Different wheat cultivars exhibit variable responses to inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi from organic and conventional farms.
Identifieur interne : 000091 ( Main/Corpus ); précédent : 000090; suivant : 000092Different wheat cultivars exhibit variable responses to inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi from organic and conventional farms.
Auteurs : David García De Le N ; Tanel Vahter ; Martin Zobel ; Mati Koppel ; Liina Edesi ; John Davison ; Saleh Al-Quraishy ; Wael N. Hozzein ; Mari Moora ; Jane Oja ; Martti Vasar ; Maarja ÖpikSource :
- PloS one [ 1932-6203 ] ; 2020.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- chemical : Soil.
- anatomy & histology : Triticum.
- growth & development : Triticum.
- microbiology : Triticum.
- physiology : Mycorrhizae, Plant Roots, Plant Shoots.
- Farms, Organic Agriculture, Soil Microbiology.
Abstract
The present study aimed to investigate the effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungal communities originating from organic and conventional agriculture on wheat growth and yield. Six different spring wheat cultivars released in different years in north and central European countries were considered. We hypothesised that AM fungal inoculum collected from organic agricultural fields would elicit a greater positive growth response than inoculum collected from conventional agricultural fields; and that older cultivars, which were developed under conditions of low fertilizer input, would exhibit overall greater growth responses to the presence of AM fungi, compared with more recent cultivars, and that AM fungal inoculum from conventional fields might have the most beneficial effect on the growth and yield of recent cultivars. The results showed that the overall effects on the growth and yield of spring wheat grown with organic and conventional AM fungal inocula did not differ greatly. However, the inoculation growth response, showing the difference of the effects of organic and conventional inocula, varied between particular wheat cultivars. Inoculation growth response of the cultivar Pikker (released in 1959) was the most positive, while that of the cultivar Arabella (released in 2012) was the most negative. The use of AM fungal inoculum from organic fields resulted in slightly taller plant individuals. Pikker showed relatively higher yield and stronger growth when the organic AM fungal inoculum was used. Arabella exhibited relatively lower yield and weaker growth when the organic inoculum was used. Whether the positive response of Pikker to Estonian organic inoculation reflects adaptation to the locally occurring AM fungal community needs to be established by further studies of the communities of AM fungi colonizing wheat roots.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233878
PubMed: 32470094
PubMed Central: PMC7259642
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:32470094Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Different wheat cultivars exhibit variable responses to inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi from organic and conventional farms.</title><author><name sortKey="Garcia De Le N, David" sort="Garcia De Le N, David" uniqKey="Garcia De Le N D" first="David" last="García De Le N">David García De Le N</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Life Sciences, Technological Science Campus, University of Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, Spain.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Vahter, Tanel" sort="Vahter, Tanel" uniqKey="Vahter T" first="Tanel" last="Vahter">Tanel Vahter</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Zobel, Martin" sort="Zobel, Martin" uniqKey="Zobel M" first="Martin" last="Zobel">Martin Zobel</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Zoology Department, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Botany, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Koppel, Mati" sort="Koppel, Mati" uniqKey="Koppel M" first="Mati" last="Koppel">Mati Koppel</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Estonian Crop Research Institute, Jõgeva, Estonia.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Edesi, Liina" sort="Edesi, Liina" uniqKey="Edesi L" first="Liina" last="Edesi">Liina Edesi</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Estonian Crop Research Institute, Jõgeva, Estonia.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Davison, John" sort="Davison, John" uniqKey="Davison J" first="John" last="Davison">John Davison</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Al Quraishy, Saleh" sort="Al Quraishy, Saleh" uniqKey="Al Quraishy S" first="Saleh" last="Al-Quraishy">Saleh Al-Quraishy</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Zoology Department, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Hozzein, Wael N" sort="Hozzein, Wael N" uniqKey="Hozzein W" first="Wael N" last="Hozzein">Wael N. Hozzein</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Zoology Department, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Botany and Microbiology Department, Faculty of Science, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef, Egypt.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Moora, Mari" sort="Moora, Mari" uniqKey="Moora M" first="Mari" last="Moora">Mari Moora</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Oja, Jane" sort="Oja, Jane" uniqKey="Oja J" first="Jane" last="Oja">Jane Oja</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Vasar, Martti" sort="Vasar, Martti" uniqKey="Vasar M" first="Martti" last="Vasar">Martti Vasar</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Opik, Maarja" sort="Opik, Maarja" uniqKey="Opik M" first="Maarja" last="Öpik">Maarja Öpik</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2020">2020</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:32470094</idno><idno type="pmid">32470094</idno><idno type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0233878</idno><idno type="pmc">PMC7259642</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">000091</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000091</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Different wheat cultivars exhibit variable responses to inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi from organic and conventional farms.</title><author><name sortKey="Garcia De Le N, David" sort="Garcia De Le N, David" uniqKey="Garcia De Le N D" first="David" last="García De Le N">David García De Le N</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Life Sciences, Technological Science Campus, University of Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, Spain.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Vahter, Tanel" sort="Vahter, Tanel" uniqKey="Vahter T" first="Tanel" last="Vahter">Tanel Vahter</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Zobel, Martin" sort="Zobel, Martin" uniqKey="Zobel M" first="Martin" last="Zobel">Martin Zobel</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Zoology Department, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Botany, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Koppel, Mati" sort="Koppel, Mati" uniqKey="Koppel M" first="Mati" last="Koppel">Mati Koppel</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Estonian Crop Research Institute, Jõgeva, Estonia.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Edesi, Liina" sort="Edesi, Liina" uniqKey="Edesi L" first="Liina" last="Edesi">Liina Edesi</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Estonian Crop Research Institute, Jõgeva, Estonia.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Davison, John" sort="Davison, John" uniqKey="Davison J" first="John" last="Davison">John Davison</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Al Quraishy, Saleh" sort="Al Quraishy, Saleh" uniqKey="Al Quraishy S" first="Saleh" last="Al-Quraishy">Saleh Al-Quraishy</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Zoology Department, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Hozzein, Wael N" sort="Hozzein, Wael N" uniqKey="Hozzein W" first="Wael N" last="Hozzein">Wael N. Hozzein</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Zoology Department, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Botany and Microbiology Department, Faculty of Science, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef, Egypt.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Moora, Mari" sort="Moora, Mari" uniqKey="Moora M" first="Mari" last="Moora">Mari Moora</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Oja, Jane" sort="Oja, Jane" uniqKey="Oja J" first="Jane" last="Oja">Jane Oja</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Vasar, Martti" sort="Vasar, Martti" uniqKey="Vasar M" first="Martti" last="Vasar">Martti Vasar</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Opik, Maarja" sort="Opik, Maarja" uniqKey="Opik M" first="Maarja" last="Öpik">Maarja Öpik</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">PloS one</title><idno type="eISSN">1932-6203</idno><imprint><date when="2020" type="published">2020</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Farms (MeSH)</term><term>Mycorrhizae (physiology)</term><term>Organic Agriculture (MeSH)</term><term>Plant Roots (physiology)</term><term>Plant Shoots (physiology)</term><term>Soil (MeSH)</term><term>Soil Microbiology (MeSH)</term><term>Triticum (anatomy & histology)</term><term>Triticum (growth & development)</term><term>Triticum (microbiology)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Soil</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="anatomy & histology" xml:lang="en"><term>Triticum</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="growth & development" xml:lang="en"><term>Triticum</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="microbiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Triticum</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Mycorrhizae</term><term>Plant Roots</term><term>Plant Shoots</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Farms</term><term>Organic Agriculture</term><term>Soil Microbiology</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The present study aimed to investigate the effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungal communities originating from organic and conventional agriculture on wheat growth and yield. Six different spring wheat cultivars released in different years in north and central European countries were considered. We hypothesised that AM fungal inoculum collected from organic agricultural fields would elicit a greater positive growth response than inoculum collected from conventional agricultural fields; and that older cultivars, which were developed under conditions of low fertilizer input, would exhibit overall greater growth responses to the presence of AM fungi, compared with more recent cultivars, and that AM fungal inoculum from conventional fields might have the most beneficial effect on the growth and yield of recent cultivars. The results showed that the overall effects on the growth and yield of spring wheat grown with organic and conventional AM fungal inocula did not differ greatly. However, the inoculation growth response, showing the difference of the effects of organic and conventional inocula, varied between particular wheat cultivars. Inoculation growth response of the cultivar Pikker (released in 1959) was the most positive, while that of the cultivar Arabella (released in 2012) was the most negative. The use of AM fungal inoculum from organic fields resulted in slightly taller plant individuals. Pikker showed relatively higher yield and stronger growth when the organic AM fungal inoculum was used. Arabella exhibited relatively lower yield and weaker growth when the organic inoculum was used. Whether the positive response of Pikker to Estonian organic inoculation reflects adaptation to the locally occurring AM fungal community needs to be established by further studies of the communities of AM fungi colonizing wheat roots.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">32470094</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2020</Year><Month>08</Month><Day>17</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2020</Year><Month>08</Month><Day>17</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Electronic-eCollection"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1932-6203</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>15</Volume><Issue>5</Issue><PubDate><Year>2020</Year></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>PloS one</Title><ISOAbbreviation>PLoS One</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Different wheat cultivars exhibit variable responses to inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi from organic and conventional farms.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>e0233878</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1371/journal.pone.0233878</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>The present study aimed to investigate the effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungal communities originating from organic and conventional agriculture on wheat growth and yield. Six different spring wheat cultivars released in different years in north and central European countries were considered. We hypothesised that AM fungal inoculum collected from organic agricultural fields would elicit a greater positive growth response than inoculum collected from conventional agricultural fields; and that older cultivars, which were developed under conditions of low fertilizer input, would exhibit overall greater growth responses to the presence of AM fungi, compared with more recent cultivars, and that AM fungal inoculum from conventional fields might have the most beneficial effect on the growth and yield of recent cultivars. The results showed that the overall effects on the growth and yield of spring wheat grown with organic and conventional AM fungal inocula did not differ greatly. However, the inoculation growth response, showing the difference of the effects of organic and conventional inocula, varied between particular wheat cultivars. Inoculation growth response of the cultivar Pikker (released in 1959) was the most positive, while that of the cultivar Arabella (released in 2012) was the most negative. The use of AM fungal inoculum from organic fields resulted in slightly taller plant individuals. Pikker showed relatively higher yield and stronger growth when the organic AM fungal inoculum was used. Arabella exhibited relatively lower yield and weaker growth when the organic inoculum was used. Whether the positive response of Pikker to Estonian organic inoculation reflects adaptation to the locally occurring AM fungal community needs to be established by further studies of the communities of AM fungi colonizing wheat roots.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>García de León</LastName><ForeName>David</ForeName><Initials>D</Initials><Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0001-8165-6965</Identifier><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Life Sciences, Technological Science Campus, University of Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, Spain.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Vahter</LastName><ForeName>Tanel</ForeName><Initials>T</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Zobel</LastName><ForeName>Martin</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Zoology Department, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Botany, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Koppel</LastName><ForeName>Mati</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Estonian Crop Research Institute, Jõgeva, Estonia.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Edesi</LastName><ForeName>Liina</ForeName><Initials>L</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Estonian Crop Research Institute, Jõgeva, Estonia.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Davison</LastName><ForeName>John</ForeName><Initials>J</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Al-Quraishy</LastName><ForeName>Saleh</ForeName><Initials>S</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Zoology Department, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Hozzein</LastName><ForeName>Wael N</ForeName><Initials>WN</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Zoology Department, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Botany and Microbiology Department, Faculty of Science, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef, Egypt.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Moora</LastName><ForeName>Mari</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Oja</LastName><ForeName>Jane</ForeName><Initials>J</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Vasar</LastName><ForeName>Martti</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Öpik</LastName><ForeName>Maarja</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2020</Year><Month>05</Month><Day>29</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>PLoS One</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>101285081</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1932-6203</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D012987">Soil</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000072480" MajorTopicYN="Y">Farms</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D038821" MajorTopicYN="N">Mycorrhizae</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="Y">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D058871" MajorTopicYN="Y">Organic Agriculture</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D018517" MajorTopicYN="N">Plant Roots</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="N">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D018520" MajorTopicYN="N">Plant Shoots</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="N">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012987" MajorTopicYN="N">Soil</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012988" MajorTopicYN="N">Soil Microbiology</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014908" MajorTopicYN="N">Triticum</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000033" MajorTopicYN="N">anatomy & histology</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000254" MajorTopicYN="Y">growth & development</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000382" MajorTopicYN="Y">microbiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList><CoiStatement>The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.</CoiStatement></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2020</Year><Month>04</Month><Day>14</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2020</Year><Month>05</Month><Day>13</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2020</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>30</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2020</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>30</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2020</Year><Month>8</Month><Day>18</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>epublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">32470094</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0233878</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">PONE-D-20-10701</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC7259642</ArticleId></ArticleIdList><ReferenceList><Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2010 Jun;186(4):968-79</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20345633</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Trends Plant Sci. 2015 May;20(5):283-290</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">25840500</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mycorrhiza. 2017 Nov;27(8):761-773</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28730541</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2008 Aug;65(2):339-49</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18631176</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2019 Apr;222(1):543-555</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">30372522</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2006;172(3):536-43</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17083683</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2011 May;190(3):794-804</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21294738</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mycorrhiza. 2010 Nov;20(8):519-30</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20697748</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Trends Ecol Evol. 2016 Jun;31(6):440-452</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">26993667</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Front Plant Sci. 2016 Oct 27;7:1625</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">27833637</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2010 Oct;188(1):223-41</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20561207</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2018 Feb;217(3):1254-1266</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">29034978</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Bioinformatics. 2011 Nov 1;27(21):2957-63</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21903629</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Ecol Lett. 2008 Mar;11(3):296-310</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18047587</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2019 Jul;223(2):517-519</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">30761543</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Glob Chang Biol. 2020 Mar;26(3):1725-1738</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">31645088</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>PeerJ. 2016 Oct 18;4:e2584</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">27781170</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2014 Dec;90(3):609-21</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">25187481</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2018 Dec;220(4):1135-1140</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">29658105</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mycologia. 2016 Sep;108(5):1028-1046</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">27738200</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001 Feb;67(2):495-8</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11157208</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>BMC Evol Biol. 2016 Jun 10;16(1):122</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">27287440</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Chem Ecol. 2012 Jun;38(6):651-64</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22623151</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Science. 2015 Aug 28;349(6251):970-3</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">26315436</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>BMC Bioinformatics. 2009 Dec 15;10:421</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20003500</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>ISME J. 2019 Jul;13(7):1722-1736</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">30850707</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference></ReferenceList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Bois/explor/MycorrhizaeV1/Data/Main/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000091 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000091 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Bois
|area= MycorrhizaeV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:32470094
|texte= Different wheat cultivars exhibit variable responses to inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi from organic and conventional farms.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:32470094" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a MycorrhizaeV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.37. |  |