Ecological differentiation between the Sardinian endemic Maniola nurag and the pan‐European M. jurtina
Identifieur interne : 000773 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000772; suivant : 000774Ecological differentiation between the Sardinian endemic Maniola nurag and the pan‐European M. jurtina
Auteurs : Andrea Grill ; Nicolas Schtickzelle ; Daniel F. R. Cleary ; Gabriel Nève ; Steph B. J. MenkenSource :
- Biological Journal of the Linnean Society [ 0024-4066 ] ; 2006-12.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
Recently refined evolutionary theories have highlighted that ecological interactions and environmental gradients can play a major role in speciation. This paper reports on a 3‐year field study, in which the ecology of two congeneric butterfly species was used to explore and compare the environmental factors determining their spatial distribution. These data are discussed in the context of possible speciation scenarios between the Sardinian populations of Maniola nurag and M. jurtina. M. nurag is endemic to the island of Sardinia, while M. jurtina is widespread over Europe. In Sardinia, the two species are locally sympatric. Mark–release–recapture experiments were combined with measures of environmental variables in 15 1‐ha plots, established in areas of potential habitat for the butterflies. Constrained linear models were parameterized from mark–recapture data to estimate both individual (survival and capture probabilities) and population (population size and recruitment) parameters. The two species had similar demography, movement patterns, life history, and behaviour. Population sizes developed in a parabolic fashion from beginning to end of the flight season. Differences included local population size, adult phenology, and habitat requirements. Long‐distance movements larger than 1.5 km were observed, suggesting a substantial amount of gene‐flow between populations of the endemic as well as the widespread species. Multivariate analyses revealed four main environmental gradients responsible for the abundance of the butterflies in an area. Both species responded similarly to environmental variables. However, each species’s abundance was correlated with a different environmental gradient determined by vegetation cover and structure. When sympatric, the two species responded to subtle differences in microhabitat structure. This might originally have induced their divergence. This study is an example of how empirical field data on population dynamics, dispersal, and habitat characteristics of two sympatric congeners can further our understanding of how species differentiate despite existing gene‐flow. © 2006 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2006, 89, 561–574.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2006.00683.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:B4E37B873A219BBE73E0172D866CE1479B30AFE1Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Ecological differentiation between the Sardinian endemic Maniola nurag and the pan‐European M. jurtina</title><author><name sortKey="Grill, Andrea" sort="Grill, Andrea" uniqKey="Grill A" first="Andrea" last="Grill">Andrea Grill</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 94766, NL‐1090 GT Amsterdam, the Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: grill@science.uva.nl</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Schtickzelle, Nicolas" sort="Schtickzelle, Nicolas" uniqKey="Schtickzelle N" first="Nicolas" last="Schtickzelle">Nicolas Schtickzelle</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Université Catholique de Louvain, Biodiversity Research Centre, Ecology and Biogeography, Croix du Sud 5, B‐1348 Louvain‐la‐Neuve, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Cleary, Daniel F R" sort="Cleary, Daniel F R" uniqKey="Cleary D" first="Daniel F. R." last="Cleary">Daniel F. R. Cleary</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 94766, NL‐1090 GT Amsterdam, the Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>National Museum of Natural History Naturalis, PO Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, the Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Neve, Gabriel" sort="Neve, Gabriel" uniqKey="Neve G" first="Gabriel" last="Nève">Gabriel Nève</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>EA Evolution Génome Environnement, Case 36, Université de Provence, 3 Place Victor Hugo, F‐13331 Marseille Cedex 3, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Menken, Steph B J" sort="Menken, Steph B J" uniqKey="Menken S" first="Steph B. J." last="Menken">Steph B. J. Menken</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 94766, NL‐1090 GT Amsterdam, the Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:B4E37B873A219BBE73E0172D866CE1479B30AFE1</idno><date when="2006" year="2006">2006</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1095-8312.2006.00683.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/B4E37B873A219BBE73E0172D866CE1479B30AFE1/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000773</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000773</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Ecological differentiation between the Sardinian endemic Maniola nurag and the pan‐European M. jurtina</title><author><name sortKey="Grill, Andrea" sort="Grill, Andrea" uniqKey="Grill A" first="Andrea" last="Grill">Andrea Grill</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 94766, NL‐1090 GT Amsterdam, the Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: grill@science.uva.nl</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Schtickzelle, Nicolas" sort="Schtickzelle, Nicolas" uniqKey="Schtickzelle N" first="Nicolas" last="Schtickzelle">Nicolas Schtickzelle</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Université Catholique de Louvain, Biodiversity Research Centre, Ecology and Biogeography, Croix du Sud 5, B‐1348 Louvain‐la‐Neuve, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Cleary, Daniel F R" sort="Cleary, Daniel F R" uniqKey="Cleary D" first="Daniel F. R." last="Cleary">Daniel F. R. Cleary</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 94766, NL‐1090 GT Amsterdam, the Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>National Museum of Natural History Naturalis, PO Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, the Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Neve, Gabriel" sort="Neve, Gabriel" uniqKey="Neve G" first="Gabriel" last="Nève">Gabriel Nève</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>EA Evolution Génome Environnement, Case 36, Université de Provence, 3 Place Victor Hugo, F‐13331 Marseille Cedex 3, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Menken, Steph B J" sort="Menken, Steph B J" uniqKey="Menken S" first="Steph B. J." last="Menken">Steph B. J. Menken</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 94766, NL‐1090 GT Amsterdam, the Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Biological Journal of the Linnean Society</title><idno type="ISSN">0024-4066</idno><idno type="eISSN">1095-8312</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2006-12">2006-12</date><biblScope unit="volume">89</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="561">561</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="574">574</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0024-4066</idno></series><idno type="istex">B4E37B873A219BBE73E0172D866CE1479B30AFE1</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1095-8312.2006.00683.