Synergy in Urban Regeneration Partnerships: Property Agents' Perspectives
Identifieur interne : 002D46 ( Istex/Curation ); précédent : 002D45; suivant : 002D47Synergy in Urban Regeneration Partnerships: Property Agents' Perspectives
Auteurs : Michael Ball [Royaume-Uni] ; Laurent Le Ny [France] ; Paul J. MaginnSource :
- Urban studies (Harlow. Print) [ 0042-0980 ] ; 2003-10.
Descripteurs français
- Wicri :
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Analytical generalisations, Audit commission, Case study area, Community consultation, Community involvement, Community participation, Community politics, Community power, Complex structures, Consultant, Cost overruns, Developer, Enthusiast, Excessive bureaucracy, Extensive experience, Extra costs, Governance, Greater london authority, Hastings, Individual agents, Interviewee, Limited number, Local authorities, Local authority, Local communities, Michael ball, Much community consultation, Multiagency partnerships, National strategy, Neighbourhood renewal, Normal distribution, Organisation, Other developers, Other words, Overall terms, Partnership, Partnership model, Partnership process, Partnership processes, Pessimistic critics, Planning process, Policy debate, Policy synergy, Pragmatic critics, Pragmatist, Pragmatist position, Private agents, Private developer, Private developers, Private redevelopment schemes, Private sector, Problematic issue, Programme, Property agent types, Property agents, Property consultants, Property developers, Property development, Property research, Property world, Public sector, Regeneration, Regeneration partnerships, Regeneration process, Regeneration programmes, Regeneration schemes, Regional property markets, Resource synergy, Response rate, Sample selection, Social housing institutions, Specialist advice, Strategic vision, Stronger leadership, Synergistic, Synergy, Urban policy, Urban regeneration, Urban regeneration partnerships, Urban studies, Urps.
- Teeft :
- Analytical generalisations, Audit commission, Case study area, Community consultation, Community involvement, Community participation, Community politics, Community power, Complex structures, Consultant, Cost overruns, Developer, Enthusiast, Excessive bureaucracy, Extensive experience, Extra costs, Governance, Greater london authority, Hastings, Individual agents, Interviewee, Limited number, Local authorities, Local authority, Local communities, Michael ball, Much community consultation, Multiagency partnerships, National strategy, Neighbourhood renewal, Normal distribution, Organisation, Other developers, Other words, Overall terms, Partnership, Partnership model, Partnership process, Partnership processes, Pessimistic critics, Planning process, Policy debate, Policy synergy, Pragmatic critics, Pragmatist, Pragmatist position, Private agents, Private developer, Private developers, Private redevelopment schemes, Private sector, Problematic issue, Programme, Property agent types, Property agents, Property consultants, Property developers, Property development, Property research, Property world, Public sector, Regeneration, Regeneration partnerships, Regeneration process, Regeneration programmes, Regeneration schemes, Regional property markets, Resource synergy, Response rate, Sample selection, Social housing institutions, Specialist advice, Strategic vision, Stronger leadership, Synergistic, Synergy, Urban policy, Urban regeneration, Urban regeneration partnerships, Urban studies, Urps.
Abstract
A major justification for urban regeneration partnerships (URPs) is that they provide synergistic benefits for their participants. Some argue that the major beneficiaries will be private-sector agencies. This proposition is examined in the light of evidence from a survey of property-related agencies. The opinions of developers and property consultants on the success of the partnership process in regeneration schemes with a significant property redevelopment component are examined. Many were found to have concerns about the URP model, centring on governance structures, decision-making, cost implications and time-frames. This suggests that synergy benefits may not actually exist. It is concluded that management and decision-making structures in partnerships need to be of greater concern in policy debate than is currently the case.
Url:
DOI: 10.1080/0042098032000123277
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :002D46
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:F15C0EE5324184B2D3A5EBA02B0698731D9FABD6Curation
No country items
Paul J. Maginn<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Centre for Social Research, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup Campus, 100 Joondalup Drive, Joondalup, Western Australia 6027</mods:affiliation>
<wicri:noCountry code="subField">6027</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Synergy in Urban Regeneration Partnerships: Property Agents' Perspectives</title>
<author wicri:is="90%"><name sortKey="Ball, Michael" sort="Ball, Michael" uniqKey="Ball M" first="Michael" last="Ball">Michael Ball</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Real Estate and Planning, University of Reading, Whiteknights, PO Box 217, Reading, RG6 6AH, UK,</mods:affiliation>
<wicri:noCountry code="subField"></wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>E-mail: M.Ball@readireg.ac.uk</mods:affiliation>
<country wicri:rule="url">Royaume-Uni</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author wicri:is="90%"><name sortKey="Le Ny, Laurent" sort="Le Ny, Laurent" uniqKey="Le Ny L" first="Laurent" last="Le Ny">Laurent Le Ny</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Chargé de Mission INTERREG, Conseil Général de l'Aisne, Rue Paul Doumer, 02013 Laon Cedex, France</mods:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">France</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Chargé de Mission INTERREG, Conseil Général de l'Aisne, Rue Paul Doumer, 02013 Laon Cedex</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author wicri:is="90%"><name sortKey="Maginn, Paul J" sort="Maginn, Paul J" uniqKey="Maginn P" first="Paul J." last="Maginn">Paul J. Maginn</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Centre for Social Research, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup Campus, 100 Joondalup Drive, Joondalup, Western Australia 6027</mods:affiliation>
<wicri:noCountry code="subField">6027</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:F15C0EE5324184B2D3A5EBA02B0698731D9FABD6</idno>
<date when="2003" year="2003">2003</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1080/0042098032000123277</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/F15C0EE5324184B2D3A5EBA02B0698731D9FABD6/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">002D46</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">002D46</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">002D46</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Synergy in Urban Regeneration Partnerships: Property Agents' Perspectives</title>
<author wicri:is="90%"><name sortKey="Ball, Michael" sort="Ball, Michael" uniqKey="Ball M" first="Michael" last="Ball">Michael Ball</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Real Estate and Planning, University of Reading, Whiteknights, PO Box 217, Reading, RG6 6AH, UK,</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>E-mail: M.Ball@readireg.ac.uk</mods:affiliation>
<country wicri:rule="url">Royaume-Uni</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author wicri:is="90%"><name sortKey="Le Ny, Laurent" sort="Le Ny, Laurent" uniqKey="Le Ny L" first="Laurent" last="Le Ny">Laurent Le Ny</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Chargé de Mission INTERREG, Conseil Général de l'Aisne, Rue Paul Doumer, 02013 Laon Cedex, France</mods:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">France</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Chargé de Mission INTERREG, Conseil Général de l'Aisne, Rue Paul Doumer, 02013 Laon Cedex</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author wicri:is="90%"><name sortKey="Maginn, Paul J" sort="Maginn, Paul J" uniqKey="Maginn P" first="Paul J." last="Maginn">Paul J. Maginn</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Centre for Social Research, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup Campus, 100 Joondalup Drive, Joondalup, Western Australia 6027</mods:affiliation>
<wicri:noCountry code="subField">6027</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series><title level="j">Urban studies (Harlow. Print)</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0042-0980</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1360-063X</idno>
<imprint><publisher>Sage Publications</publisher>
<pubPlace>Sage UK: London, England</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2003-10">2003-10</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">40</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">11</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="2239">2239</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="2253">2253</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0042-0980</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0042-0980</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Analytical generalisations</term>
<term>Audit commission</term>
<term>Case study area</term>
<term>Community consultation</term>
<term>Community involvement</term>
<term>Community participation</term>
<term>Community politics</term>
<term>Community power</term>
<term>Complex structures</term>
<term>Consultant</term>
<term>Cost overruns</term>
<term>Developer</term>
<term>Enthusiast</term>
<term>Excessive bureaucracy</term>
<term>Extensive experience</term>
<term>Extra costs</term>
<term>Governance</term>
<term>Greater london authority</term>
<term>Hastings</term>
<term>Individual agents</term>
<term>Interviewee</term>
<term>Limited number</term>
<term>Local authorities</term>
<term>Local authority</term>
<term>Local communities</term>
<term>Michael ball</term>
<term>Much community consultation</term>
<term>Multiagency partnerships</term>
<term>National strategy</term>
<term>Neighbourhood renewal</term>
<term>Normal distribution</term>
<term>Organisation</term>
<term>Other developers</term>
<term>Other words</term>
<term>Overall terms</term>
<term>Partnership</term>
<term>Partnership model</term>
<term>Partnership process</term>
<term>Partnership processes</term>
<term>Pessimistic critics</term>
<term>Planning process</term>
<term>Policy debate</term>
<term>Policy synergy</term>
<term>Pragmatic critics</term>
<term>Pragmatist</term>
<term>Pragmatist position</term>
<term>Private agents</term>
<term>Private developer</term>
<term>Private developers</term>
<term>Private redevelopment schemes</term>
<term>Private sector</term>
<term>Problematic issue</term>
<term>Programme</term>
<term>Property agent types</term>
<term>Property agents</term>
<term>Property consultants</term>
<term>Property developers</term>
<term>Property development</term>
<term>Property research</term>
<term>Property world</term>
<term>Public sector</term>
<term>Regeneration</term>
<term>Regeneration partnerships</term>
<term>Regeneration process</term>
<term>Regeneration programmes</term>
<term>Regeneration schemes</term>
<term>Regional property markets</term>
<term>Resource synergy</term>
<term>Response rate</term>
<term>Sample selection</term>
<term>Social housing institutions</term>
<term>Specialist advice</term>
<term>Strategic vision</term>
<term>Stronger leadership</term>
<term>Synergistic</term>
<term>Synergy</term>
<term>Urban policy</term>
<term>Urban regeneration</term>
<term>Urban regeneration partnerships</term>
<term>Urban studies</term>
<term>Urps</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Analytical generalisations</term>
<term>Audit commission</term>
<term>Case study area</term>
<term>Community consultation</term>
<term>Community involvement</term>
<term>Community participation</term>
<term>Community politics</term>
<term>Community power</term>
<term>Complex structures</term>
<term>Consultant</term>
<term>Cost overruns</term>
<term>Developer</term>
<term>Enthusiast</term>
<term>Excessive bureaucracy</term>
<term>Extensive experience</term>
<term>Extra costs</term>
<term>Governance</term>
<term>Greater london authority</term>
<term>Hastings</term>
<term>Individual agents</term>
<term>Interviewee</term>
<term>Limited number</term>
<term>Local authorities</term>
<term>Local authority</term>
<term>Local communities</term>
<term>Michael ball</term>
<term>Much community consultation</term>
<term>Multiagency partnerships</term>
<term>National strategy</term>
<term>Neighbourhood renewal</term>
<term>Normal distribution</term>
<term>Organisation</term>
<term>Other developers</term>
<term>Other words</term>
<term>Overall terms</term>
<term>Partnership</term>
<term>Partnership model</term>
<term>Partnership process</term>
<term>Partnership processes</term>
<term>Pessimistic critics</term>
<term>Planning process</term>
<term>Policy debate</term>
<term>Policy synergy</term>
<term>Pragmatic critics</term>
<term>Pragmatist</term>
<term>Pragmatist position</term>
<term>Private agents</term>
<term>Private developer</term>
<term>Private developers</term>
<term>Private redevelopment schemes</term>
<term>Private sector</term>
<term>Problematic issue</term>
<term>Programme</term>
<term>Property agent types</term>
<term>Property agents</term>
<term>Property consultants</term>
<term>Property developers</term>
<term>Property development</term>
<term>Property research</term>
<term>Property world</term>
<term>Public sector</term>
<term>Regeneration</term>
<term>Regeneration partnerships</term>
<term>Regeneration process</term>
<term>Regeneration programmes</term>
<term>Regeneration schemes</term>
<term>Regional property markets</term>
<term>Resource synergy</term>
<term>Response rate</term>
<term>Sample selection</term>
<term>Social housing institutions</term>
<term>Specialist advice</term>
<term>Strategic vision</term>
<term>Stronger leadership</term>
<term>Synergistic</term>
<term>Synergy</term>
<term>Urban policy</term>
<term>Urban regeneration</term>
<term>Urban regeneration partnerships</term>
<term>Urban studies</term>
<term>Urps</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Gouvernance</term>
<term>Collectivité locale</term>
<term>Société</term>
<term>Société de personnes</term>
<term>Entreprise privée</term>
<term>Promotion immobilière</term>
<term>Entreprise publique</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<langUsage><language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">A major justification for urban regeneration partnerships (URPs) is that they provide synergistic benefits for their participants. Some argue that the major beneficiaries will be private-sector agencies. This proposition is examined in the light of evidence from a survey of property-related agencies. The opinions of developers and property consultants on the success of the partnership process in regeneration schemes with a significant property redevelopment component are examined. Many were found to have concerns about the URP model, centring on governance structures, decision-making, cost implications and time-frames. This suggests that synergy benefits may not actually exist. It is concluded that management and decision-making structures in partnerships need to be of greater concern in policy debate than is currently the case.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Asie/explor/AustralieFrV1/Data/Istex/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002D46 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 002D46 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Asie |area= AustralieFrV1 |flux= Istex |étape= Curation |type= RBID |clé= ISTEX:F15C0EE5324184B2D3A5EBA02B0698731D9FABD6 |texte= Synergy in Urban Regeneration Partnerships: Property Agents' Perspectives }}
![]() | This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. | ![]() |