Differential Difficulties in Perception of Tashlhiyt Berber Consonant Quantity Contrasts by Native Tashlhiyt Listeners vs. Berber-Naïve French Listeners.
Identifieur interne : 002080 ( PubMed/Curation ); précédent : 002079; suivant : 002081Differential Difficulties in Perception of Tashlhiyt Berber Consonant Quantity Contrasts by Native Tashlhiyt Listeners vs. Berber-Naïve French Listeners.
Auteurs : Pierre A. Hallé [États-Unis] ; Rachid Ridouane [France] ; Catherine T. Best [Australie]Source :
- Frontiers in psychology [ 1664-1078 ] ; 2016.
Abstract
In a discrimination experiment on several Tashlhiyt Berber singleton-geminate contrasts, we find that French listeners encounter substantial difficulty compared to native speakers. Native listeners of Tashlhiyt perform near ceiling level on all contrasts. French listeners perform better on final contrasts such as fit-fitt than initial contrasts such as bi-bbi or sir-ssir. That is, French listeners are more sensitive to silent closure duration in word-final voiceless stops than to either voiced murmur or frication duration of fully voiced stops or voiceless fricatives in word-initial position. We propose, tentatively, that native speakers of French, a language in which gemination is usually not considered to be phonemic, have not acquired quantity contrasts but yet exhibit a presumably universal sensitivity to rhythm, whereby listeners are able to perceive and compare the relative temporal distance between beats given by successive salient phonetic events such as a sequence of vowel nuclei.
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00209
PubMed: 26973551
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream PubMed, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :002106
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:26973551Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Differential Difficulties in Perception of Tashlhiyt Berber Consonant Quantity Contrasts by Native Tashlhiyt Listeners vs. Berber-Naïve French Listeners.</title><author><name sortKey="Halle, Pierre A" sort="Halle, Pierre A" uniqKey="Halle P" first="Pierre A" last="Hallé">Pierre A. Hallé</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Laboratoire Phonétique et Phonologie, Centre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueParis, France; Laboratoire Mémoire et Cognition, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche MédicaleParis, France; Haskins LaboratoriesNew Haven, CT, USA.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>Laboratoire Phonétique et Phonologie, Centre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueParis, France; Laboratoire Mémoire et Cognition, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche MédicaleParis, France; Haskins LaboratoriesNew Haven, CT</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ridouane, Rachid" sort="Ridouane, Rachid" uniqKey="Ridouane R" first="Rachid" last="Ridouane">Rachid Ridouane</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Laboratoire Phonétique et Phonologie, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Paris, France.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">France</country><wicri:regionArea>Laboratoire Phonétique et Phonologie, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Paris</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Best, Catherine T" sort="Best, Catherine T" uniqKey="Best C" first="Catherine T" last="Best">Catherine T. Best</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Haskins LaboratoriesNew Haven, CT, USA; MARCS Institute and School of Humanities and Communication Arts, University of Western SydneySydney, NSW, Australia.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Australie</country><wicri:regionArea>Haskins LaboratoriesNew Haven, CT, USA; MARCS Institute and School of Humanities and Communication Arts, University of Western SydneySydney, NSW</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2016">2016</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:26973551</idno><idno type="pmid">26973551</idno><idno type="doi">10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00209</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">002106</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">002106</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">002080</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">002080</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Differential Difficulties in Perception of Tashlhiyt Berber Consonant Quantity Contrasts by Native Tashlhiyt Listeners vs. Berber-Naïve French Listeners.</title><author><name sortKey="Halle, Pierre A" sort="Halle, Pierre A" uniqKey="Halle P" first="Pierre A" last="Hallé">Pierre A. Hallé</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Laboratoire Phonétique et Phonologie, Centre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueParis, France; Laboratoire Mémoire et Cognition, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche MédicaleParis, France; Haskins LaboratoriesNew Haven, CT, USA.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>Laboratoire Phonétique et Phonologie, Centre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueParis, France; Laboratoire Mémoire et Cognition, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche MédicaleParis, France; Haskins LaboratoriesNew Haven, CT</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ridouane, Rachid" sort="Ridouane, Rachid" uniqKey="Ridouane R" first="Rachid" last="Ridouane">Rachid Ridouane</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Laboratoire Phonétique et Phonologie, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Paris, France.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">France</country><wicri:regionArea>Laboratoire Phonétique et Phonologie, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Paris</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Best, Catherine T" sort="Best, Catherine T" uniqKey="Best C" first="Catherine T" last="Best">Catherine T. Best</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Haskins LaboratoriesNew Haven, CT, USA; MARCS Institute and School of Humanities and Communication Arts, University of Western SydneySydney, NSW, Australia.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Australie</country><wicri:regionArea>Haskins LaboratoriesNew Haven, CT, USA; MARCS Institute and School of Humanities and Communication Arts, University of Western SydneySydney, NSW</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Frontiers in psychology</title><idno type="ISSN">1664-1078</idno><imprint><date when="2016" type="published">2016</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">In a discrimination experiment on several Tashlhiyt Berber singleton-geminate contrasts, we find that French listeners encounter substantial difficulty compared to native speakers. Native listeners of Tashlhiyt perform near ceiling level on all contrasts. French listeners perform better on final contrasts such as fit-fitt than initial contrasts such as bi-bbi or sir-ssir. That is, French listeners are more sensitive to silent closure duration in word-final voiceless stops than to either voiced murmur or frication duration of fully voiced stops or voiceless fricatives in word-initial position. We propose, tentatively, that native speakers of French, a language in which gemination is usually not considered to be phonemic, have not acquired quantity contrasts but yet exhibit a presumably universal sensitivity to rhythm, whereby listeners are able to perceive and compare the relative temporal distance between beats given by successive salient phonetic events such as a sequence of vowel nuclei.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="PubMed-not-MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">26973551</PMID><DateCreated><Year>2016</Year><Month>03</Month><Day>14</Day></DateCreated><DateCompleted><Year>2016</Year><Month>03</Month><Day>14</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2017</Year><Month>02</Month><Day>20</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Electronic-eCollection"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">1664-1078</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>7</Volume><PubDate><Year>2016</Year></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Frontiers in psychology</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Front Psychol</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Differential Difficulties in Perception of Tashlhiyt Berber Consonant Quantity Contrasts by Native Tashlhiyt Listeners vs. Berber-Naïve French Listeners.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>209</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00209</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>In a discrimination experiment on several Tashlhiyt Berber singleton-geminate contrasts, we find that French listeners encounter substantial difficulty compared to native speakers. Native listeners of Tashlhiyt perform near ceiling level on all contrasts. French listeners perform better on final contrasts such as fit-fitt than initial contrasts such as bi-bbi or sir-ssir. That is, French listeners are more sensitive to silent closure duration in word-final voiceless stops than to either voiced murmur or frication duration of fully voiced stops or voiceless fricatives in word-initial position. We propose, tentatively, that native speakers of French, a language in which gemination is usually not considered to be phonemic, have not acquired quantity contrasts but yet exhibit a presumably universal sensitivity to rhythm, whereby listeners are able to perceive and compare the relative temporal distance between beats given by successive salient phonetic events such as a sequence of vowel nuclei.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Hallé</LastName><ForeName>Pierre A</ForeName><Initials>PA</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Laboratoire Phonétique et Phonologie, Centre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueParis, France; Laboratoire Mémoire et Cognition, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche MédicaleParis, France; Haskins LaboratoriesNew Haven, CT, USA.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Ridouane</LastName><ForeName>Rachid</ForeName><Initials>R</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Laboratoire Phonétique et Phonologie, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Paris, France.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Best</LastName><ForeName>Catherine T</ForeName><Initials>CT</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Haskins LaboratoriesNew Haven, CT, USA; MARCS Institute and School of Humanities and Communication Arts, University of Western SydneySydney, NSW, Australia.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2016</Year><Month>03</Month><Day>01</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Switzerland</Country><MedlineTA>Front Psychol</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>101550902</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1664-1078</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CommentsCorrectionsList><CommentsCorrections RefType="ErratumIn"><RefSource>Front Psychol. 2016;7:479</RefSource><PMID Version="1">27065936</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Percept Psychophys. 1981 Apr;29(4):323-35</RefSource><PMID Version="1">7279555</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Percept Psychophys. 1997 Feb;59(2):243-51</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9055619</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Acoust Soc Am. 2004 Oct;116(4 Pt 1):2384-94</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15532669</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2003 Feb;35(1):116-24</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12723786</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Phonetica. 2014;71(1):4-21</RefSource><PMID Version="1">24923313</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Percept Psychophys. 1986 Mar;39(3):187-96</RefSource><PMID Version="1">3737344</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Science. 2000 Apr 14;288(5464):349-51</RefSource><PMID Version="1">10764650</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Lang Speech. 2005;48(Pt 3):313-38</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16416940</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Anim Cogn. 2003 Jun;6(2):131-6</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12728358</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Exp Psychol. 1973 Apr;98(1):14-24</RefSource><PMID Version="1">4704206</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Mem Cognit. 1998 Jul;26(4):844-51</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9701975</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016 Jan;78(1):334-45</RefSource><PMID Version="1">26392395</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Acoust Soc Am. 1972 Apr;51(4):1219-23</RefSource><PMID Version="1">5032936</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 May;121(5 Pt1):2899-914</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17550188</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Phon. 2010 Jan 1;38(1):109-126</RefSource><PMID Version="1">20228878</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Percept Psychophys. 1980 Apr;27(4):277-83</RefSource><PMID Version="1">7383811</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Percept Psychophys. 1988 Jan;43(1):90-3</RefSource><PMID Version="1">3340505</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Acoust Soc Am. 1987 Jul;82(1):88-105</RefSource><PMID Version="1">3624645</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Psychol Sci. 2010 Nov;21(11):1664-70</RefSource><PMID Version="1">20876883</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Percept Psychophys. 1979 May;25(5):375-88</RefSource><PMID Version="1">461098</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Cognition. 2008 Aug;108(2):512-21</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18400217</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1997 Jun;23(3):914-27</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9180050</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Brain Lang. 2001 Sep;78(3):332-48</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11703061</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Acoust Soc Am. 1999 Jan;105(1):512-21</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9921674</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Acoust Soc Am. 2001 Feb;109(2):775-94</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11248981</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008 Mar 12;363(1493):979-1000</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17846016</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1998 Jun;24(3):756-66</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9627414</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Phon. 2009 Jul;37(3):297-320</RefSource><PMID Version="1">20161112</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Percept Psychophys. 1991 Aug;50(2):93-107</RefSource><PMID Version="1">1945741</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Percept Psychophys. 1979 Jun;25(6):457-65</RefSource><PMID Version="1">492910</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Percept Psychophys. 1985 Nov;38(5):397-407</RefSource><PMID Version="1">3831918</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Percept Psychophys. 1988 Jan;43(1):99</RefSource><PMID Version="1">3340507</PMID></CommentsCorrections></CommentsCorrectionsList><OtherID Source="NLM">PMC4771936</OtherID><KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM"><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">French</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Tashlhiyt Berber</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">geminate obstruents</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">nonnative speech perception</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">timing perception</Keyword></KeywordList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2014</Year><Month>07</Month><Day>30</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2016</Year><Month>02</Month><Day>03</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2016</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>15</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2016</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>15</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2016</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>15</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>1</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>epublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">26973551</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00209</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC4771936</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Asie/explor/AustralieFrV1/Data/PubMed/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002080 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 002080 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Asie
|area= AustralieFrV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Curation
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:26973551
|texte= Differential Difficulties in Perception of Tashlhiyt Berber Consonant Quantity Contrasts by Native Tashlhiyt Listeners vs. Berber-Naïve French Listeners.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:26973551" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a AustralieFrV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |