Serveur d'exploration sur la mycorhize

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Site properties have a stronger influence than fire severity on ectomycorrhizal fungi and associated N-cycling bacteria in regenerating post-beetle-killed lodgepole pine forests.

Identifieur interne : 001607 ( Main/Corpus ); précédent : 001606; suivant : 001608

Site properties have a stronger influence than fire severity on ectomycorrhizal fungi and associated N-cycling bacteria in regenerating post-beetle-killed lodgepole pine forests.

Auteurs : Nabla M. Kennedy ; Susan J. Robertson ; D Scott Green ; Scott R. Scholefield ; Joselito M. Arocena ; Linda E. Tackaberry ; Hugues B. Massicotte ; Keith N. Egger

Source :

RBID : pubmed:25540132

English descriptors

Abstract

Following a pine beetle epidemic in British Columbia, Canada, we investigated the effect of fire severity on rhizosphere soil chemistry and ectomycorrhizal fungi (ECM) and associated denitrifying and nitrogen (N)-fixing bacteria in the root systems of regenerating lodgepole pine seedlings at two site types (wet and dry) and three fire severities (low, moderate, and high). The site type was found to have a much larger impact on all measurements than fire severity. Wet and dry sites differed significantly for almost all soil properties measured, with higher values identified from wet types, except for pH and percent sand that were greater on dry sites. Fire severity caused few changes in soil chemical status. Generally, bacterial communities differed little, whereas ECM morphotype analysis revealed ectomycorrhizal diversity was lower on dry sites, with a corresponding division in community structure between wet and dry sites. Molecular profiling of the fungal ITS region confirmed these results, with a clear difference in community structure seen between wet and dry sites. The ability of ECM fungi to colonize seedlings growing in both wet and dry soils may positively contribute to subsequent regeneration. We conclude that despite consecutive landscape disturbances (mountain pine beetle infestation followed by wildfire), the "signature" of moisture on chemistry and ECM community structure remained pronounced.

DOI: 10.1007/s12223-014-0374-7
PubMed: 25540132

Links to Exploration step

pubmed:25540132

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Site properties have a stronger influence than fire severity on ectomycorrhizal fungi and associated N-cycling bacteria in regenerating post-beetle-killed lodgepole pine forests.</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Kennedy, Nabla M" sort="Kennedy, Nabla M" uniqKey="Kennedy N" first="Nabla M" last="Kennedy">Nabla M. Kennedy</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:affiliation>Ecosystem Science and Management, University of Northern British Columbia, 3333 University Way, Prince George, BC, V2N 4Z9, Canada, nabla.kennedy@gmail.com.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Robertson, Susan J" sort="Robertson, Susan J" uniqKey="Robertson S" first="Susan J" last="Robertson">Susan J. Robertson</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Green, D Scott" sort="Green, D Scott" uniqKey="Green D" first="D Scott" last="Green">D Scott Green</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Scholefield, Scott R" sort="Scholefield, Scott R" uniqKey="Scholefield S" first="Scott R" last="Scholefield">Scott R. Scholefield</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Arocena, Joselito M" sort="Arocena, Joselito M" uniqKey="Arocena J" first="Joselito M" last="Arocena">Joselito M. Arocena</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Tackaberry, Linda E" sort="Tackaberry, Linda E" uniqKey="Tackaberry L" first="Linda E" last="Tackaberry">Linda E. Tackaberry</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Massicotte, Hugues B" sort="Massicotte, Hugues B" uniqKey="Massicotte H" first="Hugues B" last="Massicotte">Hugues B. Massicotte</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Egger, Keith N" sort="Egger, Keith N" uniqKey="Egger K" first="Keith N" last="Egger">Keith N. Egger</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2015">2015</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:25540132</idno>
<idno type="pmid">25540132</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.1007/s12223-014-0374-7</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">001607</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">001607</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en">Site properties have a stronger influence than fire severity on ectomycorrhizal fungi and associated N-cycling bacteria in regenerating post-beetle-killed lodgepole pine forests.</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Kennedy, Nabla M" sort="Kennedy, Nabla M" uniqKey="Kennedy N" first="Nabla M" last="Kennedy">Nabla M. Kennedy</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:affiliation>Ecosystem Science and Management, University of Northern British Columbia, 3333 University Way, Prince George, BC, V2N 4Z9, Canada, nabla.kennedy@gmail.com.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Robertson, Susan J" sort="Robertson, Susan J" uniqKey="Robertson S" first="Susan J" last="Robertson">Susan J. Robertson</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Green, D Scott" sort="Green, D Scott" uniqKey="Green D" first="D Scott" last="Green">D Scott Green</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Scholefield, Scott R" sort="Scholefield, Scott R" uniqKey="Scholefield S" first="Scott R" last="Scholefield">Scott R. Scholefield</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Arocena, Joselito M" sort="Arocena, Joselito M" uniqKey="Arocena J" first="Joselito M" last="Arocena">Joselito M. Arocena</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Tackaberry, Linda E" sort="Tackaberry, Linda E" uniqKey="Tackaberry L" first="Linda E" last="Tackaberry">Linda E. Tackaberry</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Massicotte, Hugues B" sort="Massicotte, Hugues B" uniqKey="Massicotte H" first="Hugues B" last="Massicotte">Hugues B. Massicotte</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Egger, Keith N" sort="Egger, Keith N" uniqKey="Egger K" first="Keith N" last="Egger">Keith N. Egger</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j">Folia microbiologica</title>
<idno type="eISSN">1874-9356</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2015" type="published">2015</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Animals (MeSH)</term>
<term>Bacteria (classification)</term>
<term>Bacteria (genetics)</term>
<term>Bacteria (isolation & purification)</term>
<term>Bacteria (metabolism)</term>
<term>Coleoptera (physiology)</term>
<term>Ecosystem (MeSH)</term>
<term>Fires (MeSH)</term>
<term>Fungi (classification)</term>
<term>Fungi (genetics)</term>
<term>Fungi (isolation & purification)</term>
<term>Mycorrhizae (classification)</term>
<term>Mycorrhizae (genetics)</term>
<term>Mycorrhizae (growth & development)</term>
<term>Mycorrhizae (isolation & purification)</term>
<term>Nitrogen (metabolism)</term>
<term>Pinus (growth & development)</term>
<term>Pinus (microbiology)</term>
<term>Pinus (parasitology)</term>
<term>Plant Diseases (parasitology)</term>
<term>Rhizosphere (MeSH)</term>
<term>Soil (chemistry)</term>
<term>Trees (growth & development)</term>
<term>Trees (microbiology)</term>
<term>Trees (parasitology)</term>
<term>Water (analysis)</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="analysis" xml:lang="en">
<term>Water</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="chemistry" xml:lang="en">
<term>Soil</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="metabolism" xml:lang="en">
<term>Nitrogen</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="classification" xml:lang="en">
<term>Bacteria</term>
<term>Fungi</term>
<term>Mycorrhizae</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="genetics" xml:lang="en">
<term>Bacteria</term>
<term>Fungi</term>
<term>Mycorrhizae</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="growth & development" xml:lang="en">
<term>Mycorrhizae</term>
<term>Pinus</term>
<term>Trees</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="isolation & purification" xml:lang="en">
<term>Bacteria</term>
<term>Fungi</term>
<term>Mycorrhizae</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="metabolism" xml:lang="en">
<term>Bacteria</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="microbiology" xml:lang="en">
<term>Pinus</term>
<term>Trees</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="parasitology" xml:lang="en">
<term>Pinus</term>
<term>Plant Diseases</term>
<term>Trees</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiology" xml:lang="en">
<term>Coleoptera</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en">
<term>Animals</term>
<term>Ecosystem</term>
<term>Fires</term>
<term>Rhizosphere</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Following a pine beetle epidemic in British Columbia, Canada, we investigated the effect of fire severity on rhizosphere soil chemistry and ectomycorrhizal fungi (ECM) and associated denitrifying and nitrogen (N)-fixing bacteria in the root systems of regenerating lodgepole pine seedlings at two site types (wet and dry) and three fire severities (low, moderate, and high). The site type was found to have a much larger impact on all measurements than fire severity. Wet and dry sites differed significantly for almost all soil properties measured, with higher values identified from wet types, except for pH and percent sand that were greater on dry sites. Fire severity caused few changes in soil chemical status. Generally, bacterial communities differed little, whereas ECM morphotype analysis revealed ectomycorrhizal diversity was lower on dry sites, with a corresponding division in community structure between wet and dry sites. Molecular profiling of the fungal ITS region confirmed these results, with a clear difference in community structure seen between wet and dry sites. The ability of ECM fungi to colonize seedlings growing in both wet and dry soils may positively contribute to subsequent regeneration. We conclude that despite consecutive landscape disturbances (mountain pine beetle infestation followed by wildfire), the "signature" of moisture on chemistry and ECM community structure remained pronounced. </div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed>
<MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM">
<PMID Version="1">25540132</PMID>
<DateCompleted>
<Year>2016</Year>
<Month>04</Month>
<Day>27</Day>
</DateCompleted>
<DateRevised>
<Year>2018</Year>
<Month>11</Month>
<Day>13</Day>
</DateRevised>
<Article PubModel="Print-Electronic">
<Journal>
<ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1874-9356</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet">
<Volume>60</Volume>
<Issue>5</Issue>
<PubDate>
<Year>2015</Year>
<Month>Sep</Month>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>Folia microbiologica</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>Folia Microbiol (Praha)</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Site properties have a stronger influence than fire severity on ectomycorrhizal fungi and associated N-cycling bacteria in regenerating post-beetle-killed lodgepole pine forests.</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination>
<MedlinePgn>399-410</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1007/s12223-014-0374-7</ELocationID>
<Abstract>
<AbstractText>Following a pine beetle epidemic in British Columbia, Canada, we investigated the effect of fire severity on rhizosphere soil chemistry and ectomycorrhizal fungi (ECM) and associated denitrifying and nitrogen (N)-fixing bacteria in the root systems of regenerating lodgepole pine seedlings at two site types (wet and dry) and three fire severities (low, moderate, and high). The site type was found to have a much larger impact on all measurements than fire severity. Wet and dry sites differed significantly for almost all soil properties measured, with higher values identified from wet types, except for pH and percent sand that were greater on dry sites. Fire severity caused few changes in soil chemical status. Generally, bacterial communities differed little, whereas ECM morphotype analysis revealed ectomycorrhizal diversity was lower on dry sites, with a corresponding division in community structure between wet and dry sites. Molecular profiling of the fungal ITS region confirmed these results, with a clear difference in community structure seen between wet and dry sites. The ability of ECM fungi to colonize seedlings growing in both wet and dry soils may positively contribute to subsequent regeneration. We conclude that despite consecutive landscape disturbances (mountain pine beetle infestation followed by wildfire), the "signature" of moisture on chemistry and ECM community structure remained pronounced. </AbstractText>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y">
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Kennedy</LastName>
<ForeName>Nabla M</ForeName>
<Initials>NM</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo>
<Affiliation>Ecosystem Science and Management, University of Northern British Columbia, 3333 University Way, Prince George, BC, V2N 4Z9, Canada, nabla.kennedy@gmail.com.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Robertson</LastName>
<ForeName>Susan J</ForeName>
<Initials>SJ</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Green</LastName>
<ForeName>D Scott</ForeName>
<Initials>DS</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Scholefield</LastName>
<ForeName>Scott R</ForeName>
<Initials>SR</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Arocena</LastName>
<ForeName>Joselito M</ForeName>
<Initials>JM</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Tackaberry</LastName>
<ForeName>Linda E</ForeName>
<Initials>LE</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Massicotte</LastName>
<ForeName>Hugues B</ForeName>
<Initials>HB</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Egger</LastName>
<ForeName>Keith N</ForeName>
<Initials>KN</Initials>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>eng</Language>
<PublicationTypeList>
<PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
<ArticleDate DateType="Electronic">
<Year>2014</Year>
<Month>12</Month>
<Day>25</Day>
</ArticleDate>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo>
<Country>United States</Country>
<MedlineTA>Folia Microbiol (Praha)</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>0376757</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>0015-5632</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
<ChemicalList>
<Chemical>
<RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber>
<NameOfSubstance UI="D012987">Soil</NameOfSubstance>
</Chemical>
<Chemical>
<RegistryNumber>059QF0KO0R</RegistryNumber>
<NameOfSubstance UI="D014867">Water</NameOfSubstance>
</Chemical>
<Chemical>
<RegistryNumber>N762921K75</RegistryNumber>
<NameOfSubstance UI="D009584">Nitrogen</NameOfSubstance>
</Chemical>
</ChemicalList>
<CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset>
<MeshHeadingList>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D000818" MajorTopicYN="N">Animals</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D001419" MajorTopicYN="N">Bacteria</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000145" MajorTopicYN="N">classification</QualifierName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000235" MajorTopicYN="N">genetics</QualifierName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000302" MajorTopicYN="Y">isolation & purification</QualifierName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000378" MajorTopicYN="N">metabolism</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D001517" MajorTopicYN="N">Coleoptera</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="N">physiology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D017753" MajorTopicYN="N">Ecosystem</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D005390" MajorTopicYN="N">Fires</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D005658" MajorTopicYN="N">Fungi</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000145" MajorTopicYN="N">classification</QualifierName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000235" MajorTopicYN="N">genetics</QualifierName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000302" MajorTopicYN="Y">isolation & purification</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D038821" MajorTopicYN="N">Mycorrhizae</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000145" MajorTopicYN="N">classification</QualifierName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000235" MajorTopicYN="N">genetics</QualifierName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000254" MajorTopicYN="N">growth & development</QualifierName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000302" MajorTopicYN="Y">isolation & purification</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D009584" MajorTopicYN="N">Nitrogen</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000378" MajorTopicYN="N">metabolism</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D028223" MajorTopicYN="N">Pinus</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000254" MajorTopicYN="N">growth & development</QualifierName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000382" MajorTopicYN="Y">microbiology</QualifierName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000469" MajorTopicYN="N">parasitology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D010935" MajorTopicYN="N">Plant Diseases</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000469" MajorTopicYN="N">parasitology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D058441" MajorTopicYN="N">Rhizosphere</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D012987" MajorTopicYN="N">Soil</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000737" MajorTopicYN="Y">chemistry</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D014197" MajorTopicYN="N">Trees</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000254" MajorTopicYN="N">growth & development</QualifierName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000382" MajorTopicYN="Y">microbiology</QualifierName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000469" MajorTopicYN="N">parasitology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D014867" MajorTopicYN="N">Water</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000032" MajorTopicYN="N">analysis</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
</MeshHeadingList>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData>
<History>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received">
<Year>2014</Year>
<Month>05</Month>
<Day>20</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted">
<Year>2014</Year>
<Month>12</Month>
<Day>17</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez">
<Year>2014</Year>
<Month>12</Month>
<Day>26</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed">
<Year>2014</Year>
<Month>12</Month>
<Day>30</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline">
<Year>2016</Year>
<Month>4</Month>
<Day>28</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">25540132</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1007/s12223-014-0374-7</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
<ReferenceList>
<Reference>
<Citation>FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2008 Feb;279(1):15-22</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18070072</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2006 Sep;57(3):409-19</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16907755</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>ISME J. 2014 Sep;8(9):1920-31</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24671082</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Ecology. 2006 Nov;87(11):2773-86</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17168022</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>New Phytol. 2007;176(1):22-36</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17803639</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Mycorrhiza. 2007 Jun;17(4):259-70</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17429700</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2005 Jun 1;53(1):41-50</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16329928</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Environ Microbiol. 2003 Jul;5(7):539-54</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12823187</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007 Aug;73(16):5276-83</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17601815</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 May;71(5):2713-22</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15870363</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>ISME J. 2012 Dec;6(12):2199-218</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22855212</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003 Jul;69(7):3772-6</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12839743</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Mol Ecol Resour. 2008 Jan;8(1):95-8</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21585725</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Microb Ecol. 2006 Jul;52(1):114-26</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16699911</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006 Feb;72(2):1270-8</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16461676</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>PLoS One. 2013 Jun 05;8(6):e65004</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">23755166</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Oecologia. 2013 Aug;172(4):1179-89</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">23263530</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2004 Sep 1;49(3):401-17</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19712290</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Environ Microbiol. 2006 Dec;8(12):2224-30</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17107563</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Mycorrhiza. 2009 Feb;19(2):99-111</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18941804</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jan 29;110(5):1756-60</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">23319612</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Ecology. 2014 Apr;95(4):1096-103</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24933827</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Oecologia. 2005 Mar;143(1):1-10</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15688212</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
</ReferenceList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Bois/explor/MycorrhizaeV1/Data/Main/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001607 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001607 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Bois
   |area=    MycorrhizaeV1
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     pubmed:25540132
   |texte=   Site properties have a stronger influence than fire severity on ectomycorrhizal fungi and associated N-cycling bacteria in regenerating post-beetle-killed lodgepole pine forests.
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:25540132" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a MycorrhizaeV1 

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.37.
Data generation: Wed Nov 18 15:34:48 2020. Site generation: Wed Nov 18 15:41:10 2020