Truth, Paradox, and Ineffable Propositions
Identifieur interne : 005C04 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 005C03; suivant : 005C05Truth, Paradox, and Ineffable Propositions
Auteurs : James R. Shaw [États-Unis]Source :
- Philosophy and Phenomenological Research [ 0031-8205 ] ; 2013-01.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Actual utterances, Ahmed, Berry paradox, Best candidate, Best candidate proposition, Certain kind, Certain properties, Certain propositions, Coherence, Coherent norms, Colloquial language, Compositional, Compositional functions, Compositional structure, Compositional tension, Compositional tensions, Compositionally, Concept horse, Conceptual ineffability, Conceptual resources, Conditional claim, Constituent expressions, Coordination failures, English words, Essential ineffabilities, Essential propositional, Essential propositional ineffabilities, Exhaustive norms, Existential claim, Existential claims, Existential form, Expressible, Expressive, Expressive failures, Expressive limitation, Expressive limitations, Expressive power, Favorite integer, Formal models, Formal theories, Formal theory, Foundational accounts, Frege, Greatest integer, Heuristic purposes, Human beings, Idealizing assumption, Imaginable circumstance, Indexical allusion, Ineffabilities, Ineffability, Ineffable, Ineffable propositions, Inexpressible, Inexpressible properties, Integer, Intelligible proposition, Intuitive sense, Kind mika, Language users, Least integer, Liar paradox, Limitation, Linguistic expression, Linguistic limitation, Linguistic resources, Linguistic technicality, Literal content, Literal expression, Literal language, Many integers, Metaphorical contents, Mika, More utterances, Natural language, Natural languages, Necessary proposition, Number mika, Other ways, Oxford university press, Paradox, Paradoxical, Paradoxical statements, Paradoxical utterances, Particular integer, Particular kind, Particular proposition, Phenomenological research, Philosophical logic, Philosophical studies, Possible worlds, Potential asymmetries, Previous section, Prime number, Problematic, Problematic utterances, Proposition, Propositional, Propositional content, Propositional contents, Propositional ineffabilities, Propositional structure, Real number, Reasoning argument, Referent, Relevant proposition, Relevant utterance, Same kind, Semantic, Semantic concepts, Semantic defect, Semantic paradox, Semantic paradoxes, Semantic properties, Semantic propositional universality, Semantic propositions, Semantic terms, Semantics, Simple bivalent proposition, Simple ways, Special explanation, Special kind, Speech acts, Strong forms, Such integer, Super referent, Theoretical satisfaction, True answer, True answers, True proposition, Truth conditions, Truth value, Truth values, Unique integer, Unthinkable propositions, Utterance, Utterances today, Wittgenstein.
- Teeft :
- Actual utterances, Ahmed, Berry paradox, Best candidate, Best candidate proposition, Certain kind, Certain properties, Certain propositions, Coherence, Coherent norms, Colloquial language, Compositional, Compositional functions, Compositional structure, Compositional tension, Compositional tensions, Compositionally, Concept horse, Conceptual ineffability, Conceptual resources, Conditional claim, Constituent expressions, Coordination failures, English words, Essential ineffabilities, Essential propositional, Essential propositional ineffabilities, Exhaustive norms, Existential claim, Existential claims, Existential form, Expressible, Expressive, Expressive failures, Expressive limitation, Expressive limitations, Expressive power, Favorite integer, Formal models, Formal theories, Formal theory, Foundational accounts, Frege, Greatest integer, Heuristic purposes, Human beings, Idealizing assumption, Imaginable circumstance, Indexical allusion, Ineffabilities, Ineffability, Ineffable, Ineffable propositions, Inexpressible, Inexpressible properties, Integer, Intelligible proposition, Intuitive sense, Kind mika, Language users, Least integer, Liar paradox, Limitation, Linguistic expression, Linguistic limitation, Linguistic resources, Linguistic technicality, Literal content, Literal expression, Literal language, Many integers, Metaphorical contents, Mika, More utterances, Natural language, Natural languages, Necessary proposition, Number mika, Other ways, Oxford university press, Paradox, Paradoxical, Paradoxical statements, Paradoxical utterances, Particular integer, Particular kind, Particular proposition, Phenomenological research, Philosophical logic, Philosophical studies, Possible worlds, Potential asymmetries, Previous section, Prime number, Problematic, Problematic utterances, Proposition, Propositional, Propositional content, Propositional contents, Propositional ineffabilities, Propositional structure, Real number, Reasoning argument, Referent, Relevant proposition, Relevant utterance, Same kind, Semantic, Semantic concepts, Semantic defect, Semantic paradox, Semantic paradoxes, Semantic properties, Semantic propositional universality, Semantic propositions, Semantic terms, Semantics, Simple bivalent proposition, Simple ways, Special explanation, Special kind, Speech acts, Strong forms, Such integer, Super referent, Theoretical satisfaction, True answer, True answers, True proposition, Truth conditions, Truth value, Truth values, Unique integer, Unthinkable propositions, Utterance, Utterances today, Wittgenstein.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2011.00530.x
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 000537
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: 000537
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: 000947
- to stream Main, to step Merge: 005F45
- to stream Main, to step Curation: 005C04
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Truth, Paradox, and Ineffable Propositions</title><author><name sortKey="Shaw, James R" sort="Shaw, James R" uniqKey="Shaw J" first="James R." last="Shaw">James R. Shaw</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:16A08CA3C9B09F242A6B3443C0A43F1567C75B63</idno><date when="2013" year="2013">2013</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1933-1592.2011.00530.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/16A08CA3C9B09F242A6B3443C0A43F1567C75B63/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000537</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000537</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">000537</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">000947</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000947</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0031-8205:2013:Shaw J:truth:paradox:and</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">005F45</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">005C04</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">005C04</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Truth, Paradox, and Ineffable Propositions<ref type="note" target="#fn1">*</ref></title><author><name sortKey="Shaw, James R" sort="Shaw, James R" uniqKey="Shaw J" first="James R." last="Shaw">James R. Shaw</name><affiliation wicri:level="4"><country>États-Unis</country><placeName><settlement type="city">Pittsburgh</settlement><region type="state">Pennsylvanie</region></placeName><orgName type="university">Université de Pittsburgh</orgName></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Philosophy and Phenomenological Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">PHILOSOPHY PHENOMENOLOGICAL RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">0031-8205</idno><idno type="eISSN">1933-1592</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">86</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="64">64</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="104">104</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">41</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2013-01">2013-01</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0031-8205</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0031-8205</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Actual utterances</term><term>Ahmed</term><term>Berry paradox</term><term>Best candidate</term><term>Best candidate proposition</term><term>Certain kind</term><term>Certain properties</term><term>Certain propositions</term><term>Coherence</term><term>Coherent norms</term><term>Colloquial language</term><term>Compositional</term><term>Compositional functions</term><term>Compositional structure</term><term>Compositional tension</term><term>Compositional tensions</term><term>Compositionally</term><term>Concept horse</term><term>Conceptual ineffability</term><term>Conceptual resources</term><term>Conditional claim</term><term>Constituent expressions</term><term>Coordination failures</term><term>English words</term><term>Essential ineffabilities</term><term>Essential propositional</term><term>Essential propositional ineffabilities</term><term>Exhaustive norms</term><term>Existential claim</term><term>Existential claims</term><term>Existential form</term><term>Expressible</term><term>Expressive</term><term>Expressive failures</term><term>Expressive limitation</term><term>Expressive limitations</term><term>Expressive power</term><term>Favorite integer</term><term>Formal models</term><term>Formal theories</term><term>Formal theory</term><term>Foundational accounts</term><term>Frege</term><term>Greatest integer</term><term>Heuristic purposes</term><term>Human beings</term><term>Idealizing assumption</term><term>Imaginable circumstance</term><term>Indexical allusion</term><term>Ineffabilities</term><term>Ineffability</term><term>Ineffable</term><term>Ineffable propositions</term><term>Inexpressible</term><term>Inexpressible properties</term><term>Integer</term><term>Intelligible proposition</term><term>Intuitive sense</term><term>Kind mika</term><term>Language users</term><term>Least integer</term><term>Liar paradox</term><term>Limitation</term><term>Linguistic expression</term><term>Linguistic limitation</term><term>Linguistic resources</term><term>Linguistic technicality</term><term>Literal content</term><term>Literal expression</term><term>Literal language</term><term>Many integers</term><term>Metaphorical contents</term><term>Mika</term><term>More utterances</term><term>Natural language</term><term>Natural languages</term><term>Necessary proposition</term><term>Number mika</term><term>Other ways</term><term>Oxford university press</term><term>Paradox</term><term>Paradoxical</term><term>Paradoxical statements</term><term>Paradoxical utterances</term><term>Particular integer</term><term>Particular kind</term><term>Particular proposition</term><term>Phenomenological research</term><term>Philosophical logic</term><term>Philosophical studies</term><term>Possible worlds</term><term>Potential asymmetries</term><term>Previous section</term><term>Prime number</term><term>Problematic</term><term>Problematic utterances</term><term>Proposition</term><term>Propositional</term><term>Propositional content</term><term>Propositional contents</term><term>Propositional ineffabilities</term><term>Propositional structure</term><term>Real number</term><term>Reasoning argument</term><term>Referent</term><term>Relevant proposition</term><term>Relevant utterance</term><term>Same kind</term><term>Semantic</term><term>Semantic concepts</term><term>Semantic defect</term><term>Semantic paradox</term><term>Semantic paradoxes</term><term>Semantic properties</term><term>Semantic propositional universality</term><term>Semantic propositions</term><term>Semantic terms</term><term>Semantics</term><term>Simple bivalent proposition</term><term>Simple ways</term><term>Special explanation</term><term>Special kind</term><term>Speech acts</term><term>Strong forms</term><term>Such integer</term><term>Super referent</term><term>Theoretical satisfaction</term><term>True answer</term><term>True answers</term><term>True proposition</term><term>Truth conditions</term><term>Truth value</term><term>Truth values</term><term>Unique integer</term><term>Unthinkable propositions</term><term>Utterance</term><term>Utterances today</term><term>Wittgenstein</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Actual utterances</term><term>Ahmed</term><term>Berry paradox</term><term>Best candidate</term><term>Best candidate proposition</term><term>Certain kind</term><term>Certain properties</term><term>Certain propositions</term><term>Coherence</term><term>Coherent norms</term><term>Colloquial language</term><term>Compositional</term><term>Compositional functions</term><term>Compositional structure</term><term>Compositional tension</term><term>Compositional tensions</term><term>Compositionally</term><term>Concept horse</term><term>Conceptual ineffability</term><term>Conceptual resources</term><term>Conditional claim</term><term>Constituent expressions</term><term>Coordination failures</term><term>English words</term><term>Essential ineffabilities</term><term>Essential propositional</term><term>Essential propositional ineffabilities</term><term>Exhaustive norms</term><term>Existential claim</term><term>Existential claims</term><term>Existential form</term><term>Expressible</term><term>Expressive</term><term>Expressive failures</term><term>Expressive limitation</term><term>Expressive limitations</term><term>Expressive power</term><term>Favorite integer</term><term>Formal models</term><term>Formal theories</term><term>Formal theory</term><term>Foundational accounts</term><term>Frege</term><term>Greatest integer</term><term>Heuristic purposes</term><term>Human beings</term><term>Idealizing assumption</term><term>Imaginable circumstance</term><term>Indexical allusion</term><term>Ineffabilities</term><term>Ineffability</term><term>Ineffable</term><term>Ineffable propositions</term><term>Inexpressible</term><term>Inexpressible properties</term><term>Integer</term><term>Intelligible proposition</term><term>Intuitive sense</term><term>Kind mika</term><term>Language users</term><term>Least integer</term><term>Liar paradox</term><term>Limitation</term><term>Linguistic expression</term><term>Linguistic limitation</term><term>Linguistic resources</term><term>Linguistic technicality</term><term>Literal content</term><term>Literal expression</term><term>Literal language</term><term>Many integers</term><term>Metaphorical contents</term><term>Mika</term><term>More utterances</term><term>Natural language</term><term>Natural languages</term><term>Necessary proposition</term><term>Number mika</term><term>Other ways</term><term>Oxford university press</term><term>Paradox</term><term>Paradoxical</term><term>Paradoxical statements</term><term>Paradoxical utterances</term><term>Particular integer</term><term>Particular kind</term><term>Particular proposition</term><term>Phenomenological research</term><term>Philosophical logic</term><term>Philosophical studies</term><term>Possible worlds</term><term>Potential asymmetries</term><term>Previous section</term><term>Prime number</term><term>Problematic</term><term>Problematic utterances</term><term>Proposition</term><term>Propositional</term><term>Propositional content</term><term>Propositional contents</term><term>Propositional ineffabilities</term><term>Propositional structure</term><term>Real number</term><term>Reasoning argument</term><term>Referent</term><term>Relevant proposition</term><term>Relevant utterance</term><term>Same kind</term><term>Semantic</term><term>Semantic concepts</term><term>Semantic defect</term><term>Semantic paradox</term><term>Semantic paradoxes</term><term>Semantic properties</term><term>Semantic propositional universality</term><term>Semantic propositions</term><term>Semantic terms</term><term>Semantics</term><term>Simple bivalent proposition</term><term>Simple ways</term><term>Special explanation</term><term>Special kind</term><term>Speech acts</term><term>Strong forms</term><term>Such integer</term><term>Super referent</term><term>Theoretical satisfaction</term><term>True answer</term><term>True answers</term><term>True proposition</term><term>Truth conditions</term><term>Truth value</term><term>Truth values</term><term>Unique integer</term><term>Unthinkable propositions</term><term>Utterance</term><term>Utterances today</term><term>Wittgenstein</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader></TEI><affiliations><list><country><li>États-Unis</li></country><region><li>Pennsylvanie</li></region><settlement><li>Pittsburgh</li></settlement><orgName><li>Université de Pittsburgh</li></orgName></list><tree><country name="États-Unis"><region name="Pennsylvanie"><name sortKey="Shaw, James R" sort="Shaw, James R" uniqKey="Shaw J" first="James R." last="Shaw">James R. Shaw</name></region></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Amérique/explor/PittsburghV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 005C04 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 005C04 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Amérique
|area= PittsburghV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:16A08CA3C9B09F242A6B3443C0A43F1567C75B63
|texte= Truth, Paradox, and Ineffable Propositions
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.38. |  |