Links to Exploration step
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Peer assessment of journal quality in clinical neurology</title><author><name sortKey="Yue, Weiping" sort="Yue, Weiping" uniqKey="Yue W" first="Weiping" last="Yue">Weiping Yue</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="aff1"><email>weipingyue@gmail.com</email>, Research Associate</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Wilson, Concepci N S" sort="Wilson, Concepci N S" uniqKey="Wilson C" first="Concepci N S." last="Wilson">Concepci N S. Wilson</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="aff2"><email>c.wilson@unsw.edu.au</email>, Associate Professor, School of Information Systems, Technology and Management, University of New South Wales, Sydney NSW 2052, Australia</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Boller, Francois" sort="Boller, Francois" uniqKey="Boller F" first="Francois" last="Boller">Francois Boller</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="aff3">fboller@broca.inserm.fr, INSERM Unit 549, Paris, France</nlm:aff></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno><idno type="pmid">17252069</idno><idno type="pmc">1773051</idno><idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1773051</idno><idno type="RBID">PMC:1773051</idno><date when="2007">2007</date><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">001023</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PMC">001023</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a" type="main">Peer assessment of journal quality in clinical neurology</title><author><name sortKey="Yue, Weiping" sort="Yue, Weiping" uniqKey="Yue W" first="Weiping" last="Yue">Weiping Yue</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="aff1"><email>weipingyue@gmail.com</email>, Research Associate</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Wilson, Concepci N S" sort="Wilson, Concepci N S" uniqKey="Wilson C" first="Concepci N S." last="Wilson">Concepci N S. Wilson</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="aff2"><email>c.wilson@unsw.edu.au</email>, Associate Professor, School of Information Systems, Technology and Management, University of New South Wales, Sydney NSW 2052, Australia</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Boller, Francois" sort="Boller, Francois" uniqKey="Boller F" first="Francois" last="Boller">Francois Boller</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="aff3">fboller@broca.inserm.fr, INSERM Unit 549, Paris, France</nlm:aff></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Journal of the Medical Library Association</title><idno type="ISSN">1536-5050</idno><idno type="eISSN">1558-9439</idno><imprint><date when="2007">2007</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><bold>Objective:</bold> To explore journal quality as perceived by clinicians and researchers in clinical neurology.</p><p><bold>Methods:</bold> A survey was conducted from August 2003 to January 2004. Ratings for 41 selected clinical neurology journals were obtained from 254 members of the World Federation of Neurology (1,500 solicited; response rate 17%). Participants provided demographic information and rated each journal on a 5-point Likert scale. Average ratings for all journals were compared with the ISI's journal impact factors. Ratings for each journal were also compared across geographic regions and respondent publication productivity.</p><p><bold>Results:</bold> The top 5 journals were rated much more highly than the others, with mean ratings greater than 4. Mean journal ratings were highly correlated with journal impact factors (r = 0.67). Most of the top 10 journal ratings were consistent across the subgroups of geographic regions and journal paper productivity. However, significant differences among the different geographical regions and respondent productivity groups were also found for a few journals.</p><p><bold>Conclusions:</bold> The results provide valuable insight on how neurological experts perceive journals in clinical neurology. These results will likely aid researchers and clinicians in identifying potentially desirable research outlets and indicate journal status for editors. Likewise, biomedical librarians may use these results for serials collection development.</p></div></front></TEI><pmc article-type="research-article"><pmc-comment>The publisher of this article does not allow downloading of the full text in XML form.</pmc-comment>
<front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">J Med Libr Assoc</journal-id><journal-title>Journal of the Medical Library Association</journal-title><issn pub-type="ppub">1536-5050</issn><issn pub-type="epub">1558-9439</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Medical Library Association</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="pmid">17252069</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="pmc">1773051</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Papers</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Peer assessment of journal quality in clinical neurology</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Yue</surname><given-names>Weiping</given-names></name><degrees>PhD</degrees><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Wilson</surname><given-names>Concepción S.</given-names></name><degrees>PhD</degrees><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Boller</surname><given-names>Francois</given-names></name><degrees>MD, PhD</degrees><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">3</xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><email>weipingyue@gmail.com</email>, Research Associate</aff><aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><email>c.wilson@unsw.edu.au</email>, Associate Professor, School of Information Systems, Technology and Management, University of New South Wales, Sydney NSW 2052, Australia</aff><aff id="aff3"><label>3</label>fboller@broca.inserm.fr, INSERM Unit 549, Paris, France</aff><pub-date pub-type="ppub"><month>1</month><year>2007</year></pub-date><volume>95</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>70</fpage><lpage>76</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><month>7</month><year>2005</year></date><date date-type="accepted"><month>9</month><year>2006</year></date></history><copyright-statement>Copyright © 2007, Medical Library Association</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2007</copyright-year><abstract><p><bold>Objective:</bold> To explore journal quality as perceived by clinicians and researchers in clinical neurology.</p><p><bold>Methods:</bold> A survey was conducted from August 2003 to January 2004. Ratings for 41 selected clinical neurology journals were obtained from 254 members of the World Federation of Neurology (1,500 solicited; response rate 17%). Participants provided demographic information and rated each journal on a 5-point Likert scale. Average ratings for all journals were compared with the ISI's journal impact factors. Ratings for each journal were also compared across geographic regions and respondent publication productivity.</p><p><bold>Results:</bold> The top 5 journals were rated much more highly than the others, with mean ratings greater than 4. Mean journal ratings were highly correlated with journal impact factors (r = 0.67). Most of the top 10 journal ratings were consistent across the subgroups of geographic regions and journal paper productivity. However, significant differences among the different geographical regions and respondent productivity groups were also found for a few journals.</p><p><bold>Conclusions:</bold> The results provide valuable insight on how neurological experts perceive journals in clinical neurology. These results will likely aid researchers and clinicians in identifying potentially desirable research outlets and indicate journal status for editors. Likewise, biomedical librarians may use these results for serials collection development.</p></abstract></article-meta></front></pmc></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Asie/explor/AustralieFrV1/Data/Pmc/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 0010230 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 0010230 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Asie
|area= AustralieFrV1
|flux= Pmc
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé=
|texte=
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |