AustralieFrV1, PascalFrancis, Corpus, bibRecord, 003A13

Induction and comparison of different in vitro morphogenesis pathways using embryo of cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.) as a model material

Identifieur interne : 003A13 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 003A12; suivant : 003A14

Induction and comparison of different in vitro morphogenesis pathways using embryo of cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.) as a model material

Auteurs : Esmaeil Ebrahimie ; MOHAMMAD REZA NAGHAVI ; Abdolhadi Hosseinzadeh ; MOHAMMAD REZA BEHAMTA ; Manijeh Mohammadi-Dehcheshmeh ; Ahmad Sarrafi ; German Spangenberg

Source :

Plant cell, tissue and organ culture [ 0167-6857 ] ; 2007.

RBID : Pascal:07-0403866

Descripteurs français

Pascal (Inist)
- Induction, Etude comparative, In vitro, Morphogenèse, Embryon somatique, Cuminum cyminum, Modèle, Régénération, Génotype, Organogenèse, Développement embryonnaire.

English descriptors

KwdEn :
- Comparative study, Cuminum cyminum, Embryonic development, Genotype, In vitro, Induction, Models, Morphogenesis, Organogenesis, Regeneration, Somatic embryo.

Abstract

In this study, using cumin embryo as explant and manipulating plant growth regulators (PGRs) in regeneration medium, the main in vitro morphogenesis pathways including direct shoot organogenesis, direct somatic embryogenesis, indirect somatic embryogenesis, and indirect shoot organogenesis were obtained. The effects of PGRs, subculture, and light on the induction and progression of different pathways were studied in detail. Direct shoot organogenesis occurred on the meristematic zone, while direct somatic embryogenesis was observed on hypocotyl part of cumin embryo (more differentiated part). Application of BAP (0.1 mgl^-1) was the sole triggering factor for induction of callus and indirect regeneration pathways. Exogenous IAA played the central role in the direct somatic embryogenesis pathway; however, the combined effects of IAA and NAA along with the high endogenous cytokinin level resulted in direct shoot organogenesis. Subculturing revealed accelerating effects on direct somatic embryogenesis pathway and callus formation. Conversely, subculturing had negative effect on direct shoot organogenesis pathway. In certain combinations of PGRs, like 0.4 mgl^-1 IAA + 0.4 mgl^-1 NAA, co-induction and co-regeneration of different pathways were observed. Investigation of genotype dependencies of different pathways showed that direct pathways are more genotype-dependent, stable, and faster than indirect pathways. This research presents the embryo of cumin as a convenient model material for induction and comparison of different morphogenesis pathways.

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.

A01	`01`	`1`		`@0 0167-6857`
A02	`01`			`@0 PTCEDJ`
A03		`1`		`@0 Plant cell tissue organ cult.`
A05				`@2 90`
A06				`@2 3`
A08	`01`	`1`	`ENG`	`@1 Induction and comparison of different in vitro morphogenesis pathways using embryo of cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.) as a model material`
A11	`01`	`1`		`@1 EBRAHIMIE (Esmaeil)`
A11	`02`	`1`		`@1 MOHAMMAD REZA NAGHAVI`
A11	`03`	`1`		`@1 HOSSEINZADEH (Abdolhadi)`
A11	`04`	`1`		`@1 MOHAMMAD REZA BEHAMTA`
A11	`05`	`1`		`@1 MOHAMMADI-DEHCHESHMEH (Manijeh)`
A11	`06`	`1`		`@1 SARRAFI (Ahmad)`
A11	`07`	`1`		`@1 SPANGENBERG (German)`
A14	`01`			`@1 Department of Crop Production and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Shiraz @2 Shiraz @3 IRN @Z 1 aut.`
A14	`02`			`@1 Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tehran @2 Karaj @3 IRN @Z 2 aut. @Z 3 aut. @Z 4 aut.`
A14	`03`			`@1 Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tehran @2 Karaj @3 IRN @Z 5 aut.`
A14	`04`			`@1 Laboratoire de Biotechnologie, et Amelioration des Plantes @2 Castanet @3 FRA @Z 6 aut.`
A14	`05`			`@1 Plant Biotechnology Centre, Victorian AgriBiosciences Centre, LaTrobe R&D Park @2 Bundoora, VIC @3 AUS @Z 7 aut.`
A20				`@1 293-311`
A21				`@1 2007`
A23	`01`			`@0 ENG`
A43	`01`			`@1 INIST @2 19374 @5 354000146623090080`
A44				`@0 0000 @1 © 2007 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.`
A45				`@0 1 p.`
A47	`01`	`1`		`@0 07-0403866`
A60				`@1 P`
A61				`@0 A`
A64	`01`	`1`		`@0 Plant cell, tissue and organ culture`
A66	`01`			`@0 NLD`
C01	`01`		`ENG`	@0 In this study, using cumin embryo as explant and manipulating plant growth regulators (PGRs) in regeneration medium, the main in vitro morphogenesis pathways including direct shoot organogenesis, direct somatic embryogenesis, indirect somatic embryogenesis, and indirect shoot organogenesis were obtained. The effects of PGRs, subculture, and light on the induction and progression of different pathways were studied in detail. Direct shoot organogenesis occurred on the meristematic zone, while direct somatic embryogenesis was observed on hypocotyl part of cumin embryo (more differentiated part). Application of BAP (0.1 mgl^-1) was the sole triggering factor for induction of callus and indirect regeneration pathways. Exogenous IAA played the central role in the direct somatic embryogenesis pathway; however, the combined effects of IAA and NAA along with the high endogenous cytokinin level resulted in direct shoot organogenesis. Subculturing revealed accelerating effects on direct somatic embryogenesis pathway and callus formation. Conversely, subculturing had negative effect on direct shoot organogenesis pathway. In certain combinations of PGRs, like 0.4 mgl^-1 IAA + 0.4 mgl^-1 NAA, co-induction and co-regeneration of different pathways were observed. Investigation of genotype dependencies of different pathways showed that direct pathways are more genotype-dependent, stable, and faster than indirect pathways. This research presents the embryo of cumin as a convenient model material for induction and comparison of different morphogenesis pathways.
C02	`01`	`X`		`@0 002A31C07C6`
C02	`02`	`X`		`@0 215`
C03	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Induction @5 01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Induction @5 01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Inducción @5 01`
C03	`02`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Etude comparative @5 02`
C03	`02`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Comparative study @5 02`
C03	`02`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Estudio comparativo @5 02`
C03	`03`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 In vitro @5 10`
C03	`03`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 In vitro @5 10`
C03	`03`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 In vitro @5 10`
C03	`04`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Morphogenèse @5 11`
C03	`04`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Morphogenesis @5 11`
C03	`04`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Morfogénesis @5 11`
C03	`05`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Embryon somatique @5 12`
C03	`05`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Somatic embryo @5 12`
C03	`05`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Embrión somático @5 12`
C03	`06`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Cuminum cyminum @2 NS @5 13`
C03	`06`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Cuminum cyminum @2 NS @5 13`
C03	`06`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Cuminum cyminum @2 NS @5 13`
C03	`07`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Modèle @5 19`
C03	`07`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Models @5 19`
C03	`07`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Modelo @5 19`
C03	`08`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Régénération @5 20`
C03	`08`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Regeneration @5 20`
C03	`08`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Regeneración @5 20`
C03	`09`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Génotype @5 21`
C03	`09`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Genotype @5 21`
C03	`09`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Genotipo @5 21`
C03	`10`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Organogenèse @5 22`
C03	`10`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Organogenesis @5 22`
C03	`10`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Organogénesis @5 22`
C03	`11`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Développement embryonnaire @5 36`
C03	`11`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Embryonic development @5 36`
C03	`11`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Desarrollo embrionario @5 36`
C07	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Umbelliferae @2 NS`
C07	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Umbelliferae @2 NS`
C07	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Umbelliferae @2 NS`
C07	`02`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Dicotyledones @2 NS`
C07	`02`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Dicotyledones @2 NS`
C07	`02`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Dicotyledones @2 NS`
C07	`03`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Angiospermae @2 NS`
C07	`03`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Angiospermae @2 NS`
C07	`03`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Angiospermae @2 NS`
C07	`04`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Spermatophyta @2 NS`
C07	`04`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Spermatophyta @2 NS`
C07	`04`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Spermatophyta @2 NS`
N21				`@1 260`

Format Inist (serveur)

NO :	PASCAL 07-0403866 INIST
ET :	Induction and comparison of different in vitro morphogenesis pathways using embryo of cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.) as a model material
AU :	EBRAHIMIE (Esmaeil); MOHAMMAD REZA NAGHAVI; HOSSEINZADEH (Abdolhadi); MOHAMMAD REZA BEHAMTA; MOHAMMADI-DEHCHESHMEH (Manijeh); SARRAFI (Ahmad); SPANGENBERG (German)
AF :	Department of Crop Production and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Shiraz/Shiraz/Iran (1 aut.); Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tehran/Karaj/Iran (2 aut., 3 aut., 4 aut.); Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tehran/Karaj/Iran (5 aut.); Laboratoire de Biotechnologie, et Amelioration des Plantes/Castanet/France (6 aut.); Plant Biotechnology Centre, Victorian AgriBiosciences Centre, LaTrobe R&D Park/Bundoora, VIC/Australie (7 aut.)
DT :	Publication en série; Niveau analytique
SO :	Plant cell, tissue and organ culture; ISSN 0167-6857; Coden PTCEDJ; Pays-Bas; Da. 2007; Vol. 90; No. 3; Pp. 293-311; Bibl. 1 p.
LA :	Anglais
EA :	In this study, using cumin embryo as explant and manipulating plant growth regulators (PGRs) in regeneration medium, the main in vitro morphogenesis pathways including direct shoot organogenesis, direct somatic embryogenesis, indirect somatic embryogenesis, and indirect shoot organogenesis were obtained. The effects of PGRs, subculture, and light on the induction and progression of different pathways were studied in detail. Direct shoot organogenesis occurred on the meristematic zone, while direct somatic embryogenesis was observed on hypocotyl part of cumin embryo (more differentiated part). Application of BAP (0.1 mgl^-1) was the sole triggering factor for induction of callus and indirect regeneration pathways. Exogenous IAA played the central role in the direct somatic embryogenesis pathway; however, the combined effects of IAA and NAA along with the high endogenous cytokinin level resulted in direct shoot organogenesis. Subculturing revealed accelerating effects on direct somatic embryogenesis pathway and callus formation. Conversely, subculturing had negative effect on direct shoot organogenesis pathway. In certain combinations of PGRs, like 0.4 mgl^-1 IAA + 0.4 mgl^-1 NAA, co-induction and co-regeneration of different pathways were observed. Investigation of genotype dependencies of different pathways showed that direct pathways are more genotype-dependent, stable, and faster than indirect pathways. This research presents the embryo of cumin as a convenient model material for induction and comparison of different morphogenesis pathways.
CC :	002A31C07C6; 215
FD :	Induction; Etude comparative; In vitro; Morphogenèse; Embryon somatique; Cuminum cyminum; Modèle; Régénération; Génotype; Organogenèse; Développement embryonnaire
FG :	Umbelliferae; Dicotyledones; Angiospermae; Spermatophyta
ED :	Induction; Comparative study; In vitro; Morphogenesis; Somatic embryo; Cuminum cyminum; Models; Regeneration; Genotype; Organogenesis; Embryonic development
EG :	Umbelliferae; Dicotyledones; Angiospermae; Spermatophyta
SD :	Inducción; Estudio comparativo; In vitro; Morfogénesis; Embrión somático; Cuminum cyminum; Modelo; Regeneración; Genotipo; Organogénesis; Desarrollo embrionario
LO :	INIST-19374.354000146623090080
ID :	07-0403866

Links to Exploration step

Pascal:07-0403866

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Induction and comparison of different in vitro morphogenesis pathways using embryo of cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.) as a model material</title>
<author><name sortKey="Ebrahimie, Esmaeil" sort="Ebrahimie, Esmaeil" uniqKey="Ebrahimie E" first="Esmaeil" last="Ebrahimie">Esmaeil Ebrahimie</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Crop Production and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Shiraz</s1>
<s2>Shiraz</s2>
<s3>IRN</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Mohammad Reza Naghavi" sort="Mohammad Reza Naghavi" uniqKey="Mohammad Reza Naghavi" last="Mohammad Reza Naghavi">MOHAMMAD REZA NAGHAVI</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tehran</s1>
<s2>Karaj</s2>
<s3>IRN</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Hosseinzadeh, Abdolhadi" sort="Hosseinzadeh, Abdolhadi" uniqKey="Hosseinzadeh A" first="Abdolhadi" last="Hosseinzadeh">Abdolhadi Hosseinzadeh</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tehran</s1>
<s2>Karaj</s2>
<s3>IRN</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Mohammad Reza Behamta" sort="Mohammad Reza Behamta" uniqKey="Mohammad Reza Behamta" last="Mohammad Reza Behamta">MOHAMMAD REZA BEHAMTA</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tehran</s1>
<s2>Karaj</s2>
<s3>IRN</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Mohammadi Dehcheshmeh, Manijeh" sort="Mohammadi Dehcheshmeh, Manijeh" uniqKey="Mohammadi Dehcheshmeh M" first="Manijeh" last="Mohammadi-Dehcheshmeh">Manijeh Mohammadi-Dehcheshmeh</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="03"><s1>Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tehran</s1>
<s2>Karaj</s2>
<s3>IRN</s3>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Sarrafi, Ahmad" sort="Sarrafi, Ahmad" uniqKey="Sarrafi A" first="Ahmad" last="Sarrafi">Ahmad Sarrafi</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="04"><s1>Laboratoire de Biotechnologie, et Amelioration des Plantes</s1>
<s2>Castanet</s2>
<s3>FRA</s3>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Spangenberg, German" sort="Spangenberg, German" uniqKey="Spangenberg G" first="German" last="Spangenberg">German Spangenberg</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="05"><s1>Plant Biotechnology Centre, Victorian AgriBiosciences Centre, LaTrobe R&D Park</s1>
<s2>Bundoora, VIC</s2>
<s3>AUS</s3>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">07-0403866</idno>
<date when="2007">2007</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 07-0403866 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:07-0403866</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">003A13</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Induction and comparison of different in vitro morphogenesis pathways using embryo of cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.) as a model material</title>
<author><name sortKey="Ebrahimie, Esmaeil" sort="Ebrahimie, Esmaeil" uniqKey="Ebrahimie E" first="Esmaeil" last="Ebrahimie">Esmaeil Ebrahimie</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Crop Production and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Shiraz</s1>
<s2>Shiraz</s2>
<s3>IRN</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Mohammad Reza Naghavi" sort="Mohammad Reza Naghavi" uniqKey="Mohammad Reza Naghavi" last="Mohammad Reza Naghavi">MOHAMMAD REZA NAGHAVI</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tehran</s1>
<s2>Karaj</s2>
<s3>IRN</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Hosseinzadeh, Abdolhadi" sort="Hosseinzadeh, Abdolhadi" uniqKey="Hosseinzadeh A" first="Abdolhadi" last="Hosseinzadeh">Abdolhadi Hosseinzadeh</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tehran</s1>
<s2>Karaj</s2>
<s3>IRN</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Mohammad Reza Behamta" sort="Mohammad Reza Behamta" uniqKey="Mohammad Reza Behamta" last="Mohammad Reza Behamta">MOHAMMAD REZA BEHAMTA</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tehran</s1>
<s2>Karaj</s2>
<s3>IRN</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Mohammadi Dehcheshmeh, Manijeh" sort="Mohammadi Dehcheshmeh, Manijeh" uniqKey="Mohammadi Dehcheshmeh M" first="Manijeh" last="Mohammadi-Dehcheshmeh">Manijeh Mohammadi-Dehcheshmeh</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="03"><s1>Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tehran</s1>
<s2>Karaj</s2>
<s3>IRN</s3>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Sarrafi, Ahmad" sort="Sarrafi, Ahmad" uniqKey="Sarrafi A" first="Ahmad" last="Sarrafi">Ahmad Sarrafi</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="04"><s1>Laboratoire de Biotechnologie, et Amelioration des Plantes</s1>
<s2>Castanet</s2>
<s3>FRA</s3>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Spangenberg, German" sort="Spangenberg, German" uniqKey="Spangenberg G" first="German" last="Spangenberg">German Spangenberg</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="05"><s1>Plant Biotechnology Centre, Victorian AgriBiosciences Centre, LaTrobe R&D Park</s1>
<s2>Bundoora, VIC</s2>
<s3>AUS</s3>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Plant cell, tissue and organ culture</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Plant cell tissue organ cult.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0167-6857</idno>
<imprint><date when="2007">2007</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Plant cell, tissue and organ culture</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Plant cell tissue organ cult.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0167-6857</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Comparative study</term>
<term>Cuminum cyminum</term>
<term>Embryonic development</term>
<term>Genotype</term>
<term>In vitro</term>
<term>Induction</term>
<term>Models</term>
<term>Morphogenesis</term>
<term>Organogenesis</term>
<term>Regeneration</term>
<term>Somatic embryo</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Induction</term>
<term>Etude comparative</term>
<term>In vitro</term>
<term>Morphogenèse</term>
<term>Embryon somatique</term>
<term>Cuminum cyminum</term>
<term>Modèle</term>
<term>Régénération</term>
<term>Génotype</term>
<term>Organogenèse</term>
<term>Développement embryonnaire</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">In this study, using cumin embryo as explant and manipulating plant growth regulators (PGRs) in regeneration medium, the main in vitro morphogenesis pathways including direct shoot organogenesis, direct somatic embryogenesis, indirect somatic embryogenesis, and indirect shoot organogenesis were obtained. The effects of PGRs, subculture, and light on the induction and progression of different pathways were studied in detail. Direct shoot organogenesis occurred on the meristematic zone, while direct somatic embryogenesis was observed on hypocotyl part of cumin embryo (more differentiated part). Application of BAP (0.1 mgl<sup>-1</sup>
) was the sole triggering factor for induction of callus and indirect regeneration pathways. Exogenous IAA played the central role in the direct somatic embryogenesis pathway; however, the combined effects of IAA and NAA along with the high endogenous cytokinin level resulted in direct shoot organogenesis. Subculturing revealed accelerating effects on direct somatic embryogenesis pathway and callus formation. Conversely, subculturing had negative effect on direct shoot organogenesis pathway. In certain combinations of PGRs, like 0.4 mgl<sup>-1</sup>
 IAA + 0.4 mgl<sup>-1</sup>
 NAA, co-induction and co-regeneration of different pathways were observed. Investigation of genotype dependencies of different pathways showed that direct pathways are more genotype-dependent, stable, and faster than indirect pathways. This research presents the embryo of cumin as a convenient model material for induction and comparison of different morphogenesis pathways.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0167-6857</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01"><s0>PTCEDJ</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>Plant cell tissue organ cult.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>90</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>3</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Induction and comparison of different in vitro morphogenesis pathways using embryo of cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.) as a model material</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>EBRAHIMIE (Esmaeil)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>MOHAMMAD REZA NAGHAVI</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1"><s1>HOSSEINZADEH (Abdolhadi)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="04" i2="1"><s1>MOHAMMAD REZA BEHAMTA</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="05" i2="1"><s1>MOHAMMADI-DEHCHESHMEH (Manijeh)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="06" i2="1"><s1>SARRAFI (Ahmad)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="07" i2="1"><s1>SPANGENBERG (German)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Crop Production and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Shiraz</s1>
<s2>Shiraz</s2>
<s3>IRN</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tehran</s1>
<s2>Karaj</s2>
<s3>IRN</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="03"><s1>Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tehran</s1>
<s2>Karaj</s2>
<s3>IRN</s3>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="04"><s1>Laboratoire de Biotechnologie, et Amelioration des Plantes</s1>
<s2>Castanet</s2>
<s3>FRA</s3>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="05"><s1>Plant Biotechnology Centre, Victorian AgriBiosciences Centre, LaTrobe R&D Park</s1>
<s2>Bundoora, VIC</s2>
<s3>AUS</s3>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>293-311</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>2007</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>19374</s2>
<s5>354000146623090080</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2007 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>1 p.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>07-0403866</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Plant cell, tissue and organ culture</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>NLD</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>In this study, using cumin embryo as explant and manipulating plant growth regulators (PGRs) in regeneration medium, the main in vitro morphogenesis pathways including direct shoot organogenesis, direct somatic embryogenesis, indirect somatic embryogenesis, and indirect shoot organogenesis were obtained. The effects of PGRs, subculture, and light on the induction and progression of different pathways were studied in detail. Direct shoot organogenesis occurred on the meristematic zone, while direct somatic embryogenesis was observed on hypocotyl part of cumin embryo (more differentiated part). Application of BAP (0.1 mgl<sup>-1</sup>
) was the sole triggering factor for induction of callus and indirect regeneration pathways. Exogenous IAA played the central role in the direct somatic embryogenesis pathway; however, the combined effects of IAA and NAA along with the high endogenous cytokinin level resulted in direct shoot organogenesis. Subculturing revealed accelerating effects on direct somatic embryogenesis pathway and callus formation. Conversely, subculturing had negative effect on direct shoot organogenesis pathway. In certain combinations of PGRs, like 0.4 mgl<sup>-1</sup>
 IAA + 0.4 mgl<sup>-1</sup>
 NAA, co-induction and co-regeneration of different pathways were observed. Investigation of genotype dependencies of different pathways showed that direct pathways are more genotype-dependent, stable, and faster than indirect pathways. This research presents the embryo of cumin as a convenient model material for induction and comparison of different morphogenesis pathways.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002A31C07C6</s0>
</fC02>
<fC02 i1="02" i2="X"><s0>215</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Induction</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Induction</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Inducción</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Etude comparative</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Comparative study</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Estudio comparativo</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>In vitro</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>In vitro</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>In vitro</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Morphogenèse</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Morphogenesis</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Morfogénesis</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Embryon somatique</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Somatic embryo</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Embrión somático</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Cuminum cyminum</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Cuminum cyminum</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Cuminum cyminum</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Modèle</s0>
<s5>19</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Models</s0>
<s5>19</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Modelo</s0>
<s5>19</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Régénération</s0>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Regeneration</s0>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Regeneración</s0>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Génotype</s0>
<s5>21</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Genotype</s0>
<s5>21</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Genotipo</s0>
<s5>21</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Organogenèse</s0>
<s5>22</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Organogenesis</s0>
<s5>22</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Organogénesis</s0>
<s5>22</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Développement embryonnaire</s0>
<s5>36</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Embryonic development</s0>
<s5>36</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Desarrollo embrionario</s0>
<s5>36</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Umbelliferae</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Umbelliferae</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Umbelliferae</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Dicotyledones</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Dicotyledones</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Dicotyledones</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Angiospermae</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Angiospermae</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Angiospermae</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Spermatophyta</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Spermatophyta</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Spermatophyta</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fN21><s1>260</s1>
</fN21>
</pA>
</standard>
<server><NO>PASCAL 07-0403866 INIST</NO>
<ET>Induction and comparison of different in vitro morphogenesis pathways using embryo of cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.) as a model material</ET>
<AU>EBRAHIMIE (Esmaeil); MOHAMMAD REZA NAGHAVI; HOSSEINZADEH (Abdolhadi); MOHAMMAD REZA BEHAMTA; MOHAMMADI-DEHCHESHMEH (Manijeh); SARRAFI (Ahmad); SPANGENBERG (German)</AU>
<AF>Department of Crop Production and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Shiraz/Shiraz/Iran (1 aut.); Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tehran/Karaj/Iran (2 aut., 3 aut., 4 aut.); Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tehran/Karaj/Iran (5 aut.); Laboratoire de Biotechnologie, et Amelioration des Plantes/Castanet/France (6 aut.); Plant Biotechnology Centre, Victorian AgriBiosciences Centre, LaTrobe R&D Park/Bundoora, VIC/Australie (7 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Plant cell, tissue and organ culture; ISSN 0167-6857; Coden PTCEDJ; Pays-Bas; Da. 2007; Vol. 90; No. 3; Pp. 293-311; Bibl. 1 p.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>In this study, using cumin embryo as explant and manipulating plant growth regulators (PGRs) in regeneration medium, the main in vitro morphogenesis pathways including direct shoot organogenesis, direct somatic embryogenesis, indirect somatic embryogenesis, and indirect shoot organogenesis were obtained. The effects of PGRs, subculture, and light on the induction and progression of different pathways were studied in detail. Direct shoot organogenesis occurred on the meristematic zone, while direct somatic embryogenesis was observed on hypocotyl part of cumin embryo (more differentiated part). Application of BAP (0.1 mgl<sup>-1</sup>
) was the sole triggering factor for induction of callus and indirect regeneration pathways. Exogenous IAA played the central role in the direct somatic embryogenesis pathway; however, the combined effects of IAA and NAA along with the high endogenous cytokinin level resulted in direct shoot organogenesis. Subculturing revealed accelerating effects on direct somatic embryogenesis pathway and callus formation. Conversely, subculturing had negative effect on direct shoot organogenesis pathway. In certain combinations of PGRs, like 0.4 mgl<sup>-1</sup>
 IAA + 0.4 mgl<sup>-1</sup>
 NAA, co-induction and co-regeneration of different pathways were observed. Investigation of genotype dependencies of different pathways showed that direct pathways are more genotype-dependent, stable, and faster than indirect pathways. This research presents the embryo of cumin as a convenient model material for induction and comparison of different morphogenesis pathways.</EA>
<CC>002A31C07C6; 215</CC>
<FD>Induction; Etude comparative; In vitro; Morphogenèse; Embryon somatique; Cuminum cyminum; Modèle; Régénération; Génotype; Organogenèse; Développement embryonnaire</FD>
<FG>Umbelliferae; Dicotyledones; Angiospermae; Spermatophyta</FG>
<ED>Induction; Comparative study; In vitro; Morphogenesis; Somatic embryo; Cuminum cyminum; Models; Regeneration; Genotype; Organogenesis; Embryonic development</ED>
<EG>Umbelliferae; Dicotyledones; Angiospermae; Spermatophyta</EG>
<SD>Inducción; Estudio comparativo; In vitro; Morfogénesis; Embrión somático; Cuminum cyminum; Modelo; Regeneración; Genotipo; Organogénesis; Desarrollo embrionario</SD>
<LO>INIST-19374.354000146623090080</LO>
<ID>07-0403866</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Asie/explor/AustralieFrV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003A13 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 003A13 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Asie
   |area=    AustralieFrV1
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Pascal:07-0403866
   |texte=   Induction and comparison of different in vitro morphogenesis pathways using embryo of cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.) as a model material
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33.
Data generation: Tue Dec 5 10:43:12 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 5 14:07:20 2024

	Serveur d'exploration sur les relations entre la France et l'Australie
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur les relations entre la France et l'Australie

Induction and comparison of different in vitro morphogenesis pathways using embryo of cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.) as a model material

Induction and comparison of different in vitro morphogenesis pathways using embryo of cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.) as a model material

Source :

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Format Inist (serveur)

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri