A comparative study of techniques used for porous membrane characterization: pore characterization
Identifieur interne : 000B20 ( Istex/Curation ); précédent : 000B19; suivant : 000B21A comparative study of techniques used for porous membrane characterization: pore characterization
Auteurs : K. J. Kim [Australie] ; A. G. Fane [Australie] ; R. Ben Aim [France] ; M. G. Liu [France] ; G. Jonsson [Danemark] ; I. C. Tessaro [Danemark] ; A. P. Broek [Pays-Bas] ; D. Bargeman [Pays-Bas]Source :
- Journal of Membrane Science [ 0376-7388 ] ; 1994.
Descripteurs français
- Wicri :
- topic : étude comparative.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Academic press, Active pore number, Alcohol mixture, Apparent rejection, Asymmetric ultrafiltration membranes, Biliquid, Biliquid permporometry, Calorimetric measurements, Cellulose acetate membranes, Chemical engineering, Comparative study, Concentration polarization, Dextran, Different manufacturers, Different solutes, Fesem micrographs, Fraction permeability, Image analysis, Large pores, Mass transfer coefficient, Membrane, Membrane processes, Membrane science, Membrane surfaces, Microporous membranes, Molecular weight, Mwco, Mwco determination, Mwco method, Mwco values, Nominal mwco values, Permporometry, Plenum press, Polysulfone, Polysulfone membranes, Pore, Pore characterization, Pore diameter, Pore diameters, Pore dimension, Pore length, Pore numbers, Pore radius, Pore size, Pore size distribution, Pore sizes, Pore volume, Pore volume distribution curves, Pthk, Regenerated, Regenerated cellulose, Regenerated cellulose membrane, Regenerated cellulose membranes, Rejection characteristics, Same batch, Same types, Scanning rate, Separation characteristics, Skin layer, Small pores, Solute, Steady state, Surface characterization, Surface skin dimension, Technical university, Thermogram, Thermoporometry, Thermoporometry measures, Transmembrane pressure, True rejection, Ultrafiltration, Ultrafiltration membranes, Ymloo pthk.
- Teeft :
- Academic press, Active pore number, Alcohol mixture, Apparent rejection, Asymmetric ultrafiltration membranes, Biliquid, Biliquid permporometry, Calorimetric measurements, Cellulose acetate membranes, Chemical engineering, Comparative study, Concentration polarization, Dextran, Different manufacturers, Different solutes, Fesem micrographs, Fraction permeability, Image analysis, Large pores, Mass transfer coefficient, Membrane, Membrane processes, Membrane science, Membrane surfaces, Microporous membranes, Molecular weight, Mwco, Mwco determination, Mwco method, Mwco values, Nominal mwco values, Permporometry, Plenum press, Polysulfone, Polysulfone membranes, Pore, Pore characterization, Pore diameter, Pore diameters, Pore dimension, Pore length, Pore numbers, Pore radius, Pore size, Pore size distribution, Pore sizes, Pore volume, Pore volume distribution curves, Pthk, Regenerated, Regenerated cellulose, Regenerated cellulose membrane, Regenerated cellulose membranes, Rejection characteristics, Same batch, Same types, Scanning rate, Separation characteristics, Skin layer, Small pores, Solute, Steady state, Surface characterization, Surface skin dimension, Technical university, Thermogram, Thermoporometry, Thermoporometry measures, Transmembrane pressure, True rejection, Ultrafiltration, Ultrafiltration membranes, Ymloo pthk.
Abstract
Abstract: A range of commerical UF membranes have been characterized by thermoporometry, biliquid permporometry and molecular weight cut-off experiments. A comparison of results from these three independent techniques for the same types of membrane shows an indication of the strength and weakness of the methods. MWCO values determined from actual rejection values using PEG and dextran were significantly lower than the manufacturer supplied data. The data obtained using the biliquid permporometry and solute rejection tests produced contrasting results for Amicon polysulfone (PM30) and regenerated cellulose (YM30) membranes. While MWCO determination resulted in sharper cut-off curves, the biliquid permporometry offered a broader size distribution with the PM30 and vice versa with the YM30. The pore sizes obtained by thermoporometry were significantly larger than those by the biliquid permporometry. The biliquid permporometry and thermoporometry give significantly higher values than the MWCO method. The closest comparison is obtained between the EM values and the MWCO method. This suggests that the controlling pore dimension for separation is the surface skin dimension.
Url:
DOI: 10.1016/0376-7388(93)E0044-E
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000B20
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:3BD2B463AA83D7E3531E72C311FF74F91F86B5C7Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title>A comparative study of techniques used for porous membrane characterization: pore characterization</title><author><name sortKey="Kim, K J" sort="Kim, K J" uniqKey="Kim K" first="K. J." last="Kim">K. J. Kim</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Centre for Membrane Science and Technology, School of Chemical Engineering and Industrial Chemistry, University of New South Wales, P.O. Box 1, Kensington, N.S.W. 2033 Australia</mods:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Australie</country><wicri:regionArea>Centre for Membrane Science and Technology, School of Chemical Engineering and Industrial Chemistry, University of New South Wales, P.O. Box 1, Kensington</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Fane, A G" sort="Fane, A G" uniqKey="Fane A" first="A. G." last="Fane">A. G. Fane</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>To whom correspondence should be addressed.</mods:affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="no comma">To whom correspondence should be addressed.</wicri:noCountry></affiliation><affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Centre for Membrane Science and Technology, School of Chemical Engineering and Industrial Chemistry, University of New South Wales, P.O. Box 1, Kensington, N.S.W. 2033 Australia</mods:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Australie</country><wicri:regionArea>Centre for Membrane Science and Technology, School of Chemical Engineering and Industrial Chemistry, University of New South Wales, P.O. Box 1, Kensington</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ben Aim, R" sort="Ben Aim, R" uniqKey="Ben Aim R" first="R." last="Ben Aim">R. Ben Aim</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Department de Genie Chimique, Université de Technologie de Compiègne, BP649-60206 Compiègne France</mods:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">France</country><wicri:regionArea>Department de Genie Chimique, Université de Technologie de Compiègne</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Liu, M G" sort="Liu, M G" uniqKey="Liu M" first="M. G." last="Liu">M. G. Liu</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Department de Genie Chimique, Université de Technologie de Compiègne, BP649-60206 Compiègne France</mods:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">France</country><wicri:regionArea>Department de Genie Chimique, Université de Technologie de Compiègne</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Jonsson, G" sort="Jonsson, G" uniqKey="Jonsson G" first="G." last="Jonsson">G. Jonsson</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Department of Chemical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Building 229, DK2800 Lyngby Denmark</mods:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Danemark</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Chemical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Building 229</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Tessaro, I C" sort="Tessaro, I C" uniqKey="Tessaro I" first="I. C." last="Tessaro">I. C. Tessaro</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Department of Chemical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Building 229, DK2800 Lyngby Denmark</mods:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Danemark</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Chemical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Building 229</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Broek, A P" sort="Broek, A P" uniqKey="Broek A" first="A. P." last="Broek">A. P. Broek</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Department de Chemical Technology, Twente University of Technology, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede Netherlands</mods:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Pays-Bas</country><wicri:regionArea>Department de Chemical Technology, Twente University of Technology, P.O. Box 217</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Bargeman, D" sort="Bargeman, D" uniqKey="Bargeman D" first="D." last="Bargeman">D. Bargeman</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Department de Chemical Technology, Twente University of Technology, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede Netherlands</mods:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Pays-Bas</country><wicri:regionArea>Department de Chemical Technology, Twente University of Technology, P.O. Box 217</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:3BD2B463AA83D7E3531E72C311FF74F91F86B5C7</idno><date when="1994" year="1994">1994</date><idno type="doi">10.1016/0376-7388(93)E0044-E</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/3BD2B463AA83D7E3531E72C311FF74F91F86B5C7/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000B20</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000B20</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">000B20</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a">A comparative study of techniques used for porous membrane characterization: pore characterization</title><author><name sortKey="Kim, K J" sort="Kim, K J" uniqKey="Kim K" first="K. J." last="Kim">K. J. Kim</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Centre for Membrane Science and Technology, School of Chemical Engineering and Industrial Chemistry, University of New South Wales, P.O. Box 1, Kensington, N.S.W. 2033 Australia</mods:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Australie</country><wicri:regionArea>Centre for Membrane Science and Technology, School of Chemical Engineering and Industrial Chemistry, University of New South Wales, P.O. Box 1, Kensington</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Fane, A G" sort="Fane, A G" uniqKey="Fane A" first="A. G." last="Fane">A. G. Fane</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>To whom correspondence should be addressed.</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Centre for Membrane Science and Technology, School of Chemical Engineering and Industrial Chemistry, University of New South Wales, P.O. Box 1, Kensington, N.S.W. 2033 Australia</mods:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Australie</country><wicri:regionArea>Centre for Membrane Science and Technology, School of Chemical Engineering and Industrial Chemistry, University of New South Wales, P.O. Box 1, Kensington</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ben Aim, R" sort="Ben Aim, R" uniqKey="Ben Aim R" first="R." last="Ben Aim">R. Ben Aim</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Department de Genie Chimique, Université de Technologie de Compiègne, BP649-60206 Compiègne France</mods:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">France</country><wicri:regionArea>Department de Genie Chimique, Université de Technologie de Compiègne</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Liu, M G" sort="Liu, M G" uniqKey="Liu M" first="M. G." last="Liu">M. G. Liu</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Department de Genie Chimique, Université de Technologie de Compiègne, BP649-60206 Compiègne France</mods:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">France</country><wicri:regionArea>Department de Genie Chimique, Université de Technologie de Compiègne</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Jonsson, G" sort="Jonsson, G" uniqKey="Jonsson G" first="G." last="Jonsson">G. Jonsson</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Department of Chemical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Building 229, DK2800 Lyngby Denmark</mods:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Danemark</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Chemical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Building 229</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Tessaro, I C" sort="Tessaro, I C" uniqKey="Tessaro I" first="I. C." last="Tessaro">I. C. Tessaro</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Department of Chemical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Building 229, DK2800 Lyngby Denmark</mods:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Danemark</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Chemical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Building 229</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Broek, A P" sort="Broek, A P" uniqKey="Broek A" first="A. P." last="Broek">A. P. Broek</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Department de Chemical Technology, Twente University of Technology, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede Netherlands</mods:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Pays-Bas</country><wicri:regionArea>Department de Chemical Technology, Twente University of Technology, P.O. Box 217</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Bargeman, D" sort="Bargeman, D" uniqKey="Bargeman D" first="D." last="Bargeman">D. Bargeman</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Department de Chemical Technology, Twente University of Technology, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede Netherlands</mods:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Pays-Bas</country><wicri:regionArea>Department de Chemical Technology, Twente University of Technology, P.O. Box 217</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Journal of Membrane Science</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">MEMSCI</title><idno type="ISSN">0376-7388</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="1994">1994</date><biblScope unit="volume">87</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1–2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="35">35</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="46">46</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0376-7388</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0376-7388</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Academic press</term><term>Active pore number</term><term>Alcohol mixture</term><term>Apparent rejection</term><term>Asymmetric ultrafiltration membranes</term><term>Biliquid</term><term>Biliquid permporometry</term><term>Calorimetric measurements</term><term>Cellulose acetate membranes</term><term>Chemical engineering</term><term>Comparative study</term><term>Concentration polarization</term><term>Dextran</term><term>Different manufacturers</term><term>Different solutes</term><term>Fesem micrographs</term><term>Fraction permeability</term><term>Image analysis</term><term>Large pores</term><term>Mass transfer coefficient</term><term>Membrane</term><term>Membrane processes</term><term>Membrane science</term><term>Membrane surfaces</term><term>Microporous membranes</term><term>Molecular weight</term><term>Mwco</term><term>Mwco determination</term><term>Mwco method</term><term>Mwco values</term><term>Nominal mwco values</term><term>Permporometry</term><term>Plenum press</term><term>Polysulfone</term><term>Polysulfone membranes</term><term>Pore</term><term>Pore characterization</term><term>Pore diameter</term><term>Pore diameters</term><term>Pore dimension</term><term>Pore length</term><term>Pore numbers</term><term>Pore radius</term><term>Pore size</term><term>Pore size distribution</term><term>Pore sizes</term><term>Pore volume</term><term>Pore volume distribution curves</term><term>Pthk</term><term>Regenerated</term><term>Regenerated cellulose</term><term>Regenerated cellulose membrane</term><term>Regenerated cellulose membranes</term><term>Rejection characteristics</term><term>Same batch</term><term>Same types</term><term>Scanning rate</term><term>Separation characteristics</term><term>Skin layer</term><term>Small pores</term><term>Solute</term><term>Steady state</term><term>Surface characterization</term><term>Surface skin dimension</term><term>Technical university</term><term>Thermogram</term><term>Thermoporometry</term><term>Thermoporometry measures</term><term>Transmembrane pressure</term><term>True rejection</term><term>Ultrafiltration</term><term>Ultrafiltration membranes</term><term>Ymloo pthk</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Academic press</term><term>Active pore number</term><term>Alcohol mixture</term><term>Apparent rejection</term><term>Asymmetric ultrafiltration membranes</term><term>Biliquid</term><term>Biliquid permporometry</term><term>Calorimetric measurements</term><term>Cellulose acetate membranes</term><term>Chemical engineering</term><term>Comparative study</term><term>Concentration polarization</term><term>Dextran</term><term>Different manufacturers</term><term>Different solutes</term><term>Fesem micrographs</term><term>Fraction permeability</term><term>Image analysis</term><term>Large pores</term><term>Mass transfer coefficient</term><term>Membrane</term><term>Membrane processes</term><term>Membrane science</term><term>Membrane surfaces</term><term>Microporous membranes</term><term>Molecular weight</term><term>Mwco</term><term>Mwco determination</term><term>Mwco method</term><term>Mwco values</term><term>Nominal mwco values</term><term>Permporometry</term><term>Plenum press</term><term>Polysulfone</term><term>Polysulfone membranes</term><term>Pore</term><term>Pore characterization</term><term>Pore diameter</term><term>Pore diameters</term><term>Pore dimension</term><term>Pore length</term><term>Pore numbers</term><term>Pore radius</term><term>Pore size</term><term>Pore size distribution</term><term>Pore sizes</term><term>Pore volume</term><term>Pore volume distribution curves</term><term>Pthk</term><term>Regenerated</term><term>Regenerated cellulose</term><term>Regenerated cellulose membrane</term><term>Regenerated cellulose membranes</term><term>Rejection characteristics</term><term>Same batch</term><term>Same types</term><term>Scanning rate</term><term>Separation characteristics</term><term>Skin layer</term><term>Small pores</term><term>Solute</term><term>Steady state</term><term>Surface characterization</term><term>Surface skin dimension</term><term>Technical university</term><term>Thermogram</term><term>Thermoporometry</term><term>Thermoporometry measures</term><term>Transmembrane pressure</term><term>True rejection</term><term>Ultrafiltration</term><term>Ultrafiltration membranes</term><term>Ymloo pthk</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr"><term>étude comparative</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Abstract: A range of commerical UF membranes have been characterized by thermoporometry, biliquid permporometry and molecular weight cut-off experiments. A comparison of results from these three independent techniques for the same types of membrane shows an indication of the strength and weakness of the methods. MWCO values determined from actual rejection values using PEG and dextran were significantly lower than the manufacturer supplied data. The data obtained using the biliquid permporometry and solute rejection tests produced contrasting results for Amicon polysulfone (PM30) and regenerated cellulose (YM30) membranes. While MWCO determination resulted in sharper cut-off curves, the biliquid permporometry offered a broader size distribution with the PM30 and vice versa with the YM30. The pore sizes obtained by thermoporometry were significantly larger than those by the biliquid permporometry. The biliquid permporometry and thermoporometry give significantly higher values than the MWCO method. The closest comparison is obtained between the EM values and the MWCO method. This suggests that the controlling pore dimension for separation is the surface skin dimension.</div></front></TEI></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Asie/explor/AustralieFrV1/Data/Istex/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000B20 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 000B20 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Asie
|area= AustralieFrV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Curation
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:3BD2B463AA83D7E3531E72C311FF74F91F86B5C7
|texte= A comparative study of techniques used for porous membrane characterization: pore characterization
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |