Variability of forest edge effect on vegetation implies reconsideration of its assumed hypothetical pattern
Identifieur interne : 000A19 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000A18; suivant : 000A20Variability of forest edge effect on vegetation implies reconsideration of its assumed hypothetical pattern
Auteurs : Audrey Alignier ; Marc DeconchatSource :
- Applied Vegetation Science [ 1402-2001 ] ; 2011-02.
English descriptors
Abstract
Question: How do descriptors of forest vegetation (species richness and composition) respond to edge influence and do these response patterns fit to the two‐zone pattern theoretically predicted and empirically observed?
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1654-109X.2010.01105.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:9C9AC821E565C1B77638A3B76C2F6CEC806E5F9FLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Variability of forest edge effect on vegetation implies reconsideration of its assumed hypothetical pattern</title><author><name sortKey="Alignier, Audrey" sort="Alignier, Audrey" uniqKey="Alignier A" first="Audrey" last="Alignier">Audrey Alignier</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>INRA, UMR 1201 DYNAFOR, F–31320 Castanet‐Tolosan, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Deconchat, Marc" sort="Deconchat, Marc" uniqKey="Deconchat M" first="Marc" last="Deconchat">Marc Deconchat</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>INRA, UMR 1201 DYNAFOR, F–31320 Castanet‐Tolosan, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:9C9AC821E565C1B77638A3B76C2F6CEC806E5F9F</idno><date when="2011" year="2011">2011</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1654-109X.2010.01105.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/9C9AC821E565C1B77638A3B76C2F6CEC806E5F9F/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000A19</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000A19</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Variability of forest edge effect on vegetation implies reconsideration of its assumed hypothetical pattern</title><author><name sortKey="Alignier, Audrey" sort="Alignier, Audrey" uniqKey="Alignier A" first="Audrey" last="Alignier">Audrey Alignier</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>INRA, UMR 1201 DYNAFOR, F–31320 Castanet‐Tolosan, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Deconchat, Marc" sort="Deconchat, Marc" uniqKey="Deconchat M" first="Marc" last="Deconchat">Marc Deconchat</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>INRA, UMR 1201 DYNAFOR, F–31320 Castanet‐Tolosan, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Applied Vegetation Science</title><idno type="ISSN">1402-2001</idno><idno type="eISSN">1654-109X</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2011-02">2011-02</date><biblScope unit="volume">14</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="67">67</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="74">74</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1402-2001</idno></series><idno type="istex">9C9AC821E565C1B77638A3B76C2F6CEC806E5F9F</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1654-109X.2010.01105.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">AVSC1105</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1402-2001</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Boundary type</term><term>Composition</term><term>Edge influence</term><term>Response pattern</term><term>Species richness</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Question: How do descriptors of forest vegetation (species richness and composition) respond to edge influence and do these response patterns fit to the two‐zone pattern theoretically predicted and empirically observed?</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Audrey Alignier</name><affiliations><json:string>INRA, UMR 1201 DYNAFOR, F–31320 Castanet‐Tolosan, France</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Marc Deconchat</name><affiliations><json:string>INRA, UMR 1201 DYNAFOR, F–31320 Castanet‐Tolosan, France</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Boundary type</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Composition</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Edge influence</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Response pattern</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Species richness</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>AVSC1105</json:string></articleId><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><qualityIndicators><score>5.36</score><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 782.362 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractCharCount>219</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>5052</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>32388</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>8</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>30</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Variability of forest edge effect on vegetation implies reconsideration of its assumed hypothetical pattern</title><refBibs><json:item><author><json:item><name>E. Andrieu</name></json:item><json:item><name>G. Du Bus de Warnaffe</name></json:item><json:item><name>S. Ladet</name></json:item><json:item><name>W. Heintz</name></json:item><json:item><name>A. Sourdril</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Deconchat</name></json:item></author><host><volume>5</volume><pages><last>676</last><first>667</first></pages><author></author><title>Revue Forestière Française</title></host><title>Cartographier l'historique des coupes forestières dans les petits bois</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. Bernhardt‐Römermann</name></json:item><json:item><name>C. Römermann</name></json:item><json:item><name>R. Nuske</name></json:item><json:item><name>A. Parth</name></json:item><json:item><name>S. Klotz</name></json:item><json:item><name>W. Schmidt</name></json:item><json:item><name>J. Stadler</name></json:item></author><host><volume>117</volume><pages><last>1541</last><first>1533</first></pages><author></author><title>Oikos</title></host><title>On the identification of the most suitable traits for plant functional trait analyses</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>T.S. Brothers</name></json:item><json:item><name>A. Spingarn</name></json:item></author><host><volume>6</volume><pages><last>100</last><first>91</first></pages><author></author><title>Conservation Biology</title></host><title>Forest fragmentation and alien plant invasion of Central Indiana old‐growth forests</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J. Brunet</name></json:item><json:item><name>G. von Oheimb</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Diekmann</name></json:item></author><host><volume>11</volume><pages><last>524</last><first>515</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Vegetation Science</title></host><title>Factors influencing vegetation gradients across ancient‐recent woodland borderlines in southern Sweden</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M.L. Cadenasso</name></json:item><json:item><name>S.T.A. Pickett</name></json:item><json:item><name>K.C. Weathers</name></json:item><json:item><name>S.S. Bell</name></json:item><json:item><name>T.L. Benning</name></json:item><json:item><name>M.M. Carreiro</name></json:item><json:item><name>T.E. Dawson</name></json:item></author><host><volume>53</volume><pages><last>722</last><first>717</first></pages><author></author><title>Bioscience</title></host><title>An interdisciplinary and synthetic approach to ecological boundaries</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J.Q. Chen</name></json:item><json:item><name>J.F. Franklin</name></json:item><json:item><name>T.A. Spies</name></json:item></author><host><volume>63</volume><pages><last>237</last><first>219</first></pages><author></author><title>Agricultural and Forest Meteorology</title></host><title>Contrasting microclimates among clear‐cut, edge, and interior of old‐growth douglas‐fir forest</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J. Dauber</name></json:item><json:item><name>V. Wolters</name></json:item></author><host><volume>13</volume><pages><last>915</last><first>901</first></pages><author></author><title>Biodiversity and Conservation</title></host><title>Edge effects on ant community structure and species richness in an agricultural landscape</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>S. de Blois</name></json:item><json:item><name>G. Domon</name></json:item><json:item><name>A. Bouchard</name></json:item></author><host><volume>25</volume><pages><last>256</last><first>244</first></pages><author></author><title>Ecography</title></host><title>Landscape issues in plant ecology</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>G. Du Bus de Warnaffe</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Deconchat</name></json:item><json:item><name>S. Ladet</name></json:item><json:item><name>G. Balent</name></json:item></author><host><volume>63</volume><pages><last>927</last><first>915</first></pages><author></author><title>Annals of Forest Science</title></host><title>Variability of cutting regimes in small private woodlots of south‐western France</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J.B. Dunning</name></json:item><json:item><name>B.J. Danielson</name></json:item><json:item><name>H.R. Pulliam</name></json:item></author><host><volume>65</volume><pages><last>175</last><first>169</first></pages><author></author><title>Oikos</title></host><title>Ecological processes that affect populations in complex landscapes</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>C. Fernández</name></json:item><json:item><name>F.J. Acosta</name></json:item><json:item><name>G. Abellá</name></json:item><json:item><name>F. López</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Díaz</name></json:item></author><host><volume>149</volume><pages><last>283</last><first>273</first></pages><author></author><title>Ecological Modelling</title></host><title>Complex edge effect fields as additive processes in patches of ecological systems</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Forman, R.T.T. & Godron, M. 1986. Landscape ecology. John Wiley & sons, New York, NY, US.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>B.J. Fox</name></json:item><json:item><name>J.E. Taylor</name></json:item><json:item><name>M.D. Fox</name></json:item><json:item><name>C. Williams</name></json:item></author><host><volume>82</volume><pages><last>13</last><first>1</first></pages><author></author><title>Biological Conservation</title></host><title>Vegetation changes across edges of rainforest remnants</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>S. Fraver</name></json:item></author><host><volume>8</volume><pages><last>832</last><first>822</first></pages><author></author><title>Conservation Biology</title></host><title>Vegetation responses along edge‐to‐interior gradients in the mixed hardwood forests of the Roanoke river basin, North‐Carolina</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>S.M. Gehlhausen</name></json:item><json:item><name>M.W. Schwartz</name></json:item><json:item><name>C.K. Augspurger</name></json:item></author><host><volume>147</volume><pages><last>35</last><first>21</first></pages><author></author><title>Plant Ecology</title></host><title>Vegetation and microclimatic edge effects in two mixed‐mesophytic forest fragments</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. Gonzalez</name></json:item><json:item><name>S. Ladet</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Deconchat</name></json:item><json:item><name>A. Cabanettes</name></json:item><json:item><name>D. Alard</name></json:item><json:item><name>G. Balent</name></json:item></author><host><volume>259</volume><pages><last>274</last><first>266</first></pages><author></author><title>Forest Ecology and Management</title></host><title>Relative contribution of edge and interior zone to patch size effect on species richness</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. Gosselin</name></json:item></author><host><volume>183</volume><pages><last>62</last><first>58</first></pages><author></author><title>Forêt-Entreprise</title></host><title>Biodiversité et gestion forestière</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>L. Hamberg</name></json:item><json:item><name>S. Lehvävirta</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Malvivaara‐Lämsä</name></json:item><json:item><name>H. Rita</name></json:item><json:item><name>D.J. Kotze</name></json:item></author><host><volume>11</volume><pages><last>98</last><first>83</first></pages><author></author><title>Applied Vegetation Science</title></host><title>The effects of habitat edges and trampling on understorey vegetation in urban forests in Helsinki, Finland</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>K.A. Harper</name></json:item><json:item><name>S.E. Macdonald</name></json:item></author><host><volume>13</volume><pages><last>546</last><first>535</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Vegetation Science</title></host><title>Structure and composition of edges next to regenerating clear‐cuts in mixed‐wood boreal forest</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>K.A. Harper</name></json:item><json:item><name>L. Mascarua‐Lopez</name></json:item><json:item><name>S.E. Macdonald</name></json:item><json:item><name>P. Drapeau</name></json:item></author><host><volume>192</volume><pages><last>84</last><first>71</first></pages><author></author><title>Plant Ecology</title></host><title>Interaction of edge influence from multiple edges</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>B. Hérault</name></json:item><json:item><name>O. Honnay</name></json:item></author><host><volume>32</volume><pages><last>2081</last><first>2069</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Biogeography</title></host><title>The relative importance of local, regional and historical factors determining the distribution of plants in fragmented riverine forests</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. Hermy</name></json:item><json:item><name>O. Honnay</name></json:item><json:item><name>L. Firbank</name></json:item><json:item><name>C. Grashof‐Bokdam</name></json:item><json:item><name>J.E. Lawesson</name></json:item></author><host><volume>91</volume><pages><last>22</last><first>9</first></pages><author></author><title>Biological Conservervation</title></host><title>An ecological comparison between ancient and other forest plant species of Europe, and the implications for forest conservation</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>O. Honnay</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Hermy</name></json:item><json:item><name>P. Coppin</name></json:item></author><host><volume>87</volume><pages><last>84</last><first>73</first></pages><author></author><title>Biological Conservation</title></host><title>Effects of area, age and diversity of forest patches in Belgium on plant species richness, and implications for conservation and reforestation</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>O. Honnay</name></json:item><json:item><name>K. Verheyen</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Hermy</name></json:item></author><host><volume>161</volume><pages><last>122</last><first>109</first></pages><author></author><title>Forest Ecology and Management</title></host><title>Permeability of ancient forest edges for weedy plant species invasion</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>H. Jacquemyn</name></json:item><json:item><name>J. Butaye</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Dumortier</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Hermy</name></json:item><json:item><name>N. Lust</name></json:item></author><host><volume>12</volume><pages><last>642</last><first>635</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Vegetation Science</title></host><title>Effects of age and distance on the composition of mixed deciduous forest fragments in an agricultural landscape</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. Kuussaari</name></json:item><json:item><name>R. Bommarco</name></json:item><json:item><name>R.K. Heikkinen</name></json:item><json:item><name>A. Helm</name></json:item><json:item><name>J. Krauss</name></json:item><json:item><name>R. Lindborg</name></json:item><json:item><name>E. Öckinger</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Pärtel</name></json:item><json:item><name>J. Pino</name></json:item><json:item><name>F. Rodà</name></json:item><json:item><name>C. Stefanescu</name></json:item><json:item><name>T. Teder</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Zobel</name></json:item><json:item><name>I. Steffan‐Dewenter</name></json:item></author><host><volume>24</volume><pages><last>571</last><first>564</first></pages><author></author><title>Trends in Ecology & Evolution</title></host><title>Extinction debt</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>L.G. Li</name></json:item><json:item><name>X.Y. He</name></json:item><json:item><name>X.Z. Li</name></json:item><json:item><name>Q.C. Wen</name></json:item><json:item><name>Y.H. Zhao</name></json:item></author><host><volume>16</volume><pages><last>108</last><first>105</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Forestry Research</title></host><title>Comparison of two approaches for detecting the depth of edge influence on vegetation diversity in the arid valley of southwestern China</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>L. Lin</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Cao</name></json:item></author><host><volume>257</volume><pages><last>1352</last><first>1344</first></pages><author></author><title>Forest Ecology and Management</title></host><title>Edge effects on soil seed banks and understory vegetation in subtropical and tropical forests in Yunnan, southwestern China</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>P. Marchand</name></json:item><json:item><name>G. Houle</name></json:item></author><host><volume>223</volume><pages><last>124</last><first>113</first></pages><author></author><title>Forest Ecology and Management</title></host><title>Spatial patterns of plant species richness along a forest edge</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>G.R. Matlack</name></json:item></author><host><volume>66</volume><pages><last>194</last><first>185</first></pages><author></author><title>Biological Conservation</title></host><title>Microenvironment variation within and among forest edge sites in the eastern United States</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>G.R. Matlack</name></json:item></author><host><volume>82</volume><pages><last>123</last><first>113</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Ecology</title></host><title>Vegetation dynamics of the forest edge – trends in space and successional time</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>D. McCollin</name></json:item><json:item><name>J.I. Jackson</name></json:item><json:item><name>R.G.H. Bunce</name></json:item><json:item><name>C.J. Barr</name></json:item><json:item><name>R. Stuart</name></json:item></author><host><volume>60</volume><pages><last>90</last><first>77</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Environmental Management</title></host><title>Hedgerows as habitat for woodland plants</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>McCune, B. & Grace, J.B. 2002. Analysis of ecological communities. MJM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, OR, US.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>S. McIntyre</name></json:item><json:item><name>S. Lavorel</name></json:item><json:item><name>R.M. Tremont</name></json:item></author><host><volume>83</volume><pages><last>44</last><first>31</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Ecology</title></host><title>Plant life‐history attributes</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>S.J. Meiners</name></json:item><json:item><name>S.T.A. Pickett</name></json:item></author><host><volume>22</volume><pages><last>267</last><first>261</first></pages><author></author><title>Ecography</title></host><title>Changes in community and population responses across a forest‐field gradient</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>C. Murcia</name></json:item></author><host><volume>10</volume><pages><last>62</last><first>58</first></pages><author></author><title>Trends in Ecology & Evolution</title></host><title>Edge effects in fragmented forests</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>D.M. Nickerson</name></json:item><json:item><name>D.E. Facey</name></json:item><json:item><name>G.D. Grossman</name></json:item></author><host><volume>62</volume><pages><last>887</last><first>866</first></pages><author></author><title>Physiological Zoology</title></host><title>Estimating physiological thresholds with continuous two‐phase regression</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>B.J. Palik</name></json:item><json:item><name>P.G. Murphy</name></json:item></author><host><volume>32</volume><pages><last>202</last><first>187</first></pages><author></author><title>Forest Ecology and Management</title></host><title>Disturbance versus edge effects in sugar‐maple/beech forest fragments</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>K. Piessens</name></json:item><json:item><name>O. Honnay</name></json:item><json:item><name>R. Devlaeminck</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Hermy</name></json:item></author><host><volume>114</volume><pages><last>342</last><first>335</first></pages><author></author><title>Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment</title></host><title>Biotic and abiotic edge effects in highly fragmented heathlands adjacent to cropland and forest</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J.W. Ranney</name></json:item><json:item><name>M.C. Bruner</name></json:item><json:item><name>J.B. Levenson</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>95</last><first>67</first></pages><author></author><title>Forest island dynamics in man‐dominated landscapes</title></host><title>The importance of edge in the structure and dynamics of forest islands</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>L. Ries</name></json:item><json:item><name>R.J. Fletcher</name></json:item><json:item><name>J. Battin</name></json:item><json:item><name>T.D. Sisk</name></json:item></author><host><volume>35</volume><pages><last>522</last><first>491</first></pages><author></author><title>Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics</title></host><title>Ecological responses to habitat edges</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J.P. Sarthou</name></json:item><json:item><name>A. Ouin</name></json:item><json:item><name>F. Arrignon</name></json:item><json:item><name>G. Barreau</name></json:item><json:item><name>B. Bouyjou</name></json:item></author><host><volume>102</volume><pages><last>545</last><first>539</first></pages><author></author><title>European Journal of Entomology</title></host><title>Landscape parameters explain the distribution and abundance of Episyrphus balteatus (Diptera: Syrphidae)</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>B. Snoeck</name></json:item><json:item><name>F. Baar</name></json:item></author><host><volume>53</volume><pages><last>15</last><first>2</first></pages><author></author><title>Cahier Technique n°16 Forêt Wallonne</title></host><title>Aménager les lisières forestières</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>D.L. Strayer</name></json:item><json:item><name>M.E. Power</name></json:item><json:item><name>W.F. Fagan</name></json:item><json:item><name>S.T.A. Pickett</name></json:item><json:item><name>J. Belnap</name></json:item></author><host><volume>53</volume><pages><last>729</last><first>723</first></pages><author></author><title>Bioscience</title></host><title>A classification of ecological boundaries</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J.D. Toms</name></json:item><json:item><name>M.L. Lesperance</name></json:item></author><host><volume>84</volume><pages><last>2041</last><first>2034</first></pages><author></author><title>Ecology</title></host><title>Piecewise regression</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Tutin, T.G., Burges, N.A., Chater, A.O., Edmondson, J.R., Heywood, V.H., Moore, D.M., Valentine, D.H., Walters, S.M. & Webb, D.A. 1993. Flora Europaea. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. Vellend</name></json:item><json:item><name>K. Verheyen</name></json:item><json:item><name>H. Jacquemyn</name></json:item><json:item><name>A. Kolb</name></json:item><json:item><name>H. Van Calster</name></json:item><json:item><name>G. Peterken</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Hermy</name></json:item></author><host><volume>87</volume><pages><last>548</last><first>542</first></pages><author></author><title>Ecology</title></host><title>Extinction debt for forest plants persists for more than a century following habitat fragmentation</title></json:item></refBibs><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><volume>14</volume><publisherId><json:string>AVSC</json:string></publisherId><pages><total>8</total><last>74</last><first>67</first></pages><issn><json:string>1402-2001</json:string></issn><issue>1</issue><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1654-109X</json:string></eissn><title>Applied Vegetation Science</title><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1654-109X</json:string></doi></host><categories><wos><json:string>science</json:string><json:string>plant sciences</json:string><json:string>forestry</json:string><json:string>ecology</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>natural sciences</json:string><json:string>biology</json:string><json:string>ecology</json:string></scienceMetrix></categories><publicationDate>2011</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2011</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1654-109X.2010.01105.x</json:string></doi><id>9C9AC821E565C1B77638A3B76C2F6CEC806E5F9F</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/9C9AC821E565C1B77638A3B76C2F6CEC806E5F9F/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/9C9AC821E565C1B77638A3B76C2F6CEC806E5F9F/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/9C9AC821E565C1B77638A3B76C2F6CEC806E5F9F/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Variability of forest edge effect on vegetation implies reconsideration of its assumed hypothetical pattern</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><p>© 2010 International Association for Vegetation Science</p></availability><date>2011</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Variability of forest edge effect on vegetation implies reconsideration of its assumed hypothetical pattern</title><author xml:id="author-1"><persName><forename type="first">Audrey</forename><surname>Alignier</surname></persName><affiliation>INRA, UMR 1201 DYNAFOR, F–31320 Castanet‐Tolosan, France</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-2"><persName><forename type="first">Marc</forename><surname>Deconchat</surname></persName><affiliation>INRA, UMR 1201 DYNAFOR, F–31320 Castanet‐Tolosan, France</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Applied Vegetation Science</title><idno type="pISSN">1402-2001</idno><idno type="eISSN">1654-109X</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1654-109X</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2011-02"></date><biblScope unit="volume">14</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="67">67</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="74">74</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">9C9AC821E565C1B77638A3B76C2F6CEC806E5F9F</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1654-109X.2010.01105.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">AVSC1105</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2011</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract><p>Question: How do descriptors of forest vegetation (species richness and composition) respond to edge influence and do these response patterns fit to the two‐zone pattern theoretically predicted and empirically observed?</p></abstract><abstract><p>Location: District of Aurignac, southwestern France.</p></abstract><abstract><p>Methods: We surveyed all understory forest vegetation along 28 transects pertaining to seven contrasted boundary types. Boundary types were a combination of adjacent land cover, orientation and topography classes. Response patterns to edge influence of two vegetation descriptors, species richness and composition (summarized by an ordination), were analysed using the two‐phase linear regression method . Data for each transect were divided into all possible pairs of adjacent groups of successive plots, and a linear regression was computed on both groups of plots. Regression parameters were interpreted by comparison with the two‐zone theoretical pattern and related to boundary types.</p></abstract><abstract><p>Results: We have shown for nearly half of the transects that vegetation responses deviate from the two‐zone pattern. There was no significant relationship between regression coefficients for richness and boundary characteristics whereas regression coefficients for composition were partly related to adjacent land cover.</p></abstract><abstract><p>Conclusions: Our results demonstrate a high variability of forest vegetation response patterns to edge that contrasts with the theoretical pattern usually reported in the literature. Forest history and edge dynamics are invoked to explain the observed vegetation patterns. We have shown the need for a review of factors affecting the edge influence for better management and conservation of forest plant species.</p></abstract><textClass xml:lang="en"><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>keywords</head><item><term>Boundary type</term></item><item><term>Composition</term></item><item><term>Edge influence</term></item><item><term>Response pattern</term></item><item><term>Species richness</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2011-02">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/9C9AC821E565C1B77638A3B76C2F6CEC806E5F9F/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1654-109X</doi><issn type="print">1402-2001</issn><issn type="electronic">1654-109X</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="AVSC"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="APPLIED VEGETATION SCIENCE">Applied Vegetation Science</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="02101"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/avsc.2011.14.issue-1</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="14">14</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="1">1</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2011-02">February 2011</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="7" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1654-109X.2010.01105.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="AVSC1105"></id><id type="supplier" value="1105"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="8"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><copyright>© 2010 International Association for Vegetation Science</copyright><eventGroup><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.4.2 mode:FullText" date="2011-01-14"></event><event type="publishedOnlineEarlyUnpaginated" date="2010-08-30"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2010-08-30"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2011-01-14"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-15"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-15"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="67">67</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="74">74</numbering></numberingGroup><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:AVSC.AVSC1105.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory>Received 15 January 2010Accepted 20 July 2010</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="2"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="1"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="47"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="6216"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="58"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Variability of forest edge effect on vegetation implies reconsideration of its assumed hypothetical pattern</title><title type="shortAuthors">A. Alignier & M. Deconchat</title><title type="short">Variability of forest edge effect on vegetation</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Audrey</givenNames><familyName>Alignier</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Marc</givenNames><familyName>Deconchat</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="FR"><unparsedAffiliation>INRA, UMR 1201 DYNAFOR, F–31320 Castanet‐Tolosan, France</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">Boundary type</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">Composition</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">Edge influence</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">Response pattern</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">Species richness</keyword></keywordGroup><supportingInformation><p><b>Appendix S1.</b> Values of minimal error sum of squares (SSE) and regression coefficients from two‐phase linear regression method, for species richness and composition per transect. The letters of the boundary type codes indicate adjacent land cover (C=crop, M=meadow), orientation (N=north, S=south) and topography (I=in slope and U=up slope). <sup>*</sup> , Significant regression (<i>P</i><0.05) ; ns , no significant regression.</p><p>Please note: Wiley‐Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting materials supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than about missing material) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.</p><supportingInfoItem><mediaResource alt="supporting info item" href="urn-x:wiley:14022001:media:avsc1105:AVSC_1105_sm_appendix-s1"></mediaResource><caption>Supporting info item</caption></supportingInfoItem></supportingInformation><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">Abstract</title><p><b>Question: </b> How do descriptors of forest vegetation (species richness and composition) respond to edge influence and do these response patterns fit to the two‐zone pattern theoretically predicted and empirically observed?</p><p><b>Location: </b> District of Aurignac, southwestern France.</p><p><b>Methods: </b> We surveyed all understory forest vegetation along 28 transects pertaining to seven contrasted boundary types. Boundary types were a combination of adjacent land cover, orientation and topography classes. Response patterns to edge influence of two vegetation descriptors, species richness and composition (summarized by an ordination), were analysed using the two‐phase linear regression method . Data for each transect were divided into all possible pairs of adjacent groups of successive plots, and a linear regression was computed on both groups of plots. Regression parameters were interpreted by comparison with the two‐zone theoretical pattern and related to boundary types.</p><p><b>Results: </b> We have shown for nearly half of the transects that vegetation responses deviate from the two‐zone pattern. There was no significant relationship between regression coefficients for richness and boundary characteristics whereas regression coefficients for composition were partly related to adjacent land cover.</p><p><b>Conclusions: </b> Our results demonstrate a high variability of forest vegetation response patterns to edge that contrasts with the theoretical pattern usually reported in the literature. Forest history and edge dynamics are invoked to explain the observed vegetation patterns. We have shown the need for a review of factors affecting the edge influence for better management and conservation of forest plant species.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta><noteGroup><note xml:id="fn1"><p><b>Alignier, A.</b> (corresponding author, <email normalForm="audrey.alignier@toulouse.inra.fr">audrey.alignier@toulouse.inra.fr</email>) & <b>Deconchat, M.</b> (<email normalForm="marc.deconchat@toulouse.inra.fr">marc.deconchat@toulouse.inra.fr</email>): INRA, UMR 1201 DYNAFOR, F–31320 Castanet‐Tolosan, France</p></note><note xml:id="fn2"><p>Co‐ordinating Editor: Sándor Bartha</p></note></noteGroup></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Variability of forest edge effect on vegetation implies reconsideration of its assumed hypothetical pattern</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Variability of forest edge effect on vegetation</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Variability of forest edge effect on vegetation implies reconsideration of its assumed hypothetical pattern</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Audrey</namePart><namePart type="family">Alignier</namePart><affiliation>INRA, UMR 1201 DYNAFOR, F–31320 Castanet‐Tolosan, France</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Marc</namePart><namePart type="family">Deconchat</namePart><affiliation>INRA, UMR 1201 DYNAFOR, F–31320 Castanet‐Tolosan, France</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2011-02</dateIssued><edition>Received 15 January 2010Accepted 20 July 2010</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType><extent unit="figures">2</extent><extent unit="tables">1</extent><extent unit="references">47</extent><extent unit="words">6216</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Question: How do descriptors of forest vegetation (species richness and composition) respond to edge influence and do these response patterns fit to the two‐zone pattern theoretically predicted and empirically observed?</abstract><abstract>Location: District of Aurignac, southwestern France.</abstract><abstract>Methods: We surveyed all understory forest vegetation along 28 transects pertaining to seven contrasted boundary types. Boundary types were a combination of adjacent land cover, orientation and topography classes. Response patterns to edge influence of two vegetation descriptors, species richness and composition (summarized by an ordination), were analysed using the two‐phase linear regression method . Data for each transect were divided into all possible pairs of adjacent groups of successive plots, and a linear regression was computed on both groups of plots. Regression parameters were interpreted by comparison with the two‐zone theoretical pattern and related to boundary types.</abstract><abstract>Results: We have shown for nearly half of the transects that vegetation responses deviate from the two‐zone pattern. There was no significant relationship between regression coefficients for richness and boundary characteristics whereas regression coefficients for composition were partly related to adjacent land cover.</abstract><abstract>Conclusions: Our results demonstrate a high variability of forest vegetation response patterns to edge that contrasts with the theoretical pattern usually reported in the literature. Forest history and edge dynamics are invoked to explain the observed vegetation patterns. We have shown the need for a review of factors affecting the edge influence for better management and conservation of forest plant species.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>Boundary type</topic><topic>Composition</topic><topic>Edge influence</topic><topic>Response pattern</topic><topic>Species richness</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Applied Vegetation Science</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><note type="content"> Appendix S1. Values of minimal error sum of squares (SSE) and regression coefficients from two‐phase linear regression method, for species richness and composition per transect. The letters of the boundary type codes indicate adjacent land cover (C=crop, M=meadow), orientation (N=north, S=south) and topography (I=in slope and U=up slope). * , Significant regression (P<0.05) ; ns , no significant regression. Please note: Wiley‐Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting materials supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than about missing material) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article. Appendix S1. Values of minimal error sum of squares (SSE) and regression coefficients from two‐phase linear regression method, for species richness and composition per transect. The letters of the boundary type codes indicate adjacent land cover (C=crop, M=meadow), orientation (N=north, S=south) and topography (I=in slope and U=up slope). * , Significant regression (P<0.05) ; ns , no significant regression. Please note: Wiley‐Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting materials supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than about missing material) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.Supporting Info Item: Supporting info item - </note><identifier type="ISSN">1402-2001</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1654-109X</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1654-109X</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">AVSC</identifier><part><date>2011</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>14</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>1</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>67</start><end>74</end><total>8</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">9C9AC821E565C1B77638A3B76C2F6CEC806E5F9F</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1654-109X.2010.01105.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">AVSC1105</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2010 International Association for Vegetation Science</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource>WILEY</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Bois/explor/CheneBelgiqueV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000A19 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000A19 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Bois
|area= CheneBelgiqueV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:9C9AC821E565C1B77638A3B76C2F6CEC806E5F9F
|texte= Variability of forest edge effect on vegetation implies reconsideration of its assumed hypothetical pattern
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.27. |  |