Serveur d'exploration sur les relations entre la France et l'Australie

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Concatenation of 'alert' and 'identity' segments in dingoes' alarm calls.

Identifieur interne : 001C01 ( PubMed/Curation ); précédent : 001C00; suivant : 001C02

Concatenation of 'alert' and 'identity' segments in dingoes' alarm calls.

Auteurs : Eloïse C. Déaux [Australie] ; Andrew P. Allen [Australie] ; Jennifer A. Clarke [Australie] ; Isabelle Charrier [France]

Source :

RBID : pubmed:27460289

Abstract

Multicomponent signals can be formed by the uninterrupted concatenation of multiple call types. One such signal is found in dingoes, Canis familiaris dingo. This stereotyped, multicomponent 'bark-howl' vocalisation is formed by the concatenation of a noisy bark segment and a tonal howl segment. Both segments are structurally similar to bark and howl vocalisations produced independently in other contexts (e.g. intra- and inter-pack communication). Bark-howls are mainly uttered in response to human presence and were hypothesized to serve as alarm calls. We investigated the function of bark-howls and the respective roles of the bark and howl segments. We found that dingoes could discriminate between familiar and unfamiliar howl segments, after having only heard familiar howl vocalisations (i.e. different calls). We propose that howl segments could function as 'identity signals' and allow receivers to modulate their responses according to the caller's characteristics. The bark segment increased receivers' attention levels, providing support for earlier observational claims that barks have an 'alerting' function. Lastly, dingoes were more likely to display vigilance behaviours upon hearing bark-howl vocalisations, lending support to the alarm function hypothesis. Canid vocalisations, such as the dingo bark-howl, may provide a model system to investigate the selective pressures shaping complex communication systems.

DOI: 10.1038/srep30556
PubMed: 27460289

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Links to Exploration step

pubmed:27460289

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Concatenation of 'alert' and 'identity' segments in dingoes' alarm calls.</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Deaux, Eloise C" sort="Deaux, Eloise C" uniqKey="Deaux E" first="Eloïse C" last="Déaux">Eloïse C. Déaux</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, 2109, Australia.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Australie</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, 2109</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Allen, Andrew P" sort="Allen, Andrew P" uniqKey="Allen A" first="Andrew P" last="Allen">Andrew P. Allen</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, 2109, Australia.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Australie</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, 2109</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Clarke, Jennifer A" sort="Clarke, Jennifer A" uniqKey="Clarke J" first="Jennifer A" last="Clarke">Jennifer A. Clarke</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, 2109, Australia.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Australie</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, 2109</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Charrier, Isabelle" sort="Charrier, Isabelle" uniqKey="Charrier I" first="Isabelle" last="Charrier">Isabelle Charrier</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>Université Paris Saclay, Université Paris-Sud, CNRS, UMR 9197, Institut des Neurosciences Paris-Saclay, Orsay, 91405, France.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">France</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Université Paris Saclay, Université Paris-Sud, CNRS, UMR 9197, Institut des Neurosciences Paris-Saclay, Orsay, 91405</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2016">2016</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:27460289</idno>
<idno type="pmid">27460289</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.1038/srep30556</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">001C25</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">001C25</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">001C01</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">001C01</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en">Concatenation of 'alert' and 'identity' segments in dingoes' alarm calls.</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Deaux, Eloise C" sort="Deaux, Eloise C" uniqKey="Deaux E" first="Eloïse C" last="Déaux">Eloïse C. Déaux</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, 2109, Australia.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Australie</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, 2109</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Allen, Andrew P" sort="Allen, Andrew P" uniqKey="Allen A" first="Andrew P" last="Allen">Andrew P. Allen</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, 2109, Australia.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Australie</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, 2109</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Clarke, Jennifer A" sort="Clarke, Jennifer A" uniqKey="Clarke J" first="Jennifer A" last="Clarke">Jennifer A. Clarke</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, 2109, Australia.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Australie</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, 2109</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Charrier, Isabelle" sort="Charrier, Isabelle" uniqKey="Charrier I" first="Isabelle" last="Charrier">Isabelle Charrier</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>Université Paris Saclay, Université Paris-Sud, CNRS, UMR 9197, Institut des Neurosciences Paris-Saclay, Orsay, 91405, France.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">France</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Université Paris Saclay, Université Paris-Sud, CNRS, UMR 9197, Institut des Neurosciences Paris-Saclay, Orsay, 91405</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j">Scientific reports</title>
<idno type="eISSN">2045-2322</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2016" type="published">2016</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass></textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Multicomponent signals can be formed by the uninterrupted concatenation of multiple call types. One such signal is found in dingoes, Canis familiaris dingo. This stereotyped, multicomponent 'bark-howl' vocalisation is formed by the concatenation of a noisy bark segment and a tonal howl segment. Both segments are structurally similar to bark and howl vocalisations produced independently in other contexts (e.g. intra- and inter-pack communication). Bark-howls are mainly uttered in response to human presence and were hypothesized to serve as alarm calls. We investigated the function of bark-howls and the respective roles of the bark and howl segments. We found that dingoes could discriminate between familiar and unfamiliar howl segments, after having only heard familiar howl vocalisations (i.e. different calls). We propose that howl segments could function as 'identity signals' and allow receivers to modulate their responses according to the caller's characteristics. The bark segment increased receivers' attention levels, providing support for earlier observational claims that barks have an 'alerting' function. Lastly, dingoes were more likely to display vigilance behaviours upon hearing bark-howl vocalisations, lending support to the alarm function hypothesis. Canid vocalisations, such as the dingo bark-howl, may provide a model system to investigate the selective pressures shaping complex communication systems.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed>
<MedlineCitation Status="In-Data-Review" Owner="NLM">
<PMID Version="1">27460289</PMID>
<DateCreated>
<Year>2016</Year>
<Month>07</Month>
<Day>27</Day>
</DateCreated>
<DateRevised>
<Year>2017</Year>
<Month>02</Month>
<Day>20</Day>
</DateRevised>
<Article PubModel="Electronic">
<Journal>
<ISSN IssnType="Electronic">2045-2322</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet">
<Volume>6</Volume>
<PubDate>
<Year>2016</Year>
<Month>Jul</Month>
<Day>27</Day>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>Scientific reports</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>Sci Rep</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Concatenation of 'alert' and 'identity' segments in dingoes' alarm calls.</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination>
<MedlinePgn>30556</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1038/srep30556</ELocationID>
<Abstract>
<AbstractText>Multicomponent signals can be formed by the uninterrupted concatenation of multiple call types. One such signal is found in dingoes, Canis familiaris dingo. This stereotyped, multicomponent 'bark-howl' vocalisation is formed by the concatenation of a noisy bark segment and a tonal howl segment. Both segments are structurally similar to bark and howl vocalisations produced independently in other contexts (e.g. intra- and inter-pack communication). Bark-howls are mainly uttered in response to human presence and were hypothesized to serve as alarm calls. We investigated the function of bark-howls and the respective roles of the bark and howl segments. We found that dingoes could discriminate between familiar and unfamiliar howl segments, after having only heard familiar howl vocalisations (i.e. different calls). We propose that howl segments could function as 'identity signals' and allow receivers to modulate their responses according to the caller's characteristics. The bark segment increased receivers' attention levels, providing support for earlier observational claims that barks have an 'alerting' function. Lastly, dingoes were more likely to display vigilance behaviours upon hearing bark-howl vocalisations, lending support to the alarm function hypothesis. Canid vocalisations, such as the dingo bark-howl, may provide a model system to investigate the selective pressures shaping complex communication systems.</AbstractText>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y">
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Déaux</LastName>
<ForeName>Eloïse C</ForeName>
<Initials>EC</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo>
<Affiliation>Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, 2109, Australia.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Allen</LastName>
<ForeName>Andrew P</ForeName>
<Initials>AP</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo>
<Affiliation>Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, 2109, Australia.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Clarke</LastName>
<ForeName>Jennifer A</ForeName>
<Initials>JA</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo>
<Affiliation>Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, 2109, Australia.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Charrier</LastName>
<ForeName>Isabelle</ForeName>
<Initials>I</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo>
<Affiliation>Université Paris Saclay, Université Paris-Sud, CNRS, UMR 9197, Institut des Neurosciences Paris-Saclay, Orsay, 91405, France.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>eng</Language>
<PublicationTypeList>
<PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
<ArticleDate DateType="Electronic">
<Year>2016</Year>
<Month>07</Month>
<Day>27</Day>
</ArticleDate>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo>
<Country>England</Country>
<MedlineTA>Sci Rep</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>101563288</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>2045-2322</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
<CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset>
<CommentsCorrectionsList>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Evol Biol. 2010 Apr;23(4):661-9</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">20149018</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Science. 1971 Aug 13;173(3997):585-97</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">17833100</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Nature. 2006 May 18;441(7091):303</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">16710411</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Behav Processes. 2009 Oct;82(2):198-201</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">19596426</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Anim Cogn. 2012 Mar;15(2):265-70</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">21927848</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>BMC Biol. 2012 Dec 03;10:97</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">23206242</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Biom J. 2008 Jun;50(3):346-63</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">18481363</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Anim Behav. 1999 Nov;58(5):921-931</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">10564594</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Hum Biol. 2011 Apr;83(2):153-73</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">21615284</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Aug;122(2):823-30</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">17672633</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Behav Processes. 2016 Aug;129:94-100</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">27343622</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Trends Ecol Evol. 2007 Oct;22(10):529-37</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">17904686</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>PLoS Biol. 2005 Dec;3(12):e386</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">16248680</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Science. 1976 Apr 23;192(4237):378-80</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">1257772</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>PLoS One. 2009 Nov 12;4(11):e7808</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">19915663</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Behav Processes. 1976 Jul;1(1):77-92</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">24923546</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Science. 1999 Feb 26;283(5406):1272-3</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">10084931</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Dec 22;106(51):22026-31</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">20007377</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Behav Processes. 1976 Jul;1(1):57-75</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">24923545</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
</CommentsCorrectionsList>
<OtherID Source="NLM">PMC4962046</OtherID>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData>
<History>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received">
<Year>2016</Year>
<Month>02</Month>
<Day>26</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted">
<Year>2016</Year>
<Month>07</Month>
<Day>04</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez">
<Year>2016</Year>
<Month>7</Month>
<Day>28</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed">
<Year>2016</Year>
<Month>7</Month>
<Day>28</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline">
<Year>2016</Year>
<Month>7</Month>
<Day>28</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>epublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">27460289</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pii">srep30556</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1038/srep30556</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC4962046</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Asie/explor/AustralieFrV1/Data/PubMed/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001C01 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 001C01 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Asie
   |area=    AustralieFrV1
   |flux=    PubMed
   |étape=   Curation
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     pubmed:27460289
   |texte=   Concatenation of 'alert' and 'identity' segments in dingoes' alarm calls.
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:27460289" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a AustralieFrV1 

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33.
Data generation: Tue Dec 5 10:43:12 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 5 14:07:20 2024