Becoming Organisms: The Organisation of Development and the Development of Organisation
Identifieur interne : 002196 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 002195; suivant : 002197Becoming Organisms: The Organisation of Development and the Development of Organisation
Auteurs : Laura Nuno De La RosaSource :
- History and philosophy of the life sciences [ 0391-9714 ] ; 2010.
Descripteurs français
- Pascal (Inist)
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
Despite the radical importance of embryology in the development of organicism, developmental biology remams philosophically underexplored as a theoretical and empirical resource to clarify the nature of organisms. This paper discusses how embryology can help develop the organisational definition of the organism as a differentiated, functionally integrated, and autonomous system. I distinguish two conceptions of development in the organisational tradition that yield two different conceptions of the organism: the life-history view claims that organisms can be considered as such during their whole ontogeny; the constitutive view distinguishes two periods in the life history, a period of generation and a period of self-maintenance of a constitutive organisation. Arguing in favour of the constitutive view, it will be claimed that the organisational criteria for the definition of organism (i.e., differentiation, functional integration, and autonomy) can only be applied to the developmental system when it has entered the period of self-maintenance of a constitutive organisation. Under the light of current research in developmental biology, it is possible to make explicit how organisms come to be as organisms. To this end, I explore key ontogenetic events that help us clarify the core aspects of animal organisation and allow us to identify the developmental stage that marks the ontological transition between an organism in potency and an organism in actuality. The structure of this ontogenetic unfolding parallels the conceptual structure of the very notion of organism; the generation of the being of a particular organism parallels its definition.
Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)
Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.
pA |
|
---|
Format Inist (serveur)
NO : | FRANCIS 11-0401858 INIST |
---|---|
FT : | (Organismes en devenir : organisation du développement et développement de l'organisation) |
ET : | Becoming Organisms: The Organisation of Development and the Development of Organisation |
AU : | NUNO DE LA ROSA (Laura); HUNEMAN (Philippe); WOLFE (Charles T.) |
AF : | Departamento de Filosofía I (Universidad Complutense de Madrid) and IHPST (Université Paris 1-Sorbonne) 13, rue du Four/75006 Paris/France (1 aut.); Institut d'Histoire et de Philosophie des Sciences et des Techniques, CNRS / Université Paris I Sorbonne, IHPST 13, rue du Four/75006 Paris/France (1 aut.); Unit for History and Philosophy of Science, University of Sydney, 437 Carslaw F07/Sydney, NSW 2006/Australie (2 aut.) |
DT : | Publication en série; Niveau analytique |
SO : | History and philosophy of the life sciences; ISSN 0391-9714; Italie; Da. 2010; Vol. 32; No. 2-3; Pp. 289-315; Bibl. 3 p.1/4 |
LA : | Anglais |
EA : | Despite the radical importance of embryology in the development of organicism, developmental biology remams philosophically underexplored as a theoretical and empirical resource to clarify the nature of organisms. This paper discusses how embryology can help develop the organisational definition of the organism as a differentiated, functionally integrated, and autonomous system. I distinguish two conceptions of development in the organisational tradition that yield two different conceptions of the organism: the life-history view claims that organisms can be considered as such during their whole ontogeny; the constitutive view distinguishes two periods in the life history, a period of generation and a period of self-maintenance of a constitutive organisation. Arguing in favour of the constitutive view, it will be claimed that the organisational criteria for the definition of organism (i.e., differentiation, functional integration, and autonomy) can only be applied to the developmental system when it has entered the period of self-maintenance of a constitutive organisation. Under the light of current research in developmental biology, it is possible to make explicit how organisms come to be as organisms. To this end, I explore key ontogenetic events that help us clarify the core aspects of animal organisation and allow us to identify the developmental stage that marks the ontological transition between an organism in potency and an organism in actuality. The structure of this ontogenetic unfolding parallels the conceptual structure of the very notion of organism; the generation of the being of a particular organism parallels its definition. |
CC : | 52240; 522360; 522 |
FD : | Organicisme; Développement; Morphogenèse; Autonomie; Organisme; Intégration fonctionnelle; Philosophie de la biologie |
ED : | Organicism; Development; Morphogenesis; Autonomy; Organism; Philosophy of biology |
SD : | Filosofía de la biología |
LO : | INIST-24533.354000194100190060 |
ID : | 11-0401858 |
Links to Exploration step
Francis:11-0401858Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Becoming Organisms: The Organisation of Development and the Development of Organisation</title>
<author><name sortKey="Nuno De La Rosa, Laura" sort="Nuno De La Rosa, Laura" uniqKey="Nuno De La Rosa L" first="Laura" last="Nuno De La Rosa">Laura Nuno De La Rosa</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Departamento de Filosofía I (Universidad Complutense de Madrid) and IHPST (Université Paris 1-Sorbonne) 13, rue du Four</s1>
<s2>75006 Paris</s2>
<s3>FRA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">11-0401858</idno>
<date when="2010">2010</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">FRANCIS 11-0401858 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Francis:11-0401858</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">002196</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Becoming Organisms: The Organisation of Development and the Development of Organisation</title>
<author><name sortKey="Nuno De La Rosa, Laura" sort="Nuno De La Rosa, Laura" uniqKey="Nuno De La Rosa L" first="Laura" last="Nuno De La Rosa">Laura Nuno De La Rosa</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Departamento de Filosofía I (Universidad Complutense de Madrid) and IHPST (Université Paris 1-Sorbonne) 13, rue du Four</s1>
<s2>75006 Paris</s2>
<s3>FRA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">History and philosophy of the life sciences</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Hist. philos. life sci.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0391-9714</idno>
<imprint><date when="2010">2010</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">History and philosophy of the life sciences</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Hist. philos. life sci.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0391-9714</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Autonomy</term>
<term>Development</term>
<term>Morphogenesis</term>
<term>Organicism</term>
<term>Organism</term>
<term>Philosophy of biology</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Organicisme</term>
<term>Développement</term>
<term>Morphogenèse</term>
<term>Autonomie</term>
<term>Organisme</term>
<term>Intégration fonctionnelle</term>
<term>Philosophie de la biologie</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Despite the radical importance of embryology in the development of organicism, developmental biology remams philosophically underexplored as a theoretical and empirical resource to clarify the nature of organisms. This paper discusses how embryology can help develop the organisational definition of the organism as a differentiated, functionally integrated, and autonomous system. I distinguish two conceptions of development in the organisational tradition that yield two different conceptions of the organism: the life-history view claims that organisms can be considered as such during their whole ontogeny; the constitutive view distinguishes two periods in the life history, a period of generation and a period of self-maintenance of a constitutive organisation. Arguing in favour of the constitutive view, it will be claimed that the organisational criteria for the definition of organism (i.e., differentiation, functional integration, and autonomy) can only be applied to the developmental system when it has entered the period of self-maintenance of a constitutive organisation. Under the light of current research in developmental biology, it is possible to make explicit how organisms come to be as organisms. To this end, I explore key ontogenetic events that help us clarify the core aspects of animal organisation and allow us to identify the developmental stage that marks the ontological transition between an organism in potency and an organism in actuality. The structure of this ontogenetic unfolding parallels the conceptual structure of the very notion of organism; the generation of the being of a particular organism parallels its definition.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0391-9714</s0>
</fA01>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>Hist. philos. life sci.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>32</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>2-3</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Becoming Organisms: The Organisation of Development and the Development of Organisation</s1>
</fA08>
<fA09 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>The Concept of Organism: Historical, Philosophical, Scientific Perspectives</s1>
</fA09>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>NUNO DE LA ROSA (Laura)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA12 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>HUNEMAN (Philippe)</s1>
<s9>ed.</s9>
</fA12>
<fA12 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>WOLFE (Charles T.)</s1>
<s9>ed.</s9>
</fA12>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>Departamento de Filosofía I (Universidad Complutense de Madrid) and IHPST (Université Paris 1-Sorbonne) 13, rue du Four</s1>
<s2>75006 Paris</s2>
<s3>FRA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA15 i1="01"><s1>Institut d'Histoire et de Philosophie des Sciences et des Techniques, CNRS / Université Paris I Sorbonne, IHPST 13, rue du Four</s1>
<s2>75006 Paris</s2>
<s3>FRA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</fA15>
<fA15 i1="02"><s1>Unit for History and Philosophy of Science, University of Sydney, 437 Carslaw F07</s1>
<s2>Sydney, NSW 2006</s2>
<s3>AUS</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</fA15>
<fA20><s1>289-315</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>2010</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>24533</s2>
<s5>354000194100190060</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2011 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>3 p.1/4</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>11-0401858</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>History and philosophy of the life sciences</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>ITA</s0>
</fA66>
<fA68 i1="01" i2="1" l="FRE"><s1>Organismes en devenir : organisation du développement et développement de l'organisation</s1>
</fA68>
<fA69 i1="01" i2="1" l="FRE"><s1>Le concept d'organisme : perspectives historiques, philosophiques et scientifiques</s1>
