus Trees Grown on a Sandy Soil to Irrigation Scheduling, Nitrogen Fertilizer Rate, and Nitrogen Application Method

Auteurs : Kelly T. Morgan ; T. Adair Wheaton ; William S. Castle ; Laurence R. Parsons

Source :

RBID : Pascal:09-0092546

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

This study examined the effect of irrigation rates, nitrogen (N) fertilizer rates, and methods of applying N on growth and productivity of young (3 to 5 years old) and maturing (8 to 10 years old) citrus trees. A long-term study was conducted with the following objectives: 1) to measure the main effects of N rate, N application method, and irrigation on citrus tree growth and production from planting to maturity; 2) to establish growth and production relationships for long-term N rates and irrigation on well-drained sandy Entisols; and 3) to determine the effect of split fertilizer applications at two soil moisture regimes on citrus growth and production for two tree age classes as trees mature. Irrigation was applied using two selected ranges of soil moisture tensions and annual N rate varied by tree age as percentages of recommended. Methods of applying N included a dry granular fertilizer (DGF) containing soluble N applied four times annually or a controlled-release fertilizer (CRF) applied once per year and fertigation applied either four (FG04) or 30 (FG30) times annually. Canopy size and yield were higher with the moderate irrigation rate compared with the low rate for both young and maturing trees. Critical N rates for both canopy volume and yield were between 178 and 200 kg.ha-1. The CRF and FG30 treatments produced larger trees and higher yields compared with FG04 and DGF in the young tree study, indicating that younger trees benefitted from frequent split fertilizer applications. As the trees matured and filled their allocated space, the two irrigation rates were continued and N was applied at six rates using either DGF or FG30. For these 8- to 10-year-old trees, critical values of N application rates were 210 and 204 kg.ha-1 for DGF and FG30, respectively. The absence of a significant interaction between N rate and application method indicated that N uptake efficiency was similar for all application methods tested. DGF and FG30 treatments resulted in similar maturing tree yields and fruit total soluble solids. Canopy volumes, for the same trees, were significantly greater all 3 years with the FG30 treatment compared with DGF. Thus, if increase in tree size is desired, increased number of split applications will likely promote tree growth; however, little increase in fruit yield may be obtained.

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.

pA  
A01 01  1    @0 0018-5345
A02 01      @0 HJHSAR
A03   1    @0 HortScience
A05       @2 44
A06       @2 1
A08 01  1  ENG  @1 Response of Young and Maturing Citrus Trees Grown on a Sandy Soil to Irrigation Scheduling, Nitrogen Fertilizer Rate, and Nitrogen Application Method
A11 01  1    @1 MORGAN (Kelly T.)
A11 02  1    @1 ADAIR WHEATON (T.)
A11 03  1    @1 CASTLE (William S.)
A11 04  1    @1 PARSONS (Laurence R.)
A14 01      @1 Soil and Water Science Department, University of Florida, Southwest Florida REC, 2686 Sr 29 N @2 Immokalee, FL 34142 @3 USA @Z 1 aut.
A14 02      @1 Horticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida, Citrus REC, 700 Experiment Station Road @2 Lake Alfred, FL 33850 @3 USA @Z 2 aut. @Z 3 aut. @Z 4 aut.
A20       @1 145-150
A21       @1 2009
A23 01      @0 ENG
A43 01      @1 INIST @2 13300 @5 354000186415150300
A44       @0 0000 @1 © 2009 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.
A45       @0 1/4 p.
A47 01  1    @0 09-0092546
A60       @1 P
A61       @0 A
A64 01  1    @0 HortScience
A66 01      @0 USA
C01 01    ENG  @0 This study examined the effect of irrigation rates, nitrogen (N) fertilizer rates, and methods of applying N on growth and productivity of young (3 to 5 years old) and maturing (8 to 10 years old) citrus trees. A long-term study was conducted with the following objectives: 1) to measure the main effects of N rate, N application method, and irrigation on citrus tree growth and production from planting to maturity; 2) to establish growth and production relationships for long-term N rates and irrigation on well-drained sandy Entisols; and 3) to determine the effect of split fertilizer applications at two soil moisture regimes on citrus growth and production for two tree age classes as trees mature. Irrigation was applied using two selected ranges of soil moisture tensions and annual N rate varied by tree age as percentages of recommended. Methods of applying N included a dry granular fertilizer (DGF) containing soluble N applied four times annually or a controlled-release fertilizer (CRF) applied once per year and fertigation applied either four (FG04) or 30 (FG30) times annually. Canopy size and yield were higher with the moderate irrigation rate compared with the low rate for both young and maturing trees. Critical N rates for both canopy volume and yield were between 178 and 200 kg.ha-1. The CRF and FG30 treatments produced larger trees and higher yields compared with FG04 and DGF in the young tree study, indicating that younger trees benefitted from frequent split fertilizer applications. As the trees matured and filled their allocated space, the two irrigation rates were continued and N was applied at six rates using either DGF or FG30. For these 8- to 10-year-old trees, critical values of N application rates were 210 and 204 kg.ha-1 for DGF and FG30, respectively. The absence of a significant interaction between N rate and application method indicated that N uptake efficiency was similar for all application methods tested. DGF and FG30 treatments resulted in similar maturing tree yields and fruit total soluble solids. Canopy volumes, for the same trees, were significantly greater all 3 years with the FG30 treatment compared with DGF. Thus, if increase in tree size is desired, increased number of split applications will likely promote tree growth; however, little increase in fruit yield may be obtained.
C02 01  X    @0 002A32C02C1
C03 01  X  FRE  @0 Réponse @5 01
C03 01  X  ENG  @0 Response @5 01
C03 01  X  SPA  @0 Respuesta @5 01
C03 02  X  FRE  @0 Maturation @5 02
C03 02  X  ENG  @0 Ripening @5 02
C03 02  X  SPA  @0 Maduración @5 02
C03 03  X  FRE  @0 Arbre fruitier @5 03
C03 03  X  ENG  @0 Fruit tree @5 03
C03 03  X  SPA  @0 Arbol frutal @5 03
C03 04  X  FRE  @0 Irrigation fertilisante @5 04
C03 04  X  ENG  @0 Fertigation @5 04
C03 04  X  SPA  @0 Riego fertilizante @5 04
C03 05  X  FRE  @0 Fertilisation azotée @5 05
C03 05  X  ENG  @0 Nitrogen fertilization @5 05
C03 05  X  SPA  @0 Fertilización nitrogenada @5 05
C03 06  X  FRE  @0 Méthode @5 06
C03 06  X  ENG  @0 Method @5 06
C03 06  X  SPA  @0 Método @5 06
C03 07  X  FRE  @0 Nutrition @5 07
C03 07  X  ENG  @0 Nutrition @5 07
C03 07  X  SPA  @0 Nutrición @5 07
C03 08  X  FRE  @0 Engrais action lente @5 08
C03 08  X  ENG  @0 Slow releasing fertilizer @5 08
C03 08  X  SPA  @0 Abono acción lenta @5 08
C03 09  X  FRE  @0 Horticulture @5 09
C03 09  X  ENG  @0 Horticulture @5 09
C03 09  X  SPA  @0 Horticultura @5 09
