High Modulus Biodegradable Polyurethanes for Vascular Stents: Evaluation of Accelerated in vitro Degradation and Cell Viability of Degradation Products.
Identifieur interne : 002D15 ( PubMed/Curation ); précédent : 002D14; suivant : 002D16High Modulus Biodegradable Polyurethanes for Vascular Stents: Evaluation of Accelerated in vitro Degradation and Cell Viability of Degradation Products.
Auteurs : Melissa Sgarioto [France] ; Raju Adhikari [Australie] ; Pathiraja A. Gunatillake [Australie] ; Tim Moore [Australie] ; John Patterson [Australie] ; Marie-Danielle Nagel [France] ; François Malherbe [Australie]Source :
- Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology [ 2296-4185 ] ; 2015.
Abstract
We have recently reported the mechanical properties and hydrolytic degradation behavior of a series of NovoSorb™ biodegradable polyurethanes (PUs) prepared by varying the hard segment (HS) weight percentage from 60 to 100. In this study, the in vitro degradation behavior of these PUs with and without extracellular matrix (ECM) coating was investigated under accelerated hydrolytic degradation (phosphate buffer saline; PBS/70°C) conditions. The mass loss at different time intervals and the effect of aqueous degradation products on the viability and growth of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) were examined. The results showed that PUs with HS 80% and below completely disintegrated leaving no visual polymer residue at 18 weeks and the degradation medium turned acidic due to the accumulation of products from the soft segment (SS) degradation. As expected the PU with the lowest HS was the fastest to degrade. The accumulated degradation products, when tested undiluted, showed viability of about 40% for HUVEC cells. However, the viability was over 80% when the solution was diluted to 50% and below. The growth of HUVEC cells is similar to but not identical to that observed with tissue culture polystyrene standard (TCPS). The results from this in vitro study suggested that the PUs in the series degraded primarily due to the SS degradation and the cell viability of the accumulated acidic degradation products showed poor viability to HUVEC cells when tested undiluted, however particles released to the degradation medium showed cell viability over 80%.
DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2015.00052
PubMed: 26000274
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream PubMed, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :002D91
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:26000274Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">High Modulus Biodegradable Polyurethanes for Vascular Stents: Evaluation of Accelerated in vitro Degradation and Cell Viability of Degradation Products.</title><author><name sortKey="Sgarioto, Melissa" sort="Sgarioto, Melissa" uniqKey="Sgarioto M" first="Melissa" last="Sgarioto">Melissa Sgarioto</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Faculty of Life and Social Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology , Hawthorn, VIC , Australia ; UMR CNRS 7338 Biomécanique et Bioingénierie, Centre de Recherches de Royallieu, Université de Technologie de Compiègne , Compiègne , France.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">France</country><wicri:regionArea>Faculty of Life and Social Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology , Hawthorn, VIC , Australia ; UMR CNRS 7338 Biomécanique et Bioingénierie, Centre de Recherches de Royallieu, Université de Technologie de Compiègne , Compiègne </wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Adhikari, Raju" sort="Adhikari, Raju" uniqKey="Adhikari R" first="Raju" last="Adhikari">Raju Adhikari</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>CSIRO Manufacturing Flagship , Clayton, VIC , Australia.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Australie</country><wicri:regionArea>CSIRO Manufacturing Flagship , Clayton, VIC </wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Gunatillake, Pathiraja A" sort="Gunatillake, Pathiraja A" uniqKey="Gunatillake P" first="Pathiraja A" last="Gunatillake">Pathiraja A. Gunatillake</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>CSIRO Manufacturing Flagship , Clayton, VIC , Australia.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Australie</country><wicri:regionArea>CSIRO Manufacturing Flagship , Clayton, VIC </wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Moore, Tim" sort="Moore, Tim" uniqKey="Moore T" first="Tim" last="Moore">Tim Moore</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>PolyNovo Biomaterials Pty Ltd. , Port Melbourne, VIC , Australia.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Australie</country><wicri:regionArea>PolyNovo Biomaterials Pty Ltd. , Port Melbourne, VIC </wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Patterson, John" sort="Patterson, John" uniqKey="Patterson J" first="John" last="Patterson">John Patterson</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Faculty of Life and Social Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology , Hawthorn, VIC , Australia.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Australie</country><wicri:regionArea>Faculty of Life and Social Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology , Hawthorn, VIC </wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Nagel, Marie Danielle" sort="Nagel, Marie Danielle" uniqKey="Nagel M" first="Marie-Danielle" last="Nagel">Marie-Danielle Nagel</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>UMR CNRS 7338 Biomécanique et Bioingénierie, Centre de Recherches de Royallieu, Université de Technologie de Compiègne , Compiègne , France.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">France</country><wicri:regionArea>UMR CNRS 7338 Biomécanique et Bioingénierie, Centre de Recherches de Royallieu, Université de Technologie de Compiègne , Compiègne </wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Malherbe, Francois" sort="Malherbe, Francois" uniqKey="Malherbe F" first="François" last="Malherbe">François Malherbe</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Faculty of Life and Social Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology , Hawthorn, VIC , Australia.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Australie</country><wicri:regionArea>Faculty of Life and Social Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology , Hawthorn, VIC </wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2015">2015</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:26000274</idno><idno type="pmid">26000274</idno><idno type="doi">10.3389/fbioe.2015.00052</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">002D91</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">002D91</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">002D15</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">002D15</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">High Modulus Biodegradable Polyurethanes for Vascular Stents: Evaluation of Accelerated in vitro Degradation and Cell Viability of Degradation Products.</title><author><name sortKey="Sgarioto, Melissa" sort="Sgarioto, Melissa" uniqKey="Sgarioto M" first="Melissa" last="Sgarioto">Melissa Sgarioto</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Faculty of Life and Social Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology , Hawthorn, VIC , Australia ; UMR CNRS 7338 Biomécanique et Bioingénierie, Centre de Recherches de Royallieu, Université de Technologie de Compiègne , Compiègne , France.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">France</country><wicri:regionArea>Faculty of Life and Social Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology , Hawthorn, VIC , Australia ; UMR CNRS 7338 Biomécanique et Bioingénierie, Centre de Recherches de Royallieu, Université de Technologie de Compiègne , Compiègne </wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Adhikari, Raju" sort="Adhikari, Raju" uniqKey="Adhikari R" first="Raju" last="Adhikari">Raju Adhikari</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>CSIRO Manufacturing Flagship , Clayton, VIC , Australia.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Australie</country><wicri:regionArea>CSIRO Manufacturing Flagship , Clayton, VIC </wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Gunatillake, Pathiraja A" sort="Gunatillake, Pathiraja A" uniqKey="Gunatillake P" first="Pathiraja A" last="Gunatillake">Pathiraja A. Gunatillake</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>CSIRO Manufacturing Flagship , Clayton, VIC , Australia.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Australie</country><wicri:regionArea>CSIRO Manufacturing Flagship , Clayton, VIC </wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Moore, Tim" sort="Moore, Tim" uniqKey="Moore T" first="Tim" last="Moore">Tim Moore</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>PolyNovo Biomaterials Pty Ltd. , Port Melbourne, VIC , Australia.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Australie</country><wicri:regionArea>PolyNovo Biomaterials Pty Ltd. , Port Melbourne, VIC </wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Patterson, John" sort="Patterson, John" uniqKey="Patterson J" first="John" last="Patterson">John Patterson</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Faculty of Life and Social Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology , Hawthorn, VIC , Australia.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Australie</country><wicri:regionArea>Faculty of Life and Social Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology , Hawthorn, VIC </wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Nagel, Marie Danielle" sort="Nagel, Marie Danielle" uniqKey="Nagel M" first="Marie-Danielle" last="Nagel">Marie-Danielle Nagel</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>UMR CNRS 7338 Biomécanique et Bioingénierie, Centre de Recherches de Royallieu, Université de Technologie de Compiègne , Compiègne , France.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">France</country><wicri:regionArea>UMR CNRS 7338 Biomécanique et Bioingénierie, Centre de Recherches de Royallieu, Université de Technologie de Compiègne , Compiègne </wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Malherbe, Francois" sort="Malherbe, Francois" uniqKey="Malherbe F" first="François" last="Malherbe">François Malherbe</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Faculty of Life and Social Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology , Hawthorn, VIC , Australia.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Australie</country><wicri:regionArea>Faculty of Life and Social Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology , Hawthorn, VIC </wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology</title><idno type="ISSN">2296-4185</idno><imprint><date when="2015" type="published">2015</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">We have recently reported the mechanical properties and hydrolytic degradation behavior of a series of NovoSorb™ biodegradable polyurethanes (PUs) prepared by varying the hard segment (HS) weight percentage from 60 to 100. In this study, the in vitro degradation behavior of these PUs with and without extracellular matrix (ECM) coating was investigated under accelerated hydrolytic degradation (phosphate buffer saline; PBS/70°C) conditions. The mass loss at different time intervals and the effect of aqueous degradation products on the viability and growth of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) were examined. The results showed that PUs with HS 80% and below completely disintegrated leaving no visual polymer residue at 18 weeks and the degradation medium turned acidic due to the accumulation of products from the soft segment (SS) degradation. As expected the PU with the lowest HS was the fastest to degrade. The accumulated degradation products, when tested undiluted, showed viability of about 40% for HUVEC cells. However, the viability was over 80% when the solution was diluted to 50% and below. The growth of HUVEC cells is similar to but not identical to that observed with tissue culture polystyrene standard (TCPS). The results from this in vitro study suggested that the PUs in the series degraded primarily due to the SS degradation and the cell viability of the accumulated acidic degradation products showed poor viability to HUVEC cells when tested undiluted, however particles released to the degradation medium showed cell viability over 80%.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="PubMed-not-MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">26000274</PMID><DateCreated><Year>2015</Year><Month>05</Month><Day>22</Day></DateCreated><DateCompleted><Year>2015</Year><Month>05</Month><Day>22</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2017</Year><Month>02</Month><Day>20</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Electronic-eCollection"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">2296-4185</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>3</Volume><PubDate><Year>2015</Year></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Front Bioeng Biotechnol</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>High Modulus Biodegradable Polyurethanes for Vascular Stents: Evaluation of Accelerated in vitro Degradation and Cell Viability of Degradation Products.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>52</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.3389/fbioe.2015.00052</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>We have recently reported the mechanical properties and hydrolytic degradation behavior of a series of NovoSorb™ biodegradable polyurethanes (PUs) prepared by varying the hard segment (HS) weight percentage from 60 to 100. In this study, the in vitro degradation behavior of these PUs with and without extracellular matrix (ECM) coating was investigated under accelerated hydrolytic degradation (phosphate buffer saline; PBS/70°C) conditions. The mass loss at different time intervals and the effect of aqueous degradation products on the viability and growth of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) were examined. The results showed that PUs with HS 80% and below completely disintegrated leaving no visual polymer residue at 18 weeks and the degradation medium turned acidic due to the accumulation of products from the soft segment (SS) degradation. As expected the PU with the lowest HS was the fastest to degrade. The accumulated degradation products, when tested undiluted, showed viability of about 40% for HUVEC cells. However, the viability was over 80% when the solution was diluted to 50% and below. The growth of HUVEC cells is similar to but not identical to that observed with tissue culture polystyrene standard (TCPS). The results from this in vitro study suggested that the PUs in the series degraded primarily due to the SS degradation and the cell viability of the accumulated acidic degradation products showed poor viability to HUVEC cells when tested undiluted, however particles released to the degradation medium showed cell viability over 80%.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Sgarioto</LastName><ForeName>Melissa</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Faculty of Life and Social Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology , Hawthorn, VIC , Australia ; UMR CNRS 7338 Biomécanique et Bioingénierie, Centre de Recherches de Royallieu, Université de Technologie de Compiègne , Compiègne , France.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Adhikari</LastName><ForeName>Raju</ForeName><Initials>R</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>CSIRO Manufacturing Flagship , Clayton, VIC , Australia.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Gunatillake</LastName><ForeName>Pathiraja A</ForeName><Initials>PA</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>CSIRO Manufacturing Flagship , Clayton, VIC , Australia.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Moore</LastName><ForeName>Tim</ForeName><Initials>T</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>PolyNovo Biomaterials Pty Ltd. , Port Melbourne, VIC , Australia.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Patterson</LastName><ForeName>John</ForeName><Initials>J</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Faculty of Life and Social Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology , Hawthorn, VIC , Australia.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Nagel</LastName><ForeName>Marie-Danielle</ForeName><Initials>MD</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>UMR CNRS 7338 Biomécanique et Bioingénierie, Centre de Recherches de Royallieu, Université de Technologie de Compiègne , Compiègne , France.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Malherbe</LastName><ForeName>François</ForeName><Initials>F</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Faculty of Life and Social Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology , Hawthorn, VIC , Australia.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2015</Year><Month>05</Month><Day>06</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Switzerland</Country><MedlineTA>Front Bioeng Biotechnol</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>101632513</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>2296-4185</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CommentsCorrectionsList><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Biomed Mater Res A. 2006 May;77(2):304-12</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16400656</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Circulation. 2012 May 15;125(19):2343-53</RefSource><PMID Version="1">22508795</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Biomed Mater Res. 1993 Oct;27(10 ):1341-8</RefSource><PMID Version="1">8245048</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Biomaterials. 2011 Jan;32(2):419-29</RefSource><PMID Version="1">20864156</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Burn Care Res. 2009 Jul-Aug;30(4):717-28</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19506497</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985 Mar 15;151(6):798-800</RefSource><PMID Version="1">3919587</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Tissue Eng. 2002 Oct;8(5):771-85</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12459056</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Tissue Eng Part A. 2008 Mar;14(3):369-78</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18333789</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Biomaterials. 2008 Mar;29(7):825-33</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18035412</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1996 Oct;12 (3):321-30</RefSource><PMID Version="1">8896475</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Biomaterials. 1990 May;11(4):291-5</RefSource><PMID Version="1">2116925</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Biomaterials. 2008 Jul;29(20):2941-53</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18440630</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2014 Nov;102(8):1711-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">24668742</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Biotechnol Annu Rev. 2006;12:301-47</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17045198</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Biomaterials. 2007 Dec;28(36):5407-17</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17915310</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>PLoS One. 2010 Apr 06;5(4):e10051</RefSource><PMID Version="1">20386614</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Biomed Mater Res. 1989 Dec;23(A3 Suppl):311-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">2613741</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Pharm Res. 2008 Oct;25(10):2387-99</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18516665</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Heart. 2003 Jun;89(6):651-6</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12748224</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Tissue Eng. 2006 Jul;12 (7):1945-53</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16889524</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Lancet. 2015 Jan 3;385(9962):10-2</RefSource><PMID Version="1">25230592</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1998 Oct;45(2):202-7</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9786403</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Biomaterials. 2000 Jun;21(12):1247-58</RefSource><PMID Version="1">10811306</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Biomed Mater Res A. 2003 Feb 1;64(2):242-8</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12522810</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2010 Apr;21(4):1081-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">20012163</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Biomaterials. 2004 Jan;25(1):85-96</RefSource><PMID Version="1">14580912</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Biomed Mater Res A. 2006 Feb;76(2):377-85</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16270347</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Biomed Mater Res A. 2008 Jun 15;85(4):972-82</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17907243</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008 Jul-Aug;1780(7-8):995-1003</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18485917</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Med Device Technol. 1995 Apr;6(3):7-10</RefSource><PMID Version="1">10155381</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Ann Plast Surg. 1992 Apr;28(4):342-53</RefSource><PMID Version="1">1596068</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Oct 4;58(15):1578-88</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21958884</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Biomed Mater Res. 2002 Sep 5;61(3):493-503</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12115475</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Biomaterials. 2005 May;26(13):1457-66</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15522747</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Biomaterials. 2007 Jan;28(3):423-33</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16979756</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Acta Biomater. 2009 Jul;5(6):1991-2001</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19286433</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Circulation. 2006 Aug 22;114(8):820-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16908762</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Biomed Mater Res A. 2008 Mar 15;84(4):847-55</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17635022</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Biomed Mater Res. 1997 Jul;36(1):65-74</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9212390</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 1999;10 (10 ):1015-45</RefSource><PMID Version="1">10591130</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Biomed Mater Res A. 2007 Sep 1;82(3):669-79</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17323319</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Biomed Mater Res. 2000 Sep 15;51(4):761-70</RefSource><PMID Version="1">10880126</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Biomed Mater. 2008 Dec;3(4):044104</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19029617</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Control Release. 2007 Jul 16;120(1-2):70-8</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17509717</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Eur Cell Mater. 2003 May 20;5:1-16; discussion 16</RefSource><PMID Version="1">14562275</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2010;21(6-7):843-62</RefSource><PMID Version="1">20482988</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Cardiovasc Intervent. 2003;5(1):13-6</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12623560</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Biotechnol Appl Biochem. 2009 Jan;52(Pt 1):1-8</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18402554</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2008 Mar;14(1):3-17</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18454631</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Surg Res. 1996 Feb 1;60(2):327-32</RefSource><PMID Version="1">8598663</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Mol Sci. 2011;12(7):4250-70</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21845076</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Biopolymers. 2010 Aug;93(8):690-707</RefSource><PMID Version="1">20235198</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Biomaterials. 2008 Oct;29(28):3762-70</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18632149</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>C R Biol. 2012 Aug;335(8):520-8</RefSource><PMID Version="1">22938918</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Br J Surg. 1989 Dec;76(12):1259-61</RefSource><PMID Version="1">2605469</PMID></CommentsCorrections></CommentsCorrectionsList><OtherID Source="NLM">PMC4422008</OtherID><KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM"><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">cardiovascular stents</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">cytotoxicity</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">degradation</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">polyurethane</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">properties</Keyword></KeywordList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2014</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>16</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2015</Year><Month>03</Month><Day>27</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2015</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>23</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2015</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>23</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2015</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>23</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>1</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>epublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">26000274</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.3389/fbioe.2015.00052</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC4422008</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Asie/explor/AustralieFrV1/Data/PubMed/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002D15 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 002D15 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Asie
|area= AustralieFrV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Curation
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:26000274
|texte= High Modulus Biodegradable Polyurethanes for Vascular Stents: Evaluation of Accelerated in vitro Degradation and Cell Viability of Degradation Products.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:26000274" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a AustralieFrV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |