Metatranscriptomic Study of Common and Host-Specific Patterns of Gene Expression between Pines and Their Symbiotic Ectomycorrhizal Fungi in the Genus Suillus.
Identifieur interne : 000F20 ( Main/Corpus ); précédent : 000F19; suivant : 000F21Metatranscriptomic Study of Common and Host-Specific Patterns of Gene Expression between Pines and Their Symbiotic Ectomycorrhizal Fungi in the Genus Suillus.
Auteurs : Hui-Ling Liao ; Yuan Chen ; Rytas VilgalysSource :
- PLoS genetics [ 1553-7404 ] ; 2016.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Ecosystem (MeSH), Fungal Proteins (biosynthesis), Fungal Proteins (genetics), Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal (MeSH), Host-Pathogen Interactions (genetics), Metagenome (genetics), Mycorrhizae (genetics), Mycorrhizae (pathogenicity), Pinus (genetics), Pinus (microbiology), Plant Roots (microbiology), Symbiosis (genetics), Transcriptome (genetics).
- MESH :
- chemical , biosynthesis : Fungal Proteins.
- chemical , genetics : Fungal Proteins.
- genetics : Host-Pathogen Interactions, Metagenome, Mycorrhizae, Pinus, Symbiosis, Transcriptome.
- microbiology : Pinus, Plant Roots.
- pathogenicity : Mycorrhizae.
- Ecosystem, Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal.
Abstract
Ectomycorrhizal fungi (EMF) represent one of the major guilds of symbiotic fungi associated with roots of forest trees, where they function to improve plant nutrition and fitness in exchange for plant carbon. Many groups of EMF exhibit preference or specificity for different plant host genera; a good example is the genus Suillus, which grows in association with the conifer family Pinaceae. We investigated genetics of EMF host-specificity by cross-inoculating basidiospores of five species of Suillus onto ten species of Pinus, and screened them for their ability to form ectomycorrhizae. Several Suillus spp. including S. granulatus, S. spraguei, and S. americanus readily formed ectomycorrhizae (compatible reaction) with white pine hosts (subgenus Strobus), but were incompatible with other pine hosts (subgenus Pinus). Metatranscriptomic analysis of inoculated roots reveals that plant and fungus each express unique gene sets during incompatible vs. compatible pairings. The Suillus-Pinus metatranscriptomes utilize highly conserved gene regulatory pathways, including fungal G-protein signaling, secretory pathways, leucine-rich repeat and pathogen resistance proteins that are similar to those associated with host-pathogen interactions in other plant-fungal systems. Metatranscriptomic study of the combined Suillus-Pinus transcriptome has provided new insight into mechanisms of adaptation and coevolution of forest trees with their microbial community, and revealed that genetic regulation of ectomycorrhizal symbiosis utilizes universal gene regulatory pathways used by other types of fungal-plant interactions including pathogenic fungal-host interactions.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006348
PubMed: 27736883
PubMed Central: PMC5065116
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:27736883Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Metatranscriptomic Study of Common and Host-Specific Patterns of Gene Expression between Pines and Their Symbiotic Ectomycorrhizal Fungi in the Genus Suillus.</title><author><name sortKey="Liao, Hui Ling" sort="Liao, Hui Ling" uniqKey="Liao H" first="Hui-Ling" last="Liao">Hui-Ling Liao</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Chen, Yuan" sort="Chen, Yuan" uniqKey="Chen Y" first="Yuan" last="Chen">Yuan Chen</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Vilgalys, Rytas" sort="Vilgalys, Rytas" uniqKey="Vilgalys R" first="Rytas" last="Vilgalys">Rytas Vilgalys</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2016">2016</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:27736883</idno><idno type="pmid">27736883</idno><idno type="doi">10.1371/journal.pgen.1006348</idno><idno type="pmc">PMC5065116</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">000F20</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000F20</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Metatranscriptomic Study of Common and Host-Specific Patterns of Gene Expression between Pines and Their Symbiotic Ectomycorrhizal Fungi in the Genus Suillus.</title><author><name sortKey="Liao, Hui Ling" sort="Liao, Hui Ling" uniqKey="Liao H" first="Hui-Ling" last="Liao">Hui-Ling Liao</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Chen, Yuan" sort="Chen, Yuan" uniqKey="Chen Y" first="Yuan" last="Chen">Yuan Chen</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Vilgalys, Rytas" sort="Vilgalys, Rytas" uniqKey="Vilgalys R" first="Rytas" last="Vilgalys">Rytas Vilgalys</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">PLoS genetics</title><idno type="eISSN">1553-7404</idno><imprint><date when="2016" type="published">2016</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Ecosystem (MeSH)</term><term>Fungal Proteins (biosynthesis)</term><term>Fungal Proteins (genetics)</term><term>Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal (MeSH)</term><term>Host-Pathogen Interactions (genetics)</term><term>Metagenome (genetics)</term><term>Mycorrhizae (genetics)</term><term>Mycorrhizae (pathogenicity)</term><term>Pinus (genetics)</term><term>Pinus (microbiology)</term><term>Plant Roots (microbiology)</term><term>Symbiosis (genetics)</term><term>Transcriptome (genetics)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="biosynthesis" xml:lang="en"><term>Fungal Proteins</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="genetics" xml:lang="en"><term>Fungal Proteins</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="genetics" xml:lang="en"><term>Host-Pathogen Interactions</term><term>Metagenome</term><term>Mycorrhizae</term><term>Pinus</term><term>Symbiosis</term><term>Transcriptome</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="microbiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Pinus</term><term>Plant Roots</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="pathogenicity" xml:lang="en"><term>Mycorrhizae</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Ecosystem</term><term>Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Ectomycorrhizal fungi (EMF) represent one of the major guilds of symbiotic fungi associated with roots of forest trees, where they function to improve plant nutrition and fitness in exchange for plant carbon. Many groups of EMF exhibit preference or specificity for different plant host genera; a good example is the genus Suillus, which grows in association with the conifer family Pinaceae. We investigated genetics of EMF host-specificity by cross-inoculating basidiospores of five species of Suillus onto ten species of Pinus, and screened them for their ability to form ectomycorrhizae. Several Suillus spp. including S. granulatus, S. spraguei, and S. americanus readily formed ectomycorrhizae (compatible reaction) with white pine hosts (subgenus Strobus), but were incompatible with other pine hosts (subgenus Pinus). Metatranscriptomic analysis of inoculated roots reveals that plant and fungus each express unique gene sets during incompatible vs. compatible pairings. The Suillus-Pinus metatranscriptomes utilize highly conserved gene regulatory pathways, including fungal G-protein signaling, secretory pathways, leucine-rich repeat and pathogen resistance proteins that are similar to those associated with host-pathogen interactions in other plant-fungal systems. Metatranscriptomic study of the combined Suillus-Pinus transcriptome has provided new insight into mechanisms of adaptation and coevolution of forest trees with their microbial community, and revealed that genetic regulation of ectomycorrhizal symbiosis utilizes universal gene regulatory pathways used by other types of fungal-plant interactions including pathogenic fungal-host interactions.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">27736883</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2017</Year><Month>05</Month><Day>09</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2018</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>13</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Electronic-eCollection"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1553-7404</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>12</Volume><Issue>10</Issue><PubDate><Year>2016</Year><Month>Oct</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>PLoS genetics</Title><ISOAbbreviation>PLoS Genet</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Metatranscriptomic Study of Common and Host-Specific Patterns of Gene Expression between Pines and Their Symbiotic Ectomycorrhizal Fungi in the Genus Suillus.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>e1006348</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1371/journal.pgen.1006348</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>Ectomycorrhizal fungi (EMF) represent one of the major guilds of symbiotic fungi associated with roots of forest trees, where they function to improve plant nutrition and fitness in exchange for plant carbon. Many groups of EMF exhibit preference or specificity for different plant host genera; a good example is the genus Suillus, which grows in association with the conifer family Pinaceae. We investigated genetics of EMF host-specificity by cross-inoculating basidiospores of five species of Suillus onto ten species of Pinus, and screened them for their ability to form ectomycorrhizae. Several Suillus spp. including S. granulatus, S. spraguei, and S. americanus readily formed ectomycorrhizae (compatible reaction) with white pine hosts (subgenus Strobus), but were incompatible with other pine hosts (subgenus Pinus). Metatranscriptomic analysis of inoculated roots reveals that plant and fungus each express unique gene sets during incompatible vs. compatible pairings. The Suillus-Pinus metatranscriptomes utilize highly conserved gene regulatory pathways, including fungal G-protein signaling, secretory pathways, leucine-rich repeat and pathogen resistance proteins that are similar to those associated with host-pathogen interactions in other plant-fungal systems. Metatranscriptomic study of the combined Suillus-Pinus transcriptome has provided new insight into mechanisms of adaptation and coevolution of forest trees with their microbial community, and revealed that genetic regulation of ectomycorrhizal symbiosis utilizes universal gene regulatory pathways used by other types of fungal-plant interactions including pathogenic fungal-host interactions.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Liao</LastName><ForeName>Hui-Ling</ForeName><Initials>HL</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Chen</LastName><ForeName>Yuan</ForeName><Initials>Y</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Vilgalys</LastName><ForeName>Rytas</ForeName><Initials>R</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2016</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>13</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>PLoS Genet</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>101239074</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1553-7390</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D005656">Fungal Proteins</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><CommentsCorrectionsList><CommentsCorrections RefType="ErratumIn"><RefSource>PLoS Genet. 2017 Jan 26;13(1):e1006575</RefSource><PMID Version="1">28125587</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="ErratumIn"><RefSource>PLoS Genet. 2018 Oct 19;14(10):e1007742</RefSource><PMID Version="1">30339692</PMID></CommentsCorrections></CommentsCorrectionsList><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017753" MajorTopicYN="N">Ecosystem</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005656" MajorTopicYN="N">Fungal Proteins</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000096" MajorTopicYN="N">biosynthesis</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000235" MajorTopicYN="N">genetics</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015966" MajorTopicYN="N">Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D054884" MajorTopicYN="N">Host-Pathogen Interactions</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000235" MajorTopicYN="Y">genetics</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D054892" MajorTopicYN="N">Metagenome</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000235" MajorTopicYN="N">genetics</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D038821" MajorTopicYN="N">Mycorrhizae</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000235" MajorTopicYN="Y">genetics</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000472" MajorTopicYN="N">pathogenicity</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D028223" MajorTopicYN="N">Pinus</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000235" MajorTopicYN="Y">genetics</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000382" MajorTopicYN="N">microbiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D018517" MajorTopicYN="N">Plant Roots</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000382" MajorTopicYN="N">microbiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013559" MajorTopicYN="N">Symbiosis</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000235" MajorTopicYN="N">genetics</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D059467" MajorTopicYN="N">Transcriptome</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000235" MajorTopicYN="Y">genetics</QualifierName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList><CoiStatement>The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.