Humans optimize decision-making by delaying decision onset.
Identifieur interne : 003806 ( PubMed/Curation ); précédent : 003805; suivant : 003807Humans optimize decision-making by delaying decision onset.
Auteurs : Tobias Teichert [États-Unis] ; Vincent P. Ferrera [États-Unis] ; Jack Grinband [États-Unis]Source :
- PloS one [ 1932-6203 ] ; 2014.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- MESH :
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
Abstract
Why do humans make errors on seemingly trivial perceptual decisions? It has been shown that such errors occur in part because the decision process (evidence accumulation) is initiated before selective attention has isolated the relevant sensory information from salient distractors. Nevertheless, it is typically assumed that subjects increase accuracy by prolonging the decision process rather than delaying decision onset. To date it has not been tested whether humans can strategically delay decision onset to increase response accuracy. To address this question we measured the time course of selective attention in a motion interference task using a novel variant of the response signal paradigm. Based on these measurements we estimated time-dependent drift rate and showed that subjects should in principle be able trade speed for accuracy very effectively by delaying decision onset. Using the time-dependent estimate of drift rate we show that subjects indeed delay decision onset in addition to raising response threshold when asked to stress accuracy over speed in a free reaction version of the same motion-interference task. These findings show that decision onset is a critical aspect of the decision process that can be adjusted to effectively improve decision accuracy.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089638
PubMed: 24599295
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream PubMed, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :003832
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:24599295Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Humans optimize decision-making by delaying decision onset.</title><author><name sortKey="Teichert, Tobias" sort="Teichert, Tobias" uniqKey="Teichert T" first="Tobias" last="Teichert">Tobias Teichert</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America; Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America; Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ferrera, Vincent P" sort="Ferrera, Vincent P" uniqKey="Ferrera V" first="Vincent P" last="Ferrera">Vincent P. Ferrera</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, New York</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Grinband, Jack" sort="Grinband, Jack" uniqKey="Grinband J" first="Jack" last="Grinband">Jack Grinband</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Radiology, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Radiology, Columbia University, New York, New York</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2014">2014</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:24599295</idno><idno type="pmid">24599295</idno><idno type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0089638</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">003832</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">003832</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">003806</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">003806</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Humans optimize decision-making by delaying decision onset.</title><author><name sortKey="Teichert, Tobias" sort="Teichert, Tobias" uniqKey="Teichert T" first="Tobias" last="Teichert">Tobias Teichert</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America; Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America; Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ferrera, Vincent P" sort="Ferrera, Vincent P" uniqKey="Ferrera V" first="Vincent P" last="Ferrera">Vincent P. Ferrera</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, New York</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Grinband, Jack" sort="Grinband, Jack" uniqKey="Grinband J" first="Jack" last="Grinband">Jack Grinband</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Radiology, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Radiology, Columbia University, New York, New York</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">PloS one</title><idno type="eISSN">1932-6203</idno><imprint><date when="2014" type="published">2014</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Decision Making</term><term>Discrimination (Psychology)</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Models, Psychological</term><term>Photic Stimulation</term><term>Reaction Time</term><term>Young Adult</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte</term><term>Discrimination (psychologie)</term><term>Femelle</term><term>Humains</term><term>Jeune adulte</term><term>Modèles psychologiques</term><term>Mâle</term><term>Prise de décision</term><term>Stimulation lumineuse</term><term>Temps de réaction</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Decision Making</term><term>Discrimination (Psychology)</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Models, Psychological</term><term>Photic Stimulation</term><term>Reaction Time</term><term>Young Adult</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte</term><term>Discrimination (psychologie)</term><term>Femelle</term><term>Humains</term><term>Jeune adulte</term><term>Modèles psychologiques</term><term>Mâle</term><term>Prise de décision</term><term>Stimulation lumineuse</term><term>Temps de réaction</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Why do humans make errors on seemingly trivial perceptual decisions? It has been shown that such errors occur in part because the decision process (evidence accumulation) is initiated before selective attention has isolated the relevant sensory information from salient distractors. Nevertheless, it is typically assumed that subjects increase accuracy by prolonging the decision process rather than delaying decision onset. To date it has not been tested whether humans can strategically delay decision onset to increase response accuracy. To address this question we measured the time course of selective attention in a motion interference task using a novel variant of the response signal paradigm. Based on these measurements we estimated time-dependent drift rate and showed that subjects should in principle be able trade speed for accuracy very effectively by delaying decision onset. Using the time-dependent estimate of drift rate we show that subjects indeed delay decision onset in addition to raising response threshold when asked to stress accuracy over speed in a free reaction version of the same motion-interference task. These findings show that decision onset is a critical aspect of the decision process that can be adjusted to effectively improve decision accuracy.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">24599295</PMID><DateCreated><Year>2014</Year><Month>03</Month><Day>06</Day></DateCreated><DateCompleted><Year>2015</Year><Month>01</Month><Day>05</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2016</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>25</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Electronic-eCollection"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1932-6203</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>9</Volume><Issue>3</Issue><PubDate><Year>2014</Year></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>PloS one</Title><ISOAbbreviation>PLoS ONE</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Humans optimize decision-making by delaying decision onset.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>e89638</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1371/journal.pone.0089638</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>Why do humans make errors on seemingly trivial perceptual decisions? It has been shown that such errors occur in part because the decision process (evidence accumulation) is initiated before selective attention has isolated the relevant sensory information from salient distractors. Nevertheless, it is typically assumed that subjects increase accuracy by prolonging the decision process rather than delaying decision onset. To date it has not been tested whether humans can strategically delay decision onset to increase response accuracy. To address this question we measured the time course of selective attention in a motion interference task using a novel variant of the response signal paradigm. Based on these measurements we estimated time-dependent drift rate and showed that subjects should in principle be able trade speed for accuracy very effectively by delaying decision onset. Using the time-dependent estimate of drift rate we show that subjects indeed delay decision onset in addition to raising response threshold when asked to stress accuracy over speed in a free reaction version of the same motion-interference task. These findings show that decision onset is a critical aspect of the decision process that can be adjusted to effectively improve decision accuracy.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Teichert</LastName><ForeName>Tobias</ForeName><Initials>T</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America; Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Ferrera</LastName><ForeName>Vincent P</ForeName><Initials>VP</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Grinband</LastName><ForeName>Jack</ForeName><Initials>J</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Radiology, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><GrantList CompleteYN="Y"><Grant><GrantID>P30 EY019007</GrantID><Acronym>EY</Acronym><Agency>NEI NIH HHS</Agency><Country>United States</Country></Grant></GrantList><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2014</Year><Month>03</Month><Day>05</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>PLoS One</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>101285081</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1932-6203</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><CommentsCorrectionsList><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Biol Psychol. 2000 Jan;51(2-3):173-99</RefSource><PMID Version="1">10686365</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Neural Netw. 2006 Oct;19(8):1120-36</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16945502</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>BMC Neurosci. 2007;8:38</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17562009</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Neural Comput. 2008 Apr;20(4):873-922</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18085991</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Psychol Rev. 2009 Apr;116(2):283-317</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19348543</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Neural Netw. 2010 Apr;23(3):322-33</RefSource><PMID Version="1">20080384</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Psychol Rev. 2010 Oct;117(4):1113-43</RefSource><PMID Version="1">20822291</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Vision Res. 2011 May 25;51(10):1129-36</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21396393</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Aug 16;108(33):13852-7</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21808009</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Cogn Psychol. 2011 Dec;63(4):210-38</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21964663</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Neurosci. 2012 Mar 7;32(10):3433-46</RefSource><PMID Version="1">22399766</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Neural Comput. 2012 May;24(5):1186-229</RefSource><PMID Version="1">22295983</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e37888</RefSource><PMID Version="1">22629467</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Psychol Rev. 2001 Jul;108(3):624-52</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11488380</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Neurosci. 2002 Nov 1;22(21):9475-89</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12417672</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Exp Psychol Gen. 2004 Jun;133(2):261-82</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15149253</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Psychol Rev. 2004 Oct;111(4):931-59</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15482068</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Q J Exp Psychol. 1980 Feb;32(1):3-25</RefSource><PMID Version="1">7367577</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Can J Psychol. 1980 Jun;34(2):103-12</RefSource><PMID Version="1">7448632</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1988 Aug;14(3):331-44</RefSource><PMID Version="1">2971764</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Psychol Rev. 1990 Jul;97(3):332-61</RefSource><PMID Version="1">2200075</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Vision Res. 1995 Feb;35(3):337-43</RefSource><PMID Version="1">7892729</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Vision Res. 1997 Jun;37(11):1415-27</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9205705</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Exp Brain Res. 1997 Jun;115(2):217-33</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9224851</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1998 Aug 29;353(1373):1245-55</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9770219</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2005 Aug;15(4):465-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16023853</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Vis. 2005;5(5):376-404</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16097871</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Neurophysiol. 2006 Mar;95(3):1696-717</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16339000</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Cogn Psychol. 2006 Nov;53(3):195-237</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16890214</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Psychol Rev. 2001 Jul;108(3):550-92</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11488378</PMID></CommentsCorrections></CommentsCorrectionsList><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000328" MajorTopicYN="N">Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003657" MajorTopicYN="Y">Decision Making</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D004192" MajorTopicYN="N">Discrimination (Psychology)</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008960" MajorTopicYN="N">Models, Psychological</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010775" MajorTopicYN="N">Photic Stimulation</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011930" MajorTopicYN="N">Reaction Time</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D055815" MajorTopicYN="N">Young Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList><OtherID Source="NLM">PMC3943733</OtherID></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2012</Year><Month>08</Month><Day>07</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2014</Year><Month>01</Month><Day>24</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2014</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>7</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2014</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>7</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2015</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>6</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>epublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24599295</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0089638</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">PONE-D-12-23651</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC3943733</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Amérique/explor/PittsburghV1/Data/PubMed/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003806 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 003806 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Amérique
|area= PittsburghV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Curation
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:24599295
|texte= Humans optimize decision-making by delaying decision onset.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:24599295" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a PittsburghV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.38. |  |