COMPARISON OF THORACIC ULTRASONOGRAPHY AND RADIOGRAPHY FOR THE DETECTION OF INDUCED SMALL VOLUME PNEUMOTHORAX IN THE HORSE.
Identifieur interne : 000D18 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 000D17; suivant : 000D19COMPARISON OF THORACIC ULTRASONOGRAPHY AND RADIOGRAPHY FOR THE DETECTION OF INDUCED SMALL VOLUME PNEUMOTHORAX IN THE HORSE.
Auteurs : Jessica Partlow ; Florent David ; Luanne Michelle Hunt ; Fabien Relave ; Laurent Blond ; Manuel Pinilla ; Jean-Pierre LavoieSource :
- Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association [ 1740-8261 ] ; 2017.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Animals, Female, Horse Diseases (diagnostic imaging), Horse Diseases (etiology), Horses, Male, Pneumothorax (diagnostic imaging), Pneumothorax (etiology), Pneumothorax (veterinary), Radiography, Thoracic (methods), Radiography, Thoracic (veterinary), Sensitivity and Specificity, Ultrasonography (methods), Ultrasonography (veterinary).
- MESH :
- diagnostic imaging : Horse Diseases, Pneumothorax.
- etiology : Horse Diseases, Pneumothorax.
- methods : Radiography, Thoracic, Ultrasonography.
- veterinary : Pneumothorax, Radiography, Thoracic, Ultrasonography.
- Animals, Female, Horses, Male, Sensitivity and Specificity.
Abstract
Small volume pneumothorax can be challenging to diagnose in horses. The current standard method for diagnosis is standing thoracic radiography. We hypothesized that thoracic ultrasonography would be more sensitive. Objectives of this prospective, experimental study were to describe a thoracic ultrasound method for detection of small volume pneumothorax in horses and to compare results of radiography and ultrasound in a sample of horses with induced small volume pneumothorax. Six mature healthy horses were recruited for this study. For each horse, five 50 ml air boluses were sequentially introduced via a teat cannula into the pleural space. Lateral thoracic radiographs and standardized ultrasound (2D and M-mode) examinations of both hemithoraces were performed following administration of each 50 ml air bolus. Radiographs and ultrasound images/videos were analyzed for detection of pneumothorax by four independent investigators who were unaware of treatment status. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values, negative predictive values, and agreement among investigators (Kappa test, κ) were calculated for radiography, 2D and M-mode ultrasound. Comparisons were made using a chi-squared exact test with significance set at P < 0.05. Two-dimensional (84%) and M-mode (80%) ultrasound were more sensitive than radiography (48%) for pneumothorax detection (P = 0.02 and P = 0.04, respectively). Specificity and positive predictive values were similar for all three imaging modalities (P = 1). Agreement between investigators for pneumothorax detection was excellent for 2D ultrasound (κ = 1), very good for M-mode ultrasound (κ = 0.87), and good for radiography (κ = 0.79). Findings from this experimental study supported the use of thoracic ultrasonography as a diagnostic method for detecting pneumothorax in horses.
