Diversity effects on productivity are stronger within than between trophic groups in the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis.
Identifieur interne : 001F64 ( Main/Corpus ); précédent : 001F63; suivant : 001F65Diversity effects on productivity are stronger within than between trophic groups in the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis.
Auteurs : Alexander M. Koch ; Pedro M. Antunes ; John N. KlironomosSource :
- PloS one [ 1932-6203 ] ; 2012.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- genetics : Mycorrhizae, Plant Roots, Plants, Symbiosis.
- Ecosystem, Phylogeny, Soil Microbiology.
Abstract
BACKGROUND
The diversity of plants and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) has been experimentally shown to alter plant and AMF productivity. However, little is known about how plant and AMF diversity interact to shape their respective productivity.
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS
We co-manipulated the diversity of both AMF and plant communities in two greenhouse studies to determine whether the productivity of each trophic group is mainly influenced by plant or AMF diversity, respectively, and whether there is any interaction between plant and fungal diversity. In both experiments we compared the productivity of three different plant species monocultures, or their respective 3-species mixtures. Similarly, in both studies these plant treatments were crossed with an AMF diversity gradient that ranged from zero (non-mycorrhizal controls) to a maximum of three and five taxonomically distinct AMF taxa, respectively. We found that within both trophic groups productivity was significantly influenced by taxon identity, and increased with taxon richness. These main effects of AMF and plant diversity on their respective productivities did not depend on each other, even though we detected significant individual taxon effects across trophic groups.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE
Our results indicate that similar ecological processes regulate diversity-productivity relationships within trophic groups. However, productivity-diversity relationships are not necessarily correlated across interacting trophic levels, leading to asymmetries and possible biotic feedbacks. Thus, biotic interactions within and across trophic groups should be considered in predictive models of community assembly.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036950
PubMed: 22629347
PubMed Central: PMC3357441
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:22629347Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Diversity effects on productivity are stronger within than between trophic groups in the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Koch, Alexander M" sort="Koch, Alexander M" uniqKey="Koch A" first="Alexander M" last="Koch">Alexander M. Koch</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada. akoch13@gmail.com</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Antunes, Pedro M" sort="Antunes, Pedro M" uniqKey="Antunes P" first="Pedro M" last="Antunes">Pedro M. Antunes</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Klironomos, John N" sort="Klironomos, John N" uniqKey="Klironomos J" first="John N" last="Klironomos">John N. Klironomos</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2012">2012</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:22629347</idno>
<idno type="pmid">22629347</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0036950</idno>
<idno type="pmc">PMC3357441</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">001F64</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">001F64</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Diversity effects on productivity are stronger within than between trophic groups in the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Koch, Alexander M" sort="Koch, Alexander M" uniqKey="Koch A" first="Alexander M" last="Koch">Alexander M. Koch</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada. akoch13@gmail.com</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Antunes, Pedro M" sort="Antunes, Pedro M" uniqKey="Antunes P" first="Pedro M" last="Antunes">Pedro M. Antunes</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Klironomos, John N" sort="Klironomos, John N" uniqKey="Klironomos J" first="John N" last="Klironomos">John N. Klironomos</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j">PloS one</title>
<idno type="eISSN">1932-6203</idno>
<imprint><date when="2012" type="published">2012</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Ecosystem (MeSH)</term>
<term>Mycorrhizae (genetics)</term>
<term>Phylogeny (MeSH)</term>
<term>Plant Roots (genetics)</term>
<term>Plants (genetics)</term>
<term>Soil Microbiology (MeSH)</term>
<term>Symbiosis (genetics)</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="genetics" xml:lang="en"><term>Mycorrhizae</term>
<term>Plant Roots</term>
<term>Plants</term>
<term>Symbiosis</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Ecosystem</term>
<term>Phylogeny</term>
<term>Soil Microbiology</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>BACKGROUND</b>
</p>
<p>The diversity of plants and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) has been experimentally shown to alter plant and AMF productivity. However, little is known about how plant and AMF diversity interact to shape their respective productivity.</p>
</div>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS</b>
</p>
<p>We co-manipulated the diversity of both AMF and plant communities in two greenhouse studies to determine whether the productivity of each trophic group is mainly influenced by plant or AMF diversity, respectively, and whether there is any interaction between plant and fungal diversity. In both experiments we compared the productivity of three different plant species monocultures, or their respective 3-species mixtures. Similarly, in both studies these plant treatments were crossed with an AMF diversity gradient that ranged from zero (non-mycorrhizal controls) to a maximum of three and five taxonomically distinct AMF taxa, respectively. We found that within both trophic groups productivity was significantly influenced by taxon identity, and increased with taxon richness. These main effects of AMF and plant diversity on their respective productivities did not depend on each other, even though we detected significant individual taxon effects across trophic groups.</p>
</div>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE</b>
</p>
<p>Our results indicate that similar ecological processes regulate diversity-productivity relationships within trophic groups. However, productivity-diversity relationships are not necessarily correlated across interacting trophic levels, leading to asymmetries and possible biotic feedbacks. Thus, biotic interactions within and across trophic groups should be considered in predictive models of community assembly.</p>
</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">22629347</PMID>
<DateCompleted><Year>2012</Year>
<Month>12</Month>
<Day>17</Day>
</DateCompleted>
<DateRevised><Year>2020</Year>
<Month>03</Month>
<Day>05</Day>
</DateRevised>
<Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1932-6203</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>7</Volume>
<Issue>5</Issue>
<PubDate><Year>2012</Year>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>PloS one</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>PLoS One</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Diversity effects on productivity are stronger within than between trophic groups in the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis.</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination><MedlinePgn>e36950</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1371/journal.pone.0036950</ELocationID>
<Abstract><AbstractText Label="BACKGROUND" NlmCategory="BACKGROUND">The diversity of plants and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) has been experimentally shown to alter plant and AMF productivity. However, little is known about how plant and AMF diversity interact to shape their respective productivity.</AbstractText>
<AbstractText Label="METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">We co-manipulated the diversity of both AMF and plant communities in two greenhouse studies to determine whether the productivity of each trophic group is mainly influenced by plant or AMF diversity, respectively, and whether there is any interaction between plant and fungal diversity. In both experiments we compared the productivity of three different plant species monocultures, or their respective 3-species mixtures. Similarly, in both studies these plant treatments were crossed with an AMF diversity gradient that ranged from zero (non-mycorrhizal controls) to a maximum of three and five taxonomically distinct AMF taxa, respectively. We found that within both trophic groups productivity was significantly influenced by taxon identity, and increased with taxon richness. These main effects of AMF and plant diversity on their respective productivities did not depend on each other, even though we detected significant individual taxon effects across trophic groups.</AbstractText>
<AbstractText Label="CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">Our results indicate that similar ecological processes regulate diversity-productivity relationships within trophic groups. However, productivity-diversity relationships are not necessarily correlated across interacting trophic levels, leading to asymmetries and possible biotic feedbacks. Thus, biotic interactions within and across trophic groups should be considered in predictive models of community assembly.</AbstractText>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Koch</LastName>
<ForeName>Alexander M</ForeName>
<Initials>AM</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada. akoch13@gmail.com</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Antunes</LastName>
<ForeName>Pedro M</ForeName>
<Initials>PM</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Klironomos</LastName>
<ForeName>John N</ForeName>
<Initials>JN</Initials>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>eng</Language>
<PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
<ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2012</Year>
<Month>05</Month>
<Day>21</Day>
</ArticleDate>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country>
<MedlineTA>PLoS One</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>101285081</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>1932-6203</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
<CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset>
<MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017753" MajorTopicYN="N">Ecosystem</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D038821" MajorTopicYN="N">Mycorrhizae</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000235" MajorTopicYN="Y">genetics</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010802" MajorTopicYN="Y">Phylogeny</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D018517" MajorTopicYN="N">Plant Roots</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000235" MajorTopicYN="Y">genetics</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010944" MajorTopicYN="N">Plants</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000235" MajorTopicYN="N">genetics</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012988" MajorTopicYN="N">Soil Microbiology</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013559" MajorTopicYN="N">Symbiosis</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000235" MajorTopicYN="Y">genetics</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
</MeshHeadingList>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2011</Year>
<Month>07</Month>
<Day>14</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2012</Year>
<Month>04</Month>
<Day>15</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2012</Year>
<Month>5</Month>
<Day>26</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2012</Year>
<Month>5</Month>
<Day>26</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2012</Year>
<Month>12</Month>
<Day>18</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22629347</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0036950</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pii">PONE-D-11-13544</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC3357441</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
<ReferenceList><Reference><Citation>Ecol Lett. 2007 Aug;10(8):680-9</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17594423</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Ecol Lett. 2011 Oct;14(10):1001-9</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21790936</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Nov 4;105(44):17012-7</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18971334</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Feb 24;101(8):2369-74</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">14983016</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>J Exp Bot. 2009;60(9):2465-80</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19429838</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010 Jun;76(12):3765-75</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20418424</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Trends Ecol Evol. 1994 Oct;9(10):393-8</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21236900</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Biol Lett. 2011 Feb 23;7(1):75-8</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20685699</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2006;172(3):554-62</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17083685</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Ecol Lett. 2006 Feb;9(2):103-10</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16958874</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Nature. 2010 Aug 5;466(7307):752-5</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20581819</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Mycorrhiza. 2006 Jul;16(5):299-363</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16845554</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2011 Jan;189(2):507-14</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20880038</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Trends Microbiol. 2002 Oct;10(10):474-81</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12377558</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Nature. 2002 May 2;417(6884):67-70</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11986666</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Ecology. 2011 Jun;92(6):1303-13</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21797158</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2010 Jul;187(2):286-300</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20524992</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2009;183(4):1176-87</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19496945</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Nature. 2001 Jul 5;412(6842):72-6</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11452308</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2011 Jan;189(2):366-70</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21058952</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Nature. 2007 Jul 12;448(7150):188-90</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17625564</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Mycorrhiza. 2002 Aug;12(4):181-4</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12189472</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Oecologia. 1997 May;110(4):449-460</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28307235</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Science. 2010 Aug 13;329(5993):853-6</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20705861</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Ecol Lett. 2008 Mar;11(3):296-310</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18047587</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2009;183(4):1188-200</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19496954</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Science. 2007 Jun 22;316(5832):1746-8</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17588930</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2008;177(3):779-89</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18042204</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Annu Rev Genet. 2010;44:271-92</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20822441</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Ecol Lett. 2011 Jan;14(1):36-41</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21073641</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Trends Ecol Evol. 2010 Aug;25(8):468-78</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20557974</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
</ReferenceList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Bois/explor/MycorrhizaeV1/Data/Main/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001F64 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001F64 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Bois |area= MycorrhizaeV1 |flux= Main |étape= Corpus |type= RBID |clé= pubmed:22629347 |texte= Diversity effects on productivity are stronger within than between trophic groups in the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. }}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:22629347" \ | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd \ | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a MycorrhizaeV1
![]() | This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.37. | ![]() |