Can arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi reduce the growth of agricultural weeds?
Identifieur interne : 002123 ( Main/Corpus ); précédent : 002122; suivant : 002124Can arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi reduce the growth of agricultural weeds?
Auteurs : Rita S L. Veiga ; Jan Jansa ; Emmanuel Frossard ; Marcel G A. Van Der HeijdenSource :
- PloS one [ 1932-6203 ] ; 2011.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Agriculture (methods), Biomass (MeSH), Glomeromycota (metabolism), Mycorrhizae (metabolism), Plant Development (MeSH), Plant Physiological Phenomena (MeSH), Plant Roots (physiology), Plant Weeds (physiology), Plants (microbiology), Seeds (physiology), Species Specificity (MeSH), Spores, Fungal (physiology), Zea mays (microbiology), Zea mays (physiology).
- MESH :
- metabolism : Glomeromycota, Mycorrhizae.
- methods : Agriculture.
- microbiology : Plants, Zea mays.
- physiology : Plant Roots, Plant Weeds, Seeds, Spores, Fungal, Zea mays.
- Biomass, Plant Development, Plant Physiological Phenomena, Species Specificity.
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) are known for their beneficial effects on plants. However, there is increasing evidence that some ruderal plants, including several agricultural weeds, respond negatively to AMF colonization. Here, we investigated the effect of AMF on the growth of individual weed species and on weed-crop interactions.
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS
First, under controlled glasshouse conditions, we screened growth responses of nine weed species and three crops to a widespread AMF, Glomus intraradices. None of the weeds screened showed a significant positive mycorrhizal growth response and four weed species were significantly reduced by the AMF (growth responses between -22 and -35%). In a subsequent experiment, we selected three of the negatively responding weed species--Echinochloa crus-galli, Setaria viridis and Solanum nigrum--and analyzed their responses to a combination of three AMF (Glomus intraradices, Glomus mosseae and Glomus claroideum). Finally, we tested whether the presence of a crop (maize) enhanced the suppressive effect of AMF on weeds. We found that the growth of the three selected weed species was also reduced by a combination of AMF and that the presence of maize amplified the negative effect of AMF on the growth of E. crus-galli.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE
Our results show that AMF can negatively influence the growth of some weed species indicating that AMF have the potential to act as determinants of weed community structure. Furthermore, mycorrhizal weed growth reductions can be amplified in the presence of a crop. Previous studies have shown that AMF provide a number of beneficial ecosystem services. Taken together with our current results, the maintenance and promotion of AMF activity may thereby contribute to sustainable management of agroecosystems. However, in order to further the practical and ecological relevance of our findings, additional experiments should be performed under field conditions.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027825
PubMed: 22164216
PubMed Central: PMC3229497
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:22164216Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Can arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi reduce the growth of agricultural weeds?</title>
<author><name sortKey="Veiga, Rita S L" sort="Veiga, Rita S L" uniqKey="Veiga R" first="Rita S L" last="Veiga">Rita S L. Veiga</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Ecological Farming Systems, Agroscope Reckenholz-Tänikon Research Station ART, Zürich, Switzerland. rita.lopesdeveiga@art.admin.ch</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Jansa, Jan" sort="Jansa, Jan" uniqKey="Jansa J" first="Jan" last="Jansa">Jan Jansa</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Frossard, Emmanuel" sort="Frossard, Emmanuel" uniqKey="Frossard E" first="Emmanuel" last="Frossard">Emmanuel Frossard</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Van Der Heijden, Marcel G A" sort="Van Der Heijden, Marcel G A" uniqKey="Van Der Heijden M" first="Marcel G A" last="Van Der Heijden">Marcel G A. Van Der Heijden</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2011">2011</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:22164216</idno>
<idno type="pmid">22164216</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0027825</idno>
<idno type="pmc">PMC3229497</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">002123</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">002123</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Can arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi reduce the growth of agricultural weeds?</title>
<author><name sortKey="Veiga, Rita S L" sort="Veiga, Rita S L" uniqKey="Veiga R" first="Rita S L" last="Veiga">Rita S L. Veiga</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Ecological Farming Systems, Agroscope Reckenholz-Tänikon Research Station ART, Zürich, Switzerland. rita.lopesdeveiga@art.admin.ch</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Jansa, Jan" sort="Jansa, Jan" uniqKey="Jansa J" first="Jan" last="Jansa">Jan Jansa</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Frossard, Emmanuel" sort="Frossard, Emmanuel" uniqKey="Frossard E" first="Emmanuel" last="Frossard">Emmanuel Frossard</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Van Der Heijden, Marcel G A" sort="Van Der Heijden, Marcel G A" uniqKey="Van Der Heijden M" first="Marcel G A" last="Van Der Heijden">Marcel G A. Van Der Heijden</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j">PloS one</title>
<idno type="eISSN">1932-6203</idno>
<imprint><date when="2011" type="published">2011</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Agriculture (methods)</term>
<term>Biomass (MeSH)</term>
<term>Glomeromycota (metabolism)</term>
<term>Mycorrhizae (metabolism)</term>
<term>Plant Development (MeSH)</term>
<term>Plant Physiological Phenomena (MeSH)</term>
<term>Plant Roots (physiology)</term>
<term>Plant Weeds (physiology)</term>
<term>Plants (microbiology)</term>
<term>Seeds (physiology)</term>
<term>Species Specificity (MeSH)</term>
<term>Spores, Fungal (physiology)</term>
<term>Zea mays (microbiology)</term>
<term>Zea mays (physiology)</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="metabolism" xml:lang="en"><term>Glomeromycota</term>
<term>Mycorrhizae</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Agriculture</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="microbiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Plants</term>
<term>Zea mays</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Plant Roots</term>
<term>Plant Weeds</term>
<term>Seeds</term>
<term>Spores, Fungal</term>
<term>Zea mays</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Biomass</term>
<term>Plant Development</term>
<term>Plant Physiological Phenomena</term>
<term>Species Specificity</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>BACKGROUND</b>
</p>
<p>Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) are known for their beneficial effects on plants. However, there is increasing evidence that some ruderal plants, including several agricultural weeds, respond negatively to AMF colonization. Here, we investigated the effect of AMF on the growth of individual weed species and on weed-crop interactions.</p>
</div>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS</b>
</p>
<p>First, under controlled glasshouse conditions, we screened growth responses of nine weed species and three crops to a widespread AMF, Glomus intraradices. None of the weeds screened showed a significant positive mycorrhizal growth response and four weed species were significantly reduced by the AMF (growth responses between -22 and -35%). In a subsequent experiment, we selected three of the negatively responding weed species--Echinochloa crus-galli, Setaria viridis and Solanum nigrum--and analyzed their responses to a combination of three AMF (Glomus intraradices, Glomus mosseae and Glomus claroideum). Finally, we tested whether the presence of a crop (maize) enhanced the suppressive effect of AMF on weeds. We found that the growth of the three selected weed species was also reduced by a combination of AMF and that the presence of maize amplified the negative effect of AMF on the growth of E. crus-galli.</p>
</div>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE</b>
</p>
<p>Our results show that AMF can negatively influence the growth of some weed species indicating that AMF have the potential to act as determinants of weed community structure. Furthermore, mycorrhizal weed growth reductions can be amplified in the presence of a crop. Previous studies have shown that AMF provide a number of beneficial ecosystem services. Taken together with our current results, the maintenance and promotion of AMF activity may thereby contribute to sustainable management of agroecosystems. However, in order to further the practical and ecological relevance of our findings, additional experiments should be performed under field conditions.</p>
</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">22164216</PMID>
<DateCompleted><Year>2012</Year>
<Month>07</Month>
<Day>20</Day>
</DateCompleted>
<DateRevised><Year>2018</Year>
<Month>11</Month>
<Day>13</Day>
</DateRevised>
<Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1932-6203</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>6</Volume>
<Issue>12</Issue>
<PubDate><Year>2011</Year>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>PloS one</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>PLoS One</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Can arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi reduce the growth of agricultural weeds?</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination><MedlinePgn>e27825</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1371/journal.pone.0027825</ELocationID>
<Abstract><AbstractText Label="BACKGROUND" NlmCategory="BACKGROUND">Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) are known for their beneficial effects on plants. However, there is increasing evidence that some ruderal plants, including several agricultural weeds, respond negatively to AMF colonization. Here, we investigated the effect of AMF on the growth of individual weed species and on weed-crop interactions.</AbstractText>
<AbstractText Label="METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">First, under controlled glasshouse conditions, we screened growth responses of nine weed species and three crops to a widespread AMF, Glomus intraradices. None of the weeds screened showed a significant positive mycorrhizal growth response and four weed species were significantly reduced by the AMF (growth responses between -22 and -35%). In a subsequent experiment, we selected three of the negatively responding weed species--Echinochloa crus-galli, Setaria viridis and Solanum nigrum--and analyzed their responses to a combination of three AMF (Glomus intraradices, Glomus mosseae and Glomus claroideum). Finally, we tested whether the presence of a crop (maize) enhanced the suppressive effect of AMF on weeds. We found that the growth of the three selected weed species was also reduced by a combination of AMF and that the presence of maize amplified the negative effect of AMF on the growth of E. crus-galli.</AbstractText>
<AbstractText Label="CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">Our results show that AMF can negatively influence the growth of some weed species indicating that AMF have the potential to act as determinants of weed community structure. Furthermore, mycorrhizal weed growth reductions can be amplified in the presence of a crop. Previous studies have shown that AMF provide a number of beneficial ecosystem services. Taken together with our current results, the maintenance and promotion of AMF activity may thereby contribute to sustainable management of agroecosystems. However, in order to further the practical and ecological relevance of our findings, additional experiments should be performed under field conditions.</AbstractText>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Veiga</LastName>
<ForeName>Rita S L</ForeName>
<Initials>RS</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Ecological Farming Systems, Agroscope Reckenholz-Tänikon Research Station ART, Zürich, Switzerland. rita.lopesdeveiga@art.admin.ch</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Jansa</LastName>
<ForeName>Jan</ForeName>
<Initials>J</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Frossard</LastName>
<ForeName>Emmanuel</ForeName>
<Initials>E</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>van der Heijden</LastName>
<ForeName>Marcel G A</ForeName>
<Initials>MG</Initials>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>eng</Language>
<PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
<ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2011</Year>
<Month>12</Month>
<Day>02</Day>
</ArticleDate>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country>
<MedlineTA>PLoS One</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>101285081</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>1932-6203</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
<CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset>
<MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000383" MajorTopicYN="N">Agriculture</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="N">methods</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D018533" MajorTopicYN="N">Biomass</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D055137" MajorTopicYN="N">Glomeromycota</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000378" MajorTopicYN="N">metabolism</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D038821" MajorTopicYN="N">Mycorrhizae</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000378" MajorTopicYN="Y">metabolism</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D063245" MajorTopicYN="N">Plant Development</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D018521" MajorTopicYN="N">Plant Physiological Phenomena</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D018517" MajorTopicYN="N">Plant Roots</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="N">physiology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D057685" MajorTopicYN="N">Plant Weeds</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="N">physiology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010944" MajorTopicYN="N">Plants</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000382" MajorTopicYN="Y">microbiology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012639" MajorTopicYN="N">Seeds</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="N">physiology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013045" MajorTopicYN="N">Species Specificity</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013172" MajorTopicYN="N">Spores, Fungal</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="N">physiology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003313" MajorTopicYN="N">Zea mays</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000382" MajorTopicYN="N">microbiology</QualifierName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="N">physiology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
</MeshHeadingList>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2011</Year>
<Month>06</Month>
<Day>16</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2011</Year>
<Month>10</Month>
<Day>26</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2011</Year>
<Month>12</Month>
<Day>14</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2011</Year>
<Month>12</Month>
<Day>14</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2012</Year>
<Month>7</Month>
<Day>21</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22164216</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0027825</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pii">PONE-D-11-10917</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC3229497</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
<ReferenceList><Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2006;172(4):739-52</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17096799</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Science. 2007 Jun 22;316(5832):1746-8</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17588930</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Mycorrhiza. 2002 Oct;12(5):225-34</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12375133</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003 May;69(5):2816-24</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12732553</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Oecologia. 2004 Mar;138(4):574-83</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">14714172</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2006;172(3):536-43</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17083683</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Ecology. 2011 Jun;92(6):1303-13</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21797158</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2008;177(3):779-89</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18042204</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2008;178(4):852-62</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18346106</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2008;180(1):162-75</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18643939</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2009;182(2):495-506</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19338635</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Mycorrhiza. 2010 Nov;20(8):519-30</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20697748</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2009 Mar;181(4):938-49</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19140934</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2006;172(3):554-62</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17083685</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
</ReferenceList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Bois/explor/MycorrhizaeV1/Data/Main/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002123 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 002123 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Bois |area= MycorrhizaeV1 |flux= Main |étape= Corpus |type= RBID |clé= pubmed:22164216 |texte= Can arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi reduce the growth of agricultural weeds? }}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:22164216" \ | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd \ | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a MycorrhizaeV1
![]() | This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.37. | ![]() |