C03 10  X  FRE  @0 Agrume @5 10
C03 10  X  ENG  @0 Citrus fruit @5 10
C03 10  X  SPA  @0 Agrios @5 10
C03 11  X  FRE  @0 Rutaceae @2 NS @5 11
C03 11  X  ENG  @0 Rutaceae @2 NS @5 11
C03 11  X  SPA  @0 Rutaceae @2 NS @5 11
C03 12  X  FRE  @0 Citrus sinensis @2 NS @5 12
C03 12  X  ENG  @0 Citrus sinensis @2 NS @5 12
C03 12  X  SPA  @0 Citrus sinensis @2 NS @5 12
C03 13  X  FRE  @0 Engrais azoté @5 15
C03 13  X  ENG  @0 Nitrogen fertilizer @5 15
C03 13  X  SPA  @0 Fertilizante nitrogenado @5 15
C03 14  X  FRE  @0 Floride @2 NG @5 20
C03 14  X  ENG  @0 Florida @2 NG @5 20
C03 14  X  SPA  @0 Florida @2 NG @5 20
C03 15  X  FRE  @0 Sol sableux @2 NT @5 24
C03 15  X  ENG  @0 Sandy soil @2 NT @5 24
C03 15  X  SPA  @0 Suelo arenoso @2 NT @5 24
C03 16  X  FRE  @0 Entisol @2 NT @5 25
C03 16  X  ENG  @0 Entisols @2 NT @5 25
C03 16  X  SPA  @0 Entisols @2 NT @5 25
C03 17  X  FRE  @0 Zone subtropicale @5 28
C03 17  X  ENG  @0 Subtropical zone @5 28
C03 17  X  SPA  @0 Zona subtropical @5 28
C03 18  X  FRE  @0 Texture @5 29
C03 18  X  ENG  @0 Texture @5 29
C03 18  X  SPA  @0 Textura @5 29
C03 19  X  FRE  @0 <<>> @4 INC @5 68
C03 20  X  FRE  @0 Calendrier des irrigations @4 CD @5 96
C03 20  X  ENG  @0 Irrigation scheduling @4 CD @5 96
C03 20  X  SPA  @0 Calendario de los riegos @4 CD @5 96
C03 21  X  FRE  @0 Dose d'application @4 CD @5 97
C03 21  X  ENG  @0 Application rates @4 CD @5 97
C03 21  X  SPA  @0 Dosis de aplicación @4 CD @5 97
C07 01  X  FRE  @0 Dicotyledones @2 NS
C07 01  X  ENG  @0 Dicotyledones @2 NS
C07 01  X  SPA  @0 Dicotyledones @2 NS
C07 02  X  FRE  @0 Angiospermae @2 NS
C07 02  X  ENG  @0 Angiospermae @2 NS
C07 02  X  SPA  @0 Angiospermae @2 NS
C07 03  X  FRE  @0 Spermatophyta @2 NS
C07 03  X  ENG  @0 Spermatophyta @2 NS
C07 03  X  SPA  @0 Spermatophyta @2 NS
C07 04  X  FRE  @0 Etats-Unis @2 NG
C07 04  X  ENG  @0 United States @2 NG
C07 04  X  SPA  @0 Estados Unidos @2 NG
C07 05  X  FRE  @0 Amérique du Nord @2 NG
C07 05  X  ENG  @0 North America @2 NG
C07 05  X  SPA  @0 America del norte @2 NG
C07 06  X  FRE  @0 Amérique @2 NG
C07 06  X  ENG  @0 America @2 NG
C07 06  X  SPA  @0 America @2 NG
C07 07  X  FRE  @0 Sol minéral @2 NT @5 27
C07 07  X  ENG  @0 Mineral soils @2 NT @5 27
C07 07  X  SPA  @0 Suelo mineral @2 NT @5 27
C07 08  X  FRE  @0 Plante fruitière @5 31
C07 08  X  ENG  @0 Fruit crop @5 31
C07 08  X  SPA  @0 Planta frutal @5 31
C07 09  X  FRE  @0 Propriété physique @5 33
C07 09  X  ENG  @0 Physical properties @5 33
C07 09  X  SPA  @0 Propiedad física @5 33
C07 10  X  FRE  @0 Type de sol textural @4 INC @5 69
C07 11  X  FRE  @0 Etats du Sud Est (EU) @4 INC @5 70
C07 12  X  FRE  @0 Type de sol @4 INC @5 71
C07 13  X  FRE  @0 Type de sol chimique @4 INC @5 90
C07 14  X  FRE  @0 Etats du Sud (EU) @4 INC @5 91
N21       @1 068
N44 01      @1 OTO
N82       @1 OTO

Format Inist (serveur)

NO : PASCAL 09-0092546 INIST
ET : Response of Young and Maturing Citrus Trees Grown on a Sandy Soil to Irrigation Scheduling, Nitrogen Fertilizer Rate, and Nitrogen Application Method
AU : MORGAN (Kelly T.); ADAIR WHEATON (T.); CASTLE (William S.); PARSONS (Laurence R.)
AF : Soil and Water Science Department, University of Florida, Southwest Florida REC, 2686 Sr 29 N/Immokalee, FL 34142/Etats-Unis (1 aut.); Horticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida, Citrus REC, 700 Experiment Station Road/Lake Alfred, FL 33850/Etats-Unis (2 aut., 3 aut., 4 aut.)
DT : Publication en série; Niveau analytique
SO : HortScience; ISSN 0018-5345; Coden HJHSAR; Etats-Unis; Da. 2009; Vol. 44; No. 1; Pp. 145-150; Bibl. 1/4 p.
LA : Anglais
EA : This study examined the effect of irrigation rates, nitrogen (N) fertilizer rates, and methods of applying N on growth and productivity of young (3 to 5 years old) and maturing (8 to 10 years old) citrus trees. A long-term study was conducted with the following objectives: 1) to measure the main effects of N rate, N application method, and irrigation on citrus tree growth and production from planting to maturity; 2) to establish growth and production relationships for long-term N rates and irrigation on well-drained sandy Entisols; and 3) to determine the effect of split fertilizer applications at two soil moisture regimes on citrus growth and production for two tree age classes as trees mature. Irrigation was applied using two selected ranges of soil moisture tensions and annual N rate varied by tree age as percentages of recommended. Methods of applying N included a dry granular fertilizer (DGF) containing soluble N applied four times annually or a controlled-release fertilizer (CRF) applied once per year and fertigation applied either four (FG04) or 30 (FG30) times annually. Canopy size and yield were higher with the moderate irrigation rate compared with the low rate for both young and maturing trees. Critical N rates for both canopy volume and yield were between 178 and 200 kg.ha-1. The CRF and FG30 treatments produced larger trees and higher yields compared with FG04 and DGF in the young tree study, indicating that younger trees benefitted from frequent split fertilizer applications. As the trees matured and filled their allocated space, the two irrigation rates were continued and N was applied at six rates using either DGF or FG30. For these 8- to 10-year-old trees, critical values of N application rates were 210 and 204 kg.ha-1 for DGF and FG30, respectively. The absence of a significant interaction between N rate and application method indicated that N uptake efficiency was similar for all application methods tested. DGF and FG30 treatments resulted in similar maturing tree yields and fruit total soluble solids. Canopy volumes, for the same trees, were significantly greater all 3 years with the FG30 treatment compared with DGF. Thus, if increase in tree size is desired, increased number of split applications will likely promote tree growth; however, little increase in fruit yield may be obtained.
CC : 002A32C02C1
FD : Réponse; Maturation; Arbre fruitier; Irrigation fertilisante; Fertilisation azotée; Méthode; Nutrition; Engrais action lente; Horticulture; Agrume; Rutaceae; Citrus sinensis; Engrais azoté; Floride; Sol sableux; Entisol; Zone subtropicale; Texture; <<>>; Calendrier des irrigations; Dose d'application
FG : Dicotyledones; Angiospermae; Spermatophyta; Etats-Unis; Amérique du Nord; Amérique; Sol minéral; Plante fruitière; Propriété physique; Type de sol textural; Etats du Sud Est (EU); Type de sol; Type de sol chimique; Etats du Sud (EU)
ED : Response; Ripening; Fruit tree; Fertigation; Nitrogen fertilization; Method; Nutrition; Slow releasing fertilizer; Horticulture; Citrus fruit; Rutaceae; Citrus sinensis; Nitrogen fertilizer; Florida; Sandy soil; Entisols; Subtropical zone; Texture; Irrigation scheduling; Application rates
EG : Dicotyledones; Angiospermae; Spermatophyta; United States; North America; America; Mineral soils; Fruit crop; Physical properties
SD : Respuesta; Maduración; Arbol frutal; Riego fertilizante; Fertilización nitrogenada; Método; Nutrición; Abono acción lenta; Horticultura; Agrios; Rutaceae; Citrus sinensis; Fertilizante nitrogenado; Florida; Suelo arenoso; Entisols; Zona subtropical; Textura; Calendario de los riegos; Dosis de aplicación
LO : INIST-13300.354000186415150300
ID : 09-0092546

Links to Exploration step

Pascal:09-0092546

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Response of Young and Maturing Citrus Trees Grown on a Sandy Soil to Irrigation Scheduling, Nitrogen Fertilizer Rate, and Nitrogen Application Method</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Morgan, Kelly T" sort="Morgan, Kelly T" uniqKey="Morgan K" first="Kelly T." last="Morgan">Kelly T. Morgan</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Soil and Water Science Department, University of Florida, Southwest Florida REC, 2686 Sr 29 N</s1>
<s2>Immokalee, FL 34142</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Adair Wheaton, T" sort="Adair Wheaton, T" uniqKey="Adair Wheaton T" first="T." last="Adair Wheaton">T. Adair Wheaton</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>Horticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida, Citrus REC, 700 Experiment Station Road</s1>
<s2>Lake Alfred, FL 33850</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Castle, William S" sort="Castle, William S" uniqKey="Castle W" first="William S." last="Castle">William S. Castle</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>Horticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida, Citrus REC, 700 Experiment Station Road</s1>
<s2>Lake Alfred, FL 33850</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Parsons, Laurence R" sort="Parsons, Laurence R" uniqKey="Parsons L" first="Laurence R." last="Parsons">Laurence R. Parsons</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>Horticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida, Citrus REC, 700 Experiment Station Road</s1>
<s2>Lake Alfred, FL 33850</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">09-0092546</idno>
<date when="2009">2009</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 09-0092546 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:09-0092546</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000348</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Response of Young and Maturing Citrus Trees Grown on a Sandy Soil to Irrigation Scheduling, Nitrogen Fertilizer Rate, and Nitrogen Application Method</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Morgan, Kelly T" sort="Morgan, Kelly T" uniqKey="Morgan K" first="Kelly T." last="Morgan">Kelly T. Morgan</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Soil and Water Science Department, University of Florida, Southwest Florida REC, 2686 Sr 29 N</s1>
<s2>Immokalee, FL 34142</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Adair Wheaton, T" sort="Adair Wheaton, T" uniqKey="Adair Wheaton T" first="T." last="Adair Wheaton">T. Adair Wheaton</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>Horticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida, Citrus REC, 700 Experiment Station Road</s1>
<s2>Lake Alfred, FL 33850</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Castle, William S" sort="Castle, William S" uniqKey="Castle W" first="William S." last="Castle">William S. Castle</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>Horticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida, Citrus REC, 700 Experiment Station Road</s1>
<s2>Lake Alfred, FL 33850</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Parsons, Laurence R" sort="Parsons, Laurence R" uniqKey="Parsons L" first="Laurence R." last="Parsons">Laurence R. Parsons</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>Horticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida, Citrus REC, 700 Experiment Station Road</s1>
<s2>Lake Alfred, FL 33850</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j" type="main">HortScience</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">HortScience</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0018-5345</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2009">2009</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<title level="j" type="main">HortScience</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">HortScience</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0018-5345</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Application rates</term>
<term>Citrus fruit</term>
<term>Citrus sinensis</term>
<term>Entisols</term>
<term>Fertigation</term>
<term>Florida</term>
<term>Fruit tree</term>
<term>Horticulture</term>
<term>Irrigation scheduling</term>
<term>Method</term>
<term>Nitrogen fertilization</term>
<term>Nitrogen fertilizer</term>
<term>Nutrition</term>
<term>Response</term>
<term>Ripening</term>
<term>Rutaceae</term>
<term>Sandy soil</term>
<term>Slow releasing fertilizer</term>
<term>Subtropical zone</term>
<term>Texture</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Réponse</term>
<term>Maturation</term>
<term>Arbre fruitier</term>
<term>Irrigation fertilisante</term>
<term>Fertilisation azotée</term>
<term>Méthode</term>
<term>Nutrition</term>
<term>Engrais action lente</term>
<term>Horticulture</term>
<term>Agrume</term>
<term>Rutaceae</term>
<term>Citrus sinensis</term>
<term>Engrais azoté</term>
<term>Floride</term>
<term>Sol sableux</term>
<term>Entisol</term>
<term>Zone subtropicale</term>
<term>Texture</term>
<term><<>></term>
<term>Calendrier des irrigations</term>
<term>Dose d'application</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">This study examined the effect of irrigation rates, nitrogen (N) fertilizer rates, and methods of applying N on growth and productivity of young (3 to 5 years old) and maturing (8 to 10 years old) citrus trees. A long-term study was conducted with the following objectives: 1) to measure the main effects of N rate, N application method, and irrigation on citrus tree growth and production from planting to maturity; 2) to establish growth and production relationships for long-term N rates and irrigation on well-drained sandy Entisols; and 3) to determine the effect of split fertilizer applications at two soil moisture regimes on citrus growth and production for two tree age classes as trees mature. Irrigation was applied using two selected ranges of soil moisture tensions and annual N rate varied by tree age as percentages of recommended. Methods of applying N included a dry granular fertilizer (DGF) containing soluble N applied four times annually or a controlled-release fertilizer (CRF) applied once per year and fertigation applied either four (FG04) or 30 (FG30) times annually. Canopy size and yield were higher with the moderate irrigation rate compared with the low rate for both young and maturing trees. Critical N rates for both canopy volume and yield were between 178 and 200 kg.ha
<sup>-1</sup>
. The CRF and FG30 treatments produced larger trees and higher yields compared with FG04 and DGF in the young tree study, indicating that younger trees benefitted from frequent split fertilizer applications. As the trees matured and filled their allocated space, the two irrigation rates were continued and N was applied at six rates using either DGF or FG30. For these 8- to 10-year-old trees, critical values of N application rates were 210 and 204 kg.ha
<sup>-1</sup>
for DGF and FG30, respectively. The absence of a significant interaction between N rate and application method indicated that N uptake efficiency was similar for all application methods tested. DGF and FG30 treatments resulted in similar maturing tree yields and fruit total soluble solids. Canopy volumes, for the same trees, were significantly greater all 3 years with the FG30 treatment compared with DGF. Thus, if increase in tree size is desired, increased number of split applications will likely promote tree growth; however, little increase in fruit yield may be obtained.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist>
<standard h6="B">
<pA>
<fA01 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>0018-5345</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01">
<s0>HJHSAR</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1">
<s0>HortScience</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05>
<s2>44</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06>
<s2>1</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG">
<s1>Response of Young and Maturing Citrus Trees Grown on a Sandy Soil to Irrigation Scheduling, Nitrogen Fertilizer Rate, and Nitrogen Application Method</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1">
<s1>MORGAN (Kelly T.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1">
<s1>ADAIR WHEATON (T.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1">
<s1>CASTLE (William S.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="04" i2="1">
<s1>PARSONS (Laurence R.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Soil and Water Science Department, University of Florida, Southwest Florida REC, 2686 Sr 29 N</s1>
<s2>Immokalee, FL 34142</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="02">
<s1>Horticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida, Citrus REC, 700 Experiment Station Road</s1>
<s2>Lake Alfred, FL 33850</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20>
<s1>145-150</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21>
<s1>2009</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01">
<s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01">
<s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>13300</s2>
<s5>354000186415150300</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44>
<s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2009 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45>
<s0>1/4 p.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>09-0092546</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60>
<s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61>
<s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>HortScience</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01">
<s0>USA</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG">
<s0>This study examined the effect of irrigation rates, nitrogen (N) fertilizer rates, and methods of applying N on growth and productivity of young (3 to 5 years old) and maturing (8 to 10 years old) citrus trees. A long-term study was conducted with the following objectives: 1) to measure the main effects of N rate, N application method, and irrigation on citrus tree growth and production from planting to maturity; 2) to establish growth and production relationships for long-term N rates and irrigation on well-drained sandy Entisols; and 3) to determine the effect of split fertilizer applications at two soil moisture regimes on citrus growth and production for two tree age classes as trees mature. Irrigation was applied using two selected ranges of soil moisture tensions and annual N rate varied by tree age as percentages of recommended. Methods of applying N included a dry granular fertilizer (DGF) containing soluble N applied four times annually or a controlled-release fertilizer (CRF) applied once per year and fertigation applied either four (FG04) or 30 (FG30) times annually. Canopy size and yield were higher with the moderate irrigation rate compared with the low rate for both young and maturing trees. Critical N rates for both canopy volume and yield were between 178 and 200 kg.ha
<sup>-1</sup>
. The CRF and FG30 treatments produced larger trees and higher yields compared with FG04 and DGF in the young tree study, indicating that younger trees benefitted from frequent split fertilizer applications. As the trees matured and filled their allocated space, the two irrigation rates were continued and N was applied at six rates using either DGF or FG30. For these 8- to 10-year-old trees, critical values of N application rates were 210 and 204 kg.ha
<sup>-1</sup>
for DGF and FG30, respectively. The absence of a significant interaction between N rate and application method indicated that N uptake efficiency was similar for all application methods tested. DGF and FG30 treatments resulted in similar maturing tree yields and fruit total soluble solids. Canopy volumes, for the same trees, were significantly greater all 3 years with the FG30 treatment compared with DGF. Thus, if increase in tree size is desired, increased number of split applications will likely promote tree growth; however, little increase in fruit yield may be obtained.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X">
<s0>002A32C02C1</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Réponse</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Response</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Respuesta</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Maturation</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Ripening</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Maduración</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Arbre fruitier</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Fruit tree</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Arbol frutal</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Irrigation fertilisante</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Fertigation</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Riego fertilizante</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Fertilisation azotée</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Nitrogen fertilization</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Fertilización nitrogenada</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Méthode</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Method</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Método</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Nutrition</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Nutrition</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Nutrición</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Engrais action lente</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Slow releasing fertilizer</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Abono acción lenta</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Horticulture</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Horticulture</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Horticultura</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Agrume</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Citrus fruit</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Agrios</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Rutaceae</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Rutaceae</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Rutaceae</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Citrus sinensis</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Citrus sinensis</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Citrus sinensis</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Engrais azoté</s0>
<s5>15</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Nitrogen fertilizer</s0>
<s5>15</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Fertilizante nitrogenado</s0>
<s5>15</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="14" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Floride</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="14" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Florida</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="14" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Florida</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="15" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Sol sableux</s0>
<s2>NT</s2>
<s5>24</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="15" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Sandy soil</s0>
<s2>NT</s2>
<s5>24</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="15" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Suelo arenoso</s0>
<s2>NT</s2>
<s5>24</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="16" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Entisol</s0>
<s2>NT</s2>
<s5>25</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="16" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Entisols</s0>
<s2>NT</s2>
<s5>25</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="16" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Entisols</s0>
<s2>NT</s2>
<s5>25</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="17" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Zone subtropicale</s0>
<s5>28</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="17" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Subtropical zone</s0>
<s5>28</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="17" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Zona subtropical</s0>
<s5>28</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="18" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Texture</s0>
<s5>29</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="18" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Texture</s0>
<s5>29</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="18" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Textura</s0>
<s5>29</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="19" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0><<>></s0>
<s4>INC</s4>
<s5>68</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="20" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Calendrier des irrigations</s0>
<s4>CD</s4>
<s5>96</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="20" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Irrigation scheduling</s0>
<s4>CD</s4>
<s5>96</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="20" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Calendario de los riegos</s0>
<s4>CD</s4>
<s5>96</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="21" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Dose d'application</s0>
<s4>CD</s4>
<s5>97</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="21" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Application rates</s0>
<s4>CD</s4>
<s5>97</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="21" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Dosis de aplicación</s0>
<s4>CD</s4>
<s5>97</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Dicotyledones</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Dicotyledones</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Dicotyledones</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Angiospermae</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Angiospermae</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Angiospermae</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Spermatophyta</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Spermatophyta</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Spermatophyta</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Etats-Unis</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>United States</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Estados Unidos</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Amérique du Nord</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>North America</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>America del norte</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Amérique</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>America</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>America</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Sol minéral</s0>
<s2>NT</s2>
<s5>27</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Mineral soils</s0>
<s2>NT</s2>
<s5>27</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Suelo mineral</s0>
<s2>NT</s2>
<s5>27</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Plante fruitière</s0>
<s5>31</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Fruit crop</s0>
<s5>31</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Planta frutal</s0>
<s5>31</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Propriété physique</s0>
<s5>33</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Physical properties</s0>
<s5>33</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Propiedad física</s0>
<s5>33</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="10" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Type de sol textural</s0>
<s4>INC</s4>
<s5>69</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="11" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Etats du Sud Est (EU)</s0>
<s4>INC</s4>
<s5>70</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="12" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Type de sol</s0>
<s4>INC</s4>
<s5>71</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="13" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Type de sol chimique</s0>
<s4>INC</s4>
<s5>90</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="14" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Etats du Sud (EU)</s0>
<s4>INC</s4>
<s5>91</s5>
</fC07>
<fN21>
<s1>068</s1>
</fN21>
<fN44 i1="01">
<s1>OTO</s1>
</fN44>
<fN82>
<s1>OTO</s1>
</fN82>
</pA>
</standard>
<server>
<NO>PASCAL 09-0092546 INIST</NO>
<ET>Response of Young and Maturing Citrus Trees Grown on a Sandy Soil to Irrigation Scheduling, Nitrogen Fertilizer Rate, and Nitrogen Application Method</ET>
<AU>MORGAN (Kelly T.); ADAIR WHEATON (T.); CASTLE (William S.); PARSONS (Laurence R.)</AU>
<AF>Soil and Water Science Department, University of Florida, Southwest Florida REC, 2686 Sr 29 N/Immokalee, FL 34142/Etats-Unis (1 aut.); Horticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida, Citrus REC, 700 Experiment Station Road/Lake Alfred, FL 33850/Etats-Unis (2 aut., 3 aut., 4 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>HortScience; ISSN 0018-5345; Coden HJHSAR; Etats-Unis; Da. 2009; Vol. 44; No. 1; Pp. 145-150; Bibl. 1/4 p.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>This study examined the effect of irrigation rates, nitrogen (N) fertilizer rates, and methods of applying N on growth and productivity of young (3 to 5 years old) and maturing (8 to 10 years old) citrus trees. A long-term study was conducted with the following objectives: 1) to measure the main effects of N rate, N application method, and irrigation on citrus tree growth and production from planting to maturity; 2) to establish growth and production relationships for long-term N rates and irrigation on well-drained sandy Entisols; and 3) to determine the effect of split fertilizer applications at two soil moisture regimes on citrus growth and production for two tree age classes as trees mature. Irrigation was applied using two selected ranges of soil moisture tensions and annual N rate varied by tree age as percentages of recommended. Methods of applying N included a dry granular fertilizer (DGF) containing soluble N applied four times annually or a controlled-release fertilizer (CRF) applied once per year and fertigation applied either four (FG04) or 30 (FG30) times annually. Canopy size and yield were higher with the moderate irrigation rate compared with the low rate for both young and maturing trees. Critical N rates for both canopy volume and yield were between 178 and 200 kg.ha
<sup>-1</sup>
. The CRF and FG30 treatments produced larger trees and higher yields compared with FG04 and DGF in the young tree study, indicating that younger trees benefitted from frequent split fertilizer applications. As the trees matured and filled their allocated space, the two irrigation rates were continued and N was applied at six rates using either DGF or FG30. For these 8- to 10-year-old trees, critical values of N application rates were 210 and 204 kg.ha
<sup>-1</sup>
for DGF and FG30, respectively. The absence of a significant interaction between N rate and application method indicated that N uptake efficiency was similar for all application methods tested. DGF and FG30 treatments resulted in similar maturing tree yields and fruit total soluble solids. Canopy volumes, for the same trees, were significantly greater all 3 years with the FG30 treatment compared with DGF. Thus, if increase in tree size is desired, increased number of split applications will likely promote tree growth; however, little increase in fruit yield may be obtained.</EA>
<CC>002A32C02C1</CC>
<FD>Réponse; Maturation; Arbre fruitier; Irrigation fertilisante; Fertilisation azotée; Méthode; Nutrition; Engrais action lente; Horticulture; Agrume; Rutaceae; Citrus sinensis; Engrais azoté; Floride; Sol sableux; Entisol; Zone subtropicale; Texture; <<>>; Calendrier des irrigations; Dose d'application</FD>
<FG>Dicotyledones; Angiospermae; Spermatophyta; Etats-Unis; Amérique du Nord; Amérique; Sol minéral; Plante fruitière; Propriété physique; Type de sol textural; Etats du Sud Est (EU); Type de sol; Type de sol chimique; Etats du Sud (EU)</FG>
<ED>Response; Ripening; Fruit tree; Fertigation; Nitrogen fertilization; Method; Nutrition; Slow releasing fertilizer; Horticulture; Citrus fruit; Rutaceae; Citrus sinensis; Nitrogen fertilizer; Florida; Sandy soil; Entisols; Subtropical zone; Texture; Irrigation scheduling; Application rates</ED>
<EG>Dicotyledones; Angiospermae; Spermatophyta; United States; North America; America; Mineral soils; Fruit crop; Physical properties</EG>
<SD>Respuesta; Maduración; Arbol frutal; Riego fertilizante; Fertilización nitrogenada; Método; Nutrición; Abono acción lenta; Horticultura; Agrios; Rutaceae; Citrus sinensis; Fertilizante nitrogenado; Florida; Suelo arenoso; Entisols; Zona subtropical; Textura; Calendario de los riegos; Dosis de aplicación</SD>
<LO>INIST-13300.354000186415150300</LO>
<ID>09-0092546</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Bois/explor/OrangerV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000348 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000348 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Bois
   |area=    OrangerV1
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Pascal:09-0092546
   |texte=   Response of Young and Maturing Citrus Trees Grown on a Sandy Soil to Irrigation Scheduling, Nitrogen Fertilizer Rate, and Nitrogen Application Method
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.25.
Data generation: Sat Dec 3 17:11:04 2016. Site generation: Wed Mar 6 18:18:32 2024