DOI: 10.1111/vru.12480
PubMed: 28264227
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:28264227Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">COMPARISON OF THORACIC ULTRASONOGRAPHY AND RADIOGRAPHY FOR THE DETECTION OF INDUCED SMALL VOLUME PNEUMOTHORAX IN THE HORSE.</title><author><name sortKey="Partlow, Jessica" sort="Partlow, Jessica" uniqKey="Partlow J" first="Jessica" last="Partlow">Jessica Partlow</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Scone Equine Hospital, Scone, NSW, 2337, Australia.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="David, Florent" sort="David, Florent" uniqKey="David F" first="Florent" last="David">Florent David</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Bjerke Dyrehospital- En Rikstotoklinikk, Refstadveien 1, Oslo, 0589, Norway.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Hunt, Luanne Michelle" sort="Hunt, Luanne Michelle" uniqKey="Hunt L" first="Luanne Michelle" last="Hunt">Luanne Michelle Hunt</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>The Roslin Institute, Royal (Dick), School of Veterinary Studies, Easter Bush Campus, Midlothian, Edinburgh EH25 9RG, Scotland, United Kingdom.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Relave, Fabien" sort="Relave, Fabien" uniqKey="Relave F" first="Fabien" last="Relave">Fabien Relave</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Clinique Équine de Conques, Château de Conques , 33420, Saint Aubin De Branne, France.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Blond, Laurent" sort="Blond, Laurent" uniqKey="Blond L" first="Laurent" last="Blond">Laurent Blond</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Clinique Vétérinaire Langedocia, 395 rue Maurice Béjart, 34080, Montpellier, France.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Pinilla, Manuel" sort="Pinilla, Manuel" uniqKey="Pinilla M" first="Manuel" last="Pinilla">Manuel Pinilla</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>VetCT, St. John's Innovation Centre, Cowley Road, Cambridge, CB4 0WS, United Kingdom.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lavoie, Jean Pierre" sort="Lavoie, Jean Pierre" uniqKey="Lavoie J" first="Jean-Pierre" last="Lavoie">Jean-Pierre Lavoie</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Université de Montréal, Faculté de Médecine Vétérinaire, Département de Sciences Cliniques, 3200 rue Sicotte, Saint-Hyacinthe, Québec, J2S 7C6, Canada.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2017">2017</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:28264227</idno><idno type="pmid">28264227</idno><idno type="doi">10.1111/vru.12480</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000D18</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000D18</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">COMPARISON OF THORACIC ULTRASONOGRAPHY AND RADIOGRAPHY FOR THE DETECTION OF INDUCED SMALL VOLUME PNEUMOTHORAX IN THE HORSE.</title><author><name sortKey="Partlow, Jessica" sort="Partlow, Jessica" uniqKey="Partlow J" first="Jessica" last="Partlow">Jessica Partlow</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Scone Equine Hospital, Scone, NSW, 2337, Australia.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="David, Florent" sort="David, Florent" uniqKey="David F" first="Florent" last="David">Florent David</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Bjerke Dyrehospital- En Rikstotoklinikk, Refstadveien 1, Oslo, 0589, Norway.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Hunt, Luanne Michelle" sort="Hunt, Luanne Michelle" uniqKey="Hunt L" first="Luanne Michelle" last="Hunt">Luanne Michelle Hunt</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>The Roslin Institute, Royal (Dick), School of Veterinary Studies, Easter Bush Campus, Midlothian, Edinburgh EH25 9RG, Scotland, United Kingdom.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Relave, Fabien" sort="Relave, Fabien" uniqKey="Relave F" first="Fabien" last="Relave">Fabien Relave</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Clinique Équine de Conques, Château de Conques , 33420, Saint Aubin De Branne, France.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Blond, Laurent" sort="Blond, Laurent" uniqKey="Blond L" first="Laurent" last="Blond">Laurent Blond</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Clinique Vétérinaire Langedocia, 395 rue Maurice Béjart, 34080, Montpellier, France.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Pinilla, Manuel" sort="Pinilla, Manuel" uniqKey="Pinilla M" first="Manuel" last="Pinilla">Manuel Pinilla</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>VetCT, St. John's Innovation Centre, Cowley Road, Cambridge, CB4 0WS, United Kingdom.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lavoie, Jean Pierre" sort="Lavoie, Jean Pierre" uniqKey="Lavoie J" first="Jean-Pierre" last="Lavoie">Jean-Pierre Lavoie</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Université de Montréal, Faculté de Médecine Vétérinaire, Département de Sciences Cliniques, 3200 rue Sicotte, Saint-Hyacinthe, Québec, J2S 7C6, Canada.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association</title><idno type="eISSN">1740-8261</idno><imprint><date when="2017" type="published">2017</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Animals</term><term>Female</term><term>Horse Diseases (diagnostic imaging)</term><term>Horse Diseases (etiology)</term><term>Horses</term><term>Male</term><term>Pneumothorax (diagnostic imaging)</term><term>Pneumothorax (etiology)</term><term>Pneumothorax (veterinary)</term><term>Radiography, Thoracic (methods)</term><term>Radiography, Thoracic (veterinary)</term><term>Sensitivity and Specificity</term><term>Ultrasonography (methods)</term><term>Ultrasonography (veterinary)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="diagnostic imaging" xml:lang="en"><term>Horse Diseases</term><term>Pneumothorax</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="etiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Horse Diseases</term><term>Pneumothorax</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Radiography, Thoracic</term><term>Ultrasonography</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="veterinary" xml:lang="en"><term>Pneumothorax</term><term>Radiography, Thoracic</term><term>Ultrasonography</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Animals</term><term>Female</term><term>Horses</term><term>Male</term><term>Sensitivity and Specificity</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Small volume pneumothorax can be challenging to diagnose in horses. The current standard method for diagnosis is standing thoracic radiography. We hypothesized that thoracic ultrasonography would be more sensitive. Objectives of this prospective, experimental study were to describe a thoracic ultrasound method for detection of small volume pneumothorax in horses and to compare results of radiography and ultrasound in a sample of horses with induced small volume pneumothorax. Six mature healthy horses were recruited for this study. For each horse, five 50 ml air boluses were sequentially introduced via a teat cannula into the pleural space. Lateral thoracic radiographs and standardized ultrasound (2D and M-mode) examinations of both hemithoraces were performed following administration of each 50 ml air bolus. Radiographs and ultrasound images/videos were analyzed for detection of pneumothorax by four independent investigators who were unaware of treatment status. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values, negative predictive values, and agreement among investigators (Kappa test, κ) were calculated for radiography, 2D and M-mode ultrasound. Comparisons were made using a chi-squared exact test with significance set at P < 0.05. Two-dimensional (84%) and M-mode (80%) ultrasound were more sensitive than radiography (48%) for pneumothorax detection (P = 0.02 and P = 0.04, respectively). Specificity and positive predictive values were similar for all three imaging modalities (P = 1). Agreement between investigators for pneumothorax detection was excellent for 2D ultrasound (κ = 1), very good for M-mode ultrasound (κ = 0.87), and good for radiography (κ = 0.79). Findings from this experimental study supported the use of thoracic ultrasonography as a diagnostic method for detecting pneumothorax in horses.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">28264227</PMID><DateCreated><Year>2017</Year><Month>03</Month><Day>06</Day></DateCreated><DateCompleted><Year>2017</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>27</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2017</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>27</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1740-8261</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>58</Volume><Issue>3</Issue><PubDate><Year>2017</Year><Month>May</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Vet Radiol Ultrasound</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>COMPARISON OF THORACIC ULTRASONOGRAPHY AND RADIOGRAPHY FOR THE DETECTION OF INDUCED SMALL VOLUME PNEUMOTHORAX IN THE HORSE.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>354-360</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1111/vru.12480</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>Small volume pneumothorax can be challenging to diagnose in horses. The current standard method for diagnosis is standing thoracic radiography. We hypothesized that thoracic ultrasonography would be more sensitive. Objectives of this prospective, experimental study were to describe a thoracic ultrasound method for detection of small volume pneumothorax in horses and to compare results of radiography and ultrasound in a sample of horses with induced small volume pneumothorax. Six mature healthy horses were recruited for this study. For each horse, five 50 ml air boluses were sequentially introduced via a teat cannula into the pleural space. Lateral thoracic radiographs and standardized ultrasound (2D and M-mode) examinations of both hemithoraces were performed following administration of each 50 ml air bolus. Radiographs and ultrasound images/videos were analyzed for detection of pneumothorax by four independent investigators who were unaware of treatment status. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values, negative predictive values, and agreement among investigators (Kappa test, κ) were calculated for radiography, 2D and M-mode ultrasound. Comparisons were made using a chi-squared exact test with significance set at P < 0.05. Two-dimensional (84%) and M-mode (80%) ultrasound were more sensitive than radiography (48%) for pneumothorax detection (P = 0.02 and P = 0.04, respectively). Specificity and positive predictive values were similar for all three imaging modalities (P = 1). Agreement between investigators for pneumothorax detection was excellent for 2D ultrasound (κ = 1), very good for M-mode ultrasound (κ = 0.87), and good for radiography (κ = 0.79). Findings from this experimental study supported the use of thoracic ultrasonography as a diagnostic method for detecting pneumothorax in horses.</AbstractText><CopyrightInformation>© 2017 American College of Veterinary Radiology.</CopyrightInformation></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Partlow</LastName><ForeName>Jessica</ForeName><Initials>J</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Scone Equine Hospital, Scone, NSW, 2337, Australia.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>David</LastName><ForeName>Florent</ForeName><Initials>F</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Bjerke Dyrehospital- En Rikstotoklinikk, Refstadveien 1, Oslo, 0589, Norway.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Hunt</LastName><ForeName>Luanne Michelle</ForeName><Initials>LM</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>The Roslin Institute, Royal (Dick), School of Veterinary Studies, Easter Bush Campus, Midlothian, Edinburgh EH25 9RG, Scotland, United Kingdom.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Relave</LastName><ForeName>Fabien</ForeName><Initials>F</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Clinique Équine de Conques, Château de Conques , 33420, Saint Aubin De Branne, France.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Blond</LastName><ForeName>Laurent</ForeName><Initials>L</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Clinique Vétérinaire Langedocia, 395 rue Maurice Béjart, 34080, Montpellier, France.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Pinilla</LastName><ForeName>Manuel</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>VetCT, St. John's Innovation Centre, Cowley Road, Cambridge, CB4 0WS, United Kingdom.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Lavoie</LastName><ForeName>Jean-Pierre</ForeName><Initials>JP</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Université de Montréal, Faculté de Médecine Vétérinaire, Département de Sciences Cliniques, 3200 rue Sicotte, Saint-Hyacinthe, Québec, J2S 7C6, Canada.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2017</Year><Month>03</Month><Day>06</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>England</Country><MedlineTA>Vet Radiol Ultrasound</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>9209635</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1058-8183</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000818" MajorTopicYN="N">Animals</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006734" MajorTopicYN="N">Horse Diseases</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000000981" MajorTopicYN="Y">diagnostic imaging</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000209" MajorTopicYN="N">etiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006736" MajorTopicYN="N">Horses</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011030" MajorTopicYN="N">Pneumothorax</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000000981" MajorTopicYN="N">diagnostic imaging</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000209" MajorTopicYN="N">etiology</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000662" MajorTopicYN="Y">veterinary</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013902" MajorTopicYN="N">Radiography, Thoracic</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="N">methods</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000662" MajorTopicYN="Y">veterinary</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012680" MajorTopicYN="N">Sensitivity and Specificity</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014463" MajorTopicYN="N">Ultrasonography</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="N">methods</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000662" MajorTopicYN="Y">veterinary</QualifierName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList><KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM"><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">equine</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">horse</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">pneumothorax</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">radiography</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">thorax</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">ultrasound</Keyword></KeywordList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2016</Year><Month>03</Month><Day>31</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="revised"><Year>2017</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>29</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2016</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>06</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2017</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>7</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2017</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>28</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2017</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>7</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28264227</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1111/vru.12480</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Asie/explor/AustralieFrV1/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000D18 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000D18 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Asie
|area= AustralieFrV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:28264227
|texte= COMPARISON OF THORACIC ULTRASONOGRAPHY AND RADIOGRAPHY FOR THE DETECTION OF INDUCED SMALL VOLUME PNEUMOTHORAX IN THE HORSE.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:28264227" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a AustralieFrV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |