Signals and cues in the evolution of plant-microbe communication.
Identifieur interne : 001018 ( Main/Corpus ); précédent : 001017; suivant : 001019Signals and cues in the evolution of plant-microbe communication.
Auteurs : Anouk Van'T Padje ; Matthew D. Whiteside ; E Toby KiersSource :
- Current opinion in plant biology [ 1879-0356 ] ; 2016.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- microbiology : Plants.
- physiology : Mycorrhizae, Symbiosis.
- Biological Evolution.
Abstract
Communication has played a key role in organismal evolution. If sender and receiver have a shared interest in propagating reliable information, such as when they are kin relatives, then effective communication can bring large fitness benefits. However, interspecific communication (among different species) is more prone to dishonesty. Over the last decade, plants and their microbial root symbionts have become a model system for studying interspecific molecular crosstalk. However, less is known about the evolutionary stability of plant-microbe communication. What prevents partners from hijacking or manipulating information to their own benefit? Here, we focus on communication between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and their host plants. We ask how partners use directed signals to convey specific information, and highlight research on the problem of dishonest signaling.
DOI: 10.1016/j.pbi.2016.06.006
PubMed: 27348594
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:27348594Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Signals and cues in the evolution of plant-microbe communication.</title><author><name sortKey="Padje, Anouk Van T" sort="Padje, Anouk Van T" uniqKey="Padje A" first="Anouk Van'T" last="Padje">Anouk Van'T Padje</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Institute of Ecological Science, Vrije Universiteit, 1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Whiteside, Matthew D" sort="Whiteside, Matthew D" uniqKey="Whiteside M" first="Matthew D" last="Whiteside">Matthew D. Whiteside</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Institute of Ecological Science, Vrije Universiteit, 1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Kiers, E Toby" sort="Kiers, E Toby" uniqKey="Kiers E" first="E Toby" last="Kiers">E Toby Kiers</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Institute of Ecological Science, Vrije Universiteit, 1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands. Electronic address: toby.kiers@vu.nl.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2016">2016</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:27348594</idno><idno type="pmid">27348594</idno><idno type="doi">10.1016/j.pbi.2016.06.006</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">001018</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">001018</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Signals and cues in the evolution of plant-microbe communication.</title><author><name sortKey="Padje, Anouk Van T" sort="Padje, Anouk Van T" uniqKey="Padje A" first="Anouk Van'T" last="Padje">Anouk Van'T Padje</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Institute of Ecological Science, Vrije Universiteit, 1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Whiteside, Matthew D" sort="Whiteside, Matthew D" uniqKey="Whiteside M" first="Matthew D" last="Whiteside">Matthew D. Whiteside</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Institute of Ecological Science, Vrije Universiteit, 1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Kiers, E Toby" sort="Kiers, E Toby" uniqKey="Kiers E" first="E Toby" last="Kiers">E Toby Kiers</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Institute of Ecological Science, Vrije Universiteit, 1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands. Electronic address: toby.kiers@vu.nl.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Current opinion in plant biology</title><idno type="eISSN">1879-0356</idno><imprint><date when="2016" type="published">2016</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Biological Evolution (MeSH)</term><term>Mycorrhizae (physiology)</term><term>Plants (microbiology)</term><term>Symbiosis (physiology)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="microbiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Plants</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Mycorrhizae</term><term>Symbiosis</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Biological Evolution</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Communication has played a key role in organismal evolution. If sender and receiver have a shared interest in propagating reliable information, such as when they are kin relatives, then effective communication can bring large fitness benefits. However, interspecific communication (among different species) is more prone to dishonesty. Over the last decade, plants and their microbial root symbionts have become a model system for studying interspecific molecular crosstalk. However, less is known about the evolutionary stability of plant-microbe communication. What prevents partners from hijacking or manipulating information to their own benefit? Here, we focus on communication between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and their host plants. We ask how partners use directed signals to convey specific information, and highlight research on the problem of dishonest signaling.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">27348594</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2017</Year><Month>09</Month><Day>19</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2018</Year><Month>02</Month><Day>22</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1879-0356</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>32</Volume><PubDate><Year>2016</Year><Month>08</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Current opinion in plant biology</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Curr Opin Plant Biol</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Signals and cues in the evolution of plant-microbe communication.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>47-52</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="pii" ValidYN="Y">S1369-5266(16)30089-9</ELocationID><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1016/j.pbi.2016.06.006</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>Communication has played a key role in organismal evolution. If sender and receiver have a shared interest in propagating reliable information, such as when they are kin relatives, then effective communication can bring large fitness benefits. However, interspecific communication (among different species) is more prone to dishonesty. Over the last decade, plants and their microbial root symbionts have become a model system for studying interspecific molecular crosstalk. However, less is known about the evolutionary stability of plant-microbe communication. What prevents partners from hijacking or manipulating information to their own benefit? Here, we focus on communication between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and their host plants. We ask how partners use directed signals to convey specific information, and highlight research on the problem of dishonest signaling.</AbstractText><CopyrightInformation>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</CopyrightInformation></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Padje</LastName><ForeName>Anouk Van't</ForeName><Initials>AV</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Institute of Ecological Science, Vrije Universiteit, 1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Whiteside</LastName><ForeName>Matthew D</ForeName><Initials>MD</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Institute of Ecological Science, Vrije Universiteit, 1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Kiers</LastName><ForeName>E Toby</ForeName><Initials>ET</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Institute of Ecological Science, Vrije Universiteit, 1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands. Electronic address: toby.kiers@vu.nl.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016454">Review</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2016</Year><Month>06</Month><Day>24</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>England</Country><MedlineTA>Curr Opin Plant Biol</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>100883395</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1369-5266</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005075" MajorTopicYN="Y">Biological Evolution</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D038821" MajorTopicYN="N">Mycorrhizae</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="N">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010944" MajorTopicYN="N">Plants</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000382" MajorTopicYN="Y">microbiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013559" MajorTopicYN="N">Symbiosis</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="N">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2016</Year><Month>02</Month><Day>19</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="revised"><Year>2016</Year><Month>06</Month><Day>06</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2016</Year><Month>06</Month><Day>07</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2016</Year><Month>6</Month><Day>28</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2016</Year><Month>6</Month><Day>28</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2017</Year><Month>9</Month><Day>20</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">27348594</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">S1369-5266(16)30089-9</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1016/j.pbi.2016.06.006</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Bois/explor/MycorrhizaeV1/Data/Main/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001018 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001018 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Bois
|area= MycorrhizaeV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:27348594
|texte= Signals and cues in the evolution of plant-microbe communication.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:27348594" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a MycorrhizaeV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.37. |  |