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">BIJ683</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0024-4066</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Lepidoptera</term><term>Nymphalidae</term><term>aestivation</term><term>butterflies</term><term>demography</term><term>environmental gradients</term><term>mark–release–recapture</term><term>movement</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Recently refined evolutionary theories have highlighted that ecological interactions and environmental gradients can play a major role in speciation. This paper reports on a 3‐year field study, in which the ecology of two congeneric butterfly species was used to explore and compare the environmental factors determining their spatial distribution. These data are discussed in the context of possible speciation scenarios between the Sardinian populations of Maniola nurag and M. jurtina. M. nurag is endemic to the island of Sardinia, while M. jurtina is widespread over Europe. In Sardinia, the two species are locally sympatric. Mark–release–recapture experiments were combined with measures of environmental variables in 15 1‐ha plots, established in areas of potential habitat for the butterflies. Constrained linear models were parameterized from mark–recapture data to estimate both individual (survival and capture probabilities) and population (population size and recruitment) parameters. The two species had similar demography, movement patterns, life history, and behaviour. Population sizes developed in a parabolic fashion from beginning to end of the flight season. Differences included local population size, adult phenology, and habitat requirements. Long‐distance movements larger than 1.5 km were observed, suggesting a substantial amount of gene‐flow between populations of the endemic as well as the widespread species. Multivariate analyses revealed four main environmental gradients responsible for the abundance of the butterflies in an area. Both species responded similarly to environmental variables. However, each species’s abundance was correlated with a different environmental gradient determined by vegetation cover and structure. When sympatric, the two species responded to subtle differences in microhabitat structure. This might originally have induced their divergence. This study is an example of how empirical field data on population dynamics, dispersal, and habitat characteristics of two sympatric congeners can further our understanding of how species differentiate despite existing gene‐flow. © 2006 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2006, 89, 561–574.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>ANDREA GRILL</name><affiliations><json:string>Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 94766, NL‐1090 GT Amsterdam, the Netherlands</json:string><json:string>E-mail: grill@science.uva.nl</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>NICOLAS SCHTICKZELLE</name><affiliations><json:string>Université Catholique de Louvain, Biodiversity Research Centre, Ecology and Biogeography, Croix du Sud 5, B‐1348 Louvain‐la‐Neuve, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>DANIEL F. R. CLEARY</name><affiliations><json:string>Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 94766, NL‐1090 GT Amsterdam, the Netherlands</json:string><json:string>National Museum of Natural History Naturalis, PO Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, the Netherlands</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>GABRIEL NÈVE</name><affiliations><json:string>EA Evolution Génome Environnement, Case 36, Université de Provence, 3 Place Victor Hugo, F‐13331 Marseille Cedex 3, France</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>STEPH B. J. MENKEN</name><affiliations><json:string>Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 94766, NL‐1090 GT Amsterdam, the Netherlands</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>aestivation</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>butterflies</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>demography</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>environmental gradients</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Lepidoptera</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>mark–release–recapture</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>movement</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Nymphalidae</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>BIJ683</json:string></articleId><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Recently refined evolutionary theories have highlighted that ecological interactions and environmental gradients can play a major role in speciation. This paper reports on a 3‐year field study, in which the ecology of two congeneric butterfly species was used to explore and compare the environmental factors determining their spatial distribution. These data are discussed in the context of possible speciation scenarios between the Sardinian populations of Maniola nurag and M. jurtina. M. nurag is endemic to the island of Sardinia, while M. jurtina is widespread over Europe. In Sardinia, the two species are locally sympatric. Mark–release–recapture experiments were combined with measures of environmental variables in 15 1‐ha plots, established in areas of potential habitat for the butterflies. Constrained linear models were parameterized from mark–recapture data to estimate both individual (survival and capture probabilities) and population (population size and recruitment) parameters. The two species had similar demography, movement patterns, life history, and behaviour. Population sizes developed in a parabolic fashion from beginning to end of the flight season. Differences included local population size, adult phenology, and habitat requirements. Long‐distance movements larger than 1.5 km were observed, suggesting a substantial amount of gene‐flow between populations of the endemic as well as the widespread species. Multivariate analyses revealed four main environmental gradients responsible for the abundance of the butterflies in an area. Both species responded similarly to environmental variables. However, each species’s abundance was correlated with a different environmental gradient determined by vegetation cover and structure. When sympatric, the two species responded to subtle differences in microhabitat structure. This might originally have induced their divergence. This study is an example of how empirical field data on population dynamics, dispersal, and habitat characteristics of two sympatric congeners can further our understanding of how species differentiate despite existing gene‐flow. © 2006 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2006, 89, 561–574.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>8.5</score><pdfVersion>1.4</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>595 x 782 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractCharCount>2236</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>7245</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>46582</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>14</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>303</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Ecological differentiation between the Sardinian endemic Maniola nurag and the pan‐European M. jurtina</title><refBibs><json:item><author><json:item><name>AN Arnason</name></json:item><json:item><name>CJ Schwarz</name></json:item></author><host><volume>46</volume><pages><last>168</last><first>157</first></pages><issue>Suppl.</issue><author></author><title>Bird Study</title></host><title>Using POPAN‐5 to analyse banding data</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M Baguette</name></json:item><json:item><name>N Schtickzelle</name></json:item></author><host><volume>40</volume><pages><last>412</last><first>404</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Applied Ecology</title></host><title>Local population dynamics are important to the conservation of metapopulations in highly fragmented landscapes</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>H Biermann</name></json:item></author><host><volume>28</volume><pages><last>287</last><first>277</first></pages><author></author><title>Atalanta</title></host><title>Tabellarische Übersicht über die Tagfalter der tyrrhenischen Inseln und des angrenzenden Festlandes</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>PM Brakefield</name></json:item></author><host><volume>42</volume><pages><last>266</last><first>259</first></pages><author></author><title>Heredity</title></host><title>Spot numbers in Maniola jurtina– variation between generations and selection in marginal populations</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>PM Brakefield</name></json:item></author><host><volume>51</volume><pages><last>738</last><first>727</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Animal Ecology</title></host><title>Ecological studies on the butterfly Maniola jurtina in Britain. II. Population dynamics: the present position</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Burnham KP, Anderson DR. 1998. Model selection and inference. New York: Springer Verlag.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>GL Bush</name></json:item></author><host><volume>23</volume><pages><last>251</last><first>237</first></pages><author></author><title>Evolution</title></host><title>Sympatric host race formation and speciation in frugivorous flies of the genus Rhagoletis (Diptera, Tephitidae)</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>GL Bush</name></json:item></author><host><volume>9</volume><pages><last>288</last><first>285</first></pages><author></author><title>Trends in Ecology and Evolution</title></host><title>Sympatric speciation in animals: new wine in old bottles</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Programme R 4.0</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>P Casula</name></json:item><json:item><name>JD Nichols</name></json:item></author><host><volume>136</volume><pages><last>382</last><first>374</first></pages><author></author><title>Oecologia</title></host><title>Temporal variability of local abundance, sex ratio and activity in the Sardinian chalk hill blue butterfly</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>R Cianchi</name></json:item><json:item><name>A Ungaro</name></json:item><json:item><name>M Marini</name></json:item><json:item><name>L Bullini</name></json:item></author><host><volume>12</volume><pages><last>1471</last><first>1461</first></pages><author></author><title>Molecular Ecology</title></host><title>Differential patterns of hybridization and introgression between the swallowtails Papilio machaon and P. hospiton form Sardinia and Corsica islands (Lepidoptera, Papilionidae)</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M Cobolli</name></json:item><json:item><name>M Lucarelli</name></json:item><json:item><name>V Sbordoni</name></json:item></author><host><volume>8</volume><pages><last>582</last><first>569</first></pages><author></author><title>Biogeographia</title></host><title>Le farfalle diurne delle piccole isole circumsarde</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>L Conradt</name></json:item><json:item><name>EJ Bodsworth</name></json:item><json:item><name>TJ Roper</name></json:item><json:item><name>CD Thomas</name></json:item></author><host><volume>267</volume><pages><last>1510</last><first>1505</first></pages><author></author><title>Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Biological Sciences</title></host><title>Non‐random dispersal in the butterfly Maniola jurtina: implications for metapopulation models</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>L Conradt</name></json:item><json:item><name>TJ Roper</name></json:item><json:item><name>CD Thomas</name></json:item></author><host><volume>95</volume><pages><last>424</last><first>416</first></pages><author></author><title>Oikos</title></host><title>Dispersal behaviour of individuals in metapopulations of two British butterflies</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Darwin C. 1879. The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. London: John Murray.</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Dennis RLJ, Shreeve TG. 1996. Butterflies on British and Irish offshore islands: ecology and biogeography. Wallingford: Gem Publishing Co.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>RLH Dennis</name></json:item><json:item><name>TG Shreeve</name></json:item><json:item><name>A Olivier</name></json:item><json:item><name>JG Coutsis</name></json:item></author><host><volume>27</volume><pages><last>1383</last><first>1365</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Biogeography</title></host><title>Contemporary geography dominates butterfly diversity gradients within the Aegean archipelago (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae, Hesperioidea)</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>T Dobzhansky</name></json:item></author><host><volume>74</volume><pages><last>321</last><first>312</first></pages><author></author><title>American Naturalist</title></host><title>Speciation as a stage in evolutionary divergence</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M Doebeli</name></json:item><json:item><name>U Dieckmann</name></json:item></author><host><volume>156</volume><pages><last>101</last><first>77</first></pages><author></author><title>American Naturalist</title></host><title>Evolutionary branching and sympatric speciation caused by different types of ecological interactions</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M Doebeli</name></json:item><json:item><name>U Dieckmann</name></json:item></author><host><volume>421</volume><pages><last>264</last><first>259</first></pages><author></author><title>Nature</title></host><title>Speciation along environmental gradients</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>WH Dowdeswell</name></json:item></author><host><volume>16</volume><pages><last>52</last><first>39</first></pages><author></author><title>Heredity</title></host><title>Experimental studies on natural selection in the butterfly Maniola jurtina</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Dowdeswell WH. 1981. The life of the Meadow Brown. London: Heinemann Educational Books Ltd.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>I Emilianov</name></json:item><json:item><name>F Simpson</name></json:item><json:item><name>P Narang</name></json:item><json:item><name>J Mallet</name></json:item></author><host><volume>16</volume><pages><last>218</last><first>208</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Evolutionary Biology</title></host><title>Host choice promotes reproductive isolation between host races of the larch budmoth Zeiraphera diniana</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Ford EB. 1945. Butterflies. London: New Naturalist Series.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>DJ Futuyma</name></json:item><json:item><name>GC Mayer</name></json:item></author><host><volume>29</volume><pages><last>271</last><first>254</first></pages><author></author><title>Systematic Zoology</title></host><title>Non‐allopatric speciation in animals</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>E García‐Barros</name></json:item></author><host><volume>11</volume><pages><last>247</last><first>235</first></pages><author></author><title>Boletín de la Asociation Española de Entomología</title></host><title>Observaciones sobre la biología de Maniola jurtina (L., 1758) en el centro de la Península Ibérica: fenología general del ciclo biológico, duración del período de prepuesta y fecundidad potencial de las hembras (Lep. Nymphalidae)</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>D Goulson</name></json:item></author><host><volume>49</volume><pages><last>139</last><first>127</first></pages><author></author><title>Biological Journal of the Linnean Society</title></host><title>The evolutionary significance of bimodal emergence in the butterfly Maniola jurtina (Lepidoptera, Satyrinae) (L)</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Grant PR. 1998. Evolution on islands. Oxford: Oxford University Press.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>PR Grant</name></json:item><json:item><name>BR Grant</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>457</last><first>433</first></pages><author></author><title>Speciation and its consequences.</title></host><title>Sympatric speciation and Darwin’s finches</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>A Grill</name></json:item></author><host><volume>7</volume><pages><last>232</last><first>227</first></pages><author></author><title>Naturschutz- und Landschaftsplanung</title></host><title>Conservation parameters of the endemic Sardinian butterfly Maniola nurag</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Endemism in Sardinia: evolution, ecology and conservation in the butterfly Maniola nurag PhD Thesis.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>A Grill</name></json:item><json:item><name>R Crnjar</name></json:item><json:item><name>P Casula</name></json:item><json:item><name>SBJ Menken</name></json:item></author><host><volume>10</volume><pages><last>60</last><first>51</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal for Nature Conservation</title></host><title>Applying the IUCN threat categories to island endemics: Sardinian butterflies (Italy)</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>A Grill</name></json:item><json:item><name>R De Vos</name></json:item><json:item><name>J Van Arkel</name></json:item></author><host><volume>73</volume><pages><last>303</last><first>293</first></pages><author></author><title>Contributions to Zoology</title></host><title>The shape of endemics: Notes on male and female genitalia in the genus Maniola (Schrank, 1801), (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae, Satyrinae)</title></json:item><json:item><host><pages><last>827</last><first>812</first></pages><author></author><title>Hesselbarth H, Van Oorschot H, Wagener S. 1995. Die Tagfalter der Türkei, Bonn: Berger‐Juling Electronic Publishing, 812–827.</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Higgins LG, Riley ND. 1970. A field guide to the butterflies of Britain and Europe. London: Collins Publishers.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>GM Jolly</name></json:item></author><host><volume>52</volume><pages><last>247</last><first>225</first></pages><author></author><title>Biometrika</title></host><title>Explicit estimates from capture‐recapture data with both death and immigration‐stochastic model</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>D Jutzeler</name></json:item><json:item><name>G Leigheb</name></json:item><json:item><name>E De Bros</name></json:item></author><host><volume>4</volume><pages><last>149</last><first>143</first></pages><author></author><title>Linneana Belgica</title></host><title>Écologie, elevage et distribution du Myrtil de Sardaigne Maniola nurag (GHILIANI, 1852) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae, Satyridae)</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J Kleinekuhle</name></json:item></author><host><volume>16</volume><pages><last>60</last><first>1</first></pages><author></author><title>Oedippus</title></host><title>Die Tagfalter (Rhopalocera) Sardiniens aus biogeografischer Sicht</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>AS Kondrashov</name></json:item><json:item><name>FA Kondrashov</name></json:item></author><host><volume>400</volume><pages><last>354</last><first>351</first></pages><author></author><title>Nature</title></host><title>Interactions among quantitative traits in the course of sympatric speciation</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>JD Lebreton</name></json:item><json:item><name>KP Burnham</name></json:item><json:item><name>J Clobert</name></json:item><json:item><name>DR Anderson</name></json:item></author><host><volume>62</volume><pages><last>118</last><first>67</first></pages><author></author><title>Ecological Monographs</title></host><title>Modelling survival and testing biological hypotheses using marked animals: a unified approach with case studies</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Legendre P, Legendre L. 1998. Numerical ecology. Amsterdam: Elsevier.