</CoiStatement></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2016</Year><Month>01</Month><Day>11</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2016</Year><Month>09</Month><Day>08</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2016</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>14</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2016</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>14</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2017</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>10</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>epublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">27736883</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1371/journal.pgen.1006348</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">PGENETICS-D-16-00078</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC5065116</ArticleId></ArticleIdList><ReferenceList><Reference><Citation>Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2004 Apr;17(4):394-403</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15077672</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Plant Cell. 1994 Jul;6(7):927-33</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">8069104</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Am J Bot. 2005 Dec;92(12):2086-100</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21646125</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mol Ecol. 2015 Jun;24(11):2747-58</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">25728665</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Apr 29;111(17):6341-6</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24733885</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Sep 27;108(39):16463-8</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21911370</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2009;47:423-45</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19400641</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Dec 10;110(50):20117-22</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24277808</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2005;43:395-436</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16078890</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Plant Cell Physiol. 2008 Nov;49(11):1747-51</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18842596</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Plant Cell. 2006 Jan;18(1):243-56</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16326930</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mol Ecol. 2004 Dec;13(12):3809-19</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15548293</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Exp Bot. 2010 Jun;61(10 ):2589-601</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20378666</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 Sep;71(9):5544-50</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16151147</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Science. 2001 Jan 5;291(5501):118-20</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11141561</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Nature. 2006 Nov 16;444(7117):323-9</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17108957</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2005;43:205-27</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16078883</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Nat Biotechnol. 2011 May 15;29(7):644-52</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21572440</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Environ Microbiol. 2014 Dec;16(12):3730-42</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">25186788</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Nat Rev Genet. 2010 Aug;11(8):539-48</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20585331</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>EMBO J. 1997 Apr 15;16(8):1934-42</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">9155019</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Nat Genet. 2015 Apr;47(4):410-5</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">25706625</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Cell Microbiol. 2011 Dec;13(12):1849-57</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21848815</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2015 Jun;28(6):689-700</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">25650830</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Oct 22;110(43):17594-9</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24101475</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Cell. 2010 Jul 23;142(2):284-95</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20655469</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Cell. 2006 Feb 24;124(4):803-14</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16497589</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2015;66:513-45</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">25923844</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Trends Cell Biol. 2001 Feb;11(2):82-8</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11166216</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mycorrhiza. 2011 Apr;21(3):145-54</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20512595</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2014 Apr;202(1):270-86</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24383411</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Cell Microbiol. 2011 Dec;13(12):1839-48</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21819515</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Nature. 2008 Mar 6;452(7183):88-92</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18322534</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2009;183(2):365-79</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19453435</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2005 Jul;18(7):659-73</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16042012</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2015 Mar;28(3):261-73</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">25338146</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2005 Feb;165(2):599-611</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15720670</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Virulence. 2014;5(7):722-32</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">25513773</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Curr Biol. 2011 Jul 26;21(14):1197-203</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21757352</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jun 3;111(22):8299-304</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24847068</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference></ReferenceList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Bois/explor/MycorrhizaeV1/Data/Main/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000F20 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000F20 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Bois
|area= MycorrhizaeV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:27736883
|texte= Metatranscriptomic Study of Common and Host-Specific Patterns of Gene Expression between Pines and Their Symbiotic Ectomycorrhizal Fungi in the Genus Suillus.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:27736883" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a MycorrhizaeV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.37. |  |