Serveur d'exploration sur le chêne en Belgique (avant curation)

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Relationships between vegetation, site type and stand structure in coniferous plantations in Britain

Identifieur interne : 000E98 ( Main/Merge ); précédent : 000E97; suivant : 000E99

Relationships between vegetation, site type and stand structure in coniferous plantations in Britain

Auteurs : R. Ferris [Royaume-Uni] ; A. J Peace [Royaume-Uni] ; J. W Humphrey [Royaume-Uni] ; A. C Broome [Royaume-Uni]

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:FFB188661D6A1FD3F8A2B0BD6515FCC31A55D891

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Plant communities (ground and field layer species) within a wide range of coniferous forest stands across Britain were classified using the National Vegetation Classification, and community composition and diversity related to stand structure and site characteristics. Data were collected from 12 plantation forest sites, encompassing a range of climatic conditions (uplands, foothills, and lowlands), crop types (Scots pine, Sitka spruce, Norway spruce and Corsican pine), and crop ages (pre-thicket, mid-rotation, mature and over-mature). Vegetation communities in lowland sites were poorly correlated with semi-natural woodland analogues, with ‘goodness-of-fit’ coefficients less than 40%. The highest coefficients were obtained for mature and over-mature pine and spruce stands in the uplands and foothills climatic zones. These stands were matched most closely to semi-natural pinewoods and oakwood communities. Principal components analysis produced four summary soil vectors and four habitat structure vectors, that described 84 and 79% of the variability in the site and stand structure data, respectively. These vectors were related to plant community composition, species richness and diversity using canonical correspondence analysis and correlation analysis. Variation in community composition was related principally to a soil fertility gradient, defined by increasing pH, exchangeable Ca, and available N in NO3− form, coupled with decreases in soil organic matter and N in NH4+ form. Vascular plant and bryophyte species diversity was inversely related to available N. Uplands and foothills Scots pine and Sitka spruce sites had plant communities typical of acid, infertile soils, whereas lowland Norway spruce sites had communities associated with high soil fertility. Plant community composition and diversity was also significantly related to measures of vertical stand structure. Pre-thicket plots, with high values for field layer vertical cover; had distinctive communities and were more diverse than mid-rotation and mature plots; which had high canopy cover values, and low shrub and field layer cover. A positive relationship was recorded between deadwood volume and bryophyte species diversity, with over-mature Sitka spruce stands in the uplands having particularly high volumes of deadwood due to windthrow. This influence of stand structure suggests that plant community diversity can be enhanced in commercial conifer forests by extending rotation lengths, introducing alternative silvicultural systems such as shelterwood, and increasing deadwood volumes.

Url:
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00268-6

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Links to Exploration step

ISTEX:FFB188661D6A1FD3F8A2B0BD6515FCC31A55D891

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Relationships between vegetation, site type and stand structure in coniferous plantations in Britain</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Ferris, R" sort="Ferris, R" uniqKey="Ferris R" first="R" last="Ferris">R. Ferris</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Peace, A J" sort="Peace, A J" uniqKey="Peace A" first="A. J" last="Peace">A. J Peace</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Humphrey, J W" sort="Humphrey, J W" uniqKey="Humphrey J" first="J. W" last="Humphrey">J. W Humphrey</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Broome, A C" sort="Broome, A C" uniqKey="Broome A" first="A. C" last="Broome">A. C Broome</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:FFB188661D6A1FD3F8A2B0BD6515FCC31A55D891</idno>
<date when="2000" year="2000">2000</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00268-6</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/FFB188661D6A1FD3F8A2B0BD6515FCC31A55D891/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000176</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000176</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">000176</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">000A54</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000A54</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0378-1127:2000:Ferris R:relationships:between:vegetation</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">000E98</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Relationships between vegetation, site type and stand structure in coniferous plantations in Britain</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Ferris, R" sort="Ferris, R" uniqKey="Ferris R" first="R" last="Ferris">R. Ferris</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<country wicri:rule="url">Royaume-Uni</country>
</affiliation>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Forestry Commission Research Agency, Alice Holt Lodge, Wrecclesham, Farnham, Surrey GU10 4LH</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Surrey GU10 4LH</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Peace, A J" sort="Peace, A J" uniqKey="Peace A" first="A. J" last="Peace">A. J Peace</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Forestry Commission Research Agency, Alice Holt Lodge, Wrecclesham, Farnham, Surrey GU10 4LH</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Surrey GU10 4LH</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Humphrey, J W" sort="Humphrey, J W" uniqKey="Humphrey J" first="J. W" last="Humphrey">J. W Humphrey</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Forestry Commission Research Agency, Northern Research Station, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9SY</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Midlothian EH25 9SY</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Broome, A C" sort="Broome, A C" uniqKey="Broome A" first="A. C" last="Broome">A. C Broome</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Forestry Commission Research Agency, Northern Research Station, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9SY</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Midlothian EH25 9SY</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j">Forest Ecology and Management</title>
<title level="j" type="abbrev">FORECO</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0378-1127</idno>
<imprint>
<publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher>
<date type="published" when="2000">2000</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">136</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">1–3</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="35">35</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="51">51</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0378-1127</idno>
</series>
<idno type="istex">FFB188661D6A1FD3F8A2B0BD6515FCC31A55D891</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00268-6</idno>
<idno type="PII">S0378-1127(99)00268-6</idno>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">0378-1127</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Biodiversity</term>
<term>Forest management</term>
<term>Plant communities</term>
<term>Soils</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Biodiversité</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<langUsage>
<language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Plant communities (ground and field layer species) within a wide range of coniferous forest stands across Britain were classified using the National Vegetation Classification, and community composition and diversity related to stand structure and site characteristics. Data were collected from 12 plantation forest sites, encompassing a range of climatic conditions (uplands, foothills, and lowlands), crop types (Scots pine, Sitka spruce, Norway spruce and Corsican pine), and crop ages (pre-thicket, mid-rotation, mature and over-mature). Vegetation communities in lowland sites were poorly correlated with semi-natural woodland analogues, with ‘goodness-of-fit’ coefficients less than 40%. The highest coefficients were obtained for mature and over-mature pine and spruce stands in the uplands and foothills climatic zones. These stands were matched most closely to semi-natural pinewoods and oakwood communities. Principal components analysis produced four summary soil vectors and four habitat structure vectors, that described 84 and 79% of the variability in the site and stand structure data, respectively. These vectors were related to plant community composition, species richness and diversity using canonical correspondence analysis and correlation analysis. Variation in community composition was related principally to a soil fertility gradient, defined by increasing pH, exchangeable Ca, and available N in NO3− form, coupled with decreases in soil organic matter and N in NH4+ form. Vascular plant and bryophyte species diversity was inversely related to available N. Uplands and foothills Scots pine and Sitka spruce sites had plant communities typical of acid, infertile soils, whereas lowland Norway spruce sites had communities associated with high soil fertility. Plant community composition and diversity was also significantly related to measures of vertical stand structure. Pre-thicket plots, with high values for field layer vertical cover; had distinctive communities and were more diverse than mid-rotation and mature plots; which had high canopy cover values, and low shrub and field layer cover. A positive relationship was recorded between deadwood volume and bryophyte species diversity, with over-mature Sitka spruce stands in the uplands having particularly high volumes of deadwood due to windthrow. This influence of stand structure suggests that plant community diversity can be enhanced in commercial conifer forests by extending rotation lengths, introducing alternative silvicultural systems such as shelterwood, and increasing deadwood volumes.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Bois/explor/CheneBelgiqueV1/Data/Main/Merge
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000E98 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Merge/biblio.hfd -nk 000E98 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Bois
   |area=    CheneBelgiqueV1
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Merge
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:FFB188661D6A1FD3F8A2B0BD6515FCC31A55D891
   |texte=   Relationships between vegetation, site type and stand structure in coniferous plantations in Britain
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.27.
Data generation: Tue Feb 21 23:48:11 2017. Site generation: Wed Mar 6 16:29:49 2024