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>JB Loss</name></json:item><json:item><name>RE Glor</name></json:item></author><host><volume>18</volume><pages><last>227</last><first>220</first></pages><author></author><title>Trends in Ecology and Evolution</title></host><title>Phylogenetic comparative methods and the geography of speciation</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>G Lushai</name></json:item><json:item><name>DAS Smith</name></json:item><json:item><name>IJ Gordon</name></json:item><json:item><name>D Goulson</name></json:item><json:item><name>JA Allen</name></json:item><json:item><name>N Maclean</name></json:item></author><host><volume>90</volume><pages><last>246</last><first>236</first></pages><author></author><title>Heredity</title></host><title>Incomplete sexual isolation in sympatry between subspecies of the butterfly Danaus chrysippus (L.) and the creation of a hybrid zone</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M Masetti</name></json:item><json:item><name>V Scali</name></json:item></author><host><volume>53</volume><pages><last>470</last><first>460</first></pages><author></author><title>Atti Dell’Accademia Nationale Dei Lincei. Rendiconti</title></host><title>Ecological adjustments of the reproductive biology in Maniola jurtina from Tuscany</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>U Norberg</name></json:item><json:item><name>K Enfjäll</name></json:item><json:item><name>O Leimar</name></json:item></author><host><volume>16</volume><pages><last>14</last><first>1</first></pages><author></author><title>Evolutionary Ecology</title></host><title>Habitat exploration in butterflies – an outdoor cage experiment</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>R Ogden</name></json:item><json:item><name>RS Thorpe</name></json:item></author><host><volume>99</volume><pages><last>13615</last><first>13612</first></pages><author></author><title>Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA</title></host><title>Molecular evidence for ecological speciation in tropical habitats</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>H Van Oorschot</name></json:item><json:item><name>H Van Den Brink</name></json:item></author><host><volume>52</volume><pages><last>156</last><first>149</first></pages><author></author><title>Entomologische Berichten Amsterdam</title></host><title>Rhopalocera of Turkey. 9. Morphological and biological aspects of Maniola telmessia (Lepidoptera: Satyridae)</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>V Scali</name></json:item></author><host><volume>40</volume><pages><last>472</last><first>467</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Animal Ecology</title></host><title>Imaginal diapause and gonadal maturation of Maniola jurtina (Lepidoptera: Satyridae) from Tuscany</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>The population structure of Maniola jurtina (Lepidoptera: Satyridae): The sex‐ratio controlJournal of Animal Ecology</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>D Schluter</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>129</last><first>114</first></pages><author></author><title>Endless forms.</title></host><title>Ecological causes of speciation</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>T Schmitt</name></json:item><json:item><name>S Röber</name></json:item><json:item><name>A Seite</name></json:item></author><host><volume>85</volume><pages><last>431</last><first>419</first></pages><author></author><title>Biological Journal of the Linnean Society</title></host><title>Is the last glaciation the only relevant event for the present genetic population structure of the meadow brown butterfly Maniola jurtina (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae)?</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>C Schneider</name></json:item><json:item><name>J Dover</name></json:item><json:item><name>GLA Fry</name></json:item></author><host><volume>28</volume><pages><last>227</last><first>219</first></pages><author></author><title>Ecological Entomology</title></host><title>Movement of two grassland butterflies in the same habitat network: the role of adult resources and size of the study area</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>N Schtickzelle</name></json:item><json:item><name>E Le Boulengé</name></json:item><json:item><name>M Baguette</name></json:item></author><host><volume>97</volume><pages><last>360</last><first>349</first></pages><author></author><title>Oikos</title></host><title>Metapopulation dynamics of the bog fritillary butterfly: demographic processes in a patchy population</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>JA Scott</name></json:item></author><host><volume>91</volume><pages><last>117</last><first>103</first></pages><author></author><title>American Midland Naturalist</title></host><title>Mate‐location behavior of butterflies</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>JM Scriber</name></json:item></author><host><volume>104</volume><pages><last>235</last><first>217</first></pages><author></author><title>Entomologia Experimentaliset Applicata</title></host><title>Evolution of insect‐plant relationships: chemical constraints, coadaptation, and concordance of insect/plant traits</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>GAF Seber</name></json:item></author><host><volume>52</volume><pages><last>259</last><first>249</first></pages><author></author><title>Biometrika</title></host><title>A note on the multiple recapture census</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>KL Shaw</name></json:item><json:item><name>YM Parsons</name></json:item></author><host><volume>159</volume><pages><last>75</last><first>61</first></pages><author></author><title>American Naturalist</title></host><title>Divergence of mate recognition behavior and its consequences for genetic architecture of speciation</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>TG Shreeve</name></json:item></author><host><volume>116</volume><pages><last>226</last><first>185</first></pages><author></author><title>Tijdschrift Voor Entomologie</title></host><title>The extended flight period of Maniola jurtina (L.) (Lepidoptera: Satyridae)</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>A Simmons</name></json:item></author><host><volume>809</volume><pages><last>221</last><first>217</first></pages><author></author><title>Entomologist</title></host><title>Life history of Epinephele nurag (Ghil.)