Economic assessment of different mulches in conventional and water-saving rice production systems.
Identifieur interne : 001E88 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 001E87; suivant : 001E89Economic assessment of different mulches in conventional and water-saving rice production systems.
Auteurs : Khawar Jabran ; Mubshar Hussain ; Shah Fahad ; Muhammad Farooq ; Ali Ahsan Bajwa ; Hesham Alharrby ; Wajid NasimSource :
- Environmental science and pollution research international [ 1614-7499 ] ; 2016.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- chemical , economics : Fertilizers.
- economics : Agriculture.
- growth & development : Oryza.
- methods : Agriculture, Conservation of Natural Resources.
- supply & distribution : Water Resources.
- Environment, Plastics, Soil, Water.
Abstract
Water-saving rice production systems including alternate wetting and drying (AWD) and aerobic rice (AR) are being increasingly adopted by growers due to global water crises. Application of natural and artificial mulches may further improve water economy of water-saving rice production systems. Conventionally flooded rice (CFR) system has been rarely compared with AWD and AR in terms of economic returns. In this 2-year field study, we compared CFR with AWD and AR (with and without straw and plastic mulches) for the cost of production and economic benefits. Results indicated that CFR had a higher production cost than AWD and AR. However, application of mulches increased the cost of production of AWD and AR production systems where plastic mulch was expensive than straw mulch. Although the mulching increased the cost of production for AWD and AR, the gross income of these systems was also improved significantly. The gross income from mulched plots of AWD and AR was higher than non-mulched plots of the same systems. In conclusion, AWD and AR effectively reduce cost of production by economizing the water use. However, the use of natural and artificial mulches in such water-saving environments further increased the economic returns. The maximized economic returns by using straw mulch in water-saving rice production systems definitely have pragmatic implications for sustainable agriculture.
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-016-6162-y
PubMed: 26832873
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:26832873Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Economic assessment of different mulches in conventional and water-saving rice production systems.</title><author><name sortKey="Jabran, Khawar" sort="Jabran, Khawar" uniqKey="Jabran K" first="Khawar" last="Jabran">Khawar Jabran</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Agronomy, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Hussain, Mubshar" sort="Hussain, Mubshar" uniqKey="Hussain M" first="Mubshar" last="Hussain">Mubshar Hussain</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Agronomy, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Fahad, Shah" sort="Fahad, Shah" uniqKey="Fahad S" first="Shah" last="Fahad">Shah Fahad</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>College of Plant Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China. shah_fahad80@yahoo.com.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Farooq, Muhammad" sort="Farooq, Muhammad" uniqKey="Farooq M" first="Muhammad" last="Farooq">Muhammad Farooq</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Agronomy, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Bajwa, Ali Ahsan" sort="Bajwa, Ali Ahsan" uniqKey="Bajwa A" first="Ali Ahsan" last="Bajwa">Ali Ahsan Bajwa</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI), The University of Queensland, Toowoomba, 4350, QLD, Australia.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Alharrby, Hesham" sort="Alharrby, Hesham" uniqKey="Alharrby H" first="Hesham" last="Alharrby">Hesham Alharrby</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, 21589, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Nasim, Wajid" sort="Nasim, Wajid" uniqKey="Nasim W" first="Wajid" last="Nasim">Wajid Nasim</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Environmental Sciences, COMSATS Institute of Information Technology (CIIT), Vehari, 61100, Pakistan. wajidnseem2001@gmail.com.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2016">2016</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:26832873</idno><idno type="pmid">26832873</idno><idno type="doi">10.1007/s11356-016-6162-y</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">001E88</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">001E88</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Economic assessment of different mulches in conventional and water-saving rice production systems.</title><author><name sortKey="Jabran, Khawar" sort="Jabran, Khawar" uniqKey="Jabran K" first="Khawar" last="Jabran">Khawar Jabran</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Agronomy, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Hussain, Mubshar" sort="Hussain, Mubshar" uniqKey="Hussain M" first="Mubshar" last="Hussain">Mubshar Hussain</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Agronomy, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Fahad, Shah" sort="Fahad, Shah" uniqKey="Fahad S" first="Shah" last="Fahad">Shah Fahad</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>College of Plant Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China. shah_fahad80@yahoo.com.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Farooq, Muhammad" sort="Farooq, Muhammad" uniqKey="Farooq M" first="Muhammad" last="Farooq">Muhammad Farooq</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Agronomy, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Bajwa, Ali Ahsan" sort="Bajwa, Ali Ahsan" uniqKey="Bajwa A" first="Ali Ahsan" last="Bajwa">Ali Ahsan Bajwa</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI), The University of Queensland, Toowoomba, 4350, QLD, Australia.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Alharrby, Hesham" sort="Alharrby, Hesham" uniqKey="Alharrby H" first="Hesham" last="Alharrby">Hesham Alharrby</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, 21589, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Nasim, Wajid" sort="Nasim, Wajid" uniqKey="Nasim W" first="Wajid" last="Nasim">Wajid Nasim</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Environmental Sciences, COMSATS Institute of Information Technology (CIIT), Vehari, 61100, Pakistan. wajidnseem2001@gmail.com.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Environmental science and pollution research international</title><idno type="eISSN">1614-7499</idno><imprint><date when="2016" type="published">2016</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Agriculture (economics)</term><term>Agriculture (methods)</term><term>Conservation of Natural Resources (methods)</term><term>Environment</term><term>Fertilizers (economics)</term><term>Oryza (growth & development)</term><term>Plastics</term><term>Soil</term><term>Water</term><term>Water Resources (supply & distribution)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="economics" xml:lang="en"><term>Fertilizers</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="economics" xml:lang="en"><term>Agriculture</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="growth & development" xml:lang="en"><term>Oryza</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Agriculture</term><term>Conservation of Natural Resources</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="supply & distribution" xml:lang="en"><term>Water Resources</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Environment</term><term>Plastics</term><term>Soil</term><term>Water</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Water-saving rice production systems including alternate wetting and drying (AWD) and aerobic rice (AR) are being increasingly adopted by growers due to global water crises. Application of natural and artificial mulches may further improve water economy of water-saving rice production systems. Conventionally flooded rice (CFR) system has been rarely compared with AWD and AR in terms of economic returns. In this 2-year field study, we compared CFR with AWD and AR (with and without straw and plastic mulches) for the cost of production and economic benefits. Results indicated that CFR had a higher production cost than AWD and AR. However, application of mulches increased the cost of production of AWD and AR production systems where plastic mulch was expensive than straw mulch. Although the mulching increased the cost of production for AWD and AR, the gross income of these systems was also improved significantly. The gross income from mulched plots of AWD and AR was higher than non-mulched plots of the same systems. In conclusion, AWD and AR effectively reduce cost of production by economizing the water use. However, the use of natural and artificial mulches in such water-saving environments further increased the economic returns. The maximized economic returns by using straw mulch in water-saving rice production systems definitely have pragmatic implications for sustainable agriculture.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">26832873</PMID><DateCreated><Year>2016</Year><Month>04</Month><Day>29</Day></DateCreated><DateCompleted><Year>2017</Year><Month>04</Month><Day>04</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2017</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>16</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1614-7499</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>23</Volume><Issue>9</Issue><PubDate><Year>2016</Year><Month>May</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Environmental science and pollution research international</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Environ Sci Pollut Res Int</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Economic assessment of different mulches in conventional and water-saving rice production systems.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>9156-63</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1007/s11356-016-6162-y</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>Water-saving rice production systems including alternate wetting and drying (AWD) and aerobic rice (AR) are being increasingly adopted by growers due to global water crises. Application of natural and artificial mulches may further improve water economy of water-saving rice production systems. Conventionally flooded rice (CFR) system has been rarely compared with AWD and AR in terms of economic returns. In this 2-year field study, we compared CFR with AWD and AR (with and without straw and plastic mulches) for the cost of production and economic benefits. Results indicated that CFR had a higher production cost than AWD and AR. However, application of mulches increased the cost of production of AWD and AR production systems where plastic mulch was expensive than straw mulch. Although the mulching increased the cost of production for AWD and AR, the gross income of these systems was also improved significantly. The gross income from mulched plots of AWD and AR was higher than non-mulched plots of the same systems. In conclusion, AWD and AR effectively reduce cost of production by economizing the water use. However, the use of natural and artificial mulches in such water-saving environments further increased the economic returns. The maximized economic returns by using straw mulch in water-saving rice production systems definitely have pragmatic implications for sustainable agriculture.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Jabran</LastName><ForeName>Khawar</ForeName><Initials>K</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Agronomy, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Plant Protection, Adnan Menderes University Aydin, Aydın, Turkey.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Hussain</LastName><ForeName>Mubshar</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Agronomy, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Fahad</LastName><ForeName>Shah</ForeName><Initials>S</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>College of Plant Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China. shah_fahad80@yahoo.com.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Farooq</LastName><ForeName>Muhammad</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Agronomy, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Bajwa</LastName><ForeName>Ali Ahsan</ForeName><Initials>AA</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI), The University of Queensland, Toowoomba, 4350, QLD, Australia.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Alharrby</LastName><ForeName>Hesham</ForeName><Initials>H</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, 21589, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Nasim</LastName><ForeName>Wajid</ForeName><Initials>W</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Environmental Sciences, COMSATS Institute of Information Technology (CIIT), Vehari, 61100, Pakistan. wajidnseem2001@gmail.com.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>CIHEAM-Institut Agronomique Méditerranéen de Montpellier (IAMM), 3191 route de Mende, 34090, Montpellier, France. wajidnseem2001@gmail.com.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>CSIRO Sustainable Agriculture, National Research Flagship, Toowoomba, Qld, 4350, Australia. wajidnseem2001@gmail.com.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2016</Year><Month>02</Month><Day>01</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Germany</Country><MedlineTA>Environ Sci Pollut Res Int</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>9441769</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0944-1344</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D005308">Fertilizers</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D010969">Plastics</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D012987">Soil</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>059QF0KO0R</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D014867">Water</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><CommentsCorrectionsList><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Food Microbiol. 2002 Nov 15;79(1-2):131-41</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12382693</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Chemosphere. 2005 Jun;59(11):1547-56</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15894043</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Plant Physiol Biochem. 2015 Nov;96:281-7</RefSource><PMID Version="1">26318145</PMID></CommentsCorrections></CommentsCorrectionsList><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000383" MajorTopicYN="N">Agriculture</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000191" MajorTopicYN="N">economics</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003247" MajorTopicYN="N">Conservation of Natural Resources</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="N">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D004777" MajorTopicYN="N">Environment</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005308" MajorTopicYN="N">Fertilizers</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000191" MajorTopicYN="Y">economics</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012275" MajorTopicYN="N">Oryza</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000254" MajorTopicYN="Y">growth & development</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010969" MajorTopicYN="N">Plastics</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012987" MajorTopicYN="N">Soil</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014867" MajorTopicYN="N">Water</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D062066" MajorTopicYN="N">Water Resources</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000600" MajorTopicYN="Y">supply & distribution</QualifierName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList><KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM"><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Cost of production</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Economic analysis</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Fixed cost</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Mulch systems</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Rice</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Rice systems</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Water-saving techniques</Keyword></KeywordList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2015</Year><Month>09</Month><Day>28</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2016</Year><Month>01</Month><Day>21</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2016</Year><Month>2</Month><Day>3</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2016</Year><Month>2</Month><Day>3</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2017</Year><Month>4</Month><Day>5</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">26832873</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1007/s11356-016-6162-y</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">10.1007/s11356-016-6162-y</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Asie/explor/AustralieFrV1/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001E88 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001E88 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Asie
|area= AustralieFrV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:26832873
|texte= Economic assessment of different mulches in conventional and water-saving rice production systems.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:26832873" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a AustralieFrV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |