The forest or the trees: preference for global over local image processing is reversed by prior experience in honeybees.
Identifieur interne : 003073 ( PubMed/Curation ); précédent : 003072; suivant : 003074The forest or the trees: preference for global over local image processing is reversed by prior experience in honeybees.
Auteurs : Aurore Avarguès-Weber [France] ; Adrian G. Dyer [Australie] ; Noha Ferrah [Australie] ; Martin Giurfa [France]Source :
- Proceedings. Biological sciences [ 1471-2954 ] ; 2015.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- MESH :
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
Abstract
Traditional models of insect vision have assumed that insects are only capable of low-level analysis of local cues and are incapable of global, holistic perception. However, recent studies on honeybee (Apis mellifera) vision have refuted this view by showing that this insect also processes complex visual information by using spatial configurations or relational rules. In the light of these findings, we asked whether bees prioritize global configurations or local cues by setting these two levels of image analysis in competition. We trained individual free-flying honeybees to discriminate hierarchical visual stimuli within a Y-maze and tested bees with novel stimuli in which local and/or global cues were manipulated. We demonstrate that even when local information is accessible, bees prefer global information, thus relying mainly on the object's spatial configuration rather than on elemental, local information. This preference can be reversed if bees are pre-trained to discriminate isolated local cues. In this case, bees prefer the hierarchical stimuli with the local elements previously primed even if they build an incorrect global configuration. Pre-training with local cues induces a generic attentional bias towards any local elements as local information is prioritized in the test, even if the local cues used in the test are different from the pre-trained ones. Our results thus underline the plasticity of visual processing in insects and provide new insights for the comparative analysis of visual recognition in humans and animals.
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2014.2384
PubMed: 25473017
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream PubMed, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :003183
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:25473017Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">The forest or the trees: preference for global over local image processing is reversed by prior experience in honeybees.</title><author><name sortKey="Avargues Weber, Aurore" sort="Avargues Weber, Aurore" uniqKey="Avargues Weber A" first="Aurore" last="Avarguès-Weber">Aurore Avarguès-Weber</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale, Université de Toulouse; UPS, 118 route de Narbonne, Toulouse Cedex 9 31062, France Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale, CNRS, 118 route de Narbonne, Toulouse Cedex 9 31062, France aurore.avargues-weber@univ-tlse3.fr.</nlm:affiliation><country wicri:rule="url">France</country><wicri:regionArea>Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale, Université de Toulouse; UPS, 118 route de Narbonne, Toulouse Cedex 9 31062, France Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale, CNRS, 118 route de Narbonne, Toulouse Cedex 9 31062</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Dyer, Adrian G" sort="Dyer, Adrian G" uniqKey="Dyer A" first="Adrian G" last="Dyer">Adrian G. Dyer</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Physiology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia School of Media and Communication, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Australie</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Physiology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia School of Media and Communication, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria 3000</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ferrah, Noha" sort="Ferrah, Noha" uniqKey="Ferrah N" first="Noha" last="Ferrah">Noha Ferrah</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Physiology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Australie</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Physiology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Giurfa, Martin" sort="Giurfa, Martin" uniqKey="Giurfa M" first="Martin" last="Giurfa">Martin Giurfa</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale, Université de Toulouse; UPS, 118 route de Narbonne, Toulouse Cedex 9 31062, France Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale, CNRS, 118 route de Narbonne, Toulouse Cedex 9 31062, France.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">France</country><wicri:regionArea>Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale, Université de Toulouse; UPS, 118 route de Narbonne, Toulouse Cedex 9 31062, France Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale, CNRS, 118 route de Narbonne, Toulouse Cedex 9 31062</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2015">2015</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:25473017</idno><idno type="pmid">25473017</idno><idno type="doi">10.1098/rspb.2014.2384</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">003183</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">003183</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">003073</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">003073</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">The forest or the trees: preference for global over local image processing is reversed by prior experience in honeybees.</title><author><name sortKey="Avargues Weber, Aurore" sort="Avargues Weber, Aurore" uniqKey="Avargues Weber A" first="Aurore" last="Avarguès-Weber">Aurore Avarguès-Weber</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale, Université de Toulouse; UPS, 118 route de Narbonne, Toulouse Cedex 9 31062, France Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale, CNRS, 118 route de Narbonne, Toulouse Cedex 9 31062, France aurore.avargues-weber@univ-tlse3.fr.</nlm:affiliation><country wicri:rule="url">France</country><wicri:regionArea>Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale, Université de Toulouse; UPS, 118 route de Narbonne, Toulouse Cedex 9 31062, France Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale, CNRS, 118 route de Narbonne, Toulouse Cedex 9 31062</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Dyer, Adrian G" sort="Dyer, Adrian G" uniqKey="Dyer A" first="Adrian G" last="Dyer">Adrian G. Dyer</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Physiology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia School of Media and Communication, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Australie</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Physiology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia School of Media and Communication, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria 3000</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ferrah, Noha" sort="Ferrah, Noha" uniqKey="Ferrah N" first="Noha" last="Ferrah">Noha Ferrah</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Physiology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Australie</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Physiology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Giurfa, Martin" sort="Giurfa, Martin" uniqKey="Giurfa M" first="Martin" last="Giurfa">Martin Giurfa</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale, Université de Toulouse; UPS, 118 route de Narbonne, Toulouse Cedex 9 31062, France Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale, CNRS, 118 route de Narbonne, Toulouse Cedex 9 31062, France.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">France</country><wicri:regionArea>Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale, Université de Toulouse; UPS, 118 route de Narbonne, Toulouse Cedex 9 31062, France Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale, CNRS, 118 route de Narbonne, Toulouse Cedex 9 31062</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Proceedings. Biological sciences</title><idno type="eISSN">1471-2954</idno><imprint><date when="2015" type="published">2015</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Animals</term><term>Bees (physiology)</term><term>Behavior, Animal</term><term>Cues</term><term>Forests</term><term>Pattern Recognition, Visual</term><term>Photic Stimulation</term><term>Recognition (Psychology)</term><term>Visual Perception</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Abeilles (physiologie)</term><term>Animaux</term><term>Comportement animal</term><term>Forêts</term><term>Perception visuelle</term><term>Reconnaissance (psychologie)</term><term>Reconnaissance visuelle des formes</term><term>Signaux</term><term>Stimulation lumineuse</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiologie" xml:lang="fr"><term>Abeilles</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Bees</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Animals</term><term>Behavior, Animal</term><term>Cues</term><term>Forests</term><term>Pattern Recognition, Visual</term><term>Photic Stimulation</term><term>Recognition (Psychology)</term><term>Visual Perception</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Animaux</term><term>Comportement animal</term><term>Forêts</term><term>Perception visuelle</term><term>Reconnaissance (psychologie)</term><term>Reconnaissance visuelle des formes</term><term>Signaux</term><term>Stimulation lumineuse</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Traditional models of insect vision have assumed that insects are only capable of low-level analysis of local cues and are incapable of global, holistic perception. However, recent studies on honeybee (Apis mellifera) vision have refuted this view by showing that this insect also processes complex visual information by using spatial configurations or relational rules. In the light of these findings, we asked whether bees prioritize global configurations or local cues by setting these two levels of image analysis in competition. We trained individual free-flying honeybees to discriminate hierarchical visual stimuli within a Y-maze and tested bees with novel stimuli in which local and/or global cues were manipulated. We demonstrate that even when local information is accessible, bees prefer global information, thus relying mainly on the object's spatial configuration rather than on elemental, local information. This preference can be reversed if bees are pre-trained to discriminate isolated local cues. In this case, bees prefer the hierarchical stimuli with the local elements previously primed even if they build an incorrect global configuration. Pre-training with local cues induces a generic attentional bias towards any local elements as local information is prioritized in the test, even if the local cues used in the test are different from the pre-trained ones. Our results thus underline the plasticity of visual processing in insects and provide new insights for the comparative analysis of visual recognition in humans and animals.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">25473017</PMID><DateCreated><Year>2014</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>04</Day></DateCreated><DateCompleted><Year>2015</Year><Month>09</Month><Day>14</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2017</Year><Month>02</Month><Day>20</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1471-2954</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>282</Volume><Issue>1799</Issue><PubDate><Year>2015</Year><Month>Jan</Month><Day>22</Day></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Proceedings. Biological sciences</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Proc. Biol. Sci.</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>The forest or the trees: preference for global over local image processing is reversed by prior experience in honeybees.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>20142384</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1098/rspb.2014.2384</ELocationID><ELocationID EIdType="pii" ValidYN="Y">20142384</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>Traditional models of insect vision have assumed that insects are only capable of low-level analysis of local cues and are incapable of global, holistic perception. However, recent studies on honeybee (Apis mellifera) vision have refuted this view by showing that this insect also processes complex visual information by using spatial configurations or relational rules. In the light of these findings, we asked whether bees prioritize global configurations or local cues by setting these two levels of image analysis in competition. We trained individual free-flying honeybees to discriminate hierarchical visual stimuli within a Y-maze and tested bees with novel stimuli in which local and/or global cues were manipulated. We demonstrate that even when local information is accessible, bees prefer global information, thus relying mainly on the object's spatial configuration rather than on elemental, local information. This preference can be reversed if bees are pre-trained to discriminate isolated local cues. In this case, bees prefer the hierarchical stimuli with the local elements previously primed even if they build an incorrect global configuration. Pre-training with local cues induces a generic attentional bias towards any local elements as local information is prioritized in the test, even if the local cues used in the test are different from the pre-trained ones. Our results thus underline the plasticity of visual processing in insects and provide new insights for the comparative analysis of visual recognition in humans and animals.</AbstractText><CopyrightInformation>© 2014 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.</CopyrightInformation></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Avarguès-Weber</LastName><ForeName>Aurore</ForeName><Initials>A</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale, Université de Toulouse; UPS, 118 route de Narbonne, Toulouse Cedex 9 31062, France Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale, CNRS, 118 route de Narbonne, Toulouse Cedex 9 31062, France aurore.avargues-weber@univ-tlse3.fr.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Dyer</LastName><ForeName>Adrian G</ForeName><Initials>AG</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Physiology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia School of Media and Communication, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Ferrah</LastName><ForeName>Noha</ForeName><Initials>N</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Physiology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Giurfa</LastName><ForeName>Martin</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale, Université de Toulouse; UPS, 118 route de Narbonne, Toulouse Cedex 9 31062, France Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale, CNRS, 118 route de Narbonne, Toulouse Cedex 9 31062, France.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>England</Country><MedlineTA>Proc Biol Sci</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>101245157</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0962-8452</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><CommentsCorrectionsList><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Perception. 1987;16(1):89-101</RefSource><PMID Version="1">3671045</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Exp Psychol. 1980 Jun;109(2):160-74</RefSource><PMID Version="1">7381367</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jan 10;103(2):449-54</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16407167</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Nat Neurosci. 2000 Feb;3(2):191-7</RefSource><PMID Version="1">10649576</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Behav Brain Res. 2005 Jun 3;161(1):8-17</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15904705</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1997 Apr;23(2):429-42</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9104003</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Comp Psychol. 2003 Jun;117(2):200-8</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12856790</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Prog Brain Res. 2006;155:23-36</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17027377</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Annu Rev Neurosci. 1996;19:577-621</RefSource><PMID Version="1">8833455</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Nature. 2002 Jan 17;415(6869):318-20</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11797008</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Anim Cogn. 2002 Mar;5(1):27-31</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11957399</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1982 Aug;8(4):562-81</RefSource><PMID Version="1">6214608</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Annu Rev Entomol. 2010;55:267-84</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19728835</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>PLoS One. 2009;4(6):e5989</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19543525</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Jul 22;278(1715):2207-15</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21147801</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Sci Am. 2013 Dec;309(6):62-7</RefSource><PMID Version="1">24383366</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Nat Neurosci. 2000 Aug;3(8):759-63</RefSource><PMID Version="1">10903567</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Annu Rev Entomol. 2011;56:423-43</RefSource><PMID Version="1">20868283</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Psychol Bull. 1992 Jul;112(1):24-38</RefSource><PMID Version="1">1529037</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Neuropsychologia. 1997 Mar;35(3):343-8</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9051682</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e19669</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21602920</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Curr Biol. 2003 Feb 18;13(4):342-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12593802</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Comp Psychol. 2003 Mar;117(1):15-23</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12735359</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Vision Res. 1997 Jun;37(12):1673-82</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9231232</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004 Apr;5(4):291-303</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15034554</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Nat Neurosci. 2003 Jun;6(6):579-86</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12717438</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Exp Biol. 2009 Sep 1;212(17):2721-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19684204</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Curr Biol. 2000 Oct 19;10(20):R753-6</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11069101</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Exp Biol. 2012 Feb 1;215(Pt 3):387-95</RefSource><PMID Version="1">22246247</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Behav Brain Res. 2010 Feb 11;207(1):51-60</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19800926</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Anim Behav. 1999 Feb;57(2):315-324</RefSource><PMID Version="1">10049470</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Neuropsychologia. 2000;38(4):475-83</RefSource><PMID Version="1">10683397</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Exp Biol. 2010 Feb 15;213(4):593-601</RefSource><PMID Version="1">20118310</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Neuroreport. 2008 Feb 12;19(3):287-91</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18303568</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Exp Biol. 2005 Sep;208(Pt 17):3233-47</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16109886</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Curr Biol. 2012 May 22;22(10):927-32</RefSource><PMID Version="1">22521785</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Cogn Psychol. 1999 Mar;38(2):291-316</RefSource><PMID Version="1">10090805</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2001 Jan;27(1):3-16</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11199512</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Apr 26;108(17):7230-5</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21482795</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Mar 22;278(1707):898-905</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21068040</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Perception. 2005;34(1):77-86</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15773608</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Exp Biol. 2002 Feb;205(Pt 4):559-72</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11893770</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Vision Res. 1979;19(3):255-61</RefSource><PMID Version="1">442550</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1997 Aug;7(4):505-13</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9287201</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Exp Biol. 2006 Mar;209(Pt 6):987-93</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16513924</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Percept Psychophys. 1993 Dec;54(6):773-84</RefSource><PMID Version="1">8134247</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Exp Biol. 2012 Jul 15;215(Pt 14):2515-23</RefSource><PMID Version="1">22723491</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Behav Brain Res. 2003 Oct 17;145(1-2):161-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">14529814</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Nature. 2004 Jun 17;429(6993):758-61</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15201910</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Apr 1;111(13):5006-11</RefSource><PMID Version="1">24639490</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Front Neurosci. 2012 Jun 18;6:88</RefSource><PMID Version="1">22719721</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Psychol Rev. 2005 Oct;112(4):715-43</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16262466</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Curr Biol. 2013 Apr 22;23(8):684-90</RefSource><PMID Version="1">23583550</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Front Zool. 2011 Aug 27;8:21</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21871114</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Curr Biol. 2009 Nov 3;19(20):R935-7</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19889365</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Mar 22;278(1707):952-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21147796</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Exp Biol. 2005 Dec;208(Pt 24):4709-14</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16326952</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 May 8;109(19):7481-6</RefSource><PMID Version="1">22517740</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Science. 2006 Feb 3;311(5761):670-4</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16456083</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Exp Psychol Gen. 1991 Jun;120(2):173-89</RefSource><PMID Version="1">1830610</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Percept Psychophys. 1979 Mar;25(3):225-31</RefSource><PMID Version="1">461079</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int Rev Neurobiol. 2011;99:51-85</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21906536</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Cogn Neurosci. 1996 Summer;8(3):197-230</RefSource><PMID Version="1">23968149</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1998 Jul;24(3):278-90</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9679305</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Nature. 1996 Aug 1;382(6590):458-61</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18610516</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>PLoS One. 2008;3(12):e4086</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19116650</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Psychon Bull Rev. 2001 Sep;8(3):454-69</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11700896</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Anim Cogn. 2001 Nov;4(3-4):171-7</RefSource><PMID Version="1">24777507</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2014 Jun;200(6):449-61</RefSource><PMID Version="1">24788332</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Perception. 1990;19(5):617-29</RefSource><PMID Version="1">2102996</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Oct 22;280(1769):20131677</RefSource><PMID Version="1">23966644</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Exp Biol. 2012 Feb 1;215(Pt 3):397-404</RefSource><PMID Version="1">22246248</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 Jul;24(2):228-36</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15993761</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Exp Anal Behav. 2003 Jul;80(1):29-42</RefSource><PMID Version="1">13677607</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Jan 18;5:188</RefSource><PMID Version="1">22279432</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Anim Cogn. 2006 Oct;9(4):247-56</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16909234</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Perception. 1983;12(3):239-54</RefSource><PMID Version="1">6669451</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Neuroimage. 2002 Nov;17(3):1266-76</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12414266</PMID></CommentsCorrections></CommentsCorrectionsList><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000818" MajorTopicYN="N">Animals</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D001516" MajorTopicYN="N">Bees</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="Y">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D001522" MajorTopicYN="N">Behavior, Animal</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003463" MajorTopicYN="N">Cues</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D065928" MajorTopicYN="N">Forests</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010364" MajorTopicYN="N">Pattern Recognition, Visual</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010775" MajorTopicYN="N">Photic Stimulation</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D021641" MajorTopicYN="Y">Recognition (Psychology)</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014796" MajorTopicYN="N">Visual Perception</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList><OtherID Source="NLM">PMC4286040</OtherID><KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM"><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Apis mellifera</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">attention</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">honeybee</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">perceptual grouping</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">priming</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">vision</Keyword></KeywordList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2014</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>5</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2014</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>5</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2015</Year><Month>9</Month><Day>15</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">25473017</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">rspb.2014.2384</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1098/rspb.2014.2384</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC4286040</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Asie/explor/AustralieFrV1/Data/PubMed/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003073 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 003073 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Asie
|area= AustralieFrV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Curation
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:25473017
|texte= The forest or the trees: preference for global over local image processing is reversed by prior experience in honeybees.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:25473017" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a AustralieFrV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |