Ectomycorrhizal fungal communities of native and non-native Pinus and Quercus species in a common garden of 35-year-old trees.
Identifieur interne : 002309 ( Main/Corpus ); précédent : 002308; suivant : 002310Ectomycorrhizal fungal communities of native and non-native Pinus and Quercus species in a common garden of 35-year-old trees.
Auteurs : Lidia K. Trocha ; Izabela Kałucka ; Małgorzata Stasi Ska ; Witold Nowak ; Mirosława Dabert ; Tomasz Leski ; Maria Rudawska ; Jacek OleksynSource :
- Mycorrhiza [ 1432-1890 ] ; 2012.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Biodiversity (MeSH), Ecosystem (MeSH), Fungi (classification), Fungi (genetics), Fungi (isolation & purification), Molecular Sequence Data (MeSH), Mycorrhizae (classification), Mycorrhizae (genetics), Mycorrhizae (isolation & purification), Phylogeny (MeSH), Pinus (growth & development), Pinus (microbiology), Quercus (growth & development), Quercus (microbiology), Trees (microbiology).
- MESH :
- classification : Fungi, Mycorrhizae.
- genetics : Fungi, Mycorrhizae.
- growth & development : Pinus, Quercus.
- isolation & purification : Fungi, Mycorrhizae.
- microbiology : Pinus, Quercus, Trees.
- Biodiversity, Ecosystem, Molecular Sequence Data, Phylogeny.
Abstract
Non-native tree species have been widely planted or have become naturalized in most forested landscapes. It is not clear if native trees species collectively differ in ectomycorrhizal fungal (EMF) diversity and communities from that of non-native tree species. Alternatively, EMF species community similarity may be more determined by host plant phylogeny than by whether the plant is native or non-native. We examined these unknowns by comparing two genera, native and non-native Quercus robur and Quercus rubra and native and non-native Pinus sylvestris and Pinus nigra in a 35-year-old common garden in Poland. Using molecular and morphological approaches, we identified EMF species from ectomycorrhizal root tips and sporocarps collected in the monoculture tree plots. A total of 69 EMF species were found, with 38 species collected only as sporocarps, 18 only as ectomycorrhizas, and 13 both as ectomycorrhizas and sporocarps. The EMF species observed were all native and commonly associated with a Holarctic range in distribution. We found that native Q. robur had ca. 120% higher total EMF species richness than the non-native Q. rubra, while native P. sylvestris had ca. 25% lower total EMF species richness than non-native P. nigra. Thus, across genera, there was no evidence that native species have higher EMF species diversity than exotic species. In addition, we found a higher similarity in EMF communities between the two Pinus species than between the two Quercus species. These results support the naturalization of non-native trees by means of mutualistic associations with cosmopolitan and novel fungi.
DOI: 10.1007/s00572-011-0387-x
PubMed: 21573837
PubMed Central: PMC3261385
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:21573837Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Ectomycorrhizal fungal communities of native and non-native Pinus and Quercus species in a common garden of 35-year-old trees.</title><author><name sortKey="Trocha, Lidia K" sort="Trocha, Lidia K" uniqKey="Trocha L" first="Lidia K" last="Trocha">Lidia K. Trocha</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Institute of Dendrology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Parkowa 5, Kórnik, Poland. lidiatrocha@gazeta.pl</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Kalucka, Izabela" sort="Kalucka, Izabela" uniqKey="Kalucka I" first="Izabela" last="Kałucka">Izabela Kałucka</name></author><author><name sortKey="Stasi Ska, Malgorzata" sort="Stasi Ska, Malgorzata" uniqKey="Stasi Ska M" first="Małgorzata" last="Stasi Ska">Małgorzata Stasi Ska</name></author><author><name sortKey="Nowak, Witold" sort="Nowak, Witold" uniqKey="Nowak W" first="Witold" last="Nowak">Witold Nowak</name></author><author><name sortKey="Dabert, Miroslawa" sort="Dabert, Miroslawa" uniqKey="Dabert M" first="Mirosława" last="Dabert">Mirosława Dabert</name></author><author><name sortKey="Leski, Tomasz" sort="Leski, Tomasz" uniqKey="Leski T" first="Tomasz" last="Leski">Tomasz Leski</name></author><author><name sortKey="Rudawska, Maria" sort="Rudawska, Maria" uniqKey="Rudawska M" first="Maria" last="Rudawska">Maria Rudawska</name></author><author><name sortKey="Oleksyn, Jacek" sort="Oleksyn, Jacek" uniqKey="Oleksyn J" first="Jacek" last="Oleksyn">Jacek Oleksyn</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2012">2012</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:21573837</idno><idno type="pmid">21573837</idno><idno type="doi">10.1007/s00572-011-0387-x</idno><idno type="pmc">PMC3261385</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">002309</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">002309</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Ectomycorrhizal fungal communities of native and non-native Pinus and Quercus species in a common garden of 35-year-old trees.</title><author><name sortKey="Trocha, Lidia K" sort="Trocha, Lidia K" uniqKey="Trocha L" first="Lidia K" last="Trocha">Lidia K. Trocha</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Institute of Dendrology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Parkowa 5, Kórnik, Poland. lidiatrocha@gazeta.pl</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Kalucka, Izabela" sort="Kalucka, Izabela" uniqKey="Kalucka I" first="Izabela" last="Kałucka">Izabela Kałucka</name></author><author><name sortKey="Stasi Ska, Malgorzata" sort="Stasi Ska, Malgorzata" uniqKey="Stasi Ska M" first="Małgorzata" last="Stasi Ska">Małgorzata Stasi Ska</name></author><author><name sortKey="Nowak, Witold" sort="Nowak, Witold" uniqKey="Nowak W" first="Witold" last="Nowak">Witold Nowak</name></author><author><name sortKey="Dabert, Miroslawa" sort="Dabert, Miroslawa" uniqKey="Dabert M" first="Mirosława" last="Dabert">Mirosława Dabert</name></author><author><name sortKey="Leski, Tomasz" sort="Leski, Tomasz" uniqKey="Leski T" first="Tomasz" last="Leski">Tomasz Leski</name></author><author><name sortKey="Rudawska, Maria" sort="Rudawska, Maria" uniqKey="Rudawska M" first="Maria" last="Rudawska">Maria Rudawska</name></author><author><name sortKey="Oleksyn, Jacek" sort="Oleksyn, Jacek" uniqKey="Oleksyn J" first="Jacek" last="Oleksyn">Jacek Oleksyn</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Mycorrhiza</title><idno type="eISSN">1432-1890</idno><imprint><date when="2012" type="published">2012</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Biodiversity (MeSH)</term><term>Ecosystem (MeSH)</term><term>Fungi (classification)</term><term>Fungi (genetics)</term><term>Fungi (isolation & purification)</term><term>Molecular Sequence Data (MeSH)</term><term>Mycorrhizae (classification)</term><term>Mycorrhizae (genetics)</term><term>Mycorrhizae (isolation & purification)</term><term>Phylogeny (MeSH)</term><term>Pinus (growth & development)</term><term>Pinus (microbiology)</term><term>Quercus (growth & development)</term><term>Quercus (microbiology)</term><term>Trees (microbiology)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="classification" xml:lang="en"><term>Fungi</term><term>Mycorrhizae</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="genetics" xml:lang="en"><term>Fungi</term><term>Mycorrhizae</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="growth & development" xml:lang="en"><term>Pinus</term><term>Quercus</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="isolation & purification" xml:lang="en"><term>Fungi</term><term>Mycorrhizae</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="microbiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Pinus</term><term>Quercus</term><term>Trees</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Biodiversity</term><term>Ecosystem</term><term>Molecular Sequence Data</term><term>Phylogeny</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Non-native tree species have been widely planted or have become naturalized in most forested landscapes. It is not clear if native trees species collectively differ in ectomycorrhizal fungal (EMF) diversity and communities from that of non-native tree species. Alternatively, EMF species community similarity may be more determined by host plant phylogeny than by whether the plant is native or non-native. We examined these unknowns by comparing two genera, native and non-native Quercus robur and Quercus rubra and native and non-native Pinus sylvestris and Pinus nigra in a 35-year-old common garden in Poland. Using molecular and morphological approaches, we identified EMF species from ectomycorrhizal root tips and sporocarps collected in the monoculture tree plots. A total of 69 EMF species were found, with 38 species collected only as sporocarps, 18 only as ectomycorrhizas, and 13 both as ectomycorrhizas and sporocarps. The EMF species observed were all native and commonly associated with a Holarctic range in distribution. We found that native Q. robur had ca. 120% higher total EMF species richness than the non-native Q. rubra, while native P. sylvestris had ca. 25% lower total EMF species richness than non-native P. nigra. Thus, across genera, there was no evidence that native species have higher EMF species diversity than exotic species. In addition, we found a higher similarity in EMF communities between the two Pinus species than between the two Quercus species. These results support the naturalization of non-native trees by means of mutualistic associations with cosmopolitan and novel fungi.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">21573837</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2012</Year><Month>05</Month><Day>01</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2018</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>13</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1432-1890</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>22</Volume><Issue>2</Issue><PubDate><Year>2012</Year><Month>Feb</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Mycorrhiza</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Mycorrhiza</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Ectomycorrhizal fungal communities of native and non-native Pinus and Quercus species in a common garden of 35-year-old trees.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>121-34</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1007/s00572-011-0387-x</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>Non-native tree species have been widely planted or have become naturalized in most forested landscapes. It is not clear if native trees species collectively differ in ectomycorrhizal fungal (EMF) diversity and communities from that of non-native tree species. Alternatively, EMF species community similarity may be more determined by host plant phylogeny than by whether the plant is native or non-native. We examined these unknowns by comparing two genera, native and non-native Quercus robur and Quercus rubra and native and non-native Pinus sylvestris and Pinus nigra in a 35-year-old common garden in Poland. Using molecular and morphological approaches, we identified EMF species from ectomycorrhizal root tips and sporocarps collected in the monoculture tree plots. A total of 69 EMF species were found, with 38 species collected only as sporocarps, 18 only as ectomycorrhizas, and 13 both as ectomycorrhizas and sporocarps. The EMF species observed were all native and commonly associated with a Holarctic range in distribution. We found that native Q. robur had ca. 120% higher total EMF species richness than the non-native Q. rubra, while native P. sylvestris had ca. 25% lower total EMF species richness than non-native P. nigra. Thus, across genera, there was no evidence that native species have higher EMF species diversity than exotic species. In addition, we found a higher similarity in EMF communities between the two Pinus species than between the two Quercus species. These results support the naturalization of non-native trees by means of mutualistic associations with cosmopolitan and novel fungi.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Trocha</LastName><ForeName>Lidia K</ForeName><Initials>LK</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Institute of Dendrology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Parkowa 5, Kórnik, Poland. lidiatrocha@gazeta.pl</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Kałucka</LastName><ForeName>Izabela</ForeName><Initials>I</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Stasińska</LastName><ForeName>Małgorzata</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Nowak</LastName><ForeName>Witold</ForeName><Initials>W</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Dabert</LastName><ForeName>Mirosława</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Leski</LastName><ForeName>Tomasz</ForeName><Initials>T</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Rudawska</LastName><ForeName>Maria</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Oleksyn</LastName><ForeName>Jacek</ForeName><Initials>J</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2011</Year><Month>05</Month><Day>15</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Germany</Country><MedlineTA>Mycorrhiza</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>100955036</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0940-6360</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D044822" MajorTopicYN="N">Biodiversity</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017753" MajorTopicYN="N">Ecosystem</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005658" MajorTopicYN="N">Fungi</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000145" MajorTopicYN="N">classification</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000235" MajorTopicYN="N">genetics</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000302" MajorTopicYN="Y">isolation & purification</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008969" MajorTopicYN="N">Molecular Sequence Data</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D038821" MajorTopicYN="N">Mycorrhizae</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000145" MajorTopicYN="N">classification</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000235" MajorTopicYN="N">genetics</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000302" MajorTopicYN="Y">isolation & purification</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010802" MajorTopicYN="N">Phylogeny</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D028223" MajorTopicYN="N">Pinus</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000254" MajorTopicYN="N">growth & development</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000382" MajorTopicYN="Y">microbiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D029963" MajorTopicYN="N">Quercus</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000254" MajorTopicYN="N">growth & development</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000382" MajorTopicYN="Y">microbiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014197" MajorTopicYN="N">Trees</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000382" MajorTopicYN="N">microbiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2010</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>15</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2011</Year><Month>05</Month><Day>02</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2011</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>17</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2011</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>17</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2012</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>2</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21573837</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1007/s00572-011-0387-x</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC3261385</ArticleId></ArticleIdList><ReferenceList><Reference><Citation>Mol Ecol. 1993 Apr;2(2):113-8</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">8180733</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Naturwissenschaften. 2000 Nov;87(11):467-75</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11151665</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2005 May;166(2):619-29</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15819924</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2005 Jun;166(3):993-1009</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15869658</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mycorrhiza. 2006 Mar;16(2):73-9</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16322987</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2006;170(3):445-57</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16626467</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2006;170(3):551-60</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16626476</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2006;171(4):815-24</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16918552</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Ecology. 2006 Sep;87(9):2288-97</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16995629</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Microb Ecol. 2006 Oct;52(3):418-25</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16826321</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2007;174(2):430-40</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17388905</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mol Ecol. 2007 May;16(9):1811-22</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17444894</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mycorrhiza. 2007 Jun;17(4):279-90</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17235552</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2007;175(2):321-33</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17587380</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2008;178(1):167-76</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18194145</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mycologia. 2007 Nov-Dec;99(6):812-9</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18333505</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mycorrhiza. 2008 Mar;18(3):123-32</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18247062</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2008;180(2):479-90</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18631297</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2009;182(2):295-9</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19302178</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Ecology. 2009 Sep;90(9):2352-9</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19769113</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Oecologia. 2010 Feb;162(2):505-13</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19882174</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2010 Jul;187(2):475-84</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20456067</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2009 Mar;181(4):960-73</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19170899</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mycorrhiza. 2011 Jul;21(5):403-12</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21161550</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000 Nov;66(11):4988-91</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11055953</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mol Ecol. 2005 Mar;14(3):829-38</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15723674</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference></ReferenceList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Bois/explor/MycorrhizaeV1/Data/Main/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002309 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 002309 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Bois
|area= MycorrhizaeV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:21573837
|texte= Ectomycorrhizal fungal communities of native and non-native Pinus and Quercus species in a common garden of 35-year-old trees.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:21573837" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a MycorrhizaeV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.37. |  |