PittsburghV1, PascalFrancis, Corpus, bibRecord, 001468

Determinants of Parental Acceptance of the HINI Vaccine

Identifieur interne : 001468 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 001467; suivant : 001469

Determinants of Parental Acceptance of the HINI Vaccine

Auteurs : Karen M. Hilyard ; Sandra Crouse Quinn ; Kevin H. Kim ; Don Musa ; Vicki S. Freimuth

Source :

Health education & behavior [ 1090-1981 ] ; 2014.

RBID : Francis:14-0152877

Descripteurs français

Pascal (Inist)
- Déterminant, Parent, Acceptation, Vaccin, Prévention, Immunoprophylaxie, Théorie, Enfant, Santé publique, Urgence, Croyance, Modèle, Communication, Grippe, Monde, Facteur risque, Risque, Crise, Vaccination, Education pour la santé, Pandémie, Comportement de santé.

English descriptors

KwdEn :
- Acceptance, Belief, Child, Communication, Crisis, Determinant, Emergency, Health behavior, Health education, Immunoprophylaxis, Influenza, Models, Parent, Prevention, Public health, Risk, Risk factor, Theory, Vaccination, Vaccine, World.

Abstract

Although designated as a high-risk group during the 2009-2010 HINI pandemic, only about 40% of U.S. children received the vaccine, a relatively low percentage compared with high-risk groups in seasonal influenza, such as the elderly, whose vaccine rates typically top 70%. To better understand parental decision making and predictors of acceptance of the HINI vaccine, we examined data from a representative national sample of parents (n = 684), using the health belief model as a framework. The most important predictors of vaccine acceptance were "cues to action" at multiple levels, from intrapersonal to mass communication, including the influence of friends, family, the media, and modeling by the Obama family; costs and benefits and self-efficacy were also significant predictors of vaccine acceptance. Higher perceived levels of HINI risk were not associated with vaccine uptake. Results suggest that traditional measures of perceived risk may not account for the cost-benefit analysis inherent in vaccine decision making, and that messages designed to emphasize disease risk may be ineffective. The authors recommend emphasizing cues to action that support norming and modeling of vaccine acceptance.

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.

A01	`01`	`1`		`@0 1090-1981`
A02	`01`			`@0 HEDBFS`
A03		`1`		`@0 Health educ. behav.`
A05				`@2 41`
A06				`@2 3`
A08	`01`	`1`	`ENG`	`@1 Determinants of Parental Acceptance of the HINI Vaccine`
A11	`01`	`1`		`@1 HILYARD (Karen M.)`
A11	`02`	`1`		`@1 QUINN (Sandra Crouse)`
A11	`03`	`1`		`@1 KIM (Kevin H.)`
A11	`04`	`1`		`@1 MUSA (Don)`
A11	`05`	`1`		`@1 FREIMUTH (Vicki S.)`
A14	`01`			`@1 University of Georgia @2 Athens, GA @3 USA @Z 1 aut. @Z 5 aut.`
A14	`02`			`@1 University of Maryland @2 College Park, MD @3 USA @Z 2 aut.`
A14	`03`			`@1 University of Pittsburgh @2 Pittsburgh, PA @3 USA @Z 3 aut. @Z 4 aut.`
A20				`@1 307-314`
A21				`@1 2014`
A23	`01`			`@0 ENG`
A43	`01`			`@1 INIST @2 22026 @5 354000502732500090`
A44				`@0 0000 @1 © 2014 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.`
A45				`@0 3/4 p.`
A47	`01`	`1`		`@0 14-0152877`
A60				`@1 P`
A61				`@0 A`
A64	`01`	`1`		`@0 Health education & behavior`
A66	`01`			`@0 USA`
C01	`01`		`ENG`	@0 Although designated as a high-risk group during the 2009-2010 HINI pandemic, only about 40% of U.S. children received the vaccine, a relatively low percentage compared with high-risk groups in seasonal influenza, such as the elderly, whose vaccine rates typically top 70%. To better understand parental decision making and predictors of acceptance of the HINI vaccine, we examined data from a representative national sample of parents (n = 684), using the health belief model as a framework. The most important predictors of vaccine acceptance were "cues to action" at multiple levels, from intrapersonal to mass communication, including the influence of friends, family, the media, and modeling by the Obama family; costs and benefits and self-efficacy were also significant predictors of vaccine acceptance. Higher perceived levels of HINI risk were not associated with vaccine uptake. Results suggest that traditional measures of perceived risk may not account for the cost-benefit analysis inherent in vaccine decision making, and that messages designed to emphasize disease risk may be ineffective. The authors recommend emphasizing cues to action that support norming and modeling of vaccine acceptance.
C02	`01`	`X`		`@0 760L @1 XI`
C02	`02`	`X`		`@0 760C @1 III`
C03	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Déterminant @5 09`
C03	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Determinant @5 09`
C03	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Determinante @5 09`
C03	`02`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Parent @5 10`
C03	`02`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Parent @5 10`
C03	`02`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Pariente @5 10`
C03	`03`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Acceptation @5 11`
C03	`03`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Acceptance @5 11`
C03	`03`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Aceptación @5 11`
C03	`04`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Vaccin @5 12`
C03	`04`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Vaccine @5 12`
C03	`04`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Vacuna @5 12`
C03	`05`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Prévention @5 13`
C03	`05`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Prevention @5 13`
C03	`05`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Prevención @5 13`
C03	`06`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Immunoprophylaxie @5 14`
C03	`06`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Immunoprophylaxis @5 14`
C03	`06`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Inmunoprofilaxia @5 14`
C03	`07`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Théorie @5 15`
C03	`07`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Theory @5 15`
C03	`07`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Teoría @5 15`
C03	`08`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Enfant @5 16`
C03	`08`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Child @5 16`
C03	`08`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Niño @5 16`
C03	`09`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Santé publique @5 17`
C03	`09`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Public health @5 17`
C03	`09`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Salud pública @5 17`
C03	`10`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Urgence @5 18`
C03	`10`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Emergency @5 18`
C03	`10`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Urgencia @5 18`
C03	`11`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Croyance @5 19`
C03	`11`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Belief @5 19`
C03	`11`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Creencia @5 19`
C03	`12`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Modèle @5 20`
C03	`12`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Models @5 20`
C03	`12`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Modelo @5 20`
C03	`13`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Communication @5 21`
C03	`13`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Communication @5 21`
C03	`13`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Comunicación @5 21`
C03	`14`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Grippe @5 22`
C03	`14`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Influenza @5 22`
C03	`14`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Gripe @5 22`
C03	`15`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Monde @2 NG @5 23`
C03	`15`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 World @2 NG @5 23`
C03	`15`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Mundo @2 NG @5 23`
C03	`16`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Facteur risque @5 24`
C03	`16`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Risk factor @5 24`
C03	`16`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Factor riesgo @5 24`
C03	`17`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Risque @5 25`
C03	`17`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Risk @5 25`
C03	`17`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Riesgo @5 25`
C03	`18`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Crise @5 26`
C03	`18`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Crisis @5 26`
C03	`18`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Crisis @5 26`
C03	`19`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Vaccination @5 27`
C03	`19`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Vaccination @5 27`
C03	`19`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Vacunación @5 27`
C03	`20`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Education pour la santé @5 28`
C03	`20`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Health education @5 28`
C03	`20`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Educación sanitaria @5 28`
C03	`21`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Pandémie @4 INC @5 86`
C03	`22`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Comportement de santé @4 CD @5 96`
C03	`22`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Health behavior @4 CD @5 96`
C03	`22`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Comportamiento de salud @4 CD @5 96`
C07	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Homme`
C07	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Human`
C07	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Hombre`
C07	`02`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Virose`
C07	`02`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Viral disease`
C07	`02`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Virosis`
C07	`03`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Infection`
C07	`03`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Infection`
C07	`03`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Infección`
N21				`@1 195`
N44	`01`			`@1 OTO`
N82				`@1 OTO`

Format Inist (serveur)

NO :	FRANCIS 14-0152877 INIST
ET :	Determinants of Parental Acceptance of the HINI Vaccine
AU :	HILYARD (Karen M.); QUINN (Sandra Crouse); KIM (Kevin H.); MUSA (Don); FREIMUTH (Vicki S.)
AF :	University of Georgia/Athens, GA/Etats-Unis (1 aut., 5 aut.); University of Maryland/College Park, MD/Etats-Unis (2 aut.); University of Pittsburgh/Pittsburgh, PA/Etats-Unis (3 aut., 4 aut.)
DT :	Publication en série; Niveau analytique
SO :	Health education & behavior; ISSN 1090-1981; Coden HEDBFS; Etats-Unis; Da. 2014; Vol. 41; No. 3; Pp. 307-314; Bibl. 3/4 p.
LA :	Anglais
EA :	Although designated as a high-risk group during the 2009-2010 HINI pandemic, only about 40% of U.S. children received the vaccine, a relatively low percentage compared with high-risk groups in seasonal influenza, such as the elderly, whose vaccine rates typically top 70%. To better understand parental decision making and predictors of acceptance of the HINI vaccine, we examined data from a representative national sample of parents (n = 684), using the health belief model as a framework. The most important predictors of vaccine acceptance were "cues to action" at multiple levels, from intrapersonal to mass communication, including the influence of friends, family, the media, and modeling by the Obama family; costs and benefits and self-efficacy were also significant predictors of vaccine acceptance. Higher perceived levels of HINI risk were not associated with vaccine uptake. Results suggest that traditional measures of perceived risk may not account for the cost-benefit analysis inherent in vaccine decision making, and that messages designed to emphasize disease risk may be ineffective. The authors recommend emphasizing cues to action that support norming and modeling of vaccine acceptance.
CC :	760L; 760C
FD :	Déterminant; Parent; Acceptation; Vaccin; Prévention; Immunoprophylaxie; Théorie; Enfant; Santé publique; Urgence; Croyance; Modèle; Communication; Grippe; Monde; Facteur risque; Risque; Crise; Vaccination; Education pour la santé; Pandémie; Comportement de santé
FG :	Homme; Virose; Infection
ED :	Determinant; Parent; Acceptance; Vaccine; Prevention; Immunoprophylaxis; Theory; Child; Public health; Emergency; Belief; Models; Communication; Influenza; World; Risk factor; Risk; Crisis; Vaccination; Health education; Health behavior
EG :	Human; Viral disease; Infection
SD :	Determinante; Pariente; Aceptación; Vacuna; Prevención; Inmunoprofilaxia; Teoría; Niño; Salud pública; Urgencia; Creencia; Modelo; Comunicación; Gripe; Mundo; Factor riesgo; Riesgo; Crisis; Vacunación; Educación sanitaria; Comportamiento de salud
LO :	INIST-22026.354000502732500090
ID :	14-0152877

Links to Exploration step

Francis:14-0152877

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Determinants of Parental Acceptance of the HINI Vaccine</title>
<author><name sortKey="Hilyard, Karen M" sort="Hilyard, Karen M" uniqKey="Hilyard K" first="Karen M." last="Hilyard">Karen M. Hilyard</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>University of Georgia</s1>
<s2>Athens, GA</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Quinn, Sandra Crouse" sort="Quinn, Sandra Crouse" uniqKey="Quinn S" first="Sandra Crouse" last="Quinn">Sandra Crouse Quinn</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>University of Maryland</s1>
<s2>College Park, MD</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Kim, Kevin H" sort="Kim, Kevin H" uniqKey="Kim K" first="Kevin H." last="Kim">Kevin H. Kim</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="03"><s1>University of Pittsburgh</s1>
<s2>Pittsburgh, PA</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Musa, Don" sort="Musa, Don" uniqKey="Musa D" first="Don" last="Musa">Don Musa</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="03"><s1>University of Pittsburgh</s1>
<s2>Pittsburgh, PA</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Freimuth, Vicki S" sort="Freimuth, Vicki S" uniqKey="Freimuth V" first="Vicki S." last="Freimuth">Vicki S. Freimuth</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>University of Georgia</s1>
<s2>Athens, GA</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">14-0152877</idno>
<date when="2014">2014</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">FRANCIS 14-0152877 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Francis:14-0152877</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">001468</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Determinants of Parental Acceptance of the HINI Vaccine</title>
<author><name sortKey="Hilyard, Karen M" sort="Hilyard, Karen M" uniqKey="Hilyard K" first="Karen M." last="Hilyard">Karen M. Hilyard</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>University of Georgia</s1>
<s2>Athens, GA</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Quinn, Sandra Crouse" sort="Quinn, Sandra Crouse" uniqKey="Quinn S" first="Sandra Crouse" last="Quinn">Sandra Crouse Quinn</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>University of Maryland</s1>
<s2>College Park, MD</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Kim, Kevin H" sort="Kim, Kevin H" uniqKey="Kim K" first="Kevin H." last="Kim">Kevin H. Kim</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="03"><s1>University of Pittsburgh</s1>
<s2>Pittsburgh, PA</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Musa, Don" sort="Musa, Don" uniqKey="Musa D" first="Don" last="Musa">Don Musa</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="03"><s1>University of Pittsburgh</s1>
<s2>Pittsburgh, PA</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Freimuth, Vicki S" sort="Freimuth, Vicki S" uniqKey="Freimuth V" first="Vicki S." last="Freimuth">Vicki S. Freimuth</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>University of Georgia</s1>
<s2>Athens, GA</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Health education & behavior</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Health educ. behav.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">1090-1981</idno>
<imprint><date when="2014">2014</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Health education & behavior</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Health educ. behav.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">1090-1981</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Acceptance</term>
<term>Belief</term>
<term>Child</term>
<term>Communication</term>
<term>Crisis</term>
<term>Determinant</term>
<term>Emergency</term>
<term>Health behavior</term>
<term>Health education</term>
<term>Immunoprophylaxis</term>
<term>Influenza</term>
<term>Models</term>
<term>Parent</term>
<term>Prevention</term>
<term>Public health</term>
<term>Risk</term>
<term>Risk factor</term>
<term>Theory</term>
<term>Vaccination</term>
<term>Vaccine</term>
<term>World</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Déterminant</term>
<term>Parent</term>
<term>Acceptation</term>
<term>Vaccin</term>
<term>Prévention</term>
<term>Immunoprophylaxie</term>
<term>Théorie</term>
<term>Enfant</term>
<term>Santé publique</term>
<term>Urgence</term>
<term>Croyance</term>
<term>Modèle</term>
<term>Communication</term>
<term>Grippe</term>
<term>Monde</term>
<term>Facteur risque</term>
<term>Risque</term>
<term>Crise</term>
<term>Vaccination</term>
<term>Education pour la santé</term>
<term>Pandémie</term>
<term>Comportement de santé</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Although designated as a high-risk group during the 2009-2010 HINI pandemic, only about 40% of U.S. children received the vaccine, a relatively low percentage compared with high-risk groups in seasonal influenza, such as the elderly, whose vaccine rates typically top 70%. To better understand parental decision making and predictors of acceptance of the HINI vaccine, we examined data from a representative national sample of parents (n = 684), using the health belief model as a framework. The most important predictors of vaccine acceptance were "cues to action" at multiple levels, from intrapersonal to mass communication, including the influence of friends, family, the media, and modeling by the Obama family; costs and benefits and self-efficacy were also significant predictors of vaccine acceptance. Higher perceived levels of HINI risk were not associated with vaccine uptake. Results suggest that traditional measures of perceived risk may not account for the cost-benefit analysis inherent in vaccine decision making, and that messages designed to emphasize disease risk may be ineffective. The authors recommend emphasizing cues to action that support norming and modeling of vaccine acceptance.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>1090-1981</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01"><s0>HEDBFS</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>Health educ. behav.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>41</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>3</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Determinants of Parental Acceptance of the HINI Vaccine</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>HILYARD (Karen M.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>QUINN (Sandra Crouse)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1"><s1>KIM (Kevin H.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="04" i2="1"><s1>MUSA (Don)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="05" i2="1"><s1>FREIMUTH (Vicki S.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>University of Georgia</s1>
<s2>Athens, GA</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="02"><s1>University of Maryland</s1>
<s2>College Park, MD</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="03"><s1>University of Pittsburgh</s1>
<s2>Pittsburgh, PA</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>307-314</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>2014</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>22026</s2>
<s5>354000502732500090</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2014 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>3/4 p.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>14-0152877</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Health education & behavior</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>USA</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>Although designated as a high-risk group during the 2009-2010 HINI pandemic, only about 40% of U.S. children received the vaccine, a relatively low percentage compared with high-risk groups in seasonal influenza, such as the elderly, whose vaccine rates typically top 70%. To better understand parental decision making and predictors of acceptance of the HINI vaccine, we examined data from a representative national sample of parents (n = 684), using the health belief model as a framework. The most important predictors of vaccine acceptance were "cues to action" at multiple levels, from intrapersonal to mass communication, including the influence of friends, family, the media, and modeling by the Obama family; costs and benefits and self-efficacy were also significant predictors of vaccine acceptance. Higher perceived levels of HINI risk were not associated with vaccine uptake. Results suggest that traditional measures of perceived risk may not account for the cost-benefit analysis inherent in vaccine decision making, and that messages designed to emphasize disease risk may be ineffective. The authors recommend emphasizing cues to action that support norming and modeling of vaccine acceptance.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>760L</s0>
<s1>XI</s1>
</fC02>
<fC02 i1="02" i2="X"><s0>760C</s0>
<s1>III</s1>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Déterminant</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Determinant</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Determinante</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Parent</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Parent</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Pariente</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Acceptation</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Acceptance</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Aceptación</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Vaccin</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Vaccine</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Vacuna</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Prévention</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Prevention</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Prevención</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Immunoprophylaxie</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Immunoprophylaxis</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Inmunoprofilaxia</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Théorie</s0>
<s5>15</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Theory</s0>
<s5>15</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Teoría</s0>
<s5>15</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Enfant</s0>
<s5>16</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Child</s0>
<s5>16</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Niño</s0>
<s5>16</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Santé publique</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Public health</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Salud pública</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Urgence</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Emergency</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Urgencia</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Croyance</s0>
<s5>19</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Belief</s0>
<s5>19</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Creencia</s0>
<s5>19</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Modèle</s0>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Models</s0>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Modelo</s0>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Communication</s0>
<s5>21</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Communication</s0>
<s5>21</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Comunicación</s0>
<s5>21</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="14" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Grippe</s0>
<s5>22</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="14" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Influenza</s0>
<s5>22</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="14" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Gripe</s0>
<s5>22</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="15" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Monde</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
<s5>23</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="15" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>World</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
<s5>23</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="15" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Mundo</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
<s5>23</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="16" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Facteur risque</s0>
<s5>24</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="16" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Risk factor</s0>
<s5>24</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="16" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Factor riesgo</s0>
<s5>24</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="17" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Risque</s0>
<s5>25</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="17" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Risk</s0>
<s5>25</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="17" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Riesgo</s0>
<s5>25</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="18" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Crise</s0>
<s5>26</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="18" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Crisis</s0>
<s5>26</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="18" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Crisis</s0>
<s5>26</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="19" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Vaccination</s0>
<s5>27</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="19" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Vaccination</s0>
<s5>27</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="19" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Vacunación</s0>
<s5>27</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="20" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Education pour la santé</s0>
<s5>28</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="20" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Health education</s0>
<s5>28</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="20" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Educación sanitaria</s0>
<s5>28</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="21" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Pandémie</s0>
<s4>INC</s4>
<s5>86</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="22" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Comportement de santé</s0>
<s4>CD</s4>
<s5>96</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="22" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Health behavior</s0>
<s4>CD</s4>
<s5>96</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="22" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Comportamiento de salud</s0>
<s4>CD</s4>
<s5>96</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Homme</s0>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Human</s0>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Hombre</s0>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Virose</s0>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Viral disease</s0>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Virosis</s0>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Infection</s0>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Infection</s0>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Infección</s0>
</fC07>
<fN21><s1>195</s1>
</fN21>
<fN44 i1="01"><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN44>
<fN82><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN82>
</pA>
</standard>
<server><NO>FRANCIS 14-0152877 INIST</NO>
<ET>Determinants of Parental Acceptance of the HINI Vaccine</ET>
<AU>HILYARD (Karen M.); QUINN (Sandra Crouse); KIM (Kevin H.); MUSA (Don); FREIMUTH (Vicki S.)</AU>
<AF>University of Georgia/Athens, GA/Etats-Unis (1 aut., 5 aut.); University of Maryland/College Park, MD/Etats-Unis (2 aut.); University of Pittsburgh/Pittsburgh, PA/Etats-Unis (3 aut., 4 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Health education & behavior; ISSN 1090-1981; Coden HEDBFS; Etats-Unis; Da. 2014; Vol. 41; No. 3; Pp. 307-314; Bibl. 3/4 p.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>Although designated as a high-risk group during the 2009-2010 HINI pandemic, only about 40% of U.S. children received the vaccine, a relatively low percentage compared with high-risk groups in seasonal influenza, such as the elderly, whose vaccine rates typically top 70%. To better understand parental decision making and predictors of acceptance of the HINI vaccine, we examined data from a representative national sample of parents (n = 684), using the health belief model as a framework. The most important predictors of vaccine acceptance were "cues to action" at multiple levels, from intrapersonal to mass communication, including the influence of friends, family, the media, and modeling by the Obama family; costs and benefits and self-efficacy were also significant predictors of vaccine acceptance. Higher perceived levels of HINI risk were not associated with vaccine uptake. Results suggest that traditional measures of perceived risk may not account for the cost-benefit analysis inherent in vaccine decision making, and that messages designed to emphasize disease risk may be ineffective. The authors recommend emphasizing cues to action that support norming and modeling of vaccine acceptance.</EA>
<CC>760L; 760C</CC>
<FD>Déterminant; Parent; Acceptation; Vaccin; Prévention; Immunoprophylaxie; Théorie; Enfant; Santé publique; Urgence; Croyance; Modèle; Communication; Grippe; Monde; Facteur risque; Risque; Crise; Vaccination; Education pour la santé; Pandémie; Comportement de santé</FD>
<FG>Homme; Virose; Infection</FG>
<ED>Determinant; Parent; Acceptance; Vaccine; Prevention; Immunoprophylaxis; Theory; Child; Public health; Emergency; Belief; Models; Communication; Influenza; World; Risk factor; Risk; Crisis; Vaccination; Health education; Health behavior</ED>
<EG>Human; Viral disease; Infection</EG>
<SD>Determinante; Pariente; Aceptación; Vacuna; Prevención; Inmunoprofilaxia; Teoría; Niño; Salud pública; Urgencia; Creencia; Modelo; Comunicación; Gripe; Mundo; Factor riesgo; Riesgo; Crisis; Vacunación; Educación sanitaria; Comportamiento de salud</SD>
<LO>INIST-22026.354000502732500090</LO>
<ID>14-0152877</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Amérique/explor/PittsburghV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001468 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001468 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Amérique
   |area=    PittsburghV1
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Francis:14-0152877
   |texte=   Determinants of Parental Acceptance of the HINI Vaccine
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.38.
Data generation: Fri Jun 18 17:37:45 2021. Site generation: Fri Jun 18 18:15:47 2021

	Serveur d'exploration sur Pittsburgh
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur Pittsburgh

Determinants of Parental Acceptance of the HINI Vaccine

Determinants of Parental Acceptance of the HINI Vaccine

Source :

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Format Inist (serveur)

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri