Spatial sampling on streams: principles for inference on aquatic networks
Identifieur interne : 003D70 ( Main/Merge ); précédent : 003D69; suivant : 003D71Spatial sampling on streams: principles for inference on aquatic networks
Auteurs : Nicholas A. Som [États-Unis] ; Pascal Monestiez [France] ; Jay M. Ver Hoef [États-Unis] ; Dale L. Zimmerman [États-Unis] ; Erin E. Peterson [Australie]Source :
- Environmetrics [ 1180-4009 ] ; 2014-08.
Abstract
For ecological and environmental data, prior inquiries into spatial sampling designs have considered two‐dimensional domains and have shown that design optimality depends on the characteristics of the target spatial domain and intended inference. The structure and water‐driven continuity of streams prompted the development of spatial autocovariance models for stream networks. The unique properties of stream networks, and their spatial processes, warrant evaluation of sampling design characteristics in comparison with their two‐dimensional counterparts. Common inference scenarios in stream networks include spatial prediction, estimation of fixed effects parameters, and estimation of autocovariance parameters, with prediction and fixed effects estimation most commonly coupled with autocovariance parameter estimation. We consider these inference scenarios under a suite of network characteristics and stream‐network spatial processes. Our results demonstrate, for parameter estimation and prediction, the importance of collecting samples from specific network locations. Additionally, our results mirror aspects from the prior two‐dimensional sampling design inquiries, namely, the importance of collecting some samples within clusters when autocovariance parameter estimation is required. These results can be applied to help refine sample site selection for future studies and further showcase that understanding the characteristics of the targeted spatial domain is essential for sampling design planning. Published 2014. This article has been contributed to by US Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.
Url:
DOI: 10.1002/env.2284
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 002A81
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: 002A81
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: 000043
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:E3A33EC32098216458729EFAAB2B2C90EEB80DAELe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Spatial sampling on streams: principles for inference on aquatic networks</title>
<author><name sortKey="Som, Nicholas A" sort="Som, Nicholas A" uniqKey="Som N" first="Nicholas A." last="Som">Nicholas A. Som</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Monestiez, Pascal" sort="Monestiez, Pascal" uniqKey="Monestiez P" first="Pascal" last="Monestiez">Pascal Monestiez</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Ver Hoef, Jay M" sort="Ver Hoef, Jay M" uniqKey="Ver Hoef J" first="Jay M." last="Ver Hoef">Jay M. Ver Hoef</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Zimmerman, Dale L" sort="Zimmerman, Dale L" uniqKey="Zimmerman D" first="Dale L." last="Zimmerman">Dale L. Zimmerman</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Peterson, Erin E" sort="Peterson, Erin E" uniqKey="Peterson E" first="Erin E." last="Peterson">Erin E. Peterson</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:E3A33EC32098216458729EFAAB2B2C90EEB80DAE</idno>
<date when="2014" year="2014">2014</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1002/env.2284</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/E3A33EC32098216458729EFAAB2B2C90EEB80DAE/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">002A81</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">002A81</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">002A81</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">000043</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000043</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">1180-4009:2014:Som N:spatial:sampling:on</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">003D70</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Spatial sampling on streams: principles for inference on aquatic networks</title>
<author><name sortKey="Som, Nicholas A" sort="Som, Nicholas A" uniqKey="Som N" first="Nicholas A." last="Som">Nicholas A. Som</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>US Fish & Wildlife Service, Arcata FWO, CA, Arcata</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Arcata</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
<affiliation></affiliation>
<affiliation></affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Monestiez, Pascal" sort="Monestiez, Pascal" uniqKey="Monestiez P" first="Pascal" last="Monestiez">Pascal Monestiez</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="3"><country xml:lang="fr">France</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Biostatistique et Processus Spatiaux, INRA, Avignon</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName><region type="region">Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur</region>
<region type="old region">Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur</region>
<settlement type="city">Avignon</settlement>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Ver Hoef, Jay M" sort="Ver Hoef, Jay M" uniqKey="Ver Hoef J" first="Jay M." last="Ver Hoef">Jay M. Ver Hoef</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>National Marine Mammal Laboratory, NOAA Fisheries, WA, Seattle</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Seattle</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Zimmerman, Dale L" sort="Zimmerman, Dale L" uniqKey="Zimmerman D" first="Dale L." last="Zimmerman">Dale L. Zimmerman</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="4"><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Iowa, IA, Iowa City</wicri:regionArea>
<orgName type="university">Université de l'Iowa</orgName>
<placeName><settlement type="city">Iowa City</settlement>
<region type="state">Iowa</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Peterson, Erin E" sort="Peterson, Erin E" uniqKey="Peterson E" first="Erin E." last="Peterson">Erin E. Peterson</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Australie</country>
<wicri:regionArea>CSIRO Computational Informatics, Dutton Park, QLD</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>QLD</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Environmetrics</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">ENVIRONMETRICS</title>
<idno type="ISSN">1180-4009</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1099-095X</idno>
<imprint><biblScope unit="vol">25</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">5</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="306">306</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="323">323</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">18</biblScope>
<date type="published" when="2014-08">2014-08</date>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">1180-4009</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1180-4009</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass></textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract">For ecological and environmental data, prior inquiries into spatial sampling designs have considered two‐dimensional domains and have shown that design optimality depends on the characteristics of the target spatial domain and intended inference. The structure and water‐driven continuity of streams prompted the development of spatial autocovariance models for stream networks. The unique properties of stream networks, and their spatial processes, warrant evaluation of sampling design characteristics in comparison with their two‐dimensional counterparts. Common inference scenarios in stream networks include spatial prediction, estimation of fixed effects parameters, and estimation of autocovariance parameters, with prediction and fixed effects estimation most commonly coupled with autocovariance parameter estimation. We consider these inference scenarios under a suite of network characteristics and stream‐network spatial processes. Our results demonstrate, for parameter estimation and prediction, the importance of collecting samples from specific network locations. Additionally, our results mirror aspects from the prior two‐dimensional sampling design inquiries, namely, the importance of collecting some samples within clusters when autocovariance parameter estimation is required. These results can be applied to help refine sample site selection for future studies and further showcase that understanding the characteristics of the targeted spatial domain is essential for sampling design planning. Published 2014. This article has been contributed to by US Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Asie/explor/AustralieFrV1/Data/Main/Merge
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003D70 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Merge/biblio.hfd -nk 003D70 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Asie |area= AustralieFrV1 |flux= Main |étape= Merge |type= RBID |clé= ISTEX:E3A33EC32098216458729EFAAB2B2C90EEB80DAE |texte= Spatial sampling on streams: principles for inference on aquatic networks }}
![]() | This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. | ![]() |