Serveur d'exploration sur les relations entre la France et l'Australie

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Synergy in Urban Regeneration Partnerships: Property Agents' Perspectives

Identifieur interne : 002D46 ( Istex/Curation ); précédent : 002D45; suivant : 002D47

Synergy in Urban Regeneration Partnerships: Property Agents' Perspectives

Auteurs : Michael Ball [Royaume-Uni] ; Laurent Le Ny [France] ; Paul J. Maginn

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:F15C0EE5324184B2D3A5EBA02B0698731D9FABD6

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

A major justification for urban regeneration partnerships (URPs) is that they provide synergistic benefits for their participants. Some argue that the major beneficiaries will be private-sector agencies. This proposition is examined in the light of evidence from a survey of property-related agencies. The opinions of developers and property consultants on the success of the partnership process in regeneration schemes with a significant property redevelopment component are examined. Many were found to have concerns about the URP model, centring on governance structures, decision-making, cost implications and time-frames. This suggests that synergy benefits may not actually exist. It is concluded that management and decision-making structures in partnerships need to be of greater concern in policy debate than is currently the case.

Url:
DOI: 10.1080/0042098032000123277

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Links to Exploration step

ISTEX:F15C0EE5324184B2D3A5EBA02B0698731D9FABD6

Curation

No country items

Paul J. Maginn
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Centre for Social Research, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup Campus, 100 Joondalup Drive, Joondalup, Western Australia 6027</mods:affiliation>
<wicri:noCountry code="subField">6027</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Synergy in Urban Regeneration Partnerships: Property Agents' Perspectives</title>
<author wicri:is="90%">
<name sortKey="Ball, Michael" sort="Ball, Michael" uniqKey="Ball M" first="Michael" last="Ball">Michael Ball</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Department of Real Estate and Planning, University of Reading, Whiteknights, PO Box 217, Reading, RG6 6AH, UK,</mods:affiliation>
<wicri:noCountry code="subField"></wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<mods:affiliation>E-mail: M.Ball@readireg.ac.uk</mods:affiliation>
<country wicri:rule="url">Royaume-Uni</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author wicri:is="90%">
<name sortKey="Le Ny, Laurent" sort="Le Ny, Laurent" uniqKey="Le Ny L" first="Laurent" last="Le Ny">Laurent Le Ny</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<mods:affiliation>Chargé de Mission INTERREG, Conseil Général de l'Aisne, Rue Paul Doumer, 02013 Laon Cedex, France</mods:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">France</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Chargé de Mission INTERREG, Conseil Général de l'Aisne, Rue Paul Doumer, 02013 Laon Cedex</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author wicri:is="90%">
<name sortKey="Maginn, Paul J" sort="Maginn, Paul J" uniqKey="Maginn P" first="Paul J." last="Maginn">Paul J. Maginn</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Centre for Social Research, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup Campus, 100 Joondalup Drive, Joondalup, Western Australia 6027</mods:affiliation>
<wicri:noCountry code="subField">6027</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:F15C0EE5324184B2D3A5EBA02B0698731D9FABD6</idno>
<date when="2003" year="2003">2003</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1080/0042098032000123277</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/F15C0EE5324184B2D3A5EBA02B0698731D9FABD6/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">002D46</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">002D46</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">002D46</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Synergy in Urban Regeneration Partnerships: Property Agents' Perspectives</title>
<author wicri:is="90%">
<name sortKey="Ball, Michael" sort="Ball, Michael" uniqKey="Ball M" first="Michael" last="Ball">Michael Ball</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Department of Real Estate and Planning, University of Reading, Whiteknights, PO Box 217, Reading, RG6 6AH, UK,</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<mods:affiliation>E-mail: M.Ball@readireg.ac.uk</mods:affiliation>
<country wicri:rule="url">Royaume-Uni</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author wicri:is="90%">
<name sortKey="Le Ny, Laurent" sort="Le Ny, Laurent" uniqKey="Le Ny L" first="Laurent" last="Le Ny">Laurent Le Ny</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<mods:affiliation>Chargé de Mission INTERREG, Conseil Général de l'Aisne, Rue Paul Doumer, 02013 Laon Cedex, France</mods:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">France</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Chargé de Mission INTERREG, Conseil Général de l'Aisne, Rue Paul Doumer, 02013 Laon Cedex</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author wicri:is="90%">
<name sortKey="Maginn, Paul J" sort="Maginn, Paul J" uniqKey="Maginn P" first="Paul J." last="Maginn">Paul J. Maginn</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Centre for Social Research, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup Campus, 100 Joondalup Drive, Joondalup, Western Australia 6027</mods:affiliation>
<wicri:noCountry code="subField">6027</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j">Urban studies (Harlow. Print)</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0042-0980</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1360-063X</idno>
<imprint>
<publisher>Sage Publications</publisher>
<pubPlace>Sage UK: London, England</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2003-10">2003-10</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">40</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">11</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="2239">2239</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="2253">2253</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0042-0980</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">0042-0980</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Analytical generalisations</term>
<term>Audit commission</term>
<term>Case study area</term>
<term>Community consultation</term>
<term>Community involvement</term>
<term>Community participation</term>
<term>Community politics</term>
<term>Community power</term>
<term>Complex structures</term>
<term>Consultant</term>
<term>Cost overruns</term>
<term>Developer</term>
<term>Enthusiast</term>
<term>Excessive bureaucracy</term>
<term>Extensive experience</term>
<term>Extra costs</term>
<term>Governance</term>
<term>Greater london authority</term>
<term>Hastings</term>
<term>Individual agents</term>
<term>Interviewee</term>
<term>Limited number</term>
<term>Local authorities</term>
<term>Local authority</term>
<term>Local communities</term>
<term>Michael ball</term>
<term>Much community consultation</term>
<term>Multiagency partnerships</term>
<term>National strategy</term>
<term>Neighbourhood renewal</term>
<term>Normal distribution</term>
<term>Organisation</term>
<term>Other developers</term>
<term>Other words</term>
<term>Overall terms</term>
<term>Partnership</term>
<term>Partnership model</term>
<term>Partnership process</term>
<term>Partnership processes</term>
<term>Pessimistic critics</term>
<term>Planning process</term>
<term>Policy debate</term>
<term>Policy synergy</term>
<term>Pragmatic critics</term>
<term>Pragmatist</term>
<term>Pragmatist position</term>
<term>Private agents</term>
<term>Private developer</term>
<term>Private developers</term>
<term>Private redevelopment schemes</term>
<term>Private sector</term>
<term>Problematic issue</term>
<term>Programme</term>
<term>Property agent types</term>
<term>Property agents</term>
<term>Property consultants</term>
<term>Property developers</term>
<term>Property development</term>
<term>Property research</term>
<term>Property world</term>
<term>Public sector</term>
<term>Regeneration</term>
<term>Regeneration partnerships</term>
<term>Regeneration process</term>
<term>Regeneration programmes</term>
<term>Regeneration schemes</term>
<term>Regional property markets</term>
<term>Resource synergy</term>
<term>Response rate</term>
<term>Sample selection</term>
<term>Social housing institutions</term>
<term>Specialist advice</term>
<term>Strategic vision</term>
<term>Stronger leadership</term>
<term>Synergistic</term>
<term>Synergy</term>
<term>Urban policy</term>
<term>Urban regeneration</term>
<term>Urban regeneration partnerships</term>
<term>Urban studies</term>
<term>Urps</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en">
<term>Analytical generalisations</term>
<term>Audit commission</term>
<term>Case study area</term>
<term>Community consultation</term>
<term>Community involvement</term>
<term>Community participation</term>
<term>Community politics</term>
<term>Community power</term>
<term>Complex structures</term>
<term>Consultant</term>
<term>Cost overruns</term>
<term>Developer</term>
<term>Enthusiast</term>
<term>Excessive bureaucracy</term>
<term>Extensive experience</term>
<term>Extra costs</term>
<term>Governance</term>
<term>Greater london authority</term>
<term>Hastings</term>
<term>Individual agents</term>
<term>Interviewee</term>
<term>Limited number</term>
<term>Local authorities</term>
<term>Local authority</term>
<term>Local communities</term>
<term>Michael ball</term>
<term>Much community consultation</term>
<term>Multiagency partnerships</term>
<term>National strategy</term>
<term>Neighbourhood renewal</term>
<term>Normal distribution</term>
<term>Organisation</term>
<term>Other developers</term>
<term>Other words</term>
<term>Overall terms</term>
<term>Partnership</term>
<term>Partnership model</term>
<term>Partnership process</term>
<term>Partnership processes</term>
<term>Pessimistic critics</term>
<term>Planning process</term>
<term>Policy debate</term>
<term>Policy synergy</term>
<term>Pragmatic critics</term>
<term>Pragmatist</term>
<term>Pragmatist position</term>
<term>Private agents</term>
<term>Private developer</term>
<term>Private developers</term>
<term>Private redevelopment schemes</term>
<term>Private sector</term>
<term>Problematic issue</term>
<term>Programme</term>
<term>Property agent types</term>
<term>Property agents</term>
<term>Property consultants</term>
<term>Property developers</term>
<term>Property development</term>
<term>Property research</term>
<term>Property world</term>
<term>Public sector</term>
<term>Regeneration</term>
<term>Regeneration partnerships</term>
<term>Regeneration process</term>
<term>Regeneration programmes</term>
<term>Regeneration schemes</term>
<term>Regional property markets</term>
<term>Resource synergy</term>
<term>Response rate</term>
<term>Sample selection</term>
<term>Social housing institutions</term>
<term>Specialist advice</term>
<term>Strategic vision</term>
<term>Stronger leadership</term>
<term>Synergistic</term>
<term>Synergy</term>
<term>Urban policy</term>
<term>Urban regeneration</term>
<term>Urban regeneration partnerships</term>
<term>Urban studies</term>
<term>Urps</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Gouvernance</term>
<term>Collectivité locale</term>
<term>Société</term>
<term>Société de personnes</term>
<term>Entreprise privée</term>
<term>Promotion immobilière</term>
<term>Entreprise publique</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<langUsage>
<language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">A major justification for urban regeneration partnerships (URPs) is that they provide synergistic benefits for their participants. Some argue that the major beneficiaries will be private-sector agencies. This proposition is examined in the light of evidence from a survey of property-related agencies. The opinions of developers and property consultants on the success of the partnership process in regeneration schemes with a significant property redevelopment component are examined. Many were found to have concerns about the URP model, centring on governance structures, decision-making, cost implications and time-frames. This suggests that synergy benefits may not actually exist. It is concluded that management and decision-making structures in partnerships need to be of greater concern in policy debate than is currently the case.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Asie/explor/AustralieFrV1/Data/Istex/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002D46 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 002D46 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Asie
   |area=    AustralieFrV1
   |flux=    Istex
   |étape=   Curation
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:F15C0EE5324184B2D3A5EBA02B0698731D9FABD6
   |texte=   Synergy in Urban Regeneration Partnerships: Property Agents' Perspectives
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33.
Data generation: Tue Dec 5 10:43:12 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 5 14:07:20 2024