</fA69>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>Despite the radical importance of embryology in the development of organicism, developmental biology remams philosophically underexplored as a theoretical and empirical resource to clarify the nature of organisms. This paper discusses how embryology can help develop the organisational definition of the organism as a differentiated, functionally integrated, and autonomous system. I distinguish two conceptions of development in the organisational tradition that yield two different conceptions of the organism: the life-history view claims that organisms can be considered as such during their whole ontogeny; the constitutive view distinguishes two periods in the life history, a period of generation and a period of self-maintenance of a constitutive organisation. Arguing in favour of the constitutive view, it will be claimed that the organisational criteria for the definition of organism (i.e., differentiation, functional integration, and autonomy) can only be applied to the developmental system when it has entered the period of self-maintenance of a constitutive organisation. Under the light of current research in developmental biology, it is possible to make explicit how organisms come to be as organisms. To this end, I explore key ontogenetic events that help us clarify the core aspects of animal organisation and allow us to identify the developmental stage that marks the ontological transition between an organism in potency and an organism in actuality. The structure of this ontogenetic unfolding parallels the conceptual structure of the very notion of organism; the generation of the being of a particular organism parallels its definition.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="T"><s0>52240</s0>
<s1>I</s1>
</fC02>
<fC02 i1="02" i2="T"><s0>522360</s0>
<s1>VI</s1>
</fC02>
<fC02 i1="03" i2="T"><s0>522</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="P" l="FRE"><s0>Organicisme</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="P" l="ENG"><s0>Organicism</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="P" l="FRE"><s0>Développement</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="P" l="ENG"><s0>Development</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="P" l="FRE"><s0>Morphogenèse</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="P" l="ENG"><s0>Morphogenesis</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="P" l="FRE"><s0>Autonomie</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="P" l="ENG"><s0>Autonomy</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="P" l="FRE"><s0>Organisme</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="P" l="ENG"><s0>Organism</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="T" l="FRE"><s0>Intégration fonctionnelle</s0>
<s4>INC</s4>
<s5>31</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="T" l="FRE"><s0>Philosophie de la biologie</s0>
<s4>CD</s4>
<s5>96</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="T" l="ENG"><s0>Philosophy of biology</s0>
<s4>CD</s4>
<s5>96</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="T" l="SPA"><s0>Filosofía de la biología</s0>
<s4>CD</s4>
<s5>96</s5>
</fC03>
<fN21><s1>276</s1>
</fN21>
</pA>
</standard>
<server><NO>FRANCIS 11-0401858 INIST</NO>
<FT>(Organismes en devenir : organisation du développement et développement de l'organisation)</FT>
<ET>Becoming Organisms: The Organisation of Development and the Development of Organisation</ET>
<AU>NUNO DE LA ROSA (Laura); HUNEMAN (Philippe); WOLFE (Charles T.)</AU>
<AF>Departamento de Filosofía I (Universidad Complutense de Madrid) and IHPST (Université Paris 1-Sorbonne) 13, rue du Four/75006 Paris/France (1 aut.); Institut d'Histoire et de Philosophie des Sciences et des Techniques, CNRS / Université Paris I Sorbonne, IHPST 13, rue du Four/75006 Paris/France (1 aut.); Unit for History and Philosophy of Science, University of Sydney, 437 Carslaw F07/Sydney, NSW 2006/Australie (2 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>History and philosophy of the life sciences; ISSN 0391-9714; Italie; Da. 2010; Vol. 32; No. 2-3; Pp. 289-315; Bibl. 3 p.1/4</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>Despite the radical importance of embryology in the development of organicism, developmental biology remams philosophically underexplored as a theoretical and empirical resource to clarify the nature of organisms. This paper discusses how embryology can help develop the organisational definition of the organism as a differentiated, functionally integrated, and autonomous system. I distinguish two conceptions of development in the organisational tradition that yield two different conceptions of the organism: the life-history view claims that organisms can be considered as such during their whole ontogeny; the constitutive view distinguishes two periods in the life history, a period of generation and a period of self-maintenance of a constitutive organisation. Arguing in favour of the constitutive view, it will be claimed that the organisational criteria for the definition of organism (i.e., differentiation, functional integration, and autonomy) can only be applied to the developmental system when it has entered the period of self-maintenance of a constitutive organisation. Under the light of current research in developmental biology, it is possible to make explicit how organisms come to be as organisms. To this end, I explore key ontogenetic events that help us clarify the core aspects of animal organisation and allow us to identify the developmental stage that marks the ontological transition between an organism in potency and an organism in actuality. The structure of this ontogenetic unfolding parallels the conceptual structure of the very notion of organism; the generation of the being of a particular organism parallels its definition.</EA>
<CC>52240; 522360; 522</CC>
<FD>Organicisme; Développement; Morphogenèse; Autonomie; Organisme; Intégration fonctionnelle; Philosophie de la biologie</FD>
<ED>Organicism; Development; Morphogenesis; Autonomy; Organism; Philosophy of biology</ED>
<SD>Filosofía de la biología</SD>
<LO>INIST-24533.354000194100190060</LO>
<ID>11-0401858</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Asie/explor/AustralieFrV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002196 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 002196 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Asie |area= AustralieFrV1 |flux= PascalFrancis |étape= Corpus |type= RBID |clé= Francis:11-0401858 |texte= Becoming Organisms: The Organisation of Development and the Development of Organisation }}
This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |