Growth, compatible solute and salt accumulation of five mycorrhizal fungal species grown over a range of NaCl concentrations.
Identifieur interne : 003425 ( Main/Corpus ); précédent : 003424; suivant : 003426Growth, compatible solute and salt accumulation of five mycorrhizal fungal species grown over a range of NaCl concentrations.
Auteurs : G. Bois ; A. Bertrand ; Y. Piché ; M. Fung ; D P KhasaSource :
- Mycorrhiza [ 0940-6360 ] ; 2006.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- chemical , metabolism : Chlorine, Mannitol, Proline, Sodium, Soil Pollutants, Trehalose.
- chemical : Culture Media, Sodium Chloride.
- metabolism : Mycelium.
- physiology : Mycorrhizae.
- Soil Microbiology, Species Specificity.
Abstract
The oil sand industry in northeastern Alberta produces vast areas of severely disturbed land. The sodicity of these anthropic soils is one of the principal constraints that impede their revegetation. Previous in vitro studies have shown that the ectomycorrhizal fungi Laccaria bicolor (Maire) Orton UAMH 8232 and Hebeloma crustuliniforme (Bull) Quel. UAMH 5247 have certain salt-resistant traits and thus are candidate species for the inoculation of tree seedlings to be outplanted on salt-affected soil. In this study, the in vitro development of these fungi was compared to that of three mycorrhizal fungi [Suillus tomentosus (Kauff.) Sing., Snell and Dick; Hymenoscyphus sp. and Phialocephala sp.] isolated from a sodic site created by Syncrude Canada Ltd. Their growth, osmotica and Na/Cl contents were assessed over a range (0, 50, 100, 200 mM) of NaCl concentrations. After 21 days, the two ascomycetes (Hymenoscyphus sp. and Phialocephala sp.) were shown to be more resistant to the NaCl treatments than the three basidiomycete species. Of the basidiomycetes, L. bicolor was the most sensitive to NaCl stress, while H. crustuliniforme showed greater water stress resistance, and the S. tomentosus isolate exhibited greater Na and Cl filtering capacities and had a better biomass yield over the NaCl gradient tested. Both ascomycetes used mechanisms other than carbohydrate accumulation to palliate NaCl stress. While the Hymenoscyphus isolate accumulated proline in response to NaCl treatments, the darker Phialocephala isolate may have used compounds such as melanin. The basidiomycete species accumulated mainly mannitol and/or proline in response to increasing concentrations of NaCl.
DOI: 10.1007/s00572-005-0020-y
PubMed: 16261378
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:16261378Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Growth, compatible solute and salt accumulation of five mycorrhizal fungal species grown over a range of NaCl concentrations.</title><author><name sortKey="Bois, G" sort="Bois, G" uniqKey="Bois G" first="G" last="Bois">G. Bois</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Centre de Recherche en Biologie Forestière, Pavillon C.-E.-Marchand, Université Laval, G1K 7P4, Québec (Québec), Canada. Gregory.bois@rsvs.ulaval.ca.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Laboratoire de mycologie, local 2110, Pavillon C.-E.-Marchand, Université Laval, G1K 7P4, Québec (Québec), Canada. Gregory.bois@rsvs.ulaval.ca.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Bertrand, A" sort="Bertrand, A" uniqKey="Bertrand A" first="A" last="Bertrand">A. Bertrand</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Soils and Crops Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 2560 Blvd. Hochelaga, G1V 2J3, Sainte-Foy (Québec), Canada.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Piche, Y" sort="Piche, Y" uniqKey="Piche Y" first="Y" last="Piché">Y. Piché</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Centre de Recherche en Biologie Forestière, Pavillon C.-E.-Marchand, Université Laval, G1K 7P4, Québec (Québec), Canada.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Fung, M" sort="Fung, M" uniqKey="Fung M" first="M" last="Fung">M. Fung</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Syncrude Canada Ltd., Environmental Affairs Department, P.O. Bag 4009, M.D. 0078, T9H 3L1, Fort McMurray (Alberta), Canada.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Khasa, D P" sort="Khasa, D P" uniqKey="Khasa D" first="D P" last="Khasa">D P Khasa</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Centre de Recherche en Biologie Forestière, Pavillon C.-E.-Marchand, Université Laval, G1K 7P4, Québec (Québec), Canada.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2006">2006</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:16261378</idno><idno type="pmid">16261378</idno><idno type="doi">10.1007/s00572-005-0020-y</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">003425</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">003425</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Growth, compatible solute and salt accumulation of five mycorrhizal fungal species grown over a range of NaCl concentrations.</title><author><name sortKey="Bois, G" sort="Bois, G" uniqKey="Bois G" first="G" last="Bois">G. Bois</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Centre de Recherche en Biologie Forestière, Pavillon C.-E.-Marchand, Université Laval, G1K 7P4, Québec (Québec), Canada. Gregory.bois@rsvs.ulaval.ca.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Laboratoire de mycologie, local 2110, Pavillon C.-E.-Marchand, Université Laval, G1K 7P4, Québec (Québec), Canada. Gregory.bois@rsvs.ulaval.ca.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Bertrand, A" sort="Bertrand, A" uniqKey="Bertrand A" first="A" last="Bertrand">A. Bertrand</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Soils and Crops Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 2560 Blvd. Hochelaga, G1V 2J3, Sainte-Foy (Québec), Canada.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Piche, Y" sort="Piche, Y" uniqKey="Piche Y" first="Y" last="Piché">Y. Piché</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Centre de Recherche en Biologie Forestière, Pavillon C.-E.-Marchand, Université Laval, G1K 7P4, Québec (Québec), Canada.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Fung, M" sort="Fung, M" uniqKey="Fung M" first="M" last="Fung">M. Fung</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Syncrude Canada Ltd., Environmental Affairs Department, P.O. Bag 4009, M.D. 0078, T9H 3L1, Fort McMurray (Alberta), Canada.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Khasa, D P" sort="Khasa, D P" uniqKey="Khasa D" first="D P" last="Khasa">D P Khasa</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Centre de Recherche en Biologie Forestière, Pavillon C.-E.-Marchand, Université Laval, G1K 7P4, Québec (Québec), Canada.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Mycorrhiza</title><idno type="ISSN">0940-6360</idno><imprint><date when="2006" type="published">2006</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Chlorine (metabolism)</term><term>Culture Media (MeSH)</term><term>Mannitol (metabolism)</term><term>Mycelium (metabolism)</term><term>Mycorrhizae (physiology)</term><term>Proline (metabolism)</term><term>Sodium (metabolism)</term><term>Sodium Chloride (MeSH)</term><term>Soil Microbiology (MeSH)</term><term>Soil Pollutants (metabolism)</term><term>Species Specificity (MeSH)</term><term>Trehalose (metabolism)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="metabolism" xml:lang="en"><term>Chlorine</term><term>Mannitol</term><term>Proline</term><term>Sodium</term><term>Soil Pollutants</term><term>Trehalose</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Culture Media</term><term>Sodium Chloride</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="metabolism" xml:lang="en"><term>Mycelium</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Mycorrhizae</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Soil Microbiology</term><term>Species Specificity</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The oil sand industry in northeastern Alberta produces vast areas of severely disturbed land. The sodicity of these anthropic soils is one of the principal constraints that impede their revegetation. Previous in vitro studies have shown that the ectomycorrhizal fungi Laccaria bicolor (Maire) Orton UAMH 8232 and Hebeloma crustuliniforme (Bull) Quel. UAMH 5247 have certain salt-resistant traits and thus are candidate species for the inoculation of tree seedlings to be outplanted on salt-affected soil. In this study, the in vitro development of these fungi was compared to that of three mycorrhizal fungi [Suillus tomentosus (Kauff.) Sing., Snell and Dick; Hymenoscyphus sp. and Phialocephala sp.] isolated from a sodic site created by Syncrude Canada Ltd. Their growth, osmotica and Na/Cl contents were assessed over a range (0, 50, 100, 200 mM) of NaCl concentrations. After 21 days, the two ascomycetes (Hymenoscyphus sp. and Phialocephala sp.) were shown to be more resistant to the NaCl treatments than the three basidiomycete species. Of the basidiomycetes, L. bicolor was the most sensitive to NaCl stress, while H. crustuliniforme showed greater water stress resistance, and the S. tomentosus isolate exhibited greater Na and Cl filtering capacities and had a better biomass yield over the NaCl gradient tested. Both ascomycetes used mechanisms other than carbohydrate accumulation to palliate NaCl stress. While the Hymenoscyphus isolate accumulated proline in response to NaCl treatments, the darker Phialocephala isolate may have used compounds such as melanin. The basidiomycete species accumulated mainly mannitol and/or proline in response to increasing concentrations of NaCl.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">16261378</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2007</Year><Month>03</Month><Day>22</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2018</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>13</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0940-6360</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>16</Volume><Issue>2</Issue><PubDate><Year>2006</Year><Month>Mar</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Mycorrhiza</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Mycorrhiza</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Growth, compatible solute and salt accumulation of five mycorrhizal fungal species grown over a range of NaCl concentrations.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>99-109</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1007/s00572-005-0020-y</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>The oil sand industry in northeastern Alberta produces vast areas of severely disturbed land. The sodicity of these anthropic soils is one of the principal constraints that impede their revegetation. Previous in vitro studies have shown that the ectomycorrhizal fungi Laccaria bicolor (Maire) Orton UAMH 8232 and Hebeloma crustuliniforme (Bull) Quel. UAMH 5247 have certain salt-resistant traits and thus are candidate species for the inoculation of tree seedlings to be outplanted on salt-affected soil. In this study, the in vitro development of these fungi was compared to that of three mycorrhizal fungi [Suillus tomentosus (Kauff.) Sing., Snell and Dick; Hymenoscyphus sp. and Phialocephala sp.] isolated from a sodic site created by Syncrude Canada Ltd. Their growth, osmotica and Na/Cl contents were assessed over a range (0, 50, 100, 200 mM) of NaCl concentrations. After 21 days, the two ascomycetes (Hymenoscyphus sp. and Phialocephala sp.) were shown to be more resistant to the NaCl treatments than the three basidiomycete species. Of the basidiomycetes, L. bicolor was the most sensitive to NaCl stress, while H. crustuliniforme showed greater water stress resistance, and the S. tomentosus isolate exhibited greater Na and Cl filtering capacities and had a better biomass yield over the NaCl gradient tested. Both ascomycetes used mechanisms other than carbohydrate accumulation to palliate NaCl stress. While the Hymenoscyphus isolate accumulated proline in response to NaCl treatments, the darker Phialocephala isolate may have used compounds such as melanin. The basidiomycete species accumulated mainly mannitol and/or proline in response to increasing concentrations of NaCl.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Bois</LastName><ForeName>G</ForeName><Initials>G</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Centre de Recherche en Biologie Forestière, Pavillon C.-E.-Marchand, Université Laval, G1K 7P4, Québec (Québec), Canada. Gregory.bois@rsvs.ulaval.ca.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Laboratoire de mycologie, local 2110, Pavillon C.-E.-Marchand, Université Laval, G1K 7P4, Québec (Québec), Canada. Gregory.bois@rsvs.ulaval.ca.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Bertrand</LastName><ForeName>A</ForeName><Initials>A</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Soils and Crops Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 2560 Blvd. Hochelaga, G1V 2J3, Sainte-Foy (Québec), Canada.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Piché</LastName><ForeName>Y</ForeName><Initials>Y</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Centre de Recherche en Biologie Forestière, Pavillon C.-E.-Marchand, Université Laval, G1K 7P4, Québec (Québec), Canada.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Fung</LastName><ForeName>M</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Syncrude Canada Ltd., Environmental Affairs Department, P.O. Bag 4009, M.D. 0078, T9H 3L1, Fort McMurray (Alberta), Canada.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Khasa</LastName><ForeName>D P</ForeName><Initials>DP</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Centre de Recherche en Biologie Forestière, Pavillon C.-E.-Marchand, Université Laval, G1K 7P4, Québec (Québec), Canada.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2005</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>28</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Germany</Country><MedlineTA>Mycorrhiza</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>100955036</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0940-6360</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D003470">Culture Media</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D012989">Soil Pollutants</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>3OWL53L36A</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D008353">Mannitol</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>451W47IQ8X</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D012965">Sodium Chloride</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>4R7X1O2820</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D002713">Chlorine</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>9DLQ4CIU6V</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D011392">Proline</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>9NEZ333N27</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D012964">Sodium</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>B8WCK70T7I</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D014199">Trehalose</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D002713" MajorTopicYN="N">Chlorine</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000378" MajorTopicYN="N">metabolism</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003470" MajorTopicYN="N">Culture Media</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008353" MajorTopicYN="N">Mannitol</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000378" MajorTopicYN="N">metabolism</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D025282" MajorTopicYN="N">Mycelium</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000378" MajorTopicYN="N">metabolism</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D038821" MajorTopicYN="N">Mycorrhizae</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="Y">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011392" MajorTopicYN="N">Proline</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000378" MajorTopicYN="N">metabolism</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012964" MajorTopicYN="N">Sodium</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000378" MajorTopicYN="N">metabolism</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012965" MajorTopicYN="N">Sodium Chloride</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012988" MajorTopicYN="N">Soil Microbiology</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012989" MajorTopicYN="N">Soil Pollutants</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000378" MajorTopicYN="N">metabolism</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013045" MajorTopicYN="N">Species Specificity</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014199" MajorTopicYN="N">Trehalose</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000378" MajorTopicYN="N">metabolism</QualifierName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2005</Year><Month>01</Month><Day>10</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2005</Year><Month>09</Month><Day>07</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2005</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>2</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2007</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>23</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2005</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>2</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16261378</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1007/s00572-005-0020-y</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">10.1007/s00572-005-0020-y</ArticleId></ArticleIdList><ReferenceList><Reference><Citation>Mycorrhiza. 2005 May;15(3):149-58</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15883852</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Gen Microbiol. 1972 Oct;72(3):589-91</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">4404634</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Plant Physiol. 1995 Nov;109(3):735-742</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12228628</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 1990 Oct;58(3):209-17</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">2256682</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mycorrhiza. 2002 Oct;12(5):249-55</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12375136</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1997 Apr;47(4):405-11</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">9163955</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Trends Plant Sci. 2001 Feb;6(2):66-71</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11173290</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Science. 1984 Feb 17;223(4637):701-3</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17841031</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2002;53:247-73</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12221975</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mycorrhiza. 1998 Feb;7(5):261-5</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24578052</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Phytopathology. 1969 Apr;59(4):411-7</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">5811914</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Biol Chem. 2000 Jun 9;275(23):17249-55</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">10748181</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Plant Physiol. 2004 Sep;136(1):2579-86</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15375206</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Adv Microb Physiol. 1984;25:149-93</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">6099966</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Plant Physiol. 1999 Sep;121(1):45-52</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">10482659</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 2000 Jun;51:463-499</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15012199</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Arch Microbiol. 2000 Oct;174(4):217-24</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11081789</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference></ReferenceList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Bois/explor/MycorrhizaeV1/Data/Main/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003425 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 003425 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Bois
|area= MycorrhizaeV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:16261378
|texte= Growth, compatible solute and salt accumulation of five mycorrhizal fungal species grown over a range of NaCl concentrations.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:16261378" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a MycorrhizaeV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.37. |  |