Conservation biogeography of large Mediterranean islands. Butterfly impoverishment, conservation priorities and inferences for an ecologica “island paradigm”
Identifieur interne : 001484 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 001483; suivant : 001485Conservation biogeography of large Mediterranean islands. Butterfly impoverishment, conservation priorities and inferences for an ecologica “island paradigm”
Auteurs : Leonardo Dapporto ; Roger L. H. DennisSource :
- Ecography [ 0906-7590 ] ; 2009-02.
Abstract
Conservation biogeography is considered the Cinderella of biological conservation. Nevertheless biogeography provides the basis for establishing species distributions over space and time, therefore conservation priorities among areas and individual species. We demonstrate that there is no need to simplify analyses by using subsets of species (rare species, endemics) as surrogates. In doing so, we apply strict biogeographical techniques to determine butterfly impoverishment on three of the west Mediterranean's largest islands (Sardinia, Corsica and Sicily). The analyses performed on species, both collectively and individually, reveal that regional species richness in the Mediterranean zone can be largely predicted by latitude, altitude and latitudinal range (maximum minus minimum latitude), but that Sardinia and Corsica have clearly impoverished faunas. Logistic regression at individual species level demonstrates that several species, predicted to be present in these islands on the basis of their continental distributions, are actually absent. When compared with species that are present in these islands, such missing species are disclosed as having ecological traits which reduce their colonization capability. Probabilities of occurrence are calculated for each species on each island; they reflect the potential for each butterfly species to migrate to and colonise each island, and can be considered as a measure of conservation value. As such, species present on islands but having low immigration probabilities are predicted to represent isolated populations from the mainland that are unlikely to re‐colonize the islands in the case of extinction. Island endemic species and races are shown to have lower occurrence probabilities compared to widespread species occurring on islands and illustrate the usefulness of occurrence probabilities for identifying isolated populations in need of conservation attention.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2008.05600.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:5CAB7C46FEA2FF2B164A97390D400DE6C0BD9E3ALe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Conservation biogeography of large Mediterranean islands. Butterfly impoverishment, conservation priorities and inferences for an ecologica “island paradigm”</title><author><name sortKey="Dapporto, Leonardo" sort="Dapporto, Leonardo" uniqKey="Dapporto L" first="Leonardo" last="Dapporto">Leonardo Dapporto</name></author><author><name sortKey="Dennis, Roger L H" sort="Dennis, Roger L H" uniqKey="Dennis R" first="Roger L. H." last="Dennis">Roger L. H. Dennis</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:5CAB7C46FEA2FF2B164A97390D400DE6C0BD9E3A</idno><date when="2009" year="2009">2009</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1600-0587.2008.05600.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/5CAB7C46FEA2FF2B164A97390D400DE6C0BD9E3A/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001484</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001484</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Conservation biogeography of large Mediterranean islands. Butterfly impoverishment, conservation priorities and inferences for an ecologica “island paradigm”</title><author><name sortKey="Dapporto, Leonardo" sort="Dapporto, Leonardo" uniqKey="Dapporto L" first="Leonardo" last="Dapporto">Leonardo Dapporto</name></author><author><name sortKey="Dennis, Roger L H" sort="Dennis, Roger L H" uniqKey="Dennis R" first="Roger L. H." last="Dennis">Roger L. H. Dennis</name></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Ecography</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">Ecography</title><idno type="ISSN">0906-7590</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0587</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2009-02">2009-02</date><biblScope unit="volume">32</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="169">169</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="179">179</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0906-7590</idno></series><idno type="istex">5CAB7C46FEA2FF2B164A97390D400DE6C0BD9E3A</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0587.2008.05600.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">ECOG5600</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0906-7590</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Conservation biogeography is considered the Cinderella of biological conservation. Nevertheless biogeography provides the basis for establishing species distributions over space and time, therefore conservation priorities among areas and individual species. We demonstrate that there is no need to simplify analyses by using subsets of species (rare species, endemics) as surrogates. In doing so, we apply strict biogeographical techniques to determine butterfly impoverishment on three of the west Mediterranean's largest islands (Sardinia, Corsica and Sicily). The analyses performed on species, both collectively and individually, reveal that regional species richness in the Mediterranean zone can be largely predicted by latitude, altitude and latitudinal range (maximum minus minimum latitude), but that Sardinia and Corsica have clearly impoverished faunas. Logistic regression at individual species level demonstrates that several species, predicted to be present in these islands on the basis of their continental distributions, are actually absent. When compared with species that are present in these islands, such missing species are disclosed as having ecological traits which reduce their colonization capability. Probabilities of occurrence are calculated for each species on each island; they reflect the potential for each butterfly species to migrate to and colonise each island, and can be considered as a measure of conservation value. As such, species present on islands but having low immigration probabilities are predicted to represent isolated populations from the mainland that are unlikely to re‐colonize the islands in the case of extinction. Island endemic species and races are shown to have lower occurrence probabilities compared to widespread species occurring on islands and illustrate the usefulness of occurrence probabilities for identifying isolated populations in need of conservation attention.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Leonardo Dapporto</name></json:item><json:item><name>Roger L. H. Dennis</name></json:item></author><articleId><json:string>ECOG5600</json:string></articleId><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Conservation biogeography is considered the Cinderella of biological conservation. Nevertheless biogeography provides the basis for establishing species distributions over space and time, therefore conservation priorities among areas and individual species. We demonstrate that there is no need to simplify analyses by using subsets of species (rare species, endemics) as surrogates. In doing so, we apply strict biogeographical techniques to determine butterfly impoverishment on three of the west Mediterranean's largest islands (Sardinia, Corsica and Sicily). The analyses performed on species, both collectively and individually, reveal that regional species richness in the Mediterranean zone can be largely predicted by latitude, altitude and latitudinal range (maximum minus minimum latitude), but that Sardinia and Corsica have clearly impoverished faunas. Logistic regression at individual species level demonstrates that several species, predicted to be present in these islands on the basis of their continental distributions, are actually absent. When compared with species that are present in these islands, such missing species are disclosed as having ecological traits which reduce their colonization capability. Probabilities of occurrence are calculated for each species on each island; they reflect the potential for each butterfly species to migrate to and colonise each island, and can be considered as a measure of conservation value. As such, species present on islands but having low immigration probabilities are predicted to represent isolated populations from the mainland that are unlikely to re‐colonize the islands in the case of extinction. Island endemic species and races are shown to have lower occurrence probabilities compared to widespread species occurring on islands and illustrate the usefulness of occurrence probabilities for identifying isolated populations in need of conservation attention.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>8</score><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>595 x 782 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractCharCount>1934</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>7205</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>47963</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>11</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>269</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Conservation biogeography of large Mediterranean islands. Butterfly impoverishment, conservation priorities and inferences for an ecologica “island paradigm”</title><refBibs><json:item><author><json:item><name>W. Alvarez</name></json:item></author><host><volume>235</volume><pages><last>105</last><first>103</first></pages><author></author><title>Nature</title></host><title>Rotation of the Corsica‐Sardinia microplate</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J. Aubert</name></json:item></author><host><volume>60</volume><pages><last>492</last><first>467</first></pages><author></author><title>Biol. J. Linn. Soc</title></host><title>Ecology and genetics of interspecific hybridization in the swallowtails, Papilio hospiton Géné and P. machaon L., in Corsica (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae)</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>E. Balletto</name></json:item></author><host><volume>16</volume><pages><last>263</last><first>259</first></pages><author></author><title>Memorie del Museo civico di Storia Naturale di Verona</title></host><title>Checklist e distribuzione della fauna italiana. 10.000 specie terrestri e delle acque interne: Insecta Lepidoptera Papilionoidea (Rhopalocera)</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>A. Bonn</name></json:item></author><host><volume>5</volume><pages><last>741</last><first>733</first></pages><author></author><title>Ecol. Lett</title></host><title>Threatened and endemic species: are they good indicators of patterns of biodiversity on a national scale?</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>G. Brusseaux</name></json:item><json:item><name>J. Nel</name></json:item></author><host><volume>13</volume><pages><last>145</last><first>1</first></pages><author></author><title>Rev. l'Assoc. Rousillonnaise Entomologie</title></host><title>Révision de la liste‐inventaire de Charles E. E. Rungs (1988) des Lépidoptères de Corse</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>R. Cianchi</name></json:item></author><host><volume>12</volume><pages><last>1471</last><first>1461</first></pages><author></author><title>Mol. Ecol</title></host><title>Differential patterns of hybridization and introgression between the swallowtails Papilio machaon and P‐hospiton from Sardinia and Corsica islands (Lepidoptera, Papilionidae)</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>L. Dapporto</name></json:item></author><host><volume>46</volume><pages><last>230</last><first>224</first></pages><author></author><title>J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res</title></host><title>Geometric morphometrics reveal male genitalia differences in the Lasiommata megera/paramegaera complex (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae) and the lack of a predicted hybridization area in the Tuscan Archipelago</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>L. Dapporto</name></json:item><json:item><name>R. L. H. Dennis</name></json:item></author><host><volume>35</volume><pages><last>674</last><first>664</first></pages><author></author><title>J. Biogeogr</title></host><title>Species' richness, rarity and endemicity of Italian offshore islands: complementary signals from island‐focused and species‐focused analyses</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>L. Dapporto</name></json:item><json:item><name>R. L. H. Dennis</name></json:item></author><host><volume>12</volume><pages><last>249</last><first>237</first></pages><author></author><title>J. Insect Conserv</title></host><title>Island size is not the only consideration. Ranking priorities for the conservation of butterflies on Italian offshore islands</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>L. Dapporto</name></json:item></author><host><volume>16 suppl</volume><pages><last>118</last><first>111</first></pages><author></author><title>Quad. Stud. Nat. Romagna</title></host><title>Segnalazioni di alcuni Lepidotteri rinvenuti nel Parco Naturale della Maremma e considerazioni biogeografiche</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>L. M. Dávalos</name></json:item></author><host><volume>34</volume><pages><last>375</last><first>364</first></pages><author></author><title>J. Biogeogr</title></host><title>Short‐faced bats (Phyllostomidae: Stenodermatina): a Caribbean radiation of strict frugivores</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>R. L. H. Dennis</name></json:item></author><host><author></author><title>Their origin and establishment</title></host><title>The British butterflies</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>R. L. H. Dennis</name></json:item></author><host><volume>1</volume><pages><last>63</last><first>43</first></pages><author></author><title>J. Insect Conserr</title></host><title>An inflated conservation load for European butterflies: increases in rarity and endemism accompany increases in species richness</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Dennis, R. L. H. and Shreeve, T. G.. 1996. Butterflies on British and Irish offshore islands. Gem Publ.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>R. L. H. Dennis</name></json:item><json:item><name>T. G. Shreeve</name></json:item></author><host><volume>60</volume><pages><last>275</last><first>257</first></pages><author></author><title>Biol. J. Linn. Soc</title></host><title>Diversity of butterfly species on British islands: ecological influences underlying the roles of area, isolation and faunal source</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>R. L. H. Dennis</name></json:item></author><host><volume>27</volume><pages><last>1384</last><first>1365</first></pages><author></author><title>J. Biogeogr</title></host><title>Contemporary geography dominates butterfly diversity gradients within the Aegean archipelago (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea, Hesperioidea)</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>R. L. H. Dennis</name></json:item></author><host><volume>12</volume><pages><last>236</last><first>205</first></pages><author></author><title>J. Insect Conserv</title></host><title>Butterflies of European islands: the implications of the geography and ecology of rarity and endemicity for conservation</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>H. Descimon</name></json:item><json:item><name>J. Mallet</name></json:item></author><host><author></author><title>Ecology of butterflies in Europe</title></host><title>Bad species in European butterflies</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J. M. Diamond</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>444</last><first>342</first></pages><author></author><title>Ecology and evolution of communities</title></host><title>Assembly of species communities</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>S. Fattorini</name></json:item></author><host><volume>9</volume><pages><last>83</last><first>75</first></pages><author></author><title>Anim. Conserv</title></host><title>A new method to identify important conservation areas applied to the butterflies of the Aegean islands (Greece)</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>E. García‐Barros</name></json:item></author><host><volume>11</volume><pages><last>228</last><first>1</first></pages><author></author><title>Monogr. Soc. Entomol. Aragonesa</title></host><title>Atlas de las mariposas diurnas de la Península Ibérica e islas Baleares (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea and Hesperioidea)</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>A. Grill</name></json:item></author><host><volume>10</volume><pages><last>60</last><first>51</first></pages><author></author><title>J. Nat. Conserv</title></host><title>Applying the IUCN categories to island endemics: Sardinian butterflies (Italy)</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>L. R. Heaney</name></json:item></author><host><volume>34</volume><pages><last>757</last><first>753</first></pages><author></author><title>J. Biogeogr</title></host><title>Is a new paradigm emerging for oceanic island biogeography?</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Higgins, L. G. and Riley, N. D.. 1983. A Field guide to the butterflies of Britain and Europe. Collins.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>N. J. B. Isaac</name></json:item></author><host><volume>19</volume><pages><last>469</last><first>464</first></pages><author></author><title>Trends Ecol. Evol</title></host><title>Taxonomic inflation: Its influence on macroecology and conservation</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>O. Kudrna</name></json:item></author><host><volume>20</volume><pages><last>343</last><first>1</first></pages><author></author><title>Oedippus</title></host><title>The distribution atlas of European butterflies</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Lafranchis, T.. 2000. Les papillons de jour de France, Belgique et Luxembourg et leurs chenilles. Collection Parthénope, éditions Biotope, Mèze.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>F. Lloret</name></json:item></author><host><volume>13</volume><pages><last>45</last><first>37</first></pages><author></author><title>Global Ecol. Biogeogr</title></host><title>Local and regional abundance of exotic plant species on Mediterranean islands: are species traits important?</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. V. Lomolino</name></json:item></author><host><volume>28</volume><pages><last>21</last><first>1</first></pages><author></author><title>Biol. J. Linn. Soc</title></host><title>Mammalian community structure on islands: immigration, extinction and interactive effects</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. V. Lomolino</name></json:item></author><host><volume>9</volume><pages><last>58</last><first>39</first></pages><author></author><title>Global Ecol. Biogeogr</title></host><title>A species‐based theory of insular zoogeography</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>F. D. Lozano</name></json:item></author><host><volume>16</volume><pages><last>4050</last><first>4039</first></pages><author></author><title>Biodivers. Conserv</title></host><title>Effects of dynamic taxonomy on rare species and conservation listing: insights from the Iberian vascular flora</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>MacArthur, R. H. and Wilson, E. O.. 1967. The theory of island biogeography. Princeton Univ. Press.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J. Mallet</name></json:item></author><host><volume>10</volume><pages><last>299</last><first>294</first></pages><author></author><title>Trends Ecol. Evol</title></host><title>A species definition for the modern synthesis</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Mayr, E.. 1942. Systematics and the origin of species from the viewpoint of a zoologist. Columbia Univ. Press.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>G. J. McInerny</name></json:item></author><host><volume>20</volume><pages><last>567</last><first>562</first></pages><author></author><title>Conserv. Biol</title></host><title>Significance of sighting rate in inferring extinction and threat</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J. M. McPherson</name></json:item><json:item><name>W. Jetz</name></json:item></author><host><volume>30</volume><pages><last>151</last><first>135</first></pages><author></author><title>Ecography</title></host><title>Effects of species’ ecology on the accuracy of distribution models</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J. E. Meulenkamp</name></json:item><json:item><name>W. Sissingh</name></json:item></author><host><volume>196</volume><pages><last>228</last><first>209</first></pages><author></author><title>Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol</title></host><title>Tertiary palaeogeography and tectonostratigraphic evolution of the northern and southern Peri‐Tethys platforms and the intermediate domains of the African‐Eurasian convergent plate boundary zone</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>K. E. Nicholson</name></json:item></author><host><volume>32</volume><pages><last>938</last><first>929</first></pages><author></author><title>J. Biogeogr</title></host><title>Mainland colonization by island lizards</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. Nieminen</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>91</last><first>63</first></pages><author></author><title>On the wings of checkerspots. A model system for population biology</title></host><title>Structure and dynamics of Melitaea cinxia metapopulations</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>P. Parenzan</name></json:item><json:item><name>F. Porcelli</name></json:item></author><host><volume>15</volume><pages><last>393</last><first>1</first></pages><author></author><title>Phytophaga</title></host><title>I Macrolepidotteri italiani. Fauna Lepidopterorum Italiae (Macrolepidoptera)</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>K. M. Robbirt</name></json:item></author><host><volume>15</volume><pages><last>1912</last><first>1903</first></pages><author></author><title>Biodivers. Conserv</title></host><title>Comparing IUCN and probabilistic assessments of threat: do IUCN red list criteria conflate rarity and threat?</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. L. Rosenzweig</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>343</last><first>325</first></pages><author></author><title>Frontiers of biogeography. New directions in the geography of nature</title></host><title>Applying species–area relationships to the conservation of species diversity</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>T. Schmitt</name></json:item></author><host><volume>4</volume><pages><first>11</first></pages><author></author><title>Front. Zool</title></host><title>Molecular biogeography of Europe: Pleistocene cycles and Postglacial trends</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Sforzi, A. and Bartolozzi, L.. 2001. Libro Rosso degli insetti della Toscana. ARSIA Regione Toscana.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. Tarrier</name></json:item></author><host><volume>17</volume><pages><last>210</last><first>197</first></pages><author></author><title>Linneana Belgica</title></host><title>Cartographie des Rhopalocères Papilionoidea du Maroc</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>C. D. Thomas</name></json:item><json:item><name>S. Harrison</name></json:item></author><host><volume>61</volume><pages><last>446</last><first>437</first></pages><author></author><title>J. Anim. Ecol</title></host><title>Spatial dynamics of a patchily distributed butterfly species</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Thornton, I. W. B.. 1996. Krakatua – the destruction and reassembly of an island ecosystem. Harvard Univ. Press.</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Tolman, T. and Lewington, R.. 1997. Butterflies of Britain and Europe. Harper Collins.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>W. Ulrich</name></json:item><json:item><name>J. Buszko</name></json:item></author><host><volume>14</volume><pages><last>1988</last><first>1977</first></pages><author></author><title>Biodivers. Conserv</title></host><title>Detecting biodiversity hotspots using species–area and endemics–area relationships: the case of butterflies</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Van Swaay, C. A. M. and Warren, M. S.. 1999. Red data book of European butterflies (Rhopalocera), Nature and environment. Council of European Publ.</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><volume>235</volume><author></author><title>Verity, R.. 19401953. Le farfalle diurne d'Italia. Vol. 1–5. Marzocco.</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Whittaker, R. J.. 1998. Island biogeography: ecology, evolution, and conservation. Oxford Univ. Press.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>R. J. Whittaker</name></json:item></author><host><volume>11</volume><pages><last>23</last><first>3</first></pages><author></author><title>Divers. Distrib</title></host><title>Conservation Biogeography: assessment and prospect</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>R. J. Whittaker</name></json:item></author><host><volume>30</volume><pages><last>327</last><first>321</first></pages><author></author><title>Ecography</title></host><title>The island immaturity – speciation pulse model of island evolution: an alternative to the “diversity begets diversity” model</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>P. Williams</name></json:item></author><host><volume>128</volume><pages><last>264</last><first>253</first></pages><author></author><title>Biol. Conserv</title></host><title>Complementarity analysis: mapping the performance of surrogates for biodiversity</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Williamson, M. H.. 1981. Island populations. Oxford Univ. Press.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>W. C. Witt</name></json:item><json:item><name>S. Maliakal‐Witt</name></json:item></author><host><volume>30</volume><pages><last>333</last><first>331</first></pages><author></author><title>Ecography</title></host><title>Why are diversity and endemism linked on islands?</title></json:item></refBibs><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><volume>32</volume><publisherId><json:string>ECOG</json:string></publisherId><pages><total>11</total><last>179</last><first>169</first></pages><issn><json:string>0906-7590</json:string></issn><issue>1</issue><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1600-0587</json:string></eissn><title>Ecography</title><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0587</json:string></doi></host><categories><wos><json:string>science</json:string><json:string>ecology</json:string><json:string>biodiversity conservation</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>natural sciences</json:string><json:string>biology</json:string><json:string>ecology</json:string></scienceMetrix></categories><publicationDate>2009</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2009</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1600-0587.2008.05600.x</json:string></doi><id>5CAB7C46FEA2FF2B164A97390D400DE6C0BD9E3A</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/5CAB7C46FEA2FF2B164A97390D400DE6C0BD9E3A/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/5CAB7C46FEA2FF2B164A97390D400DE6C0BD9E3A/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/5CAB7C46FEA2FF2B164A97390D400DE6C0BD9E3A/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Conservation biogeography of large Mediterranean islands. Butterfly impoverishment, conservation priorities and inferences for an ecologica “island paradigm”</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><p>© 2009 The Authors</p></availability><date>2009</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Conservation biogeography of large Mediterranean islands. Butterfly impoverishment, conservation priorities and inferences for an ecologica “island paradigm”</title><author xml:id="author-1"><persName><forename type="first">Leonardo</forename><surname>Dapporto</surname></persName></author><author xml:id="author-2"><persName><forename type="first">Roger L. H.</forename><surname>Dennis</surname></persName></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Ecography</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">Ecography</title><idno type="pISSN">0906-7590</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0587</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0587</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2009-02"></date><biblScope unit="volume">32</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="169">169</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="179">179</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">5CAB7C46FEA2FF2B164A97390D400DE6C0BD9E3A</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0587.2008.05600.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">ECOG5600</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2009</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Conservation biogeography is considered the Cinderella of biological conservation. Nevertheless biogeography provides the basis for establishing species distributions over space and time, therefore conservation priorities among areas and individual species. We demonstrate that there is no need to simplify analyses by using subsets of species (rare species, endemics) as surrogates. In doing so, we apply strict biogeographical techniques to determine butterfly impoverishment on three of the west Mediterranean's largest islands (Sardinia, Corsica and Sicily). The analyses performed on species, both collectively and individually, reveal that regional species richness in the Mediterranean zone can be largely predicted by latitude, altitude and latitudinal range (maximum minus minimum latitude), but that Sardinia and Corsica have clearly impoverished faunas. Logistic regression at individual species level demonstrates that several species, predicted to be present in these islands on the basis of their continental distributions, are actually absent. When compared with species that are present in these islands, such missing species are disclosed as having ecological traits which reduce their colonization capability. Probabilities of occurrence are calculated for each species on each island; they reflect the potential for each butterfly species to migrate to and colonise each island, and can be considered as a measure of conservation value. As such, species present on islands but having low immigration probabilities are predicted to represent isolated populations from the mainland that are unlikely to re‐colonize the islands in the case of extinction. Island endemic species and races are shown to have lower occurrence probabilities compared to widespread species occurring on islands and illustrate the usefulness of occurrence probabilities for identifying isolated populations in need of conservation attention.</p></abstract></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2009-02">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/5CAB7C46FEA2FF2B164A97390D400DE6C0BD9E3A/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0587</doi><issn type="print">0906-7590</issn><issn type="electronic">1600-0587</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="ECOG"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="ECOGRAPHY">Ecography</title><title type="short">Ecography</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="02001"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/eco.2009.32.issue-1</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="32">32</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="1">1</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2009-02">February 2009</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="20" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1600-0587.2008.05600.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="ECOG5600"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="11"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Research</title></titleGroup><copyright>© 2009 The Authors</copyright><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2008-11-27"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2009-04-03"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.15 mode:FullText source:FullText result:FullText" date="2010-07-21"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-19"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-16"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="169">169</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="179">179</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo> L. Dapporto (<email>leondap@gmail.com</email>), Istituto Comprensivo Materna Elementere Media Convenevole da Prato via 1° Maggio 40, IT‐59100, Prato, Italy. – R. L. H. Dennis, NERC centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Monks Wood, Abbots Ripton, Huntingdon, Cambridgeshire PE28 2LS, UK, and Inst. For Environment, Sustainability and Regeneration, Mellor Building, Staffordshire Univ., College Road, Stoke on Trent ST4 2DE, UK.</correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:ECOG.ECOG5600.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory>Manuscript Accepted 28 August 2008</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="4"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="1"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="57"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Conservation biogeography of large Mediterranean islands. Butterfly impoverishment, conservation priorities and inferences for an ecologica “island paradigm”</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1"><personName><givenNames>Leonardo</givenNames><familyName>Dapporto</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2"><personName><givenNames>Roger L. H.</givenNames><familyName>Dennis</familyName></personName></creator></creators><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p>Conservation biogeography is considered the Cinderella of biological conservation. Nevertheless biogeography provides the basis for establishing species distributions over space and time, therefore conservation priorities among areas and individual species. We demonstrate that there is no need to simplify analyses by using subsets of species (rare species, endemics) as surrogates. In doing so, we apply strict biogeographical techniques to determine butterfly impoverishment on three of the west Mediterranean's largest islands (Sardinia, Corsica and Sicily). The analyses performed on species, both collectively and individually, reveal that regional species richness in the Mediterranean zone can be largely predicted by latitude, altitude and latitudinal range (maximum minus minimum latitude), but that Sardinia and Corsica have clearly impoverished faunas. Logistic regression at individual species level demonstrates that several species, predicted to be present in these islands on the basis of their continental distributions, are actually absent. When compared with species that are present in these islands, such missing species are disclosed as having ecological traits which reduce their colonization capability. Probabilities of occurrence are calculated for each species on each island; they reflect the potential for each butterfly species to migrate to and colonise each island, and can be considered as a measure of conservation value. As such, species present on islands but having low immigration probabilities are predicted to represent isolated populations from the mainland that are unlikely to re‐colonize the islands in the case of extinction. Island endemic species and races are shown to have lower occurrence probabilities compared to widespread species occurring on islands and illustrate the usefulness of occurrence probabilities for identifying isolated populations in need of conservation attention.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Conservation biogeography of large Mediterranean islands. Butterfly impoverishment, conservation priorities and inferences for an ecologica “island paradigm”</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Conservation biogeography of large Mediterranean islands. Butterfly impoverishment, conservation priorities and inferences for an ecologica “island paradigm”</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Leonardo</namePart><namePart type="family">Dapporto</namePart><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Roger L. H.</namePart><namePart type="family">Dennis</namePart><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2009-02</dateIssued><edition>Manuscript Accepted 28 August 2008</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2009</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType><extent unit="figures">4</extent><extent unit="tables">1</extent><extent unit="references">57</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">Conservation biogeography is considered the Cinderella of biological conservation. Nevertheless biogeography provides the basis for establishing species distributions over space and time, therefore conservation priorities among areas and individual species. We demonstrate that there is no need to simplify analyses by using subsets of species (rare species, endemics) as surrogates. In doing so, we apply strict biogeographical techniques to determine butterfly impoverishment on three of the west Mediterranean's largest islands (Sardinia, Corsica and Sicily). The analyses performed on species, both collectively and individually, reveal that regional species richness in the Mediterranean zone can be largely predicted by latitude, altitude and latitudinal range (maximum minus minimum latitude), but that Sardinia and Corsica have clearly impoverished faunas. Logistic regression at individual species level demonstrates that several species, predicted to be present in these islands on the basis of their continental distributions, are actually absent. When compared with species that are present in these islands, such missing species are disclosed as having ecological traits which reduce their colonization capability. Probabilities of occurrence are calculated for each species on each island; they reflect the potential for each butterfly species to migrate to and colonise each island, and can be considered as a measure of conservation value. As such, species present on islands but having low immigration probabilities are predicted to represent isolated populations from the mainland that are unlikely to re‐colonize the islands in the case of extinction. Island endemic species and races are shown to have lower occurrence probabilities compared to widespread species occurring on islands and illustrate the usefulness of occurrence probabilities for identifying isolated populations in need of conservation attention.</abstract><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Ecography</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>Ecography</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0906-7590</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1600-0587</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0587</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">ECOG</identifier><part><date>2009</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>32</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>1</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>169</start><end>179</end><total>11</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">5CAB7C46FEA2FF2B164A97390D400DE6C0BD9E3A</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0587.2008.05600.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">ECOG5600</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2009 The Authors</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource>WILEY</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Bois/explor/CheneBelgiqueV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001484 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001484 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Bois
|area= CheneBelgiqueV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:5CAB7C46FEA2FF2B164A97390D400DE6C0BD9E3A
|texte= Conservation biogeography of large Mediterranean islands. Butterfly impoverishment, conservation priorities and inferences for an ecologica “island paradigm”
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.27. |  |