Changes in prolapse surgery trends relative to FDA notifications regarding vaginal mesh.
Identifieur interne : 003843 ( PubMed/Checkpoint ); précédent : 003842; suivant : 003844Changes in prolapse surgery trends relative to FDA notifications regarding vaginal mesh.
Auteurs : Laura C. Skoczylas [États-Unis] ; Lindsay C. Turner ; Li Wang ; Daniel G. Winger ; Jonathan P. ShepherdSource :
- International urogynecology journal [ 1433-3023 ] ; 2014.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- MESH :
- effets indésirables : Filet chirurgical.
- tendances : Filet chirurgical, Laparoscopie, Procédures de chirurgie gynécologique, Robotique.
- Adulte d'âge moyen, Femelle, Humains, Prolapsus d'organe pelvien, Sujet âgé, Études rétrospectives.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- adverse effects : Surgical Mesh.
- surgery : Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
- trends : Gynecologic Surgical Procedures, Laparoscopy, Robotics, Surgical Mesh.
- Aged, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies.
Abstract
In 2008 and 2011, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released notifications regarding vaginal mesh. In describing prolapse surgery trends over time, we predicted vaginal mesh use would decrease and native tissue repairs would increase.
DOI: 10.1007/s00192-013-2231-7
PubMed: 24081497
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:24081497Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Changes in prolapse surgery trends relative to FDA notifications regarding vaginal mesh.</title><author><name sortKey="Skoczylas, Laura C" sort="Skoczylas, Laura C" uniqKey="Skoczylas L" first="Laura C" last="Skoczylas">Laura C. Skoczylas</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>, Pittsburgh, PA</wicri:regionArea><placeName><region type="state">Pennsylvanie</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Turner, Lindsay C" sort="Turner, Lindsay C" uniqKey="Turner L" first="Lindsay C" last="Turner">Lindsay C. Turner</name></author><author><name sortKey="Wang, Li" sort="Wang, Li" uniqKey="Wang L" first="Li" last="Wang">Li Wang</name></author><author><name sortKey="Winger, Daniel G" sort="Winger, Daniel G" uniqKey="Winger D" first="Daniel G" last="Winger">Daniel G. Winger</name></author><author><name sortKey="Shepherd, Jonathan P" sort="Shepherd, Jonathan P" uniqKey="Shepherd J" first="Jonathan P" last="Shepherd">Jonathan P. Shepherd</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2014">2014</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:24081497</idno><idno type="pmid">24081497</idno><idno type="doi">10.1007/s00192-013-2231-7</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">003308</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">003308</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">003286</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">003286</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">003286</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Checkpoint" wicri:step="PubMed">003286</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Changes in prolapse surgery trends relative to FDA notifications regarding vaginal mesh.</title><author><name sortKey="Skoczylas, Laura C" sort="Skoczylas, Laura C" uniqKey="Skoczylas L" first="Laura C" last="Skoczylas">Laura C. Skoczylas</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>, Pittsburgh, PA</wicri:regionArea><placeName><region type="state">Pennsylvanie</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Turner, Lindsay C" sort="Turner, Lindsay C" uniqKey="Turner L" first="Lindsay C" last="Turner">Lindsay C. Turner</name></author><author><name sortKey="Wang, Li" sort="Wang, Li" uniqKey="Wang L" first="Li" last="Wang">Li Wang</name></author><author><name sortKey="Winger, Daniel G" sort="Winger, Daniel G" uniqKey="Winger D" first="Daniel G" last="Winger">Daniel G. Winger</name></author><author><name sortKey="Shepherd, Jonathan P" sort="Shepherd, Jonathan P" uniqKey="Shepherd J" first="Jonathan P" last="Shepherd">Jonathan P. Shepherd</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">International urogynecology journal</title><idno type="eISSN">1433-3023</idno><imprint><date when="2014" type="published">2014</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Aged</term><term>Female</term><term>Gynecologic Surgical Procedures (trends)</term><term>Humans</term><term>Laparoscopy (trends)</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Pelvic Organ Prolapse (surgery)</term><term>Retrospective Studies</term><term>Robotics (trends)</term><term>Surgical Mesh (adverse effects)</term><term>Surgical Mesh (trends)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term><term>Femelle</term><term>Filet chirurgical (effets indésirables)</term><term>Filet chirurgical (tendances)</term><term>Humains</term><term>Laparoscopie (tendances)</term><term>Procédures de chirurgie gynécologique (tendances)</term><term>Prolapsus d'organe pelvien ()</term><term>Robotique (tendances)</term><term>Sujet âgé</term><term>Études rétrospectives</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="adverse effects" xml:lang="en"><term>Surgical Mesh</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="effets indésirables" xml:lang="fr"><term>Filet chirurgical</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="surgery" xml:lang="en"><term>Pelvic Organ Prolapse</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="tendances" xml:lang="fr"><term>Filet chirurgical</term><term>Laparoscopie</term><term>Procédures de chirurgie gynécologique</term><term>Robotique</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="trends" xml:lang="en"><term>Gynecologic Surgical Procedures</term><term>Laparoscopy</term><term>Robotics</term><term>Surgical Mesh</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Aged</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Retrospective Studies</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term><term>Femelle</term><term>Humains</term><term>Prolapsus d'organe pelvien</term><term>Sujet âgé</term><term>Études rétrospectives</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">In 2008 and 2011, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released notifications regarding vaginal mesh. In describing prolapse surgery trends over time, we predicted vaginal mesh use would decrease and native tissue repairs would increase.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">24081497</PMID><DateCreated><Year>2014</Year><Month>03</Month><Day>25</Day></DateCreated><DateCompleted><Year>2014</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>09</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2017</Year><Month>02</Month><Day>20</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1433-3023</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>25</Volume><Issue>4</Issue><PubDate><Year>2014</Year><Month>Apr</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>International urogynecology journal</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Int Urogynecol J</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Changes in prolapse surgery trends relative to FDA notifications regarding vaginal mesh.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>471-7</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1007/s00192-013-2231-7</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText Label="INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS" NlmCategory="OBJECTIVE">In 2008 and 2011, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released notifications regarding vaginal mesh. In describing prolapse surgery trends over time, we predicted vaginal mesh use would decrease and native tissue repairs would increase.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">Operative reports were reviewed for all prolapse repairs performed from 2008 to 2011 at our large regional hospital system. The number of each type of prolapse repair was determined per quarter year and expressed as a percentage of all repairs. Surgical trends were examined focusing on changes with respect to the release of two FDA notifications. We used linear regression to analyze surgical trends and chi-square for demographic comparisons.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">One thousand two hundred and eleven women underwent 1,385 prolapse procedures. Mean age was 64 ± 12, and 70 % had stage III prolapse. Vaginal mesh procedures declined over time (p = 0.001), comprising 27 % of repairs in early 2008, 15 % at the first FDA notification, 5 % by the second FDA notification, and 2 % at the end of 2011. The percentage of native tissue anterior/posterior repairs (p < 0.001) and apical suspensions (p = 0.007) increased, whereas colpocleisis remained constant (p = 0.475). Despite an overall decrease in open sacral colpopexies (p < 0.001), an initial increase was seen around the first FDA notification. We adopted laparoscopic/robotic techniques around this time, and the percentage of minimally invasive sacral colpopexies steadily increased thereafter (p < 0.001). All sacral colpopexies combined as a group declined over time (p = 0.011).</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSIONS" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">Surgical treatment of prolapse continues to evolve. Over a 4-year period encompassing two FDA notifications regarding vaginal mesh and the introduction of laparoscopic/robotic techniques, we performed fewer vaginal mesh procedures and more native tissue repairs and minimally invasive sacral colpopexies.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Skoczylas</LastName><ForeName>Laura C</ForeName><Initials>LC</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Turner</LastName><ForeName>Lindsay C</ForeName><Initials>LC</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Wang</LastName><ForeName>Li</ForeName><Initials>L</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Winger</LastName><ForeName>Daniel G</ForeName><Initials>DG</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Shepherd</LastName><ForeName>Jonathan P</ForeName><Initials>JP</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><GrantList CompleteYN="Y"><Grant><GrantID>UL1 RR024153</GrantID><Acronym>RR</Acronym><Agency>NCRR NIH HHS</Agency><Country>United States</Country></Grant><Grant><GrantID>UL1 TR000005</GrantID><Acronym>TR</Acronym><Agency>NCATS NIH HHS</Agency><Country>United States</Country></Grant></GrantList><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D052061">Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2013</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>01</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>England</Country><MedlineTA>Int Urogynecol J</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>101567041</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0937-3462</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><CommentsCorrectionsList><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int Urogynecol J. 2012 Apr;23 Suppl 1:S7-14</RefSource><PMID Version="1">22395288</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2012 Jan-Feb;18(1):5-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">22453257</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008 Apr;19(4):473-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17925992</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int Urogynecol J. 2012 Apr;23 Suppl 1:S33-42</RefSource><PMID Version="1">22395291</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Neurourol Urodyn. 2012 Sep;31(7):1165-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">22517125</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2012 Nov-Dec;18(6):357-61</RefSource><PMID Version="1">23143431</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 May;198(5):561.e1-4</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18377864</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Nov;118(5):1005-13</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21979458</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Eur Urol. 2009 May;55(5):1235-6</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19645092</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jan;208(1):79.e1-7</RefSource><PMID Version="1">23159692</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Mar;24(3):377-84</RefSource><PMID Version="1">22864764</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Jan;206(1):86.e1-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21974992</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009;88(7):772-80</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19452293</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(4):CD004014</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15495076</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int Urogynecol J. 2012 Jan;23(1):5-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">22086260</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Feb;113(2 Pt 1):367-73</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19155908</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int Urogynecol J. 2011 Jul;22(7):789-98</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21424785</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 May;192(5):1752-8</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15902189</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008 Dec;19(12):1603-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18690402</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>JAMA. 2013 May 15;309(19):2016-24</RefSource><PMID Version="1">23677313</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Nov;120(5):1105-15</RefSource><PMID Version="1">23090529</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Obstet Gynecol. 1962 Jul;20:72-7</RefSource><PMID Version="1">14462011</PMID></CommentsCorrections></CommentsCorrectionsList><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000368" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013509" MajorTopicYN="N">Gynecologic Surgical Procedures</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000639" MajorTopicYN="Y">trends</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010535" MajorTopicYN="N">Laparoscopy</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000639" MajorTopicYN="N">trends</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D056887" MajorTopicYN="N">Pelvic Organ Prolapse</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="Y">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012189" MajorTopicYN="N">Retrospective Studies</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012371" MajorTopicYN="N">Robotics</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000639" MajorTopicYN="N">trends</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013526" MajorTopicYN="N">Surgical Mesh</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000009" MajorTopicYN="N">adverse effects</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000639" MajorTopicYN="Y">trends</QualifierName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList><OtherID Source="NLM">NIHMS583259</OtherID><OtherID Source="NLM">PMC4049448</OtherID></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2013</Year><Month>06</Month><Day>07</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2013</Year><Month>09</Month><Day>07</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2013</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>2</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2013</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>2</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2014</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>15</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24081497</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1007/s00192-013-2231-7</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC4049448</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="mid">NIHMS583259</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list><country><li>États-Unis</li></country><region><li>Pennsylvanie</li></region></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Shepherd, Jonathan P" sort="Shepherd, Jonathan P" uniqKey="Shepherd J" first="Jonathan P" last="Shepherd">Jonathan P. Shepherd</name><name sortKey="Turner, Lindsay C" sort="Turner, Lindsay C" uniqKey="Turner L" first="Lindsay C" last="Turner">Lindsay C. Turner</name><name sortKey="Wang, Li" sort="Wang, Li" uniqKey="Wang L" first="Li" last="Wang">Li Wang</name><name sortKey="Winger, Daniel G" sort="Winger, Daniel G" uniqKey="Winger D" first="Daniel G" last="Winger">Daniel G. Winger</name></noCountry><country name="États-Unis"><region name="Pennsylvanie"><name sortKey="Skoczylas, Laura C" sort="Skoczylas, Laura C" uniqKey="Skoczylas L" first="Laura C" last="Skoczylas">Laura C. Skoczylas</name></region></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Amérique/explor/PittsburghV1/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003843 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd -nk 003843 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Amérique
|area= PittsburghV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Checkpoint
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:24081497
|texte= Changes in prolapse surgery trends relative to FDA notifications regarding vaginal mesh.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:24081497" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a PittsburghV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.38. |  |