MycorrhizaeV1, Main, Corpus, bibRecord, 000356

Mycorrhizal response in crop versus wild plants.

Identifieur interne : 000356 ( Main/Corpus ); précédent : 000355; suivant : 000357

Mycorrhizal response in crop versus wild plants.

Auteurs : Vasilis Kokkoris ; Chantal Hamel ; Miranda M. Hart

Source :

PloS one [ 1932-6203 ] ; 2019.

RBID : pubmed:31393956

English descriptors

KwdEn :
- Biomass (MeSH), Crops, Agricultural (microbiology), Glomeromycota (physiology), Mycelium (physiology), Mycorrhizae (physiology), Plant Shoots (microbiology), Spores, Fungal (physiology).
MESH :
- microbiology : Crops, Agricultural, Plant Shoots.
- physiology : Glomeromycota, Mycelium, Mycorrhizae, Spores, Fungal.
- Biomass.

Abstract

We proposed a theoretical framework predicting mutualistic outcomes for the arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) symbiosis based on host provenance (crop versus wild). To test the framework, we grew two isolates of Rhizoglomus irregulare (commercial versus an isolate locally isolated), with five crop plants and five wild plants endemic to the region that co-occur with the locally sourced fungus. While inoculation with either isolate had no effect on plant biomass, it decreased leaf P content, particularly for wild plants. All plants associating with the commercial fungus had lower leaf P. Overall, our data shows that wild plants may be more sensitive to differences in mutualistic quality among fungal isolates.

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221037
PubMed: 31393956
PubMed Central: PMC6687160

Links to Exploration step

pubmed:31393956

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Mycorrhizal response in crop versus wild plants.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Kokkoris, Vasilis" sort="Kokkoris, Vasilis" uniqKey="Kokkoris V" first="Vasilis" last="Kokkoris">Vasilis Kokkoris</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Biology, University of British Columbia, Okanagan campus, Kelowna, BC, Canada.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Hamel, Chantal" sort="Hamel, Chantal" uniqKey="Hamel C" first="Chantal" last="Hamel">Chantal Hamel</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Quebec Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Quebec, QC, Canada.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Hart, Miranda M" sort="Hart, Miranda M" uniqKey="Hart M" first="Miranda M" last="Hart">Miranda M. Hart</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Biology, University of British Columbia, Okanagan campus, Kelowna, BC, Canada.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2019">2019</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:31393956</idno>
<idno type="pmid">31393956</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0221037</idno>
<idno type="pmc">PMC6687160</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">000356</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000356</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Mycorrhizal response in crop versus wild plants.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Kokkoris, Vasilis" sort="Kokkoris, Vasilis" uniqKey="Kokkoris V" first="Vasilis" last="Kokkoris">Vasilis Kokkoris</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Biology, University of British Columbia, Okanagan campus, Kelowna, BC, Canada.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Hamel, Chantal" sort="Hamel, Chantal" uniqKey="Hamel C" first="Chantal" last="Hamel">Chantal Hamel</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Quebec Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Quebec, QC, Canada.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Hart, Miranda M" sort="Hart, Miranda M" uniqKey="Hart M" first="Miranda M" last="Hart">Miranda M. Hart</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Biology, University of British Columbia, Okanagan campus, Kelowna, BC, Canada.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j">PloS one</title>
<idno type="eISSN">1932-6203</idno>
<imprint><date when="2019" type="published">2019</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Biomass (MeSH)</term>
<term>Crops, Agricultural (microbiology)</term>
<term>Glomeromycota (physiology)</term>
<term>Mycelium (physiology)</term>
<term>Mycorrhizae (physiology)</term>
<term>Plant Shoots (microbiology)</term>
<term>Spores, Fungal (physiology)</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="microbiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Crops, Agricultural</term>
<term>Plant Shoots</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Glomeromycota</term>
<term>Mycelium</term>
<term>Mycorrhizae</term>
<term>Spores, Fungal</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Biomass</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">We proposed a theoretical framework predicting mutualistic outcomes for the arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) symbiosis based on host provenance (crop versus wild). To test the framework, we grew two isolates of Rhizoglomus irregulare (commercial versus an isolate locally isolated), with five crop plants and five wild plants endemic to the region that co-occur with the locally sourced fungus. While inoculation with either isolate had no effect on plant biomass, it decreased leaf P content, particularly for wild plants. All plants associating with the commercial fungus had lower leaf P. Overall, our data shows that wild plants may be more sensitive to differences in mutualistic quality among fungal isolates.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">31393956</PMID>
<DateCompleted><Year>2020</Year>
<Month>03</Month>
<Day>10</Day>
</DateCompleted>
<DateRevised><Year>2020</Year>
<Month>03</Month>
<Day>10</Day>
</DateRevised>
<Article PubModel="Electronic-eCollection"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1932-6203</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>14</Volume>
<Issue>8</Issue>
<PubDate><Year>2019</Year>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>PloS one</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>PLoS One</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Mycorrhizal response in crop versus wild plants.</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination><MedlinePgn>e0221037</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1371/journal.pone.0221037</ELocationID>
<Abstract><AbstractText>We proposed a theoretical framework predicting mutualistic outcomes for the arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) symbiosis based on host provenance (crop versus wild). To test the framework, we grew two isolates of Rhizoglomus irregulare (commercial versus an isolate locally isolated), with five crop plants and five wild plants endemic to the region that co-occur with the locally sourced fungus. While inoculation with either isolate had no effect on plant biomass, it decreased leaf P content, particularly for wild plants. All plants associating with the commercial fungus had lower leaf P. Overall, our data shows that wild plants may be more sensitive to differences in mutualistic quality among fungal isolates.</AbstractText>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Kokkoris</LastName>
<ForeName>Vasilis</ForeName>
<Initials>V</Initials>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0002-1667-0493</Identifier>
<AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Biology, University of British Columbia, Okanagan campus, Kelowna, BC, Canada.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Hamel</LastName>
<ForeName>Chantal</ForeName>
<Initials>C</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Quebec Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Quebec, QC, Canada.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Hart</LastName>
<ForeName>Miranda M</ForeName>
<Initials>MM</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Biology, University of British Columbia, Okanagan campus, Kelowna, BC, Canada.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>eng</Language>
<PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
<ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2019</Year>
<Month>08</Month>
<Day>08</Day>
</ArticleDate>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country>
<MedlineTA>PLoS One</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>101285081</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>1932-6203</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
<CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset>
<MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D018533" MajorTopicYN="N">Biomass</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D018556" MajorTopicYN="N">Crops, Agricultural</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000382" MajorTopicYN="Y">microbiology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D055137" MajorTopicYN="N">Glomeromycota</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="N">physiology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D025282" MajorTopicYN="N">Mycelium</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="N">physiology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D038821" MajorTopicYN="N">Mycorrhizae</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="Y">physiology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D018520" MajorTopicYN="N">Plant Shoots</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000382" MajorTopicYN="N">microbiology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013172" MajorTopicYN="N">Spores, Fungal</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="N">physiology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
</MeshHeadingList>
<CoiStatement>The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.</CoiStatement>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2019</Year>
<Month>02</Month>
<Day>12</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2019</Year>
<Month>07</Month>
<Day>29</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2019</Year>
<Month>8</Month>
<Day>9</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2019</Year>
<Month>8</Month>
<Day>9</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2020</Year>
<Month>3</Month>
<Day>11</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>epublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">31393956</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0221037</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pii">PONE-D-19-04246</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC6687160</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
<ReferenceList><Reference><Citation>Mycorrhiza. 2004 Aug;14(4):263-9</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12942358</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Feb 24;101(8):2369-74</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">14983016</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2005 Sep;167(3):881-96</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16101924</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2005 Oct;168(1):189-204</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16159333</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2005 Nov;168(2):445-54</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16219083</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Plant Physiol. 1983 Dec;73(4):969-72</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16663353</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Ecol Lett. 2006 Feb;9(2):103-10</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16958874</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Mycorrhiza. 2007 Jul;17(5):469-474</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17318595</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Mycorrhiza. 2007 Dec;18(1):51-56</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17938974</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2008;178(4):852-62</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18346106</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2008;180(2):452-65</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18643898</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2008;180(3):564-8</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18684159</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2009 Mar;181(4):938-49</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19140934</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2009;182(2):347-58</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19207688</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2009;183(4):1176-87</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19496945</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2009 Oct;184(2):412-23</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19674324</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2009 Dec;184(4):962-74</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19754635</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Feb 2;107(5):2093-8</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20133855</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2010 Mar;185(4):1050-61</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20356347</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2011 Jan;189(2):507-14</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20880038</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Am J Bot. 1998 Dec;85(12):1732-8</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21680333</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Science. 2011 Aug 12;333(6044):880-2</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21836016</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Mar 22;279(1731):1122-30</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21920983</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Mycorrhiza. 2014 Feb;24(2):121-9</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">23942749</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>PLoS One. 2013 Aug 07;8(8):e70633</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">23950975</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Mol Ecol. 2014 Mar;23(6):1584-93</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24050702</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>ISME J. 2015 May;9(5):1053-61</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">25350159</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Mycorrhiza. 2016 Apr;26(3):209-14</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">26403242</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Mycobiology. 2015 Dec;43(4):444-9</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">26839504</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>BMC Evol Biol. 2016 Jun 10;16(1):122</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">27287440</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Front Microbiol. 2016 May 25;7:720</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">27303367</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2017 May;214(3):1330-1337</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28186629</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Oecologia. 1995 Jul;103(1):17-23</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28306940</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Ecology. 2017 Aug;98(8):2111-2119</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28500779</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Science. 2017 Jun 16;356(6343):1175-1178</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28596311</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Elife. 2017 Jul 20;6:</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28726631</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
</ReferenceList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Bois/explor/MycorrhizaeV1/Data/Main/Corpus

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000356 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000356 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Bois
   |area=    MycorrhizaeV1
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     pubmed:31393956
   |texte=   Mycorrhizal response in crop versus wild plants.
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:31393956" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a MycorrhizaeV1

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.37.
Data generation: Wed Nov 18 15:34:48 2020. Site generation: Wed Nov 18 15:41:10 2020

	Serveur d'exploration sur la mycorhize
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur la mycorhize

Mycorrhizal response in crop versus wild plants.

Mycorrhizal response in crop versus wild plants.

Source :

English descriptors

Abstract

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

Pour générer des pages wiki