</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>G Thomson</name></json:item></author><host><volume>116</volume><pages><last>227</last><first>185</first></pages><author></author><title>Tijdschrift Voor Entomologie</title></host><title>Geographical variation of Maniola jurtina (L.) (Lepidoptera, Satyridae)</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Enzyme variation at morphological boundaries in Maniola and related genera (Lepidoptera, Nymphalinae, Satyrinae) PhD Thesis</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M Turelli</name></json:item><json:item><name>NH Barton</name></json:item><json:item><name>JA Coyne</name></json:item></author><host><volume>16</volume><pages><last>343</last><first>330</first></pages><author></author><title>Trends in Ecology and Evolution</title></host><title>Theory and speciation</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Verity R. 1953. Le farfalle diurne d’Italia, Vol 5(Satyridae).Firenze: Marzocco S.A.</title></host></json:item></refBibs><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><volume>89</volume><publisherId><json:string>BIJ</json:string></publisherId><pages><total>14</total><last>574</last><first>561</first></pages><issn><json:string>0024-4066</json:string></issn><issue>4</issue><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1095-8312</json:string></eissn><title>Biological Journal of the Linnean Society</title><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1095-8312</json:string></doi></host><categories><wos><json:string>science</json:string><json:string>evolutionary biology</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>natural sciences</json:string><json:string>biology</json:string><json:string>evolutionary biology</json:string></scienceMetrix></categories><publicationDate>2006</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2006</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1095-8312.2006.00683.x</json:string></doi><id>B4E37B873A219BBE73E0172D866CE1479B30AFE1</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/B4E37B873A219BBE73E0172D866CE1479B30AFE1/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/B4E37B873A219BBE73E0172D866CE1479B30AFE1/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/B4E37B873A219BBE73E0172D866CE1479B30AFE1/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Ecological differentiation between the Sardinian endemic Maniola nurag and the pan‐European M. jurtina</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><p>WILEY</p></availability><date>2006</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Ecological differentiation between the Sardinian endemic Maniola nurag and the pan‐European M. jurtina</title><author xml:id="author-1"><persName><forename type="first">ANDREA</forename><surname>GRILL</surname></persName><email>grill@science.uva.nl</email><affiliation>Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 94766, NL‐1090 GT Amsterdam, the Netherlands</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-2"><persName><forename type="first">NICOLAS</forename><surname>SCHTICKZELLE</surname></persName><affiliation>Université Catholique de Louvain, Biodiversity Research Centre, Ecology and Biogeography, Croix du Sud 5, B‐1348 Louvain‐la‐Neuve, Belgium</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-3"><persName><forename type="first">DANIEL F. R.</forename><surname>CLEARY</surname></persName><affiliation>Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 94766, NL‐1090 GT Amsterdam, the Netherlands</affiliation><affiliation>National Museum of Natural History Naturalis, PO Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, the Netherlands</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-4"><persName><forename type="first">GABRIEL</forename><surname>NÈVE</surname></persName><affiliation>EA Evolution Génome Environnement, Case 36, Université de Provence, 3 Place Victor Hugo, F‐13331 Marseille Cedex 3, France</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-5"><persName><forename type="first">STEPH B. J.</forename><surname>MENKEN</surname></persName><affiliation>Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 94766, NL‐1090 GT Amsterdam, the Netherlands</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Biological Journal of the Linnean Society</title><idno type="pISSN">0024-4066</idno><idno type="eISSN">1095-8312</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1095-8312</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2006-12"></date><biblScope unit="volume">89</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="561">561</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="574">574</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">B4E37B873A219BBE73E0172D866CE1479B30AFE1</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1095-8312.2006.00683.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">BIJ683</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2006</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract><p>Recently refined evolutionary theories have highlighted that ecological interactions and environmental gradients can play a major role in speciation. This paper reports on a 3‐year field study, in which the ecology of two congeneric butterfly species was used to explore and compare the environmental factors determining their spatial distribution. These data are discussed in the context of possible speciation scenarios between the Sardinian populations of Maniola nurag and M. jurtina. M. nurag is endemic to the island of Sardinia, while M. jurtina is widespread over Europe. In Sardinia, the two species are locally sympatric. Mark–release–recapture experiments were combined with measures of environmental variables in 15 1‐ha plots, established in areas of potential habitat for the butterflies. Constrained linear models were parameterized from mark–recapture data to estimate both individual (survival and capture probabilities) and population (population size and recruitment) parameters. The two species had similar demography, movement patterns, life history, and behaviour. Population sizes developed in a parabolic fashion from beginning to end of the flight season. Differences included local population size, adult phenology, and habitat requirements. Long‐distance movements larger than 1.5 km were observed, suggesting a substantial amount of gene‐flow between populations of the endemic as well as the widespread species. Multivariate analyses revealed four main environmental gradients responsible for the abundance of the butterflies in an area. Both species responded similarly to environmental variables. However, each species’s abundance was correlated with a different environmental gradient determined by vegetation cover and structure. When sympatric, the two species responded to subtle differences in microhabitat structure. This might originally have induced their divergence. This study is an example of how empirical field data on population dynamics, dispersal, and habitat characteristics of two sympatric congeners can further our understanding of how species differentiate despite existing gene‐flow. © 2006 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2006, 89, 561–574.</p></abstract><textClass xml:lang="en"><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>keywords</head><item><term>aestivation</term></item><item><term>butterflies</term></item><item><term>demography</term></item><item><term>environmental gradients</term></item><item><term>Lepidoptera</term></item><item><term>mark–release–recapture</term></item><item><term>movement</term></item><item><term>Nymphalidae</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2006-12">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/B4E37B873A219BBE73E0172D866CE1479B30AFE1/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1095-8312</doi><issn type="print">0024-4066</issn><issn type="electronic">1095-8312</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="BIJ"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="BIOLOGICAL JOURNAL LINNEAN SOCIETY">Biological Journal of the Linnean Society</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="12004"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/bij.2006.89.issue-4</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="89">89</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="4">4</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2006-12">December 2006</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="1" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1095-8312.2006.00683.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="BIJ683"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="14"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2006-12-04"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2006-12-04"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.15 mode:FullText" date="2010-07-15"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-02-22"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-15"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="561">561</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="574">574</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo> Current address: Institut de Zoologie, Université de Neuchâtel, Rue Emile Argand 11, CH‐2000 Neuchâtel, Switzerland. E‐mail: <email>grill@science.uva.nl</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:BIJ.BIJ683.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory>Received 1 December 2004; accepted for publication 15 January 2006</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="7"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="3"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="61"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="5872"></count><count type="linksPubMed" number="0"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="0"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Ecological differentiation between the Sardinian endemic <i>Maniola nurag</i> and the pan‐European <i>M. jurtina</i></title><title type="shortAuthors">GRILL <i>ET AL.</i></title><title type="short">ECOLOGY <i>OF MANIOLA NURAG</i> AND <i>M. JURTINA</i></title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1" corresponding="yes"><personName><givenNames>ANDREA</givenNames><familyName>GRILL</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>NICOLAS</givenNames><familyName>SCHTICKZELLE</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a1 #a3"><personName><givenNames>DANIEL F. R.</givenNames><familyName>CLEARY</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a4"><personName><givenNames>GABRIEL</givenNames><familyName>NÈVE</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr5" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>STEPH B. J.</givenNames><familyName>MENKEN</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="NL"><unparsedAffiliation>Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 94766, NL‐1090 GT Amsterdam, the Netherlands</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="BE"><unparsedAffiliation>Université Catholique de Louvain, Biodiversity Research Centre, Ecology and Biogeography, Croix du Sud 5, B‐1348 Louvain‐la‐Neuve, Belgium</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a3" countryCode="NL"><unparsedAffiliation>National Museum of Natural History Naturalis, PO Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, the Netherlands</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a4" countryCode="FR"><unparsedAffiliation>EA Evolution Génome Environnement, Case 36, Université de Provence, 3 Place Victor Hugo, F‐13331 Marseille Cedex 3, France</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">aestivation</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">butterflies</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">demography</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">environmental gradients</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">Lepidoptera</keyword><keyword xml:id="k6">mark–release–recapture</keyword><keyword xml:id="k7">movement</keyword><keyword xml:id="k8">Nymphalidae</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p>Recently refined evolutionary theories have highlighted that ecological interactions and environmental gradients can play a major role in speciation. This paper reports on a 3‐year field study, in which the ecology of two congeneric butterfly species was used to explore and compare the environmental factors determining their spatial distribution. These data are discussed in the context of possible speciation scenarios between the Sardinian populations of <i>Maniola nurag</i> and <i>M. jurtina. M. nurag</i> is endemic to the island of Sardinia, while <i>M. jurtina</i> is widespread over Europe. In Sardinia, the two species are locally sympatric. Mark–release–recapture experiments were combined with measures of environmental variables in 15 1‐ha plots, established in areas of potential habitat for the butterflies. Constrained linear models were parameterized from mark–recapture data to estimate both individual (survival and capture probabilities) and population (population size and recruitment) parameters. The two species had similar demography, movement patterns, life history, and behaviour. Population sizes developed in a parabolic fashion from beginning to end of the flight season. Differences included local population size, adult phenology, and habitat requirements. Long‐distance movements larger than 1.5 km were observed, suggesting a substantial amount of gene‐flow between populations of the endemic as well as the widespread species. Multivariate analyses revealed four main environmental gradients responsible for the abundance of the butterflies in an area. Both species responded similarly to environmental variables. However, each species’s abundance was correlated with a different environmental gradient determined by vegetation cover and structure. When sympatric, the two species responded to subtle differences in microhabitat structure. This might originally have induced their divergence. This study is an example of how empirical field data on population dynamics, dispersal, and habitat characteristics of two sympatric congeners can further our understanding of how species differentiate despite existing gene‐flow. © 2006 The Linnean Society of London, <i>Biological Journal of the Linnean Society</i>, 2006, <b>89</b>, 561–574.