Differences in perceptual latency estimated from judgments of temporal order, simultaneity and duration are inconsistent.
Identifieur interne : 003255 ( PubMed/Curation ); précédent : 003254; suivant : 003256Differences in perceptual latency estimated from judgments of temporal order, simultaneity and duration are inconsistent.
Auteurs : Daniel Linares [Oman] ; Alex O. Holcombe [Australie]Source :
- i-Perception [ 2041-6695 ] ; 2014.
Abstract
Differences in perceptual latency (ΔL) for two stimuli, such as an auditory and a visual stimulus, can be estimated from temporal order judgments (TOJ) and simultaneity judgments (SJ), but previous research has found evidence that ΔL estimated from these tasks do not coincide. Here, using an auditory and a visual stimulus we confirmed this and further show that ΔL as estimated from duration judgments also does not coincide with ΔL estimated from TOJ or SJ. These inconsistencies suggest that each judgment is subject to different processes that bias ΔL in different ways: TOJ might be affected by sensory interactions, a bias associated with the method of single stimuli and an order difficulty bias; SJ by sensory interactions and an asymmetrical criterion bias; duration judgments by an order duration bias.
DOI: 10.1068/i0675
PubMed: 26034565
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream PubMed, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :003366
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:26034565Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Differences in perceptual latency estimated from judgments of temporal order, simultaneity and duration are inconsistent.</title><author><name sortKey="Linares, Daniel" sort="Linares, Daniel" uniqKey="Linares D" first="Daniel" last="Linares">Daniel Linares</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Laboratoire Psychologie de la Perception, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France; e-mail: danilinares@gmail.com.</nlm:affiliation><country wicri:rule="url">Oman</country><wicri:regionArea>Laboratoire Psychologie de la Perception, Université Paris Descartes, Paris</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Holcombe, Alex O" sort="Holcombe, Alex O" uniqKey="Holcombe A" first="Alex O" last="Holcombe">Alex O. Holcombe</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; e-mail: alex.holcombe@sydney.edu.au.</nlm:affiliation><country wicri:rule="url">Australie</country><wicri:regionArea>School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2014">2014</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:26034565</idno><idno type="pmid">26034565</idno><idno type="doi">10.1068/i0675</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">003366</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">003366</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">003255</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">003255</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Differences in perceptual latency estimated from judgments of temporal order, simultaneity and duration are inconsistent.</title><author><name sortKey="Linares, Daniel" sort="Linares, Daniel" uniqKey="Linares D" first="Daniel" last="Linares">Daniel Linares</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Laboratoire Psychologie de la Perception, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France; e-mail: danilinares@gmail.com.</nlm:affiliation><country wicri:rule="url">Oman</country><wicri:regionArea>Laboratoire Psychologie de la Perception, Université Paris Descartes, Paris</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Holcombe, Alex O" sort="Holcombe, Alex O" uniqKey="Holcombe A" first="Alex O" last="Holcombe">Alex O. Holcombe</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; e-mail: alex.holcombe@sydney.edu.au.</nlm:affiliation><country wicri:rule="url">Australie</country><wicri:regionArea>School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">i-Perception</title><idno type="ISSN">2041-6695</idno><imprint><date when="2014" type="published">2014</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Differences in perceptual latency (ΔL) for two stimuli, such as an auditory and a visual stimulus, can be estimated from temporal order judgments (TOJ) and simultaneity judgments (SJ), but previous research has found evidence that ΔL estimated from these tasks do not coincide. Here, using an auditory and a visual stimulus we confirmed this and further show that ΔL as estimated from duration judgments also does not coincide with ΔL estimated from TOJ or SJ. These inconsistencies suggest that each judgment is subject to different processes that bias ΔL in different ways: TOJ might be affected by sensory interactions, a bias associated with the method of single stimuli and an order difficulty bias; SJ by sensory interactions and an asymmetrical criterion bias; duration judgments by an order duration bias.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="PubMed-not-MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">26034565</PMID><DateCreated><Year>2015</Year><Month>06</Month><Day>02</Day></DateCreated><DateCompleted><Year>2015</Year><Month>06</Month><Day>02</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2017</Year><Month>02</Month><Day>20</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Electronic-eCollection"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">2041-6695</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>5</Volume><Issue>6</Issue><PubDate><Year>2014</Year></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>i-Perception</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Iperception</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Differences in perceptual latency estimated from judgments of temporal order, simultaneity and duration are inconsistent.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>559-71</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1068/i0675</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>Differences in perceptual latency (ΔL) for two stimuli, such as an auditory and a visual stimulus, can be estimated from temporal order judgments (TOJ) and simultaneity judgments (SJ), but previous research has found evidence that ΔL estimated from these tasks do not coincide. Here, using an auditory and a visual stimulus we confirmed this and further show that ΔL as estimated from duration judgments also does not coincide with ΔL estimated from TOJ or SJ. These inconsistencies suggest that each judgment is subject to different processes that bias ΔL in different ways: TOJ might be affected by sensory interactions, a bias associated with the method of single stimuli and an order difficulty bias; SJ by sensory interactions and an asymmetrical criterion bias; duration judgments by an order duration bias.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Linares</LastName><ForeName>Daniel</ForeName><Initials>D</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Laboratoire Psychologie de la Perception, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France; e-mail: danilinares@gmail.com.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Holcombe</LastName><ForeName>Alex O</ForeName><Initials>AO</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; e-mail: alex.holcombe@sydney.edu.au.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2014</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>11</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>Iperception</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>101574031</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>2041-6695</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CommentsCorrectionsList><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Vis. 2006 Mar 16;6(3):260-8</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16643094</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Cognition. 2008 May;107(2):552-80</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18206865</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Vis. 2010 Sep 09;10(11):6</RefSource><PMID Version="1">20884501</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Front Psychol. 2012 Sep 03;3:314</RefSource><PMID Version="1">22969742</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Percept Psychophys. 2004 Oct;66(7):1171-89</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15751474</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Neuron. 2013 May 22;78(4):740-50</RefSource><PMID Version="1">23719167</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Cogn Psychol. 2003 Dec;47(4):333-66</RefSource><PMID Version="1">14642288</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Vis. 2009 Dec 08;9(13):9.1-14</RefSource><PMID Version="1">20055542</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Exp Psychol. 1961 Nov;62:423-32</RefSource><PMID Version="1">13907740</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Perception. 2004;33(9):1049-60</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15560507</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014 Mar;147:2-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">23953664</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Exp Brain Res. 2009 Sep;198(2-3):233-44</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19590862</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Psychol Sci. 2001 May;12(3):205-12</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11437302</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Oct;19(5):820-46</RefSource><PMID Version="1">22829342</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Curr Biol. 2008 Oct 28;18(20):R951-3</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18957248</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Trends Cogn Sci. 2008 Jul;12(7):273-80</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18539519</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Annee Psychol. 1964;64:1-19</RefSource><PMID Version="1">14314721</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Vis. 2010 Apr 29;10(4):23.1-15</RefSource><PMID Version="1">20465341</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Perception. 1980;9(6):719-21</RefSource><PMID Version="1">7220244</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Atten Percept Psychophys. 2013 Jul;75(5):790-811</RefSource><PMID Version="1">23709064</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Exp Brain Res. 2009 Sep;198(1):49-57</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19597804</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Neurosci. 2009 Sep 30;29(39):12265-74</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19793985</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Vis. 2013 Jul 01;13(8):null</RefSource><PMID Version="1">23818678</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Curr Biol. 2002 Mar 5;12(5):359-68</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11882286</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Exp Brain Res. 2003 Sep;152(2):198-210</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12879178</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jun 9;106(23):9169-73</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19458252</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Vis. 2006 Aug 23;6(9):974-81</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17083289</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Jun;20(3):403-52</RefSource><PMID Version="1">23397235</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Behav Res Methods. 2013 Dec;45(4):972-98</RefSource><PMID Version="1">23572250</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Vision Res. 2003 Sep;43(21):2245-53</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12885378</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Neurosci Methods. 2007 May 15;162(1-2):8-13</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17254636</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Neurosci. 2007 May 30;27(22):5879-84</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17537958</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Vis. 2009 Nov 13;9(12):7.1-16</RefSource><PMID Version="1">20053098</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 May;72(4):1120-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">20436205</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013;66(2):319-37</RefSource><PMID Version="1">22950887</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Exp Brain Res. 2009 Sep;198(2-3):221-31</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19352639</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Exp Brain Res. 2008 Mar;185(3):521-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17962929</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Neurosci. 2012 Nov 7;32(45):16040-50</RefSource><PMID Version="1">23136440</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Neurosci. 2012 Feb 15;32(7):2276-86</RefSource><PMID Version="1">22396403</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Eur J Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;26(4):253-4</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21424218</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Neurosci. 1987 Oct;7(10):3215-29</RefSource><PMID Version="1">3668625</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Curr Biol. 2006 Mar 7;16(5):472-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16527741</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Psychol Rev. 1986 Apr;93(2):180-206</RefSource><PMID Version="1">3714927</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Trends Cogn Sci. 2003 May;7(5):214-218</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12757823</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Percept Psychophys. 2005 Apr;67(3):531-44</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16119399</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>PLoS One. 2007 Dec 05;2(12):e1253</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18060050</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Percept Psychophys. 1991 Mar;49(3):245-56</RefSource><PMID Version="1">2011462</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Vis. 2010 May 01;10(5):2</RefSource><PMID Version="1">20616132</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Vision Res. 2003 Oct;43(23):2403-12</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12972391</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Percept Psychophys. 2006 Oct;68(7):1113-23</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17355036</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Brain. 1983 Sep;106 (Pt 3):623-42</RefSource><PMID Version="1">6640273</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Neurosci Lett. 2004 Mar 4;357(2):119-22</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15036589</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Exp Brain Res. 2011 May;210(3-4):539-47</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21287154</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 Jul;73(5):1604-13</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21387079</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Nat Neurosci. 2002 Apr;5(4):382-5</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11896397</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Neurosci. 2013 Sep 11;33(37):14633-7</RefSource><PMID Version="1">24027264</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Trends Neurosci. 2001 Jun;24(6):335-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11356505</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Nat Neurosci. 2010 Aug;13(8):1020-6</RefSource><PMID Version="1">20581842</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Vision Res. 2007 Mar;47(5):687-705</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17254624</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Jan 22;271(1535):139-46</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15058389</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Nat Neurosci. 2004 Jul;7(7):773-8</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15195098</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Vis. 2009 Jul 09;9(7):5</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19761320</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Atten Percept Psychophys. 2012 Jan;74(1):185-93</RefSource><PMID Version="1">22033949</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Nat Neurosci. 2001 Jul;4(7):759-65</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11426234</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Proc Biol Sci. 1997 Mar 22;264(1380):393-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9107055</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Iperception. 2012;3(3):159-65</RefSource><PMID Version="1">23145276</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Nature. 2007 Apr 19;446(7138):912-5</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17410125</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e54798</RefSource><PMID Version="1">23349971</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Conscious Cogn. 2011 Dec;20(4):1518-31</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21807537</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Conscious Cogn. 2010 Mar;19(1):364-79</RefSource><PMID Version="1">20056554</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Vision Res. 2005 May;45(10):1275-84</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15733960</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Jan 7;268(1462):31-8</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12123295</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Psychol Bull. 1980 Nov;88(3):638-67</RefSource><PMID Version="1">7003641</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Nature. 2003 Feb 27;421(6926):911</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12606990</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Percept Psychophys. 2008 Aug;70(6):955-68</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18717383</PMID></CommentsCorrections></CommentsCorrectionsList><OtherID Source="NLM">PMC4441030</OtherID><KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM"><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">SJ</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">TOJ</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">duration</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">inconsistent</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">perception</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">time</Keyword></KeywordList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2014</Year><Month>08</Month><Day>12</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="revised"><Year>2014</Year><Month>08</Month><Day>16</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2015</Year><Month>6</Month><Day>3</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2014</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>0</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2014</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>0</Hour><Minute>1</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>epublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">26034565</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1068/i0675</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC4441030</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Asie/explor/AustralieFrV1/Data/PubMed/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003255 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 003255 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Asie
|area= AustralieFrV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Curation
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:26034565
|texte= Differences in perceptual latency estimated from judgments of temporal order, simultaneity and duration are inconsistent.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:26034565" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a AustralieFrV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |