Effects of semantic variables on the subject—verb agreement processes in writing
Identifieur interne : 000188 ( Main/Corpus ); précédent : 000187; suivant : 000189Effects of semantic variables on the subject—verb agreement processes in writing
Auteurs : Michel Hupet ; Michel Fayol ; Marie-Anne SchelstraeteSource :
- British Journal of Psychology [ 0007-1269 ] ; 1998-02.
Abstract
Two experiments are reported in which participants were orally presented with French sentences that they were required to write down. In a single‐task condition, only single sentences were presented and the written recall concerned only these sentences. In a dual‐task condition, a second task was added: to memorize an additional list of words or to do mental addition while writing down the sentences. The experimental sentences were all of the type ‘Prep. + N1 + verb + subject’ (e.g. Dans les trains passe le controleur, Along the trains comes the inspector) in which the preverbal noun constituted either a plausible or an implausible subject for the verb following. Results showed that: (a) number agreement was more likely to be correct when the preverbal noun was implausible as the subject of the sentence, (b) but when they had to transcribe sentences with an implausible preverbal noun, the participants' performance at a concurrent task was poorer. These two findings indicate that the plausibility of the subject role of the preverbal noun provides information that can be used to control the procedures which underlie the construction of the agreement.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1998.tb02673.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:40C32BD0DC8359A9F8C9F9080779E3AF87181880Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Effects of semantic variables on the subject—verb agreement processes in writing</title><author><name sortKey="Hupet, Michel" sort="Hupet, Michel" uniqKey="Hupet M" first="Michel" last="Hupet">Michel Hupet</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Louvain, Department of Experimental Psychology, 10, Place C. Mercier, B 1348 Louvain La Neuve, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Fayol, Michel" sort="Fayol, Michel" uniqKey="Fayol M" first="Michel" last="Fayol">Michel Fayol</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Bourgogne, Dijon, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Schelstraete, Marie Nne" sort="Schelstraete, Marie Nne" uniqKey="Schelstraete M" first="Marie-Anne" last="Schelstraete">Marie-Anne Schelstraete</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Louvain, Louvain La Neuve, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:40C32BD0DC8359A9F8C9F9080779E3AF87181880</idno><date when="1998" year="1998">1998</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.2044-8295.1998.tb02673.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/40C32BD0DC8359A9F8C9F9080779E3AF87181880/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">000188</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000188</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Effects of semantic variables on the subject—verb agreement processes in writing</title><author><name sortKey="Hupet, Michel" sort="Hupet, Michel" uniqKey="Hupet M" first="Michel" last="Hupet">Michel Hupet</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Louvain, Department of Experimental Psychology, 10, Place C. Mercier, B 1348 Louvain La Neuve, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Fayol, Michel" sort="Fayol, Michel" uniqKey="Fayol M" first="Michel" last="Fayol">Michel Fayol</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Bourgogne, Dijon, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Schelstraete, Marie Nne" sort="Schelstraete, Marie Nne" uniqKey="Schelstraete M" first="Marie-Anne" last="Schelstraete">Marie-Anne Schelstraete</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Louvain, Louvain La Neuve, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">British Journal of Psychology</title><idno type="ISSN">0007-1269</idno><idno type="eISSN">2044-8295</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1998-02">1998-02</date><biblScope unit="vol">89</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="59">59</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="75">75</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0007-1269</idno></series><idno type="istex">40C32BD0DC8359A9F8C9F9080779E3AF87181880</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.2044-8295.1998.tb02673.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">BJOP2673</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0007-1269</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Two experiments are reported in which participants were orally presented with French sentences that they were required to write down. In a single‐task condition, only single sentences were presented and the written recall concerned only these sentences. In a dual‐task condition, a second task was added: to memorize an additional list of words or to do mental addition while writing down the sentences. The experimental sentences were all of the type ‘Prep. + N1 + verb + subject’ (e.g. Dans les trains passe le controleur, Along the trains comes the inspector) in which the preverbal noun constituted either a plausible or an implausible subject for the verb following. Results showed that: (a) number agreement was more likely to be correct when the preverbal noun was implausible as the subject of the sentence, (b) but when they had to transcribe sentences with an implausible preverbal noun, the participants' performance at a concurrent task was poorer. These two findings indicate that the plausibility of the subject role of the preverbal noun provides information that can be used to control the procedures which underlie the construction of the agreement.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Michel Hupet</name><affiliations><json:string>University of Louvain, Department of Experimental Psychology, 10, Place C. Mercier, B 1348 Louvain La Neuve, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Michel Fayol</name><affiliations><json:string>University of Bourgogne, Dijon, France</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Marie‐Anne Schelstraete</name><affiliations><json:string>University of Louvain, Louvain La Neuve, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><genre><json:string>Serial article</json:string></genre><host><volume>89</volume><pages><total>17</total><last>75</last><first>59</first></pages><issn><json:string>0007-1269</json:string></issn><issue>1</issue><genre></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><title>British Journal of Psychology</title><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)2044-8295</json:string></doi></host><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><abstract>Two experiments are reported in which participants were orally presented with French sentences that they were required to write down. In a single‐task condition, only single sentences were presented and the written recall concerned only these sentences. In a dual‐task condition, a second task was added: to memorize an additional list of words or to do mental addition while writing down the sentences. The experimental sentences were all of the type ‘Prep. + N1 + verb + subject’ (e.g. Dans les trains passe le controleur, Along the trains comes the inspector) in which the preverbal noun constituted either a plausible or an implausible subject for the verb following. Results showed that: (a) number agreement was more likely to be correct when the preverbal noun was implausible as the subject of the sentence, (b) but when they had to transcribe sentences with an implausible preverbal noun, the participants' performance at a concurrent task was poorer. These two findings indicate that the plausibility of the subject role of the preverbal noun provides information that can be used to control the procedures which underlie the construction of the agreement.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>7.732</score><pdfVersion>1.4</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>504 x 719.759 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>false</refBibsNative><abstractCharCount>1166</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>8237</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>46510</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>17</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>186 </abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Effects of semantic variables on the subject—verb agreement processes in writing</title><publicationDate>1998</publicationDate><copyrightDate>1998</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.2044-8295.1998.tb02673.x</json:string></doi><id>40C32BD0DC8359A9F8C9F9080779E3AF87181880</id><fulltext><json:item><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><extension>pdf</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/40C32BD0DC8359A9F8C9F9080779E3AF87181880/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><extension>zip</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/40C32BD0DC8359A9F8C9F9080779E3AF87181880/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/40C32BD0DC8359A9F8C9F9080779E3AF87181880/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader type="text"><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Effects of semantic variables on the subject—verb agreement processes in writing</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><p>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</p></availability><date>1998</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Effects of semantic variables on the subject—verb agreement processes in writing</title><author><persName><forename type="first">Michel</forename><surname>Hupet</surname></persName><note type="correspondence"><p>Correspondence: University of Louvain, Department of Experimental Psychology, 10, Place C. Mercier, B 1348 Louvain La Neuve, Belgium</p></note><affiliation>University of Louvain, Department of Experimental Psychology, 10, Place C. Mercier, B 1348 Louvain La Neuve, Belgium</affiliation></author><author><persName><forename type="first">Michel</forename><surname>Fayol</surname></persName><affiliation>University of Bourgogne, Dijon, France</affiliation></author><author><persName><forename type="first">Marie‐Anne</forename><surname>Schelstraete</surname></persName><affiliation>University of Louvain, Louvain La Neuve, Belgium</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">British Journal of Psychology</title><idno type="pISSN">0007-1269</idno><idno type="eISSN">2044-8295</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)2044-8295</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1998-02"></date><biblScope unit="vol">89</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="59">59</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="75">75</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">40C32BD0DC8359A9F8C9F9080779E3AF87181880</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.2044-8295.1998.tb02673.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">BJOP2673</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>1998</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Two experiments are reported in which participants were orally presented with French sentences that they were required to write down. In a single‐task condition, only single sentences were presented and the written recall concerned only these sentences. In a dual‐task condition, a second task was added: to memorize an additional list of words or to do mental addition while writing down the sentences. The experimental sentences were all of the type ‘Prep. + N1 + verb + subject’ (e.g. Dans les trains passe le controleur, Along the trains comes the inspector) in which the preverbal noun constituted either a plausible or an implausible subject for the verb following. Results showed that: (a) number agreement was more likely to be correct when the preverbal noun was implausible as the subject of the sentence, (b) but when they had to transcribe sentences with an implausible preverbal noun, the participants' performance at a concurrent task was poorer. These two findings indicate that the plausibility of the subject role of the preverbal noun provides information that can be used to control the procedures which underlie the construction of the agreement.</p></abstract></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="1998-02">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><extension>txt</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/40C32BD0DC8359A9F8C9F9080779E3AF87181880/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley component found"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)2044-8295</doi><issn type="print">0007-1269</issn><issn type="electronic">2044-8295</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="BJOP"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY">British Journal of Psychology</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="02101"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/bjop.1998.89.issue-1</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="89">89</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="1">1</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="1998-02">February 1998</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="5" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.2044-8295.1998.tb02673.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="BJOP2673"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="17"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Article</title></titleGroup><copyright>1998 The British Psychological Society</copyright><eventGroup><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.4.8 mode:FullText" date="2011-04-08"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2011-04-13"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2011-04-13"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-02-27"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-15"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="59">59</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="75">75</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>University of Louvain, Department of Experimental Psychology, 10, Place C. Mercier, B 1348 Louvain La Neuve, Belgium</correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:BJOP.BJOP2673.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory>Received 18 December 1995; revised version received 30 January 1997</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="referenceTotal" number="0"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="4"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Effects of semantic variables on the subject—verb agreement processes in writing</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1" corresponding="yes"><personName><givenNames>Michel</givenNames><familyName>Hupet</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Michel</givenNames><familyName>Fayol</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a3"><personName><givenNames>Marie‐Anne</givenNames><familyName>Schelstraete</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="BE"><unparsedAffiliation>University of Louvain, Department of Experimental Psychology, 10, Place C. Mercier, B 1348 Louvain La Neuve, Belgium</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="FR"><unparsedAffiliation>University of Bourgogne, Dijon, France</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a3" countryCode="BE"><unparsedAffiliation>University of Louvain, Louvain La Neuve, Belgium</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p>Two experiments are reported in which participants were orally presented with French sentences that they were required to write down. In a single‐task condition, only single sentences were presented and the written recall concerned only these sentences. In a dual‐task condition, a second task was added: to memorize an additional list of words or to do mental addition while writing down the sentences. The experimental sentences were all of the type ‘Prep. + N1 + verb + subject’ (e.g. Dans les trains passe le controleur, Along the trains comes the inspector) in which the preverbal noun constituted either a plausible or an implausible subject for the verb following. Results showed that: (<i>a</i>) number agreement was more likely to be correct when the preverbal noun was implausible as the subject of the sentence, (<i>b</i>) but when they had to transcribe sentences with an implausible preverbal noun, the participants' performance at a concurrent task was poorer. These two findings indicate that the plausibility of the subject role of the preverbal noun provides information that can be used to control the procedures which underlie the construction of the agreement.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><!--Version 0.6 générée le 11-8-2015--><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Effects of semantic variables on the subject—verb agreement processes in writing</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Effects of semantic variables on the subject—verb agreement processes in writing</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Michel</namePart><namePart type="family">Hupet</namePart><affiliation>University of Louvain, Department of Experimental Psychology, 10, Place C. Mercier, B 1348 Louvain La Neuve, Belgium</affiliation><description>Correspondence: University of Louvain, Department of Experimental Psychology, 10, Place C. Mercier, B 1348 Louvain La Neuve, Belgium</description><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Michel</namePart><namePart type="family">Fayol</namePart><affiliation>University of Bourgogne, Dijon, France</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Marie‐Anne</namePart><namePart type="family">Schelstraete</namePart><affiliation>University of Louvain, Louvain La Neuve, Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre>Serial article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1998-02</dateIssued><edition>Received 18 December 1995; revised version received 30 January 1997</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1998</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">Two experiments are reported in which participants were orally presented with French sentences that they were required to write down. In a single‐task condition, only single sentences were presented and the written recall concerned only these sentences. In a dual‐task condition, a second task was added: to memorize an additional list of words or to do mental addition while writing down the sentences. The experimental sentences were all of the type ‘Prep. + N1 + verb + subject’ (e.g. Dans les trains passe le controleur, Along the trains comes the inspector) in which the preverbal noun constituted either a plausible or an implausible subject for the verb following. Results showed that: (a) number agreement was more likely to be correct when the preverbal noun was implausible as the subject of the sentence, (b) but when they had to transcribe sentences with an implausible preverbal noun, the participants' performance at a concurrent task was poorer. These two findings indicate that the plausibility of the subject role of the preverbal noun provides information that can be used to control the procedures which underlie the construction of the agreement.</abstract><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>British Journal of Psychology</title></titleInfo><identifier type="ISSN">0007-1269</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">2044-8295</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)2044-8295</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">BJOP</identifier><part><date>1998</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>89</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>1</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>59</start><end>75</end><total>17</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">40C32BD0DC8359A9F8C9F9080779E3AF87181880</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.2044-8295.1998.tb02673.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">BJOP2673</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">1998 The British Psychological Society</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordOrigin>WILEY</recordOrigin><recordContentSource>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordContentSource></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Wicri/explor/CircusV2/Data/Main/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000188 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000188 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Wicri
|area= CircusV2
|flux= Main
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:40C32BD0DC8359A9F8C9F9080779E3AF87181880
|texte= Effects of semantic variables on the subject—verb agreement processes in writing
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.31. |  |