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Ecological differentiation between the Sardinian endemic Maniola nurag and the pan‐European M. jurtina</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>ECOLOGY OF MANIOLA NURAG AND M. JURTINA</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Ecological differentiation between the Sardinian endemic Maniola nurag and the pan‐European M. jurtina</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">ANDREA</namePart><namePart type="family">GRILL</namePart><affiliation>Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 94766, NL‐1090 GT Amsterdam, the Netherlands</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: grill@science.uva.nl</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">NICOLAS</namePart><namePart type="family">SCHTICKZELLE</namePart><affiliation>Université Catholique de Louvain, Biodiversity Research Centre, Ecology and Biogeography, Croix du Sud 5, B‐1348 Louvain‐la‐Neuve, Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">DANIEL F. R.</namePart><namePart type="family">CLEARY</namePart><affiliation>Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 94766, NL‐1090 GT Amsterdam, the Netherlands</affiliation><affiliation>National Museum of Natural History Naturalis, PO Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, the Netherlands</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">GABRIEL</namePart><namePart type="family">NÈVE</namePart><affiliation>EA Evolution Génome Environnement, Case 36, Université de Provence, 3 Place Victor Hugo, F‐13331 Marseille Cedex 3, France</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">STEPH B. J.</namePart><namePart type="family">MENKEN</namePart><affiliation>Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 94766, NL‐1090 GT Amsterdam, the Netherlands</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2006-12</dateIssued><edition>Received 1 December 2004; accepted for publication 15 January 2006</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2006</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType><extent unit="figures">7</extent><extent unit="tables">3</extent><extent unit="references">61</extent><extent unit="words">5872</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Recently refined evolutionary theories have highlighted that ecological interactions and environmental gradients can play a major role in speciation. This paper reports on a 3‐year field study, in which the ecology of two congeneric butterfly species was used to explore and compare the environmental factors determining their spatial distribution. These data are discussed in the context of possible speciation scenarios between the Sardinian populations of Maniola nurag and M. jurtina. M. nurag is endemic to the island of Sardinia, while M. jurtina is widespread over Europe. In Sardinia, the two species are locally sympatric. Mark–release–recapture experiments were combined with measures of environmental variables in 15 1‐ha plots, established in areas of potential habitat for the butterflies. Constrained linear models were parameterized from mark–recapture data to estimate both individual (survival and capture probabilities) and population (population size and recruitment) parameters. The two species had similar demography, movement patterns, life history, and behaviour. Population sizes developed in a parabolic fashion from beginning to end of the flight season. Differences included local population size, adult phenology, and habitat requirements. Long‐distance movements larger than 1.5 km were observed, suggesting a substantial amount of gene‐flow between populations of the endemic as well as the widespread species. Multivariate analyses revealed four main environmental gradients responsible for the abundance of the butterflies in an area. Both species responded similarly to environmental variables. However, each species’s abundance was correlated with a different environmental gradient determined by vegetation cover and structure. When sympatric, the two species responded to subtle differences in microhabitat structure. This might originally have induced their divergence. This study is an example of how empirical field data on population dynamics, dispersal, and habitat characteristics of two sympatric congeners can further our understanding of how species differentiate despite existing gene‐flow. © 2006 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2006, 89, 561–574.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>aestivation</topic><topic>butterflies</topic><topic>demography</topic><topic>environmental gradients</topic><topic>Lepidoptera</topic><topic>mark–release–recapture</topic><topic>movement</topic><topic>Nymphalidae</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Biological Journal of the Linnean Society</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0024-4066</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1095-8312</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1095-8312</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">BIJ</identifier><part><date>2006</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>89</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>4</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>561</start><end>574</end><total>14</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">B4E37B873A219BBE73E0172D866CE1479B30AFE1</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1095-8312.2006.00683.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">BIJ683</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource>WILEY</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Bois/explor/CheneBelgiqueV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000773 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000773 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Bois
|area= CheneBelgiqueV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:B4E37B873A219BBE73E0172D866CE1479B30AFE1
|texte= Ecological differentiation between the Sardinian endemic Maniola nurag and the pan‐European M. jurtina
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.27. |  |