STANDARDIZED GENERAL-PURPOSE NOISE REACTION QUESTIONS FOR COMMUNITY NOISE SURVEYS: RESEARCH AND A RECOMMENDATION

STANDARDIZED GENERAL-PURPOSE NOISE REACTION QUESTIONS FOR COMMUNITY NOISE SURVEYS: RESEARCH AND A RECOMMENDATION

Source :

• Journal of Sound and Vibration [ 0022-460X ] ; 2001.

Descripteurs français

• Wicri :
  • topic : Bruit, Niveau sonore, Protocole, Enquête sociale.

English descriptors

• KwdEn :
  • 2douze derniers mois2, Absolutamente nada, Academic press, Acoustical, Acoustical society, Aircraft noise, Aircraft noise annoyance, Amikor otthon tartozkodik, Analysis techniques, Annoyance, Annoyance continuum, Annoyance questions, Annoyance scale, Answer cards, Answer scale, Answer scales, Best word, Binary, Binary question, Bipolar, Bipolar scale, Candidate words, Category scale, Cent interval, Cent point, Choices scale, Committee members, Community noise reaction surveys, Community noise surveys, Community response, Comparable questions, Comparison questions, Criterion, Dono teido nayamasareru, Echnical report, Empirical data, Empirical research, Empirical studies, Empirical study, Endpoint, English results, English version, English words, Environmental noise, Erande kudasai, Exact wording, Expert judgment, Faion dont, Fidell, General response, Getsu kurai2, Great britain, Hier, Hier thuis, High annoyance, Hvor plaget, Ibration, Ibration committee, Icben, Icben team, Identical questions, Ihnen denken, Indirect questions, Insgesamt gestort oder belastigt, Intensity criterion, Intensity score, Intensity scores, International commission, Internationale standardisierungsbestrebungen, Interviewer, Investigator judgment, Kanjiru nara, Long list, Lowest point, Measurement errors, Middle alternative, Middle point, Molestia producida, Much television, Native speakers, Ndings, Negative pole, Negative problem, Negative reaction, Negative reactions, Negative scale points, Nihon university, Niversity, Noise, Noise annoyance, Noise annoyance questions, Noise annoyance scales, Noise annoyance surveys, Noise events, Noise exposure, Noise impact, Noise level, Noise levels, Noise reaction question, Noise reaction questions, Noise research, Noise source, Noise sources, Noise survey, Noise surveys, Noise team, Numeric, Numeric scale, Numeric scales, Open questions, Opinion scale, Other researchers, Overall reactions, Personal interviews, Plaget, Policy makers, Popular response category, Positive pole, Positive reactions, Preference question, Preference score, Preferred word, Previous research, Previous section, Previous studies, Previous surveys, Primary response question, Protocol, Psychological acoustics, Public health problem, Public speeches, Question wording, Questionnaire design, Railway noise, Railway survey, Rating environments, Rating questions, Reaction study results, Recommendation community response, Reliable measure, Report readers, Residential areas, Respondent, Response alternatives, Response category, Rmer basis, Road noise, Road survey, Ruhr university, Ruido producido, Scale, Scale analysis, Scale criteria, Scale point, Scale point candidacy, Scale point intensity criterion, Scale points, Screening question, Second assessment method, Section reviews, Single time, Social science research, Social survey, Social surveys, Sonic boom, Space administration, Special importance, Standard deviation, Standard wording, Standardized, Standardized noise reaction questions, Survey questions, Telephone interviews, Transportation noise, Unipolar, Unipolar scale, Unipolar scales, Upper scale point, Verbal answer scale, Verbal scale, Voldsomt plaget, Wording, Yano.
• Teeft :
  • 2douze derniers mois2, Absolutamente nada, Academic press, Acoustical, Acoustical society, Aircraft noise, Aircraft noise annoyance, Amikor otthon tartozkodik, Analysis techniques, Annoyance, Annoyance continuum, Annoyance questions, Annoyance scale, Answer cards, Answer scale, Answer scales, Best word, Binary, Binary question, Bipolar, Bipolar scale, Candidate words, Category scale, Cent interval, Cent point, Choices scale, Committee members, Community noise reaction surveys, Community noise surveys, Community response, Comparable questions, Comparison questions, Criterion, Dono teido nayamasareru, Echnical report, Empirical data, Empirical research, Empirical studies, Empirical study, Endpoint, English results, English version, English words, Environmental noise, Erande kudasai, Exact wording, Expert judgment, Faion dont, Fidell, General response, Getsu kurai2, Great britain, Hier, Hier thuis, High annoyance, Hvor plaget, Ibration, Ibration committee, Icben, Icben team, Identical questions, Ihnen denken, Indirect questions, Insgesamt gestort oder belastigt, Intensity criterion, Intensity score, Intensity scores, International commission, Internationale standardisierungsbestrebungen, Interviewer, Investigator judgment, Kanjiru nara, Long list, Lowest point, Measurement errors, Middle alternative, Middle point, Molestia producida, Much television, Native speakers, Ndings, Negative pole, Negative problem, Negative reaction, Negative reactions, Negative scale points, Nihon university, Niversity, Noise, Noise annoyance, Noise annoyance questions, Noise annoyance scales, Noise annoyance surveys, Noise events, Noise exposure, Noise impact, Noise level, Noise levels, Noise reaction question, Noise reaction questions, Noise research, Noise source, Noise sources, Noise survey, Noise surveys, Noise team, Numeric, Numeric scale, Numeric scales, Open questions, Opinion scale, Other researchers, Overall reactions, Personal interviews, Plaget, Policy makers, Popular response category, Positive pole, Positive reactions, Preference question, Preference score, Preferred word, Previous research, Previous section, Previous studies, Previous surveys, Primary response question, Protocol, Psychological acoustics, Public health problem, Public speeches, Question wording, Questionnaire design, Railway noise, Railway survey, Rating environments, Rating questions, Reaction study results, Recommendation community response, Reliable measure, Report readers, Residential areas, Respondent, Response alternatives, Response category, Rmer basis, Road noise, Road survey, Ruhr university, Ruido producido, Scale, Scale analysis, Scale criteria, Scale point, Scale point candidacy, Scale point intensity criterion, Scale points, Screening question, Second assessment method, Section reviews, Single time, Social science research, Social survey, Social surveys, Sonic boom, Space administration, Special importance, Standard deviation, Standard wording, Standardized, Standardized noise reaction questions, Survey questions, Telephone interviews, Transportation noise, Unipolar, Unipolar scale, Unipolar scales, Upper scale point, Verbal answer scale, Verbal scale, Voldsomt plaget, Wording, Yano.

Abstract

• https://api.istex.fr/document/6FC47003F5751869CE256F9CEBD3653D44906A7B/fulltext/pdf

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)

• to stream Istex, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :001499

Links to Exploration step

Curation

No country items

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Asie/explor/AustralieFrV1/Data/Istex/Curation

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001499 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 001499 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Asie
   |area=    AustralieFrV1
   |flux=    Istex
   |étape=   Curation
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:6FC47003F5751869CE256F9CEBD3653D44906A7B
   |texte=   STANDARDIZED GENERAL-PURPOSE NOISE REACTION QUESTIONS FOR COMMUNITY NOISE SURVEYS: RESEARCH AND A RECOMMENDATION
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. Data generation: Tue Dec 5 10:43:12 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 5 14:07:20 2024