Information preferences for the evaluation of coastal development impacts on ecosystem services: A multi-criteria assessment in the Australian context.
Identifieur interne : 001E85 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 001E84; suivant : 001E86Information preferences for the evaluation of coastal development impacts on ecosystem services: A multi-criteria assessment in the Australian context.
Auteurs : Jean-Baptiste Marre ; Sean Pascoe ; Olivier Thébaud ; Sarah Jennings ; Jean Boncoeur ; Louisa CoglanSource :
- Journal of environmental management [ 1095-8630 ] ; 2016.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- economics : Conservation of Natural Resources.
- methods : Conservation of Natural Resources.
- Australia, Biodiversity, Decision Making, Ecology, Ecosystem, Public Policy, Socioeconomic Factors.
Abstract
Ecosystem based management requires the integration of various types of assessment indicators. Understanding stakeholders' information preferences is important, in selecting those indicators that best support management and policy. Both the preferences of decision-makers and the general public may matter, in democratic participatory management institutions. This paper presents a multi-criteria analysis aimed at quantifying the relative importance to these groups of economic, ecological and socio-economic indicators usually considered when managing ecosystem services in a coastal development context. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is applied within two nationwide surveys in Australia, and preferences of both the general public and decision-makers for these indicators are elicited and compared. Results show that, on average across both groups, the priority in assessing a generic coastal development project is for the ecological assessment of its impacts on marine biodiversity. Ecological assessment indicators are globally preferred to both economic and socio-economic indicators regardless of the nature of the impacts studied. These results are observed for a significantly larger proportion of decision-maker than general public respondents, questioning the extent to which the general public's preferences are well reflected in decision-making processes.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.01.025
PubMed: 26861223
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:26861223Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Information preferences for the evaluation of coastal development impacts on ecosystem services: A multi-criteria assessment in the Australian context.</title><author><name sortKey="Marre, Jean Baptiste" sort="Marre, Jean Baptiste" uniqKey="Marre J" first="Jean-Baptiste" last="Marre">Jean-Baptiste Marre</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Université de Bretagne Occidentale, UMR AMURE, Brest, France; CSIRO Wealth from Oceans Flagship, Marine and Atmospheric Research, Brisbane, Australia; School of Economics and Finance, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia. Electronic address: jean-baptistem@spc.int.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Pascoe, Sean" sort="Pascoe, Sean" uniqKey="Pascoe S" first="Sean" last="Pascoe">Sean Pascoe</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>CSIRO Wealth from Oceans Flagship, Marine and Atmospheric Research, Brisbane, Australia.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Thebaud, Olivier" sort="Thebaud, Olivier" uniqKey="Thebaud O" first="Olivier" last="Thébaud">Olivier Thébaud</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Ifremer, UMR M101, AMURE, Unité d'Économie Maritime, Brest, France; School of Economics and Finance, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Jennings, Sarah" sort="Jennings, Sarah" uniqKey="Jennings S" first="Sarah" last="Jennings">Sarah Jennings</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Tasmanian School of Business and Economics, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Boncoeur, Jean" sort="Boncoeur, Jean" uniqKey="Boncoeur J" first="Jean" last="Boncoeur">Jean Boncoeur</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Université de Bretagne Occidentale, UMR AMURE, Brest, France.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Coglan, Louisa" sort="Coglan, Louisa" uniqKey="Coglan L" first="Louisa" last="Coglan">Louisa Coglan</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>School of Economics and Finance, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2016">2016</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:26861223</idno><idno type="pmid">26861223</idno><idno type="doi">10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.01.025</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">001E85</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">001E85</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Information preferences for the evaluation of coastal development impacts on ecosystem services: A multi-criteria assessment in the Australian context.</title><author><name sortKey="Marre, Jean Baptiste" sort="Marre, Jean Baptiste" uniqKey="Marre J" first="Jean-Baptiste" last="Marre">Jean-Baptiste Marre</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Université de Bretagne Occidentale, UMR AMURE, Brest, France; CSIRO Wealth from Oceans Flagship, Marine and Atmospheric Research, Brisbane, Australia; School of Economics and Finance, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia. Electronic address: jean-baptistem@spc.int.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Pascoe, Sean" sort="Pascoe, Sean" uniqKey="Pascoe S" first="Sean" last="Pascoe">Sean Pascoe</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>CSIRO Wealth from Oceans Flagship, Marine and Atmospheric Research, Brisbane, Australia.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Thebaud, Olivier" sort="Thebaud, Olivier" uniqKey="Thebaud O" first="Olivier" last="Thébaud">Olivier Thébaud</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Ifremer, UMR M101, AMURE, Unité d'Économie Maritime, Brest, France; School of Economics and Finance, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Jennings, Sarah" sort="Jennings, Sarah" uniqKey="Jennings S" first="Sarah" last="Jennings">Sarah Jennings</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Tasmanian School of Business and Economics, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Boncoeur, Jean" sort="Boncoeur, Jean" uniqKey="Boncoeur J" first="Jean" last="Boncoeur">Jean Boncoeur</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Université de Bretagne Occidentale, UMR AMURE, Brest, France.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Coglan, Louisa" sort="Coglan, Louisa" uniqKey="Coglan L" first="Louisa" last="Coglan">Louisa Coglan</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>School of Economics and Finance, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Journal of environmental management</title><idno type="eISSN">1095-8630</idno><imprint><date when="2016" type="published">2016</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Australia</term><term>Biodiversity</term><term>Conservation of Natural Resources (economics)</term><term>Conservation of Natural Resources (methods)</term><term>Decision Making</term><term>Ecology</term><term>Ecosystem</term><term>Public Policy</term><term>Socioeconomic Factors</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="economics" xml:lang="en"><term>Conservation of Natural Resources</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Conservation of Natural Resources</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Australia</term><term>Biodiversity</term><term>Decision Making</term><term>Ecology</term><term>Ecosystem</term><term>Public Policy</term><term>Socioeconomic Factors</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Ecosystem based management requires the integration of various types of assessment indicators. Understanding stakeholders' information preferences is important, in selecting those indicators that best support management and policy. Both the preferences of decision-makers and the general public may matter, in democratic participatory management institutions. This paper presents a multi-criteria analysis aimed at quantifying the relative importance to these groups of economic, ecological and socio-economic indicators usually considered when managing ecosystem services in a coastal development context. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is applied within two nationwide surveys in Australia, and preferences of both the general public and decision-makers for these indicators are elicited and compared. Results show that, on average across both groups, the priority in assessing a generic coastal development project is for the ecological assessment of its impacts on marine biodiversity. Ecological assessment indicators are globally preferred to both economic and socio-economic indicators regardless of the nature of the impacts studied. These results are observed for a significantly larger proportion of decision-maker than general public respondents, questioning the extent to which the general public's preferences are well reflected in decision-making processes.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">26861223</PMID><DateCreated><Year>2016</Year><Month>04</Month><Day>02</Day></DateCreated><DateCompleted><Year>2016</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>13</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2016</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>30</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1095-8630</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>173</Volume><PubDate><Year>2016</Year><Month>May</Month><Day>15</Day></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Journal of environmental management</Title><ISOAbbreviation>J. Environ. Manage.</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Information preferences for the evaluation of coastal development impacts on ecosystem services: A multi-criteria assessment in the Australian context.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>141-50</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.01.025</ELocationID><ELocationID EIdType="pii" ValidYN="Y">S0301-4797(16)30023-8</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>Ecosystem based management requires the integration of various types of assessment indicators. Understanding stakeholders' information preferences is important, in selecting those indicators that best support management and policy. Both the preferences of decision-makers and the general public may matter, in democratic participatory management institutions. This paper presents a multi-criteria analysis aimed at quantifying the relative importance to these groups of economic, ecological and socio-economic indicators usually considered when managing ecosystem services in a coastal development context. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is applied within two nationwide surveys in Australia, and preferences of both the general public and decision-makers for these indicators are elicited and compared. Results show that, on average across both groups, the priority in assessing a generic coastal development project is for the ecological assessment of its impacts on marine biodiversity. Ecological assessment indicators are globally preferred to both economic and socio-economic indicators regardless of the nature of the impacts studied. These results are observed for a significantly larger proportion of decision-maker than general public respondents, questioning the extent to which the general public's preferences are well reflected in decision-making processes.</AbstractText><CopyrightInformation>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</CopyrightInformation></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Marre</LastName><ForeName>Jean-Baptiste</ForeName><Initials>JB</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Université de Bretagne Occidentale, UMR AMURE, Brest, France; CSIRO Wealth from Oceans Flagship, Marine and Atmospheric Research, Brisbane, Australia; School of Economics and Finance, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia. Electronic address: jean-baptistem@spc.int.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Pascoe</LastName><ForeName>Sean</ForeName><Initials>S</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>CSIRO Wealth from Oceans Flagship, Marine and Atmospheric Research, Brisbane, Australia.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Thébaud</LastName><ForeName>Olivier</ForeName><Initials>O</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Ifremer, UMR M101, AMURE, Unité d'Économie Maritime, Brest, France; School of Economics and Finance, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Jennings</LastName><ForeName>Sarah</ForeName><Initials>S</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Tasmanian School of Business and Economics, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Boncoeur</LastName><ForeName>Jean</ForeName><Initials>J</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Université de Bretagne Occidentale, UMR AMURE, Brest, France.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Coglan</LastName><ForeName>Louisa</ForeName><Initials>L</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>School of Economics and Finance, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2016</Year><Month>02</Month><Day>06</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>England</Country><MedlineTA>J Environ Manage</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>0401664</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0301-4797</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D001315" MajorTopicYN="N">Australia</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D044822" MajorTopicYN="N">Biodiversity</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003247" MajorTopicYN="N">Conservation of Natural Resources</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000191" MajorTopicYN="Y">economics</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003657" MajorTopicYN="N">Decision Making</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D004463" MajorTopicYN="N">Ecology</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017753" MajorTopicYN="Y">Ecosystem</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011640" MajorTopicYN="Y">Public Policy</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012959" MajorTopicYN="N">Socioeconomic Factors</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList><KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM"><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Analytic hierarchy process</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Australia</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Coastal development</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Ecosystem services assessment</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Information preferences</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Multi-criteria analysis</Keyword></KeywordList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2015</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>06</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="revised"><Year>2015</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>21</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2016</Year><Month>01</Month><Day>21</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2016</Year><Month>2</Month><Day>11</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2016</Year><Month>2</Month><Day>11</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2016</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>15</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">26861223</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">S0301-4797(16)30023-8</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.01.025</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Asie/explor/AustralieFrV1/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001E85 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001E85 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Asie
|area= AustralieFrV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:26861223
|texte= Information preferences for the evaluation of coastal development impacts on ecosystem services: A multi-criteria assessment in the Australian context.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:26861223" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a AustralieFrV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |