MycorrhizaeV1, Main, Corpus, bibRecord, 001B37

Influence of arbuscular mycorrhiza on growth and reproductive response of plants under water deficit: a meta-analysis.

Identifieur interne : 001B37 ( Main/Corpus ); précédent : 001B36; suivant : 001B38

Influence of arbuscular mycorrhiza on growth and reproductive response of plants under water deficit: a meta-analysis.

Auteurs : Benjamin Jayne ; Martin Quigley

Source :

Mycorrhiza [ 1432-1890 ] ; 2014.

RBID : pubmed:23917611

English descriptors

KwdEn :
- Desiccation (MeSH), Mycorrhizae (physiology), Plant Development (MeSH), Plant Physiological Phenomena (MeSH), Plants (microbiology), Reproduction (MeSH), Stress, Physiological (MeSH), Symbiosis (MeSH).
MESH :
- microbiology : Plants.
- physiology : Mycorrhizae.
- Desiccation, Plant Development, Plant Physiological Phenomena, Reproduction, Stress, Physiological, Symbiosis.

Abstract

Despite a large body of literature that describes the effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization on plant response to water deficit, reviews of these works have been mainly in narrative form, and it is therefore difficult to quantify the magnitude of the effect. We performed a meta-analysis to examine the effect of mycorrhizal colonization on growth and yield of plants exposed to water deficit stress. Data were compared in the context of annual vs. perennial plants, herbaceous vs. woody plants, field vs. greenhouse conditions, degree of stress, functional group, regions of plant growth, and mycorrhizal and host species. We found that, in terms of biomass measurements, mycorrhizal plants have better growth and reproductive response under water stress compared to non-mycorrhizal plants. When variables such as habit, life cycle, or water stress level are considered, differences in mycorrhizal effect on plant growth between variables are observed. While growth of both annual and perennial plants is improved by symbiosis, perennials respond more favorably to colonization than annuals. Overall, our meta-analysis reveals a quantifiable corroboration of the commonly held view that, under water-deficit conditions, plants colonized by mycorrhizal fungi have better growth and reproductive response than those that are not.

DOI: 10.1007/s00572-013-0515-x
PubMed: 23917611

Links to Exploration step

pubmed:23917611

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Influence of arbuscular mycorrhiza on growth and reproductive response of plants under water deficit: a meta-analysis.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Jayne, Benjamin" sort="Jayne, Benjamin" uniqKey="Jayne B" first="Benjamin" last="Jayne">Benjamin Jayne</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>University of Denver, Denver, CO, USA, benjamin.s.jayne@gmail.com.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Quigley, Martin" sort="Quigley, Martin" uniqKey="Quigley M" first="Martin" last="Quigley">Martin Quigley</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2014">2014</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:23917611</idno>
<idno type="pmid">23917611</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.1007/s00572-013-0515-x</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">001B37</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">001B37</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Influence of arbuscular mycorrhiza on growth and reproductive response of plants under water deficit: a meta-analysis.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Jayne, Benjamin" sort="Jayne, Benjamin" uniqKey="Jayne B" first="Benjamin" last="Jayne">Benjamin Jayne</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>University of Denver, Denver, CO, USA, benjamin.s.jayne@gmail.com.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Quigley, Martin" sort="Quigley, Martin" uniqKey="Quigley M" first="Martin" last="Quigley">Martin Quigley</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j">Mycorrhiza</title>
<idno type="eISSN">1432-1890</idno>
<imprint><date when="2014" type="published">2014</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Desiccation (MeSH)</term>
<term>Mycorrhizae (physiology)</term>
<term>Plant Development (MeSH)</term>
<term>Plant Physiological Phenomena (MeSH)</term>
<term>Plants (microbiology)</term>
<term>Reproduction (MeSH)</term>
<term>Stress, Physiological (MeSH)</term>
<term>Symbiosis (MeSH)</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="microbiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Plants</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Mycorrhizae</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Desiccation</term>
<term>Plant Development</term>
<term>Plant Physiological Phenomena</term>
<term>Reproduction</term>
<term>Stress, Physiological</term>
<term>Symbiosis</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Despite a large body of literature that describes the effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization on plant response to water deficit, reviews of these works have been mainly in narrative form, and it is therefore difficult to quantify the magnitude of the effect. We performed a meta-analysis to examine the effect of mycorrhizal colonization on growth and yield of plants exposed to water deficit stress. Data were compared in the context of annual vs. perennial plants, herbaceous vs. woody plants, field vs. greenhouse conditions, degree of stress, functional group, regions of plant growth, and mycorrhizal and host species. We found that, in terms of biomass measurements, mycorrhizal plants have better growth and reproductive response under water stress compared to non-mycorrhizal plants. When variables such as habit, life cycle, or water stress level are considered, differences in mycorrhizal effect on plant growth between variables are observed. While growth of both annual and perennial plants is improved by symbiosis, perennials respond more favorably to colonization than annuals. Overall, our meta-analysis reveals a quantifiable corroboration of the commonly held view that, under water-deficit conditions, plants colonized by mycorrhizal fungi have better growth and reproductive response than those that are not. </div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">23917611</PMID>
<DateCompleted><Year>2014</Year>
<Month>09</Month>
<Day>15</Day>
</DateCompleted>
<DateRevised><Year>2018</Year>
<Month>11</Month>
<Day>13</Day>
</DateRevised>
<Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1432-1890</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>24</Volume>
<Issue>2</Issue>
<PubDate><Year>2014</Year>
<Month>Feb</Month>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>Mycorrhiza</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>Mycorrhiza</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Influence of arbuscular mycorrhiza on growth and reproductive response of plants under water deficit: a meta-analysis.</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination><MedlinePgn>109-19</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1007/s00572-013-0515-x</ELocationID>
<Abstract><AbstractText>Despite a large body of literature that describes the effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization on plant response to water deficit, reviews of these works have been mainly in narrative form, and it is therefore difficult to quantify the magnitude of the effect. We performed a meta-analysis to examine the effect of mycorrhizal colonization on growth and yield of plants exposed to water deficit stress. Data were compared in the context of annual vs. perennial plants, herbaceous vs. woody plants, field vs. greenhouse conditions, degree of stress, functional group, regions of plant growth, and mycorrhizal and host species. We found that, in terms of biomass measurements, mycorrhizal plants have better growth and reproductive response under water stress compared to non-mycorrhizal plants. When variables such as habit, life cycle, or water stress level are considered, differences in mycorrhizal effect on plant growth between variables are observed. While growth of both annual and perennial plants is improved by symbiosis, perennials respond more favorably to colonization than annuals. Overall, our meta-analysis reveals a quantifiable corroboration of the commonly held view that, under water-deficit conditions, plants colonized by mycorrhizal fungi have better growth and reproductive response than those that are not. </AbstractText>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Jayne</LastName>
<ForeName>Benjamin</ForeName>
<Initials>B</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>University of Denver, Denver, CO, USA, benjamin.s.jayne@gmail.com.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Quigley</LastName>
<ForeName>Martin</ForeName>
<Initials>M</Initials>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>eng</Language>
<PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D017418">Meta-Analysis</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
<ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2013</Year>
<Month>08</Month>
<Day>06</Day>
</ArticleDate>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Germany</Country>
<MedlineTA>Mycorrhiza</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>100955036</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>0940-6360</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
<CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset>
<MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003890" MajorTopicYN="Y">Desiccation</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D038821" MajorTopicYN="N">Mycorrhizae</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="Y">physiology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D063245" MajorTopicYN="Y">Plant Development</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D018521" MajorTopicYN="N">Plant Physiological Phenomena</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010944" MajorTopicYN="N">Plants</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000382" MajorTopicYN="Y">microbiology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012098" MajorTopicYN="Y">Reproduction</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013312" MajorTopicYN="Y">Stress, Physiological</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013559" MajorTopicYN="Y">Symbiosis</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
</MeshHeadingList>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2013</Year>
<Month>02</Month>
<Day>03</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2013</Year>
<Month>06</Month>
<Day>30</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2013</Year>
<Month>8</Month>
<Day>7</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2013</Year>
<Month>8</Month>
<Day>7</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2014</Year>
<Month>9</Month>
<Day>16</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">23917611</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1007/s00572-013-0515-x</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
<ReferenceList><Reference><Citation>Mycorrhiza. 2004 Aug;14(4):263-9</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12942358</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Oecologia. 2009 May;160(2):267-77</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19219458</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>J Plant Physiol. 2004 Jun;161(6):675-82</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15266714</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2006 Aug;9(4):358-63</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16713330</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>J Plant Physiol. 2005 Jan;162(1):27-35</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15700418</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995 Feb;61(2):456-60</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16534929</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Mycorrhiza. 2005 May;15(3):159-65</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15883853</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Mycorrhiza. 2006 Jun;16(4):261-7</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16741758</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>J Plant Physiol. 2006 Mar;163(4):417-25</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16455355</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Oecologia. 1994 Sep;99(1-2):21-26</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28313944</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>J Exp Bot. 2004 Aug;55(403):1743-50</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15208335</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Ecol Lett. 2010 Mar;13(3):394-407</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20100237</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Saudi J Biol Sci. 2011 Jan;18(1):93-8</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">23961109</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Ecology. 2009 Aug;90(8):2088-97</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19739371</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Ecology. 2007 Apr;88(4):1021-9</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17536717</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2005 Nov;7(6):706-12</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16388474</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Microb Ecol. 2009 Nov;58(4):942-51</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19495853</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Science. 1982 Sep 3;217(4563):941-3</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17747956</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Tree Physiol. 1996 Nov-Dec;16(11_12):985-993</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">14871792</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>J Plant Physiol. 2010 May 15;167(8):614-9</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20044167</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Plant J. 2007 May;50(3):529-44</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17419842</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>J Plant Physiol. 2006 Nov;163(11):1101-10</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17032615</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2005 Oct;168(1):189-204</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16159333</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
</ReferenceList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Bois/explor/MycorrhizaeV1/Data/Main/Corpus

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001B37 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001B37 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Bois
   |area=    MycorrhizaeV1
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     pubmed:23917611
   |texte=   Influence of arbuscular mycorrhiza on growth and reproductive response of plants under water deficit: a meta-analysis.
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:23917611" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a MycorrhizaeV1

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.37.
Data generation: Wed Nov 18 15:34:48 2020. Site generation: Wed Nov 18 15:41:10 2020

	Serveur d'exploration sur la mycorhize
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur la mycorhize

Influence of arbuscular mycorrhiza on growth and reproductive response of plants under water deficit: a meta-analysis.

Influence of arbuscular mycorrhiza on growth and reproductive response of plants under water deficit: a meta-analysis.

Source :

English descriptors

Abstract

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

Pour générer des pages wiki