Comparative analysis of different methods for evaluating quality of Quercus ilex seedlings inoculated with Tuber melanosporum.
Identifieur interne : 001951 ( Main/Corpus ); précédent : 001950; suivant : 001952Comparative analysis of different methods for evaluating quality of Quercus ilex seedlings inoculated with Tuber melanosporum.
Auteurs : Antonio Andrés-Alpuente ; Sergio Sánchez ; María Martín ; Angel Javier Aguirre ; Juan J. BarriusoSource :
- Mycorrhiza [ 1432-1890 ] ; 2014.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- microbiology : Quercus, Seedlings.
- physiology : Ascomycota, Mycorrhizae.
- Agriculture.
Abstract
The quality of seedlings colonized by Tuber melanosporum is one of the main factors that contributes to the success or failure of a truffle crop. Truffle cultivation has quickly grown in European countries and elsewhere, so a commonly shared seedling evaluation method is needed. Five evaluation methods are currently published in the literature: three are used in Spain and two in France and Italy. Although all estimate the percentage colonization by T. melanosporum mycorrhizae, they do it in different ways. Two methods also estimate total number of mycorrhizae per seedling. Most are destructive. In this work, ten batches of holm oak seedlings inoculated with T. melanosporum from two different nurseries were evaluated by means of the five methods noted above. Some similarity was detected between the percentages of T. melanosporum mycorrhizae estimated by each method but not in their ability to assess the suitability of each batch. We discuss the advantages and disadvantages for each method and suggest approaches to reach consensus within the truffle culture industry for certifying mycorrhizal colonization by T. melanosporum and seedling quality.
DOI: 10.1007/s00572-014-0563-x
PubMed: 24522843
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:24522843Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Comparative analysis of different methods for evaluating quality of Quercus ilex seedlings inoculated with Tuber melanosporum.</title><author><name sortKey="Andres Alpuente, Antonio" sort="Andres Alpuente, Antonio" uniqKey="Andres Alpuente A" first="Antonio" last="Andrés-Alpuente">Antonio Andrés-Alpuente</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Instituto de Formación Profesional Específica Movera, Ctra. Pastriz Km. 3,6 Bº Movera, 50194, Zaragoza, Spain, a.andres@voila.fr.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Sanchez, Sergio" sort="Sanchez, Sergio" uniqKey="Sanchez S" first="Sergio" last="Sánchez">Sergio Sánchez</name></author><author><name sortKey="Martin, Maria" sort="Martin, Maria" uniqKey="Martin M" first="María" last="Martín">María Martín</name></author><author><name sortKey="Aguirre, Angel Javier" sort="Aguirre, Angel Javier" uniqKey="Aguirre A" first="Angel Javier" last="Aguirre">Angel Javier Aguirre</name></author><author><name sortKey="Barriuso, Juan J" sort="Barriuso, Juan J" uniqKey="Barriuso J" first="Juan J" last="Barriuso">Juan J. Barriuso</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2014">2014</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:24522843</idno><idno type="pmid">24522843</idno><idno type="doi">10.1007/s00572-014-0563-x</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">001951</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">001951</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Comparative analysis of different methods for evaluating quality of Quercus ilex seedlings inoculated with Tuber melanosporum.</title><author><name sortKey="Andres Alpuente, Antonio" sort="Andres Alpuente, Antonio" uniqKey="Andres Alpuente A" first="Antonio" last="Andrés-Alpuente">Antonio Andrés-Alpuente</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Instituto de Formación Profesional Específica Movera, Ctra. Pastriz Km. 3,6 Bº Movera, 50194, Zaragoza, Spain, a.andres@voila.fr.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Sanchez, Sergio" sort="Sanchez, Sergio" uniqKey="Sanchez S" first="Sergio" last="Sánchez">Sergio Sánchez</name></author><author><name sortKey="Martin, Maria" sort="Martin, Maria" uniqKey="Martin M" first="María" last="Martín">María Martín</name></author><author><name sortKey="Aguirre, Angel Javier" sort="Aguirre, Angel Javier" uniqKey="Aguirre A" first="Angel Javier" last="Aguirre">Angel Javier Aguirre</name></author><author><name sortKey="Barriuso, Juan J" sort="Barriuso, Juan J" uniqKey="Barriuso J" first="Juan J" last="Barriuso">Juan J. Barriuso</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Mycorrhiza</title><idno type="eISSN">1432-1890</idno><imprint><date when="2014" type="published">2014</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Agriculture (MeSH)</term><term>Ascomycota (physiology)</term><term>Mycorrhizae (physiology)</term><term>Quercus (microbiology)</term><term>Seedlings (microbiology)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="microbiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Quercus</term><term>Seedlings</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Ascomycota</term><term>Mycorrhizae</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Agriculture</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The quality of seedlings colonized by Tuber melanosporum is one of the main factors that contributes to the success or failure of a truffle crop. Truffle cultivation has quickly grown in European countries and elsewhere, so a commonly shared seedling evaluation method is needed. Five evaluation methods are currently published in the literature: three are used in Spain and two in France and Italy. Although all estimate the percentage colonization by T. melanosporum mycorrhizae, they do it in different ways. Two methods also estimate total number of mycorrhizae per seedling. Most are destructive. In this work, ten batches of holm oak seedlings inoculated with T. melanosporum from two different nurseries were evaluated by means of the five methods noted above. Some similarity was detected between the percentages of T. melanosporum mycorrhizae estimated by each method but not in their ability to assess the suitability of each batch. We discuss the advantages and disadvantages for each method and suggest approaches to reach consensus within the truffle culture industry for certifying mycorrhizal colonization by T. melanosporum and seedling quality. </div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">24522843</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2014</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>21</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2018</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>13</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1432-1890</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>24 Suppl 1</Volume><PubDate><Year>2014</Year><Month>Apr</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Mycorrhiza</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Mycorrhiza</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Comparative analysis of different methods for evaluating quality of Quercus ilex seedlings inoculated with Tuber melanosporum.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>S29-37</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1007/s00572-014-0563-x</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>The quality of seedlings colonized by Tuber melanosporum is one of the main factors that contributes to the success or failure of a truffle crop. Truffle cultivation has quickly grown in European countries and elsewhere, so a commonly shared seedling evaluation method is needed. Five evaluation methods are currently published in the literature: three are used in Spain and two in France and Italy. Although all estimate the percentage colonization by T. melanosporum mycorrhizae, they do it in different ways. Two methods also estimate total number of mycorrhizae per seedling. Most are destructive. In this work, ten batches of holm oak seedlings inoculated with T. melanosporum from two different nurseries were evaluated by means of the five methods noted above. Some similarity was detected between the percentages of T. melanosporum mycorrhizae estimated by each method but not in their ability to assess the suitability of each batch. We discuss the advantages and disadvantages for each method and suggest approaches to reach consensus within the truffle culture industry for certifying mycorrhizal colonization by T. melanosporum and seedling quality. </AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Andrés-Alpuente</LastName><ForeName>Antonio</ForeName><Initials>A</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Instituto de Formación Profesional Específica Movera, Ctra. Pastriz Km. 3,6 Bº Movera, 50194, Zaragoza, Spain, a.andres@voila.fr.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Sánchez</LastName><ForeName>Sergio</ForeName><Initials>S</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Martín</LastName><ForeName>María</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Aguirre</LastName><ForeName>Angel Javier</ForeName><Initials>AJ</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Barriuso</LastName><ForeName>Juan J</ForeName><Initials>JJ</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016454">Review</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2014</Year><Month>02</Month><Day>13</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Germany</Country><MedlineTA>Mycorrhiza</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>100955036</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0940-6360</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000383" MajorTopicYN="N">Agriculture</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D001203" MajorTopicYN="N">Ascomycota</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="Y">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D038821" MajorTopicYN="N">Mycorrhizae</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="Y">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D029963" MajorTopicYN="N">Quercus</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000382" MajorTopicYN="Y">microbiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D036226" MajorTopicYN="N">Seedlings</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000382" MajorTopicYN="N">microbiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2013</Year><Month>09</Month><Day>25</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2014</Year><Month>01</Month><Day>28</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2014</Year><Month>2</Month><Day>14</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2014</Year><Month>2</Month><Day>14</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2014</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>15</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24522843</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1007/s00572-014-0563-x</ArticleId></ArticleIdList><ReferenceList><Reference><Citation>Mycol Res. 2008 Nov;112(Pt 11):1344-54</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18644445</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1997 Aug 15;153(2):255-60</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">9271850</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mycorrhiza. 2013 Feb;23(2):99-106</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22772310</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2008;178(4):699-702</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18393950</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2006 Jan;254(2):251-7</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16445753</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference></ReferenceList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Bois/explor/MycorrhizaeV1/Data/Main/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001951 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001951 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Bois
|area= MycorrhizaeV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:24522843
|texte= Comparative analysis of different methods for evaluating quality of Quercus ilex seedlings inoculated with Tuber melanosporum.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:24522843" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a MycorrhizaeV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.37. |  |