Differences in mycorrhizal communities between Epipactis palustris, E. helleborine and its presumed sister species E. neerlandica.
Identifieur interne : 001145 ( Main/Corpus ); précédent : 001144; suivant : 001146Differences in mycorrhizal communities between Epipactis palustris, E. helleborine and its presumed sister species E. neerlandica.
Auteurs : Hans Jacquemyn ; Michael Waud ; Bart Lievens ; Rein BrysSource :
- Annals of botany [ 1095-8290 ] ; 2016.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- microbiology : Orchidaceae.
- physiology : Mycorrhizae.
- Ascomycota, Basidiomycota, Belgium, Biodiversity, Ecosystem, Forests, Phylogeny, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Symbiosis.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
In orchid species that have populations occurring in strongly contrasting habitats, mycorrhizal divergence and other habitat-specific adaptations may lead to the formation of reproductively isolated taxa and ultimately to species formation. However, little is known about the mycorrhizal communities associated with recently diverged sister taxa that occupy different habitats.
METHODS
In this study, 454 amplicon pyrosequencing was used to investigate mycorrhizal communities associating with Epipactis helleborine in its typical forest habitat and with its presumed sister species E. neerlandica that almost exclusively occurs in coastal dune habitats. Samples of the phylogenetically more distant E. palustris, which co-occurred with E. neerlandica, were also included to investigate the role of habitat-specific conditions on mycorrhizal communities.
RESULTS
A total of 105 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) of putative orchid mycorrhizal fungi were observed in the three studied species. The majority of these fungi were endophytic fungi of Helotiales and ectomycorrhizal fungi belonging to Thelephoraceae, Sebacinaceae and Inocybaceae. In addition, a large number of other ectomycorrhizal taxa were detected, including Cortinarius, Cenococcum, Tuber, Geopora, Wilcoxina, Meliniomyces, Hebeloma, Tricholoma, Russula and Peziza Mycorrhizal communities differed significantly between the three species, but differences were most pronounced between the forest species (E. helleborine) and the two dune slack species (E. neerlandica and E. palustris).
CONCLUSION
The results clearly showed that recently diverged orchid species that occupy different habitats were characterized by significantly different mycorrhizal communities and call for more detailed experiments that aim at elucidating the contribution of habitat-specific adaptations in general and mycorrhizal divergence in particular to the process of speciation in orchids.
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcw015
PubMed: 26946528
PubMed Central: PMC4934391
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:26946528Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Differences in mycorrhizal communities between Epipactis palustris, E. helleborine and its presumed sister species E. neerlandica.</title><author><name sortKey="Jacquemyn, Hans" sort="Jacquemyn, Hans" uniqKey="Jacquemyn H" first="Hans" last="Jacquemyn">Hans Jacquemyn</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>KU Leuven, Department of Biology, Plant Conservation and Population Biology, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium and hans.jacquemyn@bio.kuleuven.be.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Waud, Michael" sort="Waud, Michael" uniqKey="Waud M" first="Michael" last="Waud">Michael Waud</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>KU Leuven, Department of Biology, Plant Conservation and Population Biology, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium and.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lievens, Bart" sort="Lievens, Bart" uniqKey="Lievens B" first="Bart" last="Lievens">Bart Lievens</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>KU Leuven, Campus De Nayer, Department of Microbial and Molecular Systems, Laboratory for Process Microbial Ecology and Bioinspirational Management, B-2860 Sint-Katelijne-Waver, Belgium.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Brys, Rein" sort="Brys, Rein" uniqKey="Brys R" first="Rein" last="Brys">Rein Brys</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>KU Leuven, Department of Biology, Plant Conservation and Population Biology, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium and.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2016">2016</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:26946528</idno><idno type="pmid">26946528</idno><idno type="doi">10.1093/aob/mcw015</idno><idno type="pmc">PMC4934391</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">001145</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">001145</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Differences in mycorrhizal communities between Epipactis palustris, E. helleborine and its presumed sister species E. neerlandica.</title><author><name sortKey="Jacquemyn, Hans" sort="Jacquemyn, Hans" uniqKey="Jacquemyn H" first="Hans" last="Jacquemyn">Hans Jacquemyn</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>KU Leuven, Department of Biology, Plant Conservation and Population Biology, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium and hans.jacquemyn@bio.kuleuven.be.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Waud, Michael" sort="Waud, Michael" uniqKey="Waud M" first="Michael" last="Waud">Michael Waud</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>KU Leuven, Department of Biology, Plant Conservation and Population Biology, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium and.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lievens, Bart" sort="Lievens, Bart" uniqKey="Lievens B" first="Bart" last="Lievens">Bart Lievens</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>KU Leuven, Campus De Nayer, Department of Microbial and Molecular Systems, Laboratory for Process Microbial Ecology and Bioinspirational Management, B-2860 Sint-Katelijne-Waver, Belgium.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Brys, Rein" sort="Brys, Rein" uniqKey="Brys R" first="Rein" last="Brys">Rein Brys</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>KU Leuven, Department of Biology, Plant Conservation and Population Biology, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium and.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Annals of botany</title><idno type="eISSN">1095-8290</idno><imprint><date when="2016" type="published">2016</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Ascomycota (MeSH)</term><term>Basidiomycota (MeSH)</term><term>Belgium (MeSH)</term><term>Biodiversity (MeSH)</term><term>Ecosystem (MeSH)</term><term>Forests (MeSH)</term><term>Mycorrhizae (physiology)</term><term>Orchidaceae (microbiology)</term><term>Phylogeny (MeSH)</term><term>Sequence Analysis, DNA (MeSH)</term><term>Symbiosis (MeSH)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="microbiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Orchidaceae</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Mycorrhizae</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Ascomycota</term><term>Basidiomycota</term><term>Belgium</term><term>Biodiversity</term><term>Ecosystem</term><term>Forests</term><term>Phylogeny</term><term>Sequence Analysis, DNA</term><term>Symbiosis</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>BACKGROUND AND AIMS</b></p><p>In orchid species that have populations occurring in strongly contrasting habitats, mycorrhizal divergence and other habitat-specific adaptations may lead to the formation of reproductively isolated taxa and ultimately to species formation. However, little is known about the mycorrhizal communities associated with recently diverged sister taxa that occupy different habitats.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>METHODS</b></p><p>In this study, 454 amplicon pyrosequencing was used to investigate mycorrhizal communities associating with Epipactis helleborine in its typical forest habitat and with its presumed sister species E. neerlandica that almost exclusively occurs in coastal dune habitats. Samples of the phylogenetically more distant E. palustris, which co-occurred with E. neerlandica, were also included to investigate the role of habitat-specific conditions on mycorrhizal communities.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>RESULTS</b></p><p>A total of 105 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) of putative orchid mycorrhizal fungi were observed in the three studied species. The majority of these fungi were endophytic fungi of Helotiales and ectomycorrhizal fungi belonging to Thelephoraceae, Sebacinaceae and Inocybaceae. In addition, a large number of other ectomycorrhizal taxa were detected, including Cortinarius, Cenococcum, Tuber, Geopora, Wilcoxina, Meliniomyces, Hebeloma, Tricholoma, Russula and Peziza Mycorrhizal communities differed significantly between the three species, but differences were most pronounced between the forest species (E. helleborine) and the two dune slack species (E. neerlandica and E. palustris).</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>CONCLUSION</b></p><p>The results clearly showed that recently diverged orchid species that occupy different habitats were characterized by significantly different mycorrhizal communities and call for more detailed experiments that aim at elucidating the contribution of habitat-specific adaptations in general and mycorrhizal divergence in particular to the process of speciation in orchids.</p></div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">26946528</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2017</Year><Month>08</Month><Day>16</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2018</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>13</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1095-8290</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>118</Volume><Issue>1</Issue><PubDate><Year>2016</Year><Month>07</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Annals of botany</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Ann Bot</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Differences in mycorrhizal communities between Epipactis palustris, E. helleborine and its presumed sister species E. neerlandica.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>105-14</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1093/aob/mcw015</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText Label="BACKGROUND AND AIMS">In orchid species that have populations occurring in strongly contrasting habitats, mycorrhizal divergence and other habitat-specific adaptations may lead to the formation of reproductively isolated taxa and ultimately to species formation. However, little is known about the mycorrhizal communities associated with recently diverged sister taxa that occupy different habitats.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="METHODS">In this study, 454 amplicon pyrosequencing was used to investigate mycorrhizal communities associating with Epipactis helleborine in its typical forest habitat and with its presumed sister species E. neerlandica that almost exclusively occurs in coastal dune habitats. Samples of the phylogenetically more distant E. palustris, which co-occurred with E. neerlandica, were also included to investigate the role of habitat-specific conditions on mycorrhizal communities.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="RESULTS">A total of 105 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) of putative orchid mycorrhizal fungi were observed in the three studied species. The majority of these fungi were endophytic fungi of Helotiales and ectomycorrhizal fungi belonging to Thelephoraceae, Sebacinaceae and Inocybaceae. In addition, a large number of other ectomycorrhizal taxa were detected, including Cortinarius, Cenococcum, Tuber, Geopora, Wilcoxina, Meliniomyces, Hebeloma, Tricholoma, Russula and Peziza Mycorrhizal communities differed significantly between the three species, but differences were most pronounced between the forest species (E. helleborine) and the two dune slack species (E. neerlandica and E. palustris).</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSION">The results clearly showed that recently diverged orchid species that occupy different habitats were characterized by significantly different mycorrhizal communities and call for more detailed experiments that aim at elucidating the contribution of habitat-specific adaptations in general and mycorrhizal divergence in particular to the process of speciation in orchids.</AbstractText><CopyrightInformation>© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.</CopyrightInformation></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Jacquemyn</LastName><ForeName>Hans</ForeName><Initials>H</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>KU Leuven, Department of Biology, Plant Conservation and Population Biology, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium and hans.jacquemyn@bio.kuleuven.be.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Waud</LastName><ForeName>Michael</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>KU Leuven, Department of Biology, Plant Conservation and Population Biology, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium and.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Lievens</LastName><ForeName>Bart</ForeName><Initials>B</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>KU Leuven, Campus De Nayer, Department of Microbial and Molecular Systems, Laboratory for Process Microbial Ecology and Bioinspirational Management, B-2860 Sint-Katelijne-Waver, Belgium.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Brys</LastName><ForeName>Rein</ForeName><Initials>R</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>KU Leuven, Department of Biology, Plant Conservation and Population Biology, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium and.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><GrantList CompleteYN="Y"><Grant><GrantID>260601</GrantID><Agency>European Research Council</Agency><Country>International</Country></Grant></GrantList><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2016</Year><Month>03</Month><Day>05</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>England</Country><MedlineTA>Ann Bot</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>0372347</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0305-7364</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D001203" MajorTopicYN="N">Ascomycota</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D001487" MajorTopicYN="N">Basidiomycota</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D001530" MajorTopicYN="N">Belgium</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D044822" MajorTopicYN="N">Biodiversity</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017753" MajorTopicYN="N">Ecosystem</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D065928" MajorTopicYN="N">Forests</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D038821" MajorTopicYN="N">Mycorrhizae</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="Y">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D029595" MajorTopicYN="N">Orchidaceae</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000382" MajorTopicYN="Y">microbiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010802" MajorTopicYN="N">Phylogeny</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017422" MajorTopicYN="N">Sequence Analysis, DNA</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013559" MajorTopicYN="N">Symbiosis</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList><KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM"><Keyword MajorTopicYN="Y">Epipactis</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="Y">Habitat adaptation</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="Y">mycorrhizal divergence</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="Y">speciation</Keyword></KeywordList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2015</Year><Month>07</Month><Day>02</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2015</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>11</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2016</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>7</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2016</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>8</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2017</Year><Month>8</Month><Day>17</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">26946528</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">mcw015</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1093/aob/mcw015</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC4934391</ArticleId></ArticleIdList><ReferenceList><Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2015 May;206(3):1127-34</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">25614926</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2014 Apr;202(2):616-27</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24325257</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Clin Microbiol. 1999 Jun;37(6):1846-51</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">10325335</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Nat Methods. 2013 Oct;10(10):996-8</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">23955772</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mol Ecol Resour. 2014 Jul;14(4):679-99</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24460947</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mol Ecol. 2013 Apr;22(8):2341-54</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">23432406</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Sep 7;271(1550):1799-806</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15315895</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Ann Bot. 2009 Aug;104(3):543-56</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19218582</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Evolution. 2005 Apr;59(4):705-19</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15926683</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Am J Bot. 2008 Feb;95(2):156-64</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21632341</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Am J Bot. 1998 Dec;85(12):1657</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21680327</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Bioinformatics. 2011 Aug 15;27(16):2194-200</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21700674</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Evolution. 2007 Jan;61(1):68-82</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17300428</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mol Ecol. 2010 Aug;19(15):3226-42</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20618899</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mol Ecol. 2008 Aug;17(16):3707-16</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18627452</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Nucleic Acids Res. 2008 Jan;36(Database issue):D25-30</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18073190</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2012 Dec;82(3):666-77</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22738186</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2015 Mar;205(4):1608-18</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">25546739</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Ecol Lett. 2015 Aug;18(8):807-16</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">26032408</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Evolution. 2014 May;68(5):1281-93</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24372301</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Mol Biol. 1990 Oct 5;215(3):403-10</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">2231712</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mol Ecol. 2002 Oct;11(10):1957-64</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12296940</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Microb Ecol. 2004 May;47(4):416-26</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15107957</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Evolution. 2008 Sep;62(9):2196-214</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18637837</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Am J Bot. 2012 Jun;99(6):1020-32</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22688426</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Am Nat. 2011 Feb;177(2):E54-68</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21460551</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mycorrhiza. 2008 Sep;18(6-7):331-8</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18661158</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>PLoS One. 2014 Jun 17;9(6):e99852</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24937200</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Ann Bot. 2011 Mar;107(3):427-36</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21193482</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Environ Microbiol. 2009 Dec;11(12):3166-78</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19671076</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mol Ecol. 2015 Jul;24(13):3269-80</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">25963669</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mycorrhiza. 2008 Dec;19(1):15-25</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18795339</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Trends Ecol Evol. 2006 Feb;21(2):64-5; author reply 65-6</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16701475</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference></ReferenceList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Bois/explor/MycorrhizaeV1/Data/Main/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001145 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001145 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Bois
|area= MycorrhizaeV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:26946528
|texte= Differences in mycorrhizal communities between Epipactis palustris, E. helleborine and its presumed sister species E. neerlandica.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:26946528" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a MycorrhizaeV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.37. |  |