AustralieFrV1, PascalFrancis, Corpus, bibRecord, 003417

Phonological Phrase Boundaries Constrain the Online Syntactic Analysis of Spoken Sentences

Identifieur interne : 003417 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 003416; suivant : 003418

Phonological Phrase Boundaries Constrain the Online Syntactic Analysis of Spoken Sentences

Auteurs : Séverine Millotte ; Roger Wales ; Alice Rene ; Anne Christophe

Source :

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition [ 0278-7393 ] ; 2008.

RBID : Pascal:08-0350225

Descripteurs français

Pascal (Inist)
- Phonologie, Langage, Syntaxe, Parole, Production verbale, Phrase, Prosodie, Ambiguité, Désambiguïsation, Etude expérimentale, Cognition, Homme.

English descriptors

KwdEn :
- Ambiguity, Cognition, Disambiguation, Experimental study, Human, Language, Phonology, Prosody, Sentence, Speech, Syntax, Verbal production.

Abstract

Two experiments tested whether phonological phrase boundaries constrain online syntactic analysis in French. Pairs of homophones belonging to different syntactic categories (verb and adjective) were used to create sentences with a local syntactic ambiguity (e.g., [le petit chien mort], in English, the dead little dog, vs. [le petit chien] [mord], in English, the little dog bites, where brackets indicate phonological phrase boundaries). An expert speaker recorded the sentences with either a maximally informative prosody or a minimally informative one. Participants correctly assigned the appropriate syntactic category to the target word, even without any access to the lexical disambiguating information, in both a completion task (Experiment 1) and an abstract word detection task (Experiment 2). The size of the experimental effect was modulated by the prosodic manipulation (maximally vs. minimally informative), guaranteeing that prosody played a crucial role in disambiguation. The authors discuss the implications of these results for models of online speech perception and language acquisition.

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.

A01	`01`	`1`		`@0 0278-7393`
A03		`1`		`@0 J. exper. psychol., Learn., mem., cogn.`
A05				`@2 34`
A06				`@2 4`
A08	`01`	`1`	`ENG`	`@1 Phonological Phrase Boundaries Constrain the Online Syntactic Analysis of Spoken Sentences`
A11	`01`	`1`		`@1 MILLOTTE (Séverine)`
A11	`02`	`1`		`@1 WALES (Roger)`
A11	`03`	`1`		`@1 RENE (Alice)`
A11	`04`	`1`		`@1 CHRISTOPHE (Anne)`
A14	`01`			`@1 Université de Genève @3 CHE @Z 1 aut.`
A14	`02`			`@1 Ecole Normale Supérieure @3 FRA @Z 1 aut. @Z 3 aut. @Z 4 aut.`
A14	`03`			`@1 La Trobe University @3 AUS @Z 2 aut.`
A14	`04`			`@1 Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique @3 FRA @Z 3 aut.`
A14	`05`			`@1 Maternité Port-Royal @3 FRA @Z 4 aut.`
A20				`@1 874-885`
A21				`@1 2008`
A23	`01`			`@0 ENG`
A43	`01`			`@1 INIST @2 3032C @5 354000197608680120`
A44				`@0 0000 @1 © 2008 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.`
A45				`@0 1 p.1/2`
A47	`01`	`1`		`@0 08-0350225`
A60				`@1 P`
A61				`@0 A`
A64	`01`	`1`		`@0 Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition`
A66	`01`			`@0 USA`
C01	`01`		`ENG`	@0 Two experiments tested whether phonological phrase boundaries constrain online syntactic analysis in French. Pairs of homophones belonging to different syntactic categories (verb and adjective) were used to create sentences with a local syntactic ambiguity (e.g., [le petit chien mort], in English, the dead little dog, vs. [le petit chien] [mord], in English, the little dog bites, where brackets indicate phonological phrase boundaries). An expert speaker recorded the sentences with either a maximally informative prosody or a minimally informative one. Participants correctly assigned the appropriate syntactic category to the target word, even without any access to the lexical disambiguating information, in both a completion task (Experiment 1) and an abstract word detection task (Experiment 2). The size of the experimental effect was modulated by the prosodic manipulation (maximally vs. minimally informative), guaranteeing that prosody played a crucial role in disambiguation. The authors discuss the implications of these results for models of online speech perception and language acquisition.
C02	`01`	`X`		`@0 002A26I03`
C03	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Phonologie @5 01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Phonology @5 01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Fonología @5 01`
C03	`02`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Langage @5 02`
C03	`02`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Language @5 02`
C03	`02`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Lenguaje @5 02`
C03	`03`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Syntaxe @5 03`
C03	`03`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Syntax @5 03`
C03	`03`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Sintaxis @5 03`
C03	`04`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Parole @5 04`
C03	`04`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Speech @5 04`
C03	`04`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Habla @5 04`
C03	`05`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Production verbale @5 05`
C03	`05`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Verbal production @5 05`
C03	`05`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Producción verbal @5 05`
C03	`06`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Phrase @5 06`
C03	`06`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Sentence @5 06`
C03	`06`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Frase @5 06`
C03	`07`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Prosodie @5 07`
C03	`07`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Prosody @5 07`
C03	`07`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Prosodia @5 07`
C03	`08`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Ambiguité @5 08`
C03	`08`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Ambiguity @5 08`
C03	`08`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Ambiguedad @5 08`
C03	`09`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Désambiguïsation @5 09`
C03	`09`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Disambiguation @5 09`
C03	`09`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Desambiguisación @5 09`
C03	`10`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Etude expérimentale @5 10`
C03	`10`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Experimental study @5 10`
C03	`10`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Estudio experimental @5 10`
C03	`11`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Cognition @5 11`
C03	`11`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Cognition @5 11`
C03	`11`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Cognición @5 11`
C03	`12`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Homme @5 18`
C03	`12`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Human @5 18`
C03	`12`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Hombre @5 18`
N21				`@1 217`

Format Inist (serveur)

NO :	PASCAL 08-0350225 INIST
ET :	Phonological Phrase Boundaries Constrain the Online Syntactic Analysis of Spoken Sentences
AU :	MILLOTTE (Séverine); WALES (Roger); RENE (Alice); CHRISTOPHE (Anne)
AF :	Université de Genève/Suisse (1 aut.); Ecole Normale Supérieure/France (1 aut., 3 aut., 4 aut.); La Trobe University/Australie (2 aut.); Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique/France (3 aut.); Maternité Port-Royal/France (4 aut.)
DT :	Publication en série; Niveau analytique
SO :	Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition; ISSN 0278-7393; Etats-Unis; Da. 2008; Vol. 34; No. 4; Pp. 874-885; Bibl. 1 p.1/2
LA :	Anglais
EA :	Two experiments tested whether phonological phrase boundaries constrain online syntactic analysis in French. Pairs of homophones belonging to different syntactic categories (verb and adjective) were used to create sentences with a local syntactic ambiguity (e.g., [le petit chien mort], in English, the dead little dog, vs. [le petit chien] [mord], in English, the little dog bites, where brackets indicate phonological phrase boundaries). An expert speaker recorded the sentences with either a maximally informative prosody or a minimally informative one. Participants correctly assigned the appropriate syntactic category to the target word, even without any access to the lexical disambiguating information, in both a completion task (Experiment 1) and an abstract word detection task (Experiment 2). The size of the experimental effect was modulated by the prosodic manipulation (maximally vs. minimally informative), guaranteeing that prosody played a crucial role in disambiguation. The authors discuss the implications of these results for models of online speech perception and language acquisition.
CC :	002A26I03
FD :	Phonologie; Langage; Syntaxe; Parole; Production verbale; Phrase; Prosodie; Ambiguité; Désambiguïsation; Etude expérimentale; Cognition; Homme
ED :	Phonology; Language; Syntax; Speech; Verbal production; Sentence; Prosody; Ambiguity; Disambiguation; Experimental study; Cognition; Human
SD :	Fonología; Lenguaje; Sintaxis; Habla; Producción verbal; Frase; Prosodia; Ambiguedad; Desambiguisación; Estudio experimental; Cognición; Hombre
LO :	INIST-3032C.354000197608680120
ID :	08-0350225

Links to Exploration step

Pascal:08-0350225

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Phonological Phrase Boundaries Constrain the Online Syntactic Analysis of Spoken Sentences</title>
<author><name sortKey="Millotte, Severine" sort="Millotte, Severine" uniqKey="Millotte S" first="Séverine" last="Millotte">Séverine Millotte</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Université de Genève</s1>
<s3>CHE</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Ecole Normale Supérieure</s1>
<s3>FRA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Wales, Roger" sort="Wales, Roger" uniqKey="Wales R" first="Roger" last="Wales">Roger Wales</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="03"><s1>La Trobe University</s1>
<s3>AUS</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Rene, Alice" sort="Rene, Alice" uniqKey="Rene A" first="Alice" last="Rene">Alice Rene</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Ecole Normale Supérieure</s1>
<s3>FRA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="04"><s1>Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique</s1>
<s3>FRA</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Christophe, Anne" sort="Christophe, Anne" uniqKey="Christophe A" first="Anne" last="Christophe">Anne Christophe</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Ecole Normale Supérieure</s1>
<s3>FRA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="05"><s1>Maternité Port-Royal</s1>
<s3>FRA</s3>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">08-0350225</idno>
<date when="2008">2008</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 08-0350225 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:08-0350225</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">003417</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Phonological Phrase Boundaries Constrain the Online Syntactic Analysis of Spoken Sentences</title>
<author><name sortKey="Millotte, Severine" sort="Millotte, Severine" uniqKey="Millotte S" first="Séverine" last="Millotte">Séverine Millotte</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Université de Genève</s1>
<s3>CHE</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Ecole Normale Supérieure</s1>
<s3>FRA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Wales, Roger" sort="Wales, Roger" uniqKey="Wales R" first="Roger" last="Wales">Roger Wales</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="03"><s1>La Trobe University</s1>
<s3>AUS</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Rene, Alice" sort="Rene, Alice" uniqKey="Rene A" first="Alice" last="Rene">Alice Rene</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Ecole Normale Supérieure</s1>
<s3>FRA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="04"><s1>Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique</s1>
<s3>FRA</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Christophe, Anne" sort="Christophe, Anne" uniqKey="Christophe A" first="Anne" last="Christophe">Anne Christophe</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Ecole Normale Supérieure</s1>
<s3>FRA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="05"><s1>Maternité Port-Royal</s1>
<s3>FRA</s3>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. exper. psychol., Learn., mem., cogn.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0278-7393</idno>
<imprint><date when="2008">2008</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. exper. psychol., Learn., mem., cogn.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0278-7393</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Ambiguity</term>
<term>Cognition</term>
<term>Disambiguation</term>
<term>Experimental study</term>
<term>Human</term>
<term>Language</term>
<term>Phonology</term>
<term>Prosody</term>
<term>Sentence</term>
<term>Speech</term>
<term>Syntax</term>
<term>Verbal production</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Phonologie</term>
<term>Langage</term>
<term>Syntaxe</term>
<term>Parole</term>
<term>Production verbale</term>
<term>Phrase</term>
<term>Prosodie</term>
<term>Ambiguité</term>
<term>Désambiguïsation</term>
<term>Etude expérimentale</term>
<term>Cognition</term>
<term>Homme</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Two experiments tested whether phonological phrase boundaries constrain online syntactic analysis in French. Pairs of homophones belonging to different syntactic categories (verb and adjective) were used to create sentences with a local syntactic ambiguity (e.g., [le petit chien mort], in English, the dead little dog, vs. [le petit chien] [mord], in English, the little dog bites, where brackets indicate phonological phrase boundaries). An expert speaker recorded the sentences with either a maximally informative prosody or a minimally informative one. Participants correctly assigned the appropriate syntactic category to the target word, even without any access to the lexical disambiguating information, in both a completion task (Experiment 1) and an abstract word detection task (Experiment 2). The size of the experimental effect was modulated by the prosodic manipulation (maximally vs. minimally informative), guaranteeing that prosody played a crucial role in disambiguation. The authors discuss the implications of these results for models of online speech perception and language acquisition.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0278-7393</s0>
</fA01>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>J. exper. psychol., Learn., mem., cogn.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>34</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>4</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Phonological Phrase Boundaries Constrain the Online Syntactic Analysis of Spoken Sentences</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>MILLOTTE (Séverine)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>WALES (Roger)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1"><s1>RENE (Alice)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="04" i2="1"><s1>CHRISTOPHE (Anne)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>Université de Genève</s1>
<s3>CHE</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="02"><s1>Ecole Normale Supérieure</s1>
<s3>FRA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="03"><s1>La Trobe University</s1>
<s3>AUS</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="04"><s1>Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique</s1>
<s3>FRA</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="05"><s1>Maternité Port-Royal</s1>
<s3>FRA</s3>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>874-885</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>2008</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>3032C</s2>
<s5>354000197608680120</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2008 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>1 p.1/2</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>08-0350225</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>USA</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>Two experiments tested whether phonological phrase boundaries constrain online syntactic analysis in French. Pairs of homophones belonging to different syntactic categories (verb and adjective) were used to create sentences with a local syntactic ambiguity (e.g., [le petit chien mort], in English, the dead little dog, vs. [le petit chien] [mord], in English, the little dog bites, where brackets indicate phonological phrase boundaries). An expert speaker recorded the sentences with either a maximally informative prosody or a minimally informative one. Participants correctly assigned the appropriate syntactic category to the target word, even without any access to the lexical disambiguating information, in both a completion task (Experiment 1) and an abstract word detection task (Experiment 2). The size of the experimental effect was modulated by the prosodic manipulation (maximally vs. minimally informative), guaranteeing that prosody played a crucial role in disambiguation. The authors discuss the implications of these results for models of online speech perception and language acquisition.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002A26I03</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Phonologie</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Phonology</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Fonología</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Langage</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Language</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Lenguaje</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Syntaxe</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Syntax</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Sintaxis</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Parole</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Speech</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Habla</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Production verbale</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Verbal production</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Producción verbal</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Phrase</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Sentence</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Frase</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Prosodie</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Prosody</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Prosodia</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Ambiguité</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Ambiguity</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Ambiguedad</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Désambiguïsation</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Disambiguation</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Desambiguisación</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Etude expérimentale</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Experimental study</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Estudio experimental</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Cognition</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Cognition</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Cognición</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Homme</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Human</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Hombre</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fN21><s1>217</s1>
</fN21>
</pA>
</standard>
<server><NO>PASCAL 08-0350225 INIST</NO>
<ET>Phonological Phrase Boundaries Constrain the Online Syntactic Analysis of Spoken Sentences</ET>
<AU>MILLOTTE (Séverine); WALES (Roger); RENE (Alice); CHRISTOPHE (Anne)</AU>
<AF>Université de Genève/Suisse (1 aut.); Ecole Normale Supérieure/France (1 aut., 3 aut., 4 aut.); La Trobe University/Australie (2 aut.); Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique/France (3 aut.); Maternité Port-Royal/France (4 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition; ISSN 0278-7393; Etats-Unis; Da. 2008; Vol. 34; No. 4; Pp. 874-885; Bibl. 1 p.1/2</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>Two experiments tested whether phonological phrase boundaries constrain online syntactic analysis in French. Pairs of homophones belonging to different syntactic categories (verb and adjective) were used to create sentences with a local syntactic ambiguity (e.g., [le petit chien mort], in English, the dead little dog, vs. [le petit chien] [mord], in English, the little dog bites, where brackets indicate phonological phrase boundaries). An expert speaker recorded the sentences with either a maximally informative prosody or a minimally informative one. Participants correctly assigned the appropriate syntactic category to the target word, even without any access to the lexical disambiguating information, in both a completion task (Experiment 1) and an abstract word detection task (Experiment 2). The size of the experimental effect was modulated by the prosodic manipulation (maximally vs. minimally informative), guaranteeing that prosody played a crucial role in disambiguation. The authors discuss the implications of these results for models of online speech perception and language acquisition.</EA>
<CC>002A26I03</CC>
<FD>Phonologie; Langage; Syntaxe; Parole; Production verbale; Phrase; Prosodie; Ambiguité; Désambiguïsation; Etude expérimentale; Cognition; Homme</FD>
<ED>Phonology; Language; Syntax; Speech; Verbal production; Sentence; Prosody; Ambiguity; Disambiguation; Experimental study; Cognition; Human</ED>
<SD>Fonología; Lenguaje; Sintaxis; Habla; Producción verbal; Frase; Prosodia; Ambiguedad; Desambiguisación; Estudio experimental; Cognición; Hombre</SD>
<LO>INIST-3032C.354000197608680120</LO>
<ID>08-0350225</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Asie/explor/AustralieFrV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003417 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 003417 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Asie
   |area=    AustralieFrV1
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Pascal:08-0350225
   |texte=   Phonological Phrase Boundaries Constrain the Online Syntactic Analysis of Spoken Sentences
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33.
Data generation: Tue Dec 5 10:43:12 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 5 14:07:20 2024

	Serveur d'exploration sur les relations entre la France et l'Australie
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur les relations entre la France et l'Australie

Phonological Phrase Boundaries Constrain the Online Syntactic Analysis of Spoken Sentences

Phonological Phrase Boundaries Constrain the Online Syntactic Analysis of Spoken Sentences

Source :

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Format Inist (serveur)

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri