Soil-strain compatibility: the key to effective use of arbuscular mycorrhizal inoculants?
Identifieur interne : 002633 ( Main/Corpus ); précédent : 002632; suivant : 002634Soil-strain compatibility: the key to effective use of arbuscular mycorrhizal inoculants?
Auteurs : Ricardo A. Herrera-Peraza ; Chantal Hamel ; Félix Fernández ; Roberto L. Ferrer ; Eduardo FurrazolaSource :
- Mycorrhiza [ 1432-1890 ] ; 2011.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- growth & development : Coffea, Fungi, Mycorrhizae.
- microbiology : Coffea.
- physiology : Coffea, Fungi, Mycorrhizae.
- Host Specificity, Soil Microbiology, Symbiosis.
Abstract
Consistency of response to arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) inoculation is required for efficient use of AM fungi in plant production. Here, we found that the response triggered in plants by an AM strain depends on the properties of the soil where it is introduced. Two data sets from 130 different experiments assessing the outcome of a total of 548 replicated single inoculation trials conducted either in soils with a history of (1) high input agriculture (HIA; 343 replicated trials) or (2) in more pristine soils from coffee plantations (CA; 205 replicated trials) were examined. Plant response to inoculation with different AM strains in CA soils planted with coffee was related to soil properties associated with soil types. The strains Glomus fasciculatum-like and Glomus etunicatum-like were particularly performant in soil relatively rich in nutrients and organic matter. Paraglomus occultum and Glomus mosseae-like performed best in relatively poor soils, and G. mosseae and Glomus manihotis did best in soils of medium fertility. Acaulospora scrobiculata, Diversispora spurca, G. mosseae-like, G. mosseae and P. occultum stimulated coffee growth best in Chromic, Eutric Alluvial Cambisol, G. fasciculatum-like and G. etunicatum-like in Calcaric Cambisol and G. manihotis, in Chromic, Eutric Cambisols. Acaulospora scrobiculata and Diversispora spurca strains performed best in Chromic Alisols and Rodic Ferralsols. There was no significant relationship between plant response to AM fungal strains and soil properties in the HIA soil data set, may be due to variation induced by the use of different host plant species and to modification of soil properties by a history of intensive production. Consideration of the performance of AM fungal strains in target soil environments may well be the key for efficient management of the AM symbiosis in plant production.
DOI: 10.1007/s00572-010-0322-6
PubMed: 20552233
PubMed Central: PMC3058370
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:20552233Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Soil-strain compatibility: the key to effective use of arbuscular mycorrhizal inoculants?</title>
<author><name sortKey="Herrera Peraza, Ricardo A" sort="Herrera Peraza, Ricardo A" uniqKey="Herrera Peraza R" first="Ricardo A" last="Herrera-Peraza">Ricardo A. Herrera-Peraza</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Instituto de Ecología y Sistemática, IES, CITMA, Havana, Cuba.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Hamel, Chantal" sort="Hamel, Chantal" uniqKey="Hamel C" first="Chantal" last="Hamel">Chantal Hamel</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Fernandez, Felix" sort="Fernandez, Felix" uniqKey="Fernandez F" first="Félix" last="Fernández">Félix Fernández</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Ferrer, Roberto L" sort="Ferrer, Roberto L" uniqKey="Ferrer R" first="Roberto L" last="Ferrer">Roberto L. Ferrer</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Furrazola, Eduardo" sort="Furrazola, Eduardo" uniqKey="Furrazola E" first="Eduardo" last="Furrazola">Eduardo Furrazola</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2011">2011</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:20552233</idno>
<idno type="pmid">20552233</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.1007/s00572-010-0322-6</idno>
<idno type="pmc">PMC3058370</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">002633</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">002633</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Soil-strain compatibility: the key to effective use of arbuscular mycorrhizal inoculants?</title>
<author><name sortKey="Herrera Peraza, Ricardo A" sort="Herrera Peraza, Ricardo A" uniqKey="Herrera Peraza R" first="Ricardo A" last="Herrera-Peraza">Ricardo A. Herrera-Peraza</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Instituto de Ecología y Sistemática, IES, CITMA, Havana, Cuba.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Hamel, Chantal" sort="Hamel, Chantal" uniqKey="Hamel C" first="Chantal" last="Hamel">Chantal Hamel</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Fernandez, Felix" sort="Fernandez, Felix" uniqKey="Fernandez F" first="Félix" last="Fernández">Félix Fernández</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Ferrer, Roberto L" sort="Ferrer, Roberto L" uniqKey="Ferrer R" first="Roberto L" last="Ferrer">Roberto L. Ferrer</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Furrazola, Eduardo" sort="Furrazola, Eduardo" uniqKey="Furrazola E" first="Eduardo" last="Furrazola">Eduardo Furrazola</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j">Mycorrhiza</title>
<idno type="eISSN">1432-1890</idno>
<imprint><date when="2011" type="published">2011</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Coffea (growth & development)</term>
<term>Coffea (microbiology)</term>
<term>Coffea (physiology)</term>
<term>Fungi (growth & development)</term>
<term>Fungi (physiology)</term>
<term>Host Specificity (MeSH)</term>
<term>Mycorrhizae (growth & development)</term>
<term>Mycorrhizae (physiology)</term>
<term>Soil Microbiology (MeSH)</term>
<term>Symbiosis (MeSH)</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="growth & development" xml:lang="en"><term>Coffea</term>
<term>Fungi</term>
<term>Mycorrhizae</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="microbiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Coffea</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Coffea</term>
<term>Fungi</term>
<term>Mycorrhizae</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Host Specificity</term>
<term>Soil Microbiology</term>
<term>Symbiosis</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Consistency of response to arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) inoculation is required for efficient use of AM fungi in plant production. Here, we found that the response triggered in plants by an AM strain depends on the properties of the soil where it is introduced. Two data sets from 130 different experiments assessing the outcome of a total of 548 replicated single inoculation trials conducted either in soils with a history of (1) high input agriculture (HIA; 343 replicated trials) or (2) in more pristine soils from coffee plantations (CA; 205 replicated trials) were examined. Plant response to inoculation with different AM strains in CA soils planted with coffee was related to soil properties associated with soil types. The strains Glomus fasciculatum-like and Glomus etunicatum-like were particularly performant in soil relatively rich in nutrients and organic matter. Paraglomus occultum and Glomus mosseae-like performed best in relatively poor soils, and G. mosseae and Glomus manihotis did best in soils of medium fertility. Acaulospora scrobiculata, Diversispora spurca, G. mosseae-like, G. mosseae and P. occultum stimulated coffee growth best in Chromic, Eutric Alluvial Cambisol, G. fasciculatum-like and G. etunicatum-like in Calcaric Cambisol and G. manihotis, in Chromic, Eutric Cambisols. Acaulospora scrobiculata and Diversispora spurca strains performed best in Chromic Alisols and Rodic Ferralsols. There was no significant relationship between plant response to AM fungal strains and soil properties in the HIA soil data set, may be due to variation induced by the use of different host plant species and to modification of soil properties by a history of intensive production. Consideration of the performance of AM fungal strains in target soil environments may well be the key for efficient management of the AM symbiosis in plant production.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">20552233</PMID>
<DateCompleted><Year>2011</Year>
<Month>07</Month>
<Day>12</Day>
</DateCompleted>
<DateRevised><Year>2018</Year>
<Month>11</Month>
<Day>13</Day>
</DateRevised>
<Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1432-1890</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>21</Volume>
<Issue>3</Issue>
<PubDate><Year>2011</Year>
<Month>Apr</Month>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>Mycorrhiza</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>Mycorrhiza</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Soil-strain compatibility: the key to effective use of arbuscular mycorrhizal inoculants?</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination><MedlinePgn>183-93</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1007/s00572-010-0322-6</ELocationID>
<Abstract><AbstractText>Consistency of response to arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) inoculation is required for efficient use of AM fungi in plant production. Here, we found that the response triggered in plants by an AM strain depends on the properties of the soil where it is introduced. Two data sets from 130 different experiments assessing the outcome of a total of 548 replicated single inoculation trials conducted either in soils with a history of (1) high input agriculture (HIA; 343 replicated trials) or (2) in more pristine soils from coffee plantations (CA; 205 replicated trials) were examined. Plant response to inoculation with different AM strains in CA soils planted with coffee was related to soil properties associated with soil types. The strains Glomus fasciculatum-like and Glomus etunicatum-like were particularly performant in soil relatively rich in nutrients and organic matter. Paraglomus occultum and Glomus mosseae-like performed best in relatively poor soils, and G. mosseae and Glomus manihotis did best in soils of medium fertility. Acaulospora scrobiculata, Diversispora spurca, G. mosseae-like, G. mosseae and P. occultum stimulated coffee growth best in Chromic, Eutric Alluvial Cambisol, G. fasciculatum-like and G. etunicatum-like in Calcaric Cambisol and G. manihotis, in Chromic, Eutric Cambisols. Acaulospora scrobiculata and Diversispora spurca strains performed best in Chromic Alisols and Rodic Ferralsols. There was no significant relationship between plant response to AM fungal strains and soil properties in the HIA soil data set, may be due to variation induced by the use of different host plant species and to modification of soil properties by a history of intensive production. Consideration of the performance of AM fungal strains in target soil environments may well be the key for efficient management of the AM symbiosis in plant production.</AbstractText>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Herrera-Peraza</LastName>
<ForeName>Ricardo A</ForeName>
<Initials>RA</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Instituto de Ecología y Sistemática, IES, CITMA, Havana, Cuba.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Hamel</LastName>
<ForeName>Chantal</ForeName>
<Initials>C</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Fernández</LastName>
<ForeName>Félix</ForeName>
<Initials>F</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Ferrer</LastName>
<ForeName>Roberto L</ForeName>
<Initials>RL</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Furrazola</LastName>
<ForeName>Eduardo</ForeName>
<Initials>E</Initials>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>eng</Language>
<PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D013486">Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
<ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2010</Year>
<Month>06</Month>
<Day>16</Day>
</ArticleDate>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Germany</Country>
<MedlineTA>Mycorrhiza</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>100955036</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>0940-6360</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
<CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset>
<MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D040503" MajorTopicYN="N">Coffea</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000254" MajorTopicYN="N">growth & development</QualifierName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000382" MajorTopicYN="Y">microbiology</QualifierName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="N">physiology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005658" MajorTopicYN="N">Fungi</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000254" MajorTopicYN="Y">growth & development</QualifierName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="N">physiology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D058507" MajorTopicYN="N">Host Specificity</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D038821" MajorTopicYN="N">Mycorrhizae</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000254" MajorTopicYN="Y">growth & development</QualifierName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="N">physiology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012988" MajorTopicYN="Y">Soil Microbiology</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013559" MajorTopicYN="N">Symbiosis</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
</MeshHeadingList>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2009</Year>
<Month>05</Month>
<Day>26</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2010</Year>
<Month>05</Month>
<Day>23</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2010</Year>
<Month>6</Month>
<Day>17</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2010</Year>
<Month>6</Month>
<Day>17</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2011</Year>
<Month>7</Month>
<Day>13</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20552233</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1007/s00572-010-0322-6</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC3058370</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
<ReferenceList><Reference><Citation>Mycorrhiza. 2002 Dec;12(6):285-90</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12466915</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Mol Ecol. 2006 Jul;15(8):2277-89</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16780440</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2007 Nov;62(2):142-60</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17892477</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Microb Ecol. 2010 May;59(4):724-33</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20082070</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Mycorrhiza. 2009 Apr;19(4):255-66</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19104847</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>J Exp Bot. 2009;60(9):2465-80</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19429838</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Nature. 2009 Oct 8;461(7265):716-8</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19812648</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Oecologia. 2008 Nov;158(1):117-27</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18690479</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
</ReferenceList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Bois/explor/MycorrhizaeV1/Data/Main/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002633 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 002633 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Bois |area= MycorrhizaeV1 |flux= Main |étape= Corpus |type= RBID |clé= pubmed:20552233 |texte= Soil-strain compatibility: the key to effective use of arbuscular mycorrhizal inoculants? }}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:20552233" \ | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd \ | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a MycorrhizaeV1
![]() | This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.37. | ![]() |