Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal networks vary throughout the growing season and between successional stages.
Identifieur interne : 001A12 ( Main/Corpus ); précédent : 001A11; suivant : 001A13Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal networks vary throughout the growing season and between successional stages.
Auteurs : Alison Elizabeth Bennett ; Tim John Daniell ; Maarja Öpik ; John Davison ; Mari Moora ; Martin Zobel ; Marc-André Selosse ; Darren EvansSource :
- PloS one [ 1932-6203 ] ; 2013.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- growth & development : Mycorrhizae, Trees.
- microbiology : Plants, Trees.
- Ecosystem, Extinction, Biological, Plant Development, Seasons, Symbiosis.
Abstract
To date, few analyses of mutualistic networks have investigated successional or seasonal dynamics. Combining interaction data from multiple time points likely creates an inaccurate picture of the structure of networks (because these networks are aggregated across time), which may negatively influence their application in ecosystem assessments and conservation. Using a replicated bipartite mutualistic network of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungal-plant associations, detected using large sample numbers of plants and AM fungi identified through molecular techniques, we test whether the properties of the network are temporally dynamic either between different successional stages or within the growing season. These questions have never been directly tested in the AM fungal-plant mutualism or the vast majority of other mutualisms. We demonstrate the following results: First, our examination of two different successional stages (young and old forest) demonstrated that succession increases the proportion of specialists within the community and decreases the number of interactions. Second, AM fungal-plant mutualism structure changed throughout the growing season as the number of links between partners increased. Third, we observed shifts in associations between AM fungal and plant species throughout the growing season, potentially reflecting changes in biotic and abiotic conditions. Thus, this analysis opens up two entirely new areas of research: 1) identifying what influences changes in plant-AM fungal associations in these networks, and 2) what aspects of temporal variation and succession are of general importance in structuring bipartite networks and plant-AM fungal communities.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083241
PubMed: 24358265
PubMed Central: PMC3866191
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:24358265Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal networks vary throughout the growing season and between successional stages.</title><author><name sortKey="Bennett, Alison Elizabeth" sort="Bennett, Alison Elizabeth" uniqKey="Bennett A" first="Alison Elizabeth" last="Bennett">Alison Elizabeth Bennett</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Ecological Sciences, The James Hutton Institute, Dundee United Kingdom.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Daniell, Tim John" sort="Daniell, Tim John" uniqKey="Daniell T" first="Tim John" last="Daniell">Tim John Daniell</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Ecological Sciences, The James Hutton Institute, Dundee United Kingdom.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Opik, Maarja" sort="Opik, Maarja" uniqKey="Opik M" first="Maarja" last="Öpik">Maarja Öpik</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Botany, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Davison, John" sort="Davison, John" uniqKey="Davison J" first="John" last="Davison">John Davison</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Botany, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Moora, Mari" sort="Moora, Mari" uniqKey="Moora M" first="Mari" last="Moora">Mari Moora</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Botany, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Zobel, Martin" sort="Zobel, Martin" uniqKey="Zobel M" first="Martin" last="Zobel">Martin Zobel</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Botany, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Selosse, Marc Andre" sort="Selosse, Marc Andre" uniqKey="Selosse M" first="Marc-André" last="Selosse">Marc-André Selosse</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle (Département Systématique et Evolution), Paris, France.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Evans, Darren" sort="Evans, Darren" uniqKey="Evans D" first="Darren" last="Evans">Darren Evans</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>School of Biological, Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, University of Hull, Kingston upon Hull, United Kingdom.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2013">2013</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:24358265</idno><idno type="pmid">24358265</idno><idno type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0083241</idno><idno type="pmc">PMC3866191</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">001A12</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">001A12</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal networks vary throughout the growing season and between successional stages.</title><author><name sortKey="Bennett, Alison Elizabeth" sort="Bennett, Alison Elizabeth" uniqKey="Bennett A" first="Alison Elizabeth" last="Bennett">Alison Elizabeth Bennett</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Ecological Sciences, The James Hutton Institute, Dundee United Kingdom.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Daniell, Tim John" sort="Daniell, Tim John" uniqKey="Daniell T" first="Tim John" last="Daniell">Tim John Daniell</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Ecological Sciences, The James Hutton Institute, Dundee United Kingdom.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Opik, Maarja" sort="Opik, Maarja" uniqKey="Opik M" first="Maarja" last="Öpik">Maarja Öpik</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Botany, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Davison, John" sort="Davison, John" uniqKey="Davison J" first="John" last="Davison">John Davison</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Botany, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Moora, Mari" sort="Moora, Mari" uniqKey="Moora M" first="Mari" last="Moora">Mari Moora</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Botany, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Zobel, Martin" sort="Zobel, Martin" uniqKey="Zobel M" first="Martin" last="Zobel">Martin Zobel</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Botany, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Selosse, Marc Andre" sort="Selosse, Marc Andre" uniqKey="Selosse M" first="Marc-André" last="Selosse">Marc-André Selosse</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle (Département Systématique et Evolution), Paris, France.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Evans, Darren" sort="Evans, Darren" uniqKey="Evans D" first="Darren" last="Evans">Darren Evans</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>School of Biological, Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, University of Hull, Kingston upon Hull, United Kingdom.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">PloS one</title><idno type="eISSN">1932-6203</idno><imprint><date when="2013" type="published">2013</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Ecosystem (MeSH)</term><term>Extinction, Biological (MeSH)</term><term>Mycorrhizae (growth & development)</term><term>Plant Development (MeSH)</term><term>Plants (microbiology)</term><term>Seasons (MeSH)</term><term>Symbiosis (MeSH)</term><term>Trees (growth & development)</term><term>Trees (microbiology)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="growth & development" xml:lang="en"><term>Mycorrhizae</term><term>Trees</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="microbiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Plants</term><term>Trees</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Ecosystem</term><term>Extinction, Biological</term><term>Plant Development</term><term>Seasons</term><term>Symbiosis</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">To date, few analyses of mutualistic networks have investigated successional or seasonal dynamics. Combining interaction data from multiple time points likely creates an inaccurate picture of the structure of networks (because these networks are aggregated across time), which may negatively influence their application in ecosystem assessments and conservation. Using a replicated bipartite mutualistic network of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungal-plant associations, detected using large sample numbers of plants and AM fungi identified through molecular techniques, we test whether the properties of the network are temporally dynamic either between different successional stages or within the growing season. These questions have never been directly tested in the AM fungal-plant mutualism or the vast majority of other mutualisms. We demonstrate the following results: First, our examination of two different successional stages (young and old forest) demonstrated that succession increases the proportion of specialists within the community and decreases the number of interactions. Second, AM fungal-plant mutualism structure changed throughout the growing season as the number of links between partners increased. Third, we observed shifts in associations between AM fungal and plant species throughout the growing season, potentially reflecting changes in biotic and abiotic conditions. Thus, this analysis opens up two entirely new areas of research: 1) identifying what influences changes in plant-AM fungal associations in these networks, and 2) what aspects of temporal variation and succession are of general importance in structuring bipartite networks and plant-AM fungal communities. </div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">24358265</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2014</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>21</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2018</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>13</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Electronic-eCollection"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1932-6203</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>8</Volume><Issue>12</Issue><PubDate><Year>2013</Year></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>PloS one</Title><ISOAbbreviation>PLoS One</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal networks vary throughout the growing season and between successional stages.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>e83241</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1371/journal.pone.0083241</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>To date, few analyses of mutualistic networks have investigated successional or seasonal dynamics. Combining interaction data from multiple time points likely creates an inaccurate picture of the structure of networks (because these networks are aggregated across time), which may negatively influence their application in ecosystem assessments and conservation. Using a replicated bipartite mutualistic network of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungal-plant associations, detected using large sample numbers of plants and AM fungi identified through molecular techniques, we test whether the properties of the network are temporally dynamic either between different successional stages or within the growing season. These questions have never been directly tested in the AM fungal-plant mutualism or the vast majority of other mutualisms. We demonstrate the following results: First, our examination of two different successional stages (young and old forest) demonstrated that succession increases the proportion of specialists within the community and decreases the number of interactions. Second, AM fungal-plant mutualism structure changed throughout the growing season as the number of links between partners increased. Third, we observed shifts in associations between AM fungal and plant species throughout the growing season, potentially reflecting changes in biotic and abiotic conditions. Thus, this analysis opens up two entirely new areas of research: 1) identifying what influences changes in plant-AM fungal associations in these networks, and 2) what aspects of temporal variation and succession are of general importance in structuring bipartite networks and plant-AM fungal communities. </AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Bennett</LastName><ForeName>Alison Elizabeth</ForeName><Initials>AE</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Ecological Sciences, The James Hutton Institute, Dundee United Kingdom.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Daniell</LastName><ForeName>Tim John</ForeName><Initials>TJ</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Ecological Sciences, The James Hutton Institute, Dundee United Kingdom.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Öpik</LastName><ForeName>Maarja</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Botany, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Davison</LastName><ForeName>John</ForeName><Initials>J</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Botany, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Moora</LastName><ForeName>Mari</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Botany, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Zobel</LastName><ForeName>Martin</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Botany, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Selosse</LastName><ForeName>Marc-André</ForeName><Initials>MA</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle (Département Systématique et Evolution), Paris, France.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Evans</LastName><ForeName>Darren</ForeName><Initials>D</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>School of Biological, Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, University of Hull, Kingston upon Hull, United Kingdom.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2013</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>17</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>PLoS One</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>101285081</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1932-6203</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017753" MajorTopicYN="Y">Ecosystem</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D053476" MajorTopicYN="N">Extinction, Biological</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D038821" MajorTopicYN="N">Mycorrhizae</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000254" MajorTopicYN="Y">growth & development</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D063245" MajorTopicYN="Y">Plant Development</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010944" MajorTopicYN="N">Plants</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000382" MajorTopicYN="Y">microbiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012621" MajorTopicYN="Y">Seasons</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013559" MajorTopicYN="Y">Symbiosis</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014197" MajorTopicYN="N">Trees</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000254" MajorTopicYN="N">growth & development</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000382" MajorTopicYN="N">microbiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2013</Year><Month>05</Month><Day>08</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2013</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>01</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2013</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>21</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2013</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>21</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2014</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>22</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>epublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24358265</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0083241</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">PONE-D-13-18704</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC3866191</ArticleId></ArticleIdList><ReferenceList><Reference><Citation>J Exp Bot. 2004 Feb;55(396):525-34</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">14739273</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Dec 22;271(1557):2605-11</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15615687</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Biometrics. 1987 Dec;43(4):783-91</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">3427163</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2012 Apr;194(2):536-47</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22269207</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Trends Ecol Evol. 2006 Nov;21(11):621-8</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16843567</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2001 Jul;36(2-3):203-209</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11451525</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Trends Ecol Evol. 2010 Aug;25(8):468-78</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20557974</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2010 Nov;74(2):336-45</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20722732</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Ecology. 2008 Jun;89(6):1573-82</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18589522</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>ISME J. 2010 Sep;4(9):1081-3</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20613789</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e26455</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22125597</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2012 Apr;194(2):307-12</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22269121</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Nature. 2007 Jan 11;445(7124):202-5</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17215842</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>BMC Ecol. 2006;6:9</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16907983</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Ecology. 2009 Aug;90(8):2039-46</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19739366</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Oecologia. 2009 Mar;159(2):355-61</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18982354</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2009 Jan;67(1):81-92</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19120460</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Trends Ecol Evol. 1998 Jan 1;13(1):15-20</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21238179</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2011 Oct;78(1):103-15</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21457278</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>ISME J. 2010 Mar;4(3):337-45</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19924158</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Environ Entomol. 2009 Feb;38(1):93-102</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19791601</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2011 May;190(3):794-804</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21294738</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003 May;69(5):2816-24</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12732553</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2009 Oct;184(2):424-37</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19558424</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2000 Feb;75(1):65-93</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">10740893</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Ecology. 2010 Mar;91(3):793-801</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20426337</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>ISME J. 2012 Feb;6(2):330-42</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21881616</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Ecol Lett. 2011 Aug;14(8):773-81</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21699640</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Ambio. 2009 Sep;38(6):309-15</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19860154</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>PLoS One. 2008;3(3):e1740</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18320058</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Oct 1;99(20):12917-22</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12235364</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Bioinformatics. 2004 Jul 22;20(11):1806-7</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">14988107</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2010 Oct;188(1):223-41</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20561207</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e41938</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22879900</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2008;179(3):867-76</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18537886</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference></ReferenceList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Bois/explor/MycorrhizaeV1/Data/Main/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001A12 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001A12 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Bois
|area= MycorrhizaeV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:24358265
|texte= Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal networks vary throughout the growing season and between successional stages.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:24358265" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a MycorrhizaeV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.37. |  |