Clear‐felling effects on colonization rates of shade‐tolerant forest herbs into a post‐agricultural forest adjacent to ancient forest
Identifieur interne : 001499 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 001498; suivant : 001500Clear‐felling effects on colonization rates of shade‐tolerant forest herbs into a post‐agricultural forest adjacent to ancient forest
Auteurs : Luc De Keersmaeker ; Kris Vandekerkhove ; Arne Verstraeten ; Lander Baeten ; Pieter Verschelde ; Arno Thomaes ; Martin Hermy ; Kris VerheyenSource :
- Applied Vegetation Science [ 1402-2001 ] ; 2011-02.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
Question: Does clear‐felling influence forest herb colonization into post‐agricultural forest?
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1654-109X.2010.01101.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:10B812D192B26CD5ABEBB4F1F25AC73262774BD9Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Clear‐felling effects on colonization rates of shade‐tolerant forest herbs into a post‐agricultural forest adjacent to ancient forest</title><author><name sortKey="De Keersmaeker, Luc" sort="De Keersmaeker, Luc" uniqKey="De Keersmaeker L" first="Luc" last="De Keersmaeker">Luc De Keersmaeker</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Research Institute for Nature and Forest (INBO), Gaverstraat 4, B–9500 Geraardsbergen, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Vandekerkhove, Kris" sort="Vandekerkhove, Kris" uniqKey="Vandekerkhove K" first="Kris" last="Vandekerkhove">Kris Vandekerkhove</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Research Institute for Nature and Forest (INBO), Gaverstraat 4, B–9500 Geraardsbergen, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Verstraeten, Arne" sort="Verstraeten, Arne" uniqKey="Verstraeten A" first="Arne" last="Verstraeten">Arne Verstraeten</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Research Institute for Nature and Forest (INBO), Gaverstraat 4, B–9500 Geraardsbergen, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Baeten, Lander" sort="Baeten, Lander" uniqKey="Baeten L" first="Lander" last="Baeten">Lander Baeten</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Laboratory of Forestry, Ghent University, Geraardsbergse Steenweg 267, B–9090 Gontrode (Melle), Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Verschelde, Pieter" sort="Verschelde, Pieter" uniqKey="Verschelde P" first="Pieter" last="Verschelde">Pieter Verschelde</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Research Institute for Nature and Forest (INBO), Gaverstraat 4, B–9500 Geraardsbergen, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Thomaes, Arno" sort="Thomaes, Arno" uniqKey="Thomaes A" first="Arno" last="Thomaes">Arno Thomaes</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Research Institute for Nature and Forest (INBO), Gaverstraat 4, B–9500 Geraardsbergen, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Hermy, Martin" sort="Hermy, Martin" uniqKey="Hermy M" first="Martin" last="Hermy">Martin Hermy</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Earth & Environmental Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200E, B–3001 Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Verheyen, Kris" sort="Verheyen, Kris" uniqKey="Verheyen K" first="Kris" last="Verheyen">Kris Verheyen</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Laboratory of Forestry, Ghent University, Geraardsbergse Steenweg 267, B–9090 Gontrode (Melle), Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:10B812D192B26CD5ABEBB4F1F25AC73262774BD9</idno><date when="2011" year="2011">2011</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1654-109X.2010.01101.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/10B812D192B26CD5ABEBB4F1F25AC73262774BD9/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001499</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001499</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Clear‐felling effects on colonization rates of shade‐tolerant forest herbs into a post‐agricultural forest adjacent to ancient forest</title><author><name sortKey="De Keersmaeker, Luc" sort="De Keersmaeker, Luc" uniqKey="De Keersmaeker L" first="Luc" last="De Keersmaeker">Luc De Keersmaeker</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Research Institute for Nature and Forest (INBO), Gaverstraat 4, B–9500 Geraardsbergen, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Vandekerkhove, Kris" sort="Vandekerkhove, Kris" uniqKey="Vandekerkhove K" first="Kris" last="Vandekerkhove">Kris Vandekerkhove</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Research Institute for Nature and Forest (INBO), Gaverstraat 4, B–9500 Geraardsbergen, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Verstraeten, Arne" sort="Verstraeten, Arne" uniqKey="Verstraeten A" first="Arne" last="Verstraeten">Arne Verstraeten</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Research Institute for Nature and Forest (INBO), Gaverstraat 4, B–9500 Geraardsbergen, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Baeten, Lander" sort="Baeten, Lander" uniqKey="Baeten L" first="Lander" last="Baeten">Lander Baeten</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Laboratory of Forestry, Ghent University, Geraardsbergse Steenweg 267, B–9090 Gontrode (Melle), Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Verschelde, Pieter" sort="Verschelde, Pieter" uniqKey="Verschelde P" first="Pieter" last="Verschelde">Pieter Verschelde</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Research Institute for Nature and Forest (INBO), Gaverstraat 4, B–9500 Geraardsbergen, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Thomaes, Arno" sort="Thomaes, Arno" uniqKey="Thomaes A" first="Arno" last="Thomaes">Arno Thomaes</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Research Institute for Nature and Forest (INBO), Gaverstraat 4, B–9500 Geraardsbergen, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Hermy, Martin" sort="Hermy, Martin" uniqKey="Hermy M" first="Martin" last="Hermy">Martin Hermy</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Earth & Environmental Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200E, B–3001 Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Verheyen, Kris" sort="Verheyen, Kris" uniqKey="Verheyen K" first="Kris" last="Verheyen">Kris Verheyen</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Laboratory of Forestry, Ghent University, Geraardsbergse Steenweg 267, B–9090 Gontrode (Melle), Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Applied Vegetation Science</title><idno type="ISSN">1402-2001</idno><idno type="eISSN">1654-109X</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2011-02">2011-02</date><biblScope unit="volume">14</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="75">75</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="83">83</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1402-2001</idno></series><idno type="istex">10B812D192B26CD5ABEBB4F1F25AC73262774BD9</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1654-109X.2010.01101.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">AVSC1101</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1402-2001</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Clearcutting</term><term>Ellenberg indicator value for light</term><term>Herbaceous layer</term><term>Plant species migration</term><term>Populus×canadensis</term><term>Secondary succession</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Question: Does clear‐felling influence forest herb colonization into post‐agricultural forest?</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Luc De Keersmaeker</name><affiliations><json:string>Research Institute for Nature and Forest (INBO), Gaverstraat 4, B–9500 Geraardsbergen, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Kris Vandekerkhove</name><affiliations><json:string>Research Institute for Nature and Forest (INBO), Gaverstraat 4, B–9500 Geraardsbergen, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Arne Verstraeten</name><affiliations><json:string>Research Institute for Nature and Forest (INBO), Gaverstraat 4, B–9500 Geraardsbergen, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Lander Baeten</name><affiliations><json:string>Laboratory of Forestry, Ghent University, Geraardsbergse Steenweg 267, B–9090 Gontrode (Melle), Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Pieter Verschelde</name><affiliations><json:string>Research Institute for Nature and Forest (INBO), Gaverstraat 4, B–9500 Geraardsbergen, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Arno Thomaes</name><affiliations><json:string>Research Institute for Nature and Forest (INBO), Gaverstraat 4, B–9500 Geraardsbergen, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Martin Hermy</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Earth & Environmental Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200E, B–3001 Leuven, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Kris Verheyen</name><affiliations><json:string>Laboratory of Forestry, Ghent University, Geraardsbergse Steenweg 267, B–9090 Gontrode (Melle), Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Clearcutting</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Ellenberg indicator value for light</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Herbaceous layer</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Plant species migration</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Populus×canadensis</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Secondary succession</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>AVSC1101</json:string></articleId><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><qualityIndicators><score>5.12</score><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 782.362 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractCharCount>94</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>5571</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>34993</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>9</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>10</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Clear‐felling effects on colonization rates of shade‐tolerant forest herbs into a post‐agricultural forest adjacent to ancient forest</title><refBibs><json:item><author><json:item><name>J.E. Ash</name></json:item><json:item><name>J.P. Barkham</name></json:item></author><host><volume>64</volume><pages><last>712</last><first>697</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Ecology</title></host><title>Changes and variability in the field layer of a coppiced woodland in Norfolk, England</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>L. Baeten</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Hermy</name></json:item><json:item><name>K. Verheyen</name></json:item></author><host><volume>20</volume><pages><last>223</last><first>209</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Vegetation Science</title></host><title>Environmental limitation contributes to the differential colonization capacity of two forest herbs</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J. Bergstedt</name></json:item><json:item><name>P. Milberg</name></json:item></author><host><volume>154</volume><pages><last>115</last><first>105</first></pages><author></author><title>Forest Ecology and Management</title></host><title>The impact of logging intensity on field‐layer vegetation in Swedish boreal forests</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>B. Bossuyt</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Hermy</name></json:item><json:item><name>J. Deckers</name></json:item></author><host><volume>87</volume><pages><last>638</last><first>628</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Ecology</title></host><title>Migration of herbaceous plant species across ancient‐recent forest ecotones in central Belgium</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>A.H.F. Brown</name></json:item><json:item><name>L. Oosterhuis</name></json:item></author><host><volume>21</volume><pages><last>38</last><first>19</first></pages><author></author><title>Biological Conservation</title></host><title>The role of buried seeds in coppicewoods</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J. Brunet</name></json:item><json:item><name>G. von Oheimb</name></json:item></author><host><volume>18</volume><pages><last>377</last><first>369</first></pages><author></author><title>Nordic Journal of Botany</title></host><title>Colonization of secondary woodlands by Anemone nemorosa</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>B.S. Collins</name></json:item><json:item><name>S.T.A. Pickett</name></json:item></author><host><volume>76</volume><pages><last>450</last><first>437</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Ecology</title></host><title>Demographic responses of herb layer species to experimental canopy gaps in a northern hardwoods forest</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Cornelis, J., Hermy, M., Roelandt, B., De Keersmaeker, L. & Vandekerkhove, K. 2009. Bosplantengemeenschappen in Vlaanderen, een typologie van bossen op basis van de kruidachtige vegetatie. INBO.M.2009.5. Agentschap voor Natuur en Bos en Instituut voor Natuur‐ en Bosonderzoek, Brussels, BE.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>L. De Keersmaeker</name></json:item><json:item><name>L. Martens</name></json:item><json:item><name>K. Verheyen</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Hermy</name></json:item><json:item><name>A. De Schrijver</name></json:item><json:item><name>N. Lust</name></json:item></author><host><volume>188</volume><pages><last>304</last><first>291</first></pages><author></author><title>Forest Ecology and Management</title></host><title>Impact of soil fertility and insolation on diversity of herbaceous woodland species colonizing afforestations in Muizen forest (Belgium)</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>H. Ellenberg</name></json:item><json:item><name>H.E. Weber</name></json:item><json:item><name>R. Düll</name></json:item><json:item><name>V. Wirth</name></json:item><json:item><name>V. Werner</name></json:item><json:item><name>D. Paulissen</name></json:item></author><host><volume>18</volume><pages><last>248</last><first>1</first></pages><author></author><title>Scripta Geobotanica</title></host><title>Zeigerwerte von Pflanzen in Mitteleuropa</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>K.M. Flinn</name></json:item></author><host><volume>88</volume><pages><last>3114</last><first>3103</first></pages><author></author><title>Ecology</title></host><title>Microsite‐limited recruitment controls fern colonization of post‐agricultural forests</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>E.D. Ford</name></json:item><json:item><name>P.J. Newbould</name></json:item></author><host><volume>65</volume><pages><last>212</last><first>201</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Ecology</title></host><title>The biomass and production of ground vegetation and its relation to tree cover through a deciduous woodland cycle</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>S. Godefroid</name></json:item><json:item><name>S. Rucquoij</name></json:item><json:item><name>N. Koedam</name></json:item></author><host><volume>210</volume><pages><last>53</last><first>39</first></pages><author></author><title>Forest Ecology and Management</title></host><title>To what extent do forest herbs recover after clear‐felling in beech forest?</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Grime, J.P. 2001. Plant strategies, vegetation processes and ecosystem properties. Wiley, Chichester, UK.</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Grime, J.P., Hodgson, J.G. & Hunt, R. 1988. Comparative plant ecology: a functional approach to common British species. Unwin Hyman, London, UK.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>I. Hanski</name></json:item></author><host><volume>63</volume><pages><last>162</last><first>151</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Animal Ecology</title></host><title>A practical model of metapopulation dynamics</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Hermy, M. 1985. Ecologie en fytosociologie van oude en jonge bossen in Binnen‐Vlaanderen. Ph.D. Thesis. Ghent University, BE.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. Hermy</name></json:item><json:item><name>O. Honnay</name></json:item><json:item><name>L. Firbank</name></json:item><json:item><name>C.J. Grashof‐Bokdam</name></json:item><json:item><name>J.E. Lawesson</name></json:item></author><host><volume>91</volume><pages><last>22</last><first>9</first></pages><author></author><title>Biological Conservation</title></host><title>An ecological comparison between ancient and other forest plant species of Europe, and implications for forest conservation</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Hill, M.O., Mountford, J.O., Roy, D.B. & Bunce, R.G.H. 1999. Ellenberg's indicator values for British Plants. ECOFACT 2a Technical Annex, ITE Monks Wood, Abbots Ripton, Huntingdon, UK.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J.W. Hughes</name></json:item><json:item><name>T.J. Fahey</name></json:item></author><host><volume>79</volume><pages><last>616</last><first>605</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Ecology</title></host><title>Colonization dynamics of herbs and shrubs in a disturbed northern hardwood forest</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>R. Hunt</name></json:item><json:item><name>J.G. Hodgson</name></json:item><json:item><name>K. Thompson</name></json:item><json:item><name>P. Bungener</name></json:item><json:item><name>N.P. Dunnett</name></json:item><json:item><name>A.P. Askew</name></json:item></author><host><volume>7</volume><pages><last>170</last><first>163</first></pages><author></author><title>Applied Vegetation Science</title></host><title>A new practical tool for deriving a functional signature for herbaceous vegetation</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>IUSS Working Group WRB. 2006. World reference base for soil resources 2006. 2nd ednFAO, Rome, IT.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>A.S. Johnson</name></json:item><json:item><name>W.M. Ford</name></json:item><json:item><name>P.E. Hale</name></json:item></author><host><volume>7</volume><pages><last>435</last><first>433</first></pages><author></author><title>Conservation Biology</title></host><title>The effects of clearcutting on herbaceous understories are still not fully known</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>K.J. Kirby</name></json:item></author><host><volume>63</volume><pages><last>249</last><first>241</first></pages><author></author><title>Forestry</title></host><title>Changes in the ground flora of a broadleaved wood within a clear fell, group fells and a coppiced block</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>G. Kjellsson</name></json:item></author><host><volume>15</volume><pages><last>100</last><first>86</first></pages><author></author><title>Ecography</title></host><title>Seed banks in Danish deciduous forests</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Lambinon, J., De anghe, J.E., Delvosalle, L. & Duvignaud, J. 1998. Flora van België, het Groothertogdom Luxemburg, Noord‐Frankrijk en de aangrenzende gebieden (Pteridofyten en spermatofyten). Nationale Plantentuin van België, Meise, BE.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>G. Londo</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>49</last><first>45</first></pages><author></author><title>Sampling methods and taxon analysis in vegetation science</title></host><title>The decimal scale for relevés of permanent quadrats</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>N. Lust</name></json:item><json:item><name>T. Kongs</name></json:item><json:item><name>L. Nachtergale</name></json:item><json:item><name>L. De Keersmaeker</name></json:item></author><host><volume>58</volume><pages><last>868</last><first>861</first></pages><author></author><title>Annals of Forest Science</title></host><title>Spontaneous ingrowth of tree species in poplar plantations in Flanders</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>C.F. Mason</name></json:item><json:item><name>S.M. MacDonald</name></json:item></author><host><volume>11</volume><pages><last>1789</last><first>1773</first></pages><author></author><title>Biodiversity and Conservation</title></host><title>Responses of ground flora to coppice management in an English woodland ‐ a study using permanent quadrats</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>G.R. Matlack</name></json:item></author><host><volume>82</volume><pages><last>123</last><first>112</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Ecology</title></host><title>Vegetation dynamics of the forest edge – trends in space and successional time</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>G.R. Matlack</name></json:item></author><host><volume>75</volume><pages><last>1502</last><first>1491</first></pages><author></author><title>Ecology</title></host><title>Plant species migration in a mixed‐history forest landscape in eastern North America</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>P.L. Mitchell</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>51</last><first>31</first></pages><author></author><title>Ecology and management of coppice woodlands</title></host><title>Growth stages and microclimate in coppice and high forest</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>F.M. Moola</name></json:item><json:item><name>L. Vasseur</name></json:item></author><host><volume>172</volume><pages><last>197</last><first>183</first></pages><author></author><title>Plant Ecology</title></host><title>Recovery of late‐seral vascular plants in a chronosequence of post‐clearcut forest stands in coastal Nova Scotia, Canada</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Peterken, G.F. 1981. Woodland conservation and management. Chapman & Hall, London, UK.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>G.F. Peterken</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Game</name></json:item></author><host><volume>72</volume><pages><last>182</last><first>155</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Ecology</title></host><title>Historical factors affecting the number and distribution of vascular plant‐species in the woodlands of Central Lincolnshire</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Pinheiro, J.C. & Chao, E.C. 2005. S‐plus 7 enterprise: the S+Correlated Data Library. Insightful Corporation, Seattle, WA, US.</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Rackham, O. 2003. Ancient woodland: its history, vegetation and uses in England. 2nd ed. Castlepoint Press, Colvend, Dalbeattie, UK.</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Sokal, R.R. & Rohlf, F.J. 1995. Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research. 3rd ed. W.H. Freeman and Co, New York, NY, USA.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>E. Van der Maarel</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>51</last><first>1</first></pages><author></author><title>Vegetation ecology</title></host><title>Vegetation ecology – an overview</title></json:item></refBibs><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><volume>14</volume><publisherId><json:string>AVSC</json:string></publisherId><pages><total>9</total><last>83</last><first>75</first></pages><issn><json:string>1402-2001</json:string></issn><issue>1</issue><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1654-109X</json:string></eissn><title>Applied Vegetation Science</title><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1654-109X</json:string></doi></host><categories><wos><json:string>science</json:string><json:string>plant sciences</json:string><json:string>forestry</json:string><json:string>ecology</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>natural sciences</json:string><json:string>biology</json:string><json:string>ecology</json:string></scienceMetrix></categories><publicationDate>2011</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2011</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1654-109X.2010.01101.x</json:string></doi><id>10B812D192B26CD5ABEBB4F1F25AC73262774BD9</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/10B812D192B26CD5ABEBB4F1F25AC73262774BD9/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/10B812D192B26CD5ABEBB4F1F25AC73262774BD9/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/10B812D192B26CD5ABEBB4F1F25AC73262774BD9/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Clear‐felling effects on colonization rates of shade‐tolerant forest herbs into a post‐agricultural forest adjacent to ancient forest</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><p>© 2010 International Association for Vegetation Science</p></availability><date>2011</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Clear‐felling effects on colonization rates of shade‐tolerant forest herbs into a post‐agricultural forest adjacent to ancient forest</title><author xml:id="author-1"><persName><forename type="first">Luc</forename><surname>De Keersmaeker</surname></persName><affiliation>Research Institute for Nature and Forest (INBO), Gaverstraat 4, B–9500 Geraardsbergen, Belgium</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-2"><persName><forename type="first">Kris</forename><surname>Vandekerkhove</surname></persName><affiliation>Research Institute for Nature and Forest (INBO), Gaverstraat 4, B–9500 Geraardsbergen, Belgium</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-3"><persName><forename type="first">Arne</forename><surname>Verstraeten</surname></persName><affiliation>Research Institute for Nature and Forest (INBO), Gaverstraat 4, B–9500 Geraardsbergen, Belgium</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-4"><persName><forename type="first">Lander</forename><surname>Baeten</surname></persName><affiliation>Laboratory of Forestry, Ghent University, Geraardsbergse Steenweg 267, B–9090 Gontrode (Melle), Belgium</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-5"><persName><forename type="first">Pieter</forename><surname>Verschelde</surname></persName><affiliation>Research Institute for Nature and Forest (INBO), Gaverstraat 4, B–9500 Geraardsbergen, Belgium</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-6"><persName><forename type="first">Arno</forename><surname>Thomaes</surname></persName><affiliation>Research Institute for Nature and Forest (INBO), Gaverstraat 4, B–9500 Geraardsbergen, Belgium</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-7"><persName><forename type="first">Martin</forename><surname>Hermy</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Earth & Environmental Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200E, B–3001 Leuven, Belgium</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-8"><persName><forename type="first">Kris</forename><surname>Verheyen</surname></persName><affiliation>Laboratory of Forestry, Ghent University, Geraardsbergse Steenweg 267, B–9090 Gontrode (Melle), Belgium</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Applied Vegetation Science</title><idno type="pISSN">1402-2001</idno><idno type="eISSN">1654-109X</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1654-109X</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2011-02"></date><biblScope unit="volume">14</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="75">75</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="83">83</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">10B812D192B26CD5ABEBB4F1F25AC73262774BD9</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1654-109X.2010.01101.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">AVSC1101</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2011</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract><p>Question: Does clear‐felling influence forest herb colonization into post‐agricultural forest?</p></abstract><abstract><p>Location: A stand of poplar cultivars with a dense understorey of Acer pseudoplatanus in Muizen forest (northern Belgium), planted in 1952 on farmland adjacent to ancient forest and clear‐felled in 1997.</p></abstract><abstract><p>Methods: Shade‐tolerant forest herbs were surveyed in 112 grid‐based sample plots: just before clear‐felling, and 5 and 10 yr afterwards. Shade‐tolerant herbs were subdivided into ancient forest species (AFS) and other shade‐tolerant species (OSS). Effects of clear‐felling on species number per plot, total cover per plot and colonization rate of species groups were compared using non‐parametrical tests. Species number per plot was modelled by means of generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs), with inventory time, distance to the nearest parcel edge, and cover of light‐loving species (LS) as explanatory variables. The C‐S‐R signature (competitive, stress‐tolerant and ruderal strategies, respectively) shift of sample plots was calculated on the selected shade‐tolerant species.</p></abstract><abstract><p>Results: Frequency of most species increased during the 10‐yr period. Number of OSS increased more and faster than that of AFS. OSS increased to the level of the adjacent forest, but was lower where LS cover remained high. There was a positive correlation between the change of the colonization rate and the competitive plant strategy.</p></abstract><abstract><p>Conclusions: We assume that clear‐felling stimulated generative reproduction of shade‐tolerant herbs, whereas quickly emerging woody species controlled competitive exclusion by LS. Succession of dark and light phases, such as provided by an understorey managed as a coppice, could promote colonization of shade‐tolerant herbs into post‐agricultural forest.</p></abstract><textClass xml:lang="en"><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>keywords</head><item><term>Clearcutting</term></item><item><term>Ellenberg indicator value for light</term></item><item><term>Herbaceous layer</term></item><item><term>Plant species migration</term></item><item><term>Populus×canadensis</term></item><item><term>Secondary succession</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2011-02">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/10B812D192B26CD5ABEBB4F1F25AC73262774BD9/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1654-109X</doi><issn type="print">1402-2001</issn><issn type="electronic">1654-109X</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="AVSC"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="APPLIED VEGETATION SCIENCE">Applied Vegetation Science</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="02101"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/avsc.2011.14.issue-1</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="14">14</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="1">1</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2011-02">February 2011</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="8" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1654-109X.2010.01101.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="AVSC1101"></id><id type="supplier" value="1101"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="9"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><copyright>© 2010 International Association for Vegetation Science</copyright><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2011-01-14"></event><event type="publishedOnlineAcceptedOrEarlyUnpaginated" date="2010-07-29"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.4.2 mode:FullText" date="2011-01-14"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2011-01-14"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-15"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-15"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="75">75</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="83">83</numbering></numberingGroup><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:AVSC.AVSC1101.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory>Received 21 September 2009Accepted 14 June 2010</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="4"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="2"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="3"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="39"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="6519"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="65"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Clear‐felling effects on colonization rates of shade‐tolerant forest herbs into a post‐agricultural forest adjacent to ancient forest</title><title type="shortAuthors">L. De Keersmaeker et al.</title><title type="short">Clear‐fell effects on colonization by forest herbs</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Luc</givenNames><familyName>De Keersmaeker</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Kris</givenNames><familyName>Vandekerkhove</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Arne</givenNames><familyName>Verstraeten</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Lander</givenNames><familyName>Baeten</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr5" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Pieter</givenNames><familyName>Verschelde</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr6" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Arno</givenNames><familyName>Thomaes</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr7" affiliationRef="#a3"><personName><givenNames>Martin</givenNames><familyName>Hermy</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr8" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Kris</givenNames><familyName>Verheyen</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="BE"><unparsedAffiliation>Research Institute for Nature and Forest (INBO), Gaverstraat 4, B–9500 Geraardsbergen, Belgium</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="BE"><unparsedAffiliation>Laboratory of Forestry, Ghent University, Geraardsbergse Steenweg 267, B–9090 Gontrode (Melle), Belgium</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a3" countryCode="BE"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Earth & Environmental Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200E, B–3001 Leuven, Belgium</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">Clearcutting</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">Ellenberg indicator value for light</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">Herbaceous layer</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">Plant species migration</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5"><i>Populus</i>×<i>canadensis</i></keyword><keyword xml:id="k6">Secondary succession</keyword></keywordGroup><supportingInformation><p><b>Appendix S1.</b> Number of shoots of trees and shrubs (per ha) in 38 sample plots in the study parcel, 10 yr after clear‐felling. The inventoried sample plots were systematically selected from the grid cells, in which shade‐tolerant species were monitored (Fig. 1). Regeneration is subdivided into eight dimension classes, based on diameter (D, in cm) and height (H, in cm). Percentages of coppice shoots are in parentheses.</p><p><b>Appendix S2.</b> Presence (%), median cover (%) or median abundance class, and colonization rate (<i>CR</i>), of 25 shade‐tolerant herbs in sample plots in the study parcel (<i>n</i>=112) and in the adjacent forest (<i>n</i>=33). The cover and abundance classes are explained in the Material and Methods section. Species were recorded before clear‐felling (1997) and 5 y (2002) and 10 yr (2007) afterwards. Ancient forest species are indicated by <sup>*</sup>. Different superscripted letters within a row indicate significantly (<i>P</i><0.05) different values.</p><p><b>Appendix S3.</b> Number of all shade‐tolerant herb species (open circles, size of circle corresponding to number of species as indicated in legend), and ancient forest herb species (closed symbols, see legend), and C‐S‐R signature of sample plots in the clear‐felled area at three inventory times.</p><p><b>Appendix S4.</b> Modelled (lines) and observed (circles) number of herbaceous ancient forest species (AFS) and shade‐tolerant herbs not listed as ancient forest species (OSS), as a function of the distance to the nearest parcel edge (Distance) and the cover by light‐loving herbs (LS). Overlap of circles is reduced by vertical noise; circle size is a function of the observed LS cover. Predicted values are fixed at median and quartile levels of LS cover.</p><p><b>Photo S1</b>: Colonization of a declining poplar plantation in Muizen forest by <i>Ranunculus ficaria</i>. This fast‐colonizing forest species is dominant under the shade of shrubs where <i>Urtica dioica</i> and <i>Rubus fruticosus</i> agg. are suppressed.</p><p>Please note: Wiley‐Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting materials supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than about missing material) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.</p><supportingInfoItem><mediaResource alt="supporting info item" href="urn-x:wiley:14022001:media:avsc1101:AVSC_1101_sm_appendices"></mediaResource><caption>Supporting info item</caption></supportingInfoItem><supportingInfoItem><mediaResource alt="supporting info item" href="urn-x:wiley:14022001:media:avsc1101:AVSC_1101_sm_photo-s1"></mediaResource><caption>Supporting info item</caption></supportingInfoItem></supportingInformation><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">Abstract</title><p><b>Question: </b> Does clear‐felling influence forest herb colonization into post‐agricultural forest?</p><p><b>Location: </b> A stand of poplar cultivars with a dense understorey of <i>Acer pseudoplatanus</i> in Muizen forest (northern Belgium), planted in 1952 on farmland adjacent to ancient forest and clear‐felled in 1997.</p><p><b>Methods: </b> Shade‐tolerant forest herbs were surveyed in 112 grid‐based sample plots: just before clear‐felling, and 5 and 10 yr afterwards. Shade‐tolerant herbs were subdivided into ancient forest species (AFS) and other shade‐tolerant species (OSS). Effects of clear‐felling on species number per plot, total cover per plot and colonization rate of species groups were compared using non‐parametrical tests. Species number per plot was modelled by means of generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs), with inventory time, distance to the nearest parcel edge, and cover of light‐loving species (LS) as explanatory variables. The C‐S‐R signature (competitive, stress‐tolerant and ruderal strategies, respectively) shift of sample plots was calculated on the selected shade‐tolerant species.</p><p><b>Results: </b> Frequency of most species increased during the 10‐yr period. Number of OSS increased more and faster than that of AFS. OSS increased to the level of the adjacent forest, but was lower where LS cover remained high. There was a positive correlation between the change of the colonization rate and the competitive plant strategy.</p><p><b>Conclusions: </b> We assume that clear‐felling stimulated generative reproduction of shade‐tolerant herbs, whereas quickly emerging woody species controlled competitive exclusion by LS. Succession of dark and light phases, such as provided by an understorey managed as a coppice, could promote colonization of shade‐tolerant herbs into post‐agricultural forest.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta><noteGroup><note xml:id="fn1"><p><b>De Keersmaeker, L.</b> (corresponding author, <email normalForm="luc.dekeersmaeker@inbo.be">luc.dekeersmaeker@inbo.be</email>), <b>Vandekerkhove, K.</b> (<email normalForm="kris.vandekerkhove@inbo.be">kris.vandekerkhove@inbo.be</email>), <b>Verstraeten, A.</b> (<email normalForm="arne.verstraeten@inbo.be">arne.verstraeten@inbo.be</email>), <b>Verschelde, P.</b> (<email normalForm="pieter.verschelde@inbo.be">pieter.verschelde@inbo.be</email>) & <b>Thomaes, A.</b> (<email normalForm="arno.thomaes@inbo.be">arno.thomaes@inbo.be</email>): Research Institute for Nature and Forest (INBO), Gaverstraat 4, B–9500 Geraardsbergen, Belgium
<b>Baeten, L.</b> (<email normalForm="lander.baeten@UGent.be">lander.baeten@UGent.be</email>) & <b>Verheyen, K.</b> (<email normalForm="kris.verheyen@UGent.be">kris.verheyen@UGent.be</email>): Laboratory of Forestry, Ghent University, Geraardsbergse Steenweg 267, B–9090 Gontrode (Melle), Belgium
<b>Hermy, M.</b> (<email normalForm="martin.hermy@ees.kuleuven.be">martin.hermy@ees.kuleuven.be</email>): Department of Earth & Environmental Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200E, B–3001 Leuven, Belgium</p></note><note xml:id="fn2"><p>Co‐ordinating Editor: Amy Symstad</p></note></noteGroup></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Clear‐felling effects on colonization rates of shade‐tolerant forest herbs into a post‐agricultural forest adjacent to ancient forest</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Clear‐fell effects on colonization by forest herbs</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Clear‐felling effects on colonization rates of shade‐tolerant forest herbs into a post‐agricultural forest adjacent to ancient forest</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Luc</namePart><namePart type="family">De Keersmaeker</namePart><affiliation>Research Institute for Nature and Forest (INBO), Gaverstraat 4, B–9500 Geraardsbergen, Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Kris</namePart><namePart type="family">Vandekerkhove</namePart><affiliation>Research Institute for Nature and Forest (INBO), Gaverstraat 4, B–9500 Geraardsbergen, Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Arne</namePart><namePart type="family">Verstraeten</namePart><affiliation>Research Institute for Nature and Forest (INBO), Gaverstraat 4, B–9500 Geraardsbergen, Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Lander</namePart><namePart type="family">Baeten</namePart><affiliation>Laboratory of Forestry, Ghent University, Geraardsbergse Steenweg 267, B–9090 Gontrode (Melle), Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Pieter</namePart><namePart type="family">Verschelde</namePart><affiliation>Research Institute for Nature and Forest (INBO), Gaverstraat 4, B–9500 Geraardsbergen, Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Arno</namePart><namePart type="family">Thomaes</namePart><affiliation>Research Institute for Nature and Forest (INBO), Gaverstraat 4, B–9500 Geraardsbergen, Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Martin</namePart><namePart type="family">Hermy</namePart><affiliation>Department of Earth & Environmental Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200E, B–3001 Leuven, Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Kris</namePart><namePart type="family">Verheyen</namePart><affiliation>Laboratory of Forestry, Ghent University, Geraardsbergse Steenweg 267, B–9090 Gontrode (Melle), Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2011-02</dateIssued><edition>Received 21 September 2009Accepted 14 June 2010</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType><extent unit="figures">4</extent><extent unit="tables">2</extent><extent unit="formulas">3</extent><extent unit="references">39</extent><extent unit="words">6519</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Question: Does clear‐felling influence forest herb colonization into post‐agricultural forest?</abstract><abstract>Location: A stand of poplar cultivars with a dense understorey of Acer pseudoplatanus in Muizen forest (northern Belgium), planted in 1952 on farmland adjacent to ancient forest and clear‐felled in 1997.</abstract><abstract>Methods: Shade‐tolerant forest herbs were surveyed in 112 grid‐based sample plots: just before clear‐felling, and 5 and 10 yr afterwards. Shade‐tolerant herbs were subdivided into ancient forest species (AFS) and other shade‐tolerant species (OSS). Effects of clear‐felling on species number per plot, total cover per plot and colonization rate of species groups were compared using non‐parametrical tests. Species number per plot was modelled by means of generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs), with inventory time, distance to the nearest parcel edge, and cover of light‐loving species (LS) as explanatory variables. The C‐S‐R signature (competitive, stress‐tolerant and ruderal strategies, respectively) shift of sample plots was calculated on the selected shade‐tolerant species.</abstract><abstract>Results: Frequency of most species increased during the 10‐yr period. Number of OSS increased more and faster than that of AFS. OSS increased to the level of the adjacent forest, but was lower where LS cover remained high. There was a positive correlation between the change of the colonization rate and the competitive plant strategy.</abstract><abstract>Conclusions: We assume that clear‐felling stimulated generative reproduction of shade‐tolerant herbs, whereas quickly emerging woody species controlled competitive exclusion by LS. Succession of dark and light phases, such as provided by an understorey managed as a coppice, could promote colonization of shade‐tolerant herbs into post‐agricultural forest.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>Clearcutting</topic><topic>Ellenberg indicator value for light</topic><topic>Herbaceous layer</topic><topic>Plant species migration</topic><topic>Populus×canadensis</topic><topic>Secondary succession</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Applied Vegetation Science</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><note type="content"> Appendix S1. Number of shoots of trees and shrubs (per ha) in 38 sample plots in the study parcel, 10 yr after clear‐felling. The inventoried sample plots were systematically selected from the grid cells, in which shade‐tolerant species were monitored (Fig. 1). Regeneration is subdivided into eight dimension classes, based on diameter (D, in cm) and height (H, in cm). Percentages of coppice shoots are in parentheses. Appendix S2. Presence (%), median cover (%) or median abundance class, and colonization rate (CR), of 25 shade‐tolerant herbs in sample plots in the study parcel (n=112) and in the adjacent forest (n=33). The cover and abundance classes are explained in the Material and Methods section. Species were recorded before clear‐felling (1997) and 5 y (2002) and 10 yr (2007) afterwards. Ancient forest species are indicated by *. Different superscripted letters within a row indicate significantly (P<0.05) different values. Appendix S3. Number of all shade‐tolerant herb species (open circles, size of circle corresponding to number of species as indicated in legend), and ancient forest herb species (closed symbols, see legend), and C‐S‐R signature of sample plots in the clear‐felled area at three inventory times. Appendix S4. Modelled (lines) and observed (circles) number of herbaceous ancient forest species (AFS) and shade‐tolerant herbs not listed as ancient forest species (OSS), as a function of the distance to the nearest parcel edge (Distance) and the cover by light‐loving herbs (LS). Overlap of circles is reduced by vertical noise; circle size is a function of the observed LS cover. Predicted values are fixed at median and quartile levels of LS cover. Photo S1: Colonization of a declining poplar plantation in Muizen forest by Ranunculus ficaria. This fast‐colonizing forest species is dominant under the shade of shrubs where Urtica dioica and Rubus fruticosus agg. are suppressed. Please note: Wiley‐Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting materials supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than about missing material) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article. Appendix S1. Number of shoots of trees and shrubs (per ha) in 38 sample plots in the study parcel, 10 yr after clear‐felling. The inventoried sample plots were systematically selected from the grid cells, in which shade‐tolerant species were monitored (Fig. 1). Regeneration is subdivided into eight dimension classes, based on diameter (D, in cm) and height (H, in cm). Percentages of coppice shoots are in parentheses. Appendix S2. Presence (%), median cover (%) or median abundance class, and colonization rate (CR), of 25 shade‐tolerant herbs in sample plots in the study parcel (n=112) and in the adjacent forest (n=33). The cover and abundance classes are explained in the Material and Methods section. Species were recorded before clear‐felling (1997) and 5 y (2002) and 10 yr (2007) afterwards. Ancient forest species are indicated by *. Different superscripted letters within a row indicate significantly (P<0.05) different values. Appendix S3. Number of all shade‐tolerant herb species (open circles, size of circle corresponding to number of species as indicated in legend), and ancient forest herb species (closed symbols, see legend), and C‐S‐R signature of sample plots in the clear‐felled area at three inventory times. Appendix S4. Modelled (lines) and observed (circles) number of herbaceous ancient forest species (AFS) and shade‐tolerant herbs not listed as ancient forest species (OSS), as a function of the distance to the nearest parcel edge (Distance) and the cover by light‐loving herbs (LS). Overlap of circles is reduced by vertical noise; circle size is a function of the observed LS cover. Predicted values are fixed at median and quartile levels of LS cover. Photo S1: Colonization of a declining poplar plantation in Muizen forest by Ranunculus ficaria. This fast‐colonizing forest species is dominant under the shade of shrubs where Urtica dioica and Rubus fruticosus agg. are suppressed. Please note: Wiley‐Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting materials supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than about missing material) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article. Appendix S1. Number of shoots of trees and shrubs (per ha) in 38 sample plots in the study parcel, 10 yr after clear‐felling. The inventoried sample plots were systematically selected from the grid cells, in which shade‐tolerant species were monitored (Fig. 1). Regeneration is subdivided into eight dimension classes, based on diameter (D, in cm) and height (H, in cm). Percentages of coppice shoots are in parentheses. Appendix S2. Presence (%), median cover (%) or median abundance class, and colonization rate (CR), of 25 shade‐tolerant herbs in sample plots in the study parcel (n=112) and in the adjacent forest (n=33). The cover and abundance classes are explained in the Material and Methods section. Species were recorded before clear‐felling (1997) and 5 y (2002) and 10 yr (2007) afterwards. Ancient forest species are indicated by *. Different superscripted letters within a row indicate significantly (P<0.05) different values. Appendix S3. Number of all shade‐tolerant herb species (open circles, size of circle corresponding to number of species as indicated in legend), and ancient forest herb species (closed symbols, see legend), and C‐S‐R signature of sample plots in the clear‐felled area at three inventory times. Appendix S4. Modelled (lines) and observed (circles) number of herbaceous ancient forest species (AFS) and shade‐tolerant herbs not listed as ancient forest species (OSS), as a function of the distance to the nearest parcel edge (Distance) and the cover by light‐loving herbs (LS). Overlap of circles is reduced by vertical noise; circle size is a function of the observed LS cover. Predicted values are fixed at median and quartile levels of LS cover. Photo S1: Colonization of a declining poplar plantation in Muizen forest by Ranunculus ficaria. This fast‐colonizing forest species is dominant under the shade of shrubs where Urtica dioica and Rubus fruticosus agg. are suppressed. Please note: Wiley‐Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting materials supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than about missing material) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article. Appendix S1. Number of shoots of trees and shrubs (per ha) in 38 sample plots in the study parcel, 10 yr after clear‐felling. The inventoried sample plots were systematically selected from the grid cells, in which shade‐tolerant species were monitored (Fig. 1). Regeneration is subdivided into eight dimension classes, based on diameter (D, in cm) and height (H, in cm). Percentages of coppice shoots are in parentheses. Appendix S2. Presence (%), median cover (%) or median abundance class, and colonization rate (CR), of 25 shade‐tolerant herbs in sample plots in the study parcel (n=112) and in the adjacent forest (n=33). The cover and abundance classes are explained in the Material and Methods section. Species were recorded before clear‐felling (1997) and 5 y (2002) and 10 yr (2007) afterwards. Ancient forest species are indicated by *. Different superscripted letters within a row indicate significantly (P<0.05) different values. Appendix S3. Number of all shade‐tolerant herb species (open circles, size of circle corresponding to number of species as indicated in legend), and ancient forest herb species (closed symbols, see legend), and C‐S‐R signature of sample plots in the clear‐felled area at three inventory times. Appendix S4. Modelled (lines) and observed (circles) number of herbaceous ancient forest species (AFS) and shade‐tolerant herbs not listed as ancient forest species (OSS), as a function of the distance to the nearest parcel edge (Distance) and the cover by light‐loving herbs (LS). Overlap of circles is reduced by vertical noise; circle size is a function of the observed LS cover. Predicted values are fixed at median and quartile levels of LS cover. Photo S1: Colonization of a declining poplar plantation in Muizen forest by Ranunculus ficaria. This fast‐colonizing forest species is dominant under the shade of shrubs where Urtica dioica and Rubus fruticosus agg. are suppressed. Please note: Wiley‐Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting materials supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than about missing material) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article. Appendix S1. Number of shoots of trees and shrubs (per ha) in 38 sample plots in the study parcel, 10 yr after clear‐felling. The inventoried sample plots were systematically selected from the grid cells, in which shade‐tolerant species were monitored (Fig. 1). Regeneration is subdivided into eight dimension classes, based on diameter (D, in cm) and height (H, in cm). Percentages of coppice shoots are in parentheses. Appendix S2. Presence (%), median cover (%) or median abundance class, and colonization rate (CR), of 25 shade‐tolerant herbs in sample plots in the study parcel (n=112) and in the adjacent forest (n=33). The cover and abundance classes are explained in the Material and Methods section. Species were recorded before clear‐felling (1997) and 5 y (2002) and 10 yr (2007) afterwards. Ancient forest species are indicated by *. Different superscripted letters within a row indicate significantly (P<0.05) different values. Appendix S3. Number of all shade‐tolerant herb species (open circles, size of circle corresponding to number of species as indicated in legend), and ancient forest herb species (closed symbols, see legend), and C‐S‐R signature of sample plots in the clear‐felled area at three inventory times. Appendix S4. Modelled (lines) and observed (circles) number of herbaceous ancient forest species (AFS) and shade‐tolerant herbs not listed as ancient forest species (OSS), as a function of the distance to the nearest parcel edge (Distance) and the cover by light‐loving herbs (LS). Overlap of circles is reduced by vertical noise; circle size is a function of the observed LS cover. Predicted values are fixed at median and quartile levels of LS cover. Photo S1: Colonization of a declining poplar plantation in Muizen forest by Ranunculus ficaria. This fast‐colonizing forest species is dominant under the shade of shrubs where Urtica dioica and Rubus fruticosus agg. are suppressed. Please note: Wiley‐Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting materials supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than about missing material) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article. Appendix S1. Number of shoots of trees and shrubs (per ha) in 38 sample plots in the study parcel, 10 yr after clear‐felling. The inventoried sample plots were systematically selected from the grid cells, in which shade‐tolerant species were monitored (Fig. 1). Regeneration is subdivided into eight dimension classes, based on diameter (D, in cm) and height (H, in cm). Percentages of coppice shoots are in parentheses. Appendix S2. Presence (%), median cover (%) or median abundance class, and colonization rate (CR), of 25 shade‐tolerant herbs in sample plots in the study parcel (n=112) and in the adjacent forest (n=33). The cover and abundance classes are explained in the Material and Methods section. Species were recorded before clear‐felling (1997) and 5 y (2002) and 10 yr (2007) afterwards. Ancient forest species are indicated by *. Different superscripted letters within a row indicate significantly (P<0.05) different values. Appendix S3. Number of all shade‐tolerant herb species (open circles, size of circle corresponding to number of species as indicated in legend), and ancient forest herb species (closed symbols, see legend), and C‐S‐R signature of sample plots in the clear‐felled area at three inventory times. Appendix S4. Modelled (lines) and observed (circles) number of herbaceous ancient forest species (AFS) and shade‐tolerant herbs not listed as ancient forest species (OSS), as a function of the distance to the nearest parcel edge (Distance) and the cover by light‐loving herbs (LS). Overlap of circles is reduced by vertical noise; circle size is a function of the observed LS cover. Predicted values are fixed at median and quartile levels of LS cover. Photo S1: Colonization of a declining poplar plantation in Muizen forest by Ranunculus ficaria. This fast‐colonizing forest species is dominant under the shade of shrubs where Urtica dioica and Rubus fruticosus agg. are suppressed. Please note: Wiley‐Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting materials supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than about missing material) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.Supporting Info Item: Supporting info item - Supporting info item - </note><identifier type="ISSN">1402-2001</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1654-109X</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1654-109X</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">AVSC</identifier><part><date>2011</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>14</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>1</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>75</start><end>83</end><total>9</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">10B812D192B26CD5ABEBB4F1F25AC73262774BD9</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1654-109X.2010.01101.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">AVSC1101</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2010 International Association for Vegetation Science</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource>WILEY</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Bois/explor/CheneBelgiqueV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001499 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001499 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Bois
|area= CheneBelgiqueV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:10B812D192B26CD5ABEBB4F1F25AC73262774BD9
|texte= Clear‐felling effects on colonization rates of shade‐tolerant forest herbs into a post‐agricultural forest adjacent to ancient forest
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.27. |  |