Serveur d'exploration sur le chêne en Belgique

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Preserving ecosystem services in urban regions: Challenges for planning and best practice examples from Switzerland

Identifieur interne : 000205 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 000204; suivant : 000206

Preserving ecosystem services in urban regions: Challenges for planning and best practice examples from Switzerland

Auteurs : Silvia Tobias [Suisse]

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:099B119F6E0B900E6A86ABA6AA153FED40CAE672

English descriptors

Abstract

This article presents a literature review that explores the challenges for planning in urban regions in connection with the preservation of ecosystem services. It further presents some best practice examples for meeting these challenges. The demand for the provision of ecosystem services within urban regions changed during the transition from a largely agrarian society to an industrial society and, most recently, to a service society. Although in the past, provisioning services such as food production or the provision of raw material were decisive for urban development, today cultural services, e.g., clear views or nearby recreation areas, have become increasingly important. According to the literature, soil sealing is the greatest threat urbanization poses toward ecosystem services, as it compromises all of them. Spatially extensive cities with a high building density particularly inhibit regulating services like the regulation of temperature or water surface runoff. Conversely, scattered settlement patterns may lead to very small remnants of open space that cannot reasonably serve as natural habitat, agricultural land, or recreation area. The challenges for planning in urban regions are: 1) specifying regulations that define outer limits to the development of each settlement unit, 2) comprehensive planning with focal points for development, and limiting access and development at other places, and 3) compensating for new soil sealing by restoring nearby sealed areas. The article presents 3 best‐practice examples that support these principles: designating areas with a particular soil quality that should not be built over, offering incentives for corporate planning in urban regions, and restoring a country road in connection with a motorway construction. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2013; 9: 243–251. © 2013 SETAC

Url:
DOI: 10.1002/ieam.1392


Affiliations:


Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Preserving ecosystem services in urban regions: Challenges for planning and best practice examples from Switzerland</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Tobias, Silvia" sort="Tobias, Silvia" uniqKey="Tobias S" first="Silvia" last="Tobias">Silvia Tobias</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:099B119F6E0B900E6A86ABA6AA153FED40CAE672</idno>
<date when="2013" year="2013">2013</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1002/ieam.1392</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/099B119F6E0B900E6A86ABA6AA153FED40CAE672/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000D16</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000D16</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">000D11</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">000023</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000023</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">1551-3777:2013:Tobias S:preserving:ecosystem:services</idno>
<idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno>
<idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3664025</idno>
<idno type="RBID">PMC:3664025</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">000186</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PMC">000186</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Curation">000186</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Curation">000186</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Checkpoint">000129</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000129</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">000145</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Curation">000145</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Checkpoint">000145</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">1551-3777:2013:Tobias S:preserving:ecosystem:services</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">000205</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000205</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">000205</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Preserving ecosystem services in urban regions: Challenges for planning and best practice examples from Switzerland</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Tobias, Silvia" sort="Tobias, Silvia" uniqKey="Tobias S" first="Silvia" last="Tobias">Silvia Tobias</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<country xml:lang="fr">Suisse</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Swiss Federal Institute of Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL, Landscape Ecology Group, Zürcherstrasse 111, CH‐8903 Birmensdorf</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>CH‐8903 Birmensdorf</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<country xml:lang="fr">Suisse</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Swiss Federal Institute of Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL, Landscape Ecology Group, Zürcherstrasse 111, CH‐8903 Birmensdorf</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>CH‐8903 Birmensdorf</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j">Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management</title>
<title level="j" type="abbrev">Integr Environ Assess Manag</title>
<idno type="ISSN">1551-3777</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1551-3793</idno>
<imprint>
<publisher>John Wiley & Sons, Inc.</publisher>
<pubPlace>Hoboken, USA</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2013-04">2013-04</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">9</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="243">243</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="251">251</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">1551-3777</idno>
</series>
<idno type="istex">099B119F6E0B900E6A86ABA6AA153FED40CAE672</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.1002/ieam.1392</idno>
<idno type="ArticleID">IEAM1392</idno>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">1551-3777</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Best‐practice examples</term>
<term>Ecosystem services</term>
<term>Land use planning</term>
<term>Soil sealing</term>
<term>Urban fringe</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<langUsage>
<language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">This article presents a literature review that explores the challenges for planning in urban regions in connection with the preservation of ecosystem services. It further presents some best practice examples for meeting these challenges. The demand for the provision of ecosystem services within urban regions changed during the transition from a largely agrarian society to an industrial society and, most recently, to a service society. Although in the past, provisioning services such as food production or the provision of raw material were decisive for urban development, today cultural services, e.g., clear views or nearby recreation areas, have become increasingly important. According to the literature, soil sealing is the greatest threat urbanization poses toward ecosystem services, as it compromises all of them. Spatially extensive cities with a high building density particularly inhibit regulating services like the regulation of temperature or water surface runoff. Conversely, scattered settlement patterns may lead to very small remnants of open space that cannot reasonably serve as natural habitat, agricultural land, or recreation area. The challenges for planning in urban regions are: 1) specifying regulations that define outer limits to the development of each settlement unit, 2) comprehensive planning with focal points for development, and limiting access and development at other places, and 3) compensating for new soil sealing by restoring nearby sealed areas. The article presents 3 best‐practice examples that support these principles: designating areas with a particular soil quality that should not be built over, offering incentives for corporate planning in urban regions, and restoring a country road in connection with a motorway construction. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2013; 9: 243–251. © 2013 SETAC</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<affiliations>
<list>
<country>
<li>Suisse</li>
</country>
</list>
<tree>
<country name="Suisse">
<noRegion>
<name sortKey="Tobias, Silvia" sort="Tobias, Silvia" uniqKey="Tobias S" first="Silvia" last="Tobias">Silvia Tobias</name>
</noRegion>
<name sortKey="Tobias, Silvia" sort="Tobias, Silvia" uniqKey="Tobias S" first="Silvia" last="Tobias">Silvia Tobias</name>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Bois/explor/CheneBelgiqueV2/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000205 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 000205 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Bois
   |area=    CheneBelgiqueV2
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Exploration
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:099B119F6E0B900E6A86ABA6AA153FED40CAE672
   |texte=   Preserving ecosystem services in urban regions: Challenges for planning and best practice examples from Switzerland
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.27.
Data generation: Wed Mar 22 20:06:11 2017. Site generation: Wed Mar 6 16:09:04 2024