Conjectures and Refutations
Identifieur interne : 000C69 ( Main/Curation ); précédent : 000C68; suivant : 000C70Conjectures and Refutations
Auteurs : Jane F. Gilgun [États-Unis]Source :
- Qualitative Social Work [ 1473-3250 ] ; 2002-09.
Abstract
In this article, I review ‘Qualitative Methods in Health Research’, a document sponsored by three offices of the US National Institutes of Health (NIH). The document has the purpose of educating qualitative researchers on how to fit proposals based on qualitative approaches to NIH requirements for funding. I show that the NIH document provides helpful guidelines, and I make suggestions of my own, such as using sensitizing concepts and the procedures of analytic induction, to meet federal requirements. I was stymied, however, on how to deal with the distanced language that appears mandatory in proposals that NIH funds. This led me to reflect on whether NIH has a definition of science that excludes the perspectives and assumptions of many forms of qualitative research. I also wondered whether qualitative researchers in other countries are finding that governmental agencies do not fund qualitative research because of doubts about its scientific basis. I concluded that qualitative researchers can challenge NIH and other funding agencies internationally about the nature of science and press for modifications of assumptions about what constitutes fundable research proposals. Creative and constructive dialogue may open funding streams to researchers whose questions lead to the use of qualitative approaches, both within the USA and internationally.
Url:
DOI: 10.1177/147332500200100309
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :001A66
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :001A62
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000957
- to stream Main, to step Merge: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000C77
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:3949A5DE979555B0A230BEAD810FE898E55C71C0Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Conjectures and Refutations</title><author wicri:is="90%"><name sortKey="Gilgun, Jane F" sort="Gilgun, Jane F" uniqKey="Gilgun J" first="Jane F." last="Gilgun">Jane F. Gilgun</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:3949A5DE979555B0A230BEAD810FE898E55C71C0</idno><date when="2002" year="2002">2002</date><idno type="doi">10.1177/147332500200100309</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/3949A5DE979555B0A230BEAD810FE898E55C71C0/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001A66</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001A66</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">001A62</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">000957</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000957</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">1473-3250:2002:Gilgun J:conjectures:and:refutations</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">000C77</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000C69</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Conjectures and Refutations</title><author wicri:is="90%"><name sortKey="Gilgun, Jane F" sort="Gilgun, Jane F" uniqKey="Gilgun J" first="Jane F." last="Gilgun">Jane F. Gilgun</name><affiliation></affiliation><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country wicri:rule="url">États-Unis</country></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Qualitative Social Work</title><idno type="ISSN">1473-3250</idno><idno type="eISSN">1741-3117</idno><imprint><publisher>Sage Publications</publisher><pubPlace>Sage CA: Thousand Oaks, CA</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2002-09">2002-09</date><biblScope unit="volume">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="359">359</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="375">375</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1473-3250</idno></series><idno type="istex">3949A5DE979555B0A230BEAD810FE898E55C71C0</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1177/147332500200100309</idno><idno type="ArticleID">10.1177_147332500200100309</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1473-3250</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">In this article, I review ‘Qualitative Methods in Health Research’, a document sponsored by three offices of the US National Institutes of Health (NIH). The document has the purpose of educating qualitative researchers on how to fit proposals based on qualitative approaches to NIH requirements for funding. I show that the NIH document provides helpful guidelines, and I make suggestions of my own, such as using sensitizing concepts and the procedures of analytic induction, to meet federal requirements. I was stymied, however, on how to deal with the distanced language that appears mandatory in proposals that NIH funds. This led me to reflect on whether NIH has a definition of science that excludes the perspectives and assumptions of many forms of qualitative research. I also wondered whether qualitative researchers in other countries are finding that governmental agencies do not fund qualitative research because of doubts about its scientific basis. I concluded that qualitative researchers can challenge NIH and other funding agencies internationally about the nature of science and press for modifications of assumptions about what constitutes fundable research proposals. Creative and constructive dialogue may open funding streams to researchers whose questions lead to the use of qualitative approaches, both within the USA and internationally.</div></front></TEI></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Psychologie/explor/TherFamFrancoV1/Data/Main/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000C69 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 000C69 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Psychologie
|area= TherFamFrancoV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Curation
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:3949A5DE979555B0A230BEAD810FE898E55C71C0
|texte= Conjectures and Refutations